Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

David Eby is out today slamming Trump’s tariffs as an “economic attack” and “indefensible” He even called the Canada-US dynamic “the definition of an abusive relationship” — one where America wants all the benefits while punishing Canadian workers Bold diagnosis from the premier whose government turned a surplus into...

27,639 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

David Eby did not call an election. He struck a match Two years in, one-seat majority, a budget that already embarrassed itself, and a property-rights mess his government helped cook — then the Conservatives imploded, and suddenly the province needed “stability.” That is not leadership. That is a man smelling smoke in his own kitchen and sprinting for the door The fire is property title. His government sold UNDRIP theatre and Haida “templates,” then acted stunned when a court put Cowichan Aboriginal title above fee simple on private land in Richmond. Mortgages stalled. Sales froze. Homeowners got letters saying the deed might be junior to someone else’s claim. Then he posed as the defender of private property — after stacking the kindling Now he wants a snap vote a week after municipal elections, while the opposition is wounded on the floor And he had the gall to say this: “Living through wildfire season. Even if you never expected the fire to reach you… when you smell smoke, you don’t sit and wait… You cut a line through the forest… You build a firebreak.” You smell smoke, David, because you lit it. The firebreak is not Trump. The firebreak is an October 24 ballot designed to trap people in the house before they inspect the basement He is not cutting a line through the forest. He is locking the doors and calling the flames a mandate. Scumbag move Eby is not a premier, but an arsonist posing as the Fire Marshall David Eby

cbcwatcher

18,045 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

In 2016, David Eby stood in the Legislature and thundered about debt. He accused the government of “racking up more debt faster than any government in B.C. history.” He mocked claims of economic strength. He framed it as a failure of integrity and responsibility. He told British Columbians they were being misled. At the time, B.C. had balanced budgets. Debt was roughly $65.2 billion. There were no $10-billion-plus operating deficits. There was no projected doubling of taxpayer-supported debt. The province was not adding $13.3 billion in red ink in a single year. Fast forward to 2026. Under Premier David Eby, British Columbia is projecting a $13.3 billion deficit next year. Taxpayer-supported debt is forecast to rise toward $189 billion over the fiscal plan. Debt-servicing costs are approaching $9 billion annually. Taxes are rising across multiple fronts. Long-term care projects are delayed. Housing starts are down. Population growth has stalled. In 2016, he attacked debt growth in a balanced-budget environment. In 2026, he presides over structural multi-billion-dollar deficits and calls it “disciplined.” In 2016, he said governments were telling people one thing while doing the opposite. In 2026, he promises fiscal responsibility while debt accelerates and the deficit jumps by billions before any promised decline. The standard he used to judge others now applies directly to him. If $79 billion in debt during balanced budgets was grounds for outrage, what is $189 billion in projected debt alongside persistent deficits?

Harman Bhangu

11,797 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🦅🏡⚖️ : David Eby lied to everyone 11 days ago about the BC Supreme Court ruling on Cowichan land title claims against private property owners, in Richmond British Columbia. 🧐Watch the full brief video as there are several clips added to provide full context. In the last clip hereditary Chief of Lyackson, Huy’wu’qw Shana Thomas, makes it clear, she wants Aboriginal title to apply to all the properties in the same way the Crown had title, when the Crown sold the property to the current land owners. Giving Aboriginal title would nullify the current land owners title and force them to make an agreement with whichever tribe regains land title, through the courts. Remember folks, some properties have multiple land title claims against the property, from multiple 1st Nation tribes. The major question is, why has David Eby not resigned? How many times can a Premier lie to taxpayers on critical issues? David Eby knew for years he could inform private property owners who have a land title claim against their property and he chose to keep them out of the process. This was an intentional act, ensuring the BC Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cowichan land title claim, Eby is now pretending to partially oppose. How can Eby, the Federal government or the City of Richmond be counted on to fight for land title rights for current property owners, when they all conspired to omit those very property owners, from the court case? 95% of British Columbia could be impacted by the precedence the Cowichan land title ruling presents in Richmond BC. The entire city of Kamloops has a land title claim against it. So it's impossible to ignore the devastating impact this could have on almost everyone in British Columbia who owns property or who has a mortgage / reverse mortgage on their property. This is especially true if lenders begin to refuse to provide loans to people who currently have loan agreements because the risks of lenders losing their loan investments, are too great.

Bruce McGonigal

40,507 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten