Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

David Sacks when it comes to dunking on Dario and Sam for AI regulatory capture

BoringBiz_'s profile picture

Boring_Business

208,021 subscribers

95,549 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 3

Фото профиля Big Paper Carry
Big Paper Carry1 день назад

He’s the true libertarian GOAT

Фото профиля neo
neo1 день назад

Regulatory capture dunks are entertainment. Diligence still maps which AI vendors can capture your portco's roadmap via lock-in.

Фото профиля Hannes Hennche
Hannes Hennche22 часов назад

Just has 5% of the reach of the doomers, people don’t want to hear truth.

Похожие видео

🚨NEW: David Sacks, AI and Crypto Czar (David Sacks) speaks about DeepSeek and the implications for National Security on FOX News
6:38

🚨NEW: David Sacks, AI and Crypto Czar (David Sacks) speaks about DeepSeek and the implications for National Security on FOX News

Autism Capital 🧩

559,402 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sacks drops an absolute bar, criticizing Anthropic for using “distillation” as a door to regulatory capture “If stopping distillation was its primary objective, Anthropic would push to stop Chinese access to American models, not American access to Chinese models.” - David Sacks
3:12

Sacks drops an absolute bar, criticizing Anthropic for using “distillation” as a door to regulatory capture “If stopping distillation was its primary objective, Anthropic would push to stop Chinese access to American models, not American access to Chinese models.” - David Sacks

Compound248 💰

69,962 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

President Trump Says David Sacks is the "King of Intellect" for AI and Crypto
0:25

President Trump Says David Sacks is the "King of Intellect" for AI and Crypto

Chief Nerd

34,425 просмотров • 1 год назад

Trump AI adviser David Sacks blamed "overheated rhetoric around AI" for the attacks on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's home. “I don't think that AI poses all the safety issues that it's been accused of, and I think it's beyond wrong to try and take that out on a corporate executive," he told our Dasha Burns on #TheConversation. 🎧
1:24

Trump AI adviser David Sacks blamed "overheated rhetoric around AI" for the attacks on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's home. “I don't think that AI poses all the safety issues that it's been accused of, and I think it's beyond wrong to try and take that out on a corporate executive," he told our Dasha Burns on #TheConversation. 🎧

POLITICO

34,820 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

What forced Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Dario Amodei to come together and acknowledge threats of AI?
2:56

What forced Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Dario Amodei to come together and acknowledge threats of AI?

Kashif Raza

249,374 просмотров • 1 день назад

DATA CENTERS: On All-In, David Friedberg & David Sacks warn the real AI threat is regulatory panic: activist campaigns & red tape strangling data centers, energy & compute while China builds. America's lead is narrow. Unilateral disarmament threatens both our economy and our national security.
26:26

DATA CENTERS: On All-In, David Friedberg & David Sacks warn the real AI threat is regulatory panic: activist campaigns & red tape strangling data centers, energy & compute while China builds. America's lead is narrow. Unilateral disarmament threatens both our economy and our national security.

@amuse

13,308 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

When the time comes for David Peralta to hang up his cleats, he wants to be remembered for giving it all he had - both on and off the field. ❤️🇻🇪 #HispanicHeritageMonth David Peralta
1:38

When the time comes for David Peralta to hang up his cleats, he wants to be remembered for giving it all he had - both on and off the field. ❤️🇻🇪 #HispanicHeritageMonth David Peralta

MLBPA

24,845 просмотров • 2 лет назад

AI Czar David Sacks: "Technologies like AI—they will expand access to care, cut administrative costs, reduce fraud, and deliver better results for patients and doctors."
0:57

AI Czar David Sacks: "Technologies like AI—they will expand access to care, cut administrative costs, reduce fraud, and deliver better results for patients and doctors."

Trump War Room

33,210 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sama to Dario after he spooked the spooks and kickstarted the current regulatory slowdown regime for frontier models
0:30

Sama to Dario after he spooked the spooks and kickstarted the current regulatory slowdown regime for frontier models

Beff (e/acc)

21,044 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Sacks: If Dario Got His Way on AI Regulation, It Would Destroy Anthropic David Sacks: “There's a huge irony in the fact that Dario did not get his way in Washington for the most part. Because I think if he had realized his dream of this highly regulated AI apparatus, I don't think (Anthropic) would be set up for a hugely successful IPO. Why? Because their whole right to charge this massive premium for tokens is because they're six months ahead of those open models, and that six months would be eaten up in the blink of an eye if they were subject to regulatory approval. Dario himself keeps writing these blog posts where he says, ‘We need an FAA for AI.’ You know how long it takes the FAA to certify and approve a new model, in this case for airframes? Minimum of five years! You're going to apply that regulatory framework to AI model releases?” @jason: “Game over.” Sacks: “Forget about it. Your six months will be gone like that. Your model will be commoditized, the Chinese competitors will catch up, and that's bad for the United States, it's bad for our competitiveness, it's bad for the AI race. But aside from just the geopolitical dimension, it'd be horrible for Anthropic as a company because, again, all their pricing power depends on them remaining in the lead. If they ever slip up and lose that six months, they're toast.” Jason: “What does that do to revenue?” Sacks: “Exactly. A decent subset of the market is willing to pay a premium for true frontier intelligence. But Anthropic and OpenAI are on that hamster wheel. They have to stay in the lead in order to justify that premium.”
1:31

Sacks: If Dario Got His Way on AI Regulation, It Would Destroy Anthropic David Sacks: “There's a huge irony in the fact that Dario did not get his way in Washington for the most part. Because I think if he had realized his dream of this highly regulated AI apparatus, I don't think (Anthropic) would be set up for a hugely successful IPO. Why? Because their whole right to charge this massive premium for tokens is because they're six months ahead of those open models, and that six months would be eaten up in the blink of an eye if they were subject to regulatory approval. Dario himself keeps writing these blog posts where he says, ‘We need an FAA for AI.’ You know how long it takes the FAA to certify and approve a new model, in this case for airframes? Minimum of five years! You're going to apply that regulatory framework to AI model releases?” @jason: “Game over.” Sacks: “Forget about it. Your six months will be gone like that. Your model will be commoditized, the Chinese competitors will catch up, and that's bad for the United States, it's bad for our competitiveness, it's bad for the AI race. But aside from just the geopolitical dimension, it'd be horrible for Anthropic as a company because, again, all their pricing power depends on them remaining in the lead. If they ever slip up and lose that six months, they're toast.” Jason: “What does that do to revenue?” Sacks: “Exactly. A decent subset of the market is willing to pay a premium for true frontier intelligence. But Anthropic and OpenAI are on that hamster wheel. They have to stay in the lead in order to justify that premium.”

The All-In Podcast

47,623 просмотров • 29 дней назад

🇺🇸 LATEST: Crypto Czar David Sacks breaks down how regulatory uncertainty almost led the crypto industry to leave the United States:
1:41

🇺🇸 LATEST: Crypto Czar David Sacks breaks down how regulatory uncertainty almost led the crypto industry to leave the United States:

CoinDesk

42,405 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

NEWS: Sam Altman (OpenAI) and Dario Amodei (Anthropic) refuse to hold hands at the India AI Impact Summit.
0:22

NEWS: Sam Altman (OpenAI) and Dario Amodei (Anthropic) refuse to hold hands at the India AI Impact Summit.

Exec Sum

3,017,194 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

David Sacks: We're lucky that Trump's the President when this AI revolution is happening. @jason "Do an alt history, Sacks, what would happen if Kamala Ding Dong was in right now?" David Sacks "We'd have no data centers, and they'd be using AI to censor us, and they'd be promoting DEI values through AI. That was in the Biden executive order. President Trump just wants the country to win and be successful.
1:16

David Sacks: We're lucky that Trump's the President when this AI revolution is happening. @jason "Do an alt history, Sacks, what would happen if Kamala Ding Dong was in right now?" David Sacks "We'd have no data centers, and they'd be using AI to censor us, and they'd be promoting DEI values through AI. That was in the Biden executive order. President Trump just wants the country to win and be successful.

jay plemons

96,763 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

David Sacks says an open-source AI ban is coming, disguised as holding open models to the same standard as closed "I got bad news for you, Chamath. An open source ban is coming. They're not going to call it that." "You know what they're going to say? They're going to say that we simply have to apply the same standards to open models that we apply to closed." "Okay, here's how they do it step by step. Let me explain how regulatory capture actually works." "So first of all, you got to get this regulatory apparatus. Okay, Dario wants an FDA for AI, but he doesn't have enough political support for that, so instead they do this Trojan horse of a FINRA for AI." "They call it self-regulating, it's not really, but anyway that gets them off the ground. Now they've created the standard-setting organization. Now they've got pre-release model testing. Then the pressure grows to codify that in law."
0:38

David Sacks says an open-source AI ban is coming, disguised as holding open models to the same standard as closed "I got bad news for you, Chamath. An open source ban is coming. They're not going to call it that." "You know what they're going to say? They're going to say that we simply have to apply the same standards to open models that we apply to closed." "Okay, here's how they do it step by step. Let me explain how regulatory capture actually works." "So first of all, you got to get this regulatory apparatus. Okay, Dario wants an FDA for AI, but he doesn't have enough political support for that, so instead they do this Trojan horse of a FINRA for AI." "They call it self-regulating, it's not really, but anyway that gets them off the ground. Now they've created the standard-setting organization. Now they've got pre-release model testing. Then the pressure grows to codify that in law."

Fireside Alpha

234,174 просмотров • 24 дней назад

David Sacks & Friedberg on How a ‘DMV for AI’ Would Handicap the U.S. Against China “China is going to win if we do this … You should look at China's rocket that they landed yesterday. It's completely steel … and Elon's still waiting for FAA approval on his steel Starship. You could actually watch it playing out in China, where their regulatory agencies are allowing them to move much more quickly.”
1:45

David Sacks & Friedberg on How a ‘DMV for AI’ Would Handicap the U.S. Against China “China is going to win if we do this … You should look at China's rocket that they landed yesterday. It's completely steel … and Elon's still waiting for FAA approval on his steel Starship. You could actually watch it playing out in China, where their regulatory agencies are allowing them to move much more quickly.”

Chief Nerd

29,606 просмотров • 23 дней назад