Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

#cumshot Ejaculating is something deeply masculine and should be unreservedly public and not something that is be done in secret under the duvet, in quiet corners or locked away in the bathroom. Men love it, so take me as an example and do it publicly. RT and spread the wordโ€ฆ

59,740 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๆš‚ๆ— ่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๅŽŸๅง‹ๅธ–ๅญ็š„่ฏ„่ฎบๅฐ†ๆ˜พ็คบๅœจ่ฟ™้‡Œ

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

Shaikh Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbad on the permissibility of publicly criticizing Muslim rulers. Presenter: The question that is repeatedly asked is regarding the permissibility of openly doing Inkaar (criticism) of the Imams (Muslim leaders) in front of the general public or openly? Shaikh Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbad Al- Badr: "If no harm results from it, there is no objection. That is, if one witnesses something objectionable, they should clarify it. They should clarify this objectionable matter because when the wrong becomes apparent, denouncing it also becomes apparent as consequence of the wrong's manifestation." Presenter: There are those who say that there is a distinction between giving advice to rulers (Naseehah) and denouncing what is wrong (inkar-ul-Munkar), say that it is Naseehah (advice) that should be given privately. As for the first matter, it is known that if something wrong is done publicly, then it should be criticized publicly , using Abu Sa'eed Al-Khudri's action as an evidence. Shaikh Abdul Muhsin Al-Abbad Al-Badr: Undoubtedly, giving advice in private and writing to them or contacting them is without doubt beneficial, and its benefit will be achieved by Allah's permission. However, if something wrong occurs and people witness it, remaining silent about the wrong essentially means accepting it [the evil] and failing to denounce it. Thus, denouncing it and explaining that it is impermissible is similar to what occurred with Abu Sa'eed Al-Khudri.

ibn Harun

11,962 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰