Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Current development progress of the world: I didn’t expect that converting a single map into a system that assigns different maps based on the number of participants would take a full two weeks. If everything goes smoothly, it should be completed in March. #VRChat #EvilFallSet

15,410 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

A map from 1531 reveals something that could rewrite all of human history. “The map maker tells us he uncovered material previously hidden in darkness … ” If you’ve never heard of the Orontius Finaeus map, this will blow your mind: Graham Hancock: “The Orontius Finaeus map shows Antarctica.” “This map was drawn in 1531.” “The problem is that our civilization didn’t discover Antarctica until 1820.” This map is a key piece of evidence that Hancock raises to support his theory of a lost, ancient civilization. “When I say a lost civilization, I do not mean a civilization like ours.” “I think they were very different civilization from ours.” “But they had conquered a number of peaks.” “One of those peaks was navigation and ocean seafaring.” “Hence the survival of maps, which show the world as it looked during the Ice Age.” “Another was astronomy.” “Another really important breakthrough evidenced by the ancient maps … is accurate relative longitudes.” “Particularly when we know that the map was based on older source maps.” “Had somebody found Antarctica long before we did and mapped it with extremely accurate relative longitudes?” “Our civilization didn’t crack the longitude problem until the mid-18th century.” “We didn’t get that until 1750, 1760s, there abouts, with Harrison’s chronometer.” “So finding good longitudes on very ancient maps is another puzzle that I don’t think archeology solved.” Graham Hancock Steven Bartlett

Holden Culotta

68,492 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Top architect of Australian immigration system openly states that Australians would not vote for current migration system if they had the chance to vote on it democratically. WALKER: “Do you think if that system was put to the Australian public as a proposition they would have voted for it or supported it politically?” PARKINSON: “I don’t think they were they would have at all.” Full exchange: WALKER: So we’ve kind of drifted into this almost guest worker system as you mentioned earlier. Yeah, there about 2.3 give or take 2.3 million people here at the moment on temporary visas with work rights. Do you think if that system was put to the Australian public as a proposition they would have voted for it or supported it politically? PARKINSON: I don’t think they were they would have at all. Um and indeed we say in the report that uh we’ve ended up with a sort of a group of permanent temporaries almost a quasi guest worker system without anybody consciously sitting down to decide that we should do this — and that if you ask the Australian public, um, as a review we thought it would be highly unlikely that they would have agreed to that. Now, we should be careful that 2.3 million, they’re not all people who would fall into the guest worker group. And there’s only a, you know, sort of 100,000 maybe 200,000 of those who’d fall into the permanently temporary underclass group. He then explains that 700,000 people in this class are New Zealand citizens, about 800,000 are international students, another 200,000 are working holiday makers, etc. They wouldn’t be counted towards NOM figures because they aren’t present in Australia for 12 months out of 16, etc.

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

73,514 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat