Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Come this side Nick Mangwana Calling each other Western puppets for demanding free, fair and credible elections is an abnormality according to Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema. He says especially when solving problems of shambolic elections created by your lot.
183,905 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 10
@nickmangwana Shows the maturity in him.He is a leader @HHichilema
@nickmangwana I like the way regional politics is shaping. Ziso pamuroyi from all angles.
@nickmangwana They will come with more insults , but who cares we all know the truth 😉
@nickmangwana HH is an administrator they will have to dig in more to break him
@nickmangwana
@nickmangwana I tell you zanu will never miss an opportunity to embarass....here we go ,we being called abnormal..like I always say we have normalize the abnormalities I'm Zimbabwe and it's a disgrace
@nickmangwana Zambia is blessed with a leader🫡
@nickmangwana How can we face each other with confidence at our upcoming regional gatherings? This situation is truly awkward for our political relations.
@nickmangwana 😂 "especially when names are being called by those who created the problems"
@nickmangwana Nick won't respond... He is a BootLicker and a Propagandist! It's no point to debate with that lad!
![HICHILEMA LASHES OUT AND LABELS CRITICISM OF THE MUMBA 'SADC' ELECTION OBSERVATION REPORT ON ZIM ELECTIONS AN "ABNORMALITY" Below is a verbatim transcript of what Zambian President Hakainde is saying on the attached video clip: “On economic integration, enhancing growth in our individual economies, regional and Africa economy; Madam Speaker, Zambia is part of the pack of nations, civilised nations. Calling each other names, when we are solving a problem created by colleagues; and the names are being called by those who created the problem is not logic, it is not normal. It is called an abnormality. That’s what we call it”. President Hakainde Hichilema. COMMENT: Given the facts of this case, it is unheard of and is therefore abnormal that President Hichilema believes that Zimbabweans should have kept quiet and done nothing about his abuse of his ex-officio chairmanship of Sadc’s Organ on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation to unilaterally depart from the long established Sadc protocol of appointing the head of the Sadc Election Observation Mission [SEOM] to Zimbabwe from ministerial ranks in Zambia, among his UPND party elements, to instead appoint Nevers Mumba, a well-known loquacious and quarrelsome opposition political leader in Zambia. President Hichilema's unilateral appointment of Mumba, a reckless Zambian opposition politician, was not only abnormal, because it violated the normal protocol, but it was also provocative in the extreme from all standpoints, including diplomatic and political. Hichilema's abnormal and provocative appointment of a quarrelsome leader of an opposition political party in Zambia to lead SEOM in Zimbabwe has been compounded and made worse by many factors, notably and particularly four: Firstly, Mumba himself has since disclosed the shocking detail about the instruction he was given by President Hichilema prior to leaving for Zimbabwe: “He [President Hichilema] said to me, Mr Vice President go on behalf of Sadc, and all I expect from you is to help and give the Zimbabweans a free, fair and credible election. Those are the only…he said it twice. I need nothing from you Mr Vice President but free, fair and credible election, you would have done your job”. President Hichilema's instruction to Mumba is shocking not only because it is contrary to both the Sadc Code of Conduct for election observes and to the Sadc Principles and Guidelines on Democratic Elections, but also because it has the trappings of a regime change agenda. Secondly, there are striking similarities of form, substance and language between the Mumba report and the reports of European and US election observers, and the similarities leave a distinct impression of coordinated collusion. Thirdly, debates in European parliaments, like the UK’s House of Lords, have notably dragged in President Hichilema, as Europe’s hope and point man who is expected to use SEOM’s Mumba report to rein in Zimbabwe on behalf of Europe and the US. Fourthly, President Hichilema has been widely reported by the media in Zimbabwe and within Sadc to be unilaterally working the phones, including making a trip to Angola, to lobby for an extraordinary Sadc Summit to review and act on Mumba’s discredited report, in the vain hope of placing Sadc behind the ill-fated calls for fresh elections in Zimbabwe; to the detriment of the country's sovereignty. There’s a lot to be said about this abnormality of mess, but what is clear is that the abnormality was created by President Hichilema when, against established Sadc protocol, he appointed a reckless leader of an opposition political party in Zambia and gave him an unlawful instruction to "go and give the people of Zimbabwe a free, fair and credible election". No Sadc country would countenance such interference in sovereign affairs. None!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1700859717453566457/ext_tw_video_thumb/1700859159632048128/pu/img/e3vJ7ciI5hvken5P.jpg)
![#OpenQuestionsToSadc DID SADC MANDATE PRESIDENT HICHILEMA TO SEND NEVERS MUMBA WITH A SPECIFIC MISSION 'TO GO ON BEHALF OF SADC TO GIVE ZIMBABWEANS A FREE, FAIR AND CREDIBLE ELECTION?" Dear @Sadc, Below is a transcription of the attached video clip on which Dr Nevers Mumba makes staggerring claims about what he says Zambian President Hichilema told him he expected him to go and do in Zimbabwe on behalf of Sadc, as Chairperson of Sadc’s Election Observation Mission [SEOM]: “He [President Hichilema] said to me, Mr Vice President go on behalf of Sadc, and all I expect from you is to help and give the Zimbabweans a free, fair and credible election. Those are the only…he said it twice. I need nothing from you Mr Vice President but free, fair and credible election, you would have done your job. When I was in Zimbabwe, and we were on our way to go and see President Mnangagwa to pay a courtesy call on him, I contacted the President, President Hakainde Hichilema, I said Mr President I’m going to see, we are going to see your colleague, do you have a word for him; any greeting whatever? He said no, the only thing you tell my colleague is that let’s go ahead and give the Zimbabweans a free, fair and credible election. He repeated the same twice”. Dr Nevers Mumba, speaking on Zambian television in a live two hours, 21 minutes and 49 seconds long interview on SEOM’s preliminary statement on its observations of Zimbabwe’s recent harmonised general election. This is the link to the full interview: OPEN QUESTIONS TO SADC To begin with, the questions below arise from a live two hours, 21 minutes and 49 seconds long interview on Zambian national television that Dr Nevers Mumba held exclusively on SEOM’s preliminary statement on its observations of Zimbabwe’s recent harmonised general election. 1. Does SEOM’s Code of Conduct permit its Chairpersons or officials to conduct such interviews as was done by Dr Mumba, and when they hold such interviews on whose authority or behalf do they speak? 2. Did SADC Secretariat mandate President Hichilema to direct the Chairperson of SEOM “to go on behalf of Sadc to give the people of Zimbabwe a free, fair and credible election?” 3. If so, how or through what approved mechanism or protocol did Sadc expect SEOM to give the people of Zimbabwe a free, fair and credible election; and if not, what is the SADC Secretariat position on Dr Mumba’s claims regarding what he says was his job to go and do in Zimbabwe on behalf of Sadc? 4. If what Dr Mumba claims he was told by President Hichilema to go and do in Zimbabwe on behalf of Sadc is indeed what he was mandated by Sadc, who in SADC Secretariat gave that mandate, and in terms of which specific SADC Principle[s] and Guideline[s] Governing Democratic Elections (2021); was that mandate given? 5. If the mandate that Dr Mumba claims he was given by President Hichilema is not based on or supported by any SADC Principle[s] and Guideline[s] Governing Democratic Elections (2021), how and when will SADC Secretariat deal with what would be a gross violation of SEOM’s Code of Conduct? 6. Last but not least, what are the implications of Dr Mumba’s revelation that he was given a specific mission that he would have done his job if he, on behalf of Sadc, gave the Zimbabweans a free, far and credible election; on the content, integrity and credibility of SEOM’s preliminary and final reports? Your clarification of the above questions would be great public interest in Zimbabwe and the region!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1698792679348330845/ext_tw_video_thumb/1698767672899485696/pu/img/1_n7SNqGjRO-ORHg.jpg)
![REAL DICTATORS that are supported by Uncle Sam talk free, fair, and credible elections for their neighbours; while they walk the dictatorship path for themselves in their backyard. Why on earth does President Hakainde Hichilema think he does former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu's PF a favour when he does not lock them up; and why does he think that PF have no freedom of assembly to "regroup" as a political party in Zambia? Is "regrouping" [read: assembling] a crime in Zambia? Maybe SADC Secretariat should send SEOM to Lusaka to give the people of Zambia real democracy in accordance with the Sadc Treaty!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1700125664236421351/ext_tw_video_thumb/1700125625699180544/pu/img/qjyPYMunPvIzy4nC.jpg)
