Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Cornell 7 sexual assault case update Chris Cuomo interviewed Cornell victim Doe's attorney. Below is that interview. As we look at both sides of the pancake, it's important to take in everything available. Note that some are saying the New York civil court filing names DOE. It doesn't. The...

CoffindafferFBI's profile picture

Jennifer Coffindaffer

119,862 subscribers

16,425 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

22 Yorum

Deanna profil fotoğrafı
Deanna3 gün önce

Their were NO charges filed to begin w/bcuz of her own admissions. I don't know how I feel about this. The whole thing was gross on the guys part but she seemed fairly willing until money got involved. She wasnt passed out she was engaging in drug use and sex w/2 at a time.

Jennifer Coffindaffer profil fotoğrafı
Jennifer Coffindaffer3 gün önce

Good points. But did she consent with the others? Because she freely took the drugs that inebriated her, due to New York law, she may be without a defense.

Deanna profil fotoğrafı
Deanna3 gün önce

Well she didn't say NO did she? No where in her statement does she ever say she said NO

Jennifer Coffindaffer profil fotoğrafı
Jennifer Coffindaffer3 gün önce

In her filings.

Deanna profil fotoğrafı
Deanna3 gün önce

Was that after her original statement when they didnt press charges? Because what I read she didn't. She may have in her new filings.

Deanna profil fotoğrafı
Deanna3 gün önce

Her names Lucy Craig she shouldn't be called Jan Doe. She wants to name all the men then her name should be viral as well

Leila Mitchell profil fotoğrafı
Leila Mitchell3 gün önce

She was a victim. No one on copious amounts of alcohol and drugs including ketamine which is a known date rape drug, can consent to what happened to her. It’s very common to think in the beginning what happened was your fault especially with the memory being hazy.

Desleigh Joye profil fotoğrafı
Desleigh Joye3 gün önce

I’m withholding any commentary at this point. Three sides to every story.

Kinzua profil fotoğrafı
Kinzua3 gün önce

The fix is in now. Kathy Hochul just appointed Letitia James as special prosecutor. Letitia will find a crime even if she has to plant evidence.

Critical Mass profil fotoğrafı
Critical Mass3 gün önce

Based on what I’ve read, it seems no one involved at that frat house that night was behaving appropriately, including the female. I see this for what it is-stoking division before the midterms. Both sides of the aisle have been gearing up on X. You can’t ignore it.

Mary C profil fotoğrafı
Mary C3 gün önce

I don’t believe any rape took place. All were drunk & high. Raunchy texts, the horror 🤦‍♀️. Money is the motive

MIA profil fotoğrafı
MIA3 gün önce

Without wrongdoing 😂 men!

Sly Tony Sylvester profil fotoğrafı
Sly Tony Sylvester3 gün önce

So...she's suing for moral support?

GAGuajira profil fotoğrafı
GAGuajira3 gün önce

Thank you for this. We are in such desperate need to be able to see both things, in my opinion. Legally, the law may block the consent after substances issue, which is separate from calling despicable behavior despicable. If someone is inebriated and under the influence, where are the men that see the issue of the HUMAN lack of real consent there?? This is also part of the conversation.

The Porcelain Dalmatian profil fotoğrafı
The Porcelain Dalmatian3 gün önce

You lost me at "Chris Cuomo"

RiceMice profil fotoğrafı
RiceMice3 gün önce

This case is hard for me to comprehend. Jane Doe was accepted into a prestigious university and went to a frat party, taking illegal Ketamine (an anesthesia drug) and other substances believing she is safe?

Pajamas🎉 profil fotoğrafı
Pajamas🎉3 gün önce

Free Palestine has entered the chat

Mark Denny profil fotoğrafı
Mark Denny3 gün önce

The case gives away her name indirectly as the attorney appearing pro hac vice is from Birmingham where the individual that has been named is from and she went to Cornell and was a tridelt. No matter the outcome I’m sad as a father of 2 daughters.

Pajamas🎉 profil fotoğrafı
Pajamas🎉3 gün önce

No matter what the facts are, unfortunately, the media and the propaganda machine are going to run in only 1 direction. It's so disheartening that truth, facts don't really matter once the media is spin has started. I agree that these guys were gross and their behavior was awful, however the media and the TikTok propaganda machine won't care about the text messages she sent and anything else that contradicts the spin on the story.

GAGuajira profil fotoğrafı
GAGuajira3 gün önce

Here’s the thing with cases like these. There is how the evidence will hold up in court and then there are the acts. One does not necessarily negate the other. Even if it becomes a legal nothing burger, it doesn’t mean it was a nothing burger.

Have Bacon Will Eat It profil fotoğrafı
Have Bacon Will Eat It3 gün önce

What those boys did was disgusting, she consented to their disgusting behavior and even said afterword's she enjoyed it with at least two of the men. She seemed to have bragged about it to her friends as if it was a badge of honor something to check off her college experiance

AprilShowers profil fotoğrafı
AprilShowers3 gün önce

Too many variables in this case, my own personal assumptions aside, not sure what will happen or can happen. It’s in the hands of social media now 😵‍💫

Benzer Videolar

Cornell University President Michael I. Kotlikoff released a public statement throwing the Cornell 7 under the bus, confidently stating, contrary to Cornell’s own internal Title IX investigation, that Jane Doe, also known as Lucy Craig, was a survivor of “sexual assault.” Kotlikoff also commended Governor Hochul’s decision to appoint Attorney General Letitia James to oversee the case and potentially press criminal charges against the young men who have had their reputations ruined in the fallout of Craig’s widely-publicized, but utterly unsubstantiated, allegations. Follow: AF Post
8:21

Cornell University President Michael I. Kotlikoff released a public statement throwing the Cornell 7 under the bus, confidently stating, contrary to Cornell’s own internal Title IX investigation, that Jane Doe, also known as Lucy Craig, was a survivor of “sexual assault.” Kotlikoff also commended Governor Hochul’s decision to appoint Attorney General Letitia James to oversee the case and potentially press criminal charges against the young men who have had their reputations ruined in the fallout of Craig’s widely-publicized, but utterly unsubstantiated, allegations. Follow: AF Post

AF Post

218,405 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Everyone is getting the Jane Doe/Cornell case wrong. No, we shouldn’t automatically assume seven young men are guilty and destroy their lives before they’ve even been charged. But there’s also an important part of the story many on the right are missing: Jane Doe apparently DID tell Cornell Police in 2024 that she believed she was assaulted. This case is far more complicated than either side wants to admit. And it raises a much bigger conversation about alcohol, consent, personal responsibility, and why we’re doing young men AND women a disservice by pretending these situations are always black and white. Let’s talk about it.
24:26

Everyone is getting the Jane Doe/Cornell case wrong. No, we shouldn’t automatically assume seven young men are guilty and destroy their lives before they’ve even been charged. But there’s also an important part of the story many on the right are missing: Jane Doe apparently DID tell Cornell Police in 2024 that she believed she was assaulted. This case is far more complicated than either side wants to admit. And it raises a much bigger conversation about alcohol, consent, personal responsibility, and why we’re doing young men AND women a disservice by pretending these situations are always black and white. Let’s talk about it.

Natalie Jean Beisner

18,731 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

Social media has exploded in rage at a group of seven college students who have been accused of gang raping another student back in 2024 at Cornell University. The purported victim, identified only as Jane Doe, has filed a civil lawsuit against both these students and the university. Unfortunately for Jane Doe, she gave a sworn statement to police back in 2024 that details a lengthy saga of depraved, degenerate sexual behavior and drug use, but suggests that all the appalling sexual conduct was consensual and therefore not criminal. The line prosecutor declined to prosecute the young men based on that statement, but social media outrage has led to the reopening of the case, and New York Governor Kathy Hochul replacing the line prosecutor with Letitia James, the current attorney general of New York. My guest on this episode of Counterweight is Heather Mac Donald (Heather Mac Donald) , the Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute. A contributing editor of City Journal, and the New York Times bestselling author of The War on Cops. She has been writing about campus rape hoaxes and about the bizarre sexual culture on college campuses for decades. She walks through what Jane Doe is accusing these young men of, why the accusation does not hold, and why they are innocent. We also talk about what conservatives can do about the Bacchanal on campus and how to push these schools back towards actually educating their students.
40:14

Sensitive content

Social media has exploded in rage at a group of seven college students who have been accused of gang raping another student back in 2024 at Cornell University. The purported victim, identified only as Jane Doe, has filed a civil lawsuit against both these students and the university. Unfortunately for Jane Doe, she gave a sworn statement to police back in 2024 that details a lengthy saga of depraved, degenerate sexual behavior and drug use, but suggests that all the appalling sexual conduct was consensual and therefore not criminal. The line prosecutor declined to prosecute the young men based on that statement, but social media outrage has led to the reopening of the case, and New York Governor Kathy Hochul replacing the line prosecutor with Letitia James, the current attorney general of New York. My guest on this episode of Counterweight is Heather Mac Donald (Heather Mac Donald) , the Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute. A contributing editor of City Journal, and the New York Times bestselling author of The War on Cops. She has been writing about campus rape hoaxes and about the bizarre sexual culture on college campuses for decades. She walks through what Jane Doe is accusing these young men of, why the accusation does not hold, and why they are innocent. We also talk about what conservatives can do about the Bacchanal on campus and how to push these schools back towards actually educating their students.

Will Chamberlain

17,625 görüntüleme • 19 saat önce

Cornell 7 Really sickening that these drug-fueled orgies happen on Ivy League campuses, or any college campus for that matter. But was what happened criminal under New York state law? The answer is likely: No. And what about those accused? Was Jane Doe lucid enough to correctly identify those who allegedly raped her? It seems 3 men stated they have been falsely accused. And what about those individuals who sided with Doe on campus, repulsed by the "free pussy" text? Take a look. #Cornell7 #Cornell
1:15

Cornell 7 Really sickening that these drug-fueled orgies happen on Ivy League campuses, or any college campus for that matter. But was what happened criminal under New York state law? The answer is likely: No. And what about those accused? Was Jane Doe lucid enough to correctly identify those who allegedly raped her? It seems 3 men stated they have been falsely accused. And what about those individuals who sided with Doe on campus, repulsed by the "free pussy" text? Take a look. #Cornell7 #Cornell

Jennifer Coffindaffer

15,051 görüntüleme • 15 saat önce

The smoking gun in the Cornell gang rape case is that Jane Doe told campus police she was raped, and they intentionally omitted this from the 6-page summary given to prosecutors: “I can say with 100% confidence that I was raped.” Omitting that statement is a full-blown cover-up by campus police to protect the rapists. Another smoking gun is that one of the fraternity brothers who was downstairs told campus police that he questioned whether it was consensual and was sorry for not stopping it: “I was sorry that if it wasn’t consensual and she was victimized, I was sorry for not stopping it.” Too many people jumped to conclusions in this case without reviewing the facts and the facts show Cornell campus police engaged in a cover up by failing to provide prosecutors with the victim’s own statement where she says she was raped.
1:56

The smoking gun in the Cornell gang rape case is that Jane Doe told campus police she was raped, and they intentionally omitted this from the 6-page summary given to prosecutors: “I can say with 100% confidence that I was raped.” Omitting that statement is a full-blown cover-up by campus police to protect the rapists. Another smoking gun is that one of the fraternity brothers who was downstairs told campus police that he questioned whether it was consensual and was sorry for not stopping it: “I was sorry that if it wasn’t consensual and she was victimized, I was sorry for not stopping it.” Too many people jumped to conclusions in this case without reviewing the facts and the facts show Cornell campus police engaged in a cover up by failing to provide prosecutors with the victim’s own statement where she says she was raped.

Power to the People ☭🕊

51,739 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

The Cornell 7 case is getting a lot of attention on social media. Before I dive in, I want to make clear that I wasn’t there. I don’t know what happened. But I will say that posting “free pussy” in a group chat and having group sex with an inebriated girl is disgusting even if she did consent. Here are my early thoughts on what will happen with the case: I’m a former prosecutor who now represents victims, including filing civil lawsuits on behalf of rape victims. I believe them, and I understand the psychology of sexual assault and why such a small percentage of perpetrators are ever brought to justice. But when a District Attorney issues a public and detailed statement explaining why your own client’s statement shows she consented to the sexual activity, that’s bad for your case. Now why the DA would take a dump on a civil lawsuit to defend his office is a different question altogether, but maybe he felt there was too much pressure not to explain why he didn’t file charges. The DA saying the victim consented is a problem because unless you’re a minor or otherwise incapacitated (more on this below), consent is always a defense to sexual activity no matter how gross it is (like in the Diddy trial). So here, Jane Doe’s lawyer needs to argue that her previous statement or the DA’s interpretation thereof was wrong, which will be difficult. The better approach is to argue that Jane Doe was incapable of giving consent because she was in a k-hole or otherwise under the influence of alcohol and ketamine. Ketamine is a tranquilizer and dissociative after all. The defense, of course, will argue that this is regret, not rape, and a money grab. That’s what they always do. Based on the very limited evidence that has been made public so far, including the civil complaint, Snapchat screenshot, and DA summary of Jane Doe’s statement, I do not think the grand jury indicts, and I do not think we see criminal charges in this case. In fact, I think the DA is presenting the case to the grand jury so they return a no bill and give him political cover for not prosecuting the case. Think Nolan Wells and how the pressure subsided when the grand jury didn’t indict. With respect to the civil case, I think Cornell has a number of substantive defenses regarding foreseeability, superseding criminal acts, and comparative negligence, but I still think they settle this case quickly, confidentially, and for good money to make the public relations nightmare go away. It’s no secret that drug and alcohol use is rampant at fraternities and sororities, and sexual assault is a huge problem at universities. The last thing Cornell wants is discovery into the steps it takes to protect young women on campus and for talking heads like me to open cable news shows discussing the allegations that one of their former students was gang raped. Once the deep-pocket university settles, the remaining individual and entity defendants will resolve as well. If this is TLDR, I spoke to CNN about the legal strategy in the case by Jane Doe’s lawyer, the defense, and the prosecution.
3:55

The Cornell 7 case is getting a lot of attention on social media. Before I dive in, I want to make clear that I wasn’t there. I don’t know what happened. But I will say that posting “free pussy” in a group chat and having group sex with an inebriated girl is disgusting even if she did consent. Here are my early thoughts on what will happen with the case: I’m a former prosecutor who now represents victims, including filing civil lawsuits on behalf of rape victims. I believe them, and I understand the psychology of sexual assault and why such a small percentage of perpetrators are ever brought to justice. But when a District Attorney issues a public and detailed statement explaining why your own client’s statement shows she consented to the sexual activity, that’s bad for your case. Now why the DA would take a dump on a civil lawsuit to defend his office is a different question altogether, but maybe he felt there was too much pressure not to explain why he didn’t file charges. The DA saying the victim consented is a problem because unless you’re a minor or otherwise incapacitated (more on this below), consent is always a defense to sexual activity no matter how gross it is (like in the Diddy trial). So here, Jane Doe’s lawyer needs to argue that her previous statement or the DA’s interpretation thereof was wrong, which will be difficult. The better approach is to argue that Jane Doe was incapable of giving consent because she was in a k-hole or otherwise under the influence of alcohol and ketamine. Ketamine is a tranquilizer and dissociative after all. The defense, of course, will argue that this is regret, not rape, and a money grab. That’s what they always do. Based on the very limited evidence that has been made public so far, including the civil complaint, Snapchat screenshot, and DA summary of Jane Doe’s statement, I do not think the grand jury indicts, and I do not think we see criminal charges in this case. In fact, I think the DA is presenting the case to the grand jury so they return a no bill and give him political cover for not prosecuting the case. Think Nolan Wells and how the pressure subsided when the grand jury didn’t indict. With respect to the civil case, I think Cornell has a number of substantive defenses regarding foreseeability, superseding criminal acts, and comparative negligence, but I still think they settle this case quickly, confidentially, and for good money to make the public relations nightmare go away. It’s no secret that drug and alcohol use is rampant at fraternities and sororities, and sexual assault is a huge problem at universities. The last thing Cornell wants is discovery into the steps it takes to protect young women on campus and for talking heads like me to open cable news shows discussing the allegations that one of their former students was gang raped. Once the deep-pocket university settles, the remaining individual and entity defendants will resolve as well. If this is TLDR, I spoke to CNN about the legal strategy in the case by Jane Doe’s lawyer, the defense, and the prosecution.

Neama Rahmani

157,570 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

There's a TON of information swirling on social media today about the now-infamous "Cornell 7" case, and it's enough to make anyone's head spin. What's different between the November 2024 police statement provided by Jane Doe, and the 2026 lawsuit filed in civil court against Cornell University, and why did the DA decline to pursue charges against these 7 fraternity brothers at the time? UNBIASED Politics, an attorney & host of the Unbiased Politics podcast, gives a comprehensive overview 👇 ****For context - this episode was recorded before additional information came out this morning about Jane Doe's police interview. For more legal breakdown on the story check out Jordan's podcast Unbiased Politics!**
6:35

There's a TON of information swirling on social media today about the now-infamous "Cornell 7" case, and it's enough to make anyone's head spin. What's different between the November 2024 police statement provided by Jane Doe, and the 2026 lawsuit filed in civil court against Cornell University, and why did the DA decline to pursue charges against these 7 fraternity brothers at the time? UNBIASED Politics, an attorney & host of the Unbiased Politics podcast, gives a comprehensive overview 👇 ****For context - this episode was recorded before additional information came out this morning about Jane Doe's police interview. For more legal breakdown on the story check out Jordan's podcast Unbiased Politics!**

Isabel Brown

38,859 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

Ethan Klein and Kaceytron have settled, and mediation has ended. I am assuming that part of the settlement was to give this public statement. It also looks as if Kaceytron will be moving on from this, and it's appropriate to do the same in coverage (but that is my opinion strictly) This could also affect Denims and Frogan's case. Also, this is telling that the Socialist Grifter, Hasan China Piker didn't reach out for support at all.
1:39

Ethan Klein and Kaceytron have settled, and mediation has ended. I am assuming that part of the settlement was to give this public statement. It also looks as if Kaceytron will be moving on from this, and it's appropriate to do the same in coverage (but that is my opinion strictly) This could also affect Denims and Frogan's case. Also, this is telling that the Socialist Grifter, Hasan China Piker didn't reach out for support at all.

Leigha Sapienti

92,569 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Final piece of evidence connects Lucy Craig via her hometown to a lawyer on Jane Doe's lawsuit, supporting the theory that she is Cornell's Jane Doe, my thoughts that this is a cynical play for money and fame, and, critically, that Jane Doe is a rapist and should be exposed We cannot confirm beyond a doubt, but in this video i go into evidence connecting Doe to Craig and recount Cornell fraternity members alleging it is Craig Worth noting, her enrollment date and age in August of 2022 don't align with Lucy's HS graduation year or her birthday, but her bday does align with her age at the time of this ordeal In other words, it's super unlikely it is someone else, and, if it is, that means that for two years Jane Doe has known that Lucy Craig was being identified as this girl and is still letting it go on to this day instead of trying to clear the air Suppose that Craig isn't Doe, that would mean that Craig likely left the university because Doe didn't clear these rumors However, sororities don't let this stuff go, if one sorority sister was falsely accused of this stuff then the others would ensure that the truth gets out instead of losing two sisters So, all things considered, I personally think it's likely Craig is Doe, but we can't know definitively unless someone comes forward. But we know that Craig is tied to both Birmingham and NYC with her lawyers and matches the other characteristics, all available on her public instagram, which I think indicates that she wants the attention
40:14

Final piece of evidence connects Lucy Craig via her hometown to a lawyer on Jane Doe's lawsuit, supporting the theory that she is Cornell's Jane Doe, my thoughts that this is a cynical play for money and fame, and, critically, that Jane Doe is a rapist and should be exposed We cannot confirm beyond a doubt, but in this video i go into evidence connecting Doe to Craig and recount Cornell fraternity members alleging it is Craig Worth noting, her enrollment date and age in August of 2022 don't align with Lucy's HS graduation year or her birthday, but her bday does align with her age at the time of this ordeal In other words, it's super unlikely it is someone else, and, if it is, that means that for two years Jane Doe has known that Lucy Craig was being identified as this girl and is still letting it go on to this day instead of trying to clear the air Suppose that Craig isn't Doe, that would mean that Craig likely left the university because Doe didn't clear these rumors However, sororities don't let this stuff go, if one sorority sister was falsely accused of this stuff then the others would ensure that the truth gets out instead of losing two sisters So, all things considered, I personally think it's likely Craig is Doe, but we can't know definitively unless someone comes forward. But we know that Craig is tied to both Birmingham and NYC with her lawyers and matches the other characteristics, all available on her public instagram, which I think indicates that she wants the attention

Aidan

37,871 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

My name is Dr Chris Day. I have been fighting an NHS whistleblowing case for the last 10 years and the case is still showing no signs of being over. The London South Employment Tribunal have allowed the NHS to turn what should have been a straightforward whistleblowing case, lodged by a doctor in 2015 into a circus that is still ongoing in 2025. These antics have cost the taxpayer over a million pounds and prevented serious patient safety issues being dealt with and has also damaged other doctors' legal whistleblowing protection. The way this case has been handled has not been done in private, large numbers of NHS staff and patients have read the papers and attended my hearings At the Royal Society of Medicine, I attempted in 15 minutes to explain my 10 year jungle of a whistleblowing case which you can see clip of on the below video (full talk here). The video starts with me explaining the patient safety issues and avoidable deaths that started all this in 2014. It ends with the crazy position we have ended up at.. Help us hold these people to account on Crowdjustice click below
12:07

My name is Dr Chris Day. I have been fighting an NHS whistleblowing case for the last 10 years and the case is still showing no signs of being over. The London South Employment Tribunal have allowed the NHS to turn what should have been a straightforward whistleblowing case, lodged by a doctor in 2015 into a circus that is still ongoing in 2025. These antics have cost the taxpayer over a million pounds and prevented serious patient safety issues being dealt with and has also damaged other doctors' legal whistleblowing protection. The way this case has been handled has not been done in private, large numbers of NHS staff and patients have read the papers and attended my hearings At the Royal Society of Medicine, I attempted in 15 minutes to explain my 10 year jungle of a whistleblowing case which you can see clip of on the below video (full talk here). The video starts with me explaining the patient safety issues and avoidable deaths that started all this in 2014. It ends with the crazy position we have ended up at.. Help us hold these people to account on Crowdjustice click below

Dr Chris Day

16,398 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

New “bombshell” in the Cornell case? Jane Doe telling police she was “100% confident” she was raped tells us what she believed. It does not establish that a rape occurred. And is that really surprising? Would someone report a rape to police if they didn’t believe they had been raped? The more important question is whether the full interview transcript contains material facts about consent, force, or incapacity that were missing from the six-page sworn statement the DA reviewed. Doe was given the opportunity to review and correct that statement before signing it under penalty of perjury. This video has a great back-and-forth on this “new development.” I can’t vouch for every assertion made, but it’s a great example of why we should question how information is being framed rather than treating a headline as fact.
2:31

New “bombshell” in the Cornell case? Jane Doe telling police she was “100% confident” she was raped tells us what she believed. It does not establish that a rape occurred. And is that really surprising? Would someone report a rape to police if they didn’t believe they had been raped? The more important question is whether the full interview transcript contains material facts about consent, force, or incapacity that were missing from the six-page sworn statement the DA reviewed. Doe was given the opportunity to review and correct that statement before signing it under penalty of perjury. This video has a great back-and-forth on this “new development.” I can’t vouch for every assertion made, but it’s a great example of why we should question how information is being framed rather than treating a headline as fact.

Bridget Ayers

111,440 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

NIGERIANS, THIS TINUBU CHICAGO CASE JUST TOOK A NEW TURN. 👀 Take your mind off the FBI filing for a moment. Focus on this VIDEO evidence. What makes this video particularly interesting is who is speaking. Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C. has just released another update on the Tinubu Chicago case. But unlike everything we’ve seen so far… This one isn’t a court document - it’s a video. Recorded at an APC political event in Nigeria. With President Tinubu present. And in that video, a man identified as Adewale Tinubu - reportedly President Tinubu’s nephew - publicly discusses the Chicago case. Now listen carefully to what he says. He reportedly states: “I did that case in Chicago. It was one of my first legal matters.” He then describes personally urging President Tinubu to settle the case. Interesting, right? But here is where things get VERY interesting. The official court record for that Chicago case identifies Patrick S. Coffey, Esq. as the attorney representing Tinubu. Not Adewale Tinubu. There is no court appearance under Adewale Tinubu’s name. No pleading bearing his name. No signature. No filing identifying him as counsel. At least, not in the official court record identified in this filing. So we have a very simple question: Why does a man publicly describe himself as having “done” the Chicago case when the official court record does not identify him as Tinubu’s attorney in that proceeding? There may be an explanation. Perhaps he was involved in some capacity that did not require appearing as counsel of record. Perhaps “I did that case” was being used loosely. Or perhaps there is something else we don’t yet know. That is precisely why this needs to be clarified. And this matters because of what is happening in the FBI FOIA case. Remember the last post I made on this case? Von Batten argued that Tinubu’s privacy position is weakened by the fact that the Nigerian Presidency itself publicly discussed the FBI records and the court case. Now there is another piece of public material. A VIDEO. At an APC political event. With Tinubu present. And his own reported nephew publicly discussing the Chicago case. So the question of privacy becomes even more interesting. Tinubu is asking a US federal court to protect records as private. Yet people within his own political and family circle are publicly discussing matters connected to the case. Can you claim something is private in court while people close to you are publicly discussing it? That is now an issue the court can potentially consider. And Von Batten is not simply posting the video on social media. He is seeking to put the video transcript before the court as part of his supplemental evidentiary exhibits. If the court accepts the filing, the judge will have before her: ➡️ The FBI’s confirmation of 399 pages of responsive records ➡️ Investigative material involving surveillance, undercover operations, cooperating witnesses and other matters ➡️ Wiretap recordings the FBI says were compiled during an investigation involving heroin-trafficking crimes ➡️ Von Batten’s argument concerning the Nigerian Presidency’s public statement ➡️ And now, a video in which Tinubu’s reported nephew publicly discusses the Chicago case Think about that. This case has moved from: “What does the FBI have?” to: “What does the FBI have - and what have people connected to Tinubu publicly said about it?” And there is one question I really want answered: If Adewale Tinubu was involved in that Chicago case, in what capacity was he involved? Because the official court record identified in the filing does not show him as counsel of record. That discrepancy deserves an explanation. And if the video is being presented to a US federal court as evidence, the court can decide what weight, if any, to give it. We don’t need to speculate. We need to look at the documents. Watch the video. Read the transcript. Check the court record. And ask the questions. We deserve the truth.
0:32

NIGERIANS, THIS TINUBU CHICAGO CASE JUST TOOK A NEW TURN. 👀 Take your mind off the FBI filing for a moment. Focus on this VIDEO evidence. What makes this video particularly interesting is who is speaking. Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C. has just released another update on the Tinubu Chicago case. But unlike everything we’ve seen so far… This one isn’t a court document - it’s a video. Recorded at an APC political event in Nigeria. With President Tinubu present. And in that video, a man identified as Adewale Tinubu - reportedly President Tinubu’s nephew - publicly discusses the Chicago case. Now listen carefully to what he says. He reportedly states: “I did that case in Chicago. It was one of my first legal matters.” He then describes personally urging President Tinubu to settle the case. Interesting, right? But here is where things get VERY interesting. The official court record for that Chicago case identifies Patrick S. Coffey, Esq. as the attorney representing Tinubu. Not Adewale Tinubu. There is no court appearance under Adewale Tinubu’s name. No pleading bearing his name. No signature. No filing identifying him as counsel. At least, not in the official court record identified in this filing. So we have a very simple question: Why does a man publicly describe himself as having “done” the Chicago case when the official court record does not identify him as Tinubu’s attorney in that proceeding? There may be an explanation. Perhaps he was involved in some capacity that did not require appearing as counsel of record. Perhaps “I did that case” was being used loosely. Or perhaps there is something else we don’t yet know. That is precisely why this needs to be clarified. And this matters because of what is happening in the FBI FOIA case. Remember the last post I made on this case? Von Batten argued that Tinubu’s privacy position is weakened by the fact that the Nigerian Presidency itself publicly discussed the FBI records and the court case. Now there is another piece of public material. A VIDEO. At an APC political event. With Tinubu present. And his own reported nephew publicly discussing the Chicago case. So the question of privacy becomes even more interesting. Tinubu is asking a US federal court to protect records as private. Yet people within his own political and family circle are publicly discussing matters connected to the case. Can you claim something is private in court while people close to you are publicly discussing it? That is now an issue the court can potentially consider. And Von Batten is not simply posting the video on social media. He is seeking to put the video transcript before the court as part of his supplemental evidentiary exhibits. If the court accepts the filing, the judge will have before her: ➡️ The FBI’s confirmation of 399 pages of responsive records ➡️ Investigative material involving surveillance, undercover operations, cooperating witnesses and other matters ➡️ Wiretap recordings the FBI says were compiled during an investigation involving heroin-trafficking crimes ➡️ Von Batten’s argument concerning the Nigerian Presidency’s public statement ➡️ And now, a video in which Tinubu’s reported nephew publicly discusses the Chicago case Think about that. This case has moved from: “What does the FBI have?” to: “What does the FBI have - and what have people connected to Tinubu publicly said about it?” And there is one question I really want answered: If Adewale Tinubu was involved in that Chicago case, in what capacity was he involved? Because the official court record identified in the filing does not show him as counsel of record. That discrepancy deserves an explanation. And if the video is being presented to a US federal court as evidence, the court can decide what weight, if any, to give it. We don’t need to speculate. We need to look at the documents. Watch the video. Read the transcript. Check the court record. And ask the questions. We deserve the truth.

Oluwakemi Oyefeso

74,252 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

Breaking: New York prosecutors are reopening the investigation into the gang rape at a Cornell University fraternity in 2024. A lawsuit from the victim reveals she was drugged and raped by 7 fraternity members of Chi Phi and includes evidence from a group chat in which one of the perpetrators wrote: "Free Pussy upstairs.” The lawsuit also reveals Cornell University turned a blind eye to the gang rape by only expelling 2 of the accused perpetrators while allowing the remaining 5 to write essays to avoid discipline. This is the same Cornell University that suspended 4 students for protesting against Israel’s genocide so according to this “higher institution” drugging and raping women is ok, but protesting genocide is not. It also shows what a backwards country we live in when a so-called Ivy League college thinks writing an essay is an appropriate response to rape instead of handcuffs and prison. Finally, while it is welcomed news that prosecutors are presenting the case to a grand jury it should not take the victim having to file a lawsuit and widespread public backlash for prosecutors to do their jobs. Video Source: ABC News
1:47

Breaking: New York prosecutors are reopening the investigation into the gang rape at a Cornell University fraternity in 2024. A lawsuit from the victim reveals she was drugged and raped by 7 fraternity members of Chi Phi and includes evidence from a group chat in which one of the perpetrators wrote: "Free Pussy upstairs.” The lawsuit also reveals Cornell University turned a blind eye to the gang rape by only expelling 2 of the accused perpetrators while allowing the remaining 5 to write essays to avoid discipline. This is the same Cornell University that suspended 4 students for protesting against Israel’s genocide so according to this “higher institution” drugging and raping women is ok, but protesting genocide is not. It also shows what a backwards country we live in when a so-called Ivy League college thinks writing an essay is an appropriate response to rape instead of handcuffs and prison. Finally, while it is welcomed news that prosecutors are presenting the case to a grand jury it should not take the victim having to file a lawsuit and widespread public backlash for prosecutors to do their jobs. Video Source: ABC News

Power to the People ☭🕊

88,323 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

In light of the names Anneke Lucas mentioned, like the former Canadian prime minister who is dead now, but is the father of the current one. It is being shared all over the internet now. Canadian accounts are posting this, and it is getting lots of attention. This is also a wake-up call for Canada. A lot of people in Canada are commenting on social media that they are shocked by this guy being named. But actually he was already mentioned by Cathy O'Brien in 1995, as being involved in these networks! See the video below. So there is corroboration between these witnesses. A lot of these former and now deceased prime ministers she mentions were, at that time that she was in it in the 70s, involved in this. Also the Belgian one that Anneke names, and was also named by other witnesses. Which tells us, like these witnesses say, this was a global network. So the truth was already out there a bit, but it is coming out more for a bigger public. We will have more revelations coming out in 2025 about these dark dealing that have been going on at the highest levels, I'm sure. This is going to be a shock for a lot of people that are new to this information, because it is reaching a bigger public. Some will choose not to believe it, do no research, and look no further. But a lot more people will wake up to this, it is unstoppable. Of course, we have to check in with our own vibration. If it gets too heavy, take some time out and go for a walk in nature. Whilst revelations are important for the truth to come out, and confronting hard information is part of that, we have to check with our selves how this information is affecting us, and sometimes we need a time off. It is always most important to maintain a healthy balance between checking in with this information and our own peace of mind. #Epstein #PBDpodcast
1:42

In light of the names Anneke Lucas mentioned, like the former Canadian prime minister who is dead now, but is the father of the current one. It is being shared all over the internet now. Canadian accounts are posting this, and it is getting lots of attention. This is also a wake-up call for Canada. A lot of people in Canada are commenting on social media that they are shocked by this guy being named. But actually he was already mentioned by Cathy O'Brien in 1995, as being involved in these networks! See the video below. So there is corroboration between these witnesses. A lot of these former and now deceased prime ministers she mentions were, at that time that she was in it in the 70s, involved in this. Also the Belgian one that Anneke names, and was also named by other witnesses. Which tells us, like these witnesses say, this was a global network. So the truth was already out there a bit, but it is coming out more for a bigger public. We will have more revelations coming out in 2025 about these dark dealing that have been going on at the highest levels, I'm sure. This is going to be a shock for a lot of people that are new to this information, because it is reaching a bigger public. Some will choose not to believe it, do no research, and look no further. But a lot more people will wake up to this, it is unstoppable. Of course, we have to check in with our own vibration. If it gets too heavy, take some time out and go for a walk in nature. Whilst revelations are important for the truth to come out, and confronting hard information is part of that, we have to check with our selves how this information is affecting us, and sometimes we need a time off. It is always most important to maintain a healthy balance between checking in with this information and our own peace of mind. #Epstein #PBDpodcast

Jens Patteeuw

20,426 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Andrew Tate - Uncovering the Truth The case against Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate has received significant media attention and has raised important questions about the role of prosecutors and the criminal justice system in cases of this nature. Many people have expressed concern that the case against the brothers is based on weak evidence and may be politically motivated. Some have even gone as far as to suggest that the case is an attempt to silence the brothers. The investigation began 1 year ago, and they have been in preventative detention for 4 months ago. Despite the passage of time, the prosecutor has failed to file charges against them, and the case remains unresolved. The brothers have vehemently denied the allegations against them and have consistently maintained their innocence. Despite the challenges they have faced, the brothers have remained resilient and have continued to fight for their rights and their freedom. Throughout the investigation, the prosecutor has used various underhanded tactics, including leaking snippets of information from the case, private communications with family and attorneys, and other such tactics to build a case against the brothers. However, despite these efforts, the prosecutor has been unable to create a substantial case file. The reason for this is that the allegations made against the brothers are weak, lacking merit and substance. The allegations made by the women contain numerous inconsistencies and lack evidence, and the women themselves are not credible witnesses. CCTV footage and leaked messages have demonstrated that the women had complete freedom of movement, both physically and psychologically, which suggests that no human trafficking occurred. The CCTV footage clearly shows that the women were free to leave and return to the house without any interference from the brothers, indicating physical freedom of movement. Additionally, leaked messages suggest that the women had access to people outside of Romania, they had their passports, and they used Uber regularly, which shows that they had psychological freedom. Regarding the alleged offense of rape, at least three witnesses have categorically stated that it was consensual. There is no other evidence, and the woman who made the claim did so weeks after leaving Romania, which further weakens her case. Several alleged victims have publicly stated that they are not victims, but the prosecutor has ignored their claims and included them as victims. This suggests that the prosecutor is unwilling to accept evidence that contradicts their narrative, which is concerning. The claim made against the brothers was that they brainwashed the women, but the psychiatrist never spoke to the women in question to make such a determination. Instead, the psychiatrist relied on the word of two women from the UK and US to make the determination, which is a biased and flawed process. The prosecutor attempted to bolster the claim despite the lack of evidence, indicating that the case against the brothers is paper-thin. It is unclear when the case against the brothers will be resolved, but one thing is certain: the outcome will have significant implications for the criminal justice system in Romania and beyond. Many are watching this case closely, and the world is waiting to see what will happen next. The brothers continue to maintain their innocence and to fight for their rights. They have vowed to clear their names and to expose the injustices that have been perpetrated against them. Initially, many believed that the brothers were guilty of the allegations against them, but upon closer examination of the evidence, leaks, and reporting, it is clear that the case against them is weak. It is important to ensure that justice is served. This case has highlighted the importance of due process and fair trials, and it has reminded us that everyone, regardless of their status or reputation, is entitled to a fair hearing and a fair trial.
0:36

Andrew Tate - Uncovering the Truth The case against Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate has received significant media attention and has raised important questions about the role of prosecutors and the criminal justice system in cases of this nature. Many people have expressed concern that the case against the brothers is based on weak evidence and may be politically motivated. Some have even gone as far as to suggest that the case is an attempt to silence the brothers. The investigation began 1 year ago, and they have been in preventative detention for 4 months ago. Despite the passage of time, the prosecutor has failed to file charges against them, and the case remains unresolved. The brothers have vehemently denied the allegations against them and have consistently maintained their innocence. Despite the challenges they have faced, the brothers have remained resilient and have continued to fight for their rights and their freedom. Throughout the investigation, the prosecutor has used various underhanded tactics, including leaking snippets of information from the case, private communications with family and attorneys, and other such tactics to build a case against the brothers. However, despite these efforts, the prosecutor has been unable to create a substantial case file. The reason for this is that the allegations made against the brothers are weak, lacking merit and substance. The allegations made by the women contain numerous inconsistencies and lack evidence, and the women themselves are not credible witnesses. CCTV footage and leaked messages have demonstrated that the women had complete freedom of movement, both physically and psychologically, which suggests that no human trafficking occurred. The CCTV footage clearly shows that the women were free to leave and return to the house without any interference from the brothers, indicating physical freedom of movement. Additionally, leaked messages suggest that the women had access to people outside of Romania, they had their passports, and they used Uber regularly, which shows that they had psychological freedom. Regarding the alleged offense of rape, at least three witnesses have categorically stated that it was consensual. There is no other evidence, and the woman who made the claim did so weeks after leaving Romania, which further weakens her case. Several alleged victims have publicly stated that they are not victims, but the prosecutor has ignored their claims and included them as victims. This suggests that the prosecutor is unwilling to accept evidence that contradicts their narrative, which is concerning. The claim made against the brothers was that they brainwashed the women, but the psychiatrist never spoke to the women in question to make such a determination. Instead, the psychiatrist relied on the word of two women from the UK and US to make the determination, which is a biased and flawed process. The prosecutor attempted to bolster the claim despite the lack of evidence, indicating that the case against the brothers is paper-thin. It is unclear when the case against the brothers will be resolved, but one thing is certain: the outcome will have significant implications for the criminal justice system in Romania and beyond. Many are watching this case closely, and the world is waiting to see what will happen next. The brothers continue to maintain their innocence and to fight for their rights. They have vowed to clear their names and to expose the injustices that have been perpetrated against them. Initially, many believed that the brothers were guilty of the allegations against them, but upon closer examination of the evidence, leaks, and reporting, it is clear that the case against them is weak. It is important to ensure that justice is served. This case has highlighted the importance of due process and fair trials, and it has reminded us that everyone, regardless of their status or reputation, is entitled to a fair hearing and a fair trial.

Mario Nawfal

3,646,145 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Gov. Kathy Hochul: Last night, I signed an executive order appointing Attorney General Letitia James as special prosecutor in the sexual assault case at Cornell University. After this young woman came forward, she spoke to the police and told them exactly what happened. She could not have been clearer that she was 100% confident that she had been raped. Shockingly, those words never made it into the account that the Cornell police sent to prosecutors. She was failed by people and institutions with an obligation to protect her.
2:17

Gov. Kathy Hochul: Last night, I signed an executive order appointing Attorney General Letitia James as special prosecutor in the sexual assault case at Cornell University. After this young woman came forward, she spoke to the police and told them exactly what happened. She could not have been clearer that she was 100% confident that she had been raped. Shockingly, those words never made it into the account that the Cornell police sent to prosecutors. She was failed by people and institutions with an obligation to protect her.

Headquarters

87,959 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Speculation that the Holiday Inn Express hotel in Rhoose will be used to house Afghans is deeply concerning. I've been contacted by several constituents about this, who are understandably and legitimately concerned. There have also been several reports on social media. As an elected member representing the area, authorities have told me nothing about this. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no public statement issued by the Ministry of Defence. This is unacceptable. Speculation has been ongoing for several days, and an information vacuum has inevitably developed. I therefore wanted to take the opportunity to explain the actions I have undertaken to address this. I have written to the MOD asking them to clarify the situation urgently. To clarify my position, if speculation is correct, I would strongly and categorically oppose the hotel being used for suggested purpose. It is not suitable to provide accomodation of this nature. The hotel was built to provide accomodation for airport passengers. As a result, the vast majority of guests would, in practice, stay at the hotel for a maximum of one night, either before or after their flight. As such, they would not access local NHS services, schools or other public services. This would not be the case if the hotel is used in the manner suggested. By contrast, it would put huge pressure on local amenities and other public services. It is also situated close to a new college that is set to open. If the reports are true, then the plans would have been developed without any consultation with residents. This too would be unacceptable. They should be afforded the opportunity to provide feedback, have their say and raise any concerns they may have. When I receive further updates, I will update residents accordingly. Be assured I will always put the local community first.
1:12

Speculation that the Holiday Inn Express hotel in Rhoose will be used to house Afghans is deeply concerning. I've been contacted by several constituents about this, who are understandably and legitimately concerned. There have also been several reports on social media. As an elected member representing the area, authorities have told me nothing about this. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no public statement issued by the Ministry of Defence. This is unacceptable. Speculation has been ongoing for several days, and an information vacuum has inevitably developed. I therefore wanted to take the opportunity to explain the actions I have undertaken to address this. I have written to the MOD asking them to clarify the situation urgently. To clarify my position, if speculation is correct, I would strongly and categorically oppose the hotel being used for suggested purpose. It is not suitable to provide accomodation of this nature. The hotel was built to provide accomodation for airport passengers. As a result, the vast majority of guests would, in practice, stay at the hotel for a maximum of one night, either before or after their flight. As such, they would not access local NHS services, schools or other public services. This would not be the case if the hotel is used in the manner suggested. By contrast, it would put huge pressure on local amenities and other public services. It is also situated close to a new college that is set to open. If the reports are true, then the plans would have been developed without any consultation with residents. This too would be unacceptable. They should be afforded the opportunity to provide feedback, have their say and raise any concerns they may have. When I receive further updates, I will update residents accordingly. Be assured I will always put the local community first.

Andrew RT Davies

13,694 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨COURT OF APPEAL AMSTERDAM LIVE UPDATE🚨 Stassen (Dutch Lawyer) has not held back in Amsterdam Court of Appeal this morning, in the preliminary evidence appeal hearing in the case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and the Dutch state et al. (explainer video linked below). Peter Stassen told the High Court Justices (of which there are 4) that "Bill gates (a defendant in this case) is part of an elite network who share a 'satanic ideology'." He has directly accused the Dutch state of lying, and stated that the Judiciary is being misled, and while "no one is being prosecuted for the Epstein files - as they 'stick to a mafia type silencing code' - they continue to blame the victims (plaintiffs/claimants) in this case (the covid 'vaccine' injured and bereaved) as the dangerous ones, the liars." Lawyer for the Plaintiffs Peter Stassen states "give me the facts and I will give you the law." He states to the court: "it is important that you take into account alternative facts or you will never get the truth; we are experiencing the greatest crime against humanity and the defendants in this case are the perpetrators of that crime." More to follow. Links below for info. I promise I will follow and report on this case and share everything you need to know! Fiona Rose Diamond #COVIDJustice #Netherlands
4:39

🚨COURT OF APPEAL AMSTERDAM LIVE UPDATE🚨 Stassen (Dutch Lawyer) has not held back in Amsterdam Court of Appeal this morning, in the preliminary evidence appeal hearing in the case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and the Dutch state et al. (explainer video linked below). Peter Stassen told the High Court Justices (of which there are 4) that "Bill gates (a defendant in this case) is part of an elite network who share a 'satanic ideology'." He has directly accused the Dutch state of lying, and stated that the Judiciary is being misled, and while "no one is being prosecuted for the Epstein files - as they 'stick to a mafia type silencing code' - they continue to blame the victims (plaintiffs/claimants) in this case (the covid 'vaccine' injured and bereaved) as the dangerous ones, the liars." Lawyer for the Plaintiffs Peter Stassen states "give me the facts and I will give you the law." He states to the court: "it is important that you take into account alternative facts or you will never get the truth; we are experiencing the greatest crime against humanity and the defendants in this case are the perpetrators of that crime." More to follow. Links below for info. I promise I will follow and report on this case and share everything you need to know! Fiona Rose Diamond #COVIDJustice #Netherlands

Paul White Gold Eagle

28,159 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi | On NEET (UG) 2026 paper leak case, Tanvi Dubey, Advocate representing Federation of All India Medical Association’s plea, says, “Today was an important hearing of NEET because NTA and the chairperson of the committees filed their affidavits. Supreme Court conducted a detailed hearing… The Supreme Court questioned the Chairman as to which areas are yet to comply. The SC also gave an important observation that accountability is important, as systemic failures are a result of a lack of accountability. The Solicitor General also gave the statement that the case is being monitored by PM Modi… The court has kept this matter pending as they want to observe the matter… The next hearing has been scheduled in July…”
2:05

#WATCH | Delhi | On NEET (UG) 2026 paper leak case, Tanvi Dubey, Advocate representing Federation of All India Medical Association’s plea, says, “Today was an important hearing of NEET because NTA and the chairperson of the committees filed their affidavits. Supreme Court conducted a detailed hearing… The Supreme Court questioned the Chairman as to which areas are yet to comply. The SC also gave an important observation that accountability is important, as systemic failures are a result of a lack of accountability. The Solicitor General also gave the statement that the case is being monitored by PM Modi… The court has kept this matter pending as they want to observe the matter… The next hearing has been scheduled in July…”

ANI

14,644 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Sunny Hostin now walks back her previous defense of the Cornell 7. She says that if this was in D.C. when she was still a federal prosecutor she would take the case, and blames New York's intoxication law for it not being tackled sooner: "I always look at this as a former sex crimes prosecutor. In D.C. this case would have gone to trial. I would have prosecuted this case like I prosecuted a lot of sex crimes. The problem is the New York law. And this is a morally repugnant case. It is grotesque when you read the details, Ana, you are right. I feel terrible about how this happened, why do these kids -- why do they have ketamine? Why are they -- why is there no upstanding -- an upstander. You know, you want that. The young man to go upstairs and say, 'shut this down. What is going on?' You want more people to do that. But New York makes it incredibly impossible to prosecute a case like this. You would have to be unconscious or involuntarily drugged like slipped a drug in order to charge this case and that is why it wasn't charged in 2024. And I will tell you there are 19 other states that have this same law. 19 other states."
1:09

Sunny Hostin now walks back her previous defense of the Cornell 7. She says that if this was in D.C. when she was still a federal prosecutor she would take the case, and blames New York's intoxication law for it not being tackled sooner: "I always look at this as a former sex crimes prosecutor. In D.C. this case would have gone to trial. I would have prosecuted this case like I prosecuted a lot of sex crimes. The problem is the New York law. And this is a morally repugnant case. It is grotesque when you read the details, Ana, you are right. I feel terrible about how this happened, why do these kids -- why do they have ketamine? Why are they -- why is there no upstanding -- an upstander. You know, you want that. The young man to go upstairs and say, 'shut this down. What is going on?' You want more people to do that. But New York makes it incredibly impossible to prosecute a case like this. You would have to be unconscious or involuntarily drugged like slipped a drug in order to charge this case and that is why it wasn't charged in 2024. And I will tell you there are 19 other states that have this same law. 19 other states."

Nicholas Fondacaro

141,639 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce