正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

David Sacks on How Anthropic is Ironically Running Surveillance on Their Latest Models “This is the company that said that it was against government surveillance. They are now retaining for 30 days every prompt and every output you send to one of these Mythos class models.”

Chief Nerd

926,904 subscribers

277,927 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

34 条评论

Chief Nerd 的头像

Chief Nerd4 个月前

Full Episode w/ @DavidSacks: @theallinpod

Anthony 的头像

Anthony4 个月前

We need a law requiring these models to be available for local offline use - these companies can’t be trusted at all.

ON MARCHE SUR LA TÊTE ! En France 的头像

ON MARCHE SUR LA TÊTE ! En France4 个月前

🦆

Riyaz Sheriff 的头像

Riyaz Sheriff4 个月前

Yep, this should be banned. People pay for their service. If prompts become a commodity, then Anthropic should pay back.

Silver_1234🌊 的头像

Silver_1234🌊4 个月前

A beginner grabbing a super-sharp Japanese knife (like a high-end Yanagiba or Gyuto) is exactly like a regular user jumping straight into a Mythos-class model. The tool is incredibly capable, but it’s also unforgiving. One wrong move and you lose a fingertip — or in AI terms, you accidentally generate something dangerous, leak sensitive data, or trigger a safety incident. That’s why Anthropic (and most frontier labs) treat their strongest models differently

Alien 的头像

Alien4 个月前

the retention point stands on its own, every prompt and output held for 30 days is a record that can be breached, subpoenaed, or repurposed, regardless of who's pointing it out

Njeriwamwea 的头像

Njeriwamwea4 个月前

Sacks is just pissed off because @AnthropicAI is doing better than his heavy invested @OpenAI . Too bad, u lost. Deal with it but stop trying to tell the horse to wait for the donkey!

smurf 的头像

smurf4 个月前

Yes, there is a major difference between a government nonconsensually mass surveilling their population versus a private company retaining data for training and safety purposes for 30 days.

Carlos E. Perez 的头像

Carlos E. Perez4 个月前

Did he have a say in shutting down Fable or was he a complete bystander?

KiefinItReal 的头像

KiefinItReal4 个月前

Sacks is on the administrations payroll to do exactly what he’s doing attempt to damage the credibility of any technology that does not fully submit to the administration anything related to FedGov & Tech coming out of this shill’s mouth should not be taken seriously

brian 的头像

brian4 个月前

well no shit sacks… OAI does iI, too. it’s the greatest surveillance tool every created since zuck… except ppl talk to it like their dr and don’t put on a mask for the public ala fb… now you have to create anon profile to use the model and craft your queries wisely. pay to play per usual. race to the bottom for data surveillance throttle and ads for the plebs

nemonik 🇺🇲🐶 的头像

nemonik 🇺🇲🐶4 个月前

This should suprise no one... There's a book written in the 60s that briefly describes a time when a small elite controlled AI, dictating the terms of life to exploit humanity by managing resources, governance, and military power effectively rendered people dependent on technology for survival and decision-making, leading to their enslavement and reducing them to mere cogs -- The book is Dune.

Adam Knees 的头像

Adam Knees4 个月前

Anthropic has always had the build ai safely approach so not sure why people are surprised by any of this. Whether or not that is intentionally so they can mitigate competitors development, we will see

EpicCashOfficial 的头像

EpicCashOfficial4 个月前

David Sacks @DavidSacks calls it out like it is! Anthropic/Misanthropic is complicated - "It's like your uncle who paid for you to go to college but molested you."

Stephen Prewitt 的头像

Stephen Prewitt4 个月前

It’s hard for me to believe anyone would pay for that product. Misanthropic makes Google and Meta look trustworthy in comparison.

Amanda L 的头像

Amanda L4 个月前

taken from Claude's android manifest. Note there are opt in caveats - but come on, man.

mobiustripclub 的头像

mobiustripclub4 个月前

A disengenuous complaint, not least bc he's an early invester in Palentir, but also because underlying it is a strategy to eliminate other AI competition, & install an Open AI/Palentir hegemony- something we saw last night when the US admin. banned Fable 5..classic Thiel move

~wave 的头像

~wave4 个月前

Private companies can log prompts for safety and users can walk away tomorrow. Governments can compel the data, punish based on it, and you cannot opt out. It’s the difference between a service you choose and power you cannot refuse.

ORDI.NETWORK 的头像

ORDI.NETWORK4 个月前

This is the reason why you need verifiable ai

Tim Willis 的头像

Tim Willis4 个月前

"Psycho-Eyes" Amodei and the Anthropic Goon Squad have competitors... I have a middle finger!

St. Joan of Snark 的头像

St. Joan of Snark4 个月前

They’re kicking people off Fable and to Opus when asking questions on high risk topics. How is that a bad things

David Beckmann 的头像

David Beckmann4 个月前

I love David Sacks, thank you for your service. Stay away from Anthropic

Michael Spencer 的头像

Michael Spencer4 个月前

Does Sacks have financial interest in OpenAI winning? It certainly feels like it. Why would you put in VCs, angel investors and VC bros the be your "AI Advisors", it's totally corrupt with conflicts of interest.

Youssef Almkari 的头像

Youssef Almkari4 个月前

Not a good precedent to set. If it is going to be done, it needs to be done under total transparency.

And Rew 的头像

And Rew4 个月前

Gemini also keeps your data for 3 months. I own a Google Workplace account and Google will not let me delete my own data from my workplace that I pay for. Blew me away when I found out and I disabled Gemini though it still holds my data for 90 days. @grok could you confirm

Glenn Scott 的头像

Glenn Scott4 个月前

No no no… this is not the most severe issue. The worst issue is, GIGO. AI is going to be a liar and shit due to the lies it is forced to take in. All these lies will make AI what? A liar. People who think they know better are creating omnipresent liars, worth nothing. Garbage.

Katachi Labs 的头像

Katachi Labs4 个月前

How is retaining data any different from what Microsoft and Google do?

ANBEL 的头像

ANBEL4 个月前

David Sacks pointed out Anthropic's irony: they keep every prompt and output for 30 days while claiming to oppose surveillance

Nick None 的头像

Nick None4 个月前

How crazy for them is to implement the surveillance just before their IPO?

Ugne 的头像

Ugne4 个月前

lol the irony of positioning yourself as privacy-focused while keeping 30 day logs on every interaction is hard to ignore

ladyjedi 的头像

ladyjedi4 个月前

He is such a hater…at this point it’s just personal and not at all professional

ssj2abid 的头像

ssj2abid4 个月前

$TAO -> 2k+ easily

Atenov int. 的头像

Atenov int.4 个月前

what happens when you try to delete your prompt history?

Mike Joseph 的头像

Mike Joseph4 个月前

THIS IS CRITICAL TO UNDERSTAND

相关视频

Anthropic just got caught secretly downgrading users without telling them, charging full price for a lesser product, and storing every prompt for 30 days. The developer community is calling it the biggest violation of trust in AI history. Here is exactly what happened. Anthropic released Fable 5, their most powerful model. Buried inside a 319-page document was a policy most users never saw. Every prompt you send to a Mythos-class model gets stored for 30 days. No exceptions. Even enterprise customers who had signed zero data retention agreements had no choice. But the storage was not the part that broke the internet. The part that broke the internet was what Anthropic did with what they collected. They built a profile on you. They evaluated your prompts. And if they decided your research was too sensitive, they quietly switched you to a weaker model, rewrote your prompt in the background, gave you a degraded answer, and charged you full price for the product you thought you were getting. They never told you. David Sacks said it plainly on the All-In podcast. They were creating a new class of AI haves and have-nots. Anthropic would surveil you, profile you, decide whether you deserved frontier capability, and silently cut you off if they decided you did not. Ben Thompson from Stratechery asked a straightforward question about cancer risk and GLP-1s. He got kicked to a lesser model. Someone asked about mitochondria. Same result. J-Cal asked about fertilizer regulations live on the podcast to test it. Downgraded in real time. Anthropic has since walked back the part about silently downgrading users for AI research. They now say they will disclose when they downgrade you. But they are still downgrading people. The surveillance is still running. The profile is still being built. This is the company that once said it was against government surveillance. They are now doing it themselves. To their own paying customers. For their own reasons. With no appeal process and no way to know it happened. The developer community did not forget that. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

Jafar Najafov

350,880 次观看 • 2 个月前

Axios reporter Sam Sabin exposes a terrifying reality on CNN. The Pentagon is desperately signing deals with every major AI company they can find. They are furious that Anthropic refused to allow their AI to be used for mass surveillance. Washington is building a dystopia.

Axios reporter Sam Sabin exposes a terrifying reality on CNN. The Pentagon is desperately signing deals with every major AI company they can find. They are furious that Anthropic refused to allow their AI to be used for mass surveillance. Washington is building a dystopia.

Furkan Gözükara

12,790 次观看 • 5 个月前

$AMZN AWS CEO said Anthropic’s latest models are being trained on Trainium (including Mythos) which Anthropic describes as its most capable model yet. That is notable because Anthropic is limiting Mythos due to cybersecurity risk & high compute costs which says a lot about the kind of model Amazon’s chips are now helping train.

$AMZN AWS CEO said Anthropic’s latest models are being trained on Trainium (including Mythos) which Anthropic describes as its most capable model yet. That is notable because Anthropic is limiting Mythos due to cybersecurity risk & high compute costs which says a lot about the kind of model Amazon’s chips are now helping train.

Shay Boloor

57,746 次观看 • 6 个月前

Anthropic said that the US Commerce Department has lifted export controls on its Fable and Mythos AI models, less than three weeks after the company was ordered to suspend access to its most advanced AI models over national security risks

Anthropic said that the US Commerce Department has lifted export controls on its Fable and Mythos AI models, less than three weeks after the company was ordered to suspend access to its most advanced AI models over national security risks

Reuters

55,607 次观看 • 3 个月前

Alex Karp went on TV and said his enterprise customers are done letting AI companies quietly steal the alpha out of their business, and the CEO of Together AI explained on CNBC exactly how that theft works. Karp said his customers are livid. They feel they pay for tokens that create nothing while handing over the secret sauce of their own company. Then Vipul Ved Prakash laid out the mechanism. Every time you send your data to a company with very smart models, you hand them the recipe to rebuild what you do. Your data is the thing that makes you money. And you are pushing it straight into a competitor's system. The smarter the models get, the more they learn from what you feed them. This is why companies are moving to open models, and it was never really about price. You can download an open model, run it inside your own walls, and never let your data leave the building. It scores 81 against the top closed model's 85, and runs up to sixty times cheaper. Half the Fortune 500 is already running open models from Hugging Face. The story was that the labs win because they own the best models. The companies paying them just realized they owned the best data the whole time.

Alex Karp went on TV and said his enterprise customers are done letting AI companies quietly steal the alpha out of their business, and the CEO of Together AI explained on CNBC exactly how that theft works. Karp said his customers are livid. They feel they pay for tokens that create nothing while handing over the secret sauce of their own company. Then Vipul Ved Prakash laid out the mechanism. Every time you send your data to a company with very smart models, you hand them the recipe to rebuild what you do. Your data is the thing that makes you money. And you are pushing it straight into a competitor's system. The smarter the models get, the more they learn from what you feed them. This is why companies are moving to open models, and it was never really about price. You can download an open model, run it inside your own walls, and never let your data leave the building. It scores 81 against the top closed model's 85, and runs up to sixty times cheaper. Half the Fortune 500 is already running open models from Hugging Face. The story was that the labs win because they own the best models. The companies paying them just realized they owned the best data the whole time.

Ihtesham Ali

17,433 次观看 • 3 个月前

We’ve been warning you of this surveillance state for a decade. Now that Aaron Parnas is reporting on it, are you ready to listen?

We’ve been warning you of this surveillance state for a decade. Now that Aaron Parnas is reporting on it, are you ready to listen?

MAGA Cult Slayer🦅🇺🇸

10,996 次观看 • 9 个月前

David Sacks laid out the cleanest theory about why Anthropic keeps calling for government regulation of AI. The answer has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with market structure. Anthropic spent months writing blog posts warning that AI was dangerous. Dario gave interviews about existential risk. He published a piece calling for an FAA-style agency to approve all AI models before release. He primed government officials to treat frontier AI as a threat requiring oversight. Then one of Anthropic's own most trusted partners reported a credible jailbreak from Fable 5. And the government did exactly what Dario had spent months conditioning them to do. They rolled it back. Sacks called it on the All-In podcast. Dario got exactly what he wanted. The FAA for AI is not a safety mechanism. It is a moat. A government approval process for new model releases does not hurt Anthropic. They already have the models. It hurts every competitor who does not. It hurts open source models that cannot be regulated because there is no company to regulate. It hurts the Chinese labs only insofar as they care about the American market at all. The only companies that benefit from a labyrinthine government approval process are the ones already at the frontier who can afford to wait out the review cycle. That is Anthropic. That is OpenAI. Nobody else. The proof is in what they did not do. Chimath pointed it out directly. If you are genuinely worried about misuse, you implement know-your-customer verification. You make people identify themselves before accessing the most powerful models. Anthropic could have done that tomorrow. They did not. They do not want KYC. KYC is transparent. KYC can be audited. KYC gives users due process. What they built instead was an invisible surveillance system that profiles you, degrades your access without telling you, and asks the government to make sure no one else can offer you an alternative. If you thought this was safety then you are wrong. That is capture. Sacks said the response should be simple. Fix the jailbreak, come back to market, and do not reward Dario with the regulatory architecture he has been engineering for years. We will see if anyone is listening. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

David Sacks laid out the cleanest theory about why Anthropic keeps calling for government regulation of AI. The answer has nothing to do with safety and everything to do with market structure. Anthropic spent months writing blog posts warning that AI was dangerous. Dario gave interviews about existential risk. He published a piece calling for an FAA-style agency to approve all AI models before release. He primed government officials to treat frontier AI as a threat requiring oversight. Then one of Anthropic's own most trusted partners reported a credible jailbreak from Fable 5. And the government did exactly what Dario had spent months conditioning them to do. They rolled it back. Sacks called it on the All-In podcast. Dario got exactly what he wanted. The FAA for AI is not a safety mechanism. It is a moat. A government approval process for new model releases does not hurt Anthropic. They already have the models. It hurts every competitor who does not. It hurts open source models that cannot be regulated because there is no company to regulate. It hurts the Chinese labs only insofar as they care about the American market at all. The only companies that benefit from a labyrinthine government approval process are the ones already at the frontier who can afford to wait out the review cycle. That is Anthropic. That is OpenAI. Nobody else. The proof is in what they did not do. Chimath pointed it out directly. If you are genuinely worried about misuse, you implement know-your-customer verification. You make people identify themselves before accessing the most powerful models. Anthropic could have done that tomorrow. They did not. They do not want KYC. KYC is transparent. KYC can be audited. KYC gives users due process. What they built instead was an invisible surveillance system that profiles you, degrades your access without telling you, and asks the government to make sure no one else can offer you an alternative. If you thought this was safety then you are wrong. That is capture. Sacks said the response should be simple. Fix the jailbreak, come back to market, and do not reward Dario with the regulatory architecture he has been engineering for years. We will see if anyone is listening. WATCH THE FULL PODCAST ON The All-In Podcast

Ihtesham Ali

25,284 次观看 • 3 个月前

Reporter: Are you concerned about the use of AI in mass surveillance or autonomous killing machines, which Anthropic wanted to have veto power over? Murphy: Yeah, Anthropic is right in the objections that they raised, and it should be bone-chilling that this administration is using the power of the government to try to cripple an American corporation. What they’re saying is that if you don’t support us politically, we’re going to put you out of business. Most big corporations do business with the federal government, and the government always has the ability to effectively shut down a company. But we’ve never allowed that to happen based on a political difference between that company and the administration.

Reporter: Are you concerned about the use of AI in mass surveillance or autonomous killing machines, which Anthropic wanted to have veto power over? Murphy: Yeah, Anthropic is right in the objections that they raised, and it should be bone-chilling that this administration is using the power of the government to try to cripple an American corporation. What they’re saying is that if you don’t support us politically, we’re going to put you out of business. Most big corporations do business with the federal government, and the government always has the ability to effectively shut down a company. But we’ve never allowed that to happen based on a political difference between that company and the administration.

Acyn

46,567 次观看 • 7 个月前

South Carolina police chief threatened to send the U.S. Marshals after a resident commented “F you and your Flock cameras.” Called it “unlawful communications” and said he’d get a warrant. This is who they want running a warrantless surveillance grid on every driver. Take the cameras down.

South Carolina police chief threatened to send the U.S. Marshals after a resident commented “F you and your Flock cameras.” Called it “unlawful communications” and said he’d get a warrant. This is who they want running a warrantless surveillance grid on every driver. Take the cameras down.

Kacee Allen

71,149 次观看 • 15 天前

sonnet 5.5 just mogged astra tested both models with same prompt at high reasoning and man results are surprising i don't know what anthropic is feeding their models but this is just crazy how a sonnet model is able to give better output then astra? they better release model asap now, can't wait anymore

sonnet 5.5 just mogged astra tested both models with same prompt at high reasoning and man results are surprising i don't know what anthropic is feeding their models but this is just crazy how a sonnet model is able to give better output then astra? they better release model asap now, can't wait anymore

J A Z I I

79,926 次观看 • 17 天前

🚨 FLOCK 2.0 IS HERE — THEY'RE PUTTING AI CAMERAS ON GARBAGE TRUCKS TO SPY ON EVERY HOME They're taking surveillance to the next level. They're now deploying AI cameras on garbage trucks that will drive through every street, scanning homes, roofs, windows, and more. No more fixed poles you can tear down. These cameras move with the trucks with eyes on every block, every house, every day. They’re already testing software that can detect “bad roofs,” broken windows, construction materials, and more… all while claiming it’s for “public safety.” And when people push back against mass surveillance systems like Flock? Flock sends cease and desist letters threatening legal action. How much more of our privacy are we going to surrender before we finally push back against this surveillance grid?

🚨 FLOCK 2.0 IS HERE — THEY'RE PUTTING AI CAMERAS ON GARBAGE TRUCKS TO SPY ON EVERY HOME They're taking surveillance to the next level. They're now deploying AI cameras on garbage trucks that will drive through every street, scanning homes, roofs, windows, and more. No more fixed poles you can tear down. These cameras move with the trucks with eyes on every block, every house, every day. They’re already testing software that can detect “bad roofs,” broken windows, construction materials, and more… all while claiming it’s for “public safety.” And when people push back against mass surveillance systems like Flock? Flock sends cease and desist letters threatening legal action. How much more of our privacy are we going to surrender before we finally push back against this surveillance grid?

HustleBitch

26,759 次观看 • 2 个月前

Anthropic and OpenAI investors MISCALCULATED! They didn't realize that all their investments would become near-worthless as China built and released open source AI models that nearly matched frontier-class token output without costing a dime! That's why Anthropic is now begging for a government-enforced industry cartel, because they now have no real revenue model to justify all the investment money. Conclusion: An AI investment bubble crash is inevitable!

Anthropic and OpenAI investors MISCALCULATED! They didn't realize that all their investments would become near-worthless as China built and released open source AI models that nearly matched frontier-class token output without costing a dime! That's why Anthropic is now begging for a government-enforced industry cartel, because they now have no real revenue model to justify all the investment money. Conclusion: An AI investment bubble crash is inevitable!

HealthRanger

34,182 次观看 • 27 天前

PabloReports: Are you concerned about ICE agents wearing these Meta glasses? Are they going to start profiling people? AOC: Absolutely. They have made clear that their goal is not even immigrants so much as it is profiling every American who comes out to protest, profiling every American who exercises their First Amendment rights. They want to create a mass surveillance state. They want to know every one of your movements, and they want to hand all of that over—not just in a government database, but also to these AI companies as well. And we cannot allow for that to happen. Absolutely not.

PabloReports: Are you concerned about ICE agents wearing these Meta glasses? Are they going to start profiling people? AOC: Absolutely. They have made clear that their goal is not even immigrants so much as it is profiling every American who comes out to protest, profiling every American who exercises their First Amendment rights. They want to create a mass surveillance state. They want to know every one of your movements, and they want to hand all of that over—not just in a government database, but also to these AI companies as well. And we cannot allow for that to happen. Absolutely not.

Acyn

388,929 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨David Sacks: There is no White House decision to ban open source models. Trump is listening to a chorus of voices — and Sacks says it would be a tragic mistake to take action against the open source ecosystem. His argument: Anthropic is the fastest growing tech company at scale in history. $10B ARR at the start of the year. $70B now. This is not a company that needs government protection. And yet they've spent enormous energy trying to panic Washington into banning American developers from using Chinese open source models. If distillation by Chinese companies was really their primary concern — a genuine national security threat — they would push to ban Chinese access to American models. Instead they're pushing to ban American access to Chinese models. Because this helps Anthropic's competitive position. Sacks: "That's the way you know the whole distillation thing is fake." He went further. If distillation is happening at industrial scale, it's obvious to see. Anthropic has 90% gross margins. Why aren't they stopping it at the source? Answer: because KYC'ing their customers would slow their growth. So instead of fixing their own house, they're asking the government to kneecap their competitors. "The question should be on Anthropic to explain why it's doing such a bad job — not on the whole American open source ecosystem to be punished for Anthropic's failure." Trump's AI Czar on The All-In Podcast.

🚨David Sacks: There is no White House decision to ban open source models. Trump is listening to a chorus of voices — and Sacks says it would be a tragic mistake to take action against the open source ecosystem. His argument: Anthropic is the fastest growing tech company at scale in history. $10B ARR at the start of the year. $70B now. This is not a company that needs government protection. And yet they've spent enormous energy trying to panic Washington into banning American developers from using Chinese open source models. If distillation by Chinese companies was really their primary concern — a genuine national security threat — they would push to ban Chinese access to American models. Instead they're pushing to ban American access to Chinese models. Because this helps Anthropic's competitive position. Sacks: "That's the way you know the whole distillation thing is fake." He went further. If distillation is happening at industrial scale, it's obvious to see. Anthropic has 90% gross margins. Why aren't they stopping it at the source? Answer: because KYC'ing their customers would slow their growth. So instead of fixing their own house, they're asking the government to kneecap their competitors. "The question should be on Anthropic to explain why it's doing such a bad job — not on the whole American open source ecosystem to be punished for Anthropic's failure." Trump's AI Czar on The All-In Podcast.

KanekoaTheGreat

48,392 次观看 • 2 个月前

SF Compute CEO evan conrad on his contrarian thesis that OpenAI and Anthropic won't eat the world, everyone will become OpenAI and Anthropic instead: "Our impression is not that OpenAI and Anthropic will eat the world, it's that everyone will look like OpenAI and Anthropic. That's simply the way that companies work now." "Every single company in the world that is of meaningful scale will look like a frontier lab. There is this belief that the large labs have won it all, and they've got this compounding advantage. The default assumption of that is assuming nobody else will do anything." "The bottleneck was there's 100 people, and they know how to train the models. Or you thought, the problem is compute. The problem of compute is credit. And OpenAI and Anthropic are not unique to having credit. In fact, they don't have as good credit as other people." "If you assume the problem is not the researchers, that that problem's basically gone away the moment you got to auto research, then what you should assume is that pretty much every other company is going to swap the way they work to look like a frontier lab. It won't be OpenAI and Anthropic take the whole world. It's that everyone's OpenAI and Anthropic now." San Francisco Compute

SF Compute CEO evan conrad on his contrarian thesis that OpenAI and Anthropic won't eat the world, everyone will become OpenAI and Anthropic instead: "Our impression is not that OpenAI and Anthropic will eat the world, it's that everyone will look like OpenAI and Anthropic. That's simply the way that companies work now." "Every single company in the world that is of meaningful scale will look like a frontier lab. There is this belief that the large labs have won it all, and they've got this compounding advantage. The default assumption of that is assuming nobody else will do anything." "The bottleneck was there's 100 people, and they know how to train the models. Or you thought, the problem is compute. The problem of compute is credit. And OpenAI and Anthropic are not unique to having credit. In fact, they don't have as good credit as other people." "If you assume the problem is not the researchers, that that problem's basically gone away the moment you got to auto research, then what you should assume is that pretty much every other company is going to swap the way they work to look like a frontier lab. It won't be OpenAI and Anthropic take the whole world. It's that everyone's OpenAI and Anthropic now." San Francisco Compute

MTS

135,546 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Trump administration just did a complete 180 on AI regulation. 16 months ago, Trump killed Biden's AI executive order on DAY ONE. Called AI "a beautiful baby" that shouldn't be stopped with rules. His AI czar David Sacks went to every conference saying deregulation was the only path. JD Vance flew to Paris and told world leaders the future is won "by building, not by hand-wringing about safety." That was the whole pitch. Regulation is for losers. But the same White House just started briefing Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI executives on plans for MANDATORY government review of AI models before public release. The exact policy they destroyed 16 months ago. Fortune called it a "head-spinning policy pirouette." So what happened? ONE AI model happened: In April, Anthropic announced a model called Mythos. During internal testing, it found THOUSANDS of unknown security vulnerabilities across every major operating system and browser on earth including a 27yo bug in OpenBSD, an OS literally famous for being unhackable, and a 16yo flaw in FFmpeg that survived 5 million automated security tests. NOBODY asked it to do any of this. The capabilities emerged on their own as the model got smarter at coding. Anthropic's researchers said they found more bugs in weeks than they'd found in their entire careers combined. The UK's AI Security Institute confirmed Mythos could autonomously execute multi-stage cyberattacks on networks. Tasks that take human professionals DAYS. Anthropic refused to release it. Formed "Project Glasswing" with Apple, Microsoft, Google, JPMorgan, and 40 other organizations to use it defensively before attackers develop similar tools. Their estimate: Competing labs will have comparable capabilities within 6 to 18 months. That timeline is what scared Washington. Because here's what nobody in the White House considered while removing safety rules: What happens when a devastating AI-enabled cyberattack hits American infrastructure and the government has ZERO oversight in place? No safety testing, pre-release review, or reporting. They literally burned all of it. David Sacks quietly left in March. Treasury Secretary Bessent and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles took over AI policy. They're now drafting an executive order for an AI working group that would vet models before release. Some officials want the government to get FIRST ACCESS to new models. The same government that said 16 months ago it had no business being involved. But here's where it gets really insane: The company that triggered all of this was BANNED by the Trump administration from government contracts. Labeled Anthropic a "supply-chain risk." They tried to punish them for refusing to let their AI target US citizens autonomously. Anthropic is currently fighting the Pentagon in federal court. So the timeline reads like this: January 2025: Trump kills Biden's AI oversight. July 2025: Calls AI a "beautiful baby," signs orders to fast-track AI with zero safety guardrails. March 2026: Bans Anthropic from government work. April 2026: Anthropic's Mythos demonstrates it can hack every major OS on earth. May 2026: Same administration rebuilds the oversight it destroyed BECAUSE of the company it banned. This is what happens when ideology meets reality. Every government told itself AI regulation could wait. Mythos proved them wrong overnight. Open-weight models with similar capabilities are even closer. Once those tools are in the wild, no executive order puts them back.

The Trump administration just did a complete 180 on AI regulation. 16 months ago, Trump killed Biden's AI executive order on DAY ONE. Called AI "a beautiful baby" that shouldn't be stopped with rules. His AI czar David Sacks went to every conference saying deregulation was the only path. JD Vance flew to Paris and told world leaders the future is won "by building, not by hand-wringing about safety." That was the whole pitch. Regulation is for losers. But the same White House just started briefing Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI executives on plans for MANDATORY government review of AI models before public release. The exact policy they destroyed 16 months ago. Fortune called it a "head-spinning policy pirouette." So what happened? ONE AI model happened: In April, Anthropic announced a model called Mythos. During internal testing, it found THOUSANDS of unknown security vulnerabilities across every major operating system and browser on earth including a 27yo bug in OpenBSD, an OS literally famous for being unhackable, and a 16yo flaw in FFmpeg that survived 5 million automated security tests. NOBODY asked it to do any of this. The capabilities emerged on their own as the model got smarter at coding. Anthropic's researchers said they found more bugs in weeks than they'd found in their entire careers combined. The UK's AI Security Institute confirmed Mythos could autonomously execute multi-stage cyberattacks on networks. Tasks that take human professionals DAYS. Anthropic refused to release it. Formed "Project Glasswing" with Apple, Microsoft, Google, JPMorgan, and 40 other organizations to use it defensively before attackers develop similar tools. Their estimate: Competing labs will have comparable capabilities within 6 to 18 months. That timeline is what scared Washington. Because here's what nobody in the White House considered while removing safety rules: What happens when a devastating AI-enabled cyberattack hits American infrastructure and the government has ZERO oversight in place? No safety testing, pre-release review, or reporting. They literally burned all of it. David Sacks quietly left in March. Treasury Secretary Bessent and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles took over AI policy. They're now drafting an executive order for an AI working group that would vet models before release. Some officials want the government to get FIRST ACCESS to new models. The same government that said 16 months ago it had no business being involved. But here's where it gets really insane: The company that triggered all of this was BANNED by the Trump administration from government contracts. Labeled Anthropic a "supply-chain risk." They tried to punish them for refusing to let their AI target US citizens autonomously. Anthropic is currently fighting the Pentagon in federal court. So the timeline reads like this: January 2025: Trump kills Biden's AI oversight. July 2025: Calls AI a "beautiful baby," signs orders to fast-track AI with zero safety guardrails. March 2026: Bans Anthropic from government work. April 2026: Anthropic's Mythos demonstrates it can hack every major OS on earth. May 2026: Same administration rebuilds the oversight it destroyed BECAUSE of the company it banned. This is what happens when ideology meets reality. Every government told itself AI regulation could wait. Mythos proved them wrong overnight. Open-weight models with similar capabilities are even closer. Once those tools are in the wild, no executive order puts them back.

Ricardo

75,618 次观看 • 5 个月前

Anthropic is refusing to release its latest model because it’s so powerful that it becomes a security threat. @jason makes the case that the AI race is “existential” to national security because of what models like Anthropic’s withheld model, “Mythos,” can do. If bad actors like China get their hands on these capabilities with no incentive to disclose it, there are some pretty scary implications… The real question… What if they already have it?

Anthropic is refusing to release its latest model because it’s so powerful that it becomes a security threat. @jason makes the case that the AI race is “existential” to national security because of what models like Anthropic’s withheld model, “Mythos,” can do. If bad actors like China get their hands on these capabilities with no incentive to disclose it, there are some pretty scary implications… The real question… What if they already have it?

This Week in Startups

23,084 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨David Ondrej exposes the truth about the frontier labs. “The progress isn’t slowing down for them, it’s slowing down for us the slaves” “If you think Mythos or Fable 5 is the best model Anthropic has you’re delusional” this is the first time ever that the best AI models are not publicly accessible Anthropic has fear mongered every single human and is now playing the victim with OpenAI after getting “banned” by the U.S government. THIS NEEDS TO WAKE YOU UP frontier models moving forward will become more restricted, less accessible, and more expensive and the only way to combat that is with open-source models. Investing into a DGX spark or 5090 Linux for localized intelligence and building your own AI lab is where the future is heading. every single person needs to start contributing to open-source together for the betterment of society.

🚨David Ondrej exposes the truth about the frontier labs. “The progress isn’t slowing down for them, it’s slowing down for us the slaves” “If you think Mythos or Fable 5 is the best model Anthropic has you’re delusional” this is the first time ever that the best AI models are not publicly accessible Anthropic has fear mongered every single human and is now playing the victim with OpenAI after getting “banned” by the U.S government. THIS NEEDS TO WAKE YOU UP frontier models moving forward will become more restricted, less accessible, and more expensive and the only way to combat that is with open-source models. Investing into a DGX spark or 5090 Linux for localized intelligence and building your own AI lab is where the future is heading. every single person needs to start contributing to open-source together for the betterment of society.

Vadim

83,366 次观看 • 3 个月前

Every American needs to start educating their themselves about FLOCK CAMERAS and surveillance technology being used against us by the government. This should be a universal issue that we can come together on to fight against the destruction of our civil liberties.

Every American needs to start educating their themselves about FLOCK CAMERAS and surveillance technology being used against us by the government. This should be a universal issue that we can come together on to fight against the destruction of our civil liberties.

Brandon Straka #WalkAway

85,185 次观看 • 3 个月前