正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Codex released a super Design UI tool so I stole it last night and put it on @getkomand >>:D u can use Opus 4.7/GPT 5.4... whatever u like

Paulius 🏴‍☠️

27,656 subscribers

86,011 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I don't think there's a single terminal ux that handles agent swarms well With slate, you can literally use Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 at the exact same time But making it intuitive took a ton of work So heres a thread on how it works and how to actually use it 🧵

I don't think there's a single terminal ux that handles agent swarms well With slate, you can literally use Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4 at the exact same time But making it intuitive took a ton of work So heres a thread on how it works and how to actually use it 🧵

akira

139,114 次观看 • 5 个月前

Codex + 5.5 + computer use built me an iPhone shortcut to make it easy to use GPT Image 2 on any photo in my camera roll. Then it edited this screen recording with ffmpeg to speed it up so I could share it. Great for making quick UI mocks on my phone. And for lulz.

Codex + 5.5 + computer use built me an iPhone shortcut to make it easy to use GPT Image 2 on any photo in my camera roll. Then it edited this screen recording with ffmpeg to speed it up so I could share it. Great for making quick UI mocks on my phone. And for lulz.

Ilya Abyzov

45,451 次观看 • 3 个月前

Codex cooked for 12 hours 19 minutes last night using a /goal 🎉 It added: - Stopwatch (count up) - Clock (with seconds) - Pomodoro - Tabata - Autocomplete Everything worked except the UI interactions around auto-complete (Codex GPT-5.5 is still not great at UI, but even Claude Opus 4.8 Ultracode struggled here). Overall, I'm really happy with the results. These are features that I've wanted for a while, and getting them close to release is awesome.

Codex cooked for 12 hours 19 minutes last night using a /goal 🎉 It added: - Stopwatch (count up) - Clock (with seconds) - Pomodoro - Tabata - Autocomplete Everything worked except the UI interactions around auto-complete (Codex GPT-5.5 is still not great at UI, but even Claude Opus 4.8 Ultracode struggled here). Overall, I'm really happy with the results. These are features that I've wanted for a while, and getting them close to release is awesome.

Paul Solt

48,887 次观看 • 1 个月前

After a weekend of testing and working on something with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look like

After a weekend of testing and working on something with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look like

Tibor Blaho

29,794 次观看 • 6 个月前

They can flow out of this at the end when it glows red so end the combo a bit earlier but i swore it worked in the last test. 5AA > 5B > 2C xx 236B > 5AA > 5B > 2C > 2F~B > j6F > jAB > j2F > 5AA > 5B > 2C xx 214C > 2F > 5AA > 5B > 2C > 214A > Super F = Flow

They can flow out of this at the end when it glows red so end the combo a bit earlier but i swore it worked in the last test. 5AA > 5B > 2C xx 236B > 5AA > 5B > 2C > 2F~B > j6F > jAB > j2F > 5AA > 5B > 2C xx 214C > 2F > 5AA > 5B > 2C > 214A > Super F = Flow

Exltd

35,471 次观看 • 1 个月前

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.

Dev Ed

660,154 次观看 • 5 个月前

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (4/9) prompt: Build a production-quality 3D flight-tracking web app using React + Vite + Three.js (react-three-fiber + drei) that visualizes live OpenSky aircraft data on a rotatable 3D Earth, with real-time plane motion, smooth interpolation, altitude-accurate positioning, and polished lighting/post-processing. Both models did really well on this one and honestly I’m impressed with both. GPT-5.4 had the nicer post-processing out of the box. I really liked the subtle light shimmer on the airplanes when rotating the planet, and the camera work when clicking a plane felt better overall. Opus 4.6 though had a few details I liked more. It automatically went and found a much nicer Earth texture on GitHub, while with GPT-5.4 I had to reprompt it to go look for a better one. I also preferred Opus’s plane model overall, it just looked more polished, whereas GPT-5.4’s plane asset looked a bit funny. One thing I noticed with GPT-5.4 is that when you click into the plane, the camera sometimes clips through the planet, which breaks the effect a bit. Opus handled that part more cleanly. Overall this felt like a strong result from both, just with different strengths. GPT-5.4 felt better on presentation and post-processing, while Opus had better asset choices and a more premium-looking Earth/plane combo.

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (4/9) prompt: Build a production-quality 3D flight-tracking web app using React + Vite + Three.js (react-three-fiber + drei) that visualizes live OpenSky aircraft data on a rotatable 3D Earth, with real-time plane motion, smooth interpolation, altitude-accurate positioning, and polished lighting/post-processing. Both models did really well on this one and honestly I’m impressed with both. GPT-5.4 had the nicer post-processing out of the box. I really liked the subtle light shimmer on the airplanes when rotating the planet, and the camera work when clicking a plane felt better overall. Opus 4.6 though had a few details I liked more. It automatically went and found a much nicer Earth texture on GitHub, while with GPT-5.4 I had to reprompt it to go look for a better one. I also preferred Opus’s plane model overall, it just looked more polished, whereas GPT-5.4’s plane asset looked a bit funny. One thing I noticed with GPT-5.4 is that when you click into the plane, the camera sometimes clips through the planet, which breaks the effect a bit. Opus handled that part more cleanly. Overall this felt like a strong result from both, just with different strengths. GPT-5.4 felt better on presentation and post-processing, while Opus had better asset choices and a more premium-looking Earth/plane combo.

Dev Ed

279,565 次观看 • 5 个月前

I stole everybody's lead magnets and put them together so you can be lazy and not have to do them anymore of those -> "comment X and I'll send you BLAH BLAH BLAH" If you want it... retweet and reply "gimme" so I can funnel you lmfao

I stole everybody's lead magnets and put them together so you can be lazy and not have to do them anymore of those -> "comment X and I'll send you BLAH BLAH BLAH" If you want it... retweet and reply "gimme" so I can funnel you lmfao

Grant

66,872 次观看 • 2 年前

Updated the subagents system in my custom Pi extension to include: - Pi subagents - Codex subagents - Claude Code subagents The Pi thread can call and spin up any of them, and instead of just using the "codex exec" or whatever, it'll do a tool call that wraps it up in a first class way. Have a decent UI for them already added in as well. Pi being the main thread then having Codex/Claude Code as tools when needed feels so good. A flow I'm already using a ton is: "Implement feature ___, have a cc fable subagent research and plan out the api design + feature, then have a codex subagent implement it, then have a cc fable subagent do a review/fixes focused on simplicity and correctness" I also have a dynamic workflows extension setup and working, but it's not nearly as polished yet. Probably gonna make the subagent system more robust, then built it around that so u could have a workflow that flows between codex/cc/pi...

Updated the subagents system in my custom Pi extension to include: - Pi subagents - Codex subagents - Claude Code subagents The Pi thread can call and spin up any of them, and instead of just using the "codex exec" or whatever, it'll do a tool call that wraps it up in a first class way. Have a decent UI for them already added in as well. Pi being the main thread then having Codex/Claude Code as tools when needed feels so good. A flow I'm already using a ton is: "Implement feature ___, have a cc fable subagent research and plan out the api design + feature, then have a codex subagent implement it, then have a cc fable subagent do a review/fixes focused on simplicity and correctness" I also have a dynamic workflows extension setup and working, but it's not nearly as polished yet. Probably gonna make the subagent system more robust, then built it around that so u could have a workflow that flows between codex/cc/pi...

Ben Davis

24,827 次观看 • 29 天前

claude opus 4.7 just dropped so i automated my ENTIRE cold email system that books 80 calls/month just put together 30 pages on the full AI playbook - AI writes my scripts (better than i can) - AI researches and personalizes leads - AI replies to interested leads 24/7 - AI optimizes campaigns from the data - every prompt i use for everything this wouldve saved me 2 years of trial and error like + comment "OPUS" and i'll send it over (must follow + RT for priority access)

claude opus 4.7 just dropped so i automated my ENTIRE cold email system that books 80 calls/month just put together 30 pages on the full AI playbook - AI writes my scripts (better than i can) - AI researches and personalizes leads - AI replies to interested leads 24/7 - AI optimizes campaigns from the data - every prompt i use for everything this wouldve saved me 2 years of trial and error like + comment "OPUS" and i'll send it over (must follow + RT for priority access)

James Shields

25,524 次观看 • 3 个月前

UI/UX Designers, you can now generate stunning 3D mockup images and videos without relying on Figma plugins. I found this amazing tool called ContentCore, It quickly generate high-quality 3D device mockups (images and video animations) to showcase your UI designs, with zero design hassle. Bookmark it for later 💜

UI/UX Designers, you can now generate stunning 3D mockup images and videos without relying on Figma plugins. I found this amazing tool called ContentCore, It quickly generate high-quality 3D device mockups (images and video animations) to showcase your UI designs, with zero design hassle. Bookmark it for later 💜

Abraham John 🦄🦓

48,047 次观看 • 10 个月前

Today Meta released "Code Llama", a large language model fine-tuned for coding tasks. It's publicly available and can be used for commercial use! It outperforms GPT 3.5 and you can even run it locally on your Macbook using Ollama.

Today Meta released "Code Llama", a large language model fine-tuned for coding tasks. It's publicly available and can be used for commercial use! It outperforms GPT 3.5 and you can even run it locally on your Macbook using Ollama.

Marcel Pociot 🧪

50,094 次观看 • 3 年前

I literally don't use Claude anymore... Just Claude Code and Codex in the web. This is a presentation I had Opus generate after doing research... And if you save the prompt you can have it generate in any style you want.

I literally don't use Claude anymore... Just Claude Code and Codex in the web. This is a presentation I had Opus generate after doing research... And if you save the prompt you can have it generate in any style you want.

Riley Brown

118,000 次观看 • 11 个月前

GPT-5.6 Sol is unbelievably good at creating and editing videos. It can do motion design, product demos, and animations like this one I made by simply giving it a screen recording. GPT 5.6 has the best design taste and significantly outperforms Fable, which relies heavily on repetitive design patterns. To help you experiment with video editing on it, we just launched a collection of 100 ready-to-use skills that show what’s possible and help you get started with video editing using GPT-5.6. These skills can create anything from motion graphics launch videos for your product to a 3B1B-style science explainer video. You can also use them to edit existing videos: add captions, generate motion graphics, create voiceovers, redesign visual styles, translate into new languages, and much more. If you want access to the full library, comment “VIDEO SKILLS” and I’ll share it with you. (You'll have to follow me so I can DM you.)

GPT-5.6 Sol is unbelievably good at creating and editing videos. It can do motion design, product demos, and animations like this one I made by simply giving it a screen recording. GPT 5.6 has the best design taste and significantly outperforms Fable, which relies heavily on repetitive design patterns. To help you experiment with video editing on it, we just launched a collection of 100 ready-to-use skills that show what’s possible and help you get started with video editing using GPT-5.6. These skills can create anything from motion graphics launch videos for your product to a 3B1B-style science explainer video. You can also use them to edit existing videos: add captions, generate motion graphics, create voiceovers, redesign visual styles, translate into new languages, and much more. If you want access to the full library, comment “VIDEO SKILLS” and I’ll share it with you. (You'll have to follow me so I can DM you.)

Akash Anand

513,032 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 GPT-5.6 features flag can be enabled in the codex > So we can see ui but can't use the model directly > Only trusted users are given access for now Personal life update: my adhd get worse with vacation as it fuck up my routine that's why I was not active lately, suggest something to solve this 🫂

🚨 GPT-5.6 features flag can be enabled in the codex > So we can see ui but can't use the model directly > Only trusted users are given access for now Personal life update: my adhd get worse with vacation as it fuck up my routine that's why I was not active lately, suggest something to solve this 🫂

Chetaslua

354,915 次观看 • 1 个月前

SwiftUI is a design tool from the future. For #WWDC23, Will Danner and I gave a talk on how we’ve been using it to design Apple Maps, and how you can do the same! Full video:

SwiftUI is a design tool from the future. For #WWDC23, Will Danner and I gave a talk on how we’ve been using it to design Apple Maps, and how you can do the same! Full video:

Philip Davis

453,863 次观看 • 3 年前

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 🧱 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 🧱:

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 🧱 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 🧱:

Dan Shipper 📧

354,290 次观看 • 2 个月前

> I meet every requirement for 𝕏 monetisation, yet I’ve never bought a blue tick,the last one was gifted > I use 𝕏 purely for love of the game and to cook hijda IT cell

> I meet every requirement for 𝕏 monetisation, yet I’ve never bought a blue tick,the last one was gifted > I use 𝕏 purely for love of the game and to cook hijda IT cell

ghatak

18,089 次观看 • 4 天前

feeling so grateful for all the love on bouquet deluxe and i’m still gonna love you 💛 💐 every time u tag me in a reaction, a comment, an edit … i see it and i feel it. i made this music for me and for u to make it your own. 💛 it means everything. thank u. gx

feeling so grateful for all the love on bouquet deluxe and i’m still gonna love you 💛 💐 every time u tag me in a reaction, a comment, an edit … i see it and i feel it. i made this music for me and for u to make it your own. 💛 it means everything. thank u. gx

Gwen Stefani

45,823 次观看 • 1 年前

Nano Banana Pro is completely taking over design it can put your own texts & images on a blank magazine.. and design the layout for you nicely in a few mins how I did it on ImagineArt (with prompts):

Nano Banana Pro is completely taking over design it can put your own texts & images on a blank magazine.. and design the layout for you nicely in a few mins how I did it on ImagineArt (with prompts):

el.cine

114,436 次观看 • 8 个月前