Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

COMPLETE MODINOMICS EXPOSED BY ANURAG DHANDA 🔥 MANAK: EVs are the long-term solution. Do you use one? ANURAG 🎯: Long-distance EV travel is still a problem. And even there, we depend on China. Years of Atmanirbhar slogans collapsed in one crisis. MANAK: BJP says Punjab should cut VAT. ANURAG... show more

Mr Sharma

22,325 subscribers

47,119 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

THIS IS COMPLETE FUEL PRICE EXPOSE 🔥 SHREYA: Centre says it cut excise duty. Why don’t opposition states cut VAT? ANMOL PANWAR 🎯: Give Punjab its pending GST share today, we’ll cut VAT. Our money is stuck, but the Centre keeps profit and asks opposition states to take the hit. SHREYA: Is the central government helpless? ANMOL 🔥: Not at all. The people are helpless because the government they elected is fooling them in broad daylight. SHREYA: But oil companies are saying they are making losses. ANMOL ⚡️: Then why did state-run oil companies report a 41% jump in quarterly profit? Crude is down to $86, but petrol is still ₹100+. This is not a global crisis.

THIS IS COMPLETE FUEL PRICE EXPOSE 🔥 SHREYA: Centre says it cut excise duty. Why don’t opposition states cut VAT? ANMOL PANWAR 🎯: Give Punjab its pending GST share today, we’ll cut VAT. Our money is stuck, but the Centre keeps profit and asks opposition states to take the hit. SHREYA: Is the central government helpless? ANMOL 🔥: Not at all. The people are helpless because the government they elected is fooling them in broad daylight. SHREYA: But oil companies are saying they are making losses. ANMOL ⚡️: Then why did state-run oil companies report a 41% jump in quarterly profit? Crude is down to $86, but petrol is still ₹100+. This is not a global crisis.

Mr Sharma

26,142 views • 2 months ago

Great to see Modi 3.0 🔥 What a powerful exposed by Modi Government...🫡 On the recent report of Hindenburg Research, BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad says, "Today we want to raise some issues. Whose investment is there in Hindenburg? Do you know this gentleman George Soros who regularly runs propaganda against India...He is the main investor there...In their pathological hatred against Narendra Modi, the Congress Party today has developed hatred against India itself. If India's stock market gets disturbed, will the small investors be troubled or not?...In the politics of the Congress party, there is one toolkit politics, the other is chit politics. If chits are found in the exam, action is taken. But what should be done about the chits that the Congress party and its leaders get?...They want to crash the entire stock market, stop the capital investment of small investors and ensure that there should be no economic investment in India..."

Great to see Modi 3.0 🔥 What a powerful exposed by Modi Government...🫡 On the recent report of Hindenburg Research, BJP MP Ravi Shankar Prasad says, "Today we want to raise some issues. Whose investment is there in Hindenburg? Do you know this gentleman George Soros who regularly runs propaganda against India...He is the main investor there...In their pathological hatred against Narendra Modi, the Congress Party today has developed hatred against India itself. If India's stock market gets disturbed, will the small investors be troubled or not?...In the politics of the Congress party, there is one toolkit politics, the other is chit politics. If chits are found in the exam, action is taken. But what should be done about the chits that the Congress party and its leaders get?...They want to crash the entire stock market, stop the capital investment of small investors and ensure that there should be no economic investment in India..."

Aryans Vedas

253,138 views • 2 years ago

#WATCH | BJP National President and Union Health Minister JP Nadda says, "It is indeed very unfortunate that former Congress president Rahul Gandhi and current president Mallikarjun Kharge are not refraining from doing politics even on the sad demise of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Congress, which never gave respect to Dr Manmohan Singh while he was alive, is now doing politics in the name of his respect. This is the same Congress which tarnished the dignity of the post of PM by placing Sonia Gandhi as super PM above PM Manmohan Singh. Rahul Gandhi insulted PM Manmohan Singh by tearing the ordinance. And today the same Rahul Gandhi is doing politics. The Gandhi family has neither given respect to any big leader of the country nor done justice to them. Whether it is from the Congress party or the opposition, whether it is Baba Saheb Ambedkar, the country's first President Rajendra Babu, Sardar Patel, Lal Bahadur Shastri, PV Narasimha Rao, Pranab Da, Atal Bihari Vajpayee...The government under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has given place for PM Manmohan Singh's Samadhi and has also informed the family. Still, Congress is spreading false news. It is necessary to remember the history of Congress. After the death of former Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao, there was a demand to build a Samadhi Sthal in Delhi's Rajghat complex. But at that time Sonia Gandhi had rejected it... It was Prime Minister Narendra Modi who established a memorial for him in 2015... When former President Bharat Ratna Dr Pranab Mukherjee passed away in 2020, the Congress Working Committee did not even bother to call a condolence meeting...Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge and other Congress party leaders should refrain from such cheap politics."

#WATCH | BJP National President and Union Health Minister JP Nadda says, "It is indeed very unfortunate that former Congress president Rahul Gandhi and current president Mallikarjun Kharge are not refraining from doing politics even on the sad demise of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Congress, which never gave respect to Dr Manmohan Singh while he was alive, is now doing politics in the name of his respect. This is the same Congress which tarnished the dignity of the post of PM by placing Sonia Gandhi as super PM above PM Manmohan Singh. Rahul Gandhi insulted PM Manmohan Singh by tearing the ordinance. And today the same Rahul Gandhi is doing politics. The Gandhi family has neither given respect to any big leader of the country nor done justice to them. Whether it is from the Congress party or the opposition, whether it is Baba Saheb Ambedkar, the country's first President Rajendra Babu, Sardar Patel, Lal Bahadur Shastri, PV Narasimha Rao, Pranab Da, Atal Bihari Vajpayee...The government under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has given place for PM Manmohan Singh's Samadhi and has also informed the family. Still, Congress is spreading false news. It is necessary to remember the history of Congress. After the death of former Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao, there was a demand to build a Samadhi Sthal in Delhi's Rajghat complex. But at that time Sonia Gandhi had rejected it... It was Prime Minister Narendra Modi who established a memorial for him in 2015... When former President Bharat Ratna Dr Pranab Mukherjee passed away in 2020, the Congress Working Committee did not even bother to call a condolence meeting...Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge and other Congress party leaders should refrain from such cheap politics."

ANI

104,142 views • 1 year ago

Our eminent TV anchor, Manak Gupta ji, enthusiastically keeps talking about the “chicken neck speech” whenever asking any question about Sharjeel Imam. In his world view, which is shaped up by the Whatsapp University, Sharjeel has been denied bail for this speech made on 16 Jan 2020. Either Manak wants to mislead his audience or he himself has no knowledge of the case. If the latter is true, I will politely ask him to ask his TV Channel’s research team to do their job properly. That statement in the speech led to 5 separate FIRs where he has already been granted bail by the courts. And even while granting bail Allahabad Court clearly stated "It may be noted that on an undisputed basis neither the applicant called any one to bear arms nor any violence was incited as a result of the speech delivered by the applicant." There is no evidence and material against Sharjeel bhai linking him to the unfortunate riots between 22-24 Feb (more than a month after the speech), therefore the speech is being taken as a means to prejudice the public perception. Even the Honourable Supreme Court has noted in its recent order on bail application of Sharjeel Imam, “It is submitted that the appellant’s role is traceable to the first phase of the conspiracy, which involved deliberate mobilisation, radicalisation and preparation of ground conditions through organised chakka jams, blockage of arterial roads, and disruption of essential services.” Nowhere, the court has said that the roadblock was to divide India or take away Assam as Manak, and other media, wants his audience to believe. Manak in the interview of Asaduddin Owaisi has asked, “why should non-Muslims support AIMIM when Owaisi speaks against the SC order on Sharjeel Imam?” Asaduddin Owaisi sahab, a distinguished parliamentarian, disappointed me that he didn't correct Manak by pointing out that this statement had constructed all the Muslims as anti-national and Hindus as nationalists on a promise that Sharjeel was an anti-Indian person and no Hindu would vote his supporters while Muslims could en-bloc vote for him. Moreover, Owaisi sahab, a barrister by education, seems clueless that he could never say in any public interview that Sharjeel is not being tried for “Chicken Neck Speech” but the Delhi Riots conspiracy case. It is also sad that a parliamentarian of some standing, Owaisi sahab doesn't mention the name of Sharjeel Imam or Umar Khalid and keeps saying “those two people”. Instead of addressing the question of Manak he starts praising himself and blaming Chidambaram. We hope better from a man, who took a principled stand when his brother Akbaruddin was tried by the court under much less stringent acts. The truth is that Sharjeel Imam remains in custody solely due to his role in organising the peaceful Shaheen Bagh protests against CAA. Shaheen Bagh was a historic non-violent resistance, and criminalising it even after 6 years without a trial is the real injustice.

Our eminent TV anchor, Manak Gupta ji, enthusiastically keeps talking about the “chicken neck speech” whenever asking any question about Sharjeel Imam. In his world view, which is shaped up by the Whatsapp University, Sharjeel has been denied bail for this speech made on 16 Jan 2020. Either Manak wants to mislead his audience or he himself has no knowledge of the case. If the latter is true, I will politely ask him to ask his TV Channel’s research team to do their job properly. That statement in the speech led to 5 separate FIRs where he has already been granted bail by the courts. And even while granting bail Allahabad Court clearly stated "It may be noted that on an undisputed basis neither the applicant called any one to bear arms nor any violence was incited as a result of the speech delivered by the applicant." There is no evidence and material against Sharjeel bhai linking him to the unfortunate riots between 22-24 Feb (more than a month after the speech), therefore the speech is being taken as a means to prejudice the public perception. Even the Honourable Supreme Court has noted in its recent order on bail application of Sharjeel Imam, “It is submitted that the appellant’s role is traceable to the first phase of the conspiracy, which involved deliberate mobilisation, radicalisation and preparation of ground conditions through organised chakka jams, blockage of arterial roads, and disruption of essential services.” Nowhere, the court has said that the roadblock was to divide India or take away Assam as Manak, and other media, wants his audience to believe. Manak in the interview of Asaduddin Owaisi has asked, “why should non-Muslims support AIMIM when Owaisi speaks against the SC order on Sharjeel Imam?” Asaduddin Owaisi sahab, a distinguished parliamentarian, disappointed me that he didn't correct Manak by pointing out that this statement had constructed all the Muslims as anti-national and Hindus as nationalists on a promise that Sharjeel was an anti-Indian person and no Hindu would vote his supporters while Muslims could en-bloc vote for him. Moreover, Owaisi sahab, a barrister by education, seems clueless that he could never say in any public interview that Sharjeel is not being tried for “Chicken Neck Speech” but the Delhi Riots conspiracy case. It is also sad that a parliamentarian of some standing, Owaisi sahab doesn't mention the name of Sharjeel Imam or Umar Khalid and keeps saying “those two people”. Instead of addressing the question of Manak he starts praising himself and blaming Chidambaram. We hope better from a man, who took a principled stand when his brother Akbaruddin was tried by the court under much less stringent acts. The truth is that Sharjeel Imam remains in custody solely due to his role in organising the peaceful Shaheen Bagh protests against CAA. Shaheen Bagh was a historic non-violent resistance, and criminalising it even after 6 years without a trial is the real injustice.

Muzzammil Imam | مزمل إمام

19,017 views • 6 months ago

#WATCH | Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | BJP MP Anurag Thakur, member of the Group 7 all-party delegation led by NCP-SCP Supriya Sule, says, "African Union has been suffering for a long time in the Sahel region where more than 3,43,000 people and armed forces have lost their lives. It is the African Union that has a clear-cut policy and framework on terrorism. We have requested them and we have told them our viewpoint on how India has been facing cross-border terrorism for so many decades and has lost thousands of lives. The recent attack in Pahalgam was based on religion, which tried to divide the country. But 1.4 billion Indians stand united in this fight against terrorism. We collectively from the Ethiopian side and the Indian side, agreed on the lines of the global coalition against terrorism. India is facing state-sponsored terrorism where Pakistan is directly or indirectly funding the terrorists and the terrorist outfits...The solidarity which Ethiopia has shown with the people of India against terrorism shows that we have a common cause, zero tolerance against terrorism..."

#WATCH | Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | BJP MP Anurag Thakur, member of the Group 7 all-party delegation led by NCP-SCP Supriya Sule, says, "African Union has been suffering for a long time in the Sahel region where more than 3,43,000 people and armed forces have lost their lives. It is the African Union that has a clear-cut policy and framework on terrorism. We have requested them and we have told them our viewpoint on how India has been facing cross-border terrorism for so many decades and has lost thousands of lives. The recent attack in Pahalgam was based on religion, which tried to divide the country. But 1.4 billion Indians stand united in this fight against terrorism. We collectively from the Ethiopian side and the Indian side, agreed on the lines of the global coalition against terrorism. India is facing state-sponsored terrorism where Pakistan is directly or indirectly funding the terrorists and the terrorist outfits...The solidarity which Ethiopia has shown with the people of India against terrorism shows that we have a common cause, zero tolerance against terrorism..."

ANI

11,103 views • 1 year ago

We’re used to wars that get turned into movies. Maybe this war will get turned into a series. So there’s a first season with 'Rising Lion,' a second season, 'Roaring Lion,' a third season, 'Screaming Lion,' and a fourth—oh, you know what, are you setting us up for a cycle every eight or nine months? No, I think this was a very, very significant round, but it isn’t measured in terms of zero or one; rather, it’s measured on a much, much more complex axis. There was a significant reduction in nuclear capabilities. There was an even more significant reduction in ballistic capabilities, and there was a fatal blow to the regime’s overall ability to survive. Because now that they have rials, they have to decide where to invest them, and the dilemma is far from simple. Even before a new ballistic missile or a brand-new navy, they have to decide whether to invest it in the population that remains there. Look, in my view, as early as the second week—when it became clear that hopes the regime would fall during the war were probably premature or exaggerated—the preferred end scenario for Israelis and Americans was this: hit them as hard as possible, wage a war of attrition, and then finish it off while the American military is still in the area. The Iranian people understand what’s happening and, uh, are ready to do this thing. I have to say one thing: we Israelis have benefited from the war regarding the Iranian issue, but we should take a good look at what’s happening in the United States. Because in my opinion, that’s the—how shall we call it—long term, and there’s a problem there. There is a problem for two reasons: first, because the United States has not achieved, at least not yet, what it wanted to achieve; and second, because as long as it does not achieve it, the finger of blame will be pointed at the State of Israel. Therefore, we should invest a great deal of effort in the United States, in shaping public opinion there, and in particular, Republican public opinion.

Amit Segal

18,029 views • 3 months ago

Most people are still arguing about Israel. They missed the actual move. Vincent Oshana, two days ago: “In the span of two months, we choked off China’s discounted oil flow from Venezuela and now Iran.” Stop. Read it again. China runs on discounted oil. Take it away — their global influence machine slows down. Russia was getting Iranian drones for Ukraine — cheap, effective, endless. That pipeline is now cut. Iran funded terrorism, proxies, and its own regime through energy exports. The money is drying up. Three adversaries. Three pressure points. Sixty days. “Take your Israel time out for a second… take a step back and look at the board strategically.” This isn’t a Middle East story dressed up as foreign policy. It’s an energy war. A weapons war. A cash war. Running at the same time. Cut Venezuela → China’s leverage weakens. Cut Iran → Russia’s drone supply collapses AND Iran’s funding evaporates. One move. Two wounds. Simultaneously. “A lot of people are so stuck on just one thing, they can’t get out of this freaking cloud.” The cloud is the point. Keep the public focused on one square while three players get strangled on the rest of the board. “You can talk the talk… but Donald Trump is walking the walk.” Call it what you want. But coordinated pressure on oil, weapons, and cash — hitting China, Russia, and Iran inside the same 60-day window — is not an accident. That’s a strategy. Does it work long-term, or does squeezing three fronts at once leave you exposed everywhere? Zoom out before you answer. 🌍

Most people are still arguing about Israel. They missed the actual move. Vincent Oshana, two days ago: “In the span of two months, we choked off China’s discounted oil flow from Venezuela and now Iran.” Stop. Read it again. China runs on discounted oil. Take it away — their global influence machine slows down. Russia was getting Iranian drones for Ukraine — cheap, effective, endless. That pipeline is now cut. Iran funded terrorism, proxies, and its own regime through energy exports. The money is drying up. Three adversaries. Three pressure points. Sixty days. “Take your Israel time out for a second… take a step back and look at the board strategically.” This isn’t a Middle East story dressed up as foreign policy. It’s an energy war. A weapons war. A cash war. Running at the same time. Cut Venezuela → China’s leverage weakens. Cut Iran → Russia’s drone supply collapses AND Iran’s funding evaporates. One move. Two wounds. Simultaneously. “A lot of people are so stuck on just one thing, they can’t get out of this freaking cloud.” The cloud is the point. Keep the public focused on one square while three players get strangled on the rest of the board. “You can talk the talk… but Donald Trump is walking the walk.” Call it what you want. But coordinated pressure on oil, weapons, and cash — hitting China, Russia, and Iran inside the same 60-day window — is not an accident. That’s a strategy. Does it work long-term, or does squeezing three fronts at once leave you exposed everywhere? Zoom out before you answer. 🌍

Jake

120,986 views • 5 months ago

$ETH My view on #ETH My plan: 1. Liquidity sweep at 1804 2. First long zone: 1720/1800 (safe long) 3. Second long zone: 1744/1680 (unlikely we’ll get there) 4. Conservative target: 2000 5. If $BTC reaches 70K/72K, then $ETH target is 2100/2200 $ETH looks stronger than $BTC, so in my opinion the probability of reaching the second zone is minimal. Of course, there is still a chance we won’t even reach the first long zone, but I can’t give a super risky long. As expected, FED did not cut rates yesterday. Over the next 30–90 days, I expect the final correction to begin. So be careful. If anything changes, I’ll let you know! DYOR As a reminder, I warned about the bull trap at $82K and the summer drop. MY NEXT CALL WILL BE THE BIGGEST ONE OF THIS CYCLE. TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS. MOST PEOPLE WILL FOLLOW ME TOO LATE.

$ETH My view on #ETH My plan: 1. Liquidity sweep at 1804 2. First long zone: 1720/1800 (safe long) 3. Second long zone: 1744/1680 (unlikely we’ll get there) 4. Conservative target: 2000 5. If $BTC reaches 70K/72K, then $ETH target is 2100/2200 $ETH looks stronger than $BTC, so in my opinion the probability of reaching the second zone is minimal. Of course, there is still a chance we won’t even reach the first long zone, but I can’t give a super risky long. As expected, FED did not cut rates yesterday. Over the next 30–90 days, I expect the final correction to begin. So be careful. If anything changes, I’ll let you know! DYOR As a reminder, I warned about the bull trap at $82K and the summer drop. MY NEXT CALL WILL BE THE BIGGEST ONE OF THIS CYCLE. TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS. MOST PEOPLE WILL FOLLOW ME TOO LATE.

Tony Research

65,528 views • 3 days ago

If you WATCH just one video today, make it this one.🔥🔥🔥 A Navy veteran and DOD civilian employee shares his perspective on the mandatory return to in-person work for federal employees and his thoughts on Trump’s policies. “I want people to understand that we, as a country—We, the United States—have been trending on the wrong side of finances for a very long time. We, as a country, are $37 trillion in debt right now. Do I agree with everything that Trump is doing? Do I agree with how he’s going about it? No. But I understand why. We have to stop being emotional and look at the black and white of everything. We were not going to survive much longer financially as a country—that’s just what it is. Take your glasses off, or take whatever you have on, and stop putting all your vitriol on Trump. Instead, put it on the United States government. Because right now, we have a president in office—whether you like him or not—who is trying to do what’s best for the country. He sees the writing on the wall. This country is about making money, and we were not making money—we were losing money and losing power. They’re trying to resuscitate the United States as the global power that it is. The decisions that are being made now are trying to right the ship so that we are in a better position in the next 10 or 15 years.”

If you WATCH just one video today, make it this one.🔥🔥🔥 A Navy veteran and DOD civilian employee shares his perspective on the mandatory return to in-person work for federal employees and his thoughts on Trump’s policies. “I want people to understand that we, as a country—We, the United States—have been trending on the wrong side of finances for a very long time. We, as a country, are $37 trillion in debt right now. Do I agree with everything that Trump is doing? Do I agree with how he’s going about it? No. But I understand why. We have to stop being emotional and look at the black and white of everything. We were not going to survive much longer financially as a country—that’s just what it is. Take your glasses off, or take whatever you have on, and stop putting all your vitriol on Trump. Instead, put it on the United States government. Because right now, we have a president in office—whether you like him or not—who is trying to do what’s best for the country. He sees the writing on the wall. This country is about making money, and we were not making money—we were losing money and losing power. They’re trying to resuscitate the United States as the global power that it is. The decisions that are being made now are trying to right the ship so that we are in a better position in the next 10 or 15 years.”

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

168,654 views • 1 year ago

Sept 2025. Marco Rubio combats a hostile George Stephanopoulos, who angrily tries to get Rubio to agree that USAID cuts are causing deaths. Rubio’s methodical response: "We shut down AID because it was a dysfunctional organization. We moved it under the State Department. Number two, we are going to do more foreign aid than any country in the world." "We are not going to fund an NGO industrial complex that built itself up, that was taking a substantial percentage of the money…" "So we are restructuring the way we do aid. It's going to be far more effective and integrated into our holistic foreign policy." "Let's blame the other countries that don't do any foreign aid." “Anybody who tells you that somehow it's the United States, if we cut a dollar, somehow we're responsible for some horrific thing that's going on in the world. It's just not true." “One of the reasons why some of these places didn't get the aid is not because we cut the aid. It's because there's a war going on and the aid never got to the people." "It gets hijacked and stolen by criminal gangs that control the country. And so they're the ones to blame for whatever happening there, not us who provided more aid than anybody else." "No one has died because the United States has cut aid." “The United States has saved more lives and continues to save more lives than any other country in the world." **Stephanopoulos grimaces, fumes and pouts**

Sept 2025. Marco Rubio combats a hostile George Stephanopoulos, who angrily tries to get Rubio to agree that USAID cuts are causing deaths. Rubio’s methodical response: "We shut down AID because it was a dysfunctional organization. We moved it under the State Department. Number two, we are going to do more foreign aid than any country in the world." "We are not going to fund an NGO industrial complex that built itself up, that was taking a substantial percentage of the money…" "So we are restructuring the way we do aid. It's going to be far more effective and integrated into our holistic foreign policy." "Let's blame the other countries that don't do any foreign aid." “Anybody who tells you that somehow it's the United States, if we cut a dollar, somehow we're responsible for some horrific thing that's going on in the world. It's just not true." “One of the reasons why some of these places didn't get the aid is not because we cut the aid. It's because there's a war going on and the aid never got to the people." "It gets hijacked and stolen by criminal gangs that control the country. And so they're the ones to blame for whatever happening there, not us who provided more aid than anybody else." "No one has died because the United States has cut aid." “The United States has saved more lives and continues to save more lives than any other country in the world." Stephanopoulos grimaces, fumes and pouts

Western Lensman

413,974 views • 1 month ago

The U.S. is considering a deal that would let Nvidia and AMD sell certain AI chips to China, with a 15% cut of that business going straight to the government. Two big questions: Should we ship chips to China or other adversaries? And is this 15% fee a tax, a tariff, or just pay to play? My answer to the first is yes, as long as they are building on the American tech stack. Even if we ship older generations, they remain dependent on U.S. firmware and software. That keeps us in control and prevents competitors like Huawei from catching up. On the 15% cut, call it a tax, tariff, or shakedown. It's still incremental cash flow for shareholders, and the market likes it. Here's the real issue for me... We added 3 trillion dollars in debt. I don't want free checks going out to everyone. I want America to stay the number one place for the world to invest. That means using this revenue to reduce the deficit, maintaining fiscal discipline, and keeping our technological edge. Lose that confidence, and everything changes.

The U.S. is considering a deal that would let Nvidia and AMD sell certain AI chips to China, with a 15% cut of that business going straight to the government. Two big questions: Should we ship chips to China or other adversaries? And is this 15% fee a tax, a tariff, or just pay to play? My answer to the first is yes, as long as they are building on the American tech stack. Even if we ship older generations, they remain dependent on U.S. firmware and software. That keeps us in control and prevents competitors like Huawei from catching up. On the 15% cut, call it a tax, tariff, or shakedown. It's still incremental cash flow for shareholders, and the market likes it. Here's the real issue for me... We added 3 trillion dollars in debt. I don't want free checks going out to everyone. I want America to stay the number one place for the world to invest. That means using this revenue to reduce the deficit, maintaining fiscal discipline, and keeping our technological edge. Lose that confidence, and everything changes.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

23,362 views • 11 months ago

Yesterday I was opportune to be part of a Town Hall event organised by Channels Television anchored by SeunOkin Channels tv to discuss the Tax Reform Bills currently before the national assembly. The bills have seen significant opposition coming from some northern leaders and the NGF, especially on the issue of VAT revenue sharing among the states with many calling for the bills to be withdrawn by the President on account of this singular issue. Personally, I feel that part of the opposition from the bills stems from ignorance of the actual provisions contained in them or misconception of some aspects of the bill. However, when we look at the amount of VAT revenue that is triggering this whole haggling, you'll realise how precarious our revenue situation is. A dispassionate look at the data is essential to guide our positions on the necessity of these tax reforms. By the end of 2024, we may hit a record VAT collection of N6 trillion but that's just around $3.5 billion. In many states, their share of VAT revenue from FAAC in a year is bigger than their entire IGR! How on earth do you develop with such a revenue profile? This shows clearly that we need to reorganise and re-engineer our finances for optimum performance. This is what these bills seek to do. Although, increasing revenue collection is actually one of the intentions of these reforms but it is not the MAJOR reason. The major aim is to remove all the cogs and bottlenecks that affect growth and profitability of businesses in Nigeria by reducing their tax burden and exempting the small businesses from paying income tax. The vast majority of Nigerians who are poor would also be exempt from paying income tax. We're talking about 90% of Nigerians here! In other climes, any piece of legislation that brings overall tax relief to low income earners is always a popular bill with massive support. It is therefore bizarre that some persons are up in arms in Nigeria to oppose this kind of landmark legislation and they claim they're fighting for the masses. Data and logic should guide our positions and not sentiments or mischievous ignorance. Any reservations held by any individual or group about any section of the bills should be presented to the NASS during the public hearings and not calling for the withdrawal of the bills. Let's be serious in this country please.

Michael Chibuzo®

16,022 views • 1 year ago

Secretary of State Marco Rubio exploded as ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos pressed him on his denial that people had died as a result of U.S. aid cuts. During the Tuedsay morning interview on Good Morning America Rubio painted the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), shuttered by Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative this year, as having been bloated and corrupt. We shut down U.S. aid because it was a dysfunctional organization,” Rubio began. “We moved it under the State Department,” he said. “We are going to do more foreign aid than any country in the world… but we’re going to do it the right way.” “That’s all in the future, but are you standing by that comment you’re saying that no one died because of the aid cuts are all those aid organizations?” Stephanopoulos asked. “That’s ridiculous,” Rubio snapped back. Rubio continued: “Well first of all, well then they died because England didn’t give enough money or Canada didn’t give more or China did. Let’s blame the other countries that don’t do any foreign aid. How about China? I mean China’s the second largest economy in the world. They don’t give money to these projects.” “I think anybody who tells you that somehow it’s the United States, if we cut a dollar, somehow we’re responsible for some horrific thing that’s going on in the world, it’s just not true,” Rubio replied. The secretary of state pivoted to blame corruption and “gangs” in the countries receiving aid. Rubio continued: “One of the reasons why some of the places didn’t get the aid is not because we cut the aid. It’s because there’s a war going on and the aid never got to the people. So in Sudan, for example, it’s not just a humanitarian catastrophe, it is a war zone. Okay, the aid is stolen, the aid is impeded, in fact they use aid as a tool against the people, and so blocking aid is a tool and an arm of war. So in some of these places, the reason why the aid isn’t getting there is it can’t be distributed.” He added: “Look at Haiti, one of the reasons why aid can’t be distributed in Haiti, is you can send all the aid in the world you want, it gets hijacked and stolen by criminal gangs that control the country. And so they’re the ones to blame for whatever is happening there, not us who provided more aid than anybody else.” Returning to his original question: “Stephanopoulos again replied, “Well let me just say one more time, are you standing by your contention that no one has died?” “No one has died because the United States has cut aid,” Rubio clapped back. “No, people have died because gangs steal the aid. People have died because the distributors of aid have not done well. People have died because other countries haven’t stepped up, but the United States has saved more lives and continues to save more lives than any other country in the world.” He concluded: “And we’re gonna continue to do it, but we’re going to do the right way and in a responsible way. We’re not going to continue to pour billions of dollars out the door of American taxpayer funds for programs that don’t work and in some cases were flat out corrupt.” Who loves Marco Rubio as Secretary of State? I do! 👍🏻

Secretary of State Marco Rubio exploded as ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos pressed him on his denial that people had died as a result of U.S. aid cuts. During the Tuedsay morning interview on Good Morning America Rubio painted the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), shuttered by Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative this year, as having been bloated and corrupt. We shut down U.S. aid because it was a dysfunctional organization,” Rubio began. “We moved it under the State Department,” he said. “We are going to do more foreign aid than any country in the world… but we’re going to do it the right way.” “That’s all in the future, but are you standing by that comment you’re saying that no one died because of the aid cuts are all those aid organizations?” Stephanopoulos asked. “That’s ridiculous,” Rubio snapped back. Rubio continued: “Well first of all, well then they died because England didn’t give enough money or Canada didn’t give more or China did. Let’s blame the other countries that don’t do any foreign aid. How about China? I mean China’s the second largest economy in the world. They don’t give money to these projects.” “I think anybody who tells you that somehow it’s the United States, if we cut a dollar, somehow we’re responsible for some horrific thing that’s going on in the world, it’s just not true,” Rubio replied. The secretary of state pivoted to blame corruption and “gangs” in the countries receiving aid. Rubio continued: “One of the reasons why some of the places didn’t get the aid is not because we cut the aid. It’s because there’s a war going on and the aid never got to the people. So in Sudan, for example, it’s not just a humanitarian catastrophe, it is a war zone. Okay, the aid is stolen, the aid is impeded, in fact they use aid as a tool against the people, and so blocking aid is a tool and an arm of war. So in some of these places, the reason why the aid isn’t getting there is it can’t be distributed.” He added: “Look at Haiti, one of the reasons why aid can’t be distributed in Haiti, is you can send all the aid in the world you want, it gets hijacked and stolen by criminal gangs that control the country. And so they’re the ones to blame for whatever is happening there, not us who provided more aid than anybody else.” Returning to his original question: “Stephanopoulos again replied, “Well let me just say one more time, are you standing by your contention that no one has died?” “No one has died because the United States has cut aid,” Rubio clapped back. “No, people have died because gangs steal the aid. People have died because the distributors of aid have not done well. People have died because other countries haven’t stepped up, but the United States has saved more lives and continues to save more lives than any other country in the world.” He concluded: “And we’re gonna continue to do it, but we’re going to do the right way and in a responsible way. We’re not going to continue to pour billions of dollars out the door of American taxpayer funds for programs that don’t work and in some cases were flat out corrupt.” Who loves Marco Rubio as Secretary of State? I do! 👍🏻

Victoria 🇺🇸⏳🗽🚔

73,432 views • 8 months ago

There is a prediction circulating in AI circles right now that most people are not taking seriously enough and the data says they should be. Within the next year or two, if you work remotely, your company will be able to create a digital twin of you. A model that speaks like you, writes like you, has learned from everything you have done right and wrong, your tone, your judgment calls, your workflow. It will be you on the other side of Zoom or Slack and no one could tell the difference. The harder question, the one nobody wants to sit with is whether it will actually be worse at your job than you are. Probably not. It will never sleep and it will always learn from its mistakes and it will cost 10 to 100 times less than you do and is tax deductible on top of that. The data is not speculative at this point. Anthropic's own labor market report pulled from millions of real Claude conversations found that AI can already theoretically automate 94% of tasks in computer and math occupations, 60-80% across law, office work, and tech. Actual usage is still at 10-20% of that potential which means we are in the early innings of the gap closing. Companies already know what direction this is headed. One in five companies replaced specific roles with AI in 2025 and by end of 2026, 30-37% plan to do so. Amazon cut 14,000 corporate jobs citing AI, Klarna replaced 700 customer service workers, Duolingo offboarded 10% of its contractor workforce. Anthropic's own first internal role eliminated was the engineer who reviewed Claude Code releases before they went to production. The argument from the clip is that the human in the loop is approaching the point of being a liability, the dumbest person on a team that is otherwise AI. That inflection point, by this estimate, is somewhere in the next 900 days.

There is a prediction circulating in AI circles right now that most people are not taking seriously enough and the data says they should be. Within the next year or two, if you work remotely, your company will be able to create a digital twin of you. A model that speaks like you, writes like you, has learned from everything you have done right and wrong, your tone, your judgment calls, your workflow. It will be you on the other side of Zoom or Slack and no one could tell the difference. The harder question, the one nobody wants to sit with is whether it will actually be worse at your job than you are. Probably not. It will never sleep and it will always learn from its mistakes and it will cost 10 to 100 times less than you do and is tax deductible on top of that. The data is not speculative at this point. Anthropic's own labor market report pulled from millions of real Claude conversations found that AI can already theoretically automate 94% of tasks in computer and math occupations, 60-80% across law, office work, and tech. Actual usage is still at 10-20% of that potential which means we are in the early innings of the gap closing. Companies already know what direction this is headed. One in five companies replaced specific roles with AI in 2025 and by end of 2026, 30-37% plan to do so. Amazon cut 14,000 corporate jobs citing AI, Klarna replaced 700 customer service workers, Duolingo offboarded 10% of its contractor workforce. Anthropic's own first internal role eliminated was the engineer who reviewed Claude Code releases before they went to production. The argument from the clip is that the human in the loop is approaching the point of being a liability, the dumbest person on a team that is otherwise AI. That inflection point, by this estimate, is somewhere in the next 900 days.

Milk Road AI

17,209 views • 3 months ago

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

neandrewthal

74,654 views • 1 year ago

Rescue operations are still underway in Kharkiv following a Russian airstrike on a residential building. It’s just an ordinary 12-story building. There was a fire, and the floors collapsed. There are people trapped under the rubble. As of now, 35 people have been injured, including three children. In this single strike on Kharkiv, four air bombs were dropped. One hit the building in the city, and the other three struck villages in the region. Today, similar bombings were also carried out by the Russians in the Sumy and Donetsk regions. Overall, there are no fewer than 100 such airstrikes every day. In the past 24 hours alone, there were 128 guided air bombs. The only way to counter this terror is through a systemic solution—long-range capabilities to destroy Russian military aviation at its bases. This is an obvious, logical solution. We have already explained to all our partners why Ukraine truly needs sufficient long-range capabilities. Every Russian strike, every act of terror—like today’s attack on the city of Kharkiv, and the Sumy and Donetsk regions — proves that we need this capability, and we need it in full. We are waiting for the relevant decisions, especially from the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy—everyone whose decisiveness can help save lives.

Rescue operations are still underway in Kharkiv following a Russian airstrike on a residential building. It’s just an ordinary 12-story building. There was a fire, and the floors collapsed. There are people trapped under the rubble. As of now, 35 people have been injured, including three children. In this single strike on Kharkiv, four air bombs were dropped. One hit the building in the city, and the other three struck villages in the region. Today, similar bombings were also carried out by the Russians in the Sumy and Donetsk regions. Overall, there are no fewer than 100 such airstrikes every day. In the past 24 hours alone, there were 128 guided air bombs. The only way to counter this terror is through a systemic solution—long-range capabilities to destroy Russian military aviation at its bases. This is an obvious, logical solution. We have already explained to all our partners why Ukraine truly needs sufficient long-range capabilities. Every Russian strike, every act of terror—like today’s attack on the city of Kharkiv, and the Sumy and Donetsk regions — proves that we need this capability, and we need it in full. We are waiting for the relevant decisions, especially from the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy—everyone whose decisiveness can help save lives.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

418,859 views • 1 year ago

NEW: Dr. Oz says there’s still $14 BILLION being STOLEN through Medicaid fraud—and Trump’s latest crackdown is coming for all of it. “I’m infuriated, I’m sure all of the viewers are as well, that someone can be a millionaire on Medicaid.” “Unfortunately it happens more often than you think.” That’s why, Oz says, Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill is designed to CRUSH the criminals gaming the system. “To do it correctly you have to know who people are, where they are and you have to give them control over their own data.” “We believe there’s about $14 BILLION stolen by people who are duly registered in Medicaid in multiple states, or on Medicaid on any of the exchanges.” “There are women like the one you mentioned, getting away with criminal activity, stealing money from our most vulnerable.” And Trump is laying down the law: “Yesterday he brought together 60 of the top companies in health and technology and said guys we have to do this. We made the laws, we made the rules, you’ve been violating them. We want you to voluntarily come in and pledge to do the right thing.” The message is clear: Enough is enough.

NEW: Dr. Oz says there’s still $14 BILLION being STOLEN through Medicaid fraud—and Trump’s latest crackdown is coming for all of it. “I’m infuriated, I’m sure all of the viewers are as well, that someone can be a millionaire on Medicaid.” “Unfortunately it happens more often than you think.” That’s why, Oz says, Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill is designed to CRUSH the criminals gaming the system. “To do it correctly you have to know who people are, where they are and you have to give them control over their own data.” “We believe there’s about $14 BILLION stolen by people who are duly registered in Medicaid in multiple states, or on Medicaid on any of the exchanges.” “There are women like the one you mentioned, getting away with criminal activity, stealing money from our most vulnerable.” And Trump is laying down the law: “Yesterday he brought together 60 of the top companies in health and technology and said guys we have to do this. We made the laws, we made the rules, you’ve been violating them. We want you to voluntarily come in and pledge to do the right thing.” The message is clear: Enough is enough.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

184,029 views • 1 year ago

$Wolfers: For nine out of the last 10 presidencies, if you’d said, “How much should we blame the president for what’s going on with the economy right now?” I would have said that the president is just one factor among many. That’s what I would have said nine out of 10 times. This is the 10th time. There’s literally no question about the cause of the current oil price spike. It is that we decided to go to war in Iran on an open-ended, ill-defined mission, and we’re not quite sure what to do. The Iranians took over the Strait of Hormuz, and now the global economy is substantially fractured and global energy markets are in disarray. There’s no question about what caused that. We know that because we actually saw things get a little bit better in June during the ceasefire, but those happy days are behind us. There’s also no question that tariffs are a complete own goal. They’ve led to higher prices paid by Americans. And that, I think, explains why, if you look at the United States compared to our peers in the G7—think of these as other economies that are kind of like, if the U.S. economy had mates, this is who they’d be—comparable large industrialized economies, the United States right now has higher inflation than any of them. We’re number one, but it’s not one of those good number ones. And let me just add: it really does hurt my heart because we know how not to screw things up. Any economics textbook, anyone who’s taken introductory economics, would know that there are large economic costs to going to war. They would know that starting a global trade war in a chaotic and incoherent fashion is all downside and no upside.$

Wolfers: For nine out of the last 10 presidencies, if you’d said, “How much should we blame the president for what’s going on with the economy right now?” I would have said that the president is just one factor among many. That’s what I would have said nine out of 10 times. This is the 10th time. There’s literally no question about the cause of the current oil price spike. It is that we decided to go to war in Iran on an open-ended, ill-defined mission, and we’re not quite sure what to do. The Iranians took over the Strait of Hormuz, and now the global economy is substantially fractured and global energy markets are in disarray. There’s no question about what caused that. We know that because we actually saw things get a little bit better in June during the ceasefire, but those happy days are behind us. There’s also no question that tariffs are a complete own goal. They’ve led to higher prices paid by Americans. And that, I think, explains why, if you look at the United States compared to our peers in the G7—think of these as other economies that are kind of like, if the U.S. economy had mates, this is who they’d be—comparable large industrialized economies, the United States right now has higher inflation than any of them. We’re number one, but it’s not one of those good number ones. And let me just add: it really does hurt my heart because we know how not to screw things up. Any economics textbook, anyone who’s taken introductory economics, would know that there are large economic costs to going to war. They would know that starting a global trade war in a chaotic and incoherent fashion is all downside and no upside.

Acyn

231,285 views • 8 days ago