Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

cursor just made every $200/month copilot subscription look like a scam dropped today with their own coding model what took 8 hours of manual coding now takes 30 seconds and it runs 8 versions of itself in parallel to pick the best solution while github's charging $20/month for autocomplete,...

NoahEpstein_'s profile picture

Nozz

37,103 subscribers

240,174 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 Claude Code costs $200/month. GitHub Copilot costs $19/month. Jack Dorsey's company built a free alternative. 35,000 GitHub stars. It's called Goose. An open source AI agent built by Block that goes beyond code suggestions. It installs, executes, edits, and tests. With any LLM you choose. Not autocomplete. Not suggestions. A full autonomous agent that takes actions on your computer. No vendor lock-in. No monthly subscription. Bring your own model. Here's what Goose does: → Works with ANY LLM. Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek, Ollama. Your choice. → Reads and understands your entire codebase → Writes, edits, and refactors code across multiple files → Runs shell commands and installs dependencies → Executes and debugs your code automatically → Extensible through MCP. Connect it to any external tool. → Desktop app, CLI, and web interface. Pick your workflow. → Written in Rust. Fast. Lightweight. No bloat. Here's the wildest part: Block is a $40 billion company. They built Cash App, Square, and TIDAL. They use Goose internally. Then they open sourced the entire thing. This isn't a side project from a random developer. This is production-grade tooling from a company that processes billions in payments. Built for their own engineers. Given to everyone. Claude Code: $200/month. Locked to Claude. GitHub Copilot: $19/month. Locked to GitHub. Cursor: $20/month. Locked to their editor. Goose: Free. Any LLM. Any editor. Any workflow. Forever. 35.3K GitHub stars. 3.3K forks. 4,078 commits. Built by Block. 100% Open Source. Apache 2.0 License.
1:49

🚨 Claude Code costs $200/month. GitHub Copilot costs $19/month. Jack Dorsey's company built a free alternative. 35,000 GitHub stars. It's called Goose. An open source AI agent built by Block that goes beyond code suggestions. It installs, executes, edits, and tests. With any LLM you choose. Not autocomplete. Not suggestions. A full autonomous agent that takes actions on your computer. No vendor lock-in. No monthly subscription. Bring your own model. Here's what Goose does: → Works with ANY LLM. Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek, Ollama. Your choice. → Reads and understands your entire codebase → Writes, edits, and refactors code across multiple files → Runs shell commands and installs dependencies → Executes and debugs your code automatically → Extensible through MCP. Connect it to any external tool. → Desktop app, CLI, and web interface. Pick your workflow. → Written in Rust. Fast. Lightweight. No bloat. Here's the wildest part: Block is a $40 billion company. They built Cash App, Square, and TIDAL. They use Goose internally. Then they open sourced the entire thing. This isn't a side project from a random developer. This is production-grade tooling from a company that processes billions in payments. Built for their own engineers. Given to everyone. Claude Code: $200/month. Locked to Claude. GitHub Copilot: $19/month. Locked to GitHub. Cursor: $20/month. Locked to their editor. Goose: Free. Any LLM. Any editor. Any workflow. Forever. 35.3K GitHub stars. 3.3K forks. 4,078 commits. Built by Block. 100% Open Source. Apache 2.0 License.

Nav Toor

391,426 views • 2 months ago

🚨 Calling all developers: Fetch Coder is live. This AI-native coding assistant built for Web3 understands entire codebases in seconds, coordinates multi-file edits that actually work and seamlessly integrates with Agentverse by Fetch.ai for instant agent deployment. Go from idea → prototype → live autonomous agents faster than ever. This is coding built for Web3. Try it now:
3:24

🚨 Calling all developers: Fetch Coder is live. This AI-native coding assistant built for Web3 understands entire codebases in seconds, coordinates multi-file edits that actually work and seamlessly integrates with Agentverse by Fetch.ai for instant agent deployment. Go from idea → prototype → live autonomous agents faster than ever. This is coding built for Web3. Try it now:

Fetch.ai

93,666 views • 8 months ago

The Dev Mode MCP Server is now available in beta. Access Dev Mode data directly in your agentic coding workflow → VS Code with Copilot → Cursor → Windsurf → Claude Code
0:29

The Dev Mode MCP Server is now available in beta. Access Dev Mode data directly in your agentic coding workflow → VS Code with Copilot → Cursor → Windsurf → Claude Code

Figma

252,822 views • 1 year ago

While your team is just getting started vibe coding prototypes, the team at Stripe is vibe coding a full vibe coding platform. Owen Williams ⚡ is a design manager at Stripe who built Protodash - an internal AI prototyping tool that lets designers and PMs spin up real, clickable prototypes in minutes. In this ep he walks through: - why generic AI tools produce "blurple slop" that doesn't match your design system - how he built a full prototyping studio on top of dev boxes with cursor + cc - why more PMs than designers now use Protodash - the design review mode that lets teams ship feedback direct in the app Plus, we talk about getting to the ultimate dream: demos, not memos. ty to our sponsors! 🧠 CESAR - Intelligent automation built for AI 💻 Cursor - The best way to code with AI Full episode on yt:
0:41

While your team is just getting started vibe coding prototypes, the team at Stripe is vibe coding a full vibe coding platform. Owen Williams ⚡ is a design manager at Stripe who built Protodash - an internal AI prototyping tool that lets designers and PMs spin up real, clickable prototypes in minutes. In this ep he walks through: - why generic AI tools produce "blurple slop" that doesn't match your design system - how he built a full prototyping studio on top of dev boxes with cursor + cc - why more PMs than designers now use Protodash - the design review mode that lets teams ship feedback direct in the app Plus, we talk about getting to the ultimate dream: demos, not memos. ty to our sponsors! 🧠 CESAR - Intelligent automation built for AI 💻 Cursor - The best way to code with AI Full episode on yt:

claire vo 🖤

91,861 views • 1 month ago

this is huge news from Cursor, they've pulled of the impossible and turned their ai-wrapper into a in-destructible moat sam altman literally called it cursor's ai agent harness is available for anyone to build on, which means ai models are now a commodity > 1-time install and now anyone can run cursor's agent locally or via cloud. use any model (e.g. gpt 5.5) but with the added cursor harness that makes it 10X better. > its so good that 3 of cursors biggest competitors are embedding it into their products. > now cursor DOESN'T DEPEND on anthropic or openai. their own model (composer 2) competes directly! yesterday sam altman said the ai model and harness are one and the same and today cursor turned their harness into a self-owned moat fucking masterclass (coming from a former cursor / ai wrapper hater)
0:35

this is huge news from Cursor, they've pulled of the impossible and turned their ai-wrapper into a in-destructible moat sam altman literally called it cursor's ai agent harness is available for anyone to build on, which means ai models are now a commodity > 1-time install and now anyone can run cursor's agent locally or via cloud. use any model (e.g. gpt 5.5) but with the added cursor harness that makes it 10X better. > its so good that 3 of cursors biggest competitors are embedding it into their products. > now cursor DOESN'T DEPEND on anthropic or openai. their own model (composer 2) competes directly! yesterday sam altman said the ai model and harness are one and the same and today cursor turned their harness into a self-owned moat fucking masterclass (coming from a former cursor / ai wrapper hater)

Ejaaz

949,400 views • 1 month ago

JENSEN HUANG JUST HELD UP A CHIP THAT KILLS YOUR ENTIRE AI BILL nvidia and microsoft just announced the rtx spark at computex. 1 petaflop of ai on a chip you can hold in one hand. 128gb unified memory. 20 core cpu. full nvidia stack. most people spend $200 a month on chatgpt, claude, midjourney and cursor. that is $2,400 a year renting intelligence from someone else. this chip runs all of it locally for $5 in electricity per month. developers are already offering local ai setups to small businesses for $500 a month. ten clients. $5,000 a month. one chip doing all the work. the people who move on this in 2025 will look very far ahead by 2027. save this now.
2:02

JENSEN HUANG JUST HELD UP A CHIP THAT KILLS YOUR ENTIRE AI BILL nvidia and microsoft just announced the rtx spark at computex. 1 petaflop of ai on a chip you can hold in one hand. 128gb unified memory. 20 core cpu. full nvidia stack. most people spend $200 a month on chatgpt, claude, midjourney and cursor. that is $2,400 a year renting intelligence from someone else. this chip runs all of it locally for $5 in electricity per month. developers are already offering local ai setups to small businesses for $500 a month. ten clients. $5,000 a month. one chip doing all the work. the people who move on this in 2025 will look very far ahead by 2027. save this now.

winkle.

16,657 views • 22 days ago

This Chinese developer runs 9 agents on Claude Code under a GPT-5.5 orchestrator and they close 500 client tasks a month without a single assistant. His client work is closed without him, on a single laptop and only three subscriptions. The entire system lives on one MacBook Pro M4 with 128 GB of memory and subscriptions to Claude Code and GPT-5.5 cost him approximately $300 a month. There is no CRM, no team, no office only a terminal window with 9 parallel streams. The orchestrator works with a simple system prompt: «You are the orchestrator of a client inbox. Classify every incoming email into 4 categories: code, content, analysis, communication. Delegate to the corresponding worker agent. When the result is ready, check it for completeness, send it to the client on my behalf, and mark the task as closed. Do not ask clarifying questions.» And the orchestrator checks the inbox every 30 seconds, classifies fresh emails, and distributes them to 9 worker agents on Claude Code, each of whom is responsible for their own class of tasks. Here is an example of how one of them closes a request to refactor a client's auth module: Task: refactor user-auth module Broke the monolith into 3 files by responsibilities Added unit tests, coverage increased to 87% Renamed 4 functions to camelCase according to the style guide PR is ready for review, link below» And so about 50 cycles a day. By noon 25 tasks are closed, by dinner 50, and by the end of the month 500. On average, it takes about 7 minutes from the appearance of an email in the inbox to sending the result to the client. This is more than what a live team of 6 developers, copywriters and analysts working 8 hours a day closes. This is no longer an agency. This is a workstation where an orchestrator replaces a manager, and 9 worker agents replace the staff. The pipeline goes from inbox to closing 500 times a month without human participation at any step.
1:32

This Chinese developer runs 9 agents on Claude Code under a GPT-5.5 orchestrator and they close 500 client tasks a month without a single assistant. His client work is closed without him, on a single laptop and only three subscriptions. The entire system lives on one MacBook Pro M4 with 128 GB of memory and subscriptions to Claude Code and GPT-5.5 cost him approximately $300 a month. There is no CRM, no team, no office only a terminal window with 9 parallel streams. The orchestrator works with a simple system prompt: «You are the orchestrator of a client inbox. Classify every incoming email into 4 categories: code, content, analysis, communication. Delegate to the corresponding worker agent. When the result is ready, check it for completeness, send it to the client on my behalf, and mark the task as closed. Do not ask clarifying questions.» And the orchestrator checks the inbox every 30 seconds, classifies fresh emails, and distributes them to 9 worker agents on Claude Code, each of whom is responsible for their own class of tasks. Here is an example of how one of them closes a request to refactor a client's auth module: Task: refactor user-auth module Broke the monolith into 3 files by responsibilities Added unit tests, coverage increased to 87% Renamed 4 functions to camelCase according to the style guide PR is ready for review, link below» And so about 50 cycles a day. By noon 25 tasks are closed, by dinner 50, and by the end of the month 500. On average, it takes about 7 minutes from the appearance of an email in the inbox to sending the result to the client. This is more than what a live team of 6 developers, copywriters and analysts working 8 hours a day closes. This is no longer an agency. This is a workstation where an orchestrator replaces a manager, and 9 worker agents replace the staff. The pipeline goes from inbox to closing 500 times a month without human participation at any step.

Blaze

29,917 views • 1 month ago

We just vibe-coded a tool for a law firm. Built entirely with AI. No engineers. No code. It uses a custom model (trained on their SOPs) to review legal documents and auto-save them to the right case file. It’s saving them thousands each month—in software fees and hours of manual work.
1:17

We just vibe-coded a tool for a law firm. Built entirely with AI. No engineers. No code. It uses a custom model (trained on their SOPs) to review legal documents and auto-save them to the right case file. It’s saving them thousands each month—in software fees and hours of manual work.

Jacob Klug

64,407 views • 1 year ago

People still think AI coding is just “faster autocomplete.” Claude Code just became a full team. It remembers your work, runs tasks in parallel, and ships output 2x faster.
6:36

People still think AI coding is just “faster autocomplete.” Claude Code just became a full team. It remembers your work, runs tasks in parallel, and ships output 2x faster.

0xMarioNawfal

50,648 views • 4 months ago

We sat down with Ramp to talk about their internal coding agent, Ramp Inspect, that now writes over half of their merged PRs. - Runs on Modal Sandboxes. - Full dev environments spin up in seconds. - Hundreds of sessions in parallel.
0:35

We sat down with Ramp to talk about their internal coding agent, Ramp Inspect, that now writes over half of their merged PRs. - Runs on Modal Sandboxes. - Full dev environments spin up in seconds. - Hundreds of sessions in parallel.

Modal

32,334 views • 4 months ago

CLAUDE + CURSOR + REPLIT = MAGIC (FULL VIDEO TUTORIAL) You can now write create complex web apps with just english (No copy - paste) using the BEST AI Code generation tool on the market - Cursor. The only problem with cursor for a coding beginner like me, is that its not that easy to deploy web apps. Well, Replit ⠕ makes deploying web apps and creating templates incredibly easy. In this video goes over how to sync Cursor and Replit. And then using our new template we made an AI version of Trello by Atlassian in like 6 or 7 cursor composer prompts. --------------------- In this video: 00:00 - Intro 04:08 - Syncing Cursor and Replit 07:40 - setting up Firebase 10:27 - Using Cursor and Replit to Create Trello Front End 19:41 - Setting up Backend API endpoint (we will make dedicated video on this soon w/template) 21:09 - Adding AI features to Trello!
27:19

CLAUDE + CURSOR + REPLIT = MAGIC (FULL VIDEO TUTORIAL) You can now write create complex web apps with just english (No copy - paste) using the BEST AI Code generation tool on the market - Cursor. The only problem with cursor for a coding beginner like me, is that its not that easy to deploy web apps. Well, Replit ⠕ makes deploying web apps and creating templates incredibly easy. In this video goes over how to sync Cursor and Replit. And then using our new template we made an AI version of Trello by Atlassian in like 6 or 7 cursor composer prompts. --------------------- In this video: 00:00 - Intro 04:08 - Syncing Cursor and Replit 07:40 - setting up Firebase 10:27 - Using Cursor and Replit to Create Trello Front End 19:41 - Setting up Backend API endpoint (we will make dedicated video on this soon w/template) 21:09 - Adding AI features to Trello!

Riley Brown

309,124 views • 1 year ago

Conductor now supports Cursor with Composer 2.5 With native support for 3 harnesses, we now have the holy trinity (Claude, Codex, Cursor) and have fulfilled the prophecy of the 4C's Conductor, Claude, Codex, Cursor
1:23

Conductor now supports Cursor with Composer 2.5 With native support for 3 harnesses, we now have the holy trinity (Claude, Codex, Cursor) and have fulfilled the prophecy of the 4C's Conductor, Claude, Codex, Cursor

matt palmer

27,803 views • 18 days ago

A GERMAN DEVELOPER REPLACED HIS ENTIRE DEV TEAM WITH KIMI K2.6, VISUALIZED EVERYTHING IN OBSIDIAN AND NOW MAKES $80,000/MONTH SOLO 1 trillion parameters, 32 billion activated per token and a SWE-Bench score of 65.8 - Kimi K2.6 reads the entire client codebase, understands the architecture, writes production code and ships for $150-300 in API costs while a traditional agency pays developers $4,800 for the exact same project. 300 parallel agents per run deliver 100+ files simultaneously - search, analysis, coding and writing all in parallel - and Obsidian visualizes the entire knowledge graph in real time while the agents work. A traditional agency with 10-15 people keeps 30% margin after salaries. He keeps 90% - $72,000 in monthly profit with $500 in overhead. By month 10 Kimi handles 80% of the technical work and he manages only strategy and client relationships - while Obsidian maps every project, every client and every agent in one graph that updates itself.
0:33

A GERMAN DEVELOPER REPLACED HIS ENTIRE DEV TEAM WITH KIMI K2.6, VISUALIZED EVERYTHING IN OBSIDIAN AND NOW MAKES $80,000/MONTH SOLO 1 trillion parameters, 32 billion activated per token and a SWE-Bench score of 65.8 - Kimi K2.6 reads the entire client codebase, understands the architecture, writes production code and ships for $150-300 in API costs while a traditional agency pays developers $4,800 for the exact same project. 300 parallel agents per run deliver 100+ files simultaneously - search, analysis, coding and writing all in parallel - and Obsidian visualizes the entire knowledge graph in real time while the agents work. A traditional agency with 10-15 people keeps 30% margin after salaries. He keeps 90% - $72,000 in monthly profit with $500 in overhead. By month 10 Kimi handles 80% of the technical work and he manages only strategy and client relationships - while Obsidian maps every project, every client and every agent in one graph that updates itself.

Noisy

846,932 views • 1 month ago

HOLY SH*T... I just fixed the most annoying part of dev work. This coding agent kills manual tasks in seconds. 7 powerful examples + link to try 👇
0:27

HOLY SH*T... I just fixed the most annoying part of dev work. This coding agent kills manual tasks in seconds. 7 powerful examples + link to try 👇

Robin Delta

25,848 views • 1 year ago

Claude Code is $200/month. GitHub Copilot is $19/month. Jack Dorsey's company just open-sourced a free alternative with 35,000 GitHub stars. It's called Goose. - Works with any LLM — Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek - Reads and edits your entire codebase - Runs shell commands and installs dependencies - Executes and debugs code automatically - Desktop, CLI, and web interface - Written in Rust. No bloat. Block is a $40 billion company. They built it for their own engineers then gave it to everyone.
1:49

Claude Code is $200/month. GitHub Copilot is $19/month. Jack Dorsey's company just open-sourced a free alternative with 35,000 GitHub stars. It's called Goose. - Works with any LLM — Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek - Reads and edits your entire codebase - Runs shell commands and installs dependencies - Executes and debugs code automatically - Desktop, CLI, and web interface - Written in Rust. No bloat. Block is a $40 billion company. They built it for their own engineers then gave it to everyone.

0xMarioNawfal

179,661 views • 2 months ago

It cost me $8 for 4 prompts with GPT 4.5 Preview in Cursor. Is it better than Claude 3.7 for coding? No. I've been casually building really complex features like multi-edit and AI video editing with chat. It's amazing that Claude is still the same price as 3.5 and is included in Cursor pricing.
14:48

It cost me $8 for 4 prompts with GPT 4.5 Preview in Cursor. Is it better than Claude 3.7 for coding? No. I've been casually building really complex features like multi-edit and AI video editing with chat. It's amazing that Claude is still the same price as 3.5 and is included in Cursor pricing.

Meng To

38,134 views • 1 year ago

Here’s how to build a Slack clone with Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Cursor Agent in v0.46. Perfect for *anyone* wanting to pick up AI coding tools. Learn how to build an app 100% from scratch with the newest AI coding workflows. Watch for 1hr+ of agentic coding.
1:12:45

Here’s how to build a Slack clone with Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Cursor Agent in v0.46. Perfect for *anyone* wanting to pick up AI coding tools. Learn how to build an app 100% from scratch with the newest AI coding workflows. Watch for 1hr+ of agentic coding.

Mckay Wrigley

212,434 views • 1 year ago