Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🧠David Friedberg explains the great hope of Artificial Superintelligence: Massive leverage on time to solve thousand-year problems "I don't think that humans are limited in our ability to solve problems." "I think we're limited in terms of time, and what digital intelligence gives us is leverage on time so...

theallinpod's profile picture

The All-In Podcast

579,204 subscribers

53,187 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Tesla's Chief Designer Franz on Optimus: "It's going to be huge piece of Tesla, a huge piece in our world, as we look into the future, the ability to take menial tasks and things that you don't necessarily want to do and have them uploaded to somebody, a human, that can do that. We've been designing the robot that really looks at how humans work in the world. This world is designed around humans, and so I think having a robot that can do the things that humans can do can really start to take those menial tasks away and enrich in our lives, make our lives better we get to spend more time doing the things that we love. It's been incredibly fast paced, but the progress is, like, unbelievable in the short amount of time that the team has been working on it, and we've been growing the team and building the project the same time. I think we're breaking ground in this space everyday. The team is really energized and fired out. Elon Musk is incredibly involved in this. It's a great project to be a part of, and seeing where the future is gonna go and how it's going to enrich our lives is super exciting."
1:13

Tesla's Chief Designer Franz on Optimus: "It's going to be huge piece of Tesla, a huge piece in our world, as we look into the future, the ability to take menial tasks and things that you don't necessarily want to do and have them uploaded to somebody, a human, that can do that. We've been designing the robot that really looks at how humans work in the world. This world is designed around humans, and so I think having a robot that can do the things that humans can do can really start to take those menial tasks away and enrich in our lives, make our lives better we get to spend more time doing the things that we love. It's been incredibly fast paced, but the progress is, like, unbelievable in the short amount of time that the team has been working on it, and we've been growing the team and building the project the same time. I think we're breaking ground in this space everyday. The team is really energized and fired out. Elon Musk is incredibly involved in this. It's a great project to be a part of, and seeing where the future is gonna go and how it's going to enrich our lives is super exciting."

DogeDesigner

202,945 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."
1:00

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

ELON: SOMEONE HAS TO SOLVE ROCKET REUSABILITY — WHETHER IT’S SPACEX OR SOMEONE ELSE “The cost of the fuel and oxygen on a Falcon 9 is 0.3% of the cost of the rocket. So, it's a very tiny number. It's very similar to an airplane. How much does it cost to fuel up an airplane, and how much does it cost to buy an airplane? They're very different things. If humanity is ever to expand beyond Earth and establish a self-sustaining base on another planet, it's critical that we solve this problem. Whether it's SpaceX or someone else, someone has to solve the problem, and we can have a hundred-fold reduction in the cost of spaceflight. That's what SpaceX has been trying to do, and really that's been the goal since the beginning of the company. So far, I've not been very successful in that regard, but I think we have a handle on it. We've got a design that closes in the simulations. If we can build that thing, it should work.” Source: SXSW, March 2013
0:58

ELON: SOMEONE HAS TO SOLVE ROCKET REUSABILITY — WHETHER IT’S SPACEX OR SOMEONE ELSE “The cost of the fuel and oxygen on a Falcon 9 is 0.3% of the cost of the rocket. So, it's a very tiny number. It's very similar to an airplane. How much does it cost to fuel up an airplane, and how much does it cost to buy an airplane? They're very different things. If humanity is ever to expand beyond Earth and establish a self-sustaining base on another planet, it's critical that we solve this problem. Whether it's SpaceX or someone else, someone has to solve the problem, and we can have a hundred-fold reduction in the cost of spaceflight. That's what SpaceX has been trying to do, and really that's been the goal since the beginning of the company. So far, I've not been very successful in that regard, but I think we have a handle on it. We've got a design that closes in the simulations. If we can build that thing, it should work.” Source: SXSW, March 2013

Mario Nawfal

2,652,416 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dr. Phil Goes Off Script With Stunning Criticism of the US Government “We got people in charge of solving problems that don’t really want to solve them because their job depends on having that problem. “They need that problem to justify their existence. They need that problem to maintain this huge bureaucracy, to maintain this big budget, this big agency. They need that problem to exist. I think we’ve got people in charge of solving problems that are not problem solvers.”
0:25

Dr. Phil Goes Off Script With Stunning Criticism of the US Government “We got people in charge of solving problems that don’t really want to solve them because their job depends on having that problem. “They need that problem to justify their existence. They need that problem to maintain this huge bureaucracy, to maintain this big budget, this big agency. They need that problem to exist. I think we’ve got people in charge of solving problems that are not problem solvers.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,147,315 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🗣️: we know that your williams is starting off with an overweight problem. based on your experience, do you think it's a problem they'll be able to solve, and if so, how long will it take? carlos: honestly, i think we're starting with a weight problem and a downforce problem because, ultimately, the gap between the cars in front isn't all weight; there's also a downforce gap, and we have to address both, (find out) how it is possible that williams, who had the whole of 2025 to focus on the 2026 car and with more hours in the wind tunnel, we weren't as good at developing the car as the top four teams that had less time, and that were fighting for the world championship last year. so it's a lesson for the team to see how far ahead the frontrunners are. we also have to learn to make lighter cars, but i think we've already figured that out this year *laughs*, and i think the team will already be ready to produce lighter cars next year.
0:59

Sensitive content

🗣️: we know that your williams is starting off with an overweight problem. based on your experience, do you think it's a problem they'll be able to solve, and if so, how long will it take? carlos: honestly, i think we're starting with a weight problem and a downforce problem because, ultimately, the gap between the cars in front isn't all weight; there's also a downforce gap, and we have to address both, (find out) how it is possible that williams, who had the whole of 2025 to focus on the 2026 car and with more hours in the wind tunnel, we weren't as good at developing the car as the top four teams that had less time, and that were fighting for the world championship last year. so it's a lesson for the team to see how far ahead the frontrunners are. we also have to learn to make lighter cars, but i think we've already figured that out this year *laughs*, and i think the team will already be ready to produce lighter cars next year.

yoyo 🦄

68,107 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: Do we want to be in many worlds, or forever confined to Earth? “There are so many things to worry about, so many things to be concerned about. There are many troubles in the world, of course, and these are important, and we need to solve them. But we also need things that make us excited to be alive, that make us glad to wake up in the morning and be fired up about the future and think the future is going to be great. Space exploration is one of those things. Becoming a space-faring civilization, being out there among the stars, this is one of the things that I know makes me glad to be alive. I think it makes many people glad to be alive. It's one of the best things. Really, we're faced with a choice: Which future do you want? Do you want a future where we become a space-faring civilization and are in many worlds and are out there among the stars, or one where we are forever confined to Earth? I say it is the first. And I hope you agree with me.” Starship Update, September 2019
0:59

Elon Musk: Do we want to be in many worlds, or forever confined to Earth? “There are so many things to worry about, so many things to be concerned about. There are many troubles in the world, of course, and these are important, and we need to solve them. But we also need things that make us excited to be alive, that make us glad to wake up in the morning and be fired up about the future and think the future is going to be great. Space exploration is one of those things. Becoming a space-faring civilization, being out there among the stars, this is one of the things that I know makes me glad to be alive. I think it makes many people glad to be alive. It's one of the best things. Really, we're faced with a choice: Which future do you want? Do you want a future where we become a space-faring civilization and are in many worlds and are out there among the stars, or one where we are forever confined to Earth? I say it is the first. And I hope you agree with me.” Starship Update, September 2019

ELON CLIPS

1,684,222 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.
2:50

This is the first stage. We are now in a situation where it's 10 and 10 plus 20 for fentanyl, so 30% tariffs in the US of China goods coming in, and they can get rid of 20% of it if they solve the fentanyl problem. That they will do with certainty. But we’re not finished there and neither are millions of small entrepreneurs in America that I represent. We need IP law to be finally put into place so that our products and services are protected in their markets the way we protect theirs and ours. So, reciprocal playing field is where we need to go. This is a great first step but it's only the beginning. I want to sell to the Chinese people. I have no problem with them. I have a big problem with their government. They don't abide by the rules. We've known that for a long time and no admin has dealt with China, even after they came into the World Trade Organization in 2000. They've breached every covenant of that agreement so it's important for us to set the tone in terms of how we're going to go forward with China.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

50,199 просмотров • 1 год назад

ERIKA KIRK: “As Americans, we are all privileged to live in the greatest country in the world.” “Is it perfect? No, it's not. Do we have problems to solve? Of course, of course we do. But our country is the best that we have, and I do not want to lose it.”
0:28

ERIKA KIRK: “As Americans, we are all privileged to live in the greatest country in the world.” “Is it perfect? No, it's not. Do we have problems to solve? Of course, of course we do. But our country is the best that we have, and I do not want to lose it.”

Fox News

176,201 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"I think among a lot of Democrats there's this kind of what psychologists would call 'learned helplessness' where you just think, 'Well we can't do anything about it. We have to wait till 2029' ... In New York with some people it's just like, 'Well we just have to do our things in New York and not worry about the rest of the country.' It does not work that way. We are one country. Our democracy can rise or fall on what this man is doing. And, it's not just our democracy. ... It directly affects our lives. The stability of our economy depends on the belief in the rule of law that people think we have a stable legal system, and it's hard to believe that today"
1:26

"I think among a lot of Democrats there's this kind of what psychologists would call 'learned helplessness' where you just think, 'Well we can't do anything about it. We have to wait till 2029' ... In New York with some people it's just like, 'Well we just have to do our things in New York and not worry about the rest of the country.' It does not work that way. We are one country. Our democracy can rise or fall on what this man is doing. And, it's not just our democracy. ... It directly affects our lives. The stability of our economy depends on the belief in the rule of law that people think we have a stable legal system, and it's hard to believe that today"

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

80,959 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: The ultimate purpose of Neuralink is to reduce the existential risk of digital superintelligence by giving humans a way to merge with AI. “There's, I think, a tremendous amount of good that Neuralink can do in solving critical damage to the brain or the spinal cord. There's a lot that can be done to improve quality of life of individuals, and those will be steps along the way. And then ultimately, it's intended to address the risk, the existential risk associated with digital superintelligence. Like, we will not be able to be smarter than a digital supercomputer. So therefore, if you cannot beat them, join them. And at least we want to have that option. [...] It's important that Neuralink solve this problem sooner rather than later, because the point at which we have digital superintelligence, that's when we pass singularity, and things become just very uncertain. It doesn't mean that they're necessarily bad or good, but the point at which we pass singularity, things become extremely unstable. So we want to have a human brain interface before the singularity, or at least not long after it, to minimize existential risk for humanity and consciousness as we know it.” Lex Fridman Podcast, November 12, 2019
1:50

Elon Musk: The ultimate purpose of Neuralink is to reduce the existential risk of digital superintelligence by giving humans a way to merge with AI. “There's, I think, a tremendous amount of good that Neuralink can do in solving critical damage to the brain or the spinal cord. There's a lot that can be done to improve quality of life of individuals, and those will be steps along the way. And then ultimately, it's intended to address the risk, the existential risk associated with digital superintelligence. Like, we will not be able to be smarter than a digital supercomputer. So therefore, if you cannot beat them, join them. And at least we want to have that option. [...] It's important that Neuralink solve this problem sooner rather than later, because the point at which we have digital superintelligence, that's when we pass singularity, and things become just very uncertain. It doesn't mean that they're necessarily bad or good, but the point at which we pass singularity, things become extremely unstable. So we want to have a human brain interface before the singularity, or at least not long after it, to minimize existential risk for humanity and consciousness as we know it.” Lex Fridman Podcast, November 12, 2019

ELON CLIPS

26,460 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“The stock market was 50,000 … so I said this was a good time to solve a problem that we had to solve, and it’s what I did (War with Iran)”. If this was actually about an imminent threat from Iran, why would the price of the stock market be one of the factors on timing?
0:37

“The stock market was 50,000 … so I said this was a good time to solve a problem that we had to solve, and it’s what I did (War with Iran)”. If this was actually about an imminent threat from Iran, why would the price of the stock market be one of the factors on timing?

Murray 🇺🇸

137,099 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 WOW! HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. DROPS this line on an insufferable Democrat representative "If you want just a SOUNDBYTE that you can come in here, you can get that and you did it!" "But if you actually want to SOLVE the problem, call me — because we're aligned on the issue of getting good food to children and we think that we're doing a good job of it." "We could do a better job, but come and tell us how we can do a better job and that would be something we could all profit from."
0:51

🚨 WOW! HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. DROPS this line on an insufferable Democrat representative "If you want just a SOUNDBYTE that you can come in here, you can get that and you did it!" "But if you actually want to SOLVE the problem, call me — because we're aligned on the issue of getting good food to children and we think that we're doing a good job of it." "We could do a better job, but come and tell us how we can do a better job and that would be something we could all profit from."

Eric Daugherty

119,089 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Here is an example of an IRGC missile malfunctioning and dropping in Iran. This could have easily been what hit that building of school girls. If the Regime has no problem slaughtering it's own civilians, do you think they would have a problem lying to you and I to get what they want? I think the obvious answer to that is no.
2:59

Here is an example of an IRGC missile malfunctioning and dropping in Iran. This could have easily been what hit that building of school girls. If the Regime has no problem slaughtering it's own civilians, do you think they would have a problem lying to you and I to get what they want? I think the obvious answer to that is no.

Jeffery Mead

141,066 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

JOE ROGAN: GOOGLE’S AI SOLVED AN IMPOSSIBLE EQUATION IN MINUTES Joe said Google’s AI achieved a staggering breakthrough by solving a problem that would take the world’s supercomputers billions of years. He said the calculation was so complex that even turning every atom in the universe into a computer wouldn’t have done it in time: “I believe it’s the Google one. They solved an equation that would take the world’s supercomputers, I think it was 2.6 billion years to solve, and it solved it in a matter of minutes. The only way for it to solve this problem, Marc Andreessen said it on my podcast, the equation is so difficult that if you took every atom in the universe and converted it to a supercomputer, the universe would die of heat death before it would solve this equation. And it solved it in minutes.” Source: Joe Rogan Jesse Michels
4:06

JOE ROGAN: GOOGLE’S AI SOLVED AN IMPOSSIBLE EQUATION IN MINUTES Joe said Google’s AI achieved a staggering breakthrough by solving a problem that would take the world’s supercomputers billions of years. He said the calculation was so complex that even turning every atom in the universe into a computer wouldn’t have done it in time: “I believe it’s the Google one. They solved an equation that would take the world’s supercomputers, I think it was 2.6 billion years to solve, and it solved it in a matter of minutes. The only way for it to solve this problem, Marc Andreessen said it on my podcast, the equation is so difficult that if you took every atom in the universe and converted it to a supercomputer, the universe would die of heat death before it would solve this equation. And it solved it in minutes.” Source: Joe Rogan Jesse Michels

Mario Nawfal

861,540 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.James Talarico: I frankly am tired of the "thoughts and prayers" rhetoric from our leaders here in Texas and in our nation's capital. I believe in the power of prayer. I believe prayer changes lives. I believe prayer changes the world. But there is something profoundly cynical about asking God to solve a problem that we're not willing to solve ourselves. Scripture reminds us that faith without works is dead — the time for thoughts and prayers is over. It's time for us to act.
0:59

.James Talarico: I frankly am tired of the "thoughts and prayers" rhetoric from our leaders here in Texas and in our nation's capital. I believe in the power of prayer. I believe prayer changes lives. I believe prayer changes the world. But there is something profoundly cynical about asking God to solve a problem that we're not willing to solve ourselves. Scripture reminds us that faith without works is dead — the time for thoughts and prayers is over. It's time for us to act.

Team Talarico

730,056 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Robert Benzie: "What Danielle Smith has done is open a can of worms to solve a problem within the United Conservative Party just as David Cameron opened a can of worms to solve a problem in the UK Conservative Party ... why would you ask a question at the risk of finding an answer that you don't want. I think it's just insane on many levels."
0:55

Robert Benzie: "What Danielle Smith has done is open a can of worms to solve a problem within the United Conservative Party just as David Cameron opened a can of worms to solve a problem in the UK Conservative Party ... why would you ask a question at the risk of finding an answer that you don't want. I think it's just insane on many levels."

Scott Robertson

40,521 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад