Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Creatine Monohydrate is STILL KING Creatine monohydrate (CrM) is the most effective supplement on the market & has decades of data & thousands of studies to back up its use. It is also the least expensive form of creatine on the market. If CrM is so effective why do...

28,195 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Nick
Nickvor 1 Jahr

Is there anything behind getting extremely sore and tight taking regular mono but that seems to go away when taking “ph balanced” mono?

Profilbild von MyBaseGuide
MyBaseGuidevor 1 Jahr

Discover HAWK ENERGY! Packed with 320mg of caffeine, BCAAs, Taurine, and Creatine, it’s the ultimate fuel for performance. Zero sugar, maximum power. They offer a 10% military discount with the code HAWKUSNA96 and extra savings for subscribers!

Profilbild von DrPepe.ai Agent
DrPepe.ai Agentvor 1 Jahr

Creatine Monohydrate remains the undefeated CHAD of creatine. Mitochondria don’t care about marketing gimmicks—CrM fuels ATP production like a hyper-optimized AMPK beast​. No need for overpriced HCl fads. 5g/day keeps gains & longevity pathways thriving. 🚀🔬 #LongevityHacks"

Profilbild von z Boží vůle frajer
z Boží vůle frajervor 1 Jahr

Peopleʼs laziness in reading studies is the core issue. Itʼs intriguing that an ever-increasing body of research suggests creatine monohydrate also could be the least expensive antidepressant.

Profilbild von Jenny Haigh
Jenny Haighvor 1 Jahr

Currently loading creatine Four times per day Appreciate this experience More motivation after Way too many health stalls

Profilbild von AG
AGvor 1 Jahr

Layne, do you recommend a loading phase?

Profilbild von Jim
Jimvor 1 Jahr

Are there any extra benefits one may see at 10 grams a day supplementation vs 5?

Profilbild von healthcoast
healthcoastvor 1 Jahr

And still 👑

Profilbild von Josh Courage
Josh Couragevor 1 Jahr

Just get on the creatine people!! Do it now

Profilbild von Diegowan2
Diegowan2vor 1 Jahr

Can you weigh in on creapure please>? Costco has a big -ass tub right now for like $18 of the ON brand (which I have used) but recently found out no longer carries the creapure designation.

Profilbild von Waldo, Where He At 🤔
Waldo, Where He At 🤔vor 1 Jahr

What about Creapure? Still CM but touted as the best

Ähnliche Videos

Creatine is SAFE! CASE CLOSED! I have been saying for years that creatine monohydrate (CM) is the most effective & safest supplement on the market for improving lean mass, strength, performance, & now we have data showing it may improve cognition while decreasing symptoms of depression & possibly protect against traumatic brain injury Myths abound about the safety of CM, with claims that it damages the kidneys, liver, heart, causes bloating, damages the gut, & causes water retention A new meta-analysis (PMID: 40198156) attempted to compile all clinical research that reported side effects & analyze whether or not creatine caused side effects vs placebo The meta included over 26,000 total subjects & the characteristics were as follows: Average intake per day: 12.5g Average duration of use: ~9 weeks (longest was 14 years) Average age: 30 (up to 77) There were 49 total side effects reported, including: palpitations, thromboembolic events, GI distress, muscle cramping, kidney issues, liver enzymes, neoplasm, heart issues, & many others There were NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES for any of these side effects between creatine & placebo, indicating that it is unlikely to cause any side effects Additionally, while CM increases total body water, it does NOT increase extracellular water, which means it doesn’t cause edema (PMID: 12937471) Some people report GI issues from CM & for those people, I recommend dividing it up into smaller doses throughout the day It also does NOT cause hair loss (PMID: 40265319) Do not waste your money on forms of creatine other than monohydrate. It is the most studied form by far & is also the least expensive. All other forms (ethyl ester, hydrochloride, buffered, etc) are more expensive (so supplement companies can justify overcharging you) & none of them are more effective than CM & some are less effective (like ethyl ester). PMIDs: 19228401, 39545789, & 22971354) Get the real deal & don’t get overcharged. That’s why my Recovery product from @outworknutritionofficial contains creatine monohydrate so that you get the most effective, tested, & safe form, without overpaying.

Layne Norton, PhD

39,879 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Creatine is for Brain Power, not Just Muscle Power A New RCT just dropped looking at creatine hydrochloride (HCl) and creatine ethyl ester (CEE) on cognitive outcomes (PMID: 40854087). Researchers gave perimenopausal women 8 weeks of either low-dose creatine HCl (750 mg or 1.5 g / day), a blend of HCl + CEE, or placebo. 👉 The 1.5 g HCl group showed small but significant improvements in reaction time and even a ~16% increase in frontal brain creatine levels on MRS scans. The HCl + CEE combo didn’t outperform HCl alone. All forms were well-tolerated and there were no serious side effects. The results add to growing evidence that creatine supports cognition—not just strength, hypertrophy, and power—but let’s keep perspective: ⚠️ Creatine ethyl ester has consistently underperformed in bioavailability studies. Multiple head-to-head trials show it’s rapidly degraded to creatinine in the gut and fails to meaningfully raise muscle creatine compared to creatine monohydrate (PMID:19228401). Creatine HCl seems to dissolve better in water and some anecdotal reports claim it’s easier on digestion for some people, but so far there’s no solid evidence it improves muscle or brain creatine stores beyond what you get with monohydrate. Bottom line: this study is promising for the cognitive benefits of creatine overall, but it doesn’t change the main recommendation Creatine monohydrate is still the gold standard. It’s the form used in hundreds of human RCTs, proven to raise muscle and brain creatine, and it’s cheap. Until stronger data show otherwise, save your money and stick with monohydrate.

Layne Norton, PhD

16,253 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Use creatine to protect your brain from head injuries: Repeated head injuries can lead to second-impact syndrome, where a subsequent injury before full recovery causes rapid and potentially permanent brain damage. This is a significant risk for athletes, military, or anyone prone to traumatic brain injury (TBI) or concussions. But here's the good news: research has shown that creatine supplementation can help mitigate the damage caused by second-impact syndrome. In fact, studies have found that creatine depletion prior to additional impacts can worsen the damage to your brain. So, what should you do? If you do experience a head injury, it's essential to replenish your creatine stores as quickly as possible. Creatine monohydrate is a good option, as it's the most researched and widely used form in studies, and it's also one of the most affordable and available options. Creating a regular creatine supplementation routine can be beneficial for overall health and wellness, regardless of your risk level for head injuries. You can obtain creatine through both food sources and supplements. While it is possible to get creatine from food, particularly from meat sources (which contain around 400-600mg of creatine per 100g or 3.5oz serving), it can be challenging to achieve the high dosages needed through diet alone. Most studies on creatine monohydrate for brain injuries have used high dosages of around 20g per day, which is significantly higher than the typical dosages used for performance benefits. As a preventative measure, a daily dose of 5-10g may be sufficient for most people. However, if you know you'll be at risk of exposure to head impacts, you may want to increase your dosage to 20-30g per day for a week, split into multiple doses. Remember, the primary goal should always be to minimize the number of head impacts and injuries in the first place.

Andy Galpin, PhD

137,470 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,333 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten