CZ Suggests Freezing Satoshi's Bitcoin to Address Quantum Threats Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ)CZ 🔶 BNB said in a June 18 interview with Galaxy that if Bitcoin forks in the future to adopt quantum-resistant cryptography, the community could give Satoshi-linked addresses holding about 1 million BTC a 6- to... 12-month migration window. If the coins still do not move, the new protocol should freeze those addresses. CZ said that otherwise, the coins could eventually be claimed by the first person to crack the private keys with quantum computing. He acknowledged there is no perfect solution and said the final decision should be made by the community, potentially through miner signaling.show more

@cz_binance CZ is the main scammer of all crypto. His exchange controls over 40% of the cryptomarket.

@cz_binance NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR COINS getting software update.

@cz_binance CZ @cz_binance , to freeze, or burn whatever, it's a BLATANT violation of private property rights. As a global crypto leader, it's a quite a pity to say so!

@cz_binance This isn't just a quantum computing discussion. It's a trust and governance discussion. The technology may provide the options. The community still has to decide which one it trusts.

@cz_binance i suggest freezing his wealth and put him next to sam

@cz_binance Freezing dormant keys solves one risk by creating another: socializing property rights. If quantum theft becomes possible, a cleaner rule may be “move to a quantum-safe address by block X or coins become unspendable,” not selectively freezing Satoshi.

@cz_binance This isn't just about 'freezing' coins—it's a fundamental challenge to the core principle of Bitcoin's immutability. Creating a mechanism to seize funds, even for security reasons, sets a precedent that the community might eventually regret.

@cz_binance shitcoiner

@cz_binance Silly to think that only crypto would be at risk and not Citibank. Fidelity, JP Morgan, CALSTRS, etc etc Stop framing this as $btc specific issue 🤯

@cz_binance Hell no

@cz_binance Finders keeper's if someone crack's it its there. 'Freezing' what a joke.

@cz_binance freezing satoshi coins? weird flex but quantum talk should stay on code, not politics.

@cz_binance 操他妈的吃屎的赵猴子

@cz_binance Has anyone actually proven quantum can crack those keys?

@cz_binance Сатоши биток бережёт. Копейка рубль бережёт. По аналогии.

@cz_binance Freezing Satoshi's coins sets a dangerous precedent. Vote to seize one address today, what's off limits tomorrow? Quantum resistance is solvable without breaking Bitcoin's core promise.

@cz_binance "Interesting proposal. 🤔 Protecting Bitcoin from future quantum threats makes sense, but freezing Satoshi's coins would likely spark a major debate about decentralization and property rights." ⚡₿

@cz_binance Satoshi’s coins frozen, must be why their guestbook asks how long until they start mining Satoshi’s non-quantum brainstorms.

@cz_binance Cz chưa xạo lol

@cz_binance 🌋

@cz_binance Bitcoin is censorship resistant.. but only if you don't have a shit ton of tokens. Socialist scum @cz

@cz_binance Interesting take from @cz_binance. But a fork-dependent fix means years of coordination. @cellframenet already has multi-scheme PQC (Dilithium, Falcon, SPHINCS+) at the primitive level. No freezing, no fork. $CELL

@cz_binance Berarti btc tidak aman Karena masih bisa di bekukan

@cz_binance another post of the same 3 weeks old interview directly from the wash machine just rebranded

@cz_binance 问问他自己，量子威胁bnb的时候，是不是也冻结他持有的bnb，小丑一个

@cz_binance Bitcoin must die

@cz_binance fearing that his $BTC will be frozen,Satoshi will move them soon.

@cz_binance CZ proposing to freeze Satoshi's coins is the most controversial governance suggestion in Bitcoin's history delivered as a technical solution to a cryptographic problem. The community reaction to this will be more volatile than the price.

@cz_binance CZ stupid

@cz_binance 应该冻结赵狗的比特币应对量子威胁

@cz_binance It's absolutely logic. I bet my ass the original idea of Satoshi was having 20 millions, and he considered the first million as "lost to make the network start." The 21 millions narrative has always be wrong IMHO, it's 20