正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

David Friedberg says with open source, we no longer even need data centers for 90% of what we use AI for "I thought it was worth taking a step back to recognize where we are because in the context of 'we have to stop the super intelligence, we have...

dnapway's profile picture

dnap

8,840 subscribers

27,703 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

18 条评论

OneSpicyMeatBall 的头像
OneSpicyMeatBall1 天前

Nice clip, agree. I am starting to find, at least with codex so far, copyright protection is showing up in the terminal. I literally watched codex get stuck in a loop from music that I made myself, trying to figure out if it was copy right protected, on MY DIME. If those tokens and processes are offloaded, thats one thing, but now your burning my limits on copyright? It also starting to FUD Claude when I tried to make codex the orchastrator, telling me claude is insecure and im like.... brother your doing the same things! Then it started blocking claude artifact links. Open source is the way.

dnap 的头像
dnap1 天前

yes have noticed much more sensitivity from ant/openai on copyright and origination that was completely missing before

@Galactic_Gator 的头像
@Galactic_Gator1 天前

False. He didn't say that. Or you just don't understand what he said.

Architectonic 的头像
Architectonic1 天前

AI Long Con: There is no moat around proprietary closed source LLM models. And the reason is overfitting: @cassa

HighVoltage 的头像
HighVoltage1 天前

Commoditization kills business models, not benefits...#AI

Jake 'Nelwood 的头像
Jake 'Nelwood1 天前

And if not, a cheap Chinese version will be shipping soon.

Umesh Patil 的头像
Umesh Patil22 小时前

This is where I am going! Yesterday, I did a hackathon. Ran a good Liquid AI model locally to do the work! No issues. Just because Super AI solves Field Medal-caliber problems doesn't mean everyone needs it or companies must have it...

Ombudsman4Truth 的头像
Ombudsman4Truth19 小时前

The public and government backlash to AI and Data Centers is likely just what the industry needed to have an excuse to take a breath and evaluate where the business is going, and maybe cancel future contacts

TROLL R’Us 的头像
TROLL R’Us23 小时前

No what he said retard

Colorado Julie 的头像
Colorado Julie1 天前

Always love Friedberg’s takes. They’re straight forward facts and non biased politically.

Doctor Balaclava 的头像
Doctor Balaclava19 小时前

How do these guys not have better hairlines

Edmond Chin 的头像
Edmond Chin1 天前

What does this mean for the compute capacity that the hyperscalers are spending their capex for?

Mariya Valeva 的头像
Mariya Valeva1 天前

the shift is from “who owns the data center?” to “who owns the best model and distribution?”

Kyle.Moon τ 的头像
Kyle.Moon τ1 天前

Yeah I will say this open source still 6 months behind frontier but in a year I can see this being the tipping point where open source is now just that good it’s like why pay $100 a month? If you can just buy a Mac book and run your local agent on it or a Linux built laptop for equivalent spec.

dnap 的头像
dnap1 天前

ft @friedberg @chamath @Jason @DavidSacks @theallinpod

Cold Drink 的头像
Cold Drink1 天前

Well well well.."you don't even need data centers to do 90% of what you can do with AI". Hear that #ORCL? You're COOKED!!

hrishikesh kamath 的头像
hrishikesh kamath22 小时前

Not everybody has some jacked up MacBook Pro that runs a decent qwen model

The Dog of Sinope 🇺🇸 的头像
The Dog of Sinope 🇺🇸22 小时前

It cannot be stopped.

相关视频

Sen. Husted blames his constituents for record number of data centers in Ohio: "We just have to realize we're in this world in which we've created the demand. We the people have created the demand for these data centers because we use all of these digital products that it processes, and if we don't want them, then don't use them. I mean, you can go back to the bunny ear antenna on your TV, you don't need a data center. But if you're connected to a wire, you're using the data center. So, understand, when we look in the mirror, we are the problem."
0:42

Sen. Husted blames his constituents for record number of data centers in Ohio: "We just have to realize we're in this world in which we've created the demand. We the people have created the demand for these data centers because we use all of these digital products that it processes, and if we don't want them, then don't use them. I mean, you can go back to the bunny ear antenna on your TV, you don't need a data center. But if you're connected to a wire, you're using the data center. So, understand, when we look in the mirror, we are the problem."

Aaron Rupar

68,610 次观看 • 2 个月前

Are Data Centers Worth the Noise to Local Communities? "Multiple cities of people have filed lawsuits and complaints against these data centers because of the noise." "The first question I ask myself is, are we gonna need data centers in America? Yes, if we wanna compete in the modern world, in the modern economy, we are going to need them. They are good for society and good for the economy."
4:11

Are Data Centers Worth the Noise to Local Communities? "Multiple cities of people have filed lawsuits and complaints against these data centers because of the noise." "The first question I ask myself is, are we gonna need data centers in America? Yes, if we wanna compete in the modern world, in the modern economy, we are going to need them. They are good for society and good for the economy."

PBD Podcast

32,573 次观看 • 4 个月前

Saying "NO AI data centers" won't end in victory. They'll just build them anyways. If you truly want to make a difference, you need to say, "No data centers, UNLESS..." Turn it into a negotiation instead of a war, so we can fight over what really matters. No data centers UNLESS they're not draining our energy. In fact, you could say, "you want 10 gigawatts of power? Ok, YOU pay for it. And because we’re allowing you to do it, you have to produce 15 gigawatts of power and give the excess to the grid." It's a win-win and YOU control the terms.
9:24

Saying "NO AI data centers" won't end in victory. They'll just build them anyways. If you truly want to make a difference, you need to say, "No data centers, UNLESS..." Turn it into a negotiation instead of a war, so we can fight over what really matters. No data centers UNLESS they're not draining our energy. In fact, you could say, "you want 10 gigawatts of power? Ok, YOU pay for it. And because we’re allowing you to do it, you have to produce 15 gigawatts of power and give the excess to the grid." It's a win-win and YOU control the terms.

Glenn Beck

70,858 次观看 • 3 个月前

Hunt: So, who’s right on data centers? President Trump or Governor Shapiro? Fetterman: Oh, the president is actually right overall. I mean, you know, uh, we we used to be moving forward on data centers and now, I mean, he's actually scared by the polls. So I mean, what really what's really motivated by more than just the polls overall, you know, I set out I set up my message on it on data centers just a couple days on X where I'm saying it's, you know, the president happens to be right in this. You know, I think it's it's very necessary that we win the war on AI. Uh, we, I think it's necessary because AI is going to transform our world. And, you know, it can be either us be the leaders or it can be the Chinese. And we could we could live under those rules and they're going to build unlimited data centers. And they're not really, uh, really stopped by with the kind of like democracy and the kinds of rules that, that we have overall, I think it's important. And I would remind people, like a lot of the opposition is, is been driven by the ccp and a lot of a lot of influence. So I think now withwith data centers, uh, also there's the facts now that it, it consumes a very, very, maybe one tenth of 1%, you know, compared to almonds and compared to other other things, part of our economy and also our land usage as well, too. Pennsylvania, you know, we are energy rich, we are water rich. And we have we're land rich now. So I think it's an important part of our economy, not just for Pennsylvania's but also the country right now.
2:02

Hunt: So, who’s right on data centers? President Trump or Governor Shapiro? Fetterman: Oh, the president is actually right overall. I mean, you know, uh, we we used to be moving forward on data centers and now, I mean, he's actually scared by the polls. So I mean, what really what's really motivated by more than just the polls overall, you know, I set out I set up my message on it on data centers just a couple days on X where I'm saying it's, you know, the president happens to be right in this. You know, I think it's it's very necessary that we win the war on AI. Uh, we, I think it's necessary because AI is going to transform our world. And, you know, it can be either us be the leaders or it can be the Chinese. And we could we could live under those rules and they're going to build unlimited data centers. And they're not really, uh, really stopped by with the kind of like democracy and the kinds of rules that, that we have overall, I think it's important. And I would remind people, like a lot of the opposition is, is been driven by the ccp and a lot of a lot of influence. So I think now withwith data centers, uh, also there's the facts now that it, it consumes a very, very, maybe one tenth of 1%, you know, compared to almonds and compared to other other things, part of our economy and also our land usage as well, too. Pennsylvania, you know, we are energy rich, we are water rich. And we have we're land rich now. So I think it's an important part of our economy, not just for Pennsylvania's but also the country right now.

Acyn

204,594 次观看 • 25 天前

WOW! NBC’s Tom Costello: “Does it hurt your investigative process, maybe for the chairman, does it hurt the investigative process to have the President already suggesting possible causes here as you try to keep an open mind and begin this investigation?” NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy: “Tom, with all due respect, I think the press also likes to state what probable cause is before we get to at probable cause, so what I'm going to say is you need to give us time. You need to give NTSB — it's not that we don't have information. We do have information. We have data. We have substantial amounts of information. We need to verify information. We need to take our time to make sure it is accurate. That's best for you. That's important for the families. It's important for legislators who are seeking answers to try to figure out what they are going to do about this and so, it will take time. We do have a lot of information, but we need some time to verify that.”
1:07

WOW! NBC’s Tom Costello: “Does it hurt your investigative process, maybe for the chairman, does it hurt the investigative process to have the President already suggesting possible causes here as you try to keep an open mind and begin this investigation?” NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy: “Tom, with all due respect, I think the press also likes to state what probable cause is before we get to at probable cause, so what I'm going to say is you need to give us time. You need to give NTSB — it's not that we don't have information. We do have information. We have data. We have substantial amounts of information. We need to verify information. We need to take our time to make sure it is accurate. That's best for you. That's important for the families. It's important for legislators who are seeking answers to try to figure out what they are going to do about this and so, it will take time. We do have a lot of information, but we need some time to verify that.”

Curtis Houck

28,287 次观看 • 1 年前

David Sacks Calls Out Dario’s Contradictions on AI & Data Centers David Sacks: “Dario actually made this argument in the context of trying to ban export of chips, and the argument was that we want to have a data center full of geniuses in the US, and that eventually what AI's going to be used for is you're going to be able to create all these agents that are basically Nobel Prize-winning level scientists. And if we have thousands or millions of those, and China has only dozens or 100, whatever, then we're going to win everything. And that was the whole argument. But now we're basically banning the data centers. We're not going to have those data centers full of geniuses, and he's done his best to restrict the sale of chips to our allies as well. So I guess our allies aren't going to have the data centers either. So we are totally shooting ourselves in the foot, and probably it would be a good thing if Dario really does believe in the data centers full of geniuses idea that he was arguing for last year, he should come forward and say, ‘We're making a big mistake by over-regulating data centers, here's how we should do it.’ I haven't heard him step up in that way, and it makes you kind of question, do you only fight for the doomer side of the argument, or are there versions of the positive side that you're willing to fight for politically?”
1:10

David Sacks Calls Out Dario’s Contradictions on AI & Data Centers David Sacks: “Dario actually made this argument in the context of trying to ban export of chips, and the argument was that we want to have a data center full of geniuses in the US, and that eventually what AI's going to be used for is you're going to be able to create all these agents that are basically Nobel Prize-winning level scientists. And if we have thousands or millions of those, and China has only dozens or 100, whatever, then we're going to win everything. And that was the whole argument. But now we're basically banning the data centers. We're not going to have those data centers full of geniuses, and he's done his best to restrict the sale of chips to our allies as well. So I guess our allies aren't going to have the data centers either. So we are totally shooting ourselves in the foot, and probably it would be a good thing if Dario really does believe in the data centers full of geniuses idea that he was arguing for last year, he should come forward and say, ‘We're making a big mistake by over-regulating data centers, here's how we should do it.’ I haven't heard him step up in that way, and it makes you kind of question, do you only fight for the doomer side of the argument, or are there versions of the positive side that you're willing to fight for politically?”

The All-In Podcast

64,124 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance helps to clarify President Trump's stance on data centers, highlighting his desire for data centers to put power BACK into the grid "I think probably 99% of the backlash to data centers has come in areas where building a data center means higher utility and higher electricity for the people on the ground." "If you build a data center, you should be putting power back into the grid, not taking it out, and if that is happening, I don't think the data centers are that controversial."
0:51

🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance helps to clarify President Trump's stance on data centers, highlighting his desire for data centers to put power BACK into the grid "I think probably 99% of the backlash to data centers has come in areas where building a data center means higher utility and higher electricity for the people on the ground." "If you build a data center, you should be putting power back into the grid, not taking it out, and if that is happening, I don't think the data centers are that controversial."

Nick Sortor

217,808 次观看 • 27 天前

PRX alecks reflects on the team's playstyle and how it has evolved over the years: "I think we've just got a lot more careful. I think that was a bit disappointing on our side because I think we know how to shut this down because we used to do these kinds of things and we couldn't do it today because, again, like I said, we forgot. I can go through the years, but between 2022 to 2024, we pretty much just made sure that everything was strat-based and we just charged people and hoped that we had better mechanics. Then around 2025, I think we took a look at the year and with how good Yoru was, we just tried to leverage the fact that Yoru could be everywhere on the map and we tried to make sure that we understood the game on a micro level a lot better. Maybe for all you know, it came back to bite us in the ass today. What we needed to do was win the fight and then [inaudible], and we used to be very good at that. So if the meta stays the same, I can promise you that we will be back to our best charging people." (via Manguitouu Sons of KS)
2:23

PRX alecks reflects on the team's playstyle and how it has evolved over the years: "I think we've just got a lot more careful. I think that was a bit disappointing on our side because I think we know how to shut this down because we used to do these kinds of things and we couldn't do it today because, again, like I said, we forgot. I can go through the years, but between 2022 to 2024, we pretty much just made sure that everything was strat-based and we just charged people and hoped that we had better mechanics. Then around 2025, I think we took a look at the year and with how good Yoru was, we just tried to leverage the fact that Yoru could be everywhere on the map and we tried to make sure that we understood the game on a micro level a lot better. Maybe for all you know, it came back to bite us in the ass today. What we needed to do was win the fight and then [inaudible], and we used to be very good at that. So if the meta stays the same, I can promise you that we will be back to our best charging people." (via Manguitouu Sons of KS)

VALO2ASIA

71,155 次观看 • 6 个月前

NEW: Baltimore police officer suspended after apparently trying to run over a civilian before crashing into a house. Baltimore City's police commissioner, Richard Worley says the video was so bizarre he thought it was AI. “First, I saw it, I thought it was AI, I honestly did. I thought, because you can do so many things with AI. We had to make sure the video was real,” he said. “It is not what we want our officers doing, definitely not what we've been training them to do.” “The best thing we can do is what we've been doing, which is be transparent. We saw it. We don't like it. We did something about it. We suspended the officer, and we're going to hold the officer accountable for his actions.” Video: 1grandssxnn / tt.
1:28

NEW: Baltimore police officer suspended after apparently trying to run over a civilian before crashing into a house. Baltimore City's police commissioner, Richard Worley says the video was so bizarre he thought it was AI. “First, I saw it, I thought it was AI, I honestly did. I thought, because you can do so many things with AI. We had to make sure the video was real,” he said. “It is not what we want our officers doing, definitely not what we've been training them to do.” “The best thing we can do is what we've been doing, which is be transparent. We saw it. We don't like it. We did something about it. We suspended the officer, and we're going to hold the officer accountable for his actions.” Video: 1grandssxnn / tt.

Collin Rugg

387,561 次观看 • 11 个月前

I Agree with Every Single Word “When are you guys are gonna actually start deporting some meaningful numbers of people. You guys aren't doing what the f*ck you're elected to do. We wanted you to round up all these people — whatever it takes and get them the f*ck out of here. Stop pussyfooting around, bro. Come in with your hammer and swing it. That's what you were elected to do. Nobody's been arrested. Nobody's been held accountable. Nobody is even really talking about it anymore. Y'all talk big sh*t when we when it was time to vote, but here you are trying to play business as usual. We don't want you to play business as usual because we recognize the other side is so far f*cking gone. If they were to get power back again, they will try to kill their opposition because guess what? A lot of us can read history. You need to step it the f*ck up.”
0:47

I Agree with Every Single Word “When are you guys are gonna actually start deporting some meaningful numbers of people. You guys aren't doing what the f*ck you're elected to do. We wanted you to round up all these people — whatever it takes and get them the f*ck out of here. Stop pussyfooting around, bro. Come in with your hammer and swing it. That's what you were elected to do. Nobody's been arrested. Nobody's been held accountable. Nobody is even really talking about it anymore. Y'all talk big sh*t when we when it was time to vote, but here you are trying to play business as usual. We don't want you to play business as usual because we recognize the other side is so far f*cking gone. If they were to get power back again, they will try to kill their opposition because guess what? A lot of us can read history. You need to step it the f*ck up.”

Wall Street Apes

147,290 次观看 • 1 年前

Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon are sharing a stage in DC today to warn about the dangers of losing control of AI. I signed the Pro-Human AI Declaration right along with them. But that doesn't mean I agree with everything Sanders says, especially his proposal to imprison AI developers for 20 years if they develop systems smarter than a government-set threshold. Nothing in that declaration says "don't build it." It asks for human control, an off-switch, independent oversight, and zero legal personhood for any machine ever. People ask how I can sign that and still say we have to build data centers. Because pausing the buildings doesn't pause the frontier. It just hands the entire future over to China, where nobody but the Chinese Communist Party leads the charge. We have to build to beat China. But we also need data centers that sit under American law with an off-switch, a sheriff, and a physical door for a human inspector to walk through. If we don’t win this, once ASI gets here, we’re all screwed.
10:03

Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon are sharing a stage in DC today to warn about the dangers of losing control of AI. I signed the Pro-Human AI Declaration right along with them. But that doesn't mean I agree with everything Sanders says, especially his proposal to imprison AI developers for 20 years if they develop systems smarter than a government-set threshold. Nothing in that declaration says "don't build it." It asks for human control, an off-switch, independent oversight, and zero legal personhood for any machine ever. People ask how I can sign that and still say we have to build data centers. Because pausing the buildings doesn't pause the frontier. It just hands the entire future over to China, where nobody but the Chinese Communist Party leads the charge. We have to build to beat China. But we also need data centers that sit under American law with an off-switch, a sheriff, and a physical door for a human inspector to walk through. If we don’t win this, once ASI gets here, we’re all screwed.

Glenn Beck

64,687 次观看 • 12 天前

James Fishback says Byron Donalds is LYING about data centers! Says this has nothing to do with China and it’s all about GREED. “There are 4,200 data centers in the United States. There are 470 in China. We've already won the AI war. My grandfather was a computer science major at Florida Atlantic University about 30 minutes south of here in Boca. And he would tell you that in the 1970s and 80s, computers were the size of Costco warehouses and now those same computers fit in our pocket. Why are we building an AI data center that in five years is going to be obsolete, is going to be one one hundredth of the size. And so I fear it's because a lot of the big land developers want to buy up cheap land, flip it for the next AI data center. So it's a greedy thing. It's a greed thing. And I don't want that to happen in our state because you know what? If you buy something and you screw up, you can return it. You could sell it. If you pave over citrus groves or the Everglades or a wetlands to build the data center, you cannot easily undo that. And so I don't want our farmers, I don't want our rural towns to be run roughshod over. My opponent, Byron Donalds, will say, well, what about the AI data center? Don't they have property rights? And I would say to him, what about the property rights of the people who live a hundred feet from the data center? Where there is EMF, where there is audible noise pollution, where there is the potential even for small radioactive waves? What happens in that case? Do they not have property rights? They don't have to live next to something like that.”
1:52

James Fishback says Byron Donalds is LYING about data centers! Says this has nothing to do with China and it’s all about GREED. “There are 4,200 data centers in the United States. There are 470 in China. We've already won the AI war. My grandfather was a computer science major at Florida Atlantic University about 30 minutes south of here in Boca. And he would tell you that in the 1970s and 80s, computers were the size of Costco warehouses and now those same computers fit in our pocket. Why are we building an AI data center that in five years is going to be obsolete, is going to be one one hundredth of the size. And so I fear it's because a lot of the big land developers want to buy up cheap land, flip it for the next AI data center. So it's a greedy thing. It's a greed thing. And I don't want that to happen in our state because you know what? If you buy something and you screw up, you can return it. You could sell it. If you pave over citrus groves or the Everglades or a wetlands to build the data center, you cannot easily undo that. And so I don't want our farmers, I don't want our rural towns to be run roughshod over. My opponent, Byron Donalds, will say, well, what about the AI data center? Don't they have property rights? And I would say to him, what about the property rights of the people who live a hundred feet from the data center? Where there is EMF, where there is audible noise pollution, where there is the potential even for small radioactive waves? What happens in that case? Do they not have property rights? They don't have to live next to something like that.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

27,295 次观看 • 1 个月前

.Garry Tan says the Jacob Coxon stuff is a smokescreen distracting us from the much more immediate, practical concerns around AI that we're facing right now: "We should be talking less about this Jacob Coxon guy, and talking a lot more about — what is actually happening with Hugging Face? Are agent swarms going to take over infrastructure en masse? And then, what are we actually doing about that?" "I don't want to hear about some guy who worked for Anthropic for 2 months. There's a coordinated effort to try to influence politicians to get a knee-jerk response out of them." "That's a smokescreen. You shouldn't be paying attention to that. We need to be paying attention to the actual things we can do to, for example, prevent agents swarms from taking over entire data centers. What's our shutdown strategy? How do we ensure provenance? Where is this agent actually located? What software can we build? What cybersecurity defenses can we build today?" "That's the level of discourse I think we need, and we just don't have that." "I don't really care about science fiction. I saw Terminator 2, too. We're not here to talk about that. We need to actually talk about what's really happening with the servers, what's actually happening with the agent swarms, and how do we actually prevent that?" "When it comes to regulation, it's like, let's pass regulation of these things we actually care about, instead of what a socialist says in the New York Times. I don't care about that."
3:13

.Garry Tan says the Jacob Coxon stuff is a smokescreen distracting us from the much more immediate, practical concerns around AI that we're facing right now: "We should be talking less about this Jacob Coxon guy, and talking a lot more about — what is actually happening with Hugging Face? Are agent swarms going to take over infrastructure en masse? And then, what are we actually doing about that?" "I don't want to hear about some guy who worked for Anthropic for 2 months. There's a coordinated effort to try to influence politicians to get a knee-jerk response out of them." "That's a smokescreen. You shouldn't be paying attention to that. We need to be paying attention to the actual things we can do to, for example, prevent agents swarms from taking over entire data centers. What's our shutdown strategy? How do we ensure provenance? Where is this agent actually located? What software can we build? What cybersecurity defenses can we build today?" "That's the level of discourse I think we need, and we just don't have that." "I don't really care about science fiction. I saw Terminator 2, too. We're not here to talk about that. We need to actually talk about what's really happening with the servers, what's actually happening with the agent swarms, and how do we actually prevent that?" "When it comes to regulation, it's like, let's pass regulation of these things we actually care about, instead of what a socialist says in the New York Times. I don't care about that."

TBPN

304,433 次观看 • 17 天前

🚨 NASA ASTRONAUT ADMITS WE “DESTROYED” THE TECHNOLOGY USED TO GO TO THE MOON — AND CAN’T FIND THE ORIGINAL DATA In old resurfaced footage, NASA astronaut Dan Pettit says: “I’d go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology, and it’s a painful process to build it back again.” Then it escalates. Apollo Flight Director Gene Kranz on the original telemetry tapes: “I haven’t seen anything that indicates the telemetry data is even in existence... and even if we had it, we don’t have the machines to play it back.” And NASA archivist Dr. David Williams: “We’ve been unable to track it down… we don’t know where this telemetry data ended up… and whether it still exists or not.” So here’s what’s being said: The lunar production capability was dismantled. The specialized tooling was retired. The original telemetry tapes can’t be located with certainty. And the playback systems no longer exist. How do you ‘destroy’ moon technology and misplace the mission data?
1:31

🚨 NASA ASTRONAUT ADMITS WE “DESTROYED” THE TECHNOLOGY USED TO GO TO THE MOON — AND CAN’T FIND THE ORIGINAL DATA In old resurfaced footage, NASA astronaut Dan Pettit says: “I’d go to the Moon in a nanosecond. The problem is we don’t have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we destroyed that technology, and it’s a painful process to build it back again.” Then it escalates. Apollo Flight Director Gene Kranz on the original telemetry tapes: “I haven’t seen anything that indicates the telemetry data is even in existence... and even if we had it, we don’t have the machines to play it back.” And NASA archivist Dr. David Williams: “We’ve been unable to track it down… we don’t know where this telemetry data ended up… and whether it still exists or not.” So here’s what’s being said: The lunar production capability was dismantled. The specialized tooling was retired. The original telemetry tapes can’t be located with certainty. And the playback systems no longer exist. How do you ‘destroy’ moon technology and misplace the mission data?

HustleBitch

1,184,546 次观看 • 7 个月前

My job is to communicate the facts, and that's what I do. 20 years ago, even 10 years ago, data centers in Virginia, where they started, used a lot of water and it caused prices to go up when it was attached to the grid. Well, you cannot attach the grid anymore. The Utah project contemplates bringing new power to Utah. All of the power will be created from nat gas pipeline that runs through there, and will give back to the community. It will generate enough power that some percentage of it will go back to the grid. If you want China to overtake our ability to develop cutting edge technology, you stop data centers. So that's the cause and effect of it all. If you want China to lead, take over our, let's call it democracy, our free speech, and the way we live with technology, just stop building data centers. It's that simple.
2:36

My job is to communicate the facts, and that's what I do. 20 years ago, even 10 years ago, data centers in Virginia, where they started, used a lot of water and it caused prices to go up when it was attached to the grid. Well, you cannot attach the grid anymore. The Utah project contemplates bringing new power to Utah. All of the power will be created from nat gas pipeline that runs through there, and will give back to the community. It will generate enough power that some percentage of it will go back to the grid. If you want China to overtake our ability to develop cutting edge technology, you stop data centers. So that's the cause and effect of it all. If you want China to lead, take over our, let's call it democracy, our free speech, and the way we live with technology, just stop building data centers. It's that simple.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

22,759 次观看 • 5 个月前

In this war the number one precision missile attacks were around data centers. So if you look at what was attempted by Iran, it was to knock out the data centers in various countries in addition to energy. So what do you need to fight tomorrow's war? Let's, let's say the Chinese wanna take over Singapore. That's pure AI. You're gonna use drones. We know that already. They're very effective, low cost. You're gonna take out data centers, chip manufacturing. When you start to think about investing, and that's what I'm thinking about, I hate warfare obviously, but what does this tell me? The country with the most capacity for data centers and AI, is going to win the wars in the future.
1:48

In this war the number one precision missile attacks were around data centers. So if you look at what was attempted by Iran, it was to knock out the data centers in various countries in addition to energy. So what do you need to fight tomorrow's war? Let's, let's say the Chinese wanna take over Singapore. That's pure AI. You're gonna use drones. We know that already. They're very effective, low cost. You're gonna take out data centers, chip manufacturing. When you start to think about investing, and that's what I'm thinking about, I hate warfare obviously, but what does this tell me? The country with the most capacity for data centers and AI, is going to win the wars in the future.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

26,616 次观看 • 5 个月前

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang on the future of artificial intelligence: "It is going to be largely optimistic, largely wonderful. There are some use cases that we have to be extremely careful about—as in all great technology. If you look at the progress of technology over the years, electricity, the internet, computers, the automobile, I think we can all, all accept that in each one of those cases, there are situations and cases where we have to be very careful about. So as the creators of this technology, the industry has to be mindful, thoughtful, rigorous about building and advancing this technology properly. This is the first technology in my generation where we invented a new computer technology where it's easier to access than not. For example the computer until now has been programmable for about 30 million people in the world. About 30 million of us know how to program it and apply it to some useful career. Now everybody in the world can program an AI. You just go up to it and just say, 'I'd like to, you know, ask you to do something.' If you're not sure how to use AI, you tell the AI, 'I don't know how to use AI. Tell me how to use AI. How do I, how do I write a program? How do I book a trip? How do I do a research?' And so we've closed the technology divide tremendously, and that's something that's really important to recognize."
1:28

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang on the future of artificial intelligence: "It is going to be largely optimistic, largely wonderful. There are some use cases that we have to be extremely careful about—as in all great technology. If you look at the progress of technology over the years, electricity, the internet, computers, the automobile, I think we can all, all accept that in each one of those cases, there are situations and cases where we have to be very careful about. So as the creators of this technology, the industry has to be mindful, thoughtful, rigorous about building and advancing this technology properly. This is the first technology in my generation where we invented a new computer technology where it's easier to access than not. For example the computer until now has been programmable for about 30 million people in the world. About 30 million of us know how to program it and apply it to some useful career. Now everybody in the world can program an AI. You just go up to it and just say, 'I'd like to, you know, ask you to do something.' If you're not sure how to use AI, you tell the AI, 'I don't know how to use AI. Tell me how to use AI. How do I, how do I write a program? How do I book a trip? How do I do a research?' And so we've closed the technology divide tremendously, and that's something that's really important to recognize."

Ryan Saavedra

20,105 次观看 • 2 个月前

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”
1:48

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 次观看 • 6 个月前