Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

«Confusing perspective»

76,707 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля ENERGYtoEXPLORE
ENERGYtoEXPLORE2 лет назад

Reflexion is the Magicians Friend!!

Фото профиля Godssword Edet
Godssword Edet2 лет назад

I was almost lost 😂

Фото профиля Godssword Edet
Godssword Edet2 лет назад

That's thought provoking!

Фото профиля Mabel Gasca
Mabel Gasca2 лет назад

🥶

Фото профиля SKNDOM
SKNDOM2 лет назад

Confusing perspective refers to a situation where the viewer is unsure of the spatial relationships or proportions of objects in a scene. This can happen when objects are positioned in a way that makes it difficult to determine their size or distance from one another, leading to a sense of disorientation or uncertainty. Artists often use confusing perspective as a technique to create visual interest or challenge the viewer's perception.

Фото профиля فياض
فياض2 лет назад

🤣🤣

Фото профиля Dee 😇
Dee 😇2 лет назад

They should level it!!

Фото профиля Spicy memes
Spicy memes2 лет назад

I got fooled also. I am tripping too i guess.

Фото профиля 나범씨
나범씨2 лет назад

🫣

Похожие видео

Here’s Amol Rajan interviewing Mary Anne Stephenson of the EHRC There is one perspective only: the trans perspective, and mainly, the trans XY perspective. Former Head of News Fran Unsworth said in a recent interview: ‘It’s the sea we swim in’. So it is here. The weight of bias becomes most obvious when you imagine the sorts of questions that could be asked by an impartial team. ‘Women have waited for this a long time - how can we be sure that now they really will have single sex spaces for their safety and privacy?’ ‘Some women say you’ve loosened the duty on service providers by using the phrase ‘case by case’. How do you respond?’ ‘Isn’t this draft even more confusing than the first draft when it comes to ‘proportionality’? ‘What about this advice that it’s not appropriate to challenge men in women’s toilets - surely that’s important for enforcement?’ ‘Why do you think so many trans-identified people say they’re determined to breach the law - do you think this guidance will help them to respect it?’ ‘Some campaigners blame the Minister for the confusion because she decided to consult in a way that was never done before trans people were admitted to opposite sex spaces. Are you disappointed it’s taken so long to lay this guidance before parliament?’ ‘Service providers have already had a year to be working on provision - surely they have no more excuses for failing to implement the law?’ This 👆line of questioning is so breathtakingly unlikely ever to happen that the audience becomes dulled to the bias. But don’t ever accept a lower standard, just because those lower standards have prevailed for ten and more years. It’s a very important slot and interview, and the Today programme fluffed it. This is a public service organisation that you pay for, and this was a very poor effort.

SEEN in Journalism

11,149 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

In a groundbreaking moment for Europe, Pope Leo sent a message what true freedom means in contemporary societies. With this, he also defended a seal of confession: (1:20 of the video below) “Without confusing the legal sphere with the moral one, it is also worth recalling that freedom must be understood in its fullness. Being free does not simply mean being free from coercion or having many choices; it means being able to recognize the good and commit to it responsibly. For this reason, every truly free society also requires a proper limitation of public power, so that the freedom of individuals, communities and associations is not unduly restricted (cf. Dignitatis Humanae, 1).” “From this perspective, the legitimate autonomy of the temporal order must never see itself as hostile to religion. Faith does not seek to impose itself through privileges or coercion; yet neither can it be silenced as if it were irrelevant to public life.” “In this context, the sacramental seal of confession holds special importance for the Catholic Church. It is part of the broader sphere of religious freedom, which guarantees believing communities their own space for life, organization and internal discipline (cf. Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, The Helsinki Final Act, 1 August 1975, Principle VII). To protect it legally, as is done in a similar way in some professions, means preserving a sacred space of inner freedom, where the believer can open his or her soul to God without fear of external pressures, as international norms also recognize (cf. International Criminal Court, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Rule 73.3).”

Paulina Guzik

20,614 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

i’ve deffo spoken about this before but it was immediately after the ep and now after a million rewatches it’s still lowkey one of my favourite details so i’m gonna talk about tuna melts again so in filmmaking there’s this “rule” where essentially there’s an invisible line across the space of a scene that the camera shouldn’t cross (to avoid confusing the audience or mixing up the perspectives). when the 180 degree rule is broken, it’s usually done intentionally for a particular purpose or effect. in the tuna melt scene, the camera keeps breaking the 180 degree rule every time there’s a moment of vulnerability - only to be snapped back to the “correct” side each time as shane retreats and puts his walls back up. we switch perspectives when they say each others names for the first time, only to be pulled right back to the other perspective when shane starts to panic. we switch again when ilya says “hollander” to try and convince him to stay, and then back over to the “correct” side when we see shane leaving. (it doesn’t technically break the rule here because of where shane is standing the “line” would technically be behind him, but that would’ve been a really weird shot so imo the point still stands) its really effective and i think the scene is filmed that way to be intentionally jarring. it really shows how every moment of vulnerability is met with an equal amount of resistance from shane. he wasn’t ready to be truly vulnerable with ilya yet. as much as he wants to let go and allow himself this, each crack in ilya’s armour is a reminder to shane to put up another wall and protect himself.

frances 🏒

18,189 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🎙️ DJ Akademiks Reacts to Barbz Twitter Spaces After Nicki Minaj Attends TPUSA AmFest Context: DJ Akademiks reviewed multiple Barbz Twitter Spaces debates reacting to Nicki Minaj’s appearance at Turning Point USA AmFest, where emotions ran high and the fanbase appeared divided. 📌 Why Nicki Minaj Attended TPUSA According to Nicki’s Talking Points: •Her presence was to continue supporting global free speech and global religious freedom •These are causes she’s spoken on for decades, not a sudden shift •She also addressed comments made by California Governor Gavin Newsom Nicki responded to Newsom’s remarks with a public statement criticizing the idea of promoting gender related agendas toward children, emphasizing that adults should prioritize healthy, safe, and happy kids. 🎧 Akademiks Plays the Barbz Twitter Spaces Akademiks played clips from Barbz-hosted Spaces where: •Fans were arguing with each other •Some were angry, others confused •The fanbase appeared deeply split on Nicki’s political involvement Akademiks described the Spaces as: •Emotional •Chaotic •A sign of internal conflict within Nicki’s audience 🤔 Akademiks Breakdown Akademiks explains: •Nicki has always gone against the grain •Some fans assumed her tweets were just trolling •Her public appearance and speech made it clear she was serious This changed the conversation from: “She’s just tweeting” to “She’s publicly co signing ideas many fans don’t agree with” 🌈 Fanbase Tension Akademiks points out: •A large portion of Nicki’s fanbase comes from LGBTQ+ communities •Her stance on children and gender issues directly conflicts with some fans’ worldviews •This created infighting, with fans debating: •Loyalty to Nicki •Personal beliefs •Where support should draw the line 🗣️ Akademiks Approach Akademiks clarified: •He enjoys debate, not pushing beliefs •He doesn’t want his platform to become a politics only show •He wants viewer feedback on how much political discussion people want 📌 Bottom Line •Nicki Minaj stood firm in her beliefs •DJ Akademiks highlighted the real-time fallout among her fans •The situation exposed a larger debate about: •Celebrity politics •Fan loyalty •Children, identity, and government influence Whether fans agree or not, one thing is clear: This wasn’t just a tweet it was a statement. 💭 My Perspective on Kids & Life Altering Decisions I believe allowing children to make permanent, life altering decisions at a young age should not be allowed and here’s why: 🧠 How Children Actually Think Kids are: •Highly indecisive •Extremely curious •Impulsive •Influenced by attention and imitation One day they want to be a prince or princess. The next day, a superhero. The day after that, a villain. This isn’t criticism it’s child development. 👀 Influence & Attention Children: •Copy what they see on TV, social media, and in their environment •Notice when others receive attention and often want the same •Frequently change their minds •Commonly regret decisions once they grow and gain perspective These traits are normal but they’re also the reason kids need protection, not pressure. ⚠️ The Concern Knowing these developmental realities, it raises a serious question: Why would a governor or any government official feel it’s appropriate to push physical or chemical gender changes on children, instead of waiting until adulthood? 📌 Bottom Line This isn’t about hate. This isn’t about denying anyone’s identity. It’s about protecting children during the most confusing, impressionable stage of their lives and allowing irreversible decisions only when someone is fully capable of understanding them. Kids deserve time to grow. Adulthood is when permanent choices should begin.

Cousin Tino ™️

18,116 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

In 1965, radio commentator Paul Harvey delivered a short broadcast that still circulates today called “If I Were the Devil.” It wasn’t a speech about politics or parties. It was more like a thought experiment. He simply asked a question: If someone wanted to slowly undermine a nation, what would they do? Harvey’s answer wasn’t about tanks or invasion. He talked about culture, values, and influence. In his words, the strategy wouldn’t be to destroy America overnight. It would be to weaken it gradually — piece by piece — by confusing people about right and wrong, by normalizing things that once shocked the conscience, and by making the public slowly comfortable with ideas that earlier generations would have rejected outright. He imagined a devil who wouldn’t openly attack faith but would make it unfashionable. A devil who wouldn’t abolish morality but would blur the lines until people stopped recognizing it. A devil who would slowly erode respect for institutions, traditions, and the principles that once held communities together. The reason this broadcast keeps resurfacing decades later is because people hear echoes of modern debates in it. Some listeners think Harvey sounded eerily prophetic. Others think it simply reflects the anxieties every generation has about change. Either way, the clip has taken on a life of its own online because it forces people to think about how societies evolve — and how culture shapes the direction of a country. Whether someone agrees with Paul Harvey’s perspective or not, the broadcast is a fascinating piece of American media history. It reminds people that concerns about cultural decline, moral confusion, and social change didn’t start yesterday. They’ve been part of the national conversation for generations. What’s interesting is that the speech still sparks debate today. Some people hear it and feel like it describes the present perfectly. Others think it’s just a powerful example of storytelling that resonates because it taps into timeless fears about losing the values that once defined a nation. Either way, the reason people continue sharing it nearly sixty years later is simple: it makes you stop and ask a question. If someone wanted to weaken a country slowly… what would it actually look like? And more importantly — would we even recognize it while it was happening?

Restricted Daily

12,000 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Hasan coaches his audience to show charitably to MoistCr1TiKaL in his coverage regardless if Piker thinks Moist gave too much charitability to Ethan Klein Also confirms the Frogan default "He did the first video, I didn't think he gave a fair shake to the situation..I chalked it up to him not being super in tune with what's going on..I even said if Moist knew the extent of the harassment campaigns conducted by Ethan Klein that he would have a different attitude on it..or if he knew about the actual timeline of events" "I think we gotta be tactical here and tactically speaking u gotta think about the utility of assuming MoistCr1TiKaL is perfectly knowledgeable..whether that's the case or not, doesn't matter..Idk if there's a lot of utility bringing that to the forefront rather than being like hey this video was great, there's a lot more information out there..if u take a look at it, I think u would have a diff perspective" "I say this as someone who has been on the receiving end of MoistCr1TiKaL's commentary that I found to be not so nuanced, he very quickly did the Kayagate video and I'm still saying that" "Ethan Klein is a menace..has done everything he claims is being done to him and far worse to numerous content creators..he's vicious..a bully..his community loves it..his community is a snark subreddit" "I do think he's being nicer to Ethan Klein and he should be, in an effort to maintain a fair position while not siding too much with unfavorable parties bc let's be real in the spaces that Moist occupies, in the spaces we all occupy, we are the minority position..in the real world, we're not the minority position" "And that's literally the reason why he was launching this suit against as opposed to xQc, Asmongold, and numerous other ppl..who didn't offer anything extravagant as far as reactions goes in comparison to Morgan, Denims, or even Kaceytron" "I don't know why he always like qualifies it, it's 100% that is the case..u don't have to qualify it this hard, its ur show I'm not implying anything but it's just confusing to me why there is this layer of qualification every time"

yeet

76,394 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

To love India, we have to shift our cognitive lens away from the simple, clean eqns of Euclidean Geometry (where everything fits into neat straight lines) & upgrade to the complex eqns of Fractals (where patterns emerge out of infinite, self-repeating chaos). China built a beautifully engineered machine. India is a self-evolving, organic jungle. A machine is orderly until it breaks; a jungle is chaotic, but it never stops living. Ancient India's strength was its modular decentralization. The central king (Chakravartin) rarely interfered with the local governance laws (Shreni-Dharma of merchant guilds/Grama-Sabhas of villages). Every community had its own unique operating system. When Nooyi says "the beauty of India is in its chaos," she is instinctively recognizing that India's survival mechanism for 5000 yrs has been its ability to absorb, metabolize & integrate turbulence, rather than trying to sanitize it through forced, top-down uniformity. In the Western mindset, "chaos" implies a total lack of structure/failure of a system. But in physics & mathematics, Chaos Theory proves that complex, seemingly random systems actually have deep, underlying patterns & feedback loops that are highly adaptive. Ancient Indian thought, specifically Sankhya Darshana, formalized this exact reality through the interplay of 2 cosmic entities: Purusha & Prakriti. China’s model is built on artificial Purusha: absolute, rigid, uniform order. India’s model is rooted in Prakriti: a living, breathing, non-linear ecosystem where 1000s of variables (languages, sub-cultures, independent decentralized units) interact simultaneously. Prakriti looks chaotic from the outside, but it is highly resilient because a collapse in 1 node does not crash the entire network. Rigidly uniform systems are efficient in the short term, but they suffer from brittleness under unexpected systemic shocks. Order requires single-variable compliance, whereas India operates on multivariable coexistence. In ancient Indian epistemology, the Jain school perfected a highly sophisticated logical framework called Anekantavada (the doctrine of non-absolutism/manyness of reality). It states that reality is infinitely complex & has multiple facets (Ananta-dharmatmakam vastu). No single perspective can claim absolute monopoly over the entire system. A homogenous society (like China) operates like a single-threaded software program. It executes commands seamlessly & cleanly because there are no competing logic loops. India operates like an massive, multi-threaded, open-source asynchronous protocol. It looks messy, it looks confusing & it lacks standard symmetry, but it allows completely contradictory truths, lifestyles & economic layers to occupy the exact same physical space w/o destroying 1 another. 🙏🙏

Parimal

175,943 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Remember when Hank Brennan tried to have a “gotcha!” moment with Dr. Marie Russell, acting as if he knows more than her about dog bites, when he claimed that they’re “routinely referred to as an hourglass shape”? Brennan went so far as to represent that “hourglass” is the industry standard term used to describe the shape of dog bites by experts in an attempt to imply that being unfamiliar with this term suggests one isn’t an expert. ———— Brennan asked: “Well in most professional studies by experts, isn’t it routinely referred to as an hourglass shape?” Dr. Russell replied: “I haven’t seen that at all.” Brennan asked: “Well have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “I’ve read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “No. I have read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you ever read this book (Brennan holds up book)? Do you recognize this as an authority?” Dr. Russell replied: “No.” ———— There’s just one problem for Mr. Brennan. This—the term “hourglass” for describing the shape of dog bites—isn’t a standard known or used industry term, in fact, it isn’t even a term used by experts in the field, nor is it a term used in “professional studies” to describe the shape of dog bites. Unable to find any instances where the term “hourglass” is used in any of the literature, “professional studies”, scientific papers or expert testimony, I decided to consult Hank Brennan’s Dog Bible (I mean book) since he specifically cited to it as being a source that substantiates the supposed established & routine use of this terminology by experts in the field. However, in my quest to determine if this was in fact the case, I scanned through the entirety of Brennan’s “Dog Bites: A Multidisciplinary Perspective” book in order to find what he was referring to. Shockingly, for a term like “hourglass” that Brennan portrayed as being industry nomenclature, or specific verbiage used by experts & in books—particularly Brennan’s book—to describe & expertly qualify the distinct shape of dog bites, this book used the word “hourglass” one time across its 450+ pages. In its singular mention of the word “hourglass”, the book states: “The hourglass shape of a generalized dog bite is clearly different from the typical bow shape of a human bite” (pg. 237). Nowhere in this sentence, page or chapter of the book does it indicate that the word “hourglass” is a widely accepted & used term in the field for describing the shape of dog bites. Based on its singular reference & lack of routine use in this entire book about dog bites, I think it’s safe to say that Hank Brennan is not only wrong, but apparently didn’t read his own reference book—other than perhaps the one page mentioning “hourglass”. ———— Final note on Brennan’s apparent lack of discernment on what constitutes an authoritative source in the field, especially in the areas of science & medicine, and particularly as it relates to expert witness testimony: It’d also appear that Brennan is confusing “professional studies” with peer reviewed studies. This seems to be further reinforced by the fact that he leaned on “books” as a default authority source, when in actuality, it is very well understood both in the medical/scientific community, as well as in the legal world of expert witnesses, that the unequivocally reliable authoritative source is the peer-reviewed study—sometimes referred to as “articles” (aka academic research articles). You probably recall hearing Dr. Russell refer to many such “articles” (peer reviewed studies) throughout the hearing. Peer-reviewed studies, unlike “professional studies”, are academic research articles that undergo rigorous scrutiny by experts in the field (peers) before publication. This process ensures the quality, validity & originality of the research—unlike say a book, for instance, which has no barrier to publication. #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

31,675 просмотров • 1 год назад

🎙️ Charlamagne Tha God & The Breakfast Club Call Out Media Lies Defends DJ Akademiks…. Charlamagne Also Allegedly Mentions By The End Of The Year He Will Let It Be Known If He’s In The Illuminati 👀🤔 Context: During a live Twitch stream, Charlamagne and The Breakfast Club discussed media credibility, calling out bloggers and personalities who spread misinformation. When DJ Akademiks’ name popped up in the chat, Charlamagne stopped everything to address it directly. 🔹 KEY MOMENTS & QUOTES 🕐 Trust in Media Charlamagne explains that this isn’t about giving “false stories” attention it’s about helping audiences recognize who’s credible in today’s media landscape, especially on YouTube and social platforms. 🕐 Why Some Platforms Don’t Grow “You wonder why you’re not growing… it’s because people can’t trust you.” Charlamagne says real growth comes from getting it right more than wrong, not chasing clicks. 🕐 The Attention Addiction He calls out blogs that lie for headlines, saying many mistake attention for real success, confusing viral moments with actual influence. 🕐 Call Out the Liars Charlamagne challenges the chat to name names, stressing that audiences already know who lies they just keep consuming it anyway. 🔥 DJ AKADEMIKS MOMENT 🕐 Charlamagne on Akademiks “Y’all saying Akademiks that’s not true. Ak is more right than he is wrong.” Charlamagne explains: •Akademiks actually reaches out to labels and people close to situations •He gets information from real industry sources •Having an opinion ≠ lying This moment clearly separates opinions vs misinformation. 🕐 Bias Acknowledged Charlamagne admits Akademiks rides for Drake but says that doesn’t invalidate his reporting. 📊 MEDIA METRICS & RATINGS TALK 🕐 Radio & Ratings Explained Charlamagne breaks down how demographics and ratings really work, calling out people who talk numbers without understanding them. 🕐 Advertisers Care About Demos Advertisers spend money based on specific demographics, not internet narratives. 🏆 THE BREAKFAST CLUB LEGACY 15 Years Strong The Breakfast Club celebrates: •15 years on air •#1 in multiple demos •Still evolving while others fade 🔮 BIG PICTURE MESSAGE 2025: Year of the Snake Charlamagne says 2025 is about: •Shedding what no longer serves you •Endings leading to new beginnings •Karma, transition, and growth 🎯 FINAL TAKEAWAY ✔️ Credibility > Clicks ✔️ Opinions aren’t lies ✔️ Real media sources do the work ✔️ Stop hating on who you should be learning from Notable Moment: Charlamagne publicly co-signing DJ Akademiks as a reliable source more often than not stood out especially in today’s messy media climate. IN CLIP 2 👁️ Charlamagne Continues His Constant Saying Of Illuminati “Confirmations” Coming Before Year’s End 👀 Context: During a live moment on The Breakfast Club, Charlamagne addressed ongoing Illuminati jokes and conspiracy talk and left listeners with a wild tease. 🔥 KEY MOMENTS 🗣️ Charlamagne Tha God: “All Illuminati confirmations will be confirmed before the year is over. I just want y’all to know that.” He follows up with gratitude and perspective, saluting everyone doing their thing and reminding others that losing a position can be divine redirection, not failure. 🙏 MESSAGE BEHIND THE JOKE ✔️ God’s plan > public opinion ✔️ New endings create new beginnings ✔️ Success for you even if you wish me the opposite Charlamagne makes it clear: He’s not naming names, not switching energy, and not feeding internet narratives. 👀 DJ ENVY REACTS 🗣️ DJ Envy: “Whatever you doing in the Illuminati, you gotta tell me… You bending over? If they need an intern, I don’t mind.” The room erupts as the moment turns into classic Breakfast Club humor. 🎯 TAKEAWAY Whether serious or sarcasm, Charlamagne once again: • Controls the narrative • Keeps people guessing • Turns conspiracy talk into engagement 👀

Cousin Tino ™️

33,992 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Phenomena, AAWSAP, Stratton and Consciousness "I keenly believe that consciousness is a key aspect of all of this, and perception." ~Jay Stratton ~ "I entered the [AATIP] program in 2008. I was asked by its director [Lacatski] to come on board and establish this program [AATIP]. And then, in 2010 is when I was asked to take over the effort." ~Lue Elizondo during WaPo Interview "Fast forward to 2015...I created a program called AATIP, which was a derivative of AAWSAP." ~Jay Stratton (As I've discussed before, AATIP (V2) didn't exist until much later (2015) than what we've been told by Lue. So what program did Lue come on board to in 2008 and which program did he "take over the effort" for in 2010 if AATIP (V2) was created by Stratton in 2015? Is that not a fair question to ask?) ~~~ Jay Stratton: "Starting back in the early 2000s, we saw the need - my colleague (Jim Lacatski. ~Joe) and I at the Defense Intelligence Agency - to start paying very close attention to this topic. Advanced technologies, emerging technologies, and really kind of the areas that the stigma has led for us to ignore for many years. "So, you know, we created a program that Hal (Puthoff) referred to as AAWSAP, you know, to address those issues. And that really started around 2005. So the DIA program, which you jumped in earlier and said the DOE or, you know, the DOD's program, and really, it's the Intelligence Community's program. DIA is part of the IC, the D in there being Defense, predominantly means the DIA looks at foreign-defense capabilities. "And we were looking at this from - and I hate to say it now - but a threat perspective. And the reason I say, 'I hate to say,' is because threat is capability plus intent, and some of these things, we just don't have an idea on the intent." (Does that mean that on some of these things we DO have an idea on the intent?) Stratton: "So, determining threat, you know, maybe it's an emerging-technologies threat or a concern anytime it can potentially exceed our own capabilities. But that DIA program focused on that, and the contract from 2008 to 2010, and then we transitioned and tried to move the program to a couple of other places. "Fast forward to 2015, I created a program called AATIP, which was a derivative of AAWSAP, and actually AATIP was a nickname for AAWSAP. And I know there's a lot of crazy names, but Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. But those 2015 events were the ones that you see now on the news: the Gimbal, the Go Fast. Ryan Graves, who usually participates in this, his wife is having a baby, currently, so he's not here (laughs). But all of those events started to happen...and those events helped fuel, you know, further highlight that need on the U.S. government side that, we gotta do something about this. "Which led to the creation of the UAP Task Force in 2018 into 2019 as when I started building it. I spent over two years building it out before the public even knew about it in 2020 when DoD established it. And at that point, it was truly a whole-of-government, interagency effort. Kind of the dream of, you know, my fifteen-years plus, at that point of looking at this topic and knowing everything that we needed with all the different authorities." (Much more on that can be found here: ) Stratton: "And that led into where we're at today with AARO, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office under DOD. And I think, you know, a few hiccups here and there, but I think now Dr Jon Koslowski, who has AARO, is approaching this problem set and dealing with the topic appropriately." (He seems like a good guy but James Fox recently said that he met with Kosloski who told him (Fox) that he (Kosloski) can't even part his hair without the DoD's permission. If that's true, and I have no reason to doubt Fox on that, I have little hope AARO will help bring Disclosure.) Stratton: "And I hope that, you know, obviously, my legacy, or the legacy of all of those involved, carries on, and that the government continues to take it seriously. And that we never have to look a pilot in the eyes again and say, 'Sorry, can't help you,' you know? Or the ridicule factor and all these other issues that happen from that." (If you want a true, lasting legacy... Push to be the UAP Czar, start another AAWSAP-like program, and do it for a few years until the world learns the truth about us not being alone on this planet and that we have craft and bodies of NHI. Allegedly, right? And help us figure out what the hell the phenomenon represents.) Stratton: "So, I mean, that's kind of the the cliff notes and the history. But the UAP Task Force recently got an award from the DNI. It's the first UFO program to get an award at that level, to my knowledge. And I'm really proud of where we're at today and and that we can have events like these to discuss this topic seriously, and everybody that's involved in putting their brands on this problem." (More on that award... ) Stratton: "I don't think we should overlook...and you had, you know, Paul (Smith) and others talk about remote viewing and that consciousness connection. I keenly believe that consciousness is a key aspect of all of this, and perception, you know, all the things that come from that. And that's an area that can get confusing, right? If you look at all of these recent drones, day-to-day, right? It's honestly driving me crazy because people are throwing in, you know, video of a Cessna Citation on final approach and calling it a UAP, you know? It's definitely a Cessna Citation. "And then folks start throwing around (laughs) the terms mimicry and other things that we've definitely looked at. And it gets like the Skinwalker Ranch, as you know I'm involved out there. You know, the things that you see, and are you really...you know, how is your brain forming that thing you're seeing and can that be manipulated? And I think that that technology is an area that, you know, I certainly focused on with my friends, Hal and others, to try to understand it." (Manipulation and perception deception. Is it a byproduct of the technology on our brains, or is it an intentional effort to deceive us? If it's the latter, that certainly doesn't seem to be a good thing for humanity, but I'm still open to all theories.) Stratton: "And that consciousness connection could be a key to understanding how some of these UAP are flying, you know, how they're acting, how they're controlled, I guess is the best way to put it, right?" (Are the craft controlled by some sort of 6th sense that the operators have and need in order to fly a craft?) Stratton: "So, you got to have that kind of open mindedness to approach this topic and I hope that my government, you know, folks are open to those kinds of things. And I know that there are still some key players that are open and thinking about...thinking out of the box about all those kinds of things. So, I mean, I think consciousness is the area that I would want to put more resources and time into if I were still there. (Yes, yes and yes. Bring back Stratton as the UAP and Consciousness Czar!) Anna Brady-Estevez: "And it's interesting because there's quite a bit of access to consciousness, you know, on a personal level-type experimentation. So it is interesting in that, you know, to get into UAPs, I mean, maybe you've seen one or more, maybe you haven't. But, if you haven't, you're kind of digging through other people's data. Whereas some of these consciousness or the remote viewing, it really just takes a couple people and a sheet of paper. So you can kind of step away pretty quickly from the, 'Do I believe the reports?' you know? Or somebody else's versus you can get to that primary experimentation at the cost of a sheet of paper, a pencil, and fifteen minutes or more of somebody's time here, at the most basic level. I mean, obviously there's extensive training to build the high-end capabilities. But some of that initial testing is pretty immediate. So thank you for bringing up that consciousness work." (When I took a basic Controlled Remove Viewing class with Lyn Buchanan (one of the OG remote viewers) in 1997, I saw the results for myself when I tried it. And right there and then, I KNEW that it worked. So people can debate with me all day long about the validity of psi and remote viewing but they won't change my mind. Seeing (and trying it for yourself) is believing.) Stratton: "I was gonna say, it took me years to move away from that nuts and bolts mentality of, you know, as an aerospace engineer, this is how it flies, thrust, you know, power, etc, you know, to...there's a lot more to this, right? Hence the name, you know, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, or Aerial Phenomena, however you want to look at it. That phenomena word is key in the definition and understanding of all of this." (Big H/T to neandrewthal and anybody else who let me know about this event Stratton was a part of.)

Joe Murgia

69,993 просмотров • 1 год назад

My cousin, Jonathan Ord asked me to teach the Come Follow Me lesson to his mission yesterday over zoom. This is the video I did and the full text. Hi. I am Brad Smith. I have ALS, which is a really weird disease that kills the motor neurons in my body. That means that I lose the connections between my brain and my muscles. My mind is still running at the normal rate. So, I can understand everything you say to me, but I can’t respond very quickly! I am getting faster, though. Last November I was the 3rd person in the world to receive the Neuralink brain implant. So I am controlling this computer with my brain. This is my old voice, recreated by AI from just two hours of me talking to my phone. I have come to see ALS as a calling, and I am trying to magnify it. I used to talk easily, but now I have to choose my words carefully, because it is hard and slow to type what I want to say. I joke that the Lord gave me ALS to get me to shut up. Those who knew me when I could talk laugh the hardest. President Ord is my first cousin. So we share grandma and grandpa Smith. Our grandma Smith was a character. When she taught at church, she would put a sign up that read: “thus saith the lord:” so I will try to keep this within what the Lord has actually said, while trying to teach you to look at a basic principle of the gospel in a different way. Ironically, the first verse of Doctrine & Covenants 93 starts with “Verily, thus saith the Lord”. This is an amazing section of scripture, Jesus Christ telling us to step up and be better! You should study it often. I will start with a story. I asked AI to make a video to dramatically tell the story. During college, I lived in Damascus, Syria, for a semester. It was a fantastic and wonderful experience. I especially loved exploring the Old City of Damascus. The Old City is built around the huge beautiful Umayyad mosque. Within the walls of the old city is a maze of narrow, winding, confusing streets and one really long straight street, as Saul found out in Acts 9:11. One day when a group of us were trying to get through this maze from the mosque to the Christian quarter of the Old City, we asked a man for directions. He thought for a second, then pointed and said, “Go left and then right, and then left and then right, and then left and then right, and then left and right, and you’ll be there.” Aren’t those the most ridiculous directions you have ever heard? We could have ignored him. But, we thought, he did know the city better than we did. So, with some laughter, off we went. Left. Right. Left. Right. And so on until, much to our surprise, we popped out at our destination. Life is a confusing maze. We face difficult choices, unexpected events, surprises, sorrows, opportunities, roadblocks. The Lord has given directions on how to get through to where we want to go. Sometimes the Lord’s directions seem odd, and we may struggle with the decision to follow. The Lord will not force us. It is our choice whether to choose and follow him. Wasn’t that fun? AI is getting crazy! I will be much less entertaining for the rest, but hopefully the spirit will teach you something new. The phrase “keep the commandments” (or “keepeth my commandments”) appears at least 4 times in Doctrine and Covenants Section 93, in verses 1, 20, 27, and 28. There are other references, like “keep my sayings” in 52 and “obeyeth my voice” in 1. So, commandments are really important in this Revelation. I suggest that making the gospel a more central part of our lives depends largely on how we look at commandments. When you think of commandments, do you think “I can’t. I’m Mormon”? (That was a popular T-shirt slogan during my college years.) Although, with the recent guidance from President Nelson, it probably should be “I can’t, I’m a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints”. It’s a common reaction: “Thou shalt not do Cool Things.” People LOVE to focus on all the things we CAN’T do, as if we are trapped and deserve pity for our beliefs. No pity is needed. Commandments are opportunities, not constraints. Commandments are awesome! Allow me to illustrate. Imagine a spectrum between Good and Evil. Somewhere in the middle is “the Line” that divides Good from Evil. As a teenager, I wanted to know where the Line was, so I could get close to it without going over it. I wanted to be on the “Good” side but still be able to do as many “Cool Things" with my friends as possible. From my experience, I believe God gives us two types of commandments: 1) Get Back over the Line commandments and 2) Come Further into the Light commandments. Type 1, the Get Back over the Line commandments, could also be called “Misery Avoidance” commandments. They are designed to keep us out of misery or, if we’ve crossed the Line, to bring us out of misery and back into the Good side. These are generally commandments with a clear and defined point of success, such as “Thou shalt not kill.” You will know, at the end of each day, whether you have successfully followed that commandment. I think all of the Ten Commandments fall into this category. The law of Moses was very black and white. The children of Israel had been in Egypt without a prophet for a long time when Moses received the law, and they needed to work on the basics. So, if you follow the Type 1 commandments, you will refrain from doing things that make you miserable. You will know you are in the Good if you can answer the baptismal interview and temple recommend questions honestly and faithfully. If you can do that, you have taken the basic steps necessary to avoid misery and are on a solid foundation for the next type of commandment. Type 2, the “Come Further into the Light” commandments, are the really cool commandments. Once we are out of the misery category, we can really start to pursue joy. So, God commands us to do things that he knows will make us happier and more like Christ. These commandments are the principles of eternal development, such as “Love thy neighbor” (Matthew 22:39). There is no clear end to loving our neighbor—it requires positive and eternal progression. We can always love more, and we can always find another neighbor who needs our love. It is an eternal principle taught by Jesus Christ. And if we truly love our neighbor, refraining from killing him becomes pretty easy. It is through these commandments that we find joy in Jesus Christ. Elder Christofferson taught about this spectrum in the October 2018 general conference: “Most of us find ourselves at this moment on a continuum between a socially motivated participation in gospel rituals on the one hand and a fully developed, Christlike commitment to the will of God on the other. Somewhere along that continuum, the good news of the gospel of Jesus Christ enters into our heart and takes possession of our soul. It may not happen in an instant, but we should all be moving toward that blessed state.” Our goal is to go THAT WAY (toward Christ) as much as possible. So first, get back across the line and stop doing things that will make you miserable. Then make every effort to try and be like Jesus, to “love one another as Jesus loves you.” The gospel of Jesus Christ is more than just “not doing” stuff. It is about coming unto Christ, being perfected in him, and denying ourselves of all ungodliness. Discuss with your companion what commandments and mission rules are for “Misery Avoidance” and which are “Come Further into the Light”! And, remember, commandments are ALWAYS connected to huge blessings. The Lord promised, “There is a law, irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, upon which all blessings are predicated—and when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated” (Doctrine and Covenants 130:20–21). Whenever we obey any of God’s commandments, we will get the blessing associated with that commandment. Elder David A. Bednar said: “The gospel of Jesus Christ encompasses much more than avoiding, overcoming, and being cleansed from sin and the bad influences in our lives; it also essentially entails doing good, being good, and becoming better. Repenting of our sins and seeking forgiveness are spiritually necessary, and we must always do so. But remission of sin is not the only or even the ultimate purpose of the gospel. To have our hearts changed by the Holy Spirit such that “we have no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually” (Mosiah 5:2), as did King Benjamin’s people, is the covenant responsibility we have accepted. “This mighty change is not simply the result of working harder or developing greater individual discipline. Rather, it is the consequence of a fundamental change in our desires, our motives, and our natures made possible through the Atonement of Christ the Lord. Our spiritual purpose is to overcome both sin and the desire to sin, both the taint and the tyranny of sin.” I LOVE this concept—and as I have paid attention, I feel like apostles are trying to teach us this all the time. Are we listening? Let me repeat what Elder Bednar said. He said that the commandments help us change what we WANT. Why is that important? Remember my teenage desires? I wanted to be as close to the line as possible so I could still look cool for my friends. That is a good example of the “tyranny” of sin. Even though I was not actually sinning (probably because I was afraid of my mother), I still had some small desire to sin. I said, “I can’t. I’m Mormon” with many dramatic sighs. Overcoming the tyranny of sin is getting to the point where the sin no longer looks remotely interesting or fun because we are too busy loving our neighbors and trying to be like Jesus. Elder Dallin H. Oaks said: “The Final Judgment is not just an evaluation of a sum total of good and evil acts—what we have done. It is an acknowledgment of the final effect of our acts and thoughts—what we have become. It is not enough for anyone just to go through the motions. The commandments, ordinances, and covenants of the gospel are not a list of deposits required to be made in some heavenly account. The gospel of Jesus Christ is a plan that shows us how to become what our Heavenly Father desires us to become.” This talk was given when I was on a mission, before most of you were born. It completely changed my perspective on the gospel of Jesus Christ. It is called The Challenge to Become” and I recommend that you study it. When the Lord says keep the commandments, he isn’t just telling us to stop sinning—he wants us to become like Christ and to have joy. Take a moment and think, Where am I on this continuum? Remember that none of us is perfect like the Savior, and we all need to lift one another. That is why we worship together. That is why we have priesthood quorums and the Relief Society, Primary, and youth organizations. The Lord taught us that truth when he said we all have different gifts: “To some is given one [gift], and to some is given another [gift], that all may be profited thereby. To some it is given by the Holy Ghost to know that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and that he was crucified for the sins of the world. To others it is given to believe on their words, that they also might have eternal life if they continue faithful” (Doctrine and Covenants 46:12–14). The Savior is still WAY over there: a thousand miles away somewhere. That is why we have quorums. We all have a long way to go. Let’s link arms and run together. Let me finish by telling a story from my mission to support my testimony of Jesus. Years ago my mission president said something interesting: “Either the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is truly the kingdom of god on the earth... or it is the greatest fraud ever in history.“ It is audacious to claim to be the true Church of Jesus Christ—but let me explain exactly why I know that to be true. I always BELIEVED that I was raised in the gospel of Jesus Christ. My parents taught me well and I felt good following the commandments and studying the scriptures. That led me to serve a mission in Brazil. My turning point of testimony came when I was 20–at least 2/3rds through my mission. We were invited into a house in the “fundos” of a property—a small structure built behind a larger house. The man was polite and allowed us to share our message. As I had done hundreds of times, I shared the story of Joseph Smith, a boy who sought the truth through prayer. I recited Joseph’s own words in response to his prayer: “I saw a pillar of light exactly over my head, above the brightness of the sun, which descended gradually until it fell upon me... When the light rested upon me I saw two Personages, whose brightness and glory defy all description, standing above me in the air. One of them spake unto me, calling me by name and said, pointing to the other—This is My Beloved Son. Hear Him!" I felt the strongest feeling I had ever experienced—an undeniable confirmation that what I said was true. It hit me in a way I can never forget! I knew that Joseph Smith was truly a prophet, and therefore the Book of Mormon was the word of god. What about the man we were teaching? How had he responded to my life-affirming spiritual experience? He shrugged and politely thanked us for the message. I was stunned. I felt like the windows of heaven opened on me—and he felt nothing. I learned that receiving answers to our prayers is like tuning a radio: not everyone is on the right frequency. For some reason, the Lord decided to broadcast on my frequency that day. I received the undeniable confirmation that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is true. I have built on that foundation brick by brick since then. And every time someone has challenged me on Joseph Smith, I go back to that day in Brazil. I know that he was a prophet. My life has been blessed in ridiculously good ways since then. As I have tried to follow Jesus Christ, great things have happened to me. Even my hardest and most frustrating times have turned out to have a purpose. God has upturned my best laid plans over and over. But I look back and realize that I could never have planned any better. With the prophet Nephi I say: “I know that [God] loveth his children; nevertheless, I do not know the meaning of all things." (1 Nephi 11:17) When I say that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is true, that does not mean we have a monopoly on truth. I know Christians and Muslims who teach me to be better—and Members of the church who are far from disciples of Christ. We just have more truth: scriptures, living prophets, ordinances, personal revelation, and answers to many of life’s biggest questions! That is pretty cool. But we can’t be prideful about the truth we have. You have all probably met people to admire both inside and outside of the church. So, I am all in. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is true—not a big fraud. And we are all trying to get closer to Christ. I know that Heavenly Father has a plan for me. Life has not been what I expected, but I trust him! I know that Joseph Smith is a prophet of Jesus Christ and that the Book of Mormon is true. This is “intelligence, or, in other words, light and truth. Light and truth forsake that evil one.” With that knowledge, keep the commandments! In the name of Jesus Christ, amen .

Bradford G Smith (Brad)

20,383 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад