Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

.Community Notes: During their presentation to Mexico's Congress, the presenters refuted the specific claims mentioned in your community note. It remains uncertain whether this is a hoax or genuine, but based on the articles referenced, it appears that the author of the community note cannot be certain "This is... a hoax and fraud." The presenters explained that their analysis was conducted in collaboration with a list of scientific laboratories and universities, whereas the articles you cited relied on input from archaeologists and scientists who never physically examined, analyzed, or observed the corpses. "In 2017, some archeologists and other professionals who call themselves scientists denounced fraud in the manufacturing of the bodies with the remains of other animals and told the public that someone mutilated the hands and feet and cut out the eye sockets to give it an alien appearance." "Do you know how many analyses? How many samples were taken? How many studies these scientists did on the bodies before making their diagnosis?" "Zero." Additionally, the presenters assert that they have made the genetics and other data available in an online repository for other scientists to review and analyze. In my opinion, the author of the community note cannot definitively label this as a 'hoax' or 'fraud' based on the claims made by archaeologists and scientists who never physically examined the bodies. I will link to a more detailed thread on the topic below.show more

KanekoaTheGreat

1,100,105 subscribers

101,586 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von KanekoaTheGreat

KanekoaTheGreatvor 2 Jahren

United States: "We allegedly recovered non-human biologics." Mexico: "Watch us unbox two mummified aliens." 👽👽

Profilbild von Dissident West

Dissident Westvor 2 Jahren

@CommunityNotes Yawn. The most obvious psyop in the history of psyops.

Profilbild von Tikorium

Tikoriumvor 2 Jahren

@CommunityNotes One thing is for certain, the little alien dude is a narcomule. Look at all of that product conspicuously hiding in its belly.

Profilbild von Patriot_151 ✝️🐸🇺🇸

Patriot_151 ✝️🐸🇺🇸vor 2 Jahren

@Brian22155Rayl @CommunityNotes

Profilbild von cody sansone

cody sansonevor 2 Jahren

@CommunityNotes Archeologists and most scientists are absolute clowns who will instantly denounce something if it doesn’t fit their narrative.

Profilbild von CRYPTO NEWS

CRYPTO NEWSvor 2 Jahren

@CommunityNotes Thank you for sharing this information. It's important to stay informed about these kinds of things.

Profilbild von Ernie Lo

Ernie Lovor 2 Jahren

@CommunityNotes An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence. It’s the onus of the claimer to provide compelling evidence to prove its existence - one cannot prove non-existence. Until then, it’s fair to say it’s a hoax. And heck, why extra-terrestrials HAVE to be in humanoid form??!!

Profilbild von Blue Eyerish 🇺🇸

Blue Eyerish 🇺🇸vor 2 Jahren

@CommunityNotes 1000 year old stoner

Profilbild von Chester Booty-Fuchs

Chester Booty-Fuchsvor 2 Jahren

@CommunityNotes This is how they cover up ETs. By citing experts who are shills and having them claim they don't believe it could be true and that the people saying it is are liars without any evidence at all. It's just gaslighting.

Profilbild von Jill V

Jill Vvor 2 Jahren

@CommunityNotes It’s as plausible as dinosaurs 🤷🏻‍♀️

Profilbild von I Mosaici della Vita

I Mosaici della Vitavor 2 Jahren

@CommunityNotes "It remains uncertain whether this is a hoax or genuine"...I'm putting my money on Hoax.

Ähnliche Videos

☝️"When the United States created the atomic bomb and the Soviet Union entered the race, actively developing its own nuclear program, it relied on both Russian and foreign scientists, primarily Germans. Soviet intelligence also received a lot of information from the US; suffice it to recall the Rosenberg couple, who were executed in the electric chair. However, they didn't obtain this information; they were merely transferring it. So who did obtain it? The scientists themselves, those who were developing the atomic bomb. Why did they do it? Because they understood the dangers. They had let the genie out of the bottle and knew it couldn't be put back in. I believe this international team of scientists, who were more intelligent than the politicians, provided this information to the Soviet Union of their own volition to restore the nuclear balance in the world. And what are we doing now? We are trying to destroy that balance. And that is a grave mistake." - President Putin.

☝️"When the United States created the atomic bomb and the Soviet Union entered the race, actively developing its own nuclear program, it relied on both Russian and foreign scientists, primarily Germans. Soviet intelligence also received a lot of information from the US; suffice it to recall the Rosenberg couple, who were executed in the electric chair. However, they didn't obtain this information; they were merely transferring it. So who did obtain it? The scientists themselves, those who were developing the atomic bomb. Why did they do it? Because they understood the dangers. They had let the genie out of the bottle and knew it couldn't be put back in. I believe this international team of scientists, who were more intelligent than the politicians, provided this information to the Soviet Union of their own volition to restore the nuclear balance in the world. And what are we doing now? We are trying to destroy that balance. And that is a grave mistake." - President Putin.

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

123,075 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill is launching an investigation into Tim Walz for KNOWING about the Somali fraud for YEARS — in exchange for votes "Walz knew about this fraud in Minnesota since the day he came into office as governor. He's known about this for a decade or so!" "And Democrats had sort of an implicit deal with, with the Somali community there, that they were going to turn their, turn the other way, allow these Somali immigrants to defraud American taxpayers to the tune of billions and billions of dollars." "And in exchange, they expected that Somali community to vote monolithically for Democrats. It was kind of a bargain that Democrats have been doing for a long time and in many other places too." "So what we want to do is bring Tim Walz in and Keith Ellison and ask them, what exactly did you know? And when did you know about this fraud? And how did you know about this fraud? And why didn't you do anything to stop it? And I think that that's something that the American people want to know as well."

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill is launching an investigation into Tim Walz for KNOWING about the Somali fraud for YEARS — in exchange for votes "Walz knew about this fraud in Minnesota since the day he came into office as governor. He's known about this for a decade or so!" "And Democrats had sort of an implicit deal with, with the Somali community there, that they were going to turn their, turn the other way, allow these Somali immigrants to defraud American taxpayers to the tune of billions and billions of dollars." "And in exchange, they expected that Somali community to vote monolithically for Democrats. It was kind of a bargain that Democrats have been doing for a long time and in many other places too." "So what we want to do is bring Tim Walz in and Keith Ellison and ask them, what exactly did you know? And when did you know about this fraud? And how did you know about this fraud? And why didn't you do anything to stop it? And I think that that's something that the American people want to know as well."

Eric Daugherty

46,330 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

THE ATTACK ON SOMALI COMMUNITY FOR FRAUD EXPOSED ON THE DEEN SHOW - How the Somali community has been disproportionately targeted in fraud narratives due to their religious and racial identity, while similar or even larger-scale fraud cases in other communities receive minimal attention. - How Nick Shirley’s documentary about welfare issues in the Somali community gained 112 million views and was amplified by major influencers, yet these same voices remain silent on documented fraud cases involving billions of dollars in the Orthodox Jewish community in New York. - How this selective coverage reveals that the real agenda isn't about addressing fraud, but rather using it as a tool for propaganda and demonization of Muslims.

THE ATTACK ON SOMALI COMMUNITY FOR FRAUD EXPOSED ON THE DEEN SHOW - How the Somali community has been disproportionately targeted in fraud narratives due to their religious and racial identity, while similar or even larger-scale fraud cases in other communities receive minimal attention. - How Nick Shirley’s documentary about welfare issues in the Somali community gained 112 million views and was amplified by major influencers, yet these same voices remain silent on documented fraud cases involving billions of dollars in the Orthodox Jewish community in New York. - How this selective coverage reveals that the real agenda isn't about addressing fraud, but rather using it as a tool for propaganda and demonization of Muslims.

Sulaiman Ahmed

50,011 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I have warned since 2020 that the fake 'Covid' vaccine (not a 'vaccine' under previous criteria) was a bio-weapon (and not the fake 'virus'). Genuine open-minded doctors and scientists (so comparatively few) have been confirming this and linking it among other things to a substance called graphene. Here Dr Wilfredo Stokes in Guatemala presents observations and analysis from his long research into scientific evidence gathered in Guatemala (and elsewhere) about what was inoculated into the world population (for which Trump claims credit to this day) and though all the compulsory PCR tests. Stokes believes this is the 'year of pandemonium' when the self-replicating nano content of the fake vaccines in the body will be activated through a collective electromagnetic 'switch on' and the health consequences blamed on another invented 'virus' or condition. He is not alone in that belief and he urges the scientific community to find a solution to anomalies in blood directly connected to the fake vaccine/PCR test that has already killed and destroyed the health of so many. Much of what he says I have laid out in books since 2020 from the research of other doctors and scientists around the world. Stokes insists that if we wish to preserve the human species we must act now. You must decide what you make of this.

I have warned since 2020 that the fake 'Covid' vaccine (not a 'vaccine' under previous criteria) was a bio-weapon (and not the fake 'virus'). Genuine open-minded doctors and scientists (so comparatively few) have been confirming this and linking it among other things to a substance called graphene. Here Dr Wilfredo Stokes in Guatemala presents observations and analysis from his long research into scientific evidence gathered in Guatemala (and elsewhere) about what was inoculated into the world population (for which Trump claims credit to this day) and though all the compulsory PCR tests. Stokes believes this is the 'year of pandemonium' when the self-replicating nano content of the fake vaccines in the body will be activated through a collective electromagnetic 'switch on' and the health consequences blamed on another invented 'virus' or condition. He is not alone in that belief and he urges the scientific community to find a solution to anomalies in blood directly connected to the fake vaccine/PCR test that has already killed and destroyed the health of so many. Much of what he says I have laid out in books since 2020 from the research of other doctors and scientists around the world. Stokes insists that if we wish to preserve the human species we must act now. You must decide what you make of this.

David Icke

72,294 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

For years, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, has claimed that human-caused climate change has accelerated sea level rise. But that claim is false. There is no scientific evidence of accelerated sea level rise since the mid-19th Century, and thus none showing human-created emissions caused an acceleration in recent decades. This does not mean that climate change isn’t happening. It is. It simply means that it has not caused the sea level to rise at a rate any higher than one would expect without human-caused climate change. Not only that, but the top scientists know this fact and have deliberately misrepresented it for years, deceiving the public. In September, I reported on one of the first global studies of sea level rise that used tide-gauge data, which is the only real-world data that goes back long enough, to the mid-19th Century, that would allow one to detect whether sea level rise had accelerated, decelerated, or remained steady. Since then, I exchanged over 50 emails with one of the world’s leading sea level rise scientists, Robert Kopp from Rutgers University, and heard back from IPCC, NASA, and NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. What I learned shocked me. For years, the world’s top scientists have known that they cannot prove there has been an acceleration of sea level rise, and yet they have told the public that they can. Not only that, in the process of this exchange, I gained a glimpse into how the scientists have been able to mislead journalists, policymakers, and the wider public for so long. You might think this is either old news or unimportant. Some climate scientists in years past have pointed out that the real-world data do not support claims of acceleration. And in recent years, a supposed increase in natural disasters from climate change has eclipsed sea level rise in terms of attention-grabbing headlines. But sea level rise has, since the 1990s, been the main justification for apocalyptic climate claims, and past efforts to debunk sea level rise have failed to show that scientists were deliberately misleading. The media and others have published terrifying maps of the future showing cities underwater. Accelerated sea level is one of the main justifications for predicting very high costs for adapting to climate change. And while good scientists have debunked acceleration claims in the past, they did not clearly show how IPCC scientists engaged in their manipulations. Not only can I prove that the real-world data do not support the claims that there has been an acceleration, I can show that the scientists deliberately misrepresented their research, and how they did it, thanks to my on-the-record email conversation with Kopp of Rutgers.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

For years, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, has claimed that human-caused climate change has accelerated sea level rise. But that claim is false. There is no scientific evidence of accelerated sea level rise since the mid-19th Century, and thus none showing human-created emissions caused an acceleration in recent decades. This does not mean that climate change isn’t happening. It is. It simply means that it has not caused the sea level to rise at a rate any higher than one would expect without human-caused climate change. Not only that, but the top scientists know this fact and have deliberately misrepresented it for years, deceiving the public. In September, I reported on one of the first global studies of sea level rise that used tide-gauge data, which is the only real-world data that goes back long enough, to the mid-19th Century, that would allow one to detect whether sea level rise had accelerated, decelerated, or remained steady. Since then, I exchanged over 50 emails with one of the world’s leading sea level rise scientists, Robert Kopp from Rutgers University, and heard back from IPCC, NASA, and NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. What I learned shocked me. For years, the world’s top scientists have known that they cannot prove there has been an acceleration of sea level rise, and yet they have told the public that they can. Not only that, in the process of this exchange, I gained a glimpse into how the scientists have been able to mislead journalists, policymakers, and the wider public for so long. You might think this is either old news or unimportant. Some climate scientists in years past have pointed out that the real-world data do not support claims of acceleration. And in recent years, a supposed increase in natural disasters from climate change has eclipsed sea level rise in terms of attention-grabbing headlines. But sea level rise has, since the 1990s, been the main justification for apocalyptic climate claims, and past efforts to debunk sea level rise have failed to show that scientists were deliberately misleading. The media and others have published terrifying maps of the future showing cities underwater. Accelerated sea level is one of the main justifications for predicting very high costs for adapting to climate change. And while good scientists have debunked acceleration claims in the past, they did not clearly show how IPCC scientists engaged in their manipulations. Not only can I prove that the real-world data do not support the claims that there has been an acceleration, I can show that the scientists deliberately misrepresented their research, and how they did it, thanks to my on-the-record email conversation with Kopp of Rutgers.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, to read the whole article, and watch the full video! Full version:

Michael Shellenberger

138,172 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Peter MacKay "I think of greater note is the fact that it came 15 or 16 hours after the actual arrest of Maduro" "This is, again, a very slow and lethargic reaction and reflective of a foreign policy that was ambivalent, waiting to see how other countries reacted." "And so I don't think it has put Canada in a particularly good place with the United States or our traditional allies." "...You take these two countries and their malignant influence on other terrorist activities, whether it be narco-terrorism in the case of Venezuela, or using proxies throughout the Middle east and in other countries in Iran, the removal of those dictatorships, totalitarian governments, will have a profound effect on world peace." "People may not like Donald Trump, many don't. But that may in fact be the upshot of all of this is a more peaceful, stable world." Peter MacKay

Peter MacKay "I think of greater note is the fact that it came 15 or 16 hours after the actual arrest of Maduro" "This is, again, a very slow and lethargic reaction and reflective of a foreign policy that was ambivalent, waiting to see how other countries reacted." "And so I don't think it has put Canada in a particularly good place with the United States or our traditional allies." "...You take these two countries and their malignant influence on other terrorist activities, whether it be narco-terrorism in the case of Venezuela, or using proxies throughout the Middle east and in other countries in Iran, the removal of those dictatorships, totalitarian governments, will have a profound effect on world peace." "People may not like Donald Trump, many don't. But that may in fact be the upshot of all of this is a more peaceful, stable world." Peter MacKay

cbcwatcher

119,461 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Once the slaughter is over, and it has to be over, there is an expectation that Palestinians should move on regardless of the lives lost, of the limbs lost, of the loved ones lost. There is an expectation that parents will walk the earth with the shadow of their killed children and do nothing about it. The children who are orphaned will hold onto the memory of their parents but not to the anger over how they were killed. There is an expectation that a nation will be able to move on from the reality of parents carrying their children’s remains in plastic bags, of families buried under the rubble or in the sand they found shelter in after everything else was destroyed. That we will be able to move on as a nation from the images of burning children, of starving infants, of the impact that bombs left behind, on the lives of many Palestinians, on their scarred bodies, in their hearts and minds, of the impact that a single bullet lodged in the child’s head or heart has over an entire family forever. We said long ago, we made a choice, to seek justice not vengeance, but we cannot be prevented from seeking either. We cannot continue to be denied our right to life, to liberty, to dignity. We cannot be denied recourse and reparation. No one has a rightful claim to supremacy, to exceptionalism, to domination, to oppression, no one.

Once the slaughter is over, and it has to be over, there is an expectation that Palestinians should move on regardless of the lives lost, of the limbs lost, of the loved ones lost. There is an expectation that parents will walk the earth with the shadow of their killed children and do nothing about it. The children who are orphaned will hold onto the memory of their parents but not to the anger over how they were killed. There is an expectation that a nation will be able to move on from the reality of parents carrying their children’s remains in plastic bags, of families buried under the rubble or in the sand they found shelter in after everything else was destroyed. That we will be able to move on as a nation from the images of burning children, of starving infants, of the impact that bombs left behind, on the lives of many Palestinians, on their scarred bodies, in their hearts and minds, of the impact that a single bullet lodged in the child’s head or heart has over an entire family forever. We said long ago, we made a choice, to seek justice not vengeance, but we cannot be prevented from seeking either. We cannot continue to be denied our right to life, to liberty, to dignity. We cannot be denied recourse and reparation. No one has a rightful claim to supremacy, to exceptionalism, to domination, to oppression, no one.

Ambassador Majed Bamya 🇵🇸

128,298 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

November 5, 2021 CDC Director Walensky said that masks reduce the risk of COVID infection by 80%. This was not supportable under any conceivable interpretation of the evidence. Yet the scientific and medical communities supported this and many other lies. They have never apologized or taken responsibility. Today they claim science is "under attack". But how can the scientific community tell the public to "believe in science", when the scientific community has itself shown that it does not believe in science?

November 5, 2021 CDC Director Walensky said that masks reduce the risk of COVID infection by 80%. This was not supportable under any conceivable interpretation of the evidence. Yet the scientific and medical communities supported this and many other lies. They have never apologized or taken responsibility. Today they claim science is "under attack". But how can the scientific community tell the public to "believe in science", when the scientific community has itself shown that it does not believe in science?

Kevin Bass

34,973 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is the biggest concern and by the way people need to stop saying that there was no election rigging in 2020/2024. Trump rigged the elections in 2020 and 2024. There's data that shows this happened. It was analyzed and peer reviewed and the guys who created the models said that the data was analyzed correctly. I know because I was in the meetings I worked with the Election Truth Alliance for 7 months while the data was analyzed and created and verified. But they're right it wasn't voter fraud it was tabulator fraud. Here's a quick video 1 minute 47 seconds I hope anyone who sees this will watch it and you will see an early vote in Nevada algorithmic manipulation of the count of the ballots. Only in the early vote. Note: Risk limiting audits would never catch this. You also can only see it if you separate the votes types which states don't do. And I'm pretty sure I know how it was done and it wouldn't require many people.

This is the biggest concern and by the way people need to stop saying that there was no election rigging in 2020/2024. Trump rigged the elections in 2020 and 2024. There's data that shows this happened. It was analyzed and peer reviewed and the guys who created the models said that the data was analyzed correctly. I know because I was in the meetings I worked with the Election Truth Alliance for 7 months while the data was analyzed and created and verified. But they're right it wasn't voter fraud it was tabulator fraud. Here's a quick video 1 minute 47 seconds I hope anyone who sees this will watch it and you will see an early vote in Nevada algorithmic manipulation of the count of the ballots. Only in the early vote. Note: Risk limiting audits would never catch this. You also can only see it if you separate the votes types which states don't do. And I'm pretty sure I know how it was done and it wouldn't require many people.

Kristine (@schachin on Threads) 🇺🇦

25,393 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

#WATCH | Uttar Pradesh: Addressing a public rally in Aligarh, PM Narendra Modi says, "I want to warn the countrymen. Congress and the INDI alliance have their eyes on your earnings and your property. The 'Shehzada' of Congress says that if their government comes to power, they will investigate who earns how much, who has how many properties...Our mothers and sisters have gold. It is 'stree dhan', it is considered sacred, the law also protects it. Now these people's eyes are on the 'Mangalsutra' of women. Their intention is to steal the gold of mothers and sisters... If you have an old ancestor's home in your village and you also purchased a small flat in your city for the future of your children. Then they will take away one of the two...This is Maovadi thinking, this is the thinking of communists. By doing this they have already ruined many countries. Now this same policy the Congress Party and INDI alliance want to implement in India..."

#WATCH | Uttar Pradesh: Addressing a public rally in Aligarh, PM Narendra Modi says, "I want to warn the countrymen. Congress and the INDI alliance have their eyes on your earnings and your property. The 'Shehzada' of Congress says that if their government comes to power, they will investigate who earns how much, who has how many properties...Our mothers and sisters have gold. It is 'stree dhan', it is considered sacred, the law also protects it. Now these people's eyes are on the 'Mangalsutra' of women. Their intention is to steal the gold of mothers and sisters... If you have an old ancestor's home in your village and you also purchased a small flat in your city for the future of your children. Then they will take away one of the two...This is Maovadi thinking, this is the thinking of communists. By doing this they have already ruined many countries. Now this same policy the Congress Party and INDI alliance want to implement in India..."

ANI

504,876 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Many in the Tesla community swore up and down that the sun wasn’t an issue on HW4 cars and the problem was only on HW3 cars. I went LIVE here on 𝕏 in a Model Y Juniper with HW4 and demonstrated how the sun can be a problem and the Red Hands of Death will activate instructing the human to take over immediately. Now people are admitting the sun can be a problem but only after I’ve proven it LIVE. This has happened with other FSD issues in the past. I prove them wrong and all of a sudden they admit it’s an issue after denying it for months. Please stop with the dishonesty in the Tesla community!

Many in the Tesla community swore up and down that the sun wasn’t an issue on HW4 cars and the problem was only on HW3 cars. I went LIVE here on 𝕏 in a Model Y Juniper with HW4 and demonstrated how the sun can be a problem and the Red Hands of Death will activate instructing the human to take over immediately. Now people are admitting the sun can be a problem but only after I’ve proven it LIVE. This has happened with other FSD issues in the past. I prove them wrong and all of a sudden they admit it’s an issue after denying it for months. Please stop with the dishonesty in the Tesla community!

Miss Jilianne

251,733 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

1940s - A charming look at pubs and their many uses during the 1940s. See if you can recognise any of these stunning beauties. Pubs were once used for a great many things other than community building and drinking. This documentary highlights how the system once acknowledged that public houses were the very backbone of #Britain. Be it war, or peacetime, our taverns and inns were envied worldwide. Wouldn't it be nice to not only see a return of this culture, but for it to be appreciated by the people with the power to protect them. The Narrator begins by discussing the relevance of pub signs and how far they date back. Give it a watch and a share in the hope others who also love our pubs find and enjoy this clip. 🤝🍻

1940s - A charming look at pubs and their many uses during the 1940s. See if you can recognise any of these stunning beauties. Pubs were once used for a great many things other than community building and drinking. This documentary highlights how the system once acknowledged that public houses were the very backbone of #Britain. Be it war, or peacetime, our taverns and inns were envied worldwide. Wouldn't it be nice to not only see a return of this culture, but for it to be appreciated by the people with the power to protect them. The Narrator begins by discussing the relevance of pub signs and how far they date back. Give it a watch and a share in the hope others who also love our pubs find and enjoy this clip. 🤝🍻

Britain's Lost & Living Pubs

10,949 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Journal of Health Communication editor-in-chief on the Fauci hearing... "[P]ublic service and public servants should be respected. Everyone who is in that hearing and meeting room. But what's happened is this is an assault on science and scientists. And unfortunately, Dr. Fauci is in that seat. 38 years of service to the country. One of the best -known scientists for infectious disease, unfortunately, has taken a lot of heat for probably a lot of shall we say, issues that were not fully his. He didn't make all the decisions that drove the COVID pandemic. But you are right that he is one of the most respected scientists and should be respected in that same sort of way today. We certainly didn't learn anything from the way the hearing was held."

Journal of Health Communication editor-in-chief on the Fauci hearing... "[P]ublic service and public servants should be respected. Everyone who is in that hearing and meeting room. But what's happened is this is an assault on science and scientists. And unfortunately, Dr. Fauci is in that seat. 38 years of service to the country. One of the best -known scientists for infectious disease, unfortunately, has taken a lot of heat for probably a lot of shall we say, issues that were not fully his. He didn't make all the decisions that drove the COVID pandemic. But you are right that he is one of the most respected scientists and should be respected in that same sort of way today. We certainly didn't learn anything from the way the hearing was held."

Curtis Houck

34,467 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

🚨 MISSING SCIENTISTS, METEORITES, GLOBAL ENERGY & IRAN WAR CONNECTION!? 🚨 Pure science and logic points to a fascinating, perhaps disturbing, potential connection between the recent deaths and disappearances of scientists and nuclear, oil and energy (Iran) wars & recent meteorite showers across the US In 2017 scientists confirmed that the heaviest elements on Earth - gold uranium and the building blocks of nuclear power, are forged in neutron star collisions. Plasma fusion energy would obliterate the economic advantage and power of energy oil cartels These two statements cover the two scientific areas the two recently murdered US scientists specialised in Nuclear material and fusion energy require specific elements (uranium, iridium ... ) They are not 'made' on earth but over decades and centuries in space. When a neutron star collision occurs this produces fragments that burn through the atmosphere as fireballs or bolides - meteorites like those seen over California, Ohio and Texas recently Many Iranian nuclear scientists have been assassinated on record in recent years. But of course nobody can put all these jigsaw pieces together and claim a connection What we do know is that Trump media group bought a plasma fusion specialist company, TAE, just days after the murder of MIT scientist Nuno Loreiro and that the NASA award winning scientist who suffered the same fate just weeks later was a neutron star expert You can see why I cannot go into much detail or make any claims but I will leave the curious coincidences open for your own judgement. Dark Journalist Ashton Forbes UAP James and others are ready doing some great research in these areas and I suggest you look at their profiles and stories too. You know that this subject is sensitive and will not be looked on favourably by the algorithm so I would also appreciate reposts and quote posts with my thanks #Energy #Scientists

🚨 MISSING SCIENTISTS, METEORITES, GLOBAL ENERGY & IRAN WAR CONNECTION!? 🚨 Pure science and logic points to a fascinating, perhaps disturbing, potential connection between the recent deaths and disappearances of scientists and nuclear, oil and energy (Iran) wars & recent meteorite showers across the US In 2017 scientists confirmed that the heaviest elements on Earth - gold uranium and the building blocks of nuclear power, are forged in neutron star collisions. Plasma fusion energy would obliterate the economic advantage and power of energy oil cartels These two statements cover the two scientific areas the two recently murdered US scientists specialised in Nuclear material and fusion energy require specific elements (uranium, iridium ... ) They are not 'made' on earth but over decades and centuries in space. When a neutron star collision occurs this produces fragments that burn through the atmosphere as fireballs or bolides - meteorites like those seen over California, Ohio and Texas recently Many Iranian nuclear scientists have been assassinated on record in recent years. But of course nobody can put all these jigsaw pieces together and claim a connection What we do know is that Trump media group bought a plasma fusion specialist company, TAE, just days after the murder of MIT scientist Nuno Loreiro and that the NASA award winning scientist who suffered the same fate just weeks later was a neutron star expert You can see why I cannot go into much detail or make any claims but I will leave the curious coincidences open for your own judgement. Dark Journalist Ashton Forbes UAP James and others are ready doing some great research in these areas and I suggest you look at their profiles and stories too. You know that this subject is sensitive and will not be looked on favourably by the algorithm so I would also appreciate reposts and quote posts with my thanks #Energy #Scientists

Moneypenny

53,489 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

On Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D., Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), explains how reshaping incentives toward transparency and open data is key to rebuilding a culture of trust in science. "We reward scientists for the influence that they have, and we reward scientists for the volume of papers they publish. What we don't reward scientists for is honesty about their failures." "The failure to replicate is seen as a failure of the scientist rather than the fact that science is hard." "The right solution is not root out the fraud. The right solution is change the incentives of science so that we, as scientists, engage in pro-social behavior, meaning behavior that rewards truth rather than rewards volume and influence alone."

On Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D., Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, the director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), explains how reshaping incentives toward transparency and open data is key to rebuilding a culture of trust in science. "We reward scientists for the influence that they have, and we reward scientists for the volume of papers they publish. What we don't reward scientists for is honesty about their failures." "The failure to replicate is seen as a failure of the scientist rather than the fact that science is hard." "The right solution is not root out the fraud. The right solution is change the incentives of science so that we, as scientists, engage in pro-social behavior, meaning behavior that rewards truth rather than rewards volume and influence alone."

Huberman Lab Clips

74,895 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#BREAKING: Legendary #Maddow: “18 patients from that #Hantavirus-stricken cruise ship have been brought back to the United States now. What do you think the odds are, that the Trump administration will contend with that risk in ways that are sane, and organized, and even vaguely scientific? This is the Trump administration that FIRED THOUSANDS of scientists from the CDC, scientists in particular who work on infectious diseases and all sorts of global health concerns. Also, they fired the people who work SPECIFICALLY on the issue of viruses spreading on cruise ships.”🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING: Legendary #Maddow: “18 patients from that #Hantavirus-stricken cruise ship have been brought back to the United States now. What do you think the odds are, that the Trump administration will contend with that risk in ways that are sane, and organized, and even vaguely scientific? This is the Trump administration that FIRED THOUSANDS of scientists from the CDC, scientists in particular who work on infectious diseases and all sorts of global health concerns. Also, they fired the people who work SPECIFICALLY on the issue of viruses spreading on cruise ships.”🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

19,755 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

$Deceased anti gravity researcher Amy Eskridge said the missing and dead scientists are the results of timeline wars, she said this in 2021 Eerie given that her name is being floated in the conversations around missing scientists, even by people like Congressman Eric Burlison “My point is that the loudest focus around the UAP topic is currently directed towards the technology of the observed craft. But that's missing the point. If they are here at all, it's surely for some very good reason that has nothing to do with their propulsion tech. In looking for the answers behind this phenomena, we have focused too much on the "effect" (the current presence of UAP craft) and not enough on the "cause" behind WHY they might be here. In general, the "why" behind most intelligent actions usually comes down to some survival based need. So what survival based need might these craft have to be here? The greys are from the future, they evolved after the cataclysm, and want to ensure their future existence. OK. Another earlier faction of travelers would prefer for us all to stay human by preventing this cataclysm. Ok. But what is the "why" that has generated this whole situation? The atmosphere gets royally fucked up in the future, and creates an evolutionary divergence. Some would like this divergence to continue to occur, and some would like to stop it. But the "cause" that generates this divergence is the atmosphere getting fucked up, and how the chemistry of the new atmosphere interacts with our bodies to cause us to change. THAT either happening or not happening is what matters most to the greys. And that's an issue of chemistry and biology, not so much physics. So the BIGGEST issue on our minds shouldn't necessarily be trying to figure out the technology behind the craft. That's important, but still missing the point. If the greys had strategic targets that they'd like to travel back in time to ice well in advance, it wouldn't necessarily be targets who were into physics. It would more likely be targets who understand climate science and biology and all the other critical elements of the cataclysm that cause the greys to either evolve into themselves or not. The people who might know how to reverse or prevent atmospheric catastrophe, or how to harden our bodies against it and survive it etc. Whether the cause of the atmospheric cataclysm is caused by an asteroid or something else, it all comes down to the chemistry of what we breathe and how it interacts with our bodies to either evolve the survivors into the greys or not. None of which is related to the propulsion tech of the UAPs, that is a secondary distraction. We have up until now failed ourselves by super epically missing the point. My local anecdote about dead scientists who were laid off by a NASA MSFC Biology Department only to be massacred years later is an example of this. A timeline war is surely a great example of "unconventional warfare." This particular type of unconventional warfare includes future information that allows you to take out targets many years before their individual relevance to the conflict is able to become obvious. Anyone who wants to understand the motivations and objectives of this particular timeline war just needs to google "dead scientists" and figure out what they all have in common. There actually is a great website that has been diligently recording mysterious deaths of scientists, going back to cases 20 years or longer ago. Plot twist - most of these "dead scientists" aren't physicists, although some of them are. But a complete list of mysteriously dead scientists includes biologists, climatologists, virologists, chemists, material scientists, agricultural scientists etc etc. Killed by random drive by shootings, cars exploding, sudden unexplained illnesses that kill them within a matter of days, home entries where nothing is stolen but they end up dead anyway, getting hit by a car as they walk down the sidewalk, disappearing and being found in the river, etc etc etc. Most of them told someone that they were scared shortly before they died of these random events of violence. None of these cases are provably traced back to intentional assassination, due to a clean getaway or lack of evidence. Future information certainly helps you figure out how to get away with it. But it seems like scientists tend to die of random acts of violence more often than the general population, and the dead are not all UAP physicists, in fact most of them aren't. Many of them are people like the former NASA Biology personnel who became professors at UAH only to get freaking massacred as a group years later. If you really wanna understand the objectives of the timeline war, then you need to figure out which scientists are dying off in the early or mid stages of their careers, and WHY. You can figure it out just by reading the prior papers of these randomly violently dead people and by extrapolating where their research may have led to ten or 20 years in the future if they had lived. You know how these things are. You know a hit when you see one, even if you can't prove it. Those deaths that just don't make any sense at all, even as random acts of violence. Those seemingly random tragedies that just happen to be occurring over and over and over again within pretty specific communities of study. That is a very large fraction of how the unconventional warfare of this conflict is being carried out. What no one fully recognizes is that we are currently fighting this war massively understaffed. Key personnel have been repeatedly taken out years in advance. And now we are here, understaffed. It's a very tight and thin crew of expertise that's still left over to deal with the problems that remain.” Email originally released by Franc Milburn$

Deceased anti gravity researcher Amy Eskridge said the missing and dead scientists are the results of timeline wars, she said this in 2021 Eerie given that her name is being floated in the conversations around missing scientists, even by people like Congressman Eric Burlison “My point is that the loudest focus around the UAP topic is currently directed towards the technology of the observed craft. But that's missing the point. If they are here at all, it's surely for some very good reason that has nothing to do with their propulsion tech. In looking for the answers behind this phenomena, we have focused too much on the "effect" (the current presence of UAP craft) and not enough on the "cause" behind WHY they might be here. In general, the "why" behind most intelligent actions usually comes down to some survival based need. So what survival based need might these craft have to be here? The greys are from the future, they evolved after the cataclysm, and want to ensure their future existence. OK. Another earlier faction of travelers would prefer for us all to stay human by preventing this cataclysm. Ok. But what is the "why" that has generated this whole situation? The atmosphere gets royally fucked up in the future, and creates an evolutionary divergence. Some would like this divergence to continue to occur, and some would like to stop it. But the "cause" that generates this divergence is the atmosphere getting fucked up, and how the chemistry of the new atmosphere interacts with our bodies to cause us to change. THAT either happening or not happening is what matters most to the greys. And that's an issue of chemistry and biology, not so much physics. So the BIGGEST issue on our minds shouldn't necessarily be trying to figure out the technology behind the craft. That's important, but still missing the point. If the greys had strategic targets that they'd like to travel back in time to ice well in advance, it wouldn't necessarily be targets who were into physics. It would more likely be targets who understand climate science and biology and all the other critical elements of the cataclysm that cause the greys to either evolve into themselves or not. The people who might know how to reverse or prevent atmospheric catastrophe, or how to harden our bodies against it and survive it etc. Whether the cause of the atmospheric cataclysm is caused by an asteroid or something else, it all comes down to the chemistry of what we breathe and how it interacts with our bodies to either evolve the survivors into the greys or not. None of which is related to the propulsion tech of the UAPs, that is a secondary distraction. We have up until now failed ourselves by super epically missing the point. My local anecdote about dead scientists who were laid off by a NASA MSFC Biology Department only to be massacred years later is an example of this. A timeline war is surely a great example of "unconventional warfare." This particular type of unconventional warfare includes future information that allows you to take out targets many years before their individual relevance to the conflict is able to become obvious. Anyone who wants to understand the motivations and objectives of this particular timeline war just needs to google "dead scientists" and figure out what they all have in common. There actually is a great website that has been diligently recording mysterious deaths of scientists, going back to cases 20 years or longer ago. Plot twist - most of these "dead scientists" aren't physicists, although some of them are. But a complete list of mysteriously dead scientists includes biologists, climatologists, virologists, chemists, material scientists, agricultural scientists etc etc. Killed by random drive by shootings, cars exploding, sudden unexplained illnesses that kill them within a matter of days, home entries where nothing is stolen but they end up dead anyway, getting hit by a car as they walk down the sidewalk, disappearing and being found in the river, etc etc etc. Most of them told someone that they were scared shortly before they died of these random events of violence. None of these cases are provably traced back to intentional assassination, due to a clean getaway or lack of evidence. Future information certainly helps you figure out how to get away with it. But it seems like scientists tend to die of random acts of violence more often than the general population, and the dead are not all UAP physicists, in fact most of them aren't. Many of them are people like the former NASA Biology personnel who became professors at UAH only to get freaking massacred as a group years later. If you really wanna understand the objectives of the timeline war, then you need to figure out which scientists are dying off in the early or mid stages of their careers, and WHY. You can figure it out just by reading the prior papers of these randomly violently dead people and by extrapolating where their research may have led to ten or 20 years in the future if they had lived. You know how these things are. You know a hit when you see one, even if you can't prove it. Those deaths that just don't make any sense at all, even as random acts of violence. Those seemingly random tragedies that just happen to be occurring over and over and over again within pretty specific communities of study. That is a very large fraction of how the unconventional warfare of this conflict is being carried out. What no one fully recognizes is that we are currently fighting this war massively understaffed. Key personnel have been repeatedly taken out years in advance. And now we are here, understaffed. It's a very tight and thin crew of expertise that's still left over to deal with the problems that remain.” Email originally released by Franc Milburn

Red Panda Koala

104,032 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

TULSI GABBARD EXPOSES THE INTEL COMMUNITY AND DEM PLOT AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP GABBARD: It is always the right time to expose the truth to the American people about the deep state tactics that have been used time and time again, fundamentally to undermine the foundational principles of our Republic, and in so many cases, to undermine the decisions that the American people make when they cast their votes in our elections to decide who they want to lead our country. And so the documents that we released really pointed to the fact that the 2019 impeachment occurred because there were members of the intelligence community working directly with House Democrats, specifically Adam Schiff, who's on the House Intelligence Committee at the time, concocting this narrative, weaponizing the whistleblower process, lying and abusing their power, all to create this manufactured basis that Nancy Pelosi then used to drive this impeachment against Donald Trump in 2019. I'll hit the high points on these documents. There are details and hundreds of pages of transcripts that we released in conjunction with House Intel Chairman Rick Crawford, but the bottom line is this. Number one, the whistleblower, so-called whistleblower, who came forward, presented no evidence and no firsthand knowledge. This is a person who had heard about a conversation that President Trump had with Zelensky, then went straight to Adam Schiff on the House Intelligence Committee. This is where they came up with this false narrative, and this so-called whistleblower then went and filed a complaint with the Intelligence Community Inspector General. The other witness, so-called witness to this, is somebody who also had zero firsthand knowledge and presented zero evidence, someone who was also a co-author of the 2017 Russia hoax intelligence community assessment that President Obama had. And someone who said that even after reading the transcript, he didn't really see the issue there until the whistleblower had explained it to him. And lastly, the Inspector General himself, and this is really such a violation of public trust and the responsibility that we expect all of our inspectors general to have in that he didn't conduct a full investigation. He didn't even ask to see the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and Zelensky, and he admitted to Congress that he didn't have any proof. He did not have any evidence that he was relying on. He had made a criminal referral to the Department of Justice based on this so-called whistleblower's complaint. The Department of Justice came back and said there's nothing here. This inspector general then went to Congress anyway.

TULSI GABBARD EXPOSES THE INTEL COMMUNITY AND DEM PLOT AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP GABBARD: It is always the right time to expose the truth to the American people about the deep state tactics that have been used time and time again, fundamentally to undermine the foundational principles of our Republic, and in so many cases, to undermine the decisions that the American people make when they cast their votes in our elections to decide who they want to lead our country. And so the documents that we released really pointed to the fact that the 2019 impeachment occurred because there were members of the intelligence community working directly with House Democrats, specifically Adam Schiff, who's on the House Intelligence Committee at the time, concocting this narrative, weaponizing the whistleblower process, lying and abusing their power, all to create this manufactured basis that Nancy Pelosi then used to drive this impeachment against Donald Trump in 2019. I'll hit the high points on these documents. There are details and hundreds of pages of transcripts that we released in conjunction with House Intel Chairman Rick Crawford, but the bottom line is this. Number one, the whistleblower, so-called whistleblower, who came forward, presented no evidence and no firsthand knowledge. This is a person who had heard about a conversation that President Trump had with Zelensky, then went straight to Adam Schiff on the House Intelligence Committee. This is where they came up with this false narrative, and this so-called whistleblower then went and filed a complaint with the Intelligence Community Inspector General. The other witness, so-called witness to this, is somebody who also had zero firsthand knowledge and presented zero evidence, someone who was also a co-author of the 2017 Russia hoax intelligence community assessment that President Obama had. And someone who said that even after reading the transcript, he didn't really see the issue there until the whistleblower had explained it to him. And lastly, the Inspector General himself, and this is really such a violation of public trust and the responsibility that we expect all of our inspectors general to have in that he didn't conduct a full investigation. He didn't even ask to see the transcript of the phone call between President Trump and Zelensky, and he admitted to Congress that he didn't have any proof. He did not have any evidence that he was relying on. He had made a criminal referral to the Department of Justice based on this so-called whistleblower's complaint. The Department of Justice came back and said there's nothing here. This inspector general then went to Congress anyway.

Svetlana Lokhova

48,978 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Can We Now Talk About Voter Fraud, Or Is That Still Forbidden? | David Strom, HotAir Soon enough, after the Democrats mostly give up on defending the most obvious welfare fraud in Minnesota and elsewhere, we will see them pivot to "it's isolated and rare." In fact, many of the Democrats and their Pravda propagandists have already half-pivoted, still claiming that the fraud is actually small, and that there is no systemic problem. It's a few bad apples, and be afraid of white men anyway. They are racists and xenophobes, right? But the fact is that this, and no doubt many other states, are organized around the perpetration of many frauds—the pillaging of billions of dollars from taxpayers, in much the same way that USAID was, and with many of the same propaganda techniques. "Think of the children!" But you don't get 50% or more of all Medicaid funds being disbursed fraudulently without it being what amounts to organized crime, and crime that has at least the implicit, and often explicit support of high-level government officials. They designed and implemented the programs to facilitate fraud. Well, folks, I have news for you. The same is true for our election system. In places like Minnesota, there are precisely zero checks on the validity of votes, and relatively few on the security of the ballots. We don't check IDs; people can vouch for the legality of up to 8 people each. Mail-in ballots have no checks on their validity. Votes get counted without signatures, and they not only never clean up the voter rolls but also actively fight against legally required efforts to do so. Most people don't know this, but in order to facilitate illegal immigration, you can now get a driver's license with no identification at all. You can vote with no evidence that you live in the precinct. A volunteer can waltz in with 8 "voters" who speak no English, have their faces covered, and have no evidence of citizenship or even residency in the precinct and "vouch" for them. In the last election, when my wife and I went to vote, a man walked out with us and begged for bus fare to get back home on the other side of the city. You can't make it up. Democrats often point to the relative paucity of "evidence" that voter fraud is happening (there is much more than the media tells you), but the fact is that the system is designed not to collect any evidence at all. A few years back, a ballot security activist tracked down the "residences" of suspicious voters and found that many of the addresses reported either didn't exist or were businesses. Homeless shelters often have hundreds of registered voters at their location, despite having capacities in the tens. The system is designed to create fraud, almost exclusively in the urban areas where the Democrats control the entire chain from registration to counting. Nursing homes are a great place to commit fraud, since one person there can vouch for the identity of every single resident, and I personally know that one person will sign the voter book for everybody there because I have seen it with my own eyes during the Norm Coleman recount. When I pointed out that the signatures were all in the same handwriting, the county auditor just said, "Oh, that's OK, it's a nursing home." For God's sake. Tens of votes decided the election. Who knows how many were fraudulent? We've all seen the videos of people stuffing ballot boxes. Yes, there were "mules" who collected ballots and delivered them in the middle of the night. You would think that people would understand the transitive property of fraud—if you see it rampant in one area, you should suspect it elsewhere when the same people are involved. Do you think that they scammed you over here but wouldn't DARE over there, especially since winning those elections makes their profitable fraud possible? How stupid or blind can you be? Minnesota's Attorney General bragged on Somali TV that he would not be the Attorney General without the votes of Somalis—the very Somalis he helped scam the taxpayers to the tune of $10 billion or more. Do you think he is vigorously investigating voter fraud?

Can We Now Talk About Voter Fraud, Or Is That Still Forbidden? | David Strom, HotAir Soon enough, after the Democrats mostly give up on defending the most obvious welfare fraud in Minnesota and elsewhere, we will see them pivot to "it's isolated and rare." In fact, many of the Democrats and their Pravda propagandists have already half-pivoted, still claiming that the fraud is actually small, and that there is no systemic problem. It's a few bad apples, and be afraid of white men anyway. They are racists and xenophobes, right? But the fact is that this, and no doubt many other states, are organized around the perpetration of many frauds—the pillaging of billions of dollars from taxpayers, in much the same way that USAID was, and with many of the same propaganda techniques. "Think of the children!" But you don't get 50% or more of all Medicaid funds being disbursed fraudulently without it being what amounts to organized crime, and crime that has at least the implicit, and often explicit support of high-level government officials. They designed and implemented the programs to facilitate fraud. Well, folks, I have news for you. The same is true for our election system. In places like Minnesota, there are precisely zero checks on the validity of votes, and relatively few on the security of the ballots. We don't check IDs; people can vouch for the legality of up to 8 people each. Mail-in ballots have no checks on their validity. Votes get counted without signatures, and they not only never clean up the voter rolls but also actively fight against legally required efforts to do so. Most people don't know this, but in order to facilitate illegal immigration, you can now get a driver's license with no identification at all. You can vote with no evidence that you live in the precinct. A volunteer can waltz in with 8 "voters" who speak no English, have their faces covered, and have no evidence of citizenship or even residency in the precinct and "vouch" for them. In the last election, when my wife and I went to vote, a man walked out with us and begged for bus fare to get back home on the other side of the city. You can't make it up. Democrats often point to the relative paucity of "evidence" that voter fraud is happening (there is much more than the media tells you), but the fact is that the system is designed not to collect any evidence at all. A few years back, a ballot security activist tracked down the "residences" of suspicious voters and found that many of the addresses reported either didn't exist or were businesses. Homeless shelters often have hundreds of registered voters at their location, despite having capacities in the tens. The system is designed to create fraud, almost exclusively in the urban areas where the Democrats control the entire chain from registration to counting. Nursing homes are a great place to commit fraud, since one person there can vouch for the identity of every single resident, and I personally know that one person will sign the voter book for everybody there because I have seen it with my own eyes during the Norm Coleman recount. When I pointed out that the signatures were all in the same handwriting, the county auditor just said, "Oh, that's OK, it's a nursing home." For God's sake. Tens of votes decided the election. Who knows how many were fraudulent? We've all seen the videos of people stuffing ballot boxes. Yes, there were "mules" who collected ballots and delivered them in the middle of the night. You would think that people would understand the transitive property of fraud—if you see it rampant in one area, you should suspect it elsewhere when the same people are involved. Do you think that they scammed you over here but wouldn't DARE over there, especially since winning those elections makes their profitable fraud possible? How stupid or blind can you be? Minnesota's Attorney General bragged on Somali TV that he would not be the Attorney General without the votes of Somalis—the very Somalis he helped scam the taxpayers to the tune of $10 billion or more. Do you think he is vigorously investigating voter fraud?

Owen Gregorian

90,673 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten