正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Countries want viable solutions to cut emissions while powering their economies. My message to #COP29: to reach #NetZero, our energy-hungry world needs nuclear power.

16,738 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

6 条评论

Dr Paul Dorfman 的头像
Dr Paul Dorfman1 年前

Meanwhile, IPCC state renewables 10 times more effective than nuclear in combating climate.

Juan Martínez 的头像
Juan Martínez1 年前

¡Absolutamente de acuerdo! La energía nuclear es fundamental para reducir las emisiones y alcanzar el objetivo de cero emisiones netas.

Rui Curado 的头像
Rui Curado1 年前

Dear Rafael nuclear energy is and will be almost irrelevant for climate change. Science show it over and over: Nuclear science as you say can do a lot for medicine and agriculture, but also for new materials and fundamental science. That is the way to go

Christophe Fichet 的头像
Christophe Fichet1 年前

@fmomboisse This conference in Azerbaijan is a scandal

Aidan 的头像
Aidan1 年前

If by nuclear power you mean nuke China then yeah

unclefes 的头像
unclefes1 年前

Bye to global pacs for us, we voted against all this grift and corruption.

相关视频

We believe that there’s no future without nuclear energy. We support the goal of tripling nuclear energy capacity by 2050 to get to net-zero emissions. However, we can’t achieve this goal without addressing these two things: 1 - 𝗔𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲-𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀: Over and over again we’ve witnessed a troubling pattern: when nuclear power plants are shut down, they’re replaced by fossil fuels. This transition not only makes governments more reliant on polluting energy imports, but also makes it lot harder to reduce our greenhouse gas emission. Given the urgency of the climate and energy crisis we face today, both of these outcomes are unacceptable. For these reasons we strongly condemn nuclear energy phase-outs and instead advocate for countries to extend the life of their existing nuclear reactors. By doing so, nations can decrease their dependence on fossil fuels, maintain a more sustainable energy mix, and make substantial progress towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 2 - 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁: The WorldBank extends grants for low and middle-income countries to fund various initiatives, including clean energy projects. The last time it approved a nuclear energy project was six decades ago. Since then, the World Bank and other multilateral development banks have completely stopped supporting nuclear power. Not only do they refuse to provide financial support, they also refrain from offering any strategic planning guidance to countries looking to build nuclear power plants. It’s a de facto ban on nuclear energy, since these projects tend to be expensive and beyond the means of low to middle-income countries. We urge the World Bank and other similar financing institutions to update their stance on this matter and hire the necessary staff to assess nuclear energy projects. Me, Stand Up for Nuclear and WePlanet joined forces ahead of the first every nuclear energy summit held in Brussels, to make our voices heard through art. We’re ready to turn the world Inside Out and step into our clean energy future! Let’s go ⚡️ Learn more at:

isabelle 🪐

109,407 次观看 • 2 年前