Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

‼️‼️🇷🇺🚀☢️🇺🇦 Concerns over possible nuclear escalation are reportedly growing within Russia’s own leadership, with an increasing number of senior officials believing that Vladimir Putin could resort to tactical nuclear weapons. According to Bloomberg, citing its sources, Russia’s key partners, including China and India, have issued strong warnings to Putin,...

visionergeo's profile picture

Visioner

226,669 subscribers

191,491 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyEducationNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.
0:23

🇷🇺☢️🇺🇦 Concern inside Russia’s own establishment over the possibility that Vladimir Putin could resort to a tactical nuclear weapon is reportedly growing, as the Kremlin searches for ways to change the trajectory of the war. According to Bloomberg, an increasing number of Russian officials and people familiar with discussions inside the Kremlin believe the possibility of Putin considering tactical nuclear use can no longer be completely dismissed. The concern reflects the enormous military and political stakes Moscow now faces in Ukraine and the growing uncertainty surrounding how far the Kremlin could escalate if conventional options fail to deliver its objectives. Russia’s key international partners are also deeply opposed to such a scenario. China and India have warned Moscow against nuclear escalation, with Beijing repeatedly communicating that Russia should not even consider employing nuclear weapons against Ukraine. China has continued publicly emphasizing its opposition to nuclear use and escalation. The political consequences for Moscow would be enormous. Crossing the nuclear threshold would risk destroying much of the diplomatic space Russia still retains with countries such as China and India, while radically escalating its confrontation with Ukraine and the West. That helps explain why pressure from Beijing and New Delhi matters: for Putin, nuclear escalation would not simply represent another military step, but potentially a fundamental rupture with partners Russia increasingly depends upon.

NSTRIKE

56,879 views • 5 days ago

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸🇬🇧 Putin’s nuclear threat is becoming a bigger concern A growing number of Russian officials reportedly believe Vladimir Putin could eventually consider tactical nuclear weapons as a last resort in Ukraine, according to reports, citing Kremlin insiders. This does not indicate that a nuclear strike is imminent. However, Western officials remain concerned that the war could reach a point where Russia considers crossing the nuclear threshold that has held since 1945. If that taboo were broken, the consequences could extend far beyond Ukraine, potentially reshaping European security and the global nuclear order. 👀 For now, the key question is whether deterrence can prevent the conflict from reaching that point.
0:32

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸🇬🇧 Putin’s nuclear threat is becoming a bigger concern A growing number of Russian officials reportedly believe Vladimir Putin could eventually consider tactical nuclear weapons as a last resort in Ukraine, according to reports, citing Kremlin insiders. This does not indicate that a nuclear strike is imminent. However, Western officials remain concerned that the war could reach a point where Russia considers crossing the nuclear threshold that has held since 1945. If that taboo were broken, the consequences could extend far beyond Ukraine, potentially reshaping European security and the global nuclear order. 👀 For now, the key question is whether deterrence can prevent the conflict from reaching that point.

War Radar

62,550 views • 4 days ago

⚡️BREAKING: President Putin introduced the amendments of Russia’s nuclear doctrine under which: ☢️Aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, will be perceived as their joint attack on the Russian Federation. ☢️Russia will consider the possibility of usage nuclear weapon after receiving reliable information about the massive launch of means of aerospace attack, including strategic or tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, hypersonic and other aircraft. ☢️Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Belarus, as a part of the Union state.
1:09

⚡️BREAKING: President Putin introduced the amendments of Russia’s nuclear doctrine under which: ☢️Aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state, will be perceived as their joint attack on the Russian Federation. ☢️Russia will consider the possibility of usage nuclear weapon after receiving reliable information about the massive launch of means of aerospace attack, including strategic or tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, hypersonic and other aircraft. ☢️Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Belarus, as a part of the Union state.

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

121,108 views • 1 year ago

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered Russia’s powerful Satan II nuclear missiles to be battle-ready immediately, signaling a sign of escalation. This move comes amid warnings from Russia that its patience with Ukraine and NATO is running out. Capable of striking targets across the U.S. and Europe, the Satan II missiles are a key component of Russia's nuclear arsenal.
1:44

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered Russia’s powerful Satan II nuclear missiles to be battle-ready immediately, signaling a sign of escalation. This move comes amid warnings from Russia that its patience with Ukraine and NATO is running out. Capable of striking targets across the U.S. and Europe, the Satan II missiles are a key component of Russia's nuclear arsenal.

Shadow of Ezra

350,032 views • 1 year ago

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇺🇦 Russian nationalists are urging President Vladimir Putin to use tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine following Kyiv's deep drone strikes inside Russia. The calls have sparked fresh fears of escalation, with hardliners also demanding intensified attacks on Kyiv and an end to talks with Washington. Ukraine continues to resist Russia's full scale invasion, while the Kremlin has not acted on these demands. Source: Reuters
0:28

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇺🇦 Russian nationalists are urging President Vladimir Putin to use tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine following Kyiv's deep drone strikes inside Russia. The calls have sparked fresh fears of escalation, with hardliners also demanding intensified attacks on Kyiv and an end to talks with Washington. Ukraine continues to resist Russia's full scale invasion, while the Kremlin has not acted on these demands. Source: Reuters

War Radar

33,505 views • 2 months ago

🇬🇧🇷🇺🇺🇦‼️🚨 STARMER IS READY TO SACRAFICE UK TO NOT LET RUSSIA WIN Journalist: “Russia’s also threatened Nuclear escalation, are you comfortable with that, with people watching at home, knowing you could be putting us at risk? Nuclear war?” Starmer: “Russia is the aggressor.” Journalist: “Even if it unleashes Nuclear War?” Starmer: “Russia has to be the one that makes the move to stop this war”
0:55

🇬🇧🇷🇺🇺🇦‼️🚨 STARMER IS READY TO SACRAFICE UK TO NOT LET RUSSIA WIN Journalist: “Russia’s also threatened Nuclear escalation, are you comfortable with that, with people watching at home, knowing you could be putting us at risk? Nuclear war?” Starmer: “Russia is the aggressor.” Journalist: “Even if it unleashes Nuclear War?” Starmer: “Russia has to be the one that makes the move to stop this war”

Lord Bebo

365,899 views • 1 year ago

🇷🇺🇺🇸 TRUMP: PUTIN AND I DISCUSSED NUCLEAR DE-ESCALATION AND I’M FINE WITH THAT “President Putin in his call mentioned to me about nuclear, where we do a de-escalation, and I’m fine with that. I think it’s good. I think it’s a very appropriate thing. We have the most nuclear weapons. Russia’s second. China is actually third by a long way, but they’ll be even within four or five years.” Source: Aaron Rupar
0:40

🇷🇺🇺🇸 TRUMP: PUTIN AND I DISCUSSED NUCLEAR DE-ESCALATION AND I’M FINE WITH THAT “President Putin in his call mentioned to me about nuclear, where we do a de-escalation, and I’m fine with that. I think it’s good. I think it’s a very appropriate thing. We have the most nuclear weapons. Russia’s second. China is actually third by a long way, but they’ll be even within four or five years.” Source: Aaron Rupar

Mario Nawfal

240,562 views • 10 months ago

☢️🇷🇺🇺🇦Will Russia use TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS if peace talks to end the Ukraine proxy war fail? ‘The rung of the escalation ladder that would provide for the use of tactical nuclear weapons is still preceded by several more rungs that Russia has yet to climb. We are now at a very pivotal moment when we can either move toward a settlement that would deserve the word peace, or at least prevent a resumption of the war… Or we can see the war becoming more intense with all sorts of new weaponry being used and the battlefield becoming more expanded.’ -Dr. Dmitri Trenin, Member of Russia’s Foreign and Defence Policy Council, on Washington-Moscow peace talks to end the proxy war FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
1:29

☢️🇷🇺🇺🇦Will Russia use TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS if peace talks to end the Ukraine proxy war fail? ‘The rung of the escalation ladder that would provide for the use of tactical nuclear weapons is still preceded by several more rungs that Russia has yet to climb. We are now at a very pivotal moment when we can either move toward a settlement that would deserve the word peace, or at least prevent a resumption of the war… Or we can see the war becoming more intense with all sorts of new weaponry being used and the battlefield becoming more expanded.’ -Dr. Dmitri Trenin, Member of Russia’s Foreign and Defence Policy Council, on Washington-Moscow peace talks to end the proxy war FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

254,277 views • 9 months ago

There have been recent reports and warnings from Russian officials and allies of President Putin indicating that Russia is prepared to use nuclear weapons against the UK and Germany if the conflict in Ukraine continues. A top Putin advisor has reportedly stated that Russia may eliminate these countries with nuclear strikes as part of its strategic threats. These statements reflect heightened tensions and nuclear rhetoric amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.
14:12

There have been recent reports and warnings from Russian officials and allies of President Putin indicating that Russia is prepared to use nuclear weapons against the UK and Germany if the conflict in Ukraine continues. A top Putin advisor has reportedly stated that Russia may eliminate these countries with nuclear strikes as part of its strategic threats. These statements reflect heightened tensions and nuclear rhetoric amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

119,533 views • 5 months ago

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE NUCLEAR DESPERATION POINT Daniel Davis warns of a rising danger that a "detached from reality" leadership could resort to tactical nuclear weapons. As oil prices climb and military solutions fail, desperation may override the system's existing guardrails. With no sign of Iran submitting, the risk of a "taboo-breaking" escalation will only increase through the end of April. Daniel Davis Deep Dive
2:28

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE NUCLEAR DESPERATION POINT Daniel Davis warns of a rising danger that a "detached from reality" leadership could resort to tactical nuclear weapons. As oil prices climb and military solutions fail, desperation may override the system's existing guardrails. With no sign of Iran submitting, the risk of a "taboo-breaking" escalation will only increase through the end of April. Daniel Davis Deep Dive

Mario Nawfal

52,276 views • 5 months ago

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.
0:29

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.

Kyle Becker

385,090 views • 1 year ago

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺 Russia’s Poseidon “Doomsday” Submarine Khabarovsk Begins Sea Trials, U.S. & Europe Face New Nuclear Challenge Russia’s Khabarovsk nuclear submarine has reportedly entered sea trials after leaving Severodvinsk, a major milestone for Moscow’s Poseidon underwater nuclear weapons program. Unlike ballistic missiles, Poseidon is designed to travel deep underwater over very long distances, creating a completely different detection and interception challenge. Khabarovsk is the first submarine designed from the outset to carry Poseidon, reportedly capable of carrying several of the nuclear powered underwater drones. 🇺🇸🇪🇺 For the U.S. and Europe, the strategic concern is clear: finding and tracking the carrier submarine before launch could be just as important as dealing with Poseidon itself. Russia’s underwater nuclear deterrent is moving from the shipyard toward the open sea. 👀
0:39

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺 Russia’s Poseidon “Doomsday” Submarine Khabarovsk Begins Sea Trials, U.S. & Europe Face New Nuclear Challenge Russia’s Khabarovsk nuclear submarine has reportedly entered sea trials after leaving Severodvinsk, a major milestone for Moscow’s Poseidon underwater nuclear weapons program. Unlike ballistic missiles, Poseidon is designed to travel deep underwater over very long distances, creating a completely different detection and interception challenge. Khabarovsk is the first submarine designed from the outset to carry Poseidon, reportedly capable of carrying several of the nuclear powered underwater drones. 🇺🇸🇪🇺 For the U.S. and Europe, the strategic concern is clear: finding and tracking the carrier submarine before launch could be just as important as dealing with Poseidon itself. Russia’s underwater nuclear deterrent is moving from the shipyard toward the open sea. 👀

War Radar

21,531 views • 12 days ago

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.
0:43

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.

Global Strategy

32,658 views • 7 months ago

🚨 NUCLEAR ALERT — Russian state TV: “To stop Europe we will need to use nuclear weapons” Russian state television talk shows said a conventional war with Europe is not feasible and that nuclear weapons would be required. On Channel One’s “Vremya Pokazhet,” National Energy Security Fund director Konstantin Simonov reportedly said Europe outmatches Russia demographically, technologically and economically, adding: “We cannot wage a conventional war with it. To stop Europe we will need to use nuclear weapons.” Similar nuclear rhetoric circulated on Russia-1 alongside a United Kingdom map graphic. The timing comes amid CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s visit to Moscow and reports, citing sources close to the Kremlin, of renewed discussion of tactical nuclear options. Particularly notable: the same propaganda line on 24 February 2022 claimed Kyiv would fall in three days as the “SVO” began.
1:30

🚨 NUCLEAR ALERT — Russian state TV: “To stop Europe we will need to use nuclear weapons” Russian state television talk shows said a conventional war with Europe is not feasible and that nuclear weapons would be required. On Channel One’s “Vremya Pokazhet,” National Energy Security Fund director Konstantin Simonov reportedly said Europe outmatches Russia demographically, technologically and economically, adding: “We cannot wage a conventional war with it. To stop Europe we will need to use nuclear weapons.” Similar nuclear rhetoric circulated on Russia-1 alongside a United Kingdom map graphic. The timing comes amid CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s visit to Moscow and reports, citing sources close to the Kremlin, of renewed discussion of tactical nuclear options. Particularly notable: the same propaganda line on 24 February 2022 claimed Kyiv would fall in three days as the “SVO” began.

Intelligence FRONT

24,436 views • 2 days ago

French President Emmanuel Macron has the solution for putin’s daily nuclear sabre-rattling. With putin acting like a delusional, playground bully throwing daily nuclear tantrums, and Trump constantly threatening to abandon America’s allies and pull the US out of NATO, Europe has been left in a seriously tight spot. But French President Emmanuel Macron isn't just sitting around waiting for the worst to happen. He’s stepping up with a massive power move to show the Kremlin that Europe can bite back. France is using its own nuclear arsenal to keep putin guessing and finally secure the continent with or without Washington. The Telegraph: “This is the moment Emmanuel Macron showed Vladimir Putin he means business. Standing in front of a new nuclear submarine singing La Marseillaise, the French president conveyed one clear message: if it has to, France will use nuclear weapons to protect Europe from Russia. Europe can't defend itself from putin without the United States. But Donald Trump keeps threatening to pull the US out of NATO. We've had no support from, essentially no support from NATO. Mr. Macron thinks he has the solution. Here's how Europe learned to stop worrying and love “la bombe”. France and Britain are Europe's only nuclear powers, but only France has airborne tactical nuclear weapons, which can be launched from its Rafale jets. Now Mr. Macron is signing deals with countries like Britain, Germany, and Poland, making it possible for the jets to land on their bases in a plan he calls "forward deterrence”. But planes will move in secret around Europe, creating a strategic ambiguity that will force putin to think twice before attacking. Allies will perform joint nuclear exercises in a show of strength. Now, tactical nuclear weapons are less powerful than the big missiles launched from submarines like Trident or the French subs, but they are more flexible. Fire a nuke from a sub, and it's the starting gun on World War Three. But a tactical nuke can be a warning shot. Now France's nuclear deterrent is not part of NATO, which means putin has to think about French decision-making, even if he can ignore the US for some reason. This is all creating another European-controlled line of deterrence behind the US shield. Working together, France and Britain can buy precious time for the rest of Europe and themselves to rearm with conventional weapons, including precision long-range missiles capable of striking deep within Russia if vladimir putin ever dares to attack”
1:59

French President Emmanuel Macron has the solution for putin’s daily nuclear sabre-rattling. With putin acting like a delusional, playground bully throwing daily nuclear tantrums, and Trump constantly threatening to abandon America’s allies and pull the US out of NATO, Europe has been left in a seriously tight spot. But French President Emmanuel Macron isn't just sitting around waiting for the worst to happen. He’s stepping up with a massive power move to show the Kremlin that Europe can bite back. France is using its own nuclear arsenal to keep putin guessing and finally secure the continent with or without Washington. The Telegraph: “This is the moment Emmanuel Macron showed Vladimir Putin he means business. Standing in front of a new nuclear submarine singing La Marseillaise, the French president conveyed one clear message: if it has to, France will use nuclear weapons to protect Europe from Russia. Europe can't defend itself from putin without the United States. But Donald Trump keeps threatening to pull the US out of NATO. We've had no support from, essentially no support from NATO. Mr. Macron thinks he has the solution. Here's how Europe learned to stop worrying and love “la bombe”. France and Britain are Europe's only nuclear powers, but only France has airborne tactical nuclear weapons, which can be launched from its Rafale jets. Now Mr. Macron is signing deals with countries like Britain, Germany, and Poland, making it possible for the jets to land on their bases in a plan he calls "forward deterrence”. But planes will move in secret around Europe, creating a strategic ambiguity that will force putin to think twice before attacking. Allies will perform joint nuclear exercises in a show of strength. Now, tactical nuclear weapons are less powerful than the big missiles launched from submarines like Trident or the French subs, but they are more flexible. Fire a nuke from a sub, and it's the starting gun on World War Three. But a tactical nuke can be a warning shot. Now France's nuclear deterrent is not part of NATO, which means putin has to think about French decision-making, even if he can ignore the US for some reason. This is all creating another European-controlled line of deterrence behind the US shield. Working together, France and Britain can buy precious time for the rest of Europe and themselves to rearm with conventional weapons, including precision long-range missiles capable of striking deep within Russia if vladimir putin ever dares to attack”

Yasmina

38,374 views • 3 months ago

‼️Former British diplomat A. Crooke‼️ “The West has now been placed in an all-or-nothing trap. A total game changer!” When it became clear that Russia was clearly winning the war in Ukraine, the West's tactic was to use escalation to force Russia into a corner to the extent that Russia would resort to nuclear tactical weapons. It was this all or nothing trap: either Russia gives in or we force it into (tactical) nuclear escalation. That would have really isolated Putin in the world. That is no longer possible. The tables have been turned. With a conventional weapon like the Oresjnek, the West only has the nuclear card left. The West has now been placed in an all-or-nothing trap. A total game changer! 👇
1:40

‼️Former British diplomat A. Crooke‼️ “The West has now been placed in an all-or-nothing trap. A total game changer!” When it became clear that Russia was clearly winning the war in Ukraine, the West's tactic was to use escalation to force Russia into a corner to the extent that Russia would resort to nuclear tactical weapons. It was this all or nothing trap: either Russia gives in or we force it into (tactical) nuclear escalation. That would have really isolated Putin in the world. That is no longer possible. The tables have been turned. With a conventional weapon like the Oresjnek, the West only has the nuclear card left. The West has now been placed in an all-or-nothing trap. A total game changer! 👇

Mark

60,415 views • 1 year ago

Vladimir Putin has firmly stated that if the U.S allows Ukraine to use long range missiles against Russia… Europe and all NATO countries will be drawn into a Nuclear War.. “You won’t even have to blink your eyes when we carry out Article 5 of the Roman Treaty”… Russia has the most confirmed nuclear weapons, with over 5,500 nuclear warheads.
1:04

Vladimir Putin has firmly stated that if the U.S allows Ukraine to use long range missiles against Russia… Europe and all NATO countries will be drawn into a Nuclear War.. “You won’t even have to blink your eyes when we carry out Article 5 of the Roman Treaty”… Russia has the most confirmed nuclear weapons, with over 5,500 nuclear warheads.

Pelham

1,152,600 views • 1 year ago

President Zelenskyy: China has, for the first time, reacted firmly and in ultimatum-like terms to statements from Russia about the possible use of nuclear weapons, making it clear that even the idea of using them is unacceptable. "Some European leaders told me that they had spoken with Chinese representatives. China reacted very seriously, very firmly, and very clearly to statements in the Russian media about the possible use of nuclear weapons. I think you have heard such voices in the Russian media saying, 'What if we respond to Ukrainian strikes with nuclear weapons?' It is very important to emphasize that it was not only the Europeans, not only the United States, but also China. And it seems to me that, for the first time, China reacted very clearly and very firmly. As the leaders told me, China made it clear in ultimatum-like terms that even the idea of using nuclear weapons is unacceptable."
1:51

President Zelenskyy: China has, for the first time, reacted firmly and in ultimatum-like terms to statements from Russia about the possible use of nuclear weapons, making it clear that even the idea of using them is unacceptable. "Some European leaders told me that they had spoken with Chinese representatives. China reacted very seriously, very firmly, and very clearly to statements in the Russian media about the possible use of nuclear weapons. I think you have heard such voices in the Russian media saying, 'What if we respond to Ukrainian strikes with nuclear weapons?' It is very important to emphasize that it was not only the Europeans, not only the United States, but also China. And it seems to me that, for the first time, China reacted very clearly and very firmly. As the leaders told me, China made it clear in ultimatum-like terms that even the idea of using nuclear weapons is unacceptable."

Anton Gerashchenko

174,859 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi
1:48

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The U.S. is desperately trying to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme while needing to get it back to the negotiating table to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The problem is that one of Iran's most important remaining nuclear facilities is believed to be buried too deep for even America's most powerful conventional bunker-buster bombs to reliably destroy. That has led some analysts to discuss a possibility that until recently would have been almost unthinkable: a U.S. tactical nuclear strike. The greatest danger wouldn't necessarily be Iran's immediate retaliation. It would be breaking an almost 80-year taboo on the use of nuclear weapons. That precedent wouldn't stay in the Middle East. Russia has repeatedly threatened nuclear escalation during the war in Ukraine but has so far stopped short of crossing that line. Part of that restraint comes from the enormous political cost of being the first country since 1945 to use a nuclear weapon in war. If the U.S crosses that line first, it's easier for others to follow. It becomes far harder for Washington and its allies to argue that Russia must never do something they have already done themselves. A tactical nuclear strike might solve one military problem in Iran. But it could also make nuclear weapons politically usable again in every future war that involves a rival with nuclear capabilities. Writer: Mhedi

Mario Nawfal

85,233 views • 1 month ago