Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Could bitcoin reach $10,000,000 by Q1 2035? Most would dismiss it as impossible—even many long-term bitcoin holders. But two structural transformations suggest otherwise. In my first quarterly letter, I explore why this scenario may be more plausible than it seems.

42,743 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

Joe Burnett, MSBA profil fotoğrafı
Joe Burnett, MSBA1 yıl önce

Read the full letter: Q1 2035—$10M Bitcoin →

Michael Anton Fischer profil fotoğrafı
Michael Anton Fischer2 yıl önce

Struggling with economic concepts? Bitcoin Nation simplifies the foundations of money and explains how Bitcoin can address issues like hyperinflation and economic instability. This accessible guide is perfect for beginners looking to understand the potential of sound money.

George profil fotoğrafı
George1 yıl önce

The extrapolation sounds super logical to me and aligns with my thinking. The level of asymmetry in this bet is incredible over the medium to long term.

Tomek Ziomek profil fotoğrafı
Tomek Ziomek1 yıl önce

Imagine normies or npc buying btc at $7mln? Idk broski. Unless hyperinflation occurs.

GOD EMPEROR ELON ⚡️ profil fotoğrafı
GOD EMPEROR ELON ⚡️1 yıl önce

Joe is my favorite hopium merchant.

WOLF Crypto profil fotoğrafı
WOLF Crypto1 yıl önce

Let's see how it unfolds!

Jonathan profil fotoğrafı
Jonathan1 yıl önce

$10M by 2029

God Fearing Atheist 🔸 profil fotoğrafı
God Fearing Atheist 🔸1 yıl önce

Fairly similar projections. I like them both (bottom)! As Bitcoin's market cap grows, it requires increasingly larger inflows to push the price up by the same X%. For example, I've heard a 30:1 where $1B inflows in the ETFs increase the market cap by $30B. As the total market cap increases, that percentage increase keeps decreasing ($30B/$2T vs $30B/$4T). Hence the diminishing CAGR of the Power Law over time. That' makes sense to me. Over time the yearly inflows will continue increasing, but will result in gradually lower % yearly (average) price increases. Power Law Model: Projects $1.8M per bitcoin by 2035. Saylor’s Bitcoin24 Model: Suggests $2.1M per bitcoin by 2035. Interesting about the Adidas Speedfactories - I had never heard of that before! neat! Amazing stats about gold!!

Inked Investing profil fotoğrafı
Inked Investing1 yıl önce

It’s very possible

b·a·b·y·f·a·c·e j·o·h·n·s·o·n 👶🏻🍼 profil fotoğrafı
b·a·b·y·f·a·c·e j·o·h·n·s·o·n 👶🏻🍼1 yıl önce

In 2045 maybe

Jason Thomas profil fotoğrafı
Jason Thomas1 yıl önce

Fuck off.

Benzer Videolar

Michael Saylor's end game is to buy $3 trillion worth of #Bitcoin! 👀 Microstrategy could, CONSERVATIVELY, own approximately 16% of the total Bitcoin Supply or 3,439,002 Bitcoin!! For those that think this is a MOONBOI projection, listen to the video clip below, VERY CLOSELY, and you will hear him say that he plans on buying $3 trillion worth of Bitcoin 🤯 Even if Saylor buys $3 trillion worth of Bitcoin, at an average price of $1 million per coin, he would be able to buy 3,000,000 Bitcoin! Check my math! This would CONSERVATIVELY bring his total Bitcoin holdings to 3,444,262, or 16% of the total Bitcoin Supply!! Saylor could single handedly jack the price of Bitcoin to $1 million per coin and Samson Mow's Omega candle could be coming in 2025. What going to happen when Nation States, Google, Amazon, Facebook and billions of people complement Saylor's $3 trillion purchase? What is bigger than an omega candle? I asked GROK and it doesn't even know! 😂 I think we should name it the ♾️ candle. This would be representative of Wicked's Stock to Fomo model (see graphic below) and his post: Saylor has said he is going to double his $42 Billion Bitcoin investment at least 4 times and here is how this could lead to him acquiring more than 4 million Bitcoin in 2025: Q1 2025 - Raise $84 Billion to buy 700,000 Bitcoin at average price of $120k/Bitcoin. Q2 2025 - Raise $168 Billion to buy 988,235 Bitcoin at average price of $170k/Bitcoin Q3 2025 - Raise $336 Billion to buy 1,050,000 Bitcoin at average price of $320k/Bitcoin Q4 2025 - Raise $672 Billion to buy 1,680,000 Bitcoin at average price of $400k/Bitcoin In one year there is the possibility that he could REALISTICALLY buy 4,418,235 Bitcoin!! I say "realistically" because the demand for Saylor's $42 Billion equity raise was so great that he is going to be able to use it all up in 3-4 months instead of the projected 3 years!!🤯 This would bring their current Bitcoin holdings of 444,262 Bitcoin to 4,857,237!!!! Or 23% of all Bitcoin!! Calculations are based on our post below: We are closer to $1 million Bitcoin than you think. I believe we will get to this price sooner than Wicked 's projected date of 4/4/2030. I agree with Samson that we get to $1 million per coin by the end of 2025! Hold on to your hat, because we are about to experience exponential, LIFTOFF. To understand exponential growth, envision yourself holding two very powerful magnets. As you start to bring the two magnets together, it gets harder to hold them apart and all of a sudden, BAM, they clap together! This is what we are about to experience, a SUDDEN BAM, in the price of Bitcoin as adoption goes from <1% to 10% in a very short time frame. Now you may better understand why Saylor is frantically, but intelligently, trying to buy $42 Billion of Bitcoin. As an engineer he understands what exponential demand will cause to the price of a finite commodity. Saylor has been on record as saying that "he will be buying the top forever." Don't ever underestimate an astro/aeronautical MIT engineer.

Satoshi’s Journal

280,298 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Most people still think Metaplanet $MPJPY $MTPLF is just "Japan's" $MSTR. They're missing the bigger picture. Metaplanet isn't copying Strategy. It's building a global Bitcoin capital machine that could become impossible to compete with. In this conversation with THE BITCOIN PHARAOH, we discuss: • Why Metaplanet's strategy is fundamentally different • The hidden advantage of operating in Japan • What $STRC and $SATA taught every Bitcoin treasury • Why cash-flow businesses may be the next evolution of Bitcoin treasury companies • Why Strive $ASST is emerging as a serious contender • What Metaplanet could become in a Bitcoin standard 00:00 Introduction: The BTCPharaoh's Bitcoin Journey 07:09 Why Metaplanet Is Different From Every Other Bitcoin Treasury 11:03 Mercury & Mars: The Next Bitcoin Financial Products? 11:52 What Metaplanet Learned From Strategy's STRC Depeg 15:26 Will Bitcoin Preferred Shares Become Truly Stable? 19:05 Is Metaplanet About to Launch a U.S. Preferred Stock? 20:57 Why Japan Gives Metaplanet a Massive Advantage 22:47 The "Double Carry Trade" That Could Supercharge Bitcoin Buying 26:34 Why Metaplanet Isn't Just Copying Strategy 29:39 Simon Gerovich's Long-Term Vision Is Finally Making Sense 30:12 Will Metaplanet Build Bitcoin Infrastructure Beyond Finance? 32:27 Why the New Board Members Could Change Everything 34:08 Why Less Communication Might Actually Be Bullish 37:56 The One Question He Would Ask Simon Gerovich 39:45 Is NAKA a Hidden Opportunity... or a Value Trap? 45:01 The Most Underrated Bitcoin Treasury Company Right Now 47:55 Europe Could Be the Next Bitcoin Treasury Battleground 48:40 Bitcoin Price Outlook: Bull Market or Bear Market? 50:55 The Biggest Mistake Bitcoin Investors Keep Making 52:19 Where to Follow TheBTCPharaoh Watch the full episode 👇

One Chair

86,977 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Did Epstein influence Bitcoin core development? Short answer: No. This is not how Bitcoin works. Here’s what happened: Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab…who in turn supported MIT Digital Currency Initiative…which in turn funded Bitcoin developers. These devs used to be funded by The Bitcoin Foundation (which I used to run as volunteer Executive Director) there are many devs and no dev or team had power or control over Bitcoin. Under MIT’s patronage the devs had the same deal they had with us at The Bitcoin Foundation: that they could work on the code and not have direction from the org. More importantly — how Bitcoin works is that *even if* a dev was compromised then the nodes and miners would still have to run that code to make it included in Bitcoin. So for example if I had somehow asked the devs paid by Bitcoin Foundation to “add 1000 coins for Bruce” 1) they wouldn’t have done this / it would have been counter to our agreement 2) no miners would run that code & no nodes would recognize it. It would be a laughing stock and completely rejected. Does this mean code dev is not an attack vector? No. It’s still a risk. Particularly with nation state style actors and very careful efforts to co-opt which are much more sophisticated than “give Bruce coins” or something. This is one reason I’m cautious of Bitcoin core funding - especially from actors who’ve had bad judgment in the past. I think we should be cautious of who does the dev and view it as an attack vector. Bitcoin code is transparent and has lots of eyes on it. So in this case especially there isn’t even a solid accusation, let alone evidence that MIT directed nefarious code changes. If that was an allegation the first question should be: well what code specifically did MIT direct and what proof is there and how was it harmful? I think claims around this would collapse. There’s obviously plenty to criticize about Epstein and MIT working with him — and when it comes to digital assets MIT’s work with Gensler and especially its work on CBDCs is much more suspect than the chance that malicious code was pushed through on Bitcoin. Be cautious but this is a nothing burger

Bruce Fenton

231,841 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce