Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: 'Iran's ULTIMATE LEVERAGE is its nuclear programme, any ground campaign by Trump to destroy it would be DISASTROUS.' 'The reason Iran has strategic headway over anything Donald Trump does is twofold. Ultimately, it’s the nuclear programme and the Strait of Hormuz. The Omani foreign minister categorically...

GUnderground_TV's profile picture

Going Underground

199,096 subscribers

57,692 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘The US🇺🇸 is FIGHTING China🇨🇳 THROUGH Iran.’ ‘We are in fact revealing some of the dark reality behind our strategy [with the war on Iran]…and that is China, the number one economy in the world. There is no question about that anymore. It is the number one economy in the world in almost every indicator you want to look at. I think the globalists, the neoconservatives, and others of their ilk in America, in the empire, are fighting China, and they're doing it on two very vivid fronts right now: Ukraine through Russia, and in Southwest Asia directly, because that is a place where China is not going to give up. It's not going to give up on its Belt and Road Initiative. It's not going to give up on Iran. So we are not just fighting Iran, we are fighting China. And some people think purposefully so, and have that as the strategy they believe is being implemented, however imperfectly, by Donald Trump.’ —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson , former Chief of Staff at the State Department, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below 👇
2:53

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘The US🇺🇸 is FIGHTING China🇨🇳 THROUGH Iran.’ ‘We are in fact revealing some of the dark reality behind our strategy [with the war on Iran]…and that is China, the number one economy in the world. There is no question about that anymore. It is the number one economy in the world in almost every indicator you want to look at. I think the globalists, the neoconservatives, and others of their ilk in America, in the empire, are fighting China, and they're doing it on two very vivid fronts right now: Ukraine through Russia, and in Southwest Asia directly, because that is a place where China is not going to give up. It's not going to give up on its Belt and Road Initiative. It's not going to give up on Iran. So we are not just fighting Iran, we are fighting China. And some people think purposefully so, and have that as the strategy they believe is being implemented, however imperfectly, by Donald Trump.’ —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson , former Chief of Staff at the State Department, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below 👇

Going Underground

42,085 views • 2 days ago

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: 'The world is SLEEPWALKING into the potential use of NUCLEAR WEAPONS in the war on Iran.' 'I think the diplomatic instrument for the war on Iran is moribund because we have no diplomatic instrument. We have Witkoff and Kushner, who are making money. That's about the size of it. I don't know what we're trying to do other than affect by bombing and missiles what we couldn't affect any other way, and it's not going to work. It's simply not going to work... Particularly when you have the depth of China🇨🇳, the world's largest economy, on the other side, and I would say also the depth of the world's most accomplished military right now, to include its defence-industrial base, Russia🇷🇺, on your side. This is unparalleled, in terms of its potential for going much wider, much deeper, much more profoundly, maybe even to nuclear weapons use. And everyone seems to be sleepwalking into it.' —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
2:01

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: 'The world is SLEEPWALKING into the potential use of NUCLEAR WEAPONS in the war on Iran.' 'I think the diplomatic instrument for the war on Iran is moribund because we have no diplomatic instrument. We have Witkoff and Kushner, who are making money. That's about the size of it. I don't know what we're trying to do other than affect by bombing and missiles what we couldn't affect any other way, and it's not going to work. It's simply not going to work... Particularly when you have the depth of China🇨🇳, the world's largest economy, on the other side, and I would say also the depth of the world's most accomplished military right now, to include its defence-industrial base, Russia🇷🇺, on your side. This is unparalleled, in terms of its potential for going much wider, much deeper, much more profoundly, maybe even to nuclear weapons use. And everyone seems to be sleepwalking into it.' —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

120,430 views • 1 day ago

Donald Trump just wrapped up a disastrous speech in Phoenix, Arizona, at a Turning Point USA event. He started by lying about a supposed deal with Iran, claiming, “We have now secured the Strait of Hormuz. It is ours.” He also said that the United States and Iran would be excavating nuclear sites together to collect “nuclear dust.” Iran has denied all of these claims. Trump also falsely claimed that Iran had announced the Strait of Hormuz is “fully open and ready for business.” That is not what Iran said. Iranian officials have stated the strait will remain open under their control—specifically under the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps—using coordinated, predetermined routes. They plan to charge tolls and assert full control and sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.
2:10

Donald Trump just wrapped up a disastrous speech in Phoenix, Arizona, at a Turning Point USA event. He started by lying about a supposed deal with Iran, claiming, “We have now secured the Strait of Hormuz. It is ours.” He also said that the United States and Iran would be excavating nuclear sites together to collect “nuclear dust.” Iran has denied all of these claims. Trump also falsely claimed that Iran had announced the Strait of Hormuz is “fully open and ready for business.” That is not what Iran said. Iranian officials have stated the strait will remain open under their control—specifically under the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps—using coordinated, predetermined routes. They plan to charge tolls and assert full control and sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.

MeidasTouch

417,393 views • 3 months ago

China Is Desperate, and Iran Is Their Only Move Left 🚨 "If you're cornering me and I'm China... I have to make sure Iran makes it. I have to be on Iran’s side." "What is the worst thing that can happen to China? We control the Strait of Hormuz. If the US controls Kharg Island and the Strait... that's a very rough place for China."
2:35

China Is Desperate, and Iran Is Their Only Move Left 🚨 "If you're cornering me and I'm China... I have to make sure Iran makes it. I have to be on Iran’s side." "What is the worst thing that can happen to China? We control the Strait of Hormuz. If the US controls Kharg Island and the Strait... that's a very rough place for China."

PBD Podcast

78,850 views • 2 months ago

🚨 NOW: Iran is growing panicked that President Trump has EASILY out-maneuvered them and seized control of the Strait of Hormuz And they can't to ANYTHING about it! "The Iranians tried to put pressure on the United States and the military in the region and their plan BACKFIRED." "And ultimately that led to President Trump controlling the Strait of Hormuz. And that is what we are seeing right now." "Iranian ports are totally stopped at this moment. They cannot move vessels out through the Strait of Hormuz due to the U.S. Navy blockade. And the President now is issuing this new warning to the Iranian regime if they try to escalate in the Persian Gulf." Trey Yingst
1:26

🚨 NOW: Iran is growing panicked that President Trump has EASILY out-maneuvered them and seized control of the Strait of Hormuz And they can't to ANYTHING about it! "The Iranians tried to put pressure on the United States and the military in the region and their plan BACKFIRED." "And ultimately that led to President Trump controlling the Strait of Hormuz. And that is what we are seeing right now." "Iranian ports are totally stopped at this moment. They cannot move vessels out through the Strait of Hormuz due to the U.S. Navy blockade. And the President now is issuing this new warning to the Iranian regime if they try to escalate in the Persian Gulf." Trey Yingst

Eric Daugherty

103,366 views • 2 months ago

Sen. Ted Cruz says President Trump has drawn a clear red line with Iran, zero enrichment and no blackmail in the Strait of Hormuz, warning any violation will bring serious consequences: “Now there is a pause in hostilities, and President Trump is absolutely right when he says what he expects of Iran is, number one, zero enrichment, and number two, that they hand over the enriched uranium they have right now. President Trump is right to draw that line and to insist upon that. And he’s been clear as well that Iran will open and keep open the Strait of Hormuz—they will not use it for negotiating or blackmail. And I think if they try to do so, the president’s threat remains very operative—that if they shut down the Strait of Hormuz, if they break this agreement, I think the president is prepared to take out Iran’s power generation and its bridges. Hopefully, he does not have to do that. Here’s the outcome I’d like to see: a peaceful Iran with a government that wants to be friends with America, that is not waging war on America or killing Americans. That would be good for the people of Iran, and that would be good for America. That’s what President Trump, I believe, is trying to achieve.”
1:10

Sen. Ted Cruz says President Trump has drawn a clear red line with Iran, zero enrichment and no blackmail in the Strait of Hormuz, warning any violation will bring serious consequences: “Now there is a pause in hostilities, and President Trump is absolutely right when he says what he expects of Iran is, number one, zero enrichment, and number two, that they hand over the enriched uranium they have right now. President Trump is right to draw that line and to insist upon that. And he’s been clear as well that Iran will open and keep open the Strait of Hormuz—they will not use it for negotiating or blackmail. And I think if they try to do so, the president’s threat remains very operative—that if they shut down the Strait of Hormuz, if they break this agreement, I think the president is prepared to take out Iran’s power generation and its bridges. Hopefully, he does not have to do that. Here’s the outcome I’d like to see: a peaceful Iran with a government that wants to be friends with America, that is not waging war on America or killing Americans. That would be good for the people of Iran, and that would be good for America. That’s what President Trump, I believe, is trying to achieve.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

209,862 views • 3 months ago

☢️Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘IRAN HAS ALREADY WON…if they want nuclear weapons, they will make one.’ 'I think Iran is perched right now exactly where Haaretz said they were. All they have to do to win is not lose, and All the United States and Israel have to do is achieve a spectacular victory, and they aren't going to do that. So Iran’s already won. The question is, How much damage is Donald Trump and what’s left of the American military going to be done to in the interim? And How much damage is going to be done to that military, particularly its maritime elements? They have not unleashed anything significant yet on a US warship. They could and they might, and that's the end of that warship if they do. The carrier is holding off at least 1300 kilometres. Not just because of range. Because there are some missiles that can go that far. It's because the carrier is so capable of getting up to flight speed so fast that once it has a warning of a missile launch, it can itself defend fairly successfully without subsurface, surface, or airborne assets. If the carrier moves at the right moment, at the speed it's capable of achieving, it's going to be very hard to hit it in that terminal phase. But they would ultimately fail with a hypersonic missile. I take my experience from Kang Sok-Ju and Kye-Gwan in North Korea in October 2002, when we went to present them with an economic package the President and even the Vice President thought would be persuasive in getting them to back off their nuclear programme. Kye-Gwan looked right at us and said…we already have nuclear weapons. So I know how we were fooled by North Korea. I know North Korea in 2002 was working with Iran, not just on underground fortifications but also on nuclear weapons, how to match warhead to missile. So Ted, I think, is right. If the Iranians want a nuclear weapon, they'll make one.’ — Former Chief of Staff at the State Department, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
2:55

☢️Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘IRAN HAS ALREADY WON…if they want nuclear weapons, they will make one.’ 'I think Iran is perched right now exactly where Haaretz said they were. All they have to do to win is not lose, and All the United States and Israel have to do is achieve a spectacular victory, and they aren't going to do that. So Iran’s already won. The question is, How much damage is Donald Trump and what’s left of the American military going to be done to in the interim? And How much damage is going to be done to that military, particularly its maritime elements? They have not unleashed anything significant yet on a US warship. They could and they might, and that's the end of that warship if they do. The carrier is holding off at least 1300 kilometres. Not just because of range. Because there are some missiles that can go that far. It's because the carrier is so capable of getting up to flight speed so fast that once it has a warning of a missile launch, it can itself defend fairly successfully without subsurface, surface, or airborne assets. If the carrier moves at the right moment, at the speed it's capable of achieving, it's going to be very hard to hit it in that terminal phase. But they would ultimately fail with a hypersonic missile. I take my experience from Kang Sok-Ju and Kye-Gwan in North Korea in October 2002, when we went to present them with an economic package the President and even the Vice President thought would be persuasive in getting them to back off their nuclear programme. Kye-Gwan looked right at us and said…we already have nuclear weapons. So I know how we were fooled by North Korea. I know North Korea in 2002 was working with Iran, not just on underground fortifications but also on nuclear weapons, how to match warhead to missile. So Ted, I think, is right. If the Iranians want a nuclear weapon, they'll make one.’ — Former Chief of Staff at the State Department, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

48,243 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:
3:45

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:

ANI

42,644 views • 2 days ago

Military and political analyst Elijah Magnier says the clearest sign the U.S lost the Iran war is that nobody is talking about Tehran's nuclear program anymore; they're fighting over the Strait of Hormuz. America went into this focused on Iran's nuclear program, its ballistic missiles, and regional proxies. Now Trump is arguing about who gets to control Hormuz, and Elijah thinks that tells you everything about how badly the original strategy failed. Iran's missile programme is still operational, its nuclear programme has been pushed into future negotiations, and its regional proxies remain part of Tehran's strategic calculations. Yet Washington's attention is now almost entirely consumed by a source of Iranian leverage that barely existed before the war: Hormuz. Elijah says Iran has effectively pulled off a strategic sleight of hand. For years, the world obsessed over Tehran's nuclear programme while Iran quietly built an enormous missile arsenal. Those missiles eventually gave Iran the ability to absorb American and Israeli attacks and continue retaliating across the region. Now he thinks they're doing it again. Everyone is staring at the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, Iran is rebuilding missiles, maintaining its regional relationships, and buying time on the nuclear issue. Trump even briefly proposed charging ships a 20% fee to pass through the Strait. That lasted barely 24 hours before he replaced it with demands for massive Gulf investment in America. To Elijah, the whole episode exposed something much deeper. Washington says this is about freedom of navigation. But Trump accused Iran of monetizing Hormuz, then immediately tried to monetize it himself. Suddenly, the argument wasn't whether the Strait should be used as leverage; it was who gets to control it and collect the money, and Iran jumped on the contradiction immediately. Elijah's argument is that Trump has trapped himself. He entered the war determined to strip Iran of its leverage, but instead, he's handed Tehran a weapon it didn't have before. Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺
51:13

Military and political analyst Elijah Magnier says the clearest sign the U.S lost the Iran war is that nobody is talking about Tehran's nuclear program anymore; they're fighting over the Strait of Hormuz. America went into this focused on Iran's nuclear program, its ballistic missiles, and regional proxies. Now Trump is arguing about who gets to control Hormuz, and Elijah thinks that tells you everything about how badly the original strategy failed. Iran's missile programme is still operational, its nuclear programme has been pushed into future negotiations, and its regional proxies remain part of Tehran's strategic calculations. Yet Washington's attention is now almost entirely consumed by a source of Iranian leverage that barely existed before the war: Hormuz. Elijah says Iran has effectively pulled off a strategic sleight of hand. For years, the world obsessed over Tehran's nuclear programme while Iran quietly built an enormous missile arsenal. Those missiles eventually gave Iran the ability to absorb American and Israeli attacks and continue retaliating across the region. Now he thinks they're doing it again. Everyone is staring at the Strait of Hormuz. Meanwhile, Iran is rebuilding missiles, maintaining its regional relationships, and buying time on the nuclear issue. Trump even briefly proposed charging ships a 20% fee to pass through the Strait. That lasted barely 24 hours before he replaced it with demands for massive Gulf investment in America. To Elijah, the whole episode exposed something much deeper. Washington says this is about freedom of navigation. But Trump accused Iran of monetizing Hormuz, then immediately tried to monetize it himself. Suddenly, the argument wasn't whether the Strait should be used as leverage; it was who gets to control it and collect the money, and Iran jumped on the contradiction immediately. Elijah's argument is that Trump has trapped himself. He entered the war determined to strip Iran of its leverage, but instead, he's handed Tehran a weapon it didn't have before. Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺

Mario Nawfal

315,624 views • 5 days ago

🚨NEW EPISODE OF GOING UNDERGROUND⚡️ Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: The World Is SLEEPWALKING Into Potential NUCLEAR WAR Over Iran -Is the war on Iran really a war on China? -What is the threat of possible nuclear escalation caused by the war on Iran? -What dangers do Americans face at home? All this and more on this episode of Going Underground with former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Col. Lawrence Wilkerson
28:29

🚨NEW EPISODE OF GOING UNDERGROUND⚡️ Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: The World Is SLEEPWALKING Into Potential NUCLEAR WAR Over Iran -Is the war on Iran really a war on China? -What is the threat of possible nuclear escalation caused by the war on Iran? -What dangers do Americans face at home? All this and more on this episode of Going Underground with former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

Going Underground

232,889 views • 2 days ago

Kristen Welker: “If Iran disrupts shipping in the Strait of Hormuz… Would that be a red line for the United States?” Vice President Vance: “Our biggest red line is the Iranian nuclear weapons program… [If they disrupt the Strait of Hormuz] I think that would be suicidal, Kristen, for the Iranians themselves. I mean, their entire economy runs through the Strait of Hormuz. If they want to destroy their own economy and cause disruptions in the world, I think that would be their decision.”
0:53

Kristen Welker: “If Iran disrupts shipping in the Strait of Hormuz… Would that be a red line for the United States?” Vice President Vance: “Our biggest red line is the Iranian nuclear weapons program… [If they disrupt the Strait of Hormuz] I think that would be suicidal, Kristen, for the Iranians themselves. I mean, their entire economy runs through the Strait of Hormuz. If they want to destroy their own economy and cause disruptions in the world, I think that would be their decision.”

RedWave Press

1,135,654 views • 1 year ago

Murphy: But if you accept even part of the Iranian statement, Donald Trump has agreed to give Iran control of the strait of hormuz. That is extraordinary. If you go deeper into the statement from the Iranian national security council, they claim that trump has also agreed to Iran's right to enrichment, to suspend all sanctions against Iran and to allow Iran to keep their missile program, their drone program and their nuclear program.
1:21

Murphy: But if you accept even part of the Iranian statement, Donald Trump has agreed to give Iran control of the strait of hormuz. That is extraordinary. If you go deeper into the statement from the Iranian national security council, they claim that trump has also agreed to Iran's right to enrichment, to suspend all sanctions against Iran and to allow Iran to keep their missile program, their drone program and their nuclear program.

Acyn

186,741 views • 3 months ago

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: 'Iran could test a NUCLEAR WEAPON, and the US may not even know the test happened.' 'The North Koreans tested a nuclear weapon, and we didn’t even know they had tested. We got a readout from Geneva and the seismic centre there. We finally detected the second North Korean test. It’s not infallible that you’re going to detect the test, and Iran could have already made the decision and could be working underground, could have already matched warhead to missile, and be ready to go whenever they need to go. Or it could be pregnant, as it were, and ready to happen at any moment they decide. Bibi might be contemplating using a nuclear weapon on them. I think that’s the main purpose that the Iranians might have made a decision to do otherwise than their Fatwa against building nuclear weapons.' —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
1:14

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: 'Iran could test a NUCLEAR WEAPON, and the US may not even know the test happened.' 'The North Koreans tested a nuclear weapon, and we didn’t even know they had tested. We got a readout from Geneva and the seismic centre there. We finally detected the second North Korean test. It’s not infallible that you’re going to detect the test, and Iran could have already made the decision and could be working underground, could have already matched warhead to missile, and be ready to go whenever they need to go. Or it could be pregnant, as it were, and ready to happen at any moment they decide. Bibi might be contemplating using a nuclear weapon on them. I think that’s the main purpose that the Iranians might have made a decision to do otherwise than their Fatwa against building nuclear weapons.' —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

26,810 views • 1 day ago

"A GREAT AND BRILLIANT DAY FOR THE WORLD!" "THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ IS COMPLETELY OPEN..." "Now that the Hormuz Strait situation is over..." On Truth Social, Trump seems to be proclaiming that all is well with Iran and signaling that he's moving on.
0:40

"A GREAT AND BRILLIANT DAY FOR THE WORLD!" "THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ IS COMPLETELY OPEN..." "Now that the Hormuz Strait situation is over..." On Truth Social, Trump seems to be proclaiming that all is well with Iran and signaling that he's moving on.

Brian Stelter

23,291 views • 3 months ago

Reporter: Is sanctions relief for Iran on the table? Bessent: Nothing is going to be on the table until we see the Strait of Hormuz open and the Iranians agree that they have to turn over the highly enriched uranium and that they can't have a nuclear program.
0:39

Reporter: Is sanctions relief for Iran on the table? Bessent: Nothing is going to be on the table until we see the Strait of Hormuz open and the Iranians agree that they have to turn over the highly enriched uranium and that they can't have a nuclear program.

Clash Report

32,070 views • 1 month ago

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘The world has FORGOTTEN about the Palestinians. That’s fundamentally EVIL. Israel is leading the way in bringing back 20th Century horrors.’ ‘Everyone has forgotten about the Palestinians, and that's what the Israelis want and that's what Donald Trump wants. That's what we want, apparently, as an administration. We do not want anybody to remember the Palestinians as they disappear into that dark night underground under rubble, to be soon turned into whatever it is Jared Kushner and his boys have planned for them. But we've all forgotten about that. And that is fundamentally evil that we have done that. This is not the equivalent of Hitler's Holocaust, but it's very close. And if it keeps on at the present rate, and it really is 250,000–300,000 Palestinians under that rubble, and I think Ralph Nader's right about that. I think it is. This could match anything that's happened in the last century…the things that have happened that were so heinous that we thought we had left behind and built a body of law and rules to negate its coming back. It’s coming back with a vengeance, and Israel's leading the way.’ —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
2:02

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: ‘The world has FORGOTTEN about the Palestinians. That’s fundamentally EVIL. Israel is leading the way in bringing back 20th Century horrors.’ ‘Everyone has forgotten about the Palestinians, and that's what the Israelis want and that's what Donald Trump wants. That's what we want, apparently, as an administration. We do not want anybody to remember the Palestinians as they disappear into that dark night underground under rubble, to be soon turned into whatever it is Jared Kushner and his boys have planned for them. But we've all forgotten about that. And that is fundamentally evil that we have done that. This is not the equivalent of Hitler's Holocaust, but it's very close. And if it keeps on at the present rate, and it really is 250,000–300,000 Palestinians under that rubble, and I think Ralph Nader's right about that. I think it is. This could match anything that's happened in the last century…the things that have happened that were so heinous that we thought we had left behind and built a body of law and rules to negate its coming back. It’s coming back with a vengeance, and Israel's leading the way.’ —Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

68,323 views • 2 days ago

🚨WAR ON IRAN: ISRAEL COULD USE NUKES ‘A resumed war with Iran will be clearly existential for Israel, Iran is going to shellack Israel, it’s going to destroy Israel. What does Bibi Netanyahu do? He’s looking at state destruction, and he’s looking at his own political and personal destruction. That worries me. That truly worries me, because I don’t think there are too many real checks on his ability to use one of the 200 or so nuclear weapons that we think they have.’ -Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department under Ex-Secretary of State Colin Powell
1:36

🚨WAR ON IRAN: ISRAEL COULD USE NUKES ‘A resumed war with Iran will be clearly existential for Israel, Iran is going to shellack Israel, it’s going to destroy Israel. What does Bibi Netanyahu do? He’s looking at state destruction, and he’s looking at his own political and personal destruction. That worries me. That truly worries me, because I don’t think there are too many real checks on his ability to use one of the 200 or so nuclear weapons that we think they have.’ -Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the US State Department under Ex-Secretary of State Colin Powell

Afshin Rattansi

34,075 views • 4 months ago

Despite Trump’s bragging about blocking the Strait of Hormuz, numerous Chinese tankers have sailed right through—without any consequences from the US. China says it has its own agreements with Iran, and that their tankers WON’T be touched. And so far, the US is letting China do what it wants. The reality: The US isn’t actually blockading anything. Trump’s talk about closing the strait is just projection—projecting that we’re winning when we’re not, and projecting that we’re not begging Iran to reopen the strait. The Trump administration doesn’t have a winning strategy, or even a basic strategy at all…
4:34

Despite Trump’s bragging about blocking the Strait of Hormuz, numerous Chinese tankers have sailed right through—without any consequences from the US. China says it has its own agreements with Iran, and that their tankers WON’T be touched. And so far, the US is letting China do what it wants. The reality: The US isn’t actually blockading anything. Trump’s talk about closing the strait is just projection—projecting that we’re winning when we’re not, and projecting that we’re not begging Iran to reopen the strait. The Trump administration doesn’t have a winning strategy, or even a basic strategy at all…

Ben Swann

37,749 views • 3 months ago

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: WORLD WAR 3 HAS ALREADY BEGUN, Israel is dragging the US into a war against Iran🇮🇷 that it can’t win ‘Bibi Netanyahu is not just the face of Israel, he is Israel right now. And wherever Bibi Netanyahu wants to go, he’s going to go, and the United States is going to follow, however reluctantly. And I think we will follow reluctantly with war. And that’s the only way that Netanyahu is going to get out of it if he does. But what he’s going to do in the process is drag the United States into a war that it can’t win either. So thank you very much. We’re in World War Three. Tack that on to what’s happening in the Arctic, what’s happening in the Balkans, or the Baltic Sea, what’s happening in Kaliningrad, perhaps what’s happening in Ukraine and around Ukraine, what’s happening in other places between Ukraine and the Caucasus. And below the Caucasus, you got the World War already going. You’ve got several theatres already going, and all it needs to do is merge, and it will eventually, and we’re going to have a damn fine war.’ -Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the State Department under Ex-Secretary of State Colin Powell, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
1:31

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson: WORLD WAR 3 HAS ALREADY BEGUN, Israel is dragging the US into a war against Iran🇮🇷 that it can’t win ‘Bibi Netanyahu is not just the face of Israel, he is Israel right now. And wherever Bibi Netanyahu wants to go, he’s going to go, and the United States is going to follow, however reluctantly. And I think we will follow reluctantly with war. And that’s the only way that Netanyahu is going to get out of it if he does. But what he’s going to do in the process is drag the United States into a war that it can’t win either. So thank you very much. We’re in World War Three. Tack that on to what’s happening in the Arctic, what’s happening in the Balkans, or the Baltic Sea, what’s happening in Kaliningrad, perhaps what’s happening in Ukraine and around Ukraine, what’s happening in other places between Ukraine and the Caucasus. And below the Caucasus, you got the World War already going. You’ve got several theatres already going, and all it needs to do is merge, and it will eventually, and we’re going to have a damn fine war.’ -Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff at the State Department under Ex-Secretary of State Colin Powell, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

20,874 views • 10 months ago