Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Cosmetic and surgical interventions cannot alter human genetics or biological sex. Performing irreversible, life-altering surgeries under the banner of healthcare raises fundamental ethical questions about long-term physical outcomes. Biological sex remains immutable. No amount of surgical procedure can transform a biological male into a female, or vice versa. Labeling...

16,849 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 35

Фото профиля JK
JK2 дней назад

"Lady voice", MAN VOICE, "Lady voice", MAN VOICE. Fringe goes a long way back...

Фото профиля HerTribeVibe
HerTribeVibe2 дней назад

Male pattern baldness

Фото профиля PissheadPat
PissheadPat2 дней назад

Trans is a cult

Фото профиля Schrödinger's Lesbian ⚢
Schrödinger's Lesbian ⚢2 дней назад

Yes the genetics 🧬 that the surgeon is referring to is that you’re a man.

Фото профиля Don'tShoveTheLesbians🌞
Don'tShoveTheLesbians🌞2 дней назад

"I'm a very open book, ignore the filters that lie to you." And no, it's not just a rare genetic condition that tries to close an extreme open wound, sir.

Фото профиля Molly Malarkey 🇺🇸
Molly Malarkey 🇺🇸2 дней назад

Everything about this is so monstrous.

Фото профиля JTB
JTB2 дней назад

It’s the surgeons, they need to be struck off , it’s no different to the things that have been done to Katie price , it’s criminal to change healthy body parts because of a mental body dysmorphia . Treat the illness !

Фото профиля HerTribeVibe
HerTribeVibe2 дней назад

I agree

Фото профиля Sharon Ball MIMS
Sharon Ball MIMS2 дней назад

He didn't look hard enough. Plenty out there saying ow bad it is.

Фото профиля Devonshire Pixie 🇬🇧💙🇮🇱
Devonshire Pixie 🇬🇧💙🇮🇱2 дней назад

Those filters are doing the heavy lifting 😆

Фото профиля TheTerfinator
TheTerfinator2 дней назад

It's a cult

Фото профиля Larkspur
Larkspur2 дней назад

I heard that it is an everlasting infectious hole!

Фото профиля Sharon🚜🚜🚜🚜🚜
Sharon🚜🚜🚜🚜🚜2 дней назад

An open wound is just that not a vagina

Фото профиля Jason Bourne The1st
Jason Bourne The1st2 дней назад

The filters don’t hide the giant male skull and male pattern baldness.

Фото профиля Tracey Russell
Tracey Russell2 дней назад

If you were meant to have a vagina, you would have been born with one, like a WOMAN.

Фото профиля Gerry Aubergine
Gerry Aubergine2 дней назад

Cosmetic surgery may change the appearance of a person, but it doesn't change their fundamental nature.

Фото профиля GenXreacts
GenXreacts2 дней назад

TIMs and TIFs looking at one another.

Фото профиля Becca Begotten🏳️‍⚧️
Becca Begotten🏳️‍⚧️2 дней назад

Hormones change biology to the other sex. Even to the point where it alters DNA messaging and the body starts making female blood protiens. Trans women are biologically and fully female.

Фото профиля Reggie Stratocaster
Reggie Stratocaster2 дней назад

It seems he had really bad surgery and there is no accountability for the surgeon who seemed aloof to his patients issues.This person may have temporarily dealt with this surgical complication but his problems with life may only be just beginning. This is gender affirming care.

Фото профиля Kerry Griffiths
Kerry Griffiths2 дней назад

All that pain and suffering and time off work all because of autogynophilia.

Фото профиля Nicky Chaleunphone 🇺🇸
Nicky Chaleunphone 🇺🇸2 дней назад

Don't worry, his mortician will see him in the near future

Фото профиля GoatOlive
GoatOlive2 дней назад

The government is paying to support these sick men that they also mutilate. He probably got government benefits the whole time while actual women are out there slaving away in the workforce.

Фото профиля GloriaGlasspool
GloriaGlasspool2 дней назад

Where to start! He's clearly convincing himself that it was the right decision, although the cognitive dissonance is palpable. He was lied to all the way through. He is some mother's son 😢

Фото профиля Trishicut
Trishicut2 дней назад

Crazy how a wound refuses to stay open.

Фото профиля Lana
Lana2 дней назад

Unbelievable his job gave him a year off for this shit

Фото профиля Lydia Sweeting
Lydia Sweeting2 дней назад

Oy. AGAIN with strangers practising medicine on people they've never met. Every major medical body calls this care. But do go on.

Фото профиля Adolf Hitler 2.0
Adolf Hitler 2.02 дней назад

He mutulated himself in the worst posible way. He was a (physical) healthy man now he has an open wound insted of genetalia. The wound this guy calls vagina will try to close as soon as possible. He cant even pie, no way back. He got jewed* gender is tallmud.

Фото профиля Wolf
Wolf2 дней назад

Antes hacían un agujero en el suelo, se conocía como enterrar al muerto. Era una práctica más loable que todo lo que estamos escuchando

Фото профиля Kris Murray Browne 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇪🇺🇵🇸
Kris Murray Browne 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇪🇺🇵🇸2 дней назад

You fuck with Mother Nature, Mother Nature will fuck with you

Фото профиля Trainswoman
Trainswoman2 дней назад

they act like it’s their own personal womb and they’re having their periods and it’s biologically unique to them to suffer the growing pains of surgical intervention to invert your penis and leave a gaping wound that smells like shit. just like a woman’s period!

Фото профиля Jill 💙 🇺🇦
Jill 💙 🇺🇦2 дней назад

”Genetics” was the cause of his problems according to his surgeon. Yes, because his genetics are male, his body is not supposed to support a man made cavity and will try to heal it. So, now he’s a man with a cavity which will need permanent care - so NOT a vagina.

Фото профиля Lady_Sapientia
Lady_Sapientia2 дней назад

Your Dr. said that your problem was "genetics"? That you're actually a man and your body knows it's not supposed to have a gaping hole in the bottom of your torso besides your anus? You couldn't find anybody else who had those problems because it's a new fad? Interesting....

Фото профиля women matter
women matter2 дней назад

Oh dear

Фото профиля PissheadPat
PissheadPat2 дней назад

Fkin el

Фото профиля Kelcey
Kelcey2 дней назад

If he thinks he has won the war with his body, buddy have I got news for you. This will be an ongoing problem for you sadly. Was it worth it?

Похожие видео

🤨 Yvette Cooper is already muddying the waters on the new EHRC statutory code of practice that requires single-sex spaces to be based on biological sex. The code has just come into force. It implements the 2025 Supreme Court ruling that “sex” in the Equality Act means biological sex. Single-sex spaces, wards, toilets and changing rooms are for the sex recorded at birth. Full stop. Stig Abell put the simplest possible question to the Health Secretary on Times Radio: “Let’s be absolutely clear about this, single sex ward, someone who identifies as a woman but was born a man would have to go to a male side of the ward rather than a female side of the ward?” Her reply: “The guidance will be set out shortly to make sure there maybe people who will need additional provision or additional arrangements made. It’s very clear where there is single sex arrangements in place it needs to be done on the basis of biological sex.” “Additional provision.” “Additional arrangements.” This is the classic fudge. The law is clear. The code is clear. Biological sex is the criterion. Yet the moment the question becomes concrete, a male patient on a female ward, the language softens into process, guidance, special cases and future arrangements. We have seen this movie before. Clarity on paper, then endless carve-outs, risk assessments, “individual circumstances” and institutional reluctance to enforce the actual rule. Women end up sharing intimate spaces with males while officials congratulate themselves on “balancing rights”. It should be simple. If a service is single-sex, it is for that sex. People who do not belong to that sex use the opposite-sex facilities. No endless reinvention of the wheel. Instead we get the same tired pattern: pander to a tiny minority, amplify the loudest and angriest voices within it, and treat women’s privacy, safety and dignity as negotiable. The overwhelming majority of the public, and the plain wording of the law, are treated as the awkward obstacle rather than the starting point. Cooper says the law is clear. Then she immediately starts talking as if it isn’t. That is how these things get unpicked in practice. Women have every right to be sceptical.

J Stewart

18,844 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A clear example of why language matters in reporting on "men in women's sports." This weekend, biological male AB Hernandez — a California high school senior who previously competed in girls' volleyball — switched to track and field and dominated the girls' jumping events. Female athletes trained for years watched a male competitor take the podium and the victories that should have been theirs. A guest in this news clip this morning rightly described the scene as "discouraging" and "heartbreaking" for the girls who know they "cannot beat a male." Yet even on a conservative outlet, FOX News, the on-air host, Carley Shimkus, repeatedly referred to Hernandez as "she," "her," "biological trans daughter," and "trans female daughter." The segment highlighted Hernandez's mother's claim that the impact on her child was so severe she had to take a leave from work to protect her "trans female daughter's safety and emotional well-being," framing the male athlete as the primary VICTIM. This is not an isolated slip. Mainstream outlets (PBS, NYT, ESPN, etc.) routinely use female pronouns and identifiers for male competitors as a matter of corporate policy, presenting them as women. That framing obscures the biological reality for viewers who aren't steeped in the debate: a male athlete identifying as female is competing in the female category, displacing girls from medals, podiums, scholarships, and records. The core issue is straightforward: Should biological males compete in women's and girls' sports? Fairness, safety, and the integrity of female categories depend on sex-based divisions, not self-identification. Decades of sports science, physiology, and performance data show consistent male advantages in strength, speed, power, and jumping events that do not disappear with testosterone suppression or identity. When even conservative outlets such as Fox adopt the preferred pronouns and "trans daughter" language without clear qualification, it muddies that simple reality for the broader public. Casual viewers hear "she won the girls' triple jump" and assume it's a female athlete — not a male one who just posted a three-foot advantage over the best girls. Accurate journalism doesn't require snark or cruelty. It requires precision: biological male, male athlete, competing in the girls' category. The girls who trained, competed, and lost opportunities deserve that clarity. So does the public trying to understand why this policy debate exists in the first place.

Gerald Posner

15,185 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Julia Hartley-Brewer PRESSES Peter Tatchell on Trans Women “How Can You Be a Woman If You’re a Man?” Julia Hartley-Brewer: There’s no such thing as a trans child. Do you genuinely believe children can be born in the wrong body? Peter Tatchell: I believe there are children who genuinely believe they are not Julia: But they aren’t born in the wrong body. What do they need to be treated for? Peter: If they’re genuinely trans, which they are in 99% of cases. Julia: What’s that statistic from? Where does the 99% figure come from? Peter: We know from the evidence that puberty blockers have benefited thousands of young people Julia: No, we don’t. That’s not what the studies say. Peter: You keep interrupting me. Don’t be rude, Julia. Julia: Then stop saying things that aren’t true. Peter: Hundreds of thousands of young people have gone through trans treatments successfully and happily around the world. Julia: There’s no adequate follow-up research to make that claim. Did you actually read the Cass Review? Peter: Yes. And Cass did not say young people should be denied puberty blockers or hormone treatment. She said they should be used cautiously. Julia: A large proportion of children who think they’re trans either turn out to be gay and/or are autistic. Isn’t that a strong argument against giving children irreversible treatment? Peter: That’s why the process is slow and rigorous. Nobody goes into a clinic and gets treatment the next day. It can take years. Julia: That simply isn’t true for everyone. Let’s move to another issue. After the Supreme Court judgment, some organisations have said they’ll continue allowing people to access single-sex spaces based on gender identity. If the ruling says biological sex matters, are they right to continue? Peter: There are two important issues: women’s rights and trans people’s rights. We need to reconcile both. Biological sex is a reality, but gender identity is different and, in my view, equally valid. Julia: No. Women are defined by biological sex. Someone who is biologically male can believe they’re a woman, but that doesn’t make them a woman in law or reality. Peter: The Supreme Court didn’t define biological sex Julia: It was very clear that women are defined by biological sex. We know what biological sex is. So how can you be a woman if you’re a man?

Jeff

26,877 просмотров • 4 дней назад