Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

David Sacks: Silicon Valley Was Built On Permissionless Innovation “ The thing that really makes Silicon Valley special is this concept of permissionless innovation.” “Since Hewlett and Packard 85 years ago started building Silicon Valley, the idea has always been that just a couple of founders can have a...

theallinpod's profile picture

The All-In Podcast

557,000 subscribers

85,817 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Sequoia’s Shaun Maguire says Silicon Valley is undergoing a "Copernican" shift and waking up to the fact that it revolves around a set of much larger industries, not the other way around: "In Silicon Valley, [there's] almost this Copernican principle — where people used to believe that the world revolved around the Earth, then realized that it revolves around the sun." "There's a Silicon Valley parallel where people think that all of technology, all of industry, revolves around Silicon Valley, but it's actually kind of the opposite." "Silicon Valley is Earth, and there are these much bigger forces and bodies, which include energy, the chemical industry, these giant supply chains, and the semiconductor industry, which has been around for a very long time. It was pretty advanced, and people in Silicon Valley forgot about it." "I don't like the language of other industries pivoting into AI. I actually think it's the opposite." "I think it's like Silicon Valley is waking up from its toddlerhood and realizing that there were these giant industries that we underestimated, and they're actually really freaking good at what they do. And we can all benefit by working together."
2:17

Sequoia’s Shaun Maguire says Silicon Valley is undergoing a "Copernican" shift and waking up to the fact that it revolves around a set of much larger industries, not the other way around: "In Silicon Valley, [there's] almost this Copernican principle — where people used to believe that the world revolved around the Earth, then realized that it revolves around the sun." "There's a Silicon Valley parallel where people think that all of technology, all of industry, revolves around Silicon Valley, but it's actually kind of the opposite." "Silicon Valley is Earth, and there are these much bigger forces and bodies, which include energy, the chemical industry, these giant supply chains, and the semiconductor industry, which has been around for a very long time. It was pretty advanced, and people in Silicon Valley forgot about it." "I don't like the language of other industries pivoting into AI. I actually think it's the opposite." "I think it's like Silicon Valley is waking up from its toddlerhood and realizing that there were these giant industries that we underestimated, and they're actually really freaking good at what they do. And we can all benefit by working together."

TBPN

238,386 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Palantir cofounders Alex Karp AND Joe Lonsdale break down why average Americans hate Silicon Valley in the immediate aftermath of the SVB collapse: Lonsdale: “I remember being on the phone with Alex and a prominent VC 18 years ago. The guy was laughing saying we weren't a serious company because Alex didn't have a technical degree.” “Alex now has $1.5B in treasuries and no exposure to any of the banks in Silicon Valley. So, he showed that guy.” “That guy wanted us to do social media at the time. He said, ‘Why are you working in defense?’” Karp: “We lead the world in tech. We need the innovation, and Silicon Valley institutions are crucial.” “There is another issue— why is Silicon Valley unpopular? Leaving aside things that Joe’s invested in and cofounding Palantir, a lot of what Silicon Valley has done is not something that anyone wants to support.” “It's building these large industries where only a small group of people get wealthy and everyone else feels like, ‘Well, what did I get from it?’” “Why is Silicon Valley so unpopular? Because there are so few companies that choose America and its allies over our adversaries. That build things that actually have an impact on humans in America.” Lonsdale: “I work on a lot of healthcare companies and companies in biotech that have saved hundreds of lives and will save thousands of lives.” “Are there ridiculous things in tech? Were there monkey JPEGs? Yes. There's all sorts of ridiculous things. I think right now there's a lot of hate coming from people who think in terms of bumper stickers on the left and the right, tolling unwarranted.” Karp: “The thing that scares our adversaries the most— more than anything else— is the innovation in our American tech scene.” “Silicon Valley would do well to understand— we’re the bedrock of innovation in the world— why do most Americans not like us? Asking that simple but legitimate question is super important for our country.” “Silicon Valley once built things for the military and then exported it to everyday Americans. And all over the world. And de facto, that's what we've done.” Lonsdale: “There was definitely a bubble in tech.” “There were a lot of silly things going on that weren't focusing on the stuff that mattered, that Alex is talking about.” “You know, if Alex hadn't done what he'd done, he prevented tens of attacks on American soil. He saved the government billions of dollars.” Karp: “By the way— Joe is an incredible co-founder and a really courageous person.” Via FOX Business’ Liz Claman in March 2023.
5:06

Palantir cofounders Alex Karp AND Joe Lonsdale break down why average Americans hate Silicon Valley in the immediate aftermath of the SVB collapse: Lonsdale: “I remember being on the phone with Alex and a prominent VC 18 years ago. The guy was laughing saying we weren't a serious company because Alex didn't have a technical degree.” “Alex now has $1.5B in treasuries and no exposure to any of the banks in Silicon Valley. So, he showed that guy.” “That guy wanted us to do social media at the time. He said, ‘Why are you working in defense?’” Karp: “We lead the world in tech. We need the innovation, and Silicon Valley institutions are crucial.” “There is another issue— why is Silicon Valley unpopular? Leaving aside things that Joe’s invested in and cofounding Palantir, a lot of what Silicon Valley has done is not something that anyone wants to support.” “It's building these large industries where only a small group of people get wealthy and everyone else feels like, ‘Well, what did I get from it?’” “Why is Silicon Valley so unpopular? Because there are so few companies that choose America and its allies over our adversaries. That build things that actually have an impact on humans in America.” Lonsdale: “I work on a lot of healthcare companies and companies in biotech that have saved hundreds of lives and will save thousands of lives.” “Are there ridiculous things in tech? Were there monkey JPEGs? Yes. There's all sorts of ridiculous things. I think right now there's a lot of hate coming from people who think in terms of bumper stickers on the left and the right, tolling unwarranted.” Karp: “The thing that scares our adversaries the most— more than anything else— is the innovation in our American tech scene.” “Silicon Valley would do well to understand— we’re the bedrock of innovation in the world— why do most Americans not like us? Asking that simple but legitimate question is super important for our country.” “Silicon Valley once built things for the military and then exported it to everyday Americans. And all over the world. And de facto, that's what we've done.” Lonsdale: “There was definitely a bubble in tech.” “There were a lot of silly things going on that weren't focusing on the stuff that mattered, that Alex is talking about.” “You know, if Alex hadn't done what he'd done, he prevented tens of attacks on American soil. He saved the government billions of dollars.” Karp: “By the way— Joe is an incredible co-founder and a really courageous person.” Via FOX Business’ Liz Claman in March 2023.

Jawwwn

48,831 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

General Catalyst CEO Hemant Taneja: Silicon Valley glorifies the wrong values. "Kindness and ambition are not at odds with each other." "In Silicon Valley, we glorify the 'asshole symptom' of founders thinking it's almost a necessary ingredient to succeed." "I don't think it has to be that way."
0:26

General Catalyst CEO Hemant Taneja: Silicon Valley glorifies the wrong values. "Kindness and ambition are not at odds with each other." "In Silicon Valley, we glorify the 'asshole symptom' of founders thinking it's almost a necessary ingredient to succeed." "I don't think it has to be that way."

sourcery

1,118,781 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Ben Horowitz says Silicon Valley can’t be recreated anywhere else in the world because of America's unique culture: "I go all over the world, and everybody wants Silicon Valley, like — how can we have Silicon Valley in the UK? How can we have it in France?" "They have a lot of the ingredients. They have great talent. They’ve got great universities." "But there’s a cultural challenge where — succeeding, doing something larger than yourself, making the world a better place — those aren’t things that young people feel like society values." "So the likelihood, if you’re building a company, of getting people to work for you and dedicate their life to a mission, that is just not that great. Whereas in the US, it’s amazing." Source: benahorowitz.eth on Invest Like the Best with Patrick OShaughnessy
1:08

Ben Horowitz says Silicon Valley can’t be recreated anywhere else in the world because of America's unique culture: "I go all over the world, and everybody wants Silicon Valley, like — how can we have Silicon Valley in the UK? How can we have it in France?" "They have a lot of the ingredients. They have great talent. They’ve got great universities." "But there’s a cultural challenge where — succeeding, doing something larger than yourself, making the world a better place — those aren’t things that young people feel like society values." "So the likelihood, if you’re building a company, of getting people to work for you and dedicate their life to a mission, that is just not that great. Whereas in the US, it’s amazing." Source: benahorowitz.eth on Invest Like the Best with Patrick OShaughnessy

a16z

111,168 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I asked Cameron McCord what silicon valley can learn from the Navy. His answer: Building a culture of deep retrospections on things that go wrong. On the submarine, when something went wrong, they ran "critiques" - the five whys, all the way to root cause. "Silicon Valley has traditionally been bad at that because it's just moving so fast... There's this idea that we don't have time to fully unpack that, or we can take a surface level answer for what happened because we'll just build it again, let's move..."
1:59

I asked Cameron McCord what silicon valley can learn from the Navy. His answer: Building a culture of deep retrospections on things that go wrong. On the submarine, when something went wrong, they ran "critiques" - the five whys, all the way to root cause. "Silicon Valley has traditionally been bad at that because it's just moving so fast... There's this idea that we don't have time to fully unpack that, or we can take a surface level answer for what happened because we'll just build it again, let's move..."

Nakul Mandan

257,872 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

a16z's benahorowitz.eth says the California wealth tax is the "best strategy" to dismantle Silicon Valley that he's ever seen. "It's been so hard to break the Silicon Valley network effect, but this is the best strategy I've seen." "Norway has an unrealized capital gains tax. Norway's got a lot of extremely smart people, great entrepreneurs, but they all left." "When you talk to entrepreneurs in Norway, they're like, 'I literally can't pay the tax because the company got marked up, and I own a lot of it, and I can't get that money out.'" "'It's a private company. I'm stuck. So, I have to leave the country.'" "There are basically no tech entrepreneurs in Norway now."
2:33

a16z's benahorowitz.eth says the California wealth tax is the "best strategy" to dismantle Silicon Valley that he's ever seen. "It's been so hard to break the Silicon Valley network effect, but this is the best strategy I've seen." "Norway has an unrealized capital gains tax. Norway's got a lot of extremely smart people, great entrepreneurs, but they all left." "When you talk to entrepreneurs in Norway, they're like, 'I literally can't pay the tax because the company got marked up, and I own a lot of it, and I can't get that money out.'" "'It's a private company. I'm stuck. So, I have to leave the country.'" "There are basically no tech entrepreneurs in Norway now."

TBPN

649,665 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce
2:15

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

Ron Pragides 

231,781 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

.David Sacks: Trump’s AI Policies Could Fuel U.S. Economic Growth to 4%-5% "What you're seeing is that the adoption of AI applications is the fastest adoption curve we've ever seen. I think it's bigger than the iPhone, bigger than the internet itself, potentially. This technology is being adopted very, very fast by consumers and businesses, and I think it's going to fuel the growth of the American economy for years to come. I think we can get back to those 4 to 5% growth rates with AI as a tailwind. Again, it's facilitating major investment, major innovation, and I think President Trump has already helped facilitate this. He rescinded that 100-page Biden executive order on AI, which burdened AI companies with unnecessary regulation. We rescinded that 200-page rule that burdened semiconductor companies and data center companies with unnecessary regulation. President Trump is leading and he's driving the growth and the innovation, and it's a very different approach than we saw with the Biden administration. The Biden administration really was motivated and proceeded from a position of fear. It was, 'How can the government restrict this? This thing is so risky that we need to control it.' Whereas, I think the Trump administration is proceeding from a position of opportunity, which is, 'How do we take advantage of this technology? How do we drive the growth? How do we drive the investment?' Thanks to President Trump, you are seeing this boom, this novelty that started, and I think it will be one of the most important parts of his legacy."
1:32

.David Sacks: Trump’s AI Policies Could Fuel U.S. Economic Growth to 4%-5% "What you're seeing is that the adoption of AI applications is the fastest adoption curve we've ever seen. I think it's bigger than the iPhone, bigger than the internet itself, potentially. This technology is being adopted very, very fast by consumers and businesses, and I think it's going to fuel the growth of the American economy for years to come. I think we can get back to those 4 to 5% growth rates with AI as a tailwind. Again, it's facilitating major investment, major innovation, and I think President Trump has already helped facilitate this. He rescinded that 100-page Biden executive order on AI, which burdened AI companies with unnecessary regulation. We rescinded that 200-page rule that burdened semiconductor companies and data center companies with unnecessary regulation. President Trump is leading and he's driving the growth and the innovation, and it's a very different approach than we saw with the Biden administration. The Biden administration really was motivated and proceeded from a position of fear. It was, 'How can the government restrict this? This thing is so risky that we need to control it.' Whereas, I think the Trump administration is proceeding from a position of opportunity, which is, 'How do we take advantage of this technology? How do we drive the growth? How do we drive the investment?' Thanks to President Trump, you are seeing this boom, this novelty that started, and I think it will be one of the most important parts of his legacy."

Josh Caplan

126,513 просмотров • 1 год назад

Brad Gerstner: “AI is becoming deeply unpopular in America” “Silicon Valley is losing the battle around AI.” “Doomers are now scaring people about jobs. They think all these job cuts that are going on in America are the result of AI.” “And number two, they're seeing their electric bills go up and they think that's also the result of AI.” “I've talked with a lot of Republican Senators and House members who say they are afraid to mention the words AI because their popularity ratings go down.” “We need to get on the other side of that, because that is a losing proposition for America.” “I think both of those are false narratives, but we need to get on the other side.” “In China, they're not gonna slow down.” “So if we do an own goal here and slow down because we think somehow that this is the path to greater economic growth, it's gonna be a real problem, both national security as well as economic security.”
1:01

Brad Gerstner: “AI is becoming deeply unpopular in America” “Silicon Valley is losing the battle around AI.” “Doomers are now scaring people about jobs. They think all these job cuts that are going on in America are the result of AI.” “And number two, they're seeing their electric bills go up and they think that's also the result of AI.” “I've talked with a lot of Republican Senators and House members who say they are afraid to mention the words AI because their popularity ratings go down.” “We need to get on the other side of that, because that is a losing proposition for America.” “I think both of those are false narratives, but we need to get on the other side.” “In China, they're not gonna slow down.” “So if we do an own goal here and slow down because we think somehow that this is the path to greater economic growth, it's gonna be a real problem, both national security as well as economic security.”

The All-In Podcast

2,073,840 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Ben Horowitz says Silicon Valley is hard to recreate because it requires talent, policy, and culture: "The first is you do need the talent... is there a great technical university that graduates people who know how to build things?" "Many countries have that, that don't have a Silicon Valley. And what are they missing? They're missing the other two components." "The second is, do you have a set of laws and policies that facilitate entrepreneurship, are essentially good for business?" "The third one... is the culture such that young people, the most capable young people willing to make the biggest contribution, do they get status, social status reward?" "That's the thing that's so hard to replicate, and it's so hard to build, and it's so easy to destroy." benahorowitz.eth
4:00

Ben Horowitz says Silicon Valley is hard to recreate because it requires talent, policy, and culture: "The first is you do need the talent... is there a great technical university that graduates people who know how to build things?" "Many countries have that, that don't have a Silicon Valley. And what are they missing? They're missing the other two components." "The second is, do you have a set of laws and policies that facilitate entrepreneurship, are essentially good for business?" "The third one... is the culture such that young people, the most capable young people willing to make the biggest contribution, do they get status, social status reward?" "That's the thing that's so hard to replicate, and it's so hard to build, and it's so easy to destroy." benahorowitz.eth

a16z

69,146 просмотров • 14 дней назад

THE MOST IMPORTANT Q&A OF MEDIA DAY. Mariana: You came from a very solid weekend on top of everything, but at the same time, it seems that you don't feel that the team is listening to you. Am I right? And how do you balance that? Lewis: I feel like we're going in the right direction. Rome wasn't built in one day, so it takes time to build. For me, coming into the team, I wanted to be respectful of the way they've done things in the past and just to really observe and see where our strengths and where our weaknesses are and to highlight where our weaknesses are and areas that we need to work on. But I do feel that they've been responding. I think you're starting to see, hopefully, some of the impact of the work that we're doing in the background and also into next year's car. This is a car that I've had nothing to do with in terms of developing this car over the years. Hopefully, from next year, my input goes into that car, and that will be a car that I've hopefully been a part of or will have been a part of developing. But I think we've got a really great rapport. I think we're really progressing, particularly since the summer break. I think things have started to get better, and it's all just about building trust and communication. Also, I'm coming into a team that English is not the first language, and I don't speak Italian, so it's finding a common ground. And the fact is we all want to win. We're all here to achieve the same thing, and we've got to just keep pushing. So that's why I'm trying to keep everyone motivated on difficult weekends, trying to keep everyone lifted up. But there have been many, many things we've changed this year that I suggested that they hadn't done in the past, and so they have been listening. It doesn't change straight away, just like that. It takes time to build. And as engineers, they really need proof. They need numbers. That's what they work on. So you have to sometimes push to get certain changes to be made, and then when you change it and then it works, you're like, okay. Mariana: That's what I was talking about.. Lewis: Yeah! - F1 2025 Mexico -
2:28

THE MOST IMPORTANT Q&A OF MEDIA DAY. Mariana: You came from a very solid weekend on top of everything, but at the same time, it seems that you don't feel that the team is listening to you. Am I right? And how do you balance that? Lewis: I feel like we're going in the right direction. Rome wasn't built in one day, so it takes time to build. For me, coming into the team, I wanted to be respectful of the way they've done things in the past and just to really observe and see where our strengths and where our weaknesses are and to highlight where our weaknesses are and areas that we need to work on. But I do feel that they've been responding. I think you're starting to see, hopefully, some of the impact of the work that we're doing in the background and also into next year's car. This is a car that I've had nothing to do with in terms of developing this car over the years. Hopefully, from next year, my input goes into that car, and that will be a car that I've hopefully been a part of or will have been a part of developing. But I think we've got a really great rapport. I think we're really progressing, particularly since the summer break. I think things have started to get better, and it's all just about building trust and communication. Also, I'm coming into a team that English is not the first language, and I don't speak Italian, so it's finding a common ground. And the fact is we all want to win. We're all here to achieve the same thing, and we've got to just keep pushing. So that's why I'm trying to keep everyone motivated on difficult weekends, trying to keep everyone lifted up. But there have been many, many things we've changed this year that I suggested that they hadn't done in the past, and so they have been listening. It doesn't change straight away, just like that. It takes time to build. And as engineers, they really need proof. They need numbers. That's what they work on. So you have to sometimes push to get certain changes to be made, and then when you change it and then it works, you're like, okay. Mariana: That's what I was talking about.. Lewis: Yeah! - F1 2025 Mexico -

sim

170,303 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"They're like: this is inevitable. There's nothing you can do about it. And so all that's left for us to do is to make sure that we are part of the winners, not the losers." Aaron Bastani in conversation with AI journalist Karen Hao about what she's hearing from the "upper echelons of Silicon Valley", and their disregard for the apocalyptic impact AI might have on humanity. Watch the full episode of Downstream on our YouTube channel.
1:46

"They're like: this is inevitable. There's nothing you can do about it. And so all that's left for us to do is to make sure that we are part of the winners, not the losers." Aaron Bastani in conversation with AI journalist Karen Hao about what she's hearing from the "upper echelons of Silicon Valley", and their disregard for the apocalyptic impact AI might have on humanity. Watch the full episode of Downstream on our YouTube channel.

Novara Media

30,518 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

JD Vance: The Tech Industry Must Be More Than Just Software for America to Thrive Recorded September 9th, 2024 at the All-In Summit, two months before the 2024 election: "If you look at the real innovation in the American economy, it's been in the world of software." "If you look at where the economy has been most stagnant, it's been in basically the heavily regulated parts of the economy, which is where 90% of the people that I represent in the Senate and 80% of the people that I hope to represent as their vice president actually make their living, run their business, and go to work every single day." "When I think about tech, one of the things I'd like us to do is broaden the aperture a little bit and think about innovation not just in software, but innovation in transportation and logistics and innovation in energy and the whole suite of things." "Because unless our economy is actually technologically innovative, then a stagnant economy is fundamentally like the worst thing." "And I think a lot of America's pathologies right now stem from the fact that we feel like we live in a very zero-sum country, because in some ways we do." "When the economy's growing 4, 5, 6% a year, then Democrats can kind of get what they want, Republicans kind of can kind of get what they want, and it all makes sense." "If the economy's growing between 0 and 1% a year, then I think it makes the whole society and our political system much more insane." "And I think it's kind of a subtext of what's been going on in this country for the last 30 years."
1:11

JD Vance: The Tech Industry Must Be More Than Just Software for America to Thrive Recorded September 9th, 2024 at the All-In Summit, two months before the 2024 election: "If you look at the real innovation in the American economy, it's been in the world of software." "If you look at where the economy has been most stagnant, it's been in basically the heavily regulated parts of the economy, which is where 90% of the people that I represent in the Senate and 80% of the people that I hope to represent as their vice president actually make their living, run their business, and go to work every single day." "When I think about tech, one of the things I'd like us to do is broaden the aperture a little bit and think about innovation not just in software, but innovation in transportation and logistics and innovation in energy and the whole suite of things." "Because unless our economy is actually technologically innovative, then a stagnant economy is fundamentally like the worst thing." "And I think a lot of America's pathologies right now stem from the fact that we feel like we live in a very zero-sum country, because in some ways we do." "When the economy's growing 4, 5, 6% a year, then Democrats can kind of get what they want, Republicans kind of can kind of get what they want, and it all makes sense." "If the economy's growing between 0 and 1% a year, then I think it makes the whole society and our political system much more insane." "And I think it's kind of a subtext of what's been going on in this country for the last 30 years."

The All-In Podcast

51,879 просмотров • 1 год назад

Chamath: Frontier AI Leaders “Created a Total F*cking Mess” Short-sighted fearmongering and immaturity from frontier AI leaders has created deep mistrust, threatening AI’s potential as an open engine of economic mobility. That mistrust gives hyperscalers the chance to position themselves as trusted gatekeepers, using KYC, audit trails, and compliance infrastructure to turn AI into an oligopoly. Chamath Palihapitiya on the All-In Pod: “I think the leaders of the frontier labs leave a lot to be desired. I think what we're seeing is a consistent pattern of evasiveness and immaturity, and I think that does a huge disservice to the entire movement of AI. The key to a vibrant life is rooted in economic mobility, and I think AI is the grand leveler. It is the thing that can enable everyone to have unique amounts of economic mobility because they are unencumbered to figure out what their upper bound is. And against that backdrop, we have to live in this constant doomerism, hype cycle, naivety, and I think it holds us back. How does it hold us back? Tactically, number one, it creates mistrust. I think that Silicon Valley was already decaying in the prestige that it held in American society. We built important things. Then we veered away from that, and we started building less important things. And now we're at a point where we've potentially started to rebuild important things again, but we have this veneer of negativity and mistrust that are created in large part because we just cannot get our sh*t together. And the leaders of the frontier labs are public enemy number one. Number two, I think what it creates, which I think is bad, but what it creates is an incredible opportunity for the hyperscalers. And the very simple opportunity is to convince governments all around the world, not just America, that they should be the gatekeeper. A: You can't trust these guys. B: These models are all over the place. C: Let us be the ones that provision them to the world. We will wrap it in KYC. I've been now talking about KYC for a while, right? Who are these customers? Do they have identification? Why are they allowed to run these models? What are they prompting? Let's keep them so that there's an audit trail. All of these things are going to become issues. The Frontier Lab folks made it an issue because of how they've handled all of this up until now. And what does that create? Now that creates an oligopoly for AI, the most powerful economically leveling instrument we've ever seen in the hands of maybe a handful of hyperscalers, who by the way, would make an incredibly compelling argument, and they would be right. And the only counterfactual to it would be, ‘Well, trust us, guys, it should actually be much more open and in a far more distributed environment.’ Can you imagine the cost and the complexity if you ask the neoscaler to build the same robust KYC or the same VPC infrastructure that Amazon and Microsoft and Google have spent decades investing trillions of dollars in? It's an impossibility, Jason. So you can take all of those datacenters off the map. You can take all of the neoscaler market off the map. All of this was preventable. So instead of a diverse, robust, open ecosystem giving a tool that is the fundamental unlock for humans, we are now going to debate gatekeeping and duopoly versus oligopoly. They have created a total f*cking mess, and it's a shame.”
3:26

Chamath: Frontier AI Leaders “Created a Total F*cking Mess” Short-sighted fearmongering and immaturity from frontier AI leaders has created deep mistrust, threatening AI’s potential as an open engine of economic mobility. That mistrust gives hyperscalers the chance to position themselves as trusted gatekeepers, using KYC, audit trails, and compliance infrastructure to turn AI into an oligopoly. Chamath Palihapitiya on the All-In Pod: “I think the leaders of the frontier labs leave a lot to be desired. I think what we're seeing is a consistent pattern of evasiveness and immaturity, and I think that does a huge disservice to the entire movement of AI. The key to a vibrant life is rooted in economic mobility, and I think AI is the grand leveler. It is the thing that can enable everyone to have unique amounts of economic mobility because they are unencumbered to figure out what their upper bound is. And against that backdrop, we have to live in this constant doomerism, hype cycle, naivety, and I think it holds us back. How does it hold us back? Tactically, number one, it creates mistrust. I think that Silicon Valley was already decaying in the prestige that it held in American society. We built important things. Then we veered away from that, and we started building less important things. And now we're at a point where we've potentially started to rebuild important things again, but we have this veneer of negativity and mistrust that are created in large part because we just cannot get our sh*t together. And the leaders of the frontier labs are public enemy number one. Number two, I think what it creates, which I think is bad, but what it creates is an incredible opportunity for the hyperscalers. And the very simple opportunity is to convince governments all around the world, not just America, that they should be the gatekeeper. A: You can't trust these guys. B: These models are all over the place. C: Let us be the ones that provision them to the world. We will wrap it in KYC. I've been now talking about KYC for a while, right? Who are these customers? Do they have identification? Why are they allowed to run these models? What are they prompting? Let's keep them so that there's an audit trail. All of these things are going to become issues. The Frontier Lab folks made it an issue because of how they've handled all of this up until now. And what does that create? Now that creates an oligopoly for AI, the most powerful economically leveling instrument we've ever seen in the hands of maybe a handful of hyperscalers, who by the way, would make an incredibly compelling argument, and they would be right. And the only counterfactual to it would be, ‘Well, trust us, guys, it should actually be much more open and in a far more distributed environment.’ Can you imagine the cost and the complexity if you ask the neoscaler to build the same robust KYC or the same VPC infrastructure that Amazon and Microsoft and Google have spent decades investing trillions of dollars in? It's an impossibility, Jason. So you can take all of those datacenters off the map. You can take all of the neoscaler market off the map. All of this was preventable. So instead of a diverse, robust, open ecosystem giving a tool that is the fundamental unlock for humans, we are now going to debate gatekeeping and duopoly versus oligopoly. They have created a total f*cking mess, and it's a shame.”

The All-In Podcast

141,660 просмотров • 25 дней назад

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:
3:45

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

542,958 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Avi Patel (Avi Patel) CEO of Kled (Kled AI) explains the situation with Luel, says he welcomes competition but larping in Silicon Valley has gotten out of hand: "You go fund this company run by an 18-year-old that dropped out of Berkeley... that one-to-one ripped off my entire company and then on top of that also is faking their compliance." "On their user page, which shows the live user count, it was a manual number counter that was going up. It wasn't even like something that was pulled from an actual place." "50% of their web traffic was from Nigeria... they are manually going out there and bolstering their numbers with Nigeria and actively accepting these fraudulent uploads so that they can look good in front of investors." "As an investor of Silicon Valley that is supposed to be prestigious and honourable... there is no world in a million years where you should give that company $31 million."
3:32

Avi Patel (Avi Patel) CEO of Kled (Kled AI) explains the situation with Luel, says he welcomes competition but larping in Silicon Valley has gotten out of hand: "You go fund this company run by an 18-year-old that dropped out of Berkeley... that one-to-one ripped off my entire company and then on top of that also is faking their compliance." "On their user page, which shows the live user count, it was a manual number counter that was going up. It wasn't even like something that was pulled from an actual place." "50% of their web traffic was from Nigeria... they are manually going out there and bolstering their numbers with Nigeria and actively accepting these fraudulent uploads so that they can look good in front of investors." "As an investor of Silicon Valley that is supposed to be prestigious and honourable... there is no world in a million years where you should give that company $31 million."

etn.

115,817 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Buttigieg: We have to recognize that if something's going to take a long time, that's all the more reason to do it now. If it's going to take 10 or 20 years to do an amendment, then we ought to be underway yesterday on this, right? And here again, whether it's the civil rights community and the struggle for empowerment of black voters or frankly some of the objectives of the conservative movement that started in the 1970s with ideas that were considered crazy then. The idea you would go after social security, the idea you would go after a right to choose—frankly, the idea you would go after the Voting Rights Act would have seemed extreme. And they patiently built up their power until they could do it. But I think that patience has to be matched with a kind of impatience for what we can do right now
2:52

Buttigieg: We have to recognize that if something's going to take a long time, that's all the more reason to do it now. If it's going to take 10 or 20 years to do an amendment, then we ought to be underway yesterday on this, right? And here again, whether it's the civil rights community and the struggle for empowerment of black voters or frankly some of the objectives of the conservative movement that started in the 1970s with ideas that were considered crazy then. The idea you would go after social security, the idea you would go after a right to choose—frankly, the idea you would go after the Voting Rights Act would have seemed extreme. And they patiently built up their power until they could do it. But I think that patience has to be matched with a kind of impatience for what we can do right now

Acyn

16,132 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk: A lot of companies are honey traps for talented engineers. Tesla and SpaceX aren't honey traps. We're demanding and you'll get a lot of shit done. “I consider one of my core responsibilities running companies to have an environment where great engineers can flourish. I think in a lot of companies, maybe most companies, if somebody's a really talented, driven engineer, their talents are suppressed. At some of the companies the engineering talent is suppressed in a way that is maybe not obviously bad, but where it's just so comfortable and you're paid so much money but the output you actually have to produce is so low that it's like a honey trap. There's a few honey trap places in Silicon Valley where they don't necessarily seem like bad places for engineers, but you have to say a good engineer went in and what did they get out? And the output of that engineering talent seems very low, even though they seem to be enjoying themselves. That's why I call it, there's a few honey trap companies in Silicon Valley. Tesla is not a honey trap. We're demanding and you're going to get a lot of shit done. And it's gonna be really cool and it's not gonna be easy, but if you are a super-talented engineer, your talents will be used, I think to a greater degree than anywhere else. SpaceX is also that way.” Tesla AI Day, September 30, 2022
1:41

Elon Musk: A lot of companies are honey traps for talented engineers. Tesla and SpaceX aren't honey traps. We're demanding and you'll get a lot of shit done. “I consider one of my core responsibilities running companies to have an environment where great engineers can flourish. I think in a lot of companies, maybe most companies, if somebody's a really talented, driven engineer, their talents are suppressed. At some of the companies the engineering talent is suppressed in a way that is maybe not obviously bad, but where it's just so comfortable and you're paid so much money but the output you actually have to produce is so low that it's like a honey trap. There's a few honey trap places in Silicon Valley where they don't necessarily seem like bad places for engineers, but you have to say a good engineer went in and what did they get out? And the output of that engineering talent seems very low, even though they seem to be enjoying themselves. That's why I call it, there's a few honey trap companies in Silicon Valley. Tesla is not a honey trap. We're demanding and you're going to get a lot of shit done. And it's gonna be really cool and it's not gonna be easy, but if you are a super-talented engineer, your talents will be used, I think to a greater degree than anywhere else. SpaceX is also that way.” Tesla AI Day, September 30, 2022

ELON CLIPS

18,088,715 просмотров • 1 год назад