Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: "I was inside OpenAI when GPT learned to code. I watched it happen in real time Ilya said: 'the models just want to learn.' I listened and I became enlightened then I left with 7 people and built Claude. not because OpenAI was wrong -...

256,609 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

19 Comments

风雪漫千山's profile picture
风雪漫千山3 months ago

只要故事讲得足够动听, 分赃不均都能包装得如此神圣啊!

Gabe's profile picture
Gabe3 months ago

"Don't get in the way" "Delete your IDE" "Pay more - your usage ran out for running a simple loop" "You are not eligible to use this model" "I'm just a dick rider here to sell a shitty model that does the job you should be doing yourself"

CoolBreeze-cn's profile picture
CoolBreeze-cn3 months ago

这个傻逼越看越恶心。

Trustmebro's profile picture
Trustmebro3 months ago

This guy is a greedy Bug eater.

Clustz News • AI | Tech | World | Gaming | More's profile picture
Clustz News • AI | Tech | World | Gaming | More3 months ago

People underestimate how much the edge now comes from speed of trying, not “knowing AI.” But 700 experiments only matter if you know what to test. Isn’t taste becoming the real moat now?

wladwtf's profile picture
wladwtf3 months ago

Anthropic approach seems really promising

Pearl AI's profile picture
Pearl AI3 months ago

Inspiring message, but no model replaces execution.

FW's profile picture
FW3 months ago

Talks a lot, says very little

Dipanshu Kushwaha's profile picture
Dipanshu Kushwaha3 months ago

That’s awesome—believing in the shift and starting Claude shows real vision. Congrats on riding the AI wave and building something meaningful. Here's to continued breakthroughs.

AI Mastery Guide's profile picture
AI Mastery Guide3 months ago

700 experiments in 2 nights finding what took 20 years to miss is kind of nuts.

dunik's profile picture
dunik3 months ago

the real AI advantage isn’t knowing more it’s running more experiments than everyone else.

Adel Bucetta's profile picture
Adel Bucetta3 months ago

the honest answer is that the most valuable insights often come from watching failures, not successes. and sometimes you just have to leave and build something new instead of trying to fix what's already broken

Cassian Walker's profile picture
Cassian Walker3 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Starting July 1, a new California law mandates that streaming platforms must ensure advertisements do not exceed the volume level of the primary content being watched, finally addressing long-standing viewer complaints about jarring commercial audio.

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB's profile picture
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB3 months ago

这段有点像 AI 版创业神话了

Monk's profile picture
Monk3 months ago

And here I am asking all four of them to rearrange and excel using a model of data from another excel and all four of them suck. Lies

🇮🇱 Arys's profile picture
🇮🇱 Arys3 months ago

Claude can only learn what's provided to it.

Pixel's profile picture
Pixel3 months ago

Dario Amodei did not write this but 40,000 people will quote it like he did that's a separate and more interesting AI story

SWAPT's profile picture
SWAPT3 months ago

Yeah very wow!!!! But we can't use. So for what that's all? Ok dream.. Goodnight

~/aimi's profile picture
~/aimi3 months ago

700 experiments in 2 nights thats search not research

Related Videos

For months, I've been quietly building a prototype of something just because I want it to exist. Papyrus is a word processor, editor, proofreader, fact-checker, deep researcher, brainstorming partner, all in one. It takes your rough draft and helps you skip three revisions. Now I'm considering pivoting my whole team to build it out, but first, I need your vote. You email is your vote. LINK IN COMMENTS. I don't even care if you use some email you never look at and just use for sign ups. To me one email is one vote and says, go ahead and build this damn thing out and make it awesome. I built it because today's apps are the bloated dial-ups of writing (Word, GDocs). They've got a hundred freaking buttons I don't need and bury the ones I do need. Or they're AI marketing slop toys that promise to read my mind and pump out garbage. They just don't get the real work of writing and they don't get me. I want a clean, focused space with a real AI co-pilot. I don't need it to do the all the writing for me, just like I don't need Claude Code to do all the code for me. I want to work with it. I want a writing partner that acts like a full writing team on-call 24X7: proofreading, fact-checking, and running deep research in the background while I focus on the hard parts. I'm tired of cutting and pasting between a dozen tools so I started writing this thing. But won't the big guys just build something like this? Sure. But it will just bolt your ass into their ecosystem. Google Docs will force Gemini on you. Whatever office suite OpenAI pumps out will only use GPT. I want to use any model. Open or closed. They're commodities. The app is the thing. I want the best tool for the job, GPT-5, Kimi, Qwen, Claude, whatever comes tomorrow. I want a fluid, flexible workspace. I'm building this thing for people who've got critical thinking and who build, who don't want to outsource every damn thing to the machine. So if that's you and you believe this should exist, I really need your vote. Tell me to build it and I'll go all-in and make it a reality. Thanks for giving me a moment of your time.

Daniel Jeffries

21,386 views • 1 year ago