Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Data ownership and control is always the same - it's owned by the customer, not Flock.

25,543 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

29 Comments

Flth Pig's profile picture
Flth Pig3 months ago

No, it's not. It's owned by the individual. Not you. Not your customers. Get a warrant and go fuck yourself.

smurly's profile picture
smurly3 months ago

so then stop watching children in gyms and letting crazy people use the cameras to stalk their exs you terrorists

Joshua Done's profile picture
Joshua Done3 months ago

Stop trying to monetize 1984.

Zero Sum Game's profile picture
Zero Sum Game3 months ago

Fake boosts by Flock. Fake law enforcement effort. Very real constitutional violations.

Rusty Shackleford 🟧's profile picture
Rusty Shackleford 🟧3 months ago

That’s why flock employees were jerking off to children’s gym photos, right?

Taffy Lee Fubbins's profile picture
Taffy Lee Fubbins3 months ago

You have absolutely no right to collect this information and track people’s movement no matter who “owns” the data. Fuck. You.

chaindasher.eth's profile picture
chaindasher.eth3 months ago

No amount of X posts will change the minds of the American people who have been pushed way to damn far. Maybe just go the private security route because what yall are doing is violating EVERYONES privacy and right to travel freely not just criminals.

The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts's profile picture
The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts3 months ago

How many years ago did Snowden release info on the NSA? How many stories of cops fucking around with this spying daily? How long until you sell the data like everyone else. You’re not selling this, every camera will be eventually be ripped out by a patriot. Fuck off.

🤘Metelhed🤘's profile picture
🤘Metelhed🤘3 months ago

Flock cameras are an abomination. I detest anyone who works for Flock and consider them enemies of the people.

Chrisy | Homemade Hooplah's profile picture
Chrisy | Homemade Hooplah3 months ago

Who cares about the rights of your "customers" when you're exploiting the public as your "product." This entire concept is a violation of the 4th Amendment and all of you belong in jail.

Osint_Ghost's profile picture
Osint_Ghost3 months ago

Yet flock has access and so does anyone with half a brain. That would be why many of your employees have been found viewing cameras that are supposedly owned by police departments. 🤷‍♂️ lie somewhere else.

Hi-Tech Red-Nech's profile picture
Hi-Tech Red-Nech3 months ago

Who is the customer? Who is paying? The government in most cases right? So the government owns the data, is that what you are saying?

arctoadus's profile picture
arctoadus3 months ago

Really? I heard your data isn't available to the public, even to exonerate themselves when accused of a crime. What say you?

MadHtr 🇺🇸's profile picture
MadHtr 🇺🇸3 months ago

The "data" you speak of trading like a commodity is MY PERSONAL travel history and it is MY data, buddy.

async's profile picture
async3 months ago

Who is the customer you misleading hacks? You keep saying this same line over and over hoping people don’t realize they don’t own their own data - the unelected authoritarians in their local community own the data. And we’ve already seen local police officers abusing it for personal use. You need to be shutdown and ran out of business forever.

Joe Megalith's profile picture
Joe Megalith3 months ago

Cute. So the customer also owns the dozens of stalking cases (Georgia alone had ~20 in a year), the 1.6 million out-of-state/federal queries on SF’s cameras, the abortion search that hit 83,000 of them, the Border Patrol backdoors in states that banned it, and the “rare” 15 incidents that somehow keep multiplying every time someone checks HaveIBeenFlocked? Audits and 30-day limits sure are crushing it.

Chris Heimark's profile picture
Chris Heimark3 months ago

Listen up — Flock and its customers don’t own me. Stop grifting off of the government, robbing taxpayers and pretending you aren’t adding to a massive spy database. You want global 1984 and to satisfy your IL handlers. US citizens don’t. Go away.

Bran Es's profile picture
Bran Es3 months ago

Don’t start with that crap. We will not submit to a police state, this is not China. Fuck you.

Face's profile picture
Face3 months ago

US v Chatrie was the beginning of the end of Flocks warrantless dragnet surveillance scheme. I can't wait for these scumbags to get sued by everyone in the US. Flock is perpetrating the most blatantly illegal data collection scheme since PRISM on the entire population of the US

Mob Circa's profile picture
Mob Circa3 months ago

Posting this every day won’t earn the public’s trust.

Catbert: Age ID is Socialist & counterproductive's profile picture
Catbert: Age ID is Socialist & counterproductive3 months ago

You are trying to OWN US, you controk freak!

Bear-Do-Well 🐻's profile picture
Bear-Do-Well 🐻3 months ago

You think you can do an end run around the 4th amendment because "it's not the government doing the illegal surveillance, it's a private company bro" Go fuck yourselves

Spade's profile picture
Spade3 months ago

Weird way of admitting governments own the data.

jd's profile picture
jd3 months ago

Yeah and the people youre mass collecting data on arent the "customers." They customer is who youre selling access to

Jack Burton's profile picture
Jack Burton3 months ago

You mean the government?

AdventureNLearn's profile picture
AdventureNLearn3 months ago

So open the books since the public is your biggest funding stream...

True Threats's profile picture
True Threats3 months ago

Ownership isn't the question. Access is. Your whole product is a network where other agencies can search into a customer's data.

Detective Umbreon's profile picture
Detective Umbreon3 months ago

I'm not your customer so I'd appreciate if you take your Stasi robot bs and peace off to North Korea where you belong.

robot heart's profile picture
robot heart3 months ago

I pray for the destruction of your company and it's products

Related Videos