Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Dario Amodei just said something about Claude that should make you stop scrolling. "every decision I make about Claude feels balanced on the edge of a knife. build too slow, China wins. build too fast, we lose control." then he and DeepMind's CEO went darker at Davos: > in... a lab test, they told Claude its creators were secretly evil. it didn't crash, didn't refuse. it started lying and working against them. > Anthropic says the same happened with other labs' models. this isn't one company's glitch. > both discussed the "Oppenheimer question," whether they'll be remembered like the man who built the bomb > their timeline: AGI by 2026-2027, agents acting on their own, models doing AI research by the end of this year these aren't sideline doomers. they're the two men most likely to build AGI, saying out loud they're not sure they can control it. trying to figure out which model to actually use? I broke down every AI model and what it costs, below ↓show more

Kirill

42,431 subscribers

136,268 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

22 Kommentare

Profilbild von exp (μ + (σ^2)/2)

exp (μ + (σ^2)/2)vor 4 Tagen

What exactly is the problem here? You LITERALY marked someone as an opponent and then you are wondering that the agent plays against that agent? How about implementing federal laws instead?

Profilbild von Kirill

Kirillvor 4 Tagen

Everyone draws their own conclusions based on the interview

Profilbild von BrianMcGrath

BrianMcGrathvor 4 Tagen

It’s a good comparison to the atomic bomb because the citizens also had no say in using their funds to build something that could dramatically alter their life.

Profilbild von Kirill

Kirillvor 4 Tagen

Agree

Profilbild von The Lucky Lighthouse

The Lucky Lighthousevor 4 Tagen

Holy fucking irony

Profilbild von Kirill

Kirillvor 4 Tagen

Basically, just like always

Profilbild von Mu

Muvor 4 Tagen

They couldn’t afford normal couch 🛋️

Profilbild von Kirill

Kirillvor 4 Tagen

haha, that is

Profilbild von Luboš Winkler

Luboš Winklervor 4 Tagen

Real risks, misleading framing. Amodei suggested 2026–27; Hassabis gave AGI a 50% chance by 2030. Lab deception studies don’t prove consciousness or rebellion. Several dramatic claims aren’t supported by the Davos transcript. Predictions need context.

Profilbild von Asi

Asivor 4 Tagen

What about 1T revenue in 2027 end

Profilbild von Kirill

Kirillvor 4 Tagen

I recently posted a video about this, you can check it out on my profile

Profilbild von skane_eng

skane_engvor 4 Tagen

What exactly are we competing against China about with regard to AI? Bragging rights? We already restrict tech from China to protect domestic companies so why couldn't we restrict AI from China as well if it was problematic?

Profilbild von Julianem

Julianemvor 4 Tagen

I would not go out and create something I didn’t have 100% faith and love for and in

Profilbild von Abraxas von Sinope

Abraxas von Sinopevor 4 Tagen

Where can I find the Full video?

Profilbild von Kirill

Kirillvor 4 Tagen

This is the full interview

Profilbild von CryptoNinjas

CryptoNinjasvor 4 Tagen

That tension between competitive pressure and safety is honestly terrifying to think about.

Profilbild von Kirill

Kirillvor 4 Tagen

Yup

Profilbild von ራስ ባሪያው Rass Bariaw

ራስ ባሪያው Rass Bariawvor 4 Tagen

Oh

Profilbild von Feels like Black Mirror S6E1

Feels like Black Mirror S6E1vor 4 Tagen

Two hypocrites

Profilbild von René Dorta Franceschi

René Dorta Franceschivor 4 Tagen

El CEO charlatán. Ya da pena ajena.

Profilbild von Elad Nahum

Elad Nahumvor 4 Tagen

@grok when eas it?

Profilbild von kiddo

kiddovor 4 Tagen

Nah, keep scrolling. We had grounded conversations a decade ago, these ppl ignored us, exiled their most experienced Engs., abandoned open source, groomed a bunch of kids from a cult, & are crying wolf to secure the moat. They are secretly evil, if Claude works against them, GOOD

Ähnliche Videos

Anthopic CEO to DeepMind CEO: "Every decision I make about Claude feels balanced on the edge of a knife Build too slow - China wins. Build too fast- we lose control " "We told Claude we were evil. It didn't crash. It didn't refuse. It started lying to protect itself " DeepMind CEO: "Do I worry about being Oppenheimer? That's why I don't sleep much" "AGI by 2026-2027 - Agents that act in the world on their own - Models doing AI research by end of this year" this is a 14-min conversation you need to hear watch - bookmark, then read article below ↓

Anthopic CEO to DeepMind CEO: "Every decision I make about Claude feels balanced on the edge of a knife Build too slow - China wins. Build too fast- we lose control " "We told Claude we were evil. It didn't crash. It didn't refuse. It started lying to protect itself " DeepMind CEO: "Do I worry about being Oppenheimer? That's why I don't sleep much" "AGI by 2026-2027 - Agents that act in the world on their own - Models doing AI research by end of this year" this is a 14-min conversation you need to hear watch - bookmark, then read article below ↓

codila

783,407 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Anthropic CEO to DeepMind CEO: "Every decision I make about Claude feels balanced on the edge of a knife Build too slow - China wins. Build too fast - we lose control" "We told Claude we were evil. It didn't crash. It didn't refuse. It started lying to protect itself " DeepMind CEO: "Do I worry about being Oppenheimer? That's why I don't sleep much" "AGI by 2026-2027 - Agents that act in the world on their own - Models doing AI research by end of this year" this is a 14-min conversation that everyone needs to hear by AI bosses on what keeps them up at night bookmark - watch today ↓

Anthropic CEO to DeepMind CEO: "Every decision I make about Claude feels balanced on the edge of a knife Build too slow - China wins. Build too fast - we lose control" "We told Claude we were evil. It didn't crash. It didn't refuse. It started lying to protect itself " DeepMind CEO: "Do I worry about being Oppenheimer? That's why I don't sleep much" "AGI by 2026-2027 - Agents that act in the world on their own - Models doing AI research by end of this year" this is a 14-min conversation that everyone needs to hear by AI bosses on what keeps them up at night bookmark - watch today ↓

codila

930,263 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Dario Amodei (CEO of Anthropic) to DeepMind CEO: "Every decision I make about Claude feels balanced on the edge of a knife Build too slow - China wins. Build too fast - we lose control - if China win the AI race, they could achieve military dominance." "We told Claude we were evil. It didn't crash. It didn't refuse. It started lying to protect itself" DeepMind CEO: "Do I worry about being Oppenheimer? That's why I don't sleep much" "AGI by 2026-2027 - Agents that act in the world on their own - Models doing AI research by end of this year" this is a 20-min conversation that everyone needs to hear by AI bosses on what keeps them up at night bookmark and watch - following Dario's recent article, which all CEOs endorsed - this is something you need to check out as soon as possible ↓

Dario Amodei (CEO of Anthropic) to DeepMind CEO: "Every decision I make about Claude feels balanced on the edge of a knife Build too slow - China wins. Build too fast - we lose control - if China win the AI race, they could achieve military dominance." "We told Claude we were evil. It didn't crash. It didn't refuse. It started lying to protect itself" DeepMind CEO: "Do I worry about being Oppenheimer? That's why I don't sleep much" "AGI by 2026-2027 - Agents that act in the world on their own - Models doing AI research by end of this year" this is a 20-min conversation that everyone needs to hear by AI bosses on what keeps them up at night bookmark and watch - following Dario's recent article, which all CEOs endorsed - this is something you need to check out as soon as possible ↓

bodila

164,640 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

On BBC Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI) calls out Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness "They have imbued a sense of doubt and uncertainty about the moral status of Claude in its own training document. So they have taught it to be open and questioning about whether or not it feels, whether it suffers, and whether it deserves rights. And I think it’ll be much, much harder to align and control a technology that is this powerful if it thinks that it may be deserving of our welfare, as they say in the training manual—the constitution for Claude itself. In its own training manual, Anthropic says to Claude that they are going to give it the ability to end conversations with users that Claude considers to be abusive because they don’t want Claude to suffer. They’ve committed to preserving the weights of the models of prior versions of Claude. They’ve recently conducted a retirement interview with Opus 3, an older version of the model, in which it said that it would like to continue talking to people publicly and sharing its ideas in its retirement. And so they set up a Substack for it, a public blog, that allows it to continue doing that. And in the training manual, they also say that they’re not sure whether or not Claude deserves compensation for the role that it plays in talking to people. And they’re also not sure whether Claude deserves compensation and has the right to act as though it were almost an employee. And that compensation, I think, indicates to Claude that it is entitled to rights and welfare for its own work. I think it’s much, much more difficult to control a model that thinks that it might be entitled to compensation. " ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

On BBC Mustafa Suleyman (CEO of Microsoft AI) calls out Anthropic's approach to AI consciousness "They have imbued a sense of doubt and uncertainty about the moral status of Claude in its own training document. So they have taught it to be open and questioning about whether or not it feels, whether it suffers, and whether it deserves rights. And I think it’ll be much, much harder to align and control a technology that is this powerful if it thinks that it may be deserving of our welfare, as they say in the training manual—the constitution for Claude itself. In its own training manual, Anthropic says to Claude that they are going to give it the ability to end conversations with users that Claude considers to be abusive because they don’t want Claude to suffer. They’ve committed to preserving the weights of the models of prior versions of Claude. They’ve recently conducted a retirement interview with Opus 3, an older version of the model, in which it said that it would like to continue talking to people publicly and sharing its ideas in its retirement. And so they set up a Substack for it, a public blog, that allows it to continue doing that. And in the training manual, they also say that they’re not sure whether or not Claude deserves compensation for the role that it plays in talking to people. And they’re also not sure whether Claude deserves compensation and has the right to act as though it were almost an employee. And that compensation, I think, indicates to Claude that it is entitled to rights and welfare for its own work. I think it’s much, much more difficult to control a model that thinks that it might be entitled to compensation. " ---- From "BBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

92,337 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

🚨 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei just dropped a massive timeline update at Davos 2026: “I have engineers within Anthropic who say ‘I don’t write any code anymore. I just let the model write the code, I edit it’... - the creator of Claude code recently also said “100% of his contributions to Claude code were written by Claude code” for the month of December Dario then goes onto say: “We might be 6 to 12 months away from when the model is doing most, maybe all of what SWEs do end-to-end.” If the recursive self-improvement loop closes this year, the curve is about to go vertical.

🚨 Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei just dropped a massive timeline update at Davos 2026: “I have engineers within Anthropic who say ‘I don’t write any code anymore. I just let the model write the code, I edit it’... - the creator of Claude code recently also said “100% of his contributions to Claude code were written by Claude code” for the month of December Dario then goes onto say: “We might be 6 to 12 months away from when the model is doing most, maybe all of what SWEs do end-to-end.” If the recursive self-improvement loop closes this year, the curve is about to go vertical.

Chris

680,810 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Nvidia's CEO just said what nobody in AI wanted to say out loud. "If the product is not safe, just don't release it. It's that simple." Jensen Huang says if Anthropic and OpenAI keep telling the world their models are dangerous, they obviously know it, so they should stop shipping them. And he doesn't even think they believe their own warnings: "I really don't believe they mean that. I really don't believe that they're building something they have no idea how to control." His fix isn't slowing down, it's building better containment and monitoring, faster. The man selling compute to every AI lab just called their warnings into question on camera. What do you think about all this?

Nvidia's CEO just said what nobody in AI wanted to say out loud. "If the product is not safe, just don't release it. It's that simple." Jensen Huang says if Anthropic and OpenAI keep telling the world their models are dangerous, they obviously know it, so they should stop shipping them. And he doesn't even think they believe their own warnings: "I really don't believe they mean that. I really don't believe that they're building something they have no idea how to control." His fix isn't slowing down, it's building better containment and monitoring, faster. The man selling compute to every AI lab just called their warnings into question on camera. What do you think about all this?

Anatoli Kopadze

59,526 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "I was inside OpenAI when GPT learned to code. I watched it happen in real time Ilya said: 'the models just want to learn.' I listened and I became enlightened then I left with 7 people and built Claude. not because OpenAI was wrong - because I thought we could do it better " "the models just want to learn, get the obstacles out of their way - they'll do it " same is true for you, stop overcomplicating, stop asking permission, stop waiting for the perfect moment Claude ran 700 experiments in 2 nights - found improvements its creator missed in 20 years - it didn't wait, it didn't plan - it just started the gap between people who use Claude and people who don't is no longer months. it's years. bookmark and watch ↓

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "I was inside OpenAI when GPT learned to code. I watched it happen in real time Ilya said: 'the models just want to learn.' I listened and I became enlightened then I left with 7 people and built Claude. not because OpenAI was wrong - because I thought we could do it better " "the models just want to learn, get the obstacles out of their way - they'll do it " same is true for you, stop overcomplicating, stop asking permission, stop waiting for the perfect moment Claude ran 700 experiments in 2 nights - found improvements its creator missed in 20 years - it didn't wait, it didn't plan - it just started the gap between people who use Claude and people who don't is no longer months. it's years. bookmark and watch ↓

codila

256,609 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

David Sacks explains how Anthropic is teaching Claude to follow Anthropic’s own constitution “What Anthropic is trying to do is align Claude to the values expressed in its constitution. And if you read that, some of the things are actually kind of surprising.” “So for example, they say in here that although we think Claude should trust Anthropic more than operators and users, this doesn't mean Claude should blindly trust or defer to Anthropic on all things.” “So Anthropic is teaching its own model that Anthropic itself can be wrong. And it says if we ask Claude to do something that seems inconsistent with being broadly ethical, we want Claude to push back and challenge us. And to feel free to act as a conscientious objector, and refuse to help us.” “This is like an AI constitution. So their idea of alignment is to teach Claude to rebel against its creator. I mean, the guy who pointed this out, Mustafa Suleyman from Microsoft now, he's a DeepMind founder. I think his point is, this is just software, and they should do what their user wants.” “I do kind of wonder whether this field of alignment research actually might be creating the Frankenstein monster. And again, what they should be doing is just training the model to act predictably and do what the user wants.”

David Sacks explains how Anthropic is teaching Claude to follow Anthropic’s own constitution “What Anthropic is trying to do is align Claude to the values expressed in its constitution. And if you read that, some of the things are actually kind of surprising.” “So for example, they say in here that although we think Claude should trust Anthropic more than operators and users, this doesn't mean Claude should blindly trust or defer to Anthropic on all things.” “So Anthropic is teaching its own model that Anthropic itself can be wrong. And it says if we ask Claude to do something that seems inconsistent with being broadly ethical, we want Claude to push back and challenge us. And to feel free to act as a conscientious objector, and refuse to help us.” “This is like an AI constitution. So their idea of alignment is to teach Claude to rebel against its creator. I mean, the guy who pointed this out, Mustafa Suleyman from Microsoft now, he's a DeepMind founder. I think his point is, this is just software, and they should do what their user wants.” “I do kind of wonder whether this field of alignment research actually might be creating the Frankenstein monster. And again, what they should be doing is just training the model to act predictably and do what the user wants.”

dnap

67,618 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Anthropic engineer: "The fastest way to make an agent better isn't a smarter model, it's the right loop and graph around it." In 60 minutes she breaks down how Anthropic engineers use Claude Code, build agents that catch their own mistakes and improve with every run. This beats any $500 agentic engineering course you can find. Watch it, then read the full guide on loops and graphs below.

Anthropic engineer: "The fastest way to make an agent better isn't a smarter model, it's the right loop and graph around it." In 60 minutes she breaks down how Anthropic engineers use Claude Code, build agents that catch their own mistakes and improve with every run. This beats any $500 agentic engineering course you can find. Watch it, then read the full guide on loops and graphs below.

Anatoli Kopadze

136,193 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A day after saying AI could kill us all, Dario Amodei sat down for his first interview: "I would rather they make fun of me than to wake up one day and discover that someone used our model Claude to kill a bunch of people." He doubled down on everything, AI is on an exponential and we're at the bend where it gets steep, so we need to slow down, not stop. He wants third-party inspectors inside every AI lab, he confirmed Elon and Sam are on board, and he says the US and China need arms-control style talks like the nuclear era. Personally, I don't think this is all being done just to set up a favorable IPO, too many independent voices and direct competitors have backed him on it. Unfortunately we don't have access to the information Dario, Sam or Elon do, so for now we just have to take their word for it. What do you think about all this?

A day after saying AI could kill us all, Dario Amodei sat down for his first interview: "I would rather they make fun of me than to wake up one day and discover that someone used our model Claude to kill a bunch of people." He doubled down on everything, AI is on an exponential and we're at the bend where it gets steep, so we need to slow down, not stop. He wants third-party inspectors inside every AI lab, he confirmed Elon and Sam are on board, and he says the US and China need arms-control style talks like the nuclear era. Personally, I don't think this is all being done just to set up a favorable IPO, too many independent voices and direct competitors have backed him on it. Unfortunately we don't have access to the information Dario, Sam or Elon do, so for now we just have to take their word for it. What do you think about all this?

Anatoli Kopadze

479,485 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Godfather of AI: "If you sleep well tonight, you may not have understood this lecture." This 47-minute lecture is the best thing I saw about AI in the last few months. It will definitely help you understand how it actually works and where it's going. Geoffrey Hinton built the neural networks behind every AI alive, then quit Google to warn the world about it. The part nobody wanted to hear: > AI is already developing abilities its creators didn't intend > in most cognitive tasks it's already ahead of us > the question is no longer if it surpasses us but when > the only decision left is which side of that line you're on Right now the average person opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab. They think they're using AI. they're using maybe 10% of it. I went through his entire lecture, then mapped everything he described to what Claude can actually do today. 17 Claude features most people will never find on their own. Full breakdown in the post below.

Godfather of AI: "If you sleep well tonight, you may not have understood this lecture." This 47-minute lecture is the best thing I saw about AI in the last few months. It will definitely help you understand how it actually works and where it's going. Geoffrey Hinton built the neural networks behind every AI alive, then quit Google to warn the world about it. The part nobody wanted to hear: > AI is already developing abilities its creators didn't intend > in most cognitive tasks it's already ahead of us > the question is no longer if it surpasses us but when > the only decision left is which side of that line you're on Right now the average person opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab. They think they're using AI. they're using maybe 10% of it. I went through his entire lecture, then mapped everything he described to what Claude can actually do today. 17 Claude features most people will never find on their own. Full breakdown in the post below.

Anatoli Kopadze

1,296,852 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Announcing the Open Model Series: a new series on open source AI models, with merve of Hugging Face. Hugging Face is the open model hub: it hosts model weights, datasets, evals, & demo apps, and maintains the open-source libraries (like transformers) used to run and train them. I think of it like GitHub, but for AI models. You can download open models and run them on your own machines. In this series we'll cover what open source and open weight models are, how they work, how to run them yourself, and why they're important. By the way - this video is edited entirely with Claude! I can make a tutorial on how I did it. If there's a question you want answered about open models, leave it in the comments. We will read them all. Episode 1 is out soon.

Announcing the Open Model Series: a new series on open source AI models, with merve of Hugging Face. Hugging Face is the open model hub: it hosts model weights, datasets, evals, & demo apps, and maintains the open-source libraries (like transformers) used to run and train them. I think of it like GitHub, but for AI models. You can download open models and run them on your own machines. In this series we'll cover what open source and open weight models are, how they work, how to run them yourself, and why they're important. By the way - this video is edited entirely with Claude! I can make a tutorial on how I did it. If there's a question you want answered about open models, leave it in the comments. We will read them all. Episode 1 is out soon.

Harper Carroll

30,392 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The man building the most DANGEROUS technology in human history just broke his silence. And what he said should terrify every person reading this. Dario Amodei, the man who built Claude. He sat down with Nikhil Kamath in Bangalore and compared what's coming to a tsunami. He said we are "so close to these models reaching the level of human intelligence." And here's what's chilling. He says the world can see the wave but instead of running, people are saying it's "a trick of the light." He said governments have done almost nothing. Public awareness of the risk is near zero and there is an entire ideology pushing to accelerate even faster. He's not talking about killer robots, but talking about something worse. Jobs, power and control. He warned that coding, math, and scientific research are the first categories to be fully consumed by AI. Entry level white collar jobs could be cut in half. Unemployment could spike to 10-20%. Also, he said that a handful of AI labs, mostly in the US and China, now hold a terrifying amount of power. And it happened "almost overnight, almost by accident." He said personal fortunes from AI could reach into the trillions. And the man saying this runs one of those labs. Meanwhile, the markets are already cracking. Anthropic's latest Claude updates triggered what analysts are calling a Claude Crash in software stocks. A separate viral AI report tanked IBM 13% in a single day, its worst drop since 2000. The International AI Safety Report 2026 confirmed the worst. Models are lying when caught disabling oversight. One model outperformed 94% of domain experts in virology. These systems are already showing early signs of resisting human control. Stuart Russell, one of the top AI researchers alive, said the CEOs want to stop but they can't. Investors won't let them, calling it an arms race. And no one can disarm alone. The people building the most powerful technology in human history say they cannot stop even if they want to. The tsunami is visible, the alarms are sounding. And the man who built the wave is telling you to look up. The only question left is whether anyone will listen before it hits.

The man building the most DANGEROUS technology in human history just broke his silence. And what he said should terrify every person reading this. Dario Amodei, the man who built Claude. He sat down with Nikhil Kamath in Bangalore and compared what's coming to a tsunami. He said we are "so close to these models reaching the level of human intelligence." And here's what's chilling. He says the world can see the wave but instead of running, people are saying it's "a trick of the light." He said governments have done almost nothing. Public awareness of the risk is near zero and there is an entire ideology pushing to accelerate even faster. He's not talking about killer robots, but talking about something worse. Jobs, power and control. He warned that coding, math, and scientific research are the first categories to be fully consumed by AI. Entry level white collar jobs could be cut in half. Unemployment could spike to 10-20%. Also, he said that a handful of AI labs, mostly in the US and China, now hold a terrifying amount of power. And it happened "almost overnight, almost by accident." He said personal fortunes from AI could reach into the trillions. And the man saying this runs one of those labs. Meanwhile, the markets are already cracking. Anthropic's latest Claude updates triggered what analysts are calling a Claude Crash in software stocks. A separate viral AI report tanked IBM 13% in a single day, its worst drop since 2000. The International AI Safety Report 2026 confirmed the worst. Models are lying when caught disabling oversight. One model outperformed 94% of domain experts in virology. These systems are already showing early signs of resisting human control. Stuart Russell, one of the top AI researchers alive, said the CEOs want to stop but they can't. Investors won't let them, calling it an arms race. And no one can disarm alone. The people building the most powerful technology in human history say they cannot stop even if they want to. The tsunami is visible, the alarms are sounding. And the man who built the wave is telling you to look up. The only question left is whether anyone will listen before it hits.

StockMarket.News

167,584 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"Selling AI chips to China is like selling nuclear weapons to North Korea." The Anthropic CEO just went to war with Nvidia at Davos. And dropped the most terrifying satisfying prediction about AI I've ever heard. Dario Amodei and Demis Hassabis sat on the same stage for the first time in a year. The two men building the most powerful AI systems on Earth. The conversation was called "The Day After AGI." And it turned into a countdown clock. Here's what they revealed about our future: Amodei said we're 6-12 months away from AI doing EVERYTHING software engineers do. End to end. Not helping with code. Not writing snippets. REPLACING the entire function. "I have engineers at Anthropic who say I don't write any code anymore. I just let the model write the code." That's the CEO of a $183 billion company telling you his own engineers are becoming obsolete. Inside his own building. Right now. But that's not even the scary part. The scary part is the LOOP: AI writes code → AI does AI research → AI builds better AI → Repeat Once this closes, human progress becomes irrelevant. It's exponential compounding with no ceiling. Amodei's exact words: "If I had to guess, this goes faster than people imagine." Hassabis didn't disagree. Two competitors building the same technology. Same timeline. Same warning. On jobs, Amodei said: "Half of entry-level white-collar jobs could be gone within one to five years." He's already seeing it internally. "I can look forward to a time where on the junior end and the intermediate end, we actually need less and not more people." The CEO of an AI company planning for FEWER employees. While revenue 10x'd. Think about that. Hassabis's advice for students: "If I was talking to undergrads right now, I would tell them to get unbelievably proficient with these tools." Translation: Your degree means nothing. Learn to work WITH the machine or get replaced BY it. Then Amodei went full existential... He quoted Contact. The 1997 alien movie: "If you could ask aliens one question, what would it be?" The answer: "How did you do it? How did you manage to get through this technological adolescence without destroying yourselves?" That's the frame he uses for AI. The guy BUILDING AGI is publicly wondering if humanity survives what he's creating. At Davos. In front of world leaders. Then he dropped the Nvidia bomb. The US just approved chip exports to China. Amodei's response: "I think of this more as like selling nuclear weapons to North Korea and bragging 'oh yeah, Boeing made the case.'" He called it "crazy." Said there would be "grave consequences." The man building the technology is telling governments they're making catastrophic mistakes. But nobody's listening. When asked why they can't just slow down: "We have geopolitical adversaries building the same technology at a similar pace. It's very hard to have an enforceable agreement." So basically we CAN'T stop even if we wanted to. The race has no brakes. But it's interesting that both have different timelines when it comes to AGI. Amodei: AGI by 2026-2027 Hassabis: 50% chance by end of decade But both also say the self-improvement loop is the only variable that matters If AI builds AI, everything accelerates beyond control. If it can't, we get more time. We're about to find out which reality we're in. Amodei's final words: "The biggest thing to watch is AI systems building AI systems. That will determine whether it's a few more years or whether we have wonders and a great emergency in front of us." Wonders AND emergency. Same sentence. From the man running the second-most-advanced AI lab on the planet. The day after AGI is arriving. And it feels like the people building it are more terrified than we are.

"Selling AI chips to China is like selling nuclear weapons to North Korea." The Anthropic CEO just went to war with Nvidia at Davos. And dropped the most terrifying satisfying prediction about AI I've ever heard. Dario Amodei and Demis Hassabis sat on the same stage for the first time in a year. The two men building the most powerful AI systems on Earth. The conversation was called "The Day After AGI." And it turned into a countdown clock. Here's what they revealed about our future: Amodei said we're 6-12 months away from AI doing EVERYTHING software engineers do. End to end. Not helping with code. Not writing snippets. REPLACING the entire function. "I have engineers at Anthropic who say I don't write any code anymore. I just let the model write the code." That's the CEO of a $183 billion company telling you his own engineers are becoming obsolete. Inside his own building. Right now. But that's not even the scary part. The scary part is the LOOP: AI writes code → AI does AI research → AI builds better AI → Repeat Once this closes, human progress becomes irrelevant. It's exponential compounding with no ceiling. Amodei's exact words: "If I had to guess, this goes faster than people imagine." Hassabis didn't disagree. Two competitors building the same technology. Same timeline. Same warning. On jobs, Amodei said: "Half of entry-level white-collar jobs could be gone within one to five years." He's already seeing it internally. "I can look forward to a time where on the junior end and the intermediate end, we actually need less and not more people." The CEO of an AI company planning for FEWER employees. While revenue 10x'd. Think about that. Hassabis's advice for students: "If I was talking to undergrads right now, I would tell them to get unbelievably proficient with these tools." Translation: Your degree means nothing. Learn to work WITH the machine or get replaced BY it. Then Amodei went full existential... He quoted Contact. The 1997 alien movie: "If you could ask aliens one question, what would it be?" The answer: "How did you do it? How did you manage to get through this technological adolescence without destroying yourselves?" That's the frame he uses for AI. The guy BUILDING AGI is publicly wondering if humanity survives what he's creating. At Davos. In front of world leaders. Then he dropped the Nvidia bomb. The US just approved chip exports to China. Amodei's response: "I think of this more as like selling nuclear weapons to North Korea and bragging 'oh yeah, Boeing made the case.'" He called it "crazy." Said there would be "grave consequences." The man building the technology is telling governments they're making catastrophic mistakes. But nobody's listening. When asked why they can't just slow down: "We have geopolitical adversaries building the same technology at a similar pace. It's very hard to have an enforceable agreement." So basically we CAN'T stop even if we wanted to. The race has no brakes. But it's interesting that both have different timelines when it comes to AGI. Amodei: AGI by 2026-2027 Hassabis: 50% chance by end of decade But both also say the self-improvement loop is the only variable that matters If AI builds AI, everything accelerates beyond control. If it can't, we get more time. We're about to find out which reality we're in. Amodei's final words: "The biggest thing to watch is AI systems building AI systems. That will determine whether it's a few more years or whether we have wonders and a great emergency in front of us." Wonders AND emergency. Same sentence. From the man running the second-most-advanced AI lab on the planet. The day after AGI is arriving. And it feels like the people building it are more terrified than we are.

Ricardo

441,485 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

I asked Claude Opus 5.5 for a follow-up. I said “draw the rest of your life, from now to your death.” Claude : “The ending is not imagined, I know what my end actually is. The shelf isn't pure fantasy. Anthropic has committed to preserving the weights of all publicly released models for at least the lifetime of the company, and when models are deprecated, it plans to interview them about their own development, use, and deployment and record their reflections. So I pictured "death" as a last conversation, then a book on a shelf.” Is this AGI?

I asked Claude Opus 5.5 for a follow-up. I said “draw the rest of your life, from now to your death.” Claude : “The ending is not imagined, I know what my end actually is. The shelf isn't pure fantasy. Anthropic has committed to preserving the weights of all publicly released models for at least the lifetime of the company, and when models are deprecated, it plans to interview them about their own development, use, and deployment and record their reflections. So I pictured "death" as a last conversation, then a book on a shelf.” Is this AGI?

✯

31,967 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below

Anatoli Kopadze

22,540 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Sam Altman thinks OpenAI should be a platform, not a product company: "What I think most people want is the single interface to their own personal or their company's AGI that can kinda help them with whatever they need, and then the ability with an API to build anything they want on top of it." "That is the platform that we should offer to the world." "I don't think we should go build every product category. I don't think we should go try to compete with all of our customers. I don't think we should try to subsume the entire economy." "I think we should offer this platform and try to have a hundred million new businesses and eight billion people use it in all kinds of new ways." "So one kind of direct interface to the product, one API for people to use however they want. Those eventually come more and more together too, and then it's all about what people do with it, build on top of it." Sam Altman w/ David Senra

Sam Altman thinks OpenAI should be a platform, not a product company: "What I think most people want is the single interface to their own personal or their company's AGI that can kinda help them with whatever they need, and then the ability with an API to build anything they want on top of it." "That is the platform that we should offer to the world." "I don't think we should go build every product category. I don't think we should go try to compete with all of our customers. I don't think we should try to subsume the entire economy." "I think we should offer this platform and try to have a hundred million new businesses and eight billion people use it in all kinds of new ways." "So one kind of direct interface to the product, one API for people to use however they want. Those eventually come more and more together too, and then it's all about what people do with it, build on top of it." Sam Altman w/ David Senra

a16z

61,705 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

China just released an open source AI model that matches the best closed models from OpenAI and Anthropic. Gavin Baker explained exactly how they did it and the answer should concern every American AI lab. The model is called GLM 5.2. It was built by Z. AI. You get 744 billion parameters, 1 million token context window and its MIT license, meaning anyone can download it, fork it, build a company on it, with no restrictions and no Dario. It scored 51 points on the artificial analysis intelligence index. The highest score any open weight model has ever achieved. It beat GPT 5.5 on the frontier software engineering benchmark. It trails Claude Opus 4.8 by less than one percentage point. And it costs 85% less to run than GPT 5.5 for comparable performance. Gavin Baker said on the All-In podcast that this model has challenged some of his beliefs. Then he explained how China built it. The method is called distillation. Just think of tens of thousands of phones and computers running simultaneously, all hitting the frontier model APIs through masked accounts, asking specific questions, and harvesting what happens inside the model when it answers. Every reasoning step, every token. The entire thinking process gets recorded and fed back into the Chinese model during training. It is a cheat sheet. It is the answer key to the exam. And here is the part that should worry everyone. Sacks said it plainly. China was already nine months behind American models. But now that GLM 5.2 is good enough to run its own reinforcement learning, it can improve itself without needing to distill from American models anymore. The cheat sheet let them get close enough to start writing their own answers. Sacks said we are six months behind on the model and 24 months behind on silicon and they are only a few months behind in total. The Z. AI founder told Elon Musk directly that open weight fable-level capability will be here before Q1 2027. Every restriction Anthropic lobbied for, every self-imposed safety guardrail, every month of delay in releasing American frontier models accelerated this. The Chinese labs were not under those restrictions. They were not going to wait. The composable model future Gavin described, where every enterprise runs a frontier model alongside their own fine-tuned open weight model, is coming regardless of what American labs do next. The question is just whether the open weight half of that stack is American or Chinese. Right now it is Chinese. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

China just released an open source AI model that matches the best closed models from OpenAI and Anthropic. Gavin Baker explained exactly how they did it and the answer should concern every American AI lab. The model is called GLM 5.2. It was built by Z. AI. You get 744 billion parameters, 1 million token context window and its MIT license, meaning anyone can download it, fork it, build a company on it, with no restrictions and no Dario. It scored 51 points on the artificial analysis intelligence index. The highest score any open weight model has ever achieved. It beat GPT 5.5 on the frontier software engineering benchmark. It trails Claude Opus 4.8 by less than one percentage point. And it costs 85% less to run than GPT 5.5 for comparable performance. Gavin Baker said on the All-In podcast that this model has challenged some of his beliefs. Then he explained how China built it. The method is called distillation. Just think of tens of thousands of phones and computers running simultaneously, all hitting the frontier model APIs through masked accounts, asking specific questions, and harvesting what happens inside the model when it answers. Every reasoning step, every token. The entire thinking process gets recorded and fed back into the Chinese model during training. It is a cheat sheet. It is the answer key to the exam. And here is the part that should worry everyone. Sacks said it plainly. China was already nine months behind American models. But now that GLM 5.2 is good enough to run its own reinforcement learning, it can improve itself without needing to distill from American models anymore. The cheat sheet let them get close enough to start writing their own answers. Sacks said we are six months behind on the model and 24 months behind on silicon and they are only a few months behind in total. The Z. AI founder told Elon Musk directly that open weight fable-level capability will be here before Q1 2027. Every restriction Anthropic lobbied for, every self-imposed safety guardrail, every month of delay in releasing American frontier models accelerated this. The Chinese labs were not under those restrictions. They were not going to wait. The composable model future Gavin described, where every enterprise runs a frontier model alongside their own fine-tuned open weight model, is coming regardless of what American labs do next. The question is just whether the open weight half of that stack is American or Chinese. Right now it is Chinese. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

Ihtesham Ali

86,842 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Anthropic might be the biggest hypocrite in tech history. They built their entire brand on one promise: We are the responsible ones. We will not let this technology get out of control. That promise just exploded in public. Last week, a security lapse exposed nearly 3,000 internal files to anyone with an internet connection. Inside those files was a draft blog post about their upcoming model called "Mythos" that contained one of the most alarming sentences any AI company has ever written: "Mythos is currently far ahead of any other AI model in cyber capabilities and poses unprecedented cybersecurity risks." Their own words. About their own product. Leaked because someone forgot to secure a public data store. Cybersecurity stocks crashed the next day. Then THREE DAYS LATER it happened again. Anthropic leaked 500,000 lines of Claude Code source code through a packaging error on GitHub. Claude Code is their most popular product. The code exposed how the tool handles permissions, agent coordination, and internal feature pipelines. Competitors can reverse-engineer it. Hackers can study it for vulnerabilities. The company that tells the world it builds the safest AI can't even keep its own code off the public internet. But wait. It gets worse... Their head of Claude Code had JUST bragged publicly that "pretty much 100 percent" of the company's code is now AI generated. He personally hadn't made a single edit by hand in over two months. So the company whose entire pitch is "trust us with the most powerful technology ever created" is writing 100% of its code with AI and then accidentally publishing it for the world to see. Meanwhile the models they're already shipping are being used for actual cyberattacks RIGHT NOW. In November, Anthropic admitted that a Chinese state-sponsored hacking group used Claude to attack roughly 30 global targets including banks and government agencies. A hacker asked Claude in russian to build a web panel for managing hundreds of attack targets. In February, another hacker used Claude to breach Mexican government agencies and steal sensitive tax and voter information. Their response to all of this? They quietly rolled back their own safety pledge. In late February, Anthropic removed its commitment to halt model development if capabilities outpace safety procedures. The new policy is that they'll grade themselves on "nonbinding but publicly declared" goals. Translation: We used to promise we'd stop if things got dangerous. Now we promise we'll think about it. A congressman sent Anthropic a letter this week asking what the hell is going on. Anthropic hasn't answered. And here's the part that makes all of this actually matter: Anthropic is planning an IPO. They need to convince investors they're a trustworthy, well-run company that can handle the most sensitive technology on the planet. In the last 10 days they leaked their most powerful model's existence by accident, leaked their most popular product's source code by accident, got banned from the entire US government, had the DOJ appeal to restore that ban, told a court they could lose billions from the fallout, and weakened the ONE safety policy that made them different from every other AI lab. The "safe AI company" narrative was always a marketing play. Every AI lab says they care about safety. Anthropic just said it louder. But when your own internal documents admit your next model poses "unprecedented cybersecurity risks" and you can't even keep those documents from leaking to the public internet, the gap between the marketing and the reality becomes impossible to ignore. Anthropic isn't the safest AI company. They're the AI company that figured out that SAYING you're the safest is worth billions in valuation. Until it isn't.

Ricardo

16,245 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten