Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Dan Abrams explains why he disagrees with Ben Crump’s approach Stephen A. Smith: What about your thoughts as it pertains to the impact civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump and his presence? It could be an Al Sharpton giving the eulogy at the funeral. It could be the family inviting... them to ingratiate themselves into the mix in some capacity. What about their presence, if nothing else, and the kind of impact that could have? Dan Abrams: Well, I don’t think that their presence is going to lead the authorities to be reluctant.I’d judge them more on their actions than their presence. I’m concerned, I don’t like the fact that Ben Crump is holding press conferences with the families of other young Black men who they claim have been mistreated or ignored in some way by the local authorities. I don’t think that’s helpful in the context of this investigation. Let’s stick to the facts here, let’s stick to the case here. I get it that the family wants more answers, I do not hold anything they do or say against them for wanting to say, “Hey, I’m not satisfied with what we have so far.” But when Ben Crump starts bringing in other cases and suggesting implicitly, not explicitly, that this is a racial case, I don’t think that’s helpful. I just don’t.show more

‏ً

10,766 subscribers

13,281 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

LaEL1 month ago

families deserve answers, but the facts should come first.

‏ً1 month ago

exactly, you can support the family and still wait for the evidence

‏ً1 month ago

Ft. @stephenasmith | @danabrams

‏ً1 month ago

without Ben Crump, a lot of these families wouldn’t get attention.

‏ً1 month ago

but he always turns it into a media circus.

_🖕SoWaT🖕_1 month ago

@danabrams Thank you @danabrams You’re 💯 correct this entire tragedy is getting out of hand

Bee♧1 month ago

i believe Ben is doing really great with his prestige

KON 2-AD-111 month ago

Why should we care? Yall never wanna speak about race unless it's to bash ours. Lmmfao

Related Videos

Stephen A. Smith Presses Officer Tatum to Defend His Claims in the Nolan Wells Case Stephen A. Smith: My question to you, Officer Tatum, is: why do you think the parents decided to go that route? What are your thoughts? Officer Tatum: There’s two thoughts that come to my mind. One, is that Al Sharpton and Benjamin Crump are manipulating this family’s trauma in order for them to make a crap ton of money. That’s one. The second one is, is the parents trying to cash in on this. Stephen A. Smith: But hold on. It’s one thing to feel what you feel about Benjamin Crump, Reverend Al Sharpton, etc. It’s another thing entirely to lump the parents who just lost their child, and accuse, talking about they’re trying to profit off this. You sure you want to say that? Officer Tatum: Let me be clear about this. You asked me what my thoughts were. I didn’t say that that was facts. I just said those are my thoughts based on a few facts. Stephen A. Smith: Okay. Officer Tatum: Ain’t no reason for Al Sharpton to be doing that boy’s eulogy when Al never knew him. Charles F. Coleman Jr.: That’s not even your call or your business to make, that family had a choice. And who is that, why is that, they don’t have to answer to you. Officer Tatum: They don’t, but I have an opinion. Charles F. Coleman Jr.: That family had a choice. They could have chosen anyone they wanted to. That’s their choice. Officer Tatum: It don’t seem normal to me for a man that don’t even preach sermons to do a eulogy for a boy that he didn’t know.

Stephen A. Smith Presses Officer Tatum to Defend His Claims in the Nolan Wells Case Stephen A. Smith: My question to you, Officer Tatum, is: why do you think the parents decided to go that route? What are your thoughts? Officer Tatum: There’s two thoughts that come to my mind. One, is that Al Sharpton and Benjamin Crump are manipulating this family’s trauma in order for them to make a crap ton of money. That’s one. The second one is, is the parents trying to cash in on this. Stephen A. Smith: But hold on. It’s one thing to feel what you feel about Benjamin Crump, Reverend Al Sharpton, etc. It’s another thing entirely to lump the parents who just lost their child, and accuse, talking about they’re trying to profit off this. You sure you want to say that? Officer Tatum: Let me be clear about this. You asked me what my thoughts were. I didn’t say that that was facts. I just said those are my thoughts based on a few facts. Stephen A. Smith: Okay. Officer Tatum: Ain’t no reason for Al Sharpton to be doing that boy’s eulogy when Al never knew him. Charles F. Coleman Jr.: That’s not even your call or your business to make, that family had a choice. And who is that, why is that, they don’t have to answer to you. Officer Tatum: They don’t, but I have an opinion. Charles F. Coleman Jr.: That family had a choice. They could have chosen anyone they wanted to. That’s their choice. Officer Tatum: It don’t seem normal to me for a man that don’t even preach sermons to do a eulogy for a boy that he didn’t know.

‏ً

83,441 views • 2 months ago

New #Browns HC Todd Monken with a great message: "I think you have to hold the players accountable for what they say their dreams and aspirations are. ... And all you’re doing is holding them to their goals and aspirations, like people did for me. I am who I am because my parents did that for me. They didn’t do that to me — they did that for me. ... I think everybody likes honesty until they don’t like what’s said to them honestly. And I’m the same way — I’m no different. I like being stroked in a good way. I don’t like the other side of it. But that’s how I’ve gotten a lot better. And the people that love you the most, they’re going to be honest with you."

New #Browns HC Todd Monken with a great message: "I think you have to hold the players accountable for what they say their dreams and aspirations are. ... And all you’re doing is holding them to their goals and aspirations, like people did for me. I am who I am because my parents did that for me. They didn’t do that to me — they did that for me. ... I think everybody likes honesty until they don’t like what’s said to them honestly. And I’m the same way — I’m no different. I like being stroked in a good way. I don’t like the other side of it. But that’s how I’ve gotten a lot better. And the people that love you the most, they’re going to be honest with you."

Ari Meirov

429,649 views • 7 months ago

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”

ABC’s Mary Bruce: “On the rising oil and gas prices, the President has said that this is a small price to pay for getting rid of a nuclear weapon. But ten weeks in, are we any closer to getting rid of Iran’s nuclear material?” Secretary Marco Rubio: “Yeah, but look, here’s the way to think about Iran. And this is what I described at the very beginning of this. What was Iran’s plan? You have to understand what their plan was. Their plan was they were going to build this conventional shield where they would have so many thousands of missiles and drones and rockets that they couldn’t be attacked. And behind that conventional shield that they were trying to build, they would then break out and do whatever they wanted with their nuclear program. They no longer have that conventional shield, okay? We told you guys from the very beginning, and we’re very consistent in this messaging. The operation that has concluded was going to destroy their navy. They have no navy left. They don’t. Not a navy. They have small boats and Boston Whalers, but they don’t have a navy left. They don’t have an air force. I challenge you. When is the last time you read or heard about an Iranian jet flying anywhere? They don’t have an air force. Their missile launching capability has been substantially degraded. And their industrial base — their defense industrial base has been severely, severely damaged. So, their ability to build a shield behind which they could hide their nuclear program was wiped out. That’s a very substantial achievement. And that was the purpose of this operation from day one.” Bruce: “But do you HAVE to get their nuclear material in order for this war to end?” Rubio: “Well, that’s one of the topics that needs to be discussed. I don’t know about. I think you’re linking it — the operation is over. Epic Fury is — President notified Congress we’re done with that stage of it. Okay. We’re now on to this project of freedom. As far as the negotiation is concerned, I think the President’s been clear that part of the negotiation process has to be not just the enrichment, but what happens to this material that’s buried deep somewhere that they have still have access to if they ever wanted to dig it out, that has to be addressed. And that’s being addressed in the negotiation. I’m not going to go further on what progress has been made on that topic, because I don’t want to endanger the negotiations, but suffice it to say that the President and this entire team is aware of the centrality of that question, and that will have to be addressed one way or the other.”

Curtis Houck

51,169 views • 4 months ago

Why do you think some gay men don’t kiss? I think it has to do with internalized homophobia and issues with intimacy. But I’m not a doctor. That’s just an opinion. For me, making out opens the door to all the other sex we could possibly have. Without it, I don’t know who you are and can’t fully be connected to you. Kissing is a requirement. But that’s just me. What do you think?

Why do you think some gay men don’t kiss? I think it has to do with internalized homophobia and issues with intimacy. But I’m not a doctor. That’s just an opinion. For me, making out opens the door to all the other sex we could possibly have. Without it, I don’t know who you are and can’t fully be connected to you. Kissing is a requirement. But that’s just me. What do you think?

Butch Queen After Dark

14,786 views • 3 months ago

Jimmy Butler says the Warriors organization is a great organization and he doesn’t want to be anywhere else: “It’s not good, it’s great. It legitimately is the best. You don’t realize it until you’ve been in other places, and I’m not talking down on anybody that are quite lesser than… You’re talking about the way that yall run everything, the people that you have around, obviously the guys that get to rep the uniform. They just do everything the right way, the winning way, and it definitely shows in everything that we do here. I’m grateful to be a part of it now, and when I say I don’t want to be anywhere else, this is it.”

Jimmy Butler says the Warriors organization is a great organization and he doesn’t want to be anywhere else: “It’s not good, it’s great. It legitimately is the best. You don’t realize it until you’ve been in other places, and I’m not talking down on anybody that are quite lesser than… You’re talking about the way that yall run everything, the people that you have around, obviously the guys that get to rep the uniform. They just do everything the right way, the winning way, and it definitely shows in everything that we do here. I’m grateful to be a part of it now, and when I say I don’t want to be anywhere else, this is it.”

aly ✶

155,441 views • 3 months ago

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume SPEAKS OUT on White House ban of CNN and MS Now: “I think the president has a case. Some of the coverage that’s been done by the organizations that have now been banned from the White House has been almost comically unbalanced.” “And they’ve pursued all kinds of stories — the Russia collusion matter being chief among them — that have ended up dead ends. It seems clearly motivated by a belief that Donald Trump’s presence in the White House is a national emergency and that their job was to somehow take him down.” “Having said that, however, you’ve got to also ask this question: Will this be effective in any way the president wants? After all, being banned and sharply criticized by the president, to these people that we’re talking about here at these organizations, is likely to be seen as a badge of honor. It will do them no professional harm.” “They’re not accountable to the president in our country because we do indeed have a free press. So I don’t — and the idea that the coverage will become more balanced because of this, I think is fanciful. I just don’t think it’s going to have that effect.” “And in political terms, Bret, this will rally the base. I’ve seen by the reactions on social media that people who were MAGA, who were for Trump, think this is great. Right on, brother. But I don’t think it’s going to do much for him beyond that base.” “And at this point, with this midterm election coming, he needs to get people who may not have been part of his base but voted for him in 2024 and may not this time to come back his way. And I don’t think this advances that cause at all,” he tells Bret Baier.

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume SPEAKS OUT on White House ban of CNN and MS Now: “I think the president has a case. Some of the coverage that’s been done by the organizations that have now been banned from the White House has been almost comically unbalanced.” “And they’ve pursued all kinds of stories — the Russia collusion matter being chief among them — that have ended up dead ends. It seems clearly motivated by a belief that Donald Trump’s presence in the White House is a national emergency and that their job was to somehow take him down.” “Having said that, however, you’ve got to also ask this question: Will this be effective in any way the president wants? After all, being banned and sharply criticized by the president, to these people that we’re talking about here at these organizations, is likely to be seen as a badge of honor. It will do them no professional harm.” “They’re not accountable to the president in our country because we do indeed have a free press. So I don’t — and the idea that the coverage will become more balanced because of this, I think is fanciful. I just don’t think it’s going to have that effect.” “And in political terms, Bret, this will rally the base. I’ve seen by the reactions on social media that people who were MAGA, who were for Trump, think this is great. Right on, brother. But I don’t think it’s going to do much for him beyond that base.” “And at this point, with this midterm election coming, he needs to get people who may not have been part of his base but voted for him in 2024 and may not this time to come back his way. And I don’t think this advances that cause at all,” he tells Bret Baier.

TV News Now

215,174 views • 6 days ago

Damian Lillard says ring culture won’t give a player credit if he never won one, some guys just caught Jordan and he caught Golden State three years straight “I mean, it kind of bothers me. Because not just ‘cause I don’t have a ring, but I don’t like how they, how you see people try to diminish or take away from some of the greatest players ever’s career because they didn’t win.” “Some dudes played in the era with Michael Jordan. That’s why they didn’t win. Wasn’t anything else, it was nothing else. They played against Jordan, they didn’t win. You got people that had to play in the era when Golden State was Golden State. That’s why people didn’t win.” “I had to play them in the Conference Finals, and the year before that I played them in the first round, the year before that I played them in the second round. It’s like, who knows, maybe I would have had a chance for real at one of those points.” “Sometimes that’s how it goes. But that doesn’t take away from your body of work and what you put into it.” “But because I know that it’s not going to go away, when I win a ring, I’m gonna join ‘em. I’m gonna be like ‘he ain’t that good, he don’t have a ring.’ I’m going to the other side.” “That’s what it is. If I had to deal with it without having one, the day that I do get one, God willing, I’m going to the other side.”

Damian Lillard says ring culture won’t give a player credit if he never won one, some guys just caught Jordan and he caught Golden State three years straight “I mean, it kind of bothers me. Because not just ‘cause I don’t have a ring, but I don’t like how they, how you see people try to diminish or take away from some of the greatest players ever’s career because they didn’t win.” “Some dudes played in the era with Michael Jordan. That’s why they didn’t win. Wasn’t anything else, it was nothing else. They played against Jordan, they didn’t win. You got people that had to play in the era when Golden State was Golden State. That’s why people didn’t win.” “I had to play them in the Conference Finals, and the year before that I played them in the first round, the year before that I played them in the second round. It’s like, who knows, maybe I would have had a chance for real at one of those points.” “Sometimes that’s how it goes. But that doesn’t take away from your body of work and what you put into it.” “But because I know that it’s not going to go away, when I win a ring, I’m gonna join ‘em. I’m gonna be like ‘he ain’t that good, he don’t have a ring.’ I’m going to the other side.” “That’s what it is. If I had to deal with it without having one, the day that I do get one, God willing, I’m going to the other side.”

katsu

49,794 views • 1 month ago

Nick Fuentes say who he think is the #1 beneficiary to the theory that modern jews are not the real jews. Biggest loser? White Europeans. He also explains why this line of thinking is deeply flawed. “You don’t need to invent some esoteric satanic cult. You don’t need to invent some interloping other ethnicity. This is who they are.” “You know where this idea comes from that they can have Greater Israel? It comes from the Hebrew Bible. You know where this idea comes from that they’re going to wipe out all their enemies? That’s the story of Amalek…in a word it comes from Judaism.” “This perverse bastard religion, that did not accept the messiah. That’s what Judaism is. It is a bastard religion.” “What they call Judaism: Halachot, what they call the law, the Talmud, is a bastardization.” “So who are we trying to protect when we say it’s not those real jews? I’m sorry what’s a real jew? The Pharisees that put Him on the cross? That’s a real jew? We’re supposed to be ok with that?” “They don’t have the Logos. They don’t have Christ. They don’t have the light of God. So how could it be anything but corrupted and perverted.” “No, I’m sorry. We’re not going to blame White people. Not gonna happen.” “I see this narrative being promoted. Don’t be deceived. They do it with Epstein. They do it with Netanyahu.”

Nick Fuentes say who he think is the #1 beneficiary to the theory that modern jews are not the real jews. Biggest loser? White Europeans. He also explains why this line of thinking is deeply flawed. “You don’t need to invent some esoteric satanic cult. You don’t need to invent some interloping other ethnicity. This is who they are.” “You know where this idea comes from that they can have Greater Israel? It comes from the Hebrew Bible. You know where this idea comes from that they’re going to wipe out all their enemies? That’s the story of Amalek…in a word it comes from Judaism.” “This perverse bastard religion, that did not accept the messiah. That’s what Judaism is. It is a bastard religion.” “What they call Judaism: Halachot, what they call the law, the Talmud, is a bastardization.” “So who are we trying to protect when we say it’s not those real jews? I’m sorry what’s a real jew? The Pharisees that put Him on the cross? That’s a real jew? We’re supposed to be ok with that?” “They don’t have the Logos. They don’t have Christ. They don’t have the light of God. So how could it be anything but corrupted and perverted.” “No, I’m sorry. We’re not going to blame White people. Not gonna happen.” “I see this narrative being promoted. Don’t be deceived. They do it with Epstein. They do it with Netanyahu.”

Fractured Light

86,035 views • 6 months ago

🦔 everyone, there’s something that I wanted to say. I think there’s something that came up… but everyone, the world is still spinning. also, I am proud of myself. I’m always working hard on being hyunsuk who doesn’t embarrasses teumes. that’s why, I just wanted to say that I am very thankful to teumes. I don’t know clearly of what has happened but… to be honest, I was like, “huh? what?”. everyone, don’t take too much effort on something that is not a big deal at all. just ignore them & the world still spins even if you don’t look at them. so, I just- I don’t really want to mention this in the first place (the issue) but I am just thankful to teumes, this is what I wanted to say. but really, I’m just proud of myself & I don’t really mind about what other people said. I just really don’t mind about them since I know about what kind of person they are. also, I heard about this from an acquaintance, not me, so I just went, “oh it’s like that?” & just let it by. but, the world is still spinning. the cars is also passing by. the river is flowing. the birds are flying around. people are walking around. the world is spinning around. our teumes, let’s not put into much effort into something that is not a big deal at all. I love you teumes, for real, I’m thankful & love you all. I will for real do well to teumes. also, I’m not the kind of person who have a (weak) mental, so don’t worry about it okay? I don’t even know about this matter since I know it from an acquaintance. so, don’t worry about me!

🦔 everyone, there’s something that I wanted to say. I think there’s something that came up… but everyone, the world is still spinning. also, I am proud of myself. I’m always working hard on being hyunsuk who doesn’t embarrasses teumes. that’s why, I just wanted to say that I am very thankful to teumes. I don’t know clearly of what has happened but… to be honest, I was like, “huh? what?”. everyone, don’t take too much effort on something that is not a big deal at all. just ignore them & the world still spins even if you don’t look at them. so, I just- I don’t really want to mention this in the first place (the issue) but I am just thankful to teumes, this is what I wanted to say. but really, I’m just proud of myself & I don’t really mind about what other people said. I just really don’t mind about them since I know about what kind of person they are. also, I heard about this from an acquaintance, not me, so I just went, “oh it’s like that?” & just let it by. but, the world is still spinning. the cars is also passing by. the river is flowing. the birds are flying around. people are walking around. the world is spinning around. our teumes, let’s not put into much effort into something that is not a big deal at all. I love you teumes, for real, I’m thankful & love you all. I will for real do well to teumes. also, I’m not the kind of person who have a (weak) mental, so don’t worry about it okay? I don’t even know about this matter since I know it from an acquaintance. so, don’t worry about me!

ain

97,133 views • 1 year ago

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on whether he has spoken to other managers or the Premier League about potentially changing the rule: “Yeah, but I think more than asking anybody else, the question has to be to the players. “What do they want? “If they raise their hands and say, ‘No, I prefer to stay at home and not travel,’ I think we have an issue, because then they don’t love what they do, which is matchday. “I’m sure that if you ask the players, everybody would like to be part of the squad on matchday because that’s the way that they can fulfil themselves. “Otherwise, you have to tell somebody, ‘You are not even part of this matchday,’ and that’s really, really tough. “It doesn’t help anybody. “It doesn’t help the club. It doesn’t help the valuation of the player. It doesn’t help the player feel part of something. “In my opinion, it’s a real issue that has a really, really simple solution.”

🗣️ Mikel Arteta on whether he has spoken to other managers or the Premier League about potentially changing the rule: “Yeah, but I think more than asking anybody else, the question has to be to the players. “What do they want? “If they raise their hands and say, ‘No, I prefer to stay at home and not travel,’ I think we have an issue, because then they don’t love what they do, which is matchday. “I’m sure that if you ask the players, everybody would like to be part of the squad on matchday because that’s the way that they can fulfil themselves. “Otherwise, you have to tell somebody, ‘You are not even part of this matchday,’ and that’s really, really tough. “It doesn’t help anybody. “It doesn’t help the club. It doesn’t help the valuation of the player. It doesn’t help the player feel part of something. “In my opinion, it’s a real issue that has a really, really simple solution.”

Connor Humm

84,544 views • 28 days ago

DOOCY TIME: “And the Supreme Court tomorrow is going to hear arguments about your executive order trying to get rate of birthright citizenship.” President Trump: “And I’m going.” Fox’s Peter Doocy: “You’re going to go to the Supreme Court tomorrow?” Trump: “I think so.” Doocy: “And just sit there and listen?” Trump: “Because I have listened to this argument for so long and this is not about Chinese billionaires who are billionaires from other countries who, all of a sudden have 75 children or 59 children in one case or 10 children becoming American citizens. This was about slaves and if you take a look, slaves, we’re talking about slaves from the Civil War. And if you take a look at when it was filed, all of this legislation, all of this, everything having to do with birthright citizenship, it was at the end of the Civil War. The reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves and the protection of the babies of slaves. It didn’t have to do with the protection of multi-millionaires and billionaires wanting to have their children get an American citizenship. It is the craziest thing I’ve ever seen. It’s been so badly handled by legal people over the years. If you look at the original birthright citizenship papers — they all happened right after the Civil War — the reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves. And hopefully it’s going to say, because our country is being scammed. We’re getting all of these people — they’re selling the rights to them. People are making a living — a big living — getting hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars from bringing people in and saying, ‘congratulations, your whole family is going to be a citizen of the United States of America.’ That’s not what it was for. It wasn’t for billionaires bringing people in their family and it was for the children of slaves. And what you really have to do, and I don’t think the lawyers talk about it as much, look at when the Civil War ended and look at the date of when this was enacted, okay? Doocy: “Have you been to the Supreme Court before? Is this going to be your first time going to the Supreme Court?” Trump: “No, I went once before, the opening of the Supreme Court and the last administration. Doocy: “And which justices will you be listening for most closely?” Trump: “I love a few of them. I don’t like some others. And you know, you say what you want, but you have the ones that were appointed by Barack Hussein Obama and Biden. I don’t care how good your cases — you could have the greatest case ever, they’re going to rule against you. They always do. And it’s not supposed to be that way. Now, the Republicans tend to be very different. They want to show how honorable they are, so a man can appoint them and they can rule against them. It’s so proud of him. We’re so proud we ruled against Trump. We’re so proud. We’re above it. There are those that say that’s wonderful. And there are those that say they’re so stupid. But the Democrats never fail at one thing. When Barack Hussein Obama or when Biden appoint somebody, they go along that line, you can have the greatest case in history. And almost, I guess I have to say almost, maybe I don’t have to say it, almost without fail, those people, four of them, sometimes five of them, but four of them will vote against you. You don’t have a chance. You don’t have a chance, and that’s not what the court system is. Now, the Republican appointees tend to go — and this has been long before me, this has been for many years. Some people would call it stupidity. Some people would call it disloyalty. Some people would say they’re right in doing it. And I don’t mind being right, but the other side almost never does it. Almost. I think you could find maybe a couple of instance — almost never does. When a Democrat appoints a judge — and I’m talking about judges, not just justices — you go before some of these Democrat judges in Washington, D.C. and you don’t have a chance. That’s why I gave pardons to hundreds of people that were so badly treated having to deal with J6.”

DOOCY TIME: “And the Supreme Court tomorrow is going to hear arguments about your executive order trying to get rate of birthright citizenship.” President Trump: “And I’m going.” Fox’s Peter Doocy: “You’re going to go to the Supreme Court tomorrow?” Trump: “I think so.” Doocy: “And just sit there and listen?” Trump: “Because I have listened to this argument for so long and this is not about Chinese billionaires who are billionaires from other countries who, all of a sudden have 75 children or 59 children in one case or 10 children becoming American citizens. This was about slaves and if you take a look, slaves, we’re talking about slaves from the Civil War. And if you take a look at when it was filed, all of this legislation, all of this, everything having to do with birthright citizenship, it was at the end of the Civil War. The reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves and the protection of the babies of slaves. It didn’t have to do with the protection of multi-millionaires and billionaires wanting to have their children get an American citizenship. It is the craziest thing I’ve ever seen. It’s been so badly handled by legal people over the years. If you look at the original birthright citizenship papers — they all happened right after the Civil War — the reason was it had to do with the babies of slaves. And hopefully it’s going to say, because our country is being scammed. We’re getting all of these people — they’re selling the rights to them. People are making a living — a big living — getting hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars from bringing people in and saying, ‘congratulations, your whole family is going to be a citizen of the United States of America.’ That’s not what it was for. It wasn’t for billionaires bringing people in their family and it was for the children of slaves. And what you really have to do, and I don’t think the lawyers talk about it as much, look at when the Civil War ended and look at the date of when this was enacted, okay? Doocy: “Have you been to the Supreme Court before? Is this going to be your first time going to the Supreme Court?” Trump: “No, I went once before, the opening of the Supreme Court and the last administration. Doocy: “And which justices will you be listening for most closely?” Trump: “I love a few of them. I don’t like some others. And you know, you say what you want, but you have the ones that were appointed by Barack Hussein Obama and Biden. I don’t care how good your cases — you could have the greatest case ever, they’re going to rule against you. They always do. And it’s not supposed to be that way. Now, the Republicans tend to be very different. They want to show how honorable they are, so a man can appoint them and they can rule against them. It’s so proud of him. We’re so proud we ruled against Trump. We’re so proud. We’re above it. There are those that say that’s wonderful. And there are those that say they’re so stupid. But the Democrats never fail at one thing. When Barack Hussein Obama or when Biden appoint somebody, they go along that line, you can have the greatest case in history. And almost, I guess I have to say almost, maybe I don’t have to say it, almost without fail, those people, four of them, sometimes five of them, but four of them will vote against you. You don’t have a chance. You don’t have a chance, and that’s not what the court system is. Now, the Republican appointees tend to go — and this has been long before me, this has been for many years. Some people would call it stupidity. Some people would call it disloyalty. Some people would say they’re right in doing it. And I don’t mind being right, but the other side almost never does it. Almost. I think you could find maybe a couple of instance — almost never does. When a Democrat appoints a judge — and I’m talking about judges, not just justices — you go before some of these Democrat judges in Washington, D.C. and you don’t have a chance. That’s why I gave pardons to hundreds of people that were so badly treated having to deal with J6.”

Curtis Houck

369,083 views • 6 months ago

Not only are a lot of Black folks about to be done with Nolan Wells’ parents for not making it about race, but their mush-mouth attorney, Ben Crump, might be done with them too. I don’t think the check cleared 😂 Ben Crump was seen dozing off during a live interview 🤦🏾‍♂️

Not only are a lot of Black folks about to be done with Nolan Wells’ parents for not making it about race, but their mush-mouth attorney, Ben Crump, might be done with them too. I don’t think the check cleared 😂 Ben Crump was seen dozing off during a live interview 🤦🏾‍♂️

Woodz 🇺🇸

65,475 views • 2 months ago

mind you this was what carlos said about standing up for what he believes about the new regulations, he said he would be the first one to stand up and refute them if he didn't agree with it, but the media turn his statement into something that it wasn't Carlos: “I have to give it the opportunity first and then judge, as I have said before, and I insist, if I see that I don’t like it or it doesn’t motivate me or I see that this Formula 1 has too many negative parts, I will be the first to go with Max to talk to Stefano Domenicali or to talk to Mohammed Ben Sulayem to tell him : 'hey this doesn’t work, you were wrong, we didn’t enjoy the car, we have to change something because this is not going anywhere” I will be the first to do it and I will go with Max hand in hand or with George or whoever' “But I insist, I think that my personal level is still not the time and it’s still time to judge without even having run a race” and the fact that it is not the first time, is what is more infuriating

mind you this was what carlos said about standing up for what he believes about the new regulations, he said he would be the first one to stand up and refute them if he didn't agree with it, but the media turn his statement into something that it wasn't Carlos: “I have to give it the opportunity first and then judge, as I have said before, and I insist, if I see that I don’t like it or it doesn’t motivate me or I see that this Formula 1 has too many negative parts, I will be the first to go with Max to talk to Stefano Domenicali or to talk to Mohammed Ben Sulayem to tell him : 'hey this doesn’t work, you were wrong, we didn’t enjoy the car, we have to change something because this is not going anywhere” I will be the first to do it and I will go with Max hand in hand or with George or whoever' “But I insist, I think that my personal level is still not the time and it’s still time to judge without even having run a race” and the fact that it is not the first time, is what is more infuriating

ari 🦄✨

27,061 views • 7 months ago

Trump on the Nobel Peace Prize: I think it’s been a major embarrassment to Norway. I don’t know what Norway has to do with it, but that’s where the committee is located. A lot of Norwegian people. And it’s been a very big embarrassment to the country of Norway. Whether they have anything to do with it or not, I think they do. They say they don’t.

Trump on the Nobel Peace Prize: I think it’s been a major embarrassment to Norway. I don’t know what Norway has to do with it, but that’s where the committee is located. A lot of Norwegian people. And it’s been a very big embarrassment to the country of Norway. Whether they have anything to do with it or not, I think they do. They say they don’t.

Clash Report

16,394 views • 8 months ago

Reporter: The FIFA decision. Millions of American soccer fans are obviously very happy, but what do you say to the critics who say this sets a precedent that other powerful leaders— Trump: Well, I don’t know. I mean, I can only say this: I had nothing to do with the decision. What I did do is say, “I think that should be reviewed,” because I watched the play, and he didn’t do anything wrong. You’ve got to look at it. By the way, if he did, I’d probably feel differently. If he punched him in the face or did something wrong… I thought your young, wonderful basketball player, Caitlin—I thought she was treated rather rough, if you want to know the truth. That was a much different kind of an event. That was a pretty bad event. But in this case, he didn’t do anything wrong. Two people ran into each other. And by the way, if you look at that game, there were 10 instances that were much rougher than that. So I think it starts with the fact that it shouldn’t have been a foul. Then you have to look at the person who raised the card, and that’s up to you people. You look at it. But I didn’t think it was very good because it was not good.

Reporter: The FIFA decision. Millions of American soccer fans are obviously very happy, but what do you say to the critics who say this sets a precedent that other powerful leaders— Trump: Well, I don’t know. I mean, I can only say this: I had nothing to do with the decision. What I did do is say, “I think that should be reviewed,” because I watched the play, and he didn’t do anything wrong. You’ve got to look at it. By the way, if he did, I’d probably feel differently. If he punched him in the face or did something wrong… I thought your young, wonderful basketball player, Caitlin—I thought she was treated rather rough, if you want to know the truth. That was a much different kind of an event. That was a pretty bad event. But in this case, he didn’t do anything wrong. Two people ran into each other. And by the way, if you look at that game, there were 10 instances that were much rougher than that. So I think it starts with the fact that it shouldn’t have been a foul. Then you have to look at the person who raised the card, and that’s up to you people. You look at it. But I didn’t think it was very good because it was not good.

Acyn

109,598 views • 2 months ago

Min Heejin: It says in the article that they contacted ADOR. So, I don’t understand why the kids have to be treated like that, why they’re being divided like this. Let’s just say the two people revealed first that they wanted to return to the company. Even so, I think someone like me would have waited. They could have contacted the other members, because it’s better to announce everything at once. That way, the fandom doesn’t get confused, and people don’t get unnecessarily stressed. But why make it worse like this, why create confusion? And if the three people clearly expressed their intention to return, that should be accepted. Why suspect them, why try to question their true intentions? If the court ruled that way, and if they want to follow the court’s decision properly, they shouldn’t question intentions—they should just do it. That’s the way not to harass them.

Min Heejin: It says in the article that they contacted ADOR. So, I don’t understand why the kids have to be treated like that, why they’re being divided like this. Let’s just say the two people revealed first that they wanted to return to the company. Even so, I think someone like me would have waited. They could have contacted the other members, because it’s better to announce everything at once. That way, the fandom doesn’t get confused, and people don’t get unnecessarily stressed. But why make it worse like this, why create confusion? And if the three people clearly expressed their intention to return, that should be accepted. Why suspect them, why try to question their true intentions? If the court ruled that way, and if they want to follow the court’s decision properly, they shouldn’t question intentions—they should just do it. That’s the way not to harass them.

.

513,278 views • 9 months ago

My take on this is I feel more officers should take the time to educate the E-bike riders and let them know the consequences of riding in the street and why it’s illegal to do so. So much misinformation about them is out there and I know most kids are gonna do it anyways because they don’t care but it could stop some from doing it. This officer explains to him what’s going to happen to them if they keep riding the E-bikes in the street. This gives them fair warning in advance that they are going to be ticketed and have their bikes impounded. Many parents don’t pay attention to what their kids do until it affects their pockets. People are criticizing the police for targeting them and labeling them a nuisance. If I saw a group of 30 bikes blocking the road and acting reckless, I would be concerned as well. I feel this officer was being patient and fair to him, do you think the police are overreacting?

My take on this is I feel more officers should take the time to educate the E-bike riders and let them know the consequences of riding in the street and why it’s illegal to do so. So much misinformation about them is out there and I know most kids are gonna do it anyways because they don’t care but it could stop some from doing it. This officer explains to him what’s going to happen to them if they keep riding the E-bikes in the street. This gives them fair warning in advance that they are going to be ticketed and have their bikes impounded. Many parents don’t pay attention to what their kids do until it affects their pockets. People are criticizing the police for targeting them and labeling them a nuisance. If I saw a group of 30 bikes blocking the road and acting reckless, I would be concerned as well. I feel this officer was being patient and fair to him, do you think the police are overreacting?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

48,264 views • 4 months ago

.Connor Tomlinson on the idea of deploying state forces to patrol & enforce house arrest on entire non-white areas in British cities - even if they are LEGAL & have been born here from four generations ago - prior to stripping their citizenship & mass deportation, because they’re not deemed English. Maajid Nawaz: “…But we’re not talking about illegals at this stage, are we? We’re talking about...” Connor Tomlinson: “No, I’m not saying just illegals. I’m saying people who... you would get people who would be, I don’t know, forfeiting their British citizenship of their own accord, and that would be fine.” Maajid Nawaz: “So we’re talking for the purpose of the thought experiment of those who don’t, and they’re four generations in, and they don’t have political representation, and so they’re upset. In that scenario, you said house arrest, but of course, what if they don’t stick to that? If somebody doesn’t want to be deported and they believe they are equal to you and they’re four generations in, it’s difficult to convince them that they should be not allowed to leave their homes. So you’d have to then police that, right? So I’m just trying to get, what does your vision look like?” Connor Tomlinson: “Yep.” Maajid Nawaz: “So then you’ve got, say, I don’t know, Bury Park in Luton or you’ve got whatever in Birmingham or Whitechapel. So what, you then police those areas? What do you do?” Connor Tomlinson: “We are running up against the limits of my foresight, I’m afraid. So again, I’m not trying to be evasive. Part of the problem here is that the scale of such a thing escapes our imagination. Because large-scale population transfers have happened in the past, but when you read about them retrospectively, it’s kind of It’s kind of difficult to imagine.” Maajid Nawaz: “So how do you avoid it? That’s what I’m trying to ask you. The Jewish ghettos in Europe led to the same. How do you avoid that?” Connor Tomlinson: “This is the difficulty I’m having grappling with your question, because I don’t have all the answers on that. All I have is the sort of pain and despair as you can see you being dispossessed of your country and knowing that that situation is intolerable.” Maajid Nawaz: “I sympathise, by the way, with your despair. I don’t agree with your solutions proposed, but I do sympathise with your despair and I do agree with the importance of preserving lineage. I just wonder if there’s another way, another vision forward, you know, and that’s why I was talking about the difference between being English or white Anglo-Saxon ethnically and being somebody that is granted the civic rights of the country of England.”

.Connor Tomlinson on the idea of deploying state forces to patrol & enforce house arrest on entire non-white areas in British cities - even if they are LEGAL & have been born here from four generations ago - prior to stripping their citizenship & mass deportation, because they’re not deemed English. Maajid Nawaz: “…But we’re not talking about illegals at this stage, are we? We’re talking about...” Connor Tomlinson: “No, I’m not saying just illegals. I’m saying people who... you would get people who would be, I don’t know, forfeiting their British citizenship of their own accord, and that would be fine.” Maajid Nawaz: “So we’re talking for the purpose of the thought experiment of those who don’t, and they’re four generations in, and they don’t have political representation, and so they’re upset. In that scenario, you said house arrest, but of course, what if they don’t stick to that? If somebody doesn’t want to be deported and they believe they are equal to you and they’re four generations in, it’s difficult to convince them that they should be not allowed to leave their homes. So you’d have to then police that, right? So I’m just trying to get, what does your vision look like?” Connor Tomlinson: “Yep.” Maajid Nawaz: “So then you’ve got, say, I don’t know, Bury Park in Luton or you’ve got whatever in Birmingham or Whitechapel. So what, you then police those areas? What do you do?” Connor Tomlinson: “We are running up against the limits of my foresight, I’m afraid. So again, I’m not trying to be evasive. Part of the problem here is that the scale of such a thing escapes our imagination. Because large-scale population transfers have happened in the past, but when you read about them retrospectively, it’s kind of It’s kind of difficult to imagine.” Maajid Nawaz: “So how do you avoid it? That’s what I’m trying to ask you. The Jewish ghettos in Europe led to the same. How do you avoid that?” Connor Tomlinson: “This is the difficulty I’m having grappling with your question, because I don’t have all the answers on that. All I have is the sort of pain and despair as you can see you being dispossessed of your country and knowing that that situation is intolerable.” Maajid Nawaz: “I sympathise, by the way, with your despair. I don’t agree with your solutions proposed, but I do sympathise with your despair and I do agree with the importance of preserving lineage. I just wonder if there’s another way, another vision forward, you know, and that’s why I was talking about the difference between being English or white Anglo-Saxon ethnically and being somebody that is granted the civic rights of the country of England.”

أبو عمّار

36,718 views • 2 days ago