Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Cosmetic and surgical interventions cannot alter human genetics or biological sex. Performing irreversible, life-altering surgeries under the banner of healthcare raises fundamental ethical questions about long-term physical outcomes. Biological sex remains immutable. No amount of surgical procedure can transform a biological male into a female, or vice versa. Labeling... show more

HerTribeVibe

3,968 subscribers

16,849 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von JK

JKvor 2 Tagen

"Lady voice", MAN VOICE, "Lady voice", MAN VOICE. Fringe goes a long way back...

Profilbild von HerTribeVibe

HerTribeVibevor 2 Tagen

Male pattern baldness

Profilbild von PissheadPat

PissheadPatvor 2 Tagen

Trans is a cult

Profilbild von Schrödinger's Lesbian ⚢

Schrödinger's Lesbian ⚢vor 2 Tagen

Yes the genetics 🧬 that the surgeon is referring to is that you’re a man.

Profilbild von Don'tShoveTheLesbians🌞

Don'tShoveTheLesbians🌞vor 2 Tagen

"I'm a very open book, ignore the filters that lie to you." And no, it's not just a rare genetic condition that tries to close an extreme open wound, sir.

Profilbild von Molly Malarkey 🇺🇸

Molly Malarkey 🇺🇸vor 2 Tagen

Everything about this is so monstrous.

Profilbild von JTB

JTBvor 2 Tagen

It’s the surgeons, they need to be struck off , it’s no different to the things that have been done to Katie price , it’s criminal to change healthy body parts because of a mental body dysmorphia . Treat the illness !

Profilbild von HerTribeVibe

HerTribeVibevor 2 Tagen

I agree

Profilbild von Sharon Ball MIMS

Sharon Ball MIMSvor 2 Tagen

He didn't look hard enough. Plenty out there saying ow bad it is.

Profilbild von Devonshire Pixie 🇬🇧💙🇮🇱

Devonshire Pixie 🇬🇧💙🇮🇱vor 2 Tagen

Those filters are doing the heavy lifting 😆

Profilbild von TheTerfinator

TheTerfinatorvor 2 Tagen

It's a cult

Profilbild von Larkspur

Larkspurvor 2 Tagen

I heard that it is an everlasting infectious hole!

Profilbild von Sharon🚜🚜🚜🚜🚜

Sharon🚜🚜🚜🚜🚜vor 2 Tagen

An open wound is just that not a vagina

Profilbild von Jason Bourne The1st

Jason Bourne The1stvor 2 Tagen

The filters don’t hide the giant male skull and male pattern baldness.

Profilbild von Tracey Russell

Tracey Russellvor 2 Tagen

If you were meant to have a vagina, you would have been born with one, like a WOMAN.

Profilbild von Gerry Aubergine

Gerry Auberginevor 2 Tagen

Cosmetic surgery may change the appearance of a person, but it doesn't change their fundamental nature.

Profilbild von GenXreacts

GenXreactsvor 2 Tagen

TIMs and TIFs looking at one another.

Profilbild von Becca Begotten🏳️‍⚧️

Becca Begotten🏳️‍⚧️vor 2 Tagen

Hormones change biology to the other sex. Even to the point where it alters DNA messaging and the body starts making female blood protiens. Trans women are biologically and fully female.

Profilbild von Reggie Stratocaster

Reggie Stratocastervor 2 Tagen

It seems he had really bad surgery and there is no accountability for the surgeon who seemed aloof to his patients issues.This person may have temporarily dealt with this surgical complication but his problems with life may only be just beginning. This is gender affirming care.

Profilbild von Kerry Griffiths

Kerry Griffithsvor 2 Tagen

All that pain and suffering and time off work all because of autogynophilia.

Profilbild von Nicky Chaleunphone 🇺🇸

Nicky Chaleunphone 🇺🇸vor 2 Tagen

Don't worry, his mortician will see him in the near future

Profilbild von GoatOlive

GoatOlivevor 2 Tagen

The government is paying to support these sick men that they also mutilate. He probably got government benefits the whole time while actual women are out there slaving away in the workforce.

Profilbild von GloriaGlasspool

GloriaGlasspoolvor 2 Tagen

Where to start! He's clearly convincing himself that it was the right decision, although the cognitive dissonance is palpable. He was lied to all the way through. He is some mother's son 😢

Profilbild von Trishicut

Trishicutvor 2 Tagen

Crazy how a wound refuses to stay open.

Profilbild von Lana

Lanavor 2 Tagen

Unbelievable his job gave him a year off for this shit

Profilbild von Lydia Sweeting

Lydia Sweetingvor 2 Tagen

Oy. AGAIN with strangers practising medicine on people they've never met. Every major medical body calls this care. But do go on.

Profilbild von Adolf Hitler 2.0

Adolf Hitler 2.0vor 2 Tagen

He mutulated himself in the worst posible way. He was a (physical) healthy man now he has an open wound insted of genetalia. The wound this guy calls vagina will try to close as soon as possible. He cant even pie, no way back. He got jewed* gender is tallmud.

Profilbild von Wolf

Wolfvor 2 Tagen

Antes hacían un agujero en el suelo, se conocía como enterrar al muerto. Era una práctica más loable que todo lo que estamos escuchando

Profilbild von Kris Murray Browne 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇪🇺🇵🇸

Kris Murray Browne 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇪🇺🇵🇸vor 2 Tagen

You fuck with Mother Nature, Mother Nature will fuck with you

Profilbild von Trainswoman

Trainswomanvor 2 Tagen

they act like it’s their own personal womb and they’re having their periods and it’s biologically unique to them to suffer the growing pains of surgical intervention to invert your penis and leave a gaping wound that smells like shit. just like a woman’s period!

Profilbild von Jill 💙 🇺🇦

Jill 💙 🇺🇦vor 2 Tagen

”Genetics” was the cause of his problems according to his surgeon. Yes, because his genetics are male, his body is not supposed to support a man made cavity and will try to heal it. So, now he’s a man with a cavity which will need permanent care - so NOT a vagina.

Profilbild von Lady_Sapientia

Lady_Sapientiavor 2 Tagen

Your Dr. said that your problem was "genetics"? That you're actually a man and your body knows it's not supposed to have a gaping hole in the bottom of your torso besides your anus? You couldn't find anybody else who had those problems because it's a new fad? Interesting....

Profilbild von women matter

women mattervor 2 Tagen

Oh dear

Profilbild von PissheadPat

PissheadPatvor 2 Tagen

Fkin el

Profilbild von Kelcey

Kelceyvor 2 Tagen

If he thinks he has won the war with his body, buddy have I got news for you. This will be an ongoing problem for you sadly. Was it worth it?

Ähnliche Videos

Surgical removal of healthy breast tissue cannot alter human chromosomes or turn a biological woman into a man. Performing elective double mastectomies on healthy bodies is not healthcare—it is permanent, irreversible harm. Medical ethics must prioritize long-term safeguarding over affirming body dysmorphia. Healthy organs should never be surgically removed to conform to gender ideology. A double mastectomy does not change biological sex; it leaves young women with permanent physical scars and lifelong medical consequences. Real compassion means protecting women’s bodies from irreversible harm.

Surgical removal of healthy breast tissue cannot alter human chromosomes or turn a biological woman into a man. Performing elective double mastectomies on healthy bodies is not healthcare—it is permanent, irreversible harm. Medical ethics must prioritize long-term safeguarding over affirming body dysmorphia. Healthy organs should never be surgically removed to conform to gender ideology. A double mastectomy does not change biological sex; it leaves young women with permanent physical scars and lifelong medical consequences. Real compassion means protecting women’s bodies from irreversible harm.

HerTribeVibe

44,728 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

Biological sex is immutable. Saying so isn’t cruelty, bigotry or hatred. It’s a statement of material reality. Men are male. Women are female. Surgery, hormones and legal documents can alter appearance, physiology or social status, but they do not change biological sex. Science has no duty to flatter politics. Reality doesn’t take sides.

Biological sex is immutable. Saying so isn’t cruelty, bigotry or hatred. It’s a statement of material reality. Men are male. Women are female. Surgery, hormones and legal documents can alter appearance, physiology or social status, but they do not change biological sex. Science has no duty to flatter politics. Reality doesn’t take sides.

The Heartlands Tribune

10,800 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Eleven-year-olds do not have the developmental maturity to make life-altering medical decisions. Puberty is a vital biological phase for physical, bone, and brain development—not something to be paused or bypassed. Medicalizing childhood before a young person even reaches adulthood raises major safeguarding concerns. Children deserve the time to grow up and mature naturally without early medical interventions. Let kids be kids.

Eleven-year-olds do not have the developmental maturity to make life-altering medical decisions. Puberty is a vital biological phase for physical, bone, and brain development—not something to be paused or bypassed. Medicalizing childhood before a young person even reaches adulthood raises major safeguarding concerns. Children deserve the time to grow up and mature naturally without early medical interventions. Let kids be kids.

HerTribeVibe

59,947 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

A street interview from a UK Pride event featuring two biological males in silver costumes who identify as trans women and claim to be "cosmic angels" from the future. The open rejection of single-sex spaces, where an individual dismisses public boundaries and asserts an absolute right to use any public restroom regardless of biological reality or women's privacy. The complete collapse of shared civic boundaries.

A street interview from a UK Pride event featuring two biological males in silver costumes who identify as trans women and claim to be "cosmic angels" from the future. The open rejection of single-sex spaces, where an individual dismisses public boundaries and asserts an absolute right to use any public restroom regardless of biological reality or women's privacy. The complete collapse of shared civic boundaries.

HerTribeVibe

18,584 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A viral social media video detailing a family dynamic where a biological mother of four children transitions to identify as a trans man, changing the children's parental terms from "mom" to "dad." The total normalization of decoupling biological reality from foundational family structures, where the distinct and irreplaceable concept of motherhood is reclassified to accommodate personal identity updates.

A viral social media video detailing a family dynamic where a biological mother of four children transitions to identify as a trans man, changing the children's parental terms from "mom" to "dad." The total normalization of decoupling biological reality from foundational family structures, where the distinct and irreplaceable concept of motherhood is reclassified to accommodate personal identity updates.

HerTribeVibe

14,724 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 HISTORIC SETTLEMENT OVER TRANSGENDER PROCEDURES ON KIDS A clinic is accused of falsifying medical records and fraudulently billing Medicaid to push children into irreversible, life-altering procedures. They were lying to taxpayers and rushing kids through interventions many later regret. Now a settlement is offering real hope. Detransitioners who want to reverse course and return to their biological sex finally have a path back to the same clinic that started them down that road. Falsifying records. Stealing from taxpayers. Experimenting on children.

🚨 HISTORIC SETTLEMENT OVER TRANSGENDER PROCEDURES ON KIDS A clinic is accused of falsifying medical records and fraudulently billing Medicaid to push children into irreversible, life-altering procedures. They were lying to taxpayers and rushing kids through interventions many later regret. Now a settlement is offering real hope. Detransitioners who want to reverse course and return to their biological sex finally have a path back to the same clinic that started them down that road. Falsifying records. Stealing from taxpayers. Experimenting on children.

Gunther Eagleman™

22,295 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A video showing an older biological male dressed in a short pink skirt, a low-cut top, and pink sneakers, posing on a dirt path next to a passing cargo train. The adoption of hyper-feminized aesthetics by biological men, presenting an exaggerated performance of womanhood in everyday public settings. A surreal cultural paradigm.

A video showing an older biological male dressed in a short pink skirt, a low-cut top, and pink sneakers, posing on a dirt path next to a passing cargo train. The adoption of hyper-feminized aesthetics by biological men, presenting an exaggerated performance of womanhood in everyday public settings. A surreal cultural paradigm.

HerTribeVibe

24,279 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Albanese Labor Government, with the help of the Greens, and Senators Pocock and Tyrell, has just voted down my proposed legislation to acknowledge the biological reality of men and women and protect the rights of both sexes. They did so without allowing any debate and without proper regard for normal parliamentary process. Shameful, but as I warned this morning, not unexpected. The Greens talk about hatred, but now, through their words today, their hatred of biological women is on display for all to see. And shame on the Labor Party, because it has become a party too afraid to allow debate or acknowledge reality. If you cannot acknowledge reality, how can you govern a country? You can download and read the details of my common-sense proposal to acknowledge the biological reality in Australia's Sex Discrimination Act here:

The Albanese Labor Government, with the help of the Greens, and Senators Pocock and Tyrell, has just voted down my proposed legislation to acknowledge the biological reality of men and women and protect the rights of both sexes. They did so without allowing any debate and without proper regard for normal parliamentary process. Shameful, but as I warned this morning, not unexpected. The Greens talk about hatred, but now, through their words today, their hatred of biological women is on display for all to see. And shame on the Labor Party, because it has become a party too afraid to allow debate or acknowledge reality. If you cannot acknowledge reality, how can you govern a country? You can download and read the details of my common-sense proposal to acknowledge the biological reality in Australia's Sex Discrimination Act here:

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

124,881 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis believes there is virtually no limit to what AI can eventually achieve. "humans as biological information processing systems". He is working on the premise that the entire universe is "computable," meaning that anything that exists can technically be modeled by a machine. He says that a powerful enough computer—conceptually known as a Turing machine—should be able to simulate every aspect of reality. Until physics proves that something is impossible to calculate, he is operating on the belief that AI can solve any problem. This perspective even applies to the things that feel uniquely human. When asked about physical sensations, like feeling the warmth of a light or hearing background noise, Hassabis argued that these are just forms of information being processed by the brain. He views humans as biological information processing systems. By treating biology and reality essentially as data, he believes we will not only replicate human capabilities but also solve complex challenges, such as curing all diseases, by decoding the information of life itself.

Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis believes there is virtually no limit to what AI can eventually achieve. "humans as biological information processing systems". He is working on the premise that the entire universe is "computable," meaning that anything that exists can technically be modeled by a machine. He says that a powerful enough computer—conceptually known as a Turing machine—should be able to simulate every aspect of reality. Until physics proves that something is impossible to calculate, he is operating on the belief that AI can solve any problem. This perspective even applies to the things that feel uniquely human. When asked about physical sensations, like feeling the warmth of a light or hearing background noise, Hassabis argued that these are just forms of information being processed by the brain. He views humans as biological information processing systems. By treating biology and reality essentially as data, he believes we will not only replicate human capabilities but also solve complex challenges, such as curing all diseases, by decoding the information of life itself.

Rohan Paul

84,528 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

These stories need to be heard American who wanted to be transgender as a child is so grateful for her mom stopping her and saying no “I am so glad that when I wanted to transition as a teenager, my mom wasn't like, "Okay, we'll get you on hormones." Um, she let me cut my hair and stuff, but hair grows back. I'm glad that the irreversible damage wasn't done to me.” She’s right, there are very real PERMANENT damages that come from transitioning. Here are just a few - Permanent infertility and sterility: Puberty blockers especially at early Tanner stages followed by cross-sex hormones typically prevent full development of reproductive organs and gametes (sperm and eggs) - Loss or impairment of sexual function and sensation - Irreversible voice deepening in females on testosterone - Surgical removal or alteration of healthy tissue: Double mastectomy removes breasts permanently with scarring and potential complications - Long-term skeletal and health impacts like bone density loss. Puberty blockers can reduce peak bone mass

These stories need to be heard American who wanted to be transgender as a child is so grateful for her mom stopping her and saying no “I am so glad that when I wanted to transition as a teenager, my mom wasn't like, "Okay, we'll get you on hormones." Um, she let me cut my hair and stuff, but hair grows back. I'm glad that the irreversible damage wasn't done to me.” She’s right, there are very real PERMANENT damages that come from transitioning. Here are just a few - Permanent infertility and sterility: Puberty blockers especially at early Tanner stages followed by cross-sex hormones typically prevent full development of reproductive organs and gametes (sperm and eggs) - Loss or impairment of sexual function and sensation - Irreversible voice deepening in females on testosterone - Surgical removal or alteration of healthy tissue: Double mastectomy removes breasts permanently with scarring and potential complications - Long-term skeletal and health impacts like bone density loss. Puberty blockers can reduce peak bone mass

Wall Street Apes

120,132 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This boy was transitioned at 11. No child is born in the wrong body. Anyone under the age of 25 cannot be expected to make these life changing decisions. Trans is a cult and it's coming after the children. We need to act now. Ban gender affirming care it's harm

Sensitive content

This boy was transitioned at 11. No child is born in the wrong body. Anyone under the age of 25 cannot be expected to make these life changing decisions. Trans is a cult and it's coming after the children. We need to act now. Ban gender affirming care it's harm

HerTribeVibe

86,131 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🤨 Yvette Cooper is already muddying the waters on the new EHRC statutory code of practice that requires single-sex spaces to be based on biological sex. The code has just come into force. It implements the 2025 Supreme Court ruling that “sex” in the Equality Act means biological sex. Single-sex spaces, wards, toilets and changing rooms are for the sex recorded at birth. Full stop. Stig Abell put the simplest possible question to the Health Secretary on Times Radio: “Let’s be absolutely clear about this, single sex ward, someone who identifies as a woman but was born a man would have to go to a male side of the ward rather than a female side of the ward?” Her reply: “The guidance will be set out shortly to make sure there maybe people who will need additional provision or additional arrangements made. It’s very clear where there is single sex arrangements in place it needs to be done on the basis of biological sex.” “Additional provision.” “Additional arrangements.” This is the classic fudge. The law is clear. The code is clear. Biological sex is the criterion. Yet the moment the question becomes concrete, a male patient on a female ward, the language softens into process, guidance, special cases and future arrangements. We have seen this movie before. Clarity on paper, then endless carve-outs, risk assessments, “individual circumstances” and institutional reluctance to enforce the actual rule. Women end up sharing intimate spaces with males while officials congratulate themselves on “balancing rights”. It should be simple. If a service is single-sex, it is for that sex. People who do not belong to that sex use the opposite-sex facilities. No endless reinvention of the wheel. Instead we get the same tired pattern: pander to a tiny minority, amplify the loudest and angriest voices within it, and treat women’s privacy, safety and dignity as negotiable. The overwhelming majority of the public, and the plain wording of the law, are treated as the awkward obstacle rather than the starting point. Cooper says the law is clear. Then she immediately starts talking as if it isn’t. That is how these things get unpicked in practice. Women have every right to be sceptical.

🤨 Yvette Cooper is already muddying the waters on the new EHRC statutory code of practice that requires single-sex spaces to be based on biological sex. The code has just come into force. It implements the 2025 Supreme Court ruling that “sex” in the Equality Act means biological sex. Single-sex spaces, wards, toilets and changing rooms are for the sex recorded at birth. Full stop. Stig Abell put the simplest possible question to the Health Secretary on Times Radio: “Let’s be absolutely clear about this, single sex ward, someone who identifies as a woman but was born a man would have to go to a male side of the ward rather than a female side of the ward?” Her reply: “The guidance will be set out shortly to make sure there maybe people who will need additional provision or additional arrangements made. It’s very clear where there is single sex arrangements in place it needs to be done on the basis of biological sex.” “Additional provision.” “Additional arrangements.” This is the classic fudge. The law is clear. The code is clear. Biological sex is the criterion. Yet the moment the question becomes concrete, a male patient on a female ward, the language softens into process, guidance, special cases and future arrangements. We have seen this movie before. Clarity on paper, then endless carve-outs, risk assessments, “individual circumstances” and institutional reluctance to enforce the actual rule. Women end up sharing intimate spaces with males while officials congratulate themselves on “balancing rights”. It should be simple. If a service is single-sex, it is for that sex. People who do not belong to that sex use the opposite-sex facilities. No endless reinvention of the wheel. Instead we get the same tired pattern: pander to a tiny minority, amplify the loudest and angriest voices within it, and treat women’s privacy, safety and dignity as negotiable. The overwhelming majority of the public, and the plain wording of the law, are treated as the awkward obstacle rather than the starting point. Cooper says the law is clear. Then she immediately starts talking as if it isn’t. That is how these things get unpicked in practice. Women have every right to be sceptical.

J Stewart

18,844 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A clear example of why language matters in reporting on "men in women's sports." This weekend, biological male AB Hernandez — a California high school senior who previously competed in girls' volleyball — switched to track and field and dominated the girls' jumping events. Female athletes trained for years watched a male competitor take the podium and the victories that should have been theirs. A guest in this news clip this morning rightly described the scene as "discouraging" and "heartbreaking" for the girls who know they "cannot beat a male." Yet even on a conservative outlet, FOX News, the on-air host, Carley Shimkus, repeatedly referred to Hernandez as "she," "her," "biological trans daughter," and "trans female daughter." The segment highlighted Hernandez's mother's claim that the impact on her child was so severe she had to take a leave from work to protect her "trans female daughter's safety and emotional well-being," framing the male athlete as the primary VICTIM. This is not an isolated slip. Mainstream outlets (PBS, NYT, ESPN, etc.) routinely use female pronouns and identifiers for male competitors as a matter of corporate policy, presenting them as women. That framing obscures the biological reality for viewers who aren't steeped in the debate: a male athlete identifying as female is competing in the female category, displacing girls from medals, podiums, scholarships, and records. The core issue is straightforward: Should biological males compete in women's and girls' sports? Fairness, safety, and the integrity of female categories depend on sex-based divisions, not self-identification. Decades of sports science, physiology, and performance data show consistent male advantages in strength, speed, power, and jumping events that do not disappear with testosterone suppression or identity. When even conservative outlets such as Fox adopt the preferred pronouns and "trans daughter" language without clear qualification, it muddies that simple reality for the broader public. Casual viewers hear "she won the girls' triple jump" and assume it's a female athlete — not a male one who just posted a three-foot advantage over the best girls. Accurate journalism doesn't require snark or cruelty. It requires precision: biological male, male athlete, competing in the girls' category. The girls who trained, competed, and lost opportunities deserve that clarity. So does the public trying to understand why this policy debate exists in the first place.

A clear example of why language matters in reporting on "men in women's sports." This weekend, biological male AB Hernandez — a California high school senior who previously competed in girls' volleyball — switched to track and field and dominated the girls' jumping events. Female athletes trained for years watched a male competitor take the podium and the victories that should have been theirs. A guest in this news clip this morning rightly described the scene as "discouraging" and "heartbreaking" for the girls who know they "cannot beat a male." Yet even on a conservative outlet, FOX News, the on-air host, Carley Shimkus, repeatedly referred to Hernandez as "she," "her," "biological trans daughter," and "trans female daughter." The segment highlighted Hernandez's mother's claim that the impact on her child was so severe she had to take a leave from work to protect her "trans female daughter's safety and emotional well-being," framing the male athlete as the primary VICTIM. This is not an isolated slip. Mainstream outlets (PBS, NYT, ESPN, etc.) routinely use female pronouns and identifiers for male competitors as a matter of corporate policy, presenting them as women. That framing obscures the biological reality for viewers who aren't steeped in the debate: a male athlete identifying as female is competing in the female category, displacing girls from medals, podiums, scholarships, and records. The core issue is straightforward: Should biological males compete in women's and girls' sports? Fairness, safety, and the integrity of female categories depend on sex-based divisions, not self-identification. Decades of sports science, physiology, and performance data show consistent male advantages in strength, speed, power, and jumping events that do not disappear with testosterone suppression or identity. When even conservative outlets such as Fox adopt the preferred pronouns and "trans daughter" language without clear qualification, it muddies that simple reality for the broader public. Casual viewers hear "she won the girls' triple jump" and assume it's a female athlete — not a male one who just posted a three-foot advantage over the best girls. Accurate journalism doesn't require snark or cruelty. It requires precision: biological male, male athlete, competing in the girls' category. The girls who trained, competed, and lost opportunities deserve that clarity. So does the public trying to understand why this policy debate exists in the first place.

Gerald Posner

15,185 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Julia Hartley-Brewer PRESSES Peter Tatchell on Trans Women “How Can You Be a Woman If You’re a Man?” Julia Hartley-Brewer: There’s no such thing as a trans child. Do you genuinely believe children can be born in the wrong body? Peter Tatchell: I believe there are children who genuinely believe they are not Julia: But they aren’t born in the wrong body. What do they need to be treated for? Peter: If they’re genuinely trans, which they are in 99% of cases. Julia: What’s that statistic from? Where does the 99% figure come from? Peter: We know from the evidence that puberty blockers have benefited thousands of young people Julia: No, we don’t. That’s not what the studies say. Peter: You keep interrupting me. Don’t be rude, Julia. Julia: Then stop saying things that aren’t true. Peter: Hundreds of thousands of young people have gone through trans treatments successfully and happily around the world. Julia: There’s no adequate follow-up research to make that claim. Did you actually read the Cass Review? Peter: Yes. And Cass did not say young people should be denied puberty blockers or hormone treatment. She said they should be used cautiously. Julia: A large proportion of children who think they’re trans either turn out to be gay and/or are autistic. Isn’t that a strong argument against giving children irreversible treatment? Peter: That’s why the process is slow and rigorous. Nobody goes into a clinic and gets treatment the next day. It can take years. Julia: That simply isn’t true for everyone. Let’s move to another issue. After the Supreme Court judgment, some organisations have said they’ll continue allowing people to access single-sex spaces based on gender identity. If the ruling says biological sex matters, are they right to continue? Peter: There are two important issues: women’s rights and trans people’s rights. We need to reconcile both. Biological sex is a reality, but gender identity is different and, in my view, equally valid. Julia: No. Women are defined by biological sex. Someone who is biologically male can believe they’re a woman, but that doesn’t make them a woman in law or reality. Peter: The Supreme Court didn’t define biological sex Julia: It was very clear that women are defined by biological sex. We know what biological sex is. So how can you be a woman if you’re a man?

Julia Hartley-Brewer PRESSES Peter Tatchell on Trans Women “How Can You Be a Woman If You’re a Man?” Julia Hartley-Brewer: There’s no such thing as a trans child. Do you genuinely believe children can be born in the wrong body? Peter Tatchell: I believe there are children who genuinely believe they are not Julia: But they aren’t born in the wrong body. What do they need to be treated for? Peter: If they’re genuinely trans, which they are in 99% of cases. Julia: What’s that statistic from? Where does the 99% figure come from? Peter: We know from the evidence that puberty blockers have benefited thousands of young people Julia: No, we don’t. That’s not what the studies say. Peter: You keep interrupting me. Don’t be rude, Julia. Julia: Then stop saying things that aren’t true. Peter: Hundreds of thousands of young people have gone through trans treatments successfully and happily around the world. Julia: There’s no adequate follow-up research to make that claim. Did you actually read the Cass Review? Peter: Yes. And Cass did not say young people should be denied puberty blockers or hormone treatment. She said they should be used cautiously. Julia: A large proportion of children who think they’re trans either turn out to be gay and/or are autistic. Isn’t that a strong argument against giving children irreversible treatment? Peter: That’s why the process is slow and rigorous. Nobody goes into a clinic and gets treatment the next day. It can take years. Julia: That simply isn’t true for everyone. Let’s move to another issue. After the Supreme Court judgment, some organisations have said they’ll continue allowing people to access single-sex spaces based on gender identity. If the ruling says biological sex matters, are they right to continue? Peter: There are two important issues: women’s rights and trans people’s rights. We need to reconcile both. Biological sex is a reality, but gender identity is different and, in my view, equally valid. Julia: No. Women are defined by biological sex. Someone who is biologically male can believe they’re a woman, but that doesn’t make them a woman in law or reality. Peter: The Supreme Court didn’t define biological sex Julia: It was very clear that women are defined by biological sex. We know what biological sex is. So how can you be a woman if you’re a man?

Jeff

26,877 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Labor and the Greens have once again vowed to block my Sex Discrimination Amendment (Acknowledging Biological Reality) Bill 2024 because they’re more interested in pushing radical gender ideology than standing up for truth and common sense. This bill fixes the mess they created by inserting "gender identity" into the Sex Discrimination Act. That change has undermined women’s rights, confused our laws, and opened the door to activist-driven policies in schools, workplaces and government departments. My bill removes "gender identity" as a protected category and restores the biological reality of male and female back into the law, where it should be. You can’t change your sex. You are either male or female. That’s determined by your DNA, not by your feelings. This debate matters. We’re seeing the damage done to children, the unfairness in women’s sport, and the silencing of anyone who speaks out. Australians are fed up. I won’t back down and I won’t stop telling the truth.

Labor and the Greens have once again vowed to block my Sex Discrimination Amendment (Acknowledging Biological Reality) Bill 2024 because they’re more interested in pushing radical gender ideology than standing up for truth and common sense. This bill fixes the mess they created by inserting "gender identity" into the Sex Discrimination Act. That change has undermined women’s rights, confused our laws, and opened the door to activist-driven policies in schools, workplaces and government departments. My bill removes "gender identity" as a protected category and restores the biological reality of male and female back into the law, where it should be. You can’t change your sex. You are either male or female. That’s determined by your DNA, not by your feelings. This debate matters. We’re seeing the damage done to children, the unfairness in women’s sport, and the silencing of anyone who speaks out. Australians are fed up. I won’t back down and I won’t stop telling the truth.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

16,544 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Stories like this show how dramatically DNA testing has changed the meaning of family connections. What begins as simple curiosity about ancestry can unexpectedly open the door to life-changing discoveries for both adoptees and biological relatives. I can only imagine the emotions involved when a biological father suddenly receives a notification revealing he has a son he never knew about. For adopted individuals, moments like this can bring excitement, confusion, closure, or even anxiety all at once. What stands out most to me is how deeply human these situations are. Behind every DNA match is a real person with a history, unanswered questions, and emotions that can’t always be predicted. Technology may create the connection, but navigating what comes next still depends on compassion and understanding. Video credits; Lyssa Hamblin | UGC & TikTok Creator

Stories like this show how dramatically DNA testing has changed the meaning of family connections. What begins as simple curiosity about ancestry can unexpectedly open the door to life-changing discoveries for both adoptees and biological relatives. I can only imagine the emotions involved when a biological father suddenly receives a notification revealing he has a son he never knew about. For adopted individuals, moments like this can bring excitement, confusion, closure, or even anxiety all at once. What stands out most to me is how deeply human these situations are. Behind every DNA match is a real person with a history, unanswered questions, and emotions that can’t always be predicted. Technology may create the connection, but navigating what comes next still depends on compassion and understanding. Video credits; Lyssa Hamblin | UGC & TikTok Creator

Dr. CZ

540,175 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten