Come and listen. Listen very well.

Both of them are saying nonsense, the first thing is luv, luv perpetrates humanity, everything is not money, a man who is centered on money completely might provide but he might not be available or compassionate because he doesn’t love you, they are only talking from their perspective

Women are not capable of LOVING MEN. As a WOMAN, your FEMININE Power will make ways for you more.. No MAN wants to marry a fellow MAN as wife…

The First Lady is retarded asf

The reason why we keep saying "love isn't enough" is because we have substituted the meaning of love for feelings. We erroneously think that the budding emotions we have for one another is love. Love is a call to responsibility. It is not a natural human state. It is selfless.

Both are saying out their fantasies,their argument aren't thesame thing and you can sense the flaw in their statements. One want divided responsibilities the other want financial responsibility. So it means if they don't find a man who is not rich they won't get married.

Chinasa spoilt hers with the last line "don't marry for love"..... For the fact that no one is perfect, without love u can't even understand, tolerate, genuinely assist or build each other... So chinasa if u get married to a man that doesn't love u, u will suffer ooooooooooo

The lady in B, knows the reality and has learnt from the experiences domiciled within her environment. Whilst the lady in A, I pity her, by the time she's 40, without a husband her ego will drop...let her keep ranting

Lady A na OS, nothing anybody wan tell me. Lady B, might not be a virgin, but has definitely not lost the value system she came to experience in her family.

B is wiser

A na idiot