Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

.David Sacks explains how the establishment uses hate speech as a red herring to mask their true intention of exerting political censorship and controlling the narrative: "What the left has wanted to do since Elon Musk took over Twitter is to say that this is about allowing more hate... on the platform, and that has never been the motivation for those of us who care about free speech... What is our main concern about censorship? It is political suppression. It's about narrative control. It's not like we want more hate on the platform. We want a level playing field. We don't want the thought police at Twitter putting their thumb on the scale of American democracy and deciding who has a voice and who doesn't. That's what this is really about. The people who believe in censorship want to make you think that this is about allowing more hate, and it's not."show more

KanekoaTheGreat

1,098,489 subscribers

2,174,969 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

.Elon Musk: "It's bizarre that we've come to this point where free speech used to be a liberal value. And yet we see from the 'left' a desire to censor. That seems crazy. I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment... We must protect free speech, and free speech is only relevant when it's someone you don't like saying something you don't like because, obviously, free speech that you like is easy. The thing about censorship is that for those who would advocate it, just remember at some point that will be turned on you."

.Elon Musk: "It's bizarre that we've come to this point where free speech used to be a liberal value. And yet we see from the 'left' a desire to censor. That seems crazy. I think we should be extremely concerned about anything that undermines the First Amendment... We must protect free speech, and free speech is only relevant when it's someone you don't like saying something you don't like because, obviously, free speech that you like is easy. The thing about censorship is that for those who would advocate it, just remember at some point that will be turned on you."

KanekoaTheGreat

5,749,466 views • 3 years ago

"My feeling is this. I'm not pro-immigration. I'm not anti-immigration. What I want is for people who are not corrupt, who are well-informed about the issue, to figure out what the best level of immigration is and to set up a process that works. I don't want to see any illegals. I want to see people who come in legally. I want to see the number. Maybe it's a high number. Maybe it's a low number. I don't know, but I'd like to see the right number. I'd like us to at least aspire to it. And then most important of all, and I see this in both England and the US, somewhere along the line, we apparently decided it was impolite to ask people who wished to come to our countries, whether they liked us and aspired to be a part of our civilization. And my feeling is whatever the number is that we should be allowing in, I don't want any who don't aspire to be American. I want people who like it, who want to make the place better and want to participate in it because they see it as good. We should not be letting people in who want to destroy it. Obviously, I can't imagine that anyone has to say that out loud, but apparently it has to be said out loud because it's not obvious to a lot of people. And the point is, it is what I just said anti-immigrant? No, it's anti-people who hate us. And I have a right to be anti-people who hate us..." - Bret Weinstein on immigration, with Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

"My feeling is this. I'm not pro-immigration. I'm not anti-immigration. What I want is for people who are not corrupt, who are well-informed about the issue, to figure out what the best level of immigration is and to set up a process that works. I don't want to see any illegals. I want to see people who come in legally. I want to see the number. Maybe it's a high number. Maybe it's a low number. I don't know, but I'd like to see the right number. I'd like us to at least aspire to it. And then most important of all, and I see this in both England and the US, somewhere along the line, we apparently decided it was impolite to ask people who wished to come to our countries, whether they liked us and aspired to be a part of our civilization. And my feeling is whatever the number is that we should be allowing in, I don't want any who don't aspire to be American. I want people who like it, who want to make the place better and want to participate in it because they see it as good. We should not be letting people in who want to destroy it. Obviously, I can't imagine that anyone has to say that out loud, but apparently it has to be said out loud because it's not obvious to a lot of people. And the point is, it is what I just said anti-immigrant? No, it's anti-people who hate us. And I have a right to be anti-people who hate us..." - Bret Weinstein on immigration, with Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

The Darkhorse Podcast

152,191 views • 6 months ago

VANCE: "I believe that we actually do have a threat to democracy in this country. But unfortunately, it's not the threat to democracy that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz want to talk about. It is the threat of censorship."

VANCE: "I believe that we actually do have a threat to democracy in this country. But unfortunately, it's not the threat to democracy that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz want to talk about. It is the threat of censorship."

Daily Wire

115,950 views • 1 year ago

This is one of the scenes from What Is A Woman that Twitter now says is hate speech. We will still stream the movie here tonight in its entirety at 8 ET. Twitter has the next 12 hours to decide whether they want to be a true free speech platform or not.

This is one of the scenes from What Is A Woman that Twitter now says is hate speech. We will still stream the movie here tonight in its entirety at 8 ET. Twitter has the next 12 hours to decide whether they want to be a true free speech platform or not.

Matt Walsh

2,092,325 views • 3 years ago

.Joe Rogan: "Liberals and progressives want the War in Ukraine to be funded. They want to censor speech online. They want to give the World Health Organization, which is deeply influenced by Big Pharma, control over what we take and don't take. That's crazy! That's not what the liberals were when I was a kid. My parents were hippies. We lived in San Francisco during the Vietnam War. The liberals always wanted education and open-mindedness. The liberals at the ACLU let the Nazis talk and have a rally. They said you can't infringe on people's free speech because if you infringe on the free speech of people you disagree with, you're being a hypocrite. The only solution to bad speech is better speech. We've always known that. Everyone has to be able to talk, and we have to figure out who is right because you might be wrong, and you might be clinging to this idea that you are right, and you're going to do the whole thing a terrible disservice. When you have people who are supposedly progressive and liberal, and they are opposed to the idea that free speech is an absolute right as an American citizen. It's very, very important because too many people can decide what you can and can't say. Like when Tim Walz was saying, 'Free speech doesn't apply to hate speech and misinformation.' Of course, it does. But first of all, you said misinformation. If that is the case, where is all the punishment for people who spread misinformation during COVID? Where's the call for accountability? It doesn't exist. It's not real because they don't really care about misinformation. They care about controlling information."

.Joe Rogan: "Liberals and progressives want the War in Ukraine to be funded. They want to censor speech online. They want to give the World Health Organization, which is deeply influenced by Big Pharma, control over what we take and don't take. That's crazy! That's not what the liberals were when I was a kid. My parents were hippies. We lived in San Francisco during the Vietnam War. The liberals always wanted education and open-mindedness. The liberals at the ACLU let the Nazis talk and have a rally. They said you can't infringe on people's free speech because if you infringe on the free speech of people you disagree with, you're being a hypocrite. The only solution to bad speech is better speech. We've always known that. Everyone has to be able to talk, and we have to figure out who is right because you might be wrong, and you might be clinging to this idea that you are right, and you're going to do the whole thing a terrible disservice. When you have people who are supposedly progressive and liberal, and they are opposed to the idea that free speech is an absolute right as an American citizen. It's very, very important because too many people can decide what you can and can't say. Like when Tim Walz was saying, 'Free speech doesn't apply to hate speech and misinformation.' Of course, it does. But first of all, you said misinformation. If that is the case, where is all the punishment for people who spread misinformation during COVID? Where's the call for accountability? It doesn't exist. It's not real because they don't really care about misinformation. They care about controlling information."

KanekoaTheGreat

12,569,121 views • 1 year ago

"The United States is, we are running out of patience, we believe that more and more it becomes a statement by the South African government when it doesn't want to respond to simple questions that we have" Ambassador L. Brent Bozell III "We may not get clarity on the kill the Boer chant that we believe is hate speech, I'm sorry I don't care what your court say it's hate speech, we believe that there is clarity on expropriation" Leo Brent Bozell III Video: Biznews

"The United States is, we are running out of patience, we believe that more and more it becomes a statement by the South African government when it doesn't want to respond to simple questions that we have" Ambassador L. Brent Bozell III "We may not get clarity on the kill the Boer chant that we believe is hate speech, I'm sorry I don't care what your court say it's hate speech, we believe that there is clarity on expropriation" Leo Brent Bozell III Video: Biznews

News Live SA

87,706 views • 4 months ago

#1 Elon Musk says the mission of Twitter 2.0 is to be the most reliable source of information and to provide citizens with a way to control the narrative: "The goal is to have Twitter be the best source of truth, the most timely and accurate source of truth, even if the truth is something we don't want to hear or unpleasant. Not just is something true or not, but what is the narrative. Most people don't appreciate that the media controls the narrative, so there are many things that could be talked about in the world, but only a few things can fit on the front page. But Twitter doesn't have a limitation like that, so the public can control the narrative, and the public can inform themselves as to what the narrative should be. That's a really big deal. It's a forum for citizen journalism or for the public to get together and communicate in a way that was never possible before so you can really know what's going on."

#1 Elon Musk says the mission of Twitter 2.0 is to be the most reliable source of information and to provide citizens with a way to control the narrative: "The goal is to have Twitter be the best source of truth, the most timely and accurate source of truth, even if the truth is something we don't want to hear or unpleasant. Not just is something true or not, but what is the narrative. Most people don't appreciate that the media controls the narrative, so there are many things that could be talked about in the world, but only a few things can fit on the front page. But Twitter doesn't have a limitation like that, so the public can control the narrative, and the public can inform themselves as to what the narrative should be. That's a really big deal. It's a forum for citizen journalism or for the public to get together and communicate in a way that was never possible before so you can really know what's going on."

KanekoaTheGreat

1,650,088 views • 3 years ago

James Harden on if the Clippers loss against the Wolves is deflating: “It's not just this game. It’s the Milwaukee game in Milwaukee. You look at the Laker game, like this [game]. I could point to a handful of games. It's not about another team. It's about us and that's what we preach and that's what it is. No matter who we play. And if we're healthy and our energy is right, it doesn't matter who we play.”

James Harden on if the Clippers loss against the Wolves is deflating: “It's not just this game. It’s the Milwaukee game in Milwaukee. You look at the Laker game, like this [game]. I could point to a handful of games. It's not about another team. It's about us and that's what we preach and that's what it is. No matter who we play. And if we're healthy and our energy is right, it doesn't matter who we play.”

Tomer Azarly

16,663 views • 2 years ago

"You mentioned at the top of your show that people think it's about the oil, some people think it's about this, some people that, the true answer is, you're kind of all right, you're just not putting it all together. Because yes, it is about oil, but not in the fact that we want to take the oil. We don't want our adversaries getting their hands on the #1—303 billion in oil reserves. They're #1 in the world, and that's not the Saudis, it's not the Iranians, it's the Venezuelans. And we do not want our adversaries to get a hold of that...and China was their largest purchaser of oil exports. China was. I don't think that's going to continue any longer." -Jason Buttrill, Head Writer and Chief Researcher for The Glenn Beck Program

"You mentioned at the top of your show that people think it's about the oil, some people think it's about this, some people that, the true answer is, you're kind of all right, you're just not putting it all together. Because yes, it is about oil, but not in the fact that we want to take the oil. We don't want our adversaries getting their hands on the #1—303 billion in oil reserves. They're #1 in the world, and that's not the Saudis, it's not the Iranians, it's the Venezuelans. And we do not want our adversaries to get a hold of that...and China was their largest purchaser of oil exports. China was. I don't think that's going to continue any longer." -Jason Buttrill, Head Writer and Chief Researcher for The Glenn Beck Program

Liz Wheeler

15,551 views • 6 months ago

If we don’t think, we can’t progress. In recent years, there has been a trend to silence people. The freedom of thought is gradually being replaced by censorship and self-censorship. I believe that Zuckerberg’s decision is a service to democracy. The future of democracy depends on people’s ability to think freely and to express their opinions freely. And that is not possible nowadays. Those who think differently are seen as the devil, are excluded, and many people no longer dare to share their ideas. The European Commission need to check what can be improved in our laws to protect free speech, fight desinformation and tackle crime at the same time. EU must focus on what we can do for people instead of being distracted. I joined politics to fight for free speech and women’s rights and tackle organised crime and that is what I will do. This was my message today in a tv debate about social media. 👇🏾#7dag Assita Kanko

If we don’t think, we can’t progress. In recent years, there has been a trend to silence people. The freedom of thought is gradually being replaced by censorship and self-censorship. I believe that Zuckerberg’s decision is a service to democracy. The future of democracy depends on people’s ability to think freely and to express their opinions freely. And that is not possible nowadays. Those who think differently are seen as the devil, are excluded, and many people no longer dare to share their ideas. The European Commission need to check what can be improved in our laws to protect free speech, fight desinformation and tackle crime at the same time. EU must focus on what we can do for people instead of being distracted. I joined politics to fight for free speech and women’s rights and tackle organised crime and that is what I will do. This was my message today in a tv debate about social media. 👇🏾#7dag Assita Kanko

Assita Kanko MEP

20,381 views • 1 year ago

This is interesting. Usually it's the political opponents of the speaker that clip them to make them look more extreme. Not supporters. In Vance's full take which is about 10 minutes long he draws a clear line between left and far left, and those who support political violence vs those who do not. He thinks this problem is far more prevalent on the left but says most on the left do not support violence. Don't know if Nick edited the way he did intentionally or not. I edited some of it here for you to see what I'm talking about. Full clip below starts at 1:49:38 if you want to see the whole thing I know a lot of people on the left will still hate the speech because of not talking about issues on the right and framing it as only a left problem, but the way the clip is making the rounds made me think Vance's rhetoric was far more extreme and incendiary than it was.

This is interesting. Usually it's the political opponents of the speaker that clip them to make them look more extreme. Not supporters. In Vance's full take which is about 10 minutes long he draws a clear line between left and far left, and those who support political violence vs those who do not. He thinks this problem is far more prevalent on the left but says most on the left do not support violence. Don't know if Nick edited the way he did intentionally or not. I edited some of it here for you to see what I'm talking about. Full clip below starts at 1:49:38 if you want to see the whole thing I know a lot of people on the left will still hate the speech because of not talking about issues on the right and framing it as only a left problem, but the way the clip is making the rounds made me think Vance's rhetoric was far more extreme and incendiary than it was.

PSA Sitch🚸

49,798 views • 9 months ago

NEW: Australian Senator Jacqui Lambie calls for the imprisonment of Elon Musk for allowing free speech on X. Tyrants hate when someone takes away their power to muzzle their citizens. “Elon Musk has no social conscience or conscience whatsoever.” “That is absolutely disgusting behavior and quite frankly, the bloke who should be jailed. And the sooner that we can bring rules in or do something about this sort of, this sort of game playing with our social media, the better off we're going to be.” “But quite frankly, the power that man has because of that platform that he's on, it's gotta stop. It has absolutely got to stop.”

NEW: Australian Senator Jacqui Lambie calls for the imprisonment of Elon Musk for allowing free speech on X. Tyrants hate when someone takes away their power to muzzle their citizens. “Elon Musk has no social conscience or conscience whatsoever.” “That is absolutely disgusting behavior and quite frankly, the bloke who should be jailed. And the sooner that we can bring rules in or do something about this sort of, this sort of game playing with our social media, the better off we're going to be.” “But quite frankly, the power that man has because of that platform that he's on, it's gotta stop. It has absolutely got to stop.”

Collin Rugg

2,796,702 views • 2 years ago

🚨 GLOBAL SPEECH CONTROL AGENDA The United Nations is now openly calling for “coordinated global action” to police what it labels disinformation and hate speech online. Let that sink in. An unelected international body — with no democratic mandate over sovereign citizens — is proposing frameworks to regulate what billions of people are allowed to say, share, and believe on digital platforms. This is not about protecting truth. It is about controlling narrative. History shows that the institutions most eager to define “misinformation” are often the same ones that were wrong — or dishonest — about: • Wars • Public health policies • Economic decisions • Political legitimacy The danger is not false information alone. The danger is centralised authority deciding what counts as truth. Once speech is governed at a global level, dissent itself becomes a violation. The real question is no longer whether misinformation exists. The real question is: Who gets to decide what is true — and who gets silenced?

🚨 GLOBAL SPEECH CONTROL AGENDA The United Nations is now openly calling for “coordinated global action” to police what it labels disinformation and hate speech online. Let that sink in. An unelected international body — with no democratic mandate over sovereign citizens — is proposing frameworks to regulate what billions of people are allowed to say, share, and believe on digital platforms. This is not about protecting truth. It is about controlling narrative. History shows that the institutions most eager to define “misinformation” are often the same ones that were wrong — or dishonest — about: • Wars • Public health policies • Economic decisions • Political legitimacy The danger is not false information alone. The danger is centralised authority deciding what counts as truth. Once speech is governed at a global level, dissent itself becomes a violation. The real question is no longer whether misinformation exists. The real question is: Who gets to decide what is true — and who gets silenced?

Jim Ferguson

245,094 views • 4 months ago

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

115,251 views • 1 year ago

Sen. Kelly: “This is about a president who doesn't want anybody to say anything that he does not like. I don't think he understands the Constitution. I think he is ignorant to the Constitution and the rule of law…This isn't about me. This is about what he will do next.”

Sen. Kelly: “This is about a president who doesn't want anybody to say anything that he does not like. I don't think he understands the Constitution. I think he is ignorant to the Constitution and the rule of law…This isn't about me. This is about what he will do next.”

The Bulwark

42,032 views • 7 months ago

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

ELON CLIPS

1,266,059 views • 1 year ago

NEW: Bill Maher says he will NEVER hate Elon Musk, despite relentless pressure from the left. “I will never hate him.” Maher says, “I don't want any part of this America” where people tell me who to hate. “Another thing I really hate about the far-left types is that they hate me because I won't hate someone else...” “They're mad at me that I won't hate Elon Musk now. Cause, I mean, he has gone completely conservative. You know, he's contributing to Trump and everything. But, no, I'm sorry. I don't hate him, and I will never hate him. I'd love to talk to him about it, and we might. I mean, I've talked to him many times, but this 'I hate you because you don't hate someone who's on our list of the deplorables who we hate.' I don't want any part of this America.”

NEW: Bill Maher says he will NEVER hate Elon Musk, despite relentless pressure from the left. “I will never hate him.” Maher says, “I don't want any part of this America” where people tell me who to hate. “Another thing I really hate about the far-left types is that they hate me because I won't hate someone else...” “They're mad at me that I won't hate Elon Musk now. Cause, I mean, he has gone completely conservative. You know, he's contributing to Trump and everything. But, no, I'm sorry. I don't hate him, and I will never hate him. I'd love to talk to him about it, and we might. I mean, I've talked to him many times, but this 'I hate you because you don't hate someone who's on our list of the deplorables who we hate.' I don't want any part of this America.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,204,727 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk and Bill Maher discuss the Woke Mind Virus and free speech. “I can’t emphasize this enough. We must protect free speech… the thing about censorship, for those who advocate for it, at some point that will be turned on you.” The woke mind virus “has been going on for awhile. The amount of indoctrination going on in schools and universities is more than parents realize.” Love this 🔥

Elon Musk and Bill Maher discuss the Woke Mind Virus and free speech. “I can’t emphasize this enough. We must protect free speech… the thing about censorship, for those who advocate for it, at some point that will be turned on you.” The woke mind virus “has been going on for awhile. The amount of indoctrination going on in schools and universities is more than parents realize.” Love this 🔥

Collin Rugg

5,030,172 views • 3 years ago