Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

After a weekend of testing and working on something with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even...

btibor91's profile picture

Tibor Blaho

36,668 subscribers

29,794 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I don't even need to mention which landing page was created by Opus 4.6 and which one by GPT-5.3-CODEX
0:16

I don't even need to mention which landing page was created by Opus 4.6 and which one by GPT-5.3-CODEX

Karan

90,021 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Introducing WarpGrep v2. #1 on SWE-Bench Pro What if code search was a separate, specialized model? w/ WarpGrep v2: #1 on SWE-Bench Pro Opus 4.6 → 57.5 (+2.1) Codex 5.3 (cli) → 59.1 (+3.1) MiniMax 2.5 → 57.6 (+3.7) without WarpGrep: Opus 4.6 (high) → 55.4 GPT-5.3 Codex (high) → 56.0 MiniMax 2.5 → 55.4
0:16

Introducing WarpGrep v2. #1 on SWE-Bench Pro What if code search was a separate, specialized model? w/ WarpGrep v2: #1 on SWE-Bench Pro Opus 4.6 → 57.5 (+2.1) Codex 5.3 (cli) → 59.1 (+3.1) MiniMax 2.5 → 57.6 (+3.7) without WarpGrep: Opus 4.6 (high) → 55.4 GPT-5.3 Codex (high) → 56.0 MiniMax 2.5 → 55.4

Morph

56,540 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

GPT 5.3 vs Opus 4.6: a second win for Opus! ✔︎ Opus builds the file 2x faster ✔︎ Opus nails a good first version ❌ Codex needs 3x "fix bugs" to have a first working version ❌ Codex UI looks really bad Let's try more things....
0:16

GPT 5.3 vs Opus 4.6: a second win for Opus! ✔︎ Opus builds the file 2x faster ✔︎ Opus nails a good first version ❌ Codex needs 3x "fix bugs" to have a first working version ❌ Codex UI looks really bad Let's try more things....

Melvyn • Builder

70,316 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🐐 Gemini 3 Pro GA One shot prompt is in comment with the codepen link I repeat no model in this entire world able to implement this level of physics and spatial reasoning Not even Opus 4.6 and Gpt-5.3 codex , this is like a generation gap Sub Woofer submitted this
0:15

🐐 Gemini 3 Pro GA One shot prompt is in comment with the codepen link I repeat no model in this entire world able to implement this level of physics and spatial reasoning Not even Opus 4.6 and Gpt-5.3 codex , this is like a generation gap Sub Woofer submitted this

Chetaslua

35,579 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Eulerian Fluid simulation test! Zero-shot! Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 vs Gemini 3 Deep Think! My personal preference: 🥇 Gemini 3 Deep Think (really strong!) 🥈 Opus 4.6 🥉 GPT 5.3 High
0:19

Eulerian Fluid simulation test! Zero-shot! Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 vs Gemini 3 Deep Think! My personal preference: 🥇 Gemini 3 Deep Think (really strong!) 🥈 Opus 4.6 🥉 GPT 5.3 High

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

38,277 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

They're finally here. GPT 5.1 Codex and Codex Max are now in Warp, from Low to XHigh reasoning ✨
0:13

They're finally here. GPT 5.1 Codex and Codex Max are now in Warp, from Low to XHigh reasoning ✨

Warp

13,397 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The model is faster, the pelican isn't as good! GPT-5.3 Codex Spark on the left, GPT-5.3 Codex 5.3 on the right - both at medium quality settings
0:08

The model is faster, the pelican isn't as good! GPT-5.3 Codex Spark on the left, GPT-5.3 Codex 5.3 on the right - both at medium quality settings

Simon Willison

57,440 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

And this is 5.4 xhigh in codex. Much better than what 5.3 gave me.
0:18

And this is 5.4 xhigh in codex. Much better than what 5.3 gave me.

Jimmy Apples 🍎/acc

67,446 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

What's a game without a menu? I went with Opus 4.6 for this one (better taste for frontend UI than Codex 5.3). Also going with 'Zombies Per Minute' right now for name:) Curious to know what you think? Next up: leaderboards
0:15

What's a game without a menu? I went with Opus 4.6 for this one (better taste for frontend UI than Codex 5.3). Also going with 'Zombies Per Minute' right now for name:) Curious to know what you think? Next up: leaderboards

Nicolas Zullo

71,474 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.
0:10

Opus 4.6 vs GPT 5.4 (High) (1/9) prompt: Build a single-file HTML/CSS/JS (no libs) demo that uses SVG to simulate a plant growing: stem extends, leaves sprout + unfurl with springy/windy “physics”, then seamlessly loops forever. For the initial impressions I'm really impressed by GPT, for speed they both felt about the same, but gpt was still half cheaper than opus. I also much prefer the design and animation that gpt produced, physics on the leaves are super cool and it also loops pretty nicely whilst opus just fades out the plant. Still got a bunch of tests to run but this is really exciting.

Dev Ed

660,011 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Can't stop iterating on this ! Opus 4.5 + Claude Code to plan design polish GPT 5.2 + Codex CLI to implement the plan Result: - More weapons - Particle effects + visual VFX - Dynamic camera - Destructible items And here's a cool kill-cam at the end of the round 🎥
0:10

Can't stop iterating on this ! Opus 4.5 + Claude Code to plan design polish GPT 5.2 + Codex CLI to implement the plan Result: - More weapons - Particle effects + visual VFX - Dynamic camera - Destructible items And here's a cool kill-cam at the end of the round 🎥

Chong-U

97,384 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

10 minutes later, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has my Raptor Call of Shadows clone artwork integrated! Here's the beach map. Artwork created with imagegen Skill in Codex app. OpenAI Developers
0:18

10 minutes later, GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has my Raptor Call of Shadows clone artwork integrated! Here's the beach map. Artwork created with imagegen Skill in Codex app. OpenAI Developers

Paul Solt

68,498 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

GPT-5.3-Codex built this Hytale mod with just a few prompts 👀
0:17

GPT-5.3-Codex built this Hytale mod with just a few prompts 👀

Hytale Alerts

151,799 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

We’re excited to add support for Opus 4.6. With adaptive thinking, Opus 4.6 will decide the right amount of reasoning for your query, reducing latency and improving quality. Internally, we've already resolved bugs that Opus 4.5 couldn't tackle. Try it out on the latest!
0:16

We’re excited to add support for Opus 4.6. With adaptive thinking, Opus 4.6 will decide the right amount of reasoning for your query, reducing latency and improving quality. Internally, we've already resolved bugs that Opus 4.5 couldn't tackle. Try it out on the latest!

Warp

12,401 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:
0:11

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

Dan Shipper 📧

352,617 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

If you want to use Claude Opus 4.7 in the codex app
0:10

If you want to use Claude Opus 4.7 in the codex app

Riley Brown

26,474 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Claude Opus 4.6 is no joke 🫠 Just asked for a great F1 animation for Redbull using Claude Opus 4.6 on Capacity . Took like 3 minutes to get it.
0:15

Claude Opus 4.6 is no joke 🫠 Just asked for a great F1 animation for Redbull using Claude Opus 4.6 on Capacity . Took like 3 minutes to get it.

Samuel Rondot

315,234 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I’m joining OpenAI Codex to work on the future of agentic development! At Cursor, I got to see the shift from autocomplete to agents. The next step isn’t a better IDE. It’s an Agent Development Environment (ADE): systems and tools for orchestrating agents, reasoning over their outputs, and making them autonomous enough to reliably complete ambitious work. After chatting with Alexander Embiricos and Tibo, it was clear that Codex is the best place to realize this vision. The team has consistently shipped SOTA models for agentic coding (check out gpt-5.3-codex) and I’m pumped for the future that the new Codex App points to. What I’m most excited about is the broader mission: accelerating the knowledge work economy. All agents are coding agents, and we’re already seeing Codex used across every job function within organizations. I’m extremely grateful for my time at Cursor, working with the incredible team, and I’m proud of what we built together. I’m excited to take an even bigger swing with Codex. If you’re curious to get a glimpse of where we are headed, download the Codex App! If you want to work on this mission, please apply or reach out - we are hiring across all functions! You can just build things.
0:12

I’m joining OpenAI Codex to work on the future of agentic development! At Cursor, I got to see the shift from autocomplete to agents. The next step isn’t a better IDE. It’s an Agent Development Environment (ADE): systems and tools for orchestrating agents, reasoning over their outputs, and making them autonomous enough to reliably complete ambitious work. After chatting with Alexander Embiricos and Tibo, it was clear that Codex is the best place to realize this vision. The team has consistently shipped SOTA models for agentic coding (check out gpt-5.3-codex) and I’m pumped for the future that the new Codex App points to. What I’m most excited about is the broader mission: accelerating the knowledge work economy. All agents are coding agents, and we’re already seeing Codex used across every job function within organizations. I’m extremely grateful for my time at Cursor, working with the incredible team, and I’m proud of what we built together. I’m excited to take an even bigger swing with Codex. If you’re curious to get a glimpse of where we are headed, download the Codex App! If you want to work on this mission, please apply or reach out - we are hiring across all functions! You can just build things.

Rohan Varma

759,360 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Alrighty, everything is ready 😎 here’s an unofficial “2x Codex limits” promo from my side for you all. meet DevSpace — an MCP connector app that turns ChatGPT into Codex. npm install -g @waishnav/devspace After installing, tunnel the MCP server over the internet and enjoy 2x limits. You can use GPT-5.5 Pro, xHigh, or High for planning, then hand off the task to your local Codex/pi/opencode/cursor/claude code instance. Or you can just use it for reviewing code written by other local coding agents Go ahead, experiment with different workflows, and keep the feedback coming on GitHub Issues or in my DMs And let’s thank OpenAI for being so generous by giving us separate ChatGPT and Codex limits and by being so chill around this MCP :) Please use it sparingly, only when you run out of limits. Don’t overuse it — in the end, they do have a button to stop it 🙂
0:18

Alrighty, everything is ready 😎 here’s an unofficial “2x Codex limits” promo from my side for you all. meet DevSpace — an MCP connector app that turns ChatGPT into Codex. npm install -g @waishnav/devspace After installing, tunnel the MCP server over the internet and enjoy 2x limits. You can use GPT-5.5 Pro, xHigh, or High for planning, then hand off the task to your local Codex/pi/opencode/cursor/claude code instance. Or you can just use it for reviewing code written by other local coding agents Go ahead, experiment with different workflows, and keep the feedback coming on GitHub Issues or in my DMs And let’s thank OpenAI for being so generous by giving us separate ChatGPT and Codex limits and by being so chill around this MCP :) Please use it sparingly, only when you run out of limits. Don’t overuse it — in the end, they do have a button to stop it 🙂

waishnav

518,023 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

GPT-5.5 in Codex is built for long-session agent work. But context still doesn't follow you across projects, agents, or teammates. ByteRover does that + Save you tokens -> No rewriting context when you switch from Claude Code to Codex. Now connecting Codex, Claude Code, OpenClaw, Hermes, and 22+ more agents. Your context moves with you. → personal context for solo work → team context for shared decisions and bug history
0:17

GPT-5.5 in Codex is built for long-session agent work. But context still doesn't follow you across projects, agents, or teammates. ByteRover does that + Save you tokens -> No rewriting context when you switch from Claude Code to Codex. Now connecting Codex, Claude Code, OpenClaw, Hermes, and 22+ more agents. Your context moves with you. → personal context for solo work → team context for shared decisions and bug history

andy nguyen

12,437 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten