Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

DADDYYYYYYYYYY

127,696 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The quickest way to waste an opening on immigration is to let the political fight become about something else. The polling makes electoral risk of an abortion debate obvious, a Redbridge survey of 2,010 Australians, published in March 2026, found 62% supported abortion access, another 25% supported access only in limited circumstances, and just 8% opposed it. More importantly for One Nation, the divide exists inside its own support base. Among its voters, 50% supported access and another 34% supported access in limited circumstances. Only 9% opposed it. That means 84% supported abortion access in at least some circumstances. There is also a difference between what a proposal technically does and the political argument it creates. A narrowly framed restriction on sex-selective abortion may be defensible to its supporters on those specific grounds. But they cannot assume the public debate will remain confined to those grounds, especially when figures like Howe are associated with it. When accusations of racism fail to persuade voters concerned about immigration, an argument about women’s rights offers another way to pull those voters back. Why make that argument easier? Why give people who are reconsidering their political loyalties a fresh reason to retreat to their old ones? Even supporters of a narrow abortion reform should recognise the risk. If their proposal becomes associated with a complete ban, the broader controversy can swallow the reform itself. None of this requires abandoning personal convictions. MPs can hold different views and exercise conscience votes, as they have in other parties. Every moral disagreement does not need to become a national platform or a test of whether someone belongs on the right. If the objective is meaningful, lasting immigration reform, then protecting the coalition needed to deliver it should come first. That means keeping attention on immigration and resisting letting activists revive dead issues that divide its own supporters. Political opportunities can disappear much faster than they arrive. Don’t let them turn an opening on immigration into an election about abortion.

Hugo Lennon

32,555 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

For two hundred thousand years, intelligence has been the rarest resource on earth. Locked inside individual human minds. Non‑scalable. Scarce. Every advance in civilization — every leap in science, art, industry, and statecraft — flowed from that scarcity. Artificial intelligence breaks that pattern. It makes intelligence abundant. It makes it cheap. It makes it scale. This is not just another wave of automation or software. It is the industrialization of intelligence itself. When intelligence becomes a utility, it stops being a tool that sits on top of society and starts becoming the foundation of society. It is a transformation as profound as the harnessing of electricity — but on a higher plane. Electricity powered machines. Industrial intelligence powers knowledge. And knowledge shapes everything. This shift will reorder the very structures that underpin nations. The two pillars that define sovereignty — economic strength and security — are being rebuilt on a substrate of machine intelligence. Nations that master this new utility will not simply gain efficiency. They will redefine what prosperity, power, and freedom mean in the 21st century. For me, this is the central story of our time. It is not about the latest app. It is not about hype cycles. It is about the first time in history that intelligence itself — the raw material of progress — has become infinite and industrial. The question is not whether it will transform society. It already is. The question is who will shape that transformation.

Nina Schick

148,960 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад