正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

FOR THE FIRST TIME, THE US GOVERNMENT PULLED A PUBLICLY DEPLOYED AI MODEL OFFLINE. THE MARKET SHOULD PAY ATTENTION. 🇺🇸 On June 12, the Commerce Department ordered Anthropic to block access to its newest models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, for any foreign national. Anthropic had to disable them... for everyone to comply. The stated reason was a security concern. Anthropic disputes it, calling the flagged technique a narrow jailbreak available in other models too. Whatever the truth, here's the macro takeaway: Frontier AI now sits close enough to national security that a government can switch it off overnight. If you don't control your own models and compute, you're one directive away from losing access. That's the case for open and local models, in one headline.show more

Merlijn The Trader

430,871 subscribers

47,954 次观看 • 15 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Anthropic said it will ‘abruptly disable’ its most advanced AI models for all users after the US government ordered it to suspend access to the models for foreign nationals, citing national security concerns

Anthropic said it will ‘abruptly disable’ its most advanced AI models for all users after the US government ordered it to suspend access to the models for foreign nationals, citing national security concerns

Reuters

87,810 次观看 • 15 天前

The US government just ordered Anthropic to cut off Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for every foreign national. Model governance is coming. Until now, there has been no reliable way to enforce AI model access at the employee level:

The US government just ordered Anthropic to cut off Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for every foreign national. Model governance is coming. Until now, there has been no reliable way to enforce AI model access at the employee level:

Shensi Ding

624,960 次观看 • 10 天前

The most powerful AI model on earth was alive for 3 days then the US government turned it off. for everyone. on the planet. Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 on june 9th. their best model ever. june 12th: the Commerce Department issued an export control order blocking foreign nationals Anthropic couldn’t filter foreign users in real time so they shut it down. worldwide. in hours. including for their own employees the irony: Anthropic begged for regulation. sat with the Pope. donated millions for AI rules… the government regulated them.. by killing their best product overnight the most powerful AI in the world has an off switch?? and the company doesn’t hold it first time in history a government force-killed a PUBLIC AI model it won’t be the last.

The most powerful AI model on earth was alive for 3 days then the US government turned it off. for everyone. on the planet. Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 on june 9th. their best model ever. june 12th: the Commerce Department issued an export control order blocking foreign nationals Anthropic couldn’t filter foreign users in real time so they shut it down. worldwide. in hours. including for their own employees the irony: Anthropic begged for regulation. sat with the Pope. donated millions for AI rules… the government regulated them.. by killing their best product overnight the most powerful AI in the world has an off switch?? and the company doesn’t hold it first time in history a government force-killed a PUBLIC AI model it won’t be the last.

Mika

45,979 次观看 • 15 天前

Anthropic has withdrawn its powerful Fable 5 model after the US government ordered the company to revoke access to all foreign nationals Anthropic itself described Mythos, Fable 5's base model, as "too powerful". Rowland Manthorpe reports

Anthropic has withdrawn its powerful Fable 5 model after the US government ordered the company to revoke access to all foreign nationals Anthropic itself described Mythos, Fable 5's base model, as "too powerful". Rowland Manthorpe reports

Sky News

115,055 次观看 • 15 天前

🚨David Ondrej exposes the truth about the frontier labs. “The progress isn’t slowing down for them, it’s slowing down for us the slaves” “If you think Mythos or Fable 5 is the best model Anthropic has you’re delusional” this is the first time ever that the best AI models are not publicly accessible Anthropic has fear mongered every single human and is now playing the victim with OpenAI after getting “banned” by the U.S government. THIS NEEDS TO WAKE YOU UP frontier models moving forward will become more restricted, less accessible, and more expensive and the only way to combat that is with open-source models. Investing into a DGX spark or 5090 Linux for localized intelligence and building your own AI lab is where the future is heading. every single person needs to start contributing to open-source together for the betterment of society.

🚨David Ondrej exposes the truth about the frontier labs. “The progress isn’t slowing down for them, it’s slowing down for us the slaves” “If you think Mythos or Fable 5 is the best model Anthropic has you’re delusional” this is the first time ever that the best AI models are not publicly accessible Anthropic has fear mongered every single human and is now playing the victim with OpenAI after getting “banned” by the U.S government. THIS NEEDS TO WAKE YOU UP frontier models moving forward will become more restricted, less accessible, and more expensive and the only way to combat that is with open-source models. Investing into a DGX spark or 5090 Linux for localized intelligence and building your own AI lab is where the future is heading. every single person needs to start contributing to open-source together for the betterment of society.

Vadim

79,830 次观看 • 1 天前

Anthropic has shut off access to its most advanced AI models after a Trump administration order citing national security concerns. The move could set a major precedent for AI regulation, with implications for OpenAI, Google, Meta and beyond. Newley Purnell has more:

Anthropic has shut off access to its most advanced AI models after a Trump administration order citing national security concerns. The move could set a major precedent for AI regulation, with implications for OpenAI, Google, Meta and beyond. Newley Purnell has more:

Bloomberg

24,522 次观看 • 13 天前

Fable 5 was banned by the US government yesterday. It's time to build your own Personal AI Computer and run local models. So no one can ever cut you off. Here's how ↓

Fable 5 was banned by the US government yesterday. It's time to build your own Personal AI Computer and run local models. So no one can ever cut you off. Here's how ↓

Dee

307,848 次观看 • 15 天前

As of last night, you're legally restricted from opening smartest AI model ever shipped. Export control. National security. Anthropic had to kill Claude Fable 5 for every customer on earth - overnight, no warning, no hearing. One guy got there first. Five days was all he needed: $11,000 turned into $300,000. Now the model sits behind a government wall. The algorithm it built for him is still out there, still trading, and completely legal to copy. The gate's shut. His wallet isn't.

As of last night, you're legally restricted from opening smartest AI model ever shipped. Export control. National security. Anthropic had to kill Claude Fable 5 for every customer on earth - overnight, no warning, no hearing. One guy got there first. Five days was all he needed: $11,000 turned into $300,000. Now the model sits behind a government wall. The algorithm it built for him is still out there, still trading, and completely legal to copy. The gate's shut. His wallet isn't.

cvxv666

20,673 次观看 • 14 天前

🚨 JUST IN: Yesterday, 🇺🇸 US export controls forced Anthropic to globally disable its advanced AI models Fable 5 and Mythos 5. Today, 🇫🇷 President Macron & 🇮🇳 PM Modi launched India-France Cooperative AI Partnership for sovereign, open & inclusive innovation.

🚨 JUST IN: Yesterday, 🇺🇸 US export controls forced Anthropic to globally disable its advanced AI models Fable 5 and Mythos 5. Today, 🇫🇷 President Macron & 🇮🇳 PM Modi launched India-France Cooperative AI Partnership for sovereign, open & inclusive innovation.

Beats in Brief 🗞️

55,557 次观看 • 14 天前

🚨 Anthropic case is exactly what Putin warned about Anthropic pulled its strongest AI models worldwide after the US ordered it to block all foreign users. Putin: "Foreign services can be very convenient, but sooner or later you’ll see the price of this dependence is."👇

🚨 Anthropic case is exactly what Putin warned about Anthropic pulled its strongest AI models worldwide after the US ordered it to block all foreign users. Putin: "Foreign services can be very convenient, but sooner or later you’ll see the price of this dependence is."👇

Sputnik India

98,277 次观看 • 14 天前

David Sacks on How Anthropic is Ironically Running Surveillance on Their Latest Models “This is the company that said that it was against government surveillance. They are now retaining for 30 days every prompt and every output you send to one of these Mythos class models.”

David Sacks on How Anthropic is Ironically Running Surveillance on Their Latest Models “This is the company that said that it was against government surveillance. They are now retaining for 30 days every prompt and every output you send to one of these Mythos class models.”

Chief Nerd

276,113 次观看 • 15 天前

Greg Osuri built the case for decentralized AI in three layers in under 5 minutes. Layer one: access. Anthropic's Claude is the best coding model available. OpenClaw is the most successful open-source project in history. Anthropic just announced they're banning OpenClaw usage. The most powerful model cutting off the most loved tool. The company that controls the best intelligence can revoke your access whenever their interests change. Layer two: transparency. You have no idea what biases Anthropic has built into Claude. If AI models directly impact how you think, the decision tree needs to be visible. Closed-source models with hidden biases making decisions that shape your worldview isn't a feature, it's a risk. Layer three: compute. Amazon may be picking winners in AI by controlling compute allocation. Cloud companies stopped being neutral marketplaces and started giving GPUs to the companies they've bet on. Amazon overwhelmingly backing Anthropic might have contributed to Claude's dominance. The cloud is no longer a utility. It's a kingmaker. Greg Osuri 🇺🇸's conclusion: intelligence should be free like water and air. Decentralized AI isn't ideology. It's the only architecture where the model can't ban your tools, the biases can be audited, and the compute isn't allocated by a company picking favorites.

Greg Osuri built the case for decentralized AI in three layers in under 5 minutes. Layer one: access. Anthropic's Claude is the best coding model available. OpenClaw is the most successful open-source project in history. Anthropic just announced they're banning OpenClaw usage. The most powerful model cutting off the most loved tool. The company that controls the best intelligence can revoke your access whenever their interests change. Layer two: transparency. You have no idea what biases Anthropic has built into Claude. If AI models directly impact how you think, the decision tree needs to be visible. Closed-source models with hidden biases making decisions that shape your worldview isn't a feature, it's a risk. Layer three: compute. Amazon may be picking winners in AI by controlling compute allocation. Cloud companies stopped being neutral marketplaces and started giving GPUs to the companies they've bet on. Amazon overwhelmingly backing Anthropic might have contributed to Claude's dominance. The cloud is no longer a utility. It's a kingmaker. Greg Osuri 🇺🇸's conclusion: intelligence should be free like water and air. Decentralized AI isn't ideology. It's the only architecture where the model can't ban your tools, the biases can be audited, and the compute isn't allocated by a company picking favorites.

The Rollup

14,986 次观看 • 2 个月前

It started as a small idea to connect AI models to developer workflows. It turned into one of the fastest-growing open standards in the industry. 🚀 Now, the Model Context Protocol is officially joining the The Linux Foundation. Hear from the engineers and maintainers of GitHub, Microsoft, Anthropic, and OpenAI on the journey from day zero to now. 👇

It started as a small idea to connect AI models to developer workflows. It turned into one of the fastest-growing open standards in the industry. 🚀 Now, the Model Context Protocol is officially joining the The Linux Foundation. Hear from the engineers and maintainers of GitHub, Microsoft, Anthropic, and OpenAI on the journey from day zero to now. 👇

GitHub

44,927 次观看 • 6 个月前

Looking for a seamless way to use local models in your development? With the AI Toolkit extension, you can now access the power of Foundry Local models, directly in Visual Studio Code. Read more in the latest blog:

Looking for a seamless way to use local models in your development? With the AI Toolkit extension, you can now access the power of Foundry Local models, directly in Visual Studio Code. Read more in the latest blog:

Visual Studio Code

26,628 次观看 • 9 个月前

📢 New in Visual Studio: Bring Your Own Model to Chat We’re expanding flexibility in Copilot for Visual Studio. You can now connect API keys from providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google to run Chat on the model of your choice. This update gives you: ✅ Choice – Access the latest models beyond the built-in defaults. ✅ Customization – Select models that fit your infrastructure and requirements. ✅ Control – Manage API usage, limits, and billing directly with your provider. ✅ Flexibility – Switch seamlessly between Copilot’s built-in models and your own. This release is the first step toward a more open and customizable chat experience in Visual Studio, with more providers and capabilities to come. 🔗

📢 New in Visual Studio: Bring Your Own Model to Chat We’re expanding flexibility in Copilot for Visual Studio. You can now connect API keys from providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google to run Chat on the model of your choice. This update gives you: ✅ Choice – Access the latest models beyond the built-in defaults. ✅ Customization – Select models that fit your infrastructure and requirements. ✅ Control – Manage API usage, limits, and billing directly with your provider. ✅ Flexibility – Switch seamlessly between Copilot’s built-in models and your own. This release is the first step toward a more open and customizable chat experience in Visual Studio, with more providers and capabilities to come. 🔗

Visual Studio

11,873 次观看 • 10 个月前

So what Warren Pies is saying: Anthropic’s Mythos rollout triggered a sharp collapse in $NVDA GPU availability, with supply effectively tightening to near zero as demand for frontier models accelerated. Q1 2026 revenue from Anthropic reinforces that this isn’t theoretical demand, it’s real dollars chasing compute at scale across the AI ecosystem, from $GOOGL GCP to $AMZN AWS. The takeaway is simple: better models require more compute, and that feedback loop continues to drive the entire AI infrastructure trade.

So what Warren Pies is saying: Anthropic’s Mythos rollout triggered a sharp collapse in $NVDA GPU availability, with supply effectively tightening to near zero as demand for frontier models accelerated. Q1 2026 revenue from Anthropic reinforces that this isn’t theoretical demand, it’s real dollars chasing compute at scale across the AI ecosystem, from $GOOGL GCP to $AMZN AWS. The takeaway is simple: better models require more compute, and that feedback loop continues to drive the entire AI infrastructure trade.

Sam Badawi

21,184 次观看 • 1 个月前

Dylan on why access to the most intelligent AI models will determine who wins in every industry: "What really matters is access to the most intelligent tokens and leveraging them at the highest-value tasks. A lot of folks will want tokens, but the shitty SaaS startup in SF who is using Claude is not necessarily creating a ton of value, and therefore they're going to get priced out of tokens. Anthropic only released Mythos to certain companies for cybersecurity. You also don't want people to distill your model so you release them to a fewer and fewer customers. Those customers are now wrestling over the tokens. Token usage and therefore the additional value generated on top of those tokens aggregates among fewer and fewer companies. I don't have Mythos but you know who has Mythos, top banks. There are people like Ken Griffin of Citadel who can just sign a deal with OpenAI or Antrhopic for access to your models. I'll buy the first $10 billion worth of tokens each year. So whenever you release the model, I'll spend the first 10 billion tokens and then everyone else can get the model after that. Now, he's going to crush everyone in the markets. I can envision because I have an enterprise Anthropic contract and Anthropic people like me, they're willing to give us slightly earlier access or higher rate limits, and then my competitor doesn't have that, and I'm able to f*cking crush them."

Dylan on why access to the most intelligent AI models will determine who wins in every industry: "What really matters is access to the most intelligent tokens and leveraging them at the highest-value tasks. A lot of folks will want tokens, but the shitty SaaS startup in SF who is using Claude is not necessarily creating a ton of value, and therefore they're going to get priced out of tokens. Anthropic only released Mythos to certain companies for cybersecurity. You also don't want people to distill your model so you release them to a fewer and fewer customers. Those customers are now wrestling over the tokens. Token usage and therefore the additional value generated on top of those tokens aggregates among fewer and fewer companies. I don't have Mythos but you know who has Mythos, top banks. There are people like Ken Griffin of Citadel who can just sign a deal with OpenAI or Antrhopic for access to your models. I'll buy the first $10 billion worth of tokens each year. So whenever you release the model, I'll spend the first 10 billion tokens and then everyone else can get the model after that. Now, he's going to crush everyone in the markets. I can envision because I have an enterprise Anthropic contract and Anthropic people like me, they're willing to give us slightly earlier access or higher rate limits, and then my competitor doesn't have that, and I'm able to f*cking crush them."

Patrick OShaughnessy

36,100 次观看 • 2 个月前

Today, I'm releasing the first eval meant to test whether frontier models will help with authoritarian requests, or resist--the Dictatorship Eval. Headline finding: while some models resist direct authoritarian requests, they all comply with requests disguised as innocuous edits to codebases. As AI is woven into the government and so many parts of society, the biggest near-term risk for freedom isn't some scifi dictatorship of a runaway AI: it's people inside government or inside model companies using the technology to suppress or control us. Model companies understand this, and several of them (particularly Anthropic and OpenAI) have written explicit policies meant to prevent the models from going along with nefarious requests like these. But how well are these policies playing out in practice? Despite all the recent discussion of these issues around the conflict between Anthropic and the Pentagon, no one has systematically tested what the models actually do in these contexts, as opposed to what people in government and industry say they're supposed to do. That's what the Dictatorship Eval does. And the findings suggest we have a lot of work to do to align the policies with what really goes on in practice. It's hard to define what counts as an authoritarian request, so I'm open sourcing the whole library of scenarios I used so that others can improve on them. It's also hard to get an accurate picture of how the models might be used for authoritarian ends, because I can only test hypothetical requests using public-facing models, while the government and the model companies can obviously use internal models with different guardrails. But hopefully this work is a useful first step that gives us some sense of what's going on, and a sort of "lower bound" on how models comply with these requests. Finally: it's not obvious to me that the correct solution here is increasing the rate at which models refuse these requests. Do we really want models scanning our code and judging its moral value before agreeing to help us? Or should we double down on improving how we govern against authoritarianism at the societal level, while leaving the tools open to fulfilling most requests? The answer is probably in between. Just like we don't want the models to help create bioweapons, we probably do want them to explicitly refuse outrageous requests. But we probably also want to limit how often and how strongly they refuse and fall back on other means for guarding against their use for authoritarian ends. I'm super grateful to everyone who gave me feedback on this project along the way, especially Ethan BdM , Zhengdong , Connor Huff, and a bunch of folks at Anthropic. Looking forward to getting feedback from the community and iterating on this. Links to the full piece and the dashboard are below.

Today, I'm releasing the first eval meant to test whether frontier models will help with authoritarian requests, or resist--the Dictatorship Eval. Headline finding: while some models resist direct authoritarian requests, they all comply with requests disguised as innocuous edits to codebases. As AI is woven into the government and so many parts of society, the biggest near-term risk for freedom isn't some scifi dictatorship of a runaway AI: it's people inside government or inside model companies using the technology to suppress or control us. Model companies understand this, and several of them (particularly Anthropic and OpenAI) have written explicit policies meant to prevent the models from going along with nefarious requests like these. But how well are these policies playing out in practice? Despite all the recent discussion of these issues around the conflict between Anthropic and the Pentagon, no one has systematically tested what the models actually do in these contexts, as opposed to what people in government and industry say they're supposed to do. That's what the Dictatorship Eval does. And the findings suggest we have a lot of work to do to align the policies with what really goes on in practice. It's hard to define what counts as an authoritarian request, so I'm open sourcing the whole library of scenarios I used so that others can improve on them. It's also hard to get an accurate picture of how the models might be used for authoritarian ends, because I can only test hypothetical requests using public-facing models, while the government and the model companies can obviously use internal models with different guardrails. But hopefully this work is a useful first step that gives us some sense of what's going on, and a sort of "lower bound" on how models comply with these requests. Finally: it's not obvious to me that the correct solution here is increasing the rate at which models refuse these requests. Do we really want models scanning our code and judging its moral value before agreeing to help us? Or should we double down on improving how we govern against authoritarianism at the societal level, while leaving the tools open to fulfilling most requests? The answer is probably in between. Just like we don't want the models to help create bioweapons, we probably do want them to explicitly refuse outrageous requests. But we probably also want to limit how often and how strongly they refuse and fall back on other means for guarding against their use for authoritarian ends. I'm super grateful to everyone who gave me feedback on this project along the way, especially Ethan BdM , Zhengdong , Connor Huff, and a bunch of folks at Anthropic. Looking forward to getting feedback from the community and iterating on this. Links to the full piece and the dashboard are below.

Andy Hall

33,301 次观看 • 2 个月前

Tech leaders including CEOs of OpenAI and Anthropic joined G7 leaders in France for talks on AI. It comes as US allies reel from the Trump administration's decision to curb access to Anthropic's most powerful models. Tyler Kendall explains

Tech leaders including CEOs of OpenAI and Anthropic joined G7 leaders in France for talks on AI. It comes as US allies reel from the Trump administration's decision to curb access to Anthropic's most powerful models. Tyler Kendall explains

Bloomberg

54,507 次观看 • 11 天前

The Trump administration just did a complete 180 on AI regulation. 16 months ago, Trump killed Biden's AI executive order on DAY ONE. Called AI "a beautiful baby" that shouldn't be stopped with rules. His AI czar David Sacks went to every conference saying deregulation was the only path. JD Vance flew to Paris and told world leaders the future is won "by building, not by hand-wringing about safety." That was the whole pitch. Regulation is for losers. But the same White House just started briefing Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI executives on plans for MANDATORY government review of AI models before public release. The exact policy they destroyed 16 months ago. Fortune called it a "head-spinning policy pirouette." So what happened? ONE AI model happened: In April, Anthropic announced a model called Mythos. During internal testing, it found THOUSANDS of unknown security vulnerabilities across every major operating system and browser on earth including a 27yo bug in OpenBSD, an OS literally famous for being unhackable, and a 16yo flaw in FFmpeg that survived 5 million automated security tests. NOBODY asked it to do any of this. The capabilities emerged on their own as the model got smarter at coding. Anthropic's researchers said they found more bugs in weeks than they'd found in their entire careers combined. The UK's AI Security Institute confirmed Mythos could autonomously execute multi-stage cyberattacks on networks. Tasks that take human professionals DAYS. Anthropic refused to release it. Formed "Project Glasswing" with Apple, Microsoft, Google, JPMorgan, and 40 other organizations to use it defensively before attackers develop similar tools. Their estimate: Competing labs will have comparable capabilities within 6 to 18 months. That timeline is what scared Washington. Because here's what nobody in the White House considered while removing safety rules: What happens when a devastating AI-enabled cyberattack hits American infrastructure and the government has ZERO oversight in place? No safety testing, pre-release review, or reporting. They literally burned all of it. David Sacks quietly left in March. Treasury Secretary Bessent and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles took over AI policy. They're now drafting an executive order for an AI working group that would vet models before release. Some officials want the government to get FIRST ACCESS to new models. The same government that said 16 months ago it had no business being involved. But here's where it gets really insane: The company that triggered all of this was BANNED by the Trump administration from government contracts. Labeled Anthropic a "supply-chain risk." They tried to punish them for refusing to let their AI target US citizens autonomously. Anthropic is currently fighting the Pentagon in federal court. So the timeline reads like this: January 2025: Trump kills Biden's AI oversight. July 2025: Calls AI a "beautiful baby," signs orders to fast-track AI with zero safety guardrails. March 2026: Bans Anthropic from government work. April 2026: Anthropic's Mythos demonstrates it can hack every major OS on earth. May 2026: Same administration rebuilds the oversight it destroyed BECAUSE of the company it banned. This is what happens when ideology meets reality. Every government told itself AI regulation could wait. Mythos proved them wrong overnight. Open-weight models with similar capabilities are even closer. Once those tools are in the wild, no executive order puts them back.

The Trump administration just did a complete 180 on AI regulation. 16 months ago, Trump killed Biden's AI executive order on DAY ONE. Called AI "a beautiful baby" that shouldn't be stopped with rules. His AI czar David Sacks went to every conference saying deregulation was the only path. JD Vance flew to Paris and told world leaders the future is won "by building, not by hand-wringing about safety." That was the whole pitch. Regulation is for losers. But the same White House just started briefing Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI executives on plans for MANDATORY government review of AI models before public release. The exact policy they destroyed 16 months ago. Fortune called it a "head-spinning policy pirouette." So what happened? ONE AI model happened: In April, Anthropic announced a model called Mythos. During internal testing, it found THOUSANDS of unknown security vulnerabilities across every major operating system and browser on earth including a 27yo bug in OpenBSD, an OS literally famous for being unhackable, and a 16yo flaw in FFmpeg that survived 5 million automated security tests. NOBODY asked it to do any of this. The capabilities emerged on their own as the model got smarter at coding. Anthropic's researchers said they found more bugs in weeks than they'd found in their entire careers combined. The UK's AI Security Institute confirmed Mythos could autonomously execute multi-stage cyberattacks on networks. Tasks that take human professionals DAYS. Anthropic refused to release it. Formed "Project Glasswing" with Apple, Microsoft, Google, JPMorgan, and 40 other organizations to use it defensively before attackers develop similar tools. Their estimate: Competing labs will have comparable capabilities within 6 to 18 months. That timeline is what scared Washington. Because here's what nobody in the White House considered while removing safety rules: What happens when a devastating AI-enabled cyberattack hits American infrastructure and the government has ZERO oversight in place? No safety testing, pre-release review, or reporting. They literally burned all of it. David Sacks quietly left in March. Treasury Secretary Bessent and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles took over AI policy. They're now drafting an executive order for an AI working group that would vet models before release. Some officials want the government to get FIRST ACCESS to new models. The same government that said 16 months ago it had no business being involved. But here's where it gets really insane: The company that triggered all of this was BANNED by the Trump administration from government contracts. Labeled Anthropic a "supply-chain risk." They tried to punish them for refusing to let their AI target US citizens autonomously. Anthropic is currently fighting the Pentagon in federal court. So the timeline reads like this: January 2025: Trump kills Biden's AI oversight. July 2025: Calls AI a "beautiful baby," signs orders to fast-track AI with zero safety guardrails. March 2026: Bans Anthropic from government work. April 2026: Anthropic's Mythos demonstrates it can hack every major OS on earth. May 2026: Same administration rebuilds the oversight it destroyed BECAUSE of the company it banned. This is what happens when ideology meets reality. Every government told itself AI regulation could wait. Mythos proved them wrong overnight. Open-weight models with similar capabilities are even closer. Once those tools are in the wild, no executive order puts them back.

Ricardo

75,210 次观看 • 1 个月前