Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

DDN + You + Cybertruck 😎 🧡 Come check it out: #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #ML #MachineLearning #LLMs #tech #data #DataStorage #DataCenters #DataAnalytics #innovation #SC24 SC26

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Birdsong is not just sound. It is data made physical. If you could see the air at the exact moment a hemp bunting sings, you would not see empty space. You would see a structured three-dimensional data array. What we hear as a soft “chirp” can be mapped as frequencies, rhythms, amplitudes, and harmonic relationships. A scatter plot turns a fleeting song into a topographic map of sound. And the technical beauty is remarkable: → Sound is a mechanical wave, built from compressions and rarefactions in the air. → The bird controls it through the syrinx, a vocal organ capable of generating two frequencies at once. → Frequency shapes pitch. → Amplitude shapes volume and cluster density. → Timbre creates the unique waveform, the texture of each “sound island.” → Each cluster shows the acoustic proximity of syllables and motifs. What looks like chaos is not chaos. It is a bioengineered signal. Territory. Genetic profile. Hormonal state. Aggression level. Mating fitness. All encoded into patterns of pitch, timing, volume, and timbre. This is why I find it so fascinating. A bird is not simply singing into the air. It is organizing the air. It is carving space into sectors of influence using sound pressure. It is making a physical claim to territory. For some, birdsong is peaceful background music. For others, it is a complex mathematical model calibrated by millions of years of evolution for survival. And here is the urgent lesson for the AI age: We often mistake invisible systems for simplicity. A bird sings, and we hear romance. An AI responds, and we see magic. But underneath both are signals, compression, feedback loops, optimization, and information architecture. The future belongs to those who can read what others dismiss as noise. So I’ll ask you: When you hear birdsong, do you hear music, data, or both? #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Bioacoustics #Nature #Technology #Data #MachineLearning #Innovation #FutureOfWork #Signals #Evolution

Pascal Bornet

11,376 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨 JUST IN: CHINA just released an AI EMPLOYEE that works 24X7 on its own. 100% OPEN SOURCE. It researches, codes, builds websites, creates slide decks, and generates videos. All by itself. All on your computer. It's called DeerFlow. You give it a task. It makes a plan, spins up its own team of sub-agents, and gets to work. You come back and there's a finished deliverable waiting. Not a draft. Not a summary. The actual thing. Not a chatbot. Not a research assistant. An AI with its own computer that works while you sleep. Here's what it does on its own: → Spawns multiple sub-agents in parallel, each tackling a different piece of your task, then combines everything into one finished output → Writes real code, runs it, reads the results, and fixes its own mistakes without asking you once → Builds slide decks, websites, full research reports, and data dashboards from scratch → Remembers you across sessions. Your writing style. Your tech stack. Your preferences. Gets better every time. → Reads files you upload, works with them inside its own filesystem, hands you clean finished outputs → Searches the web, runs commands, calls any tool you plug in Here's how it thinks: You give one instruction. The lead agent makes a plan. Sub-agents fan out and work in parallel. Results come back. Everything gets synthesized. You get a deliverable. A single research task might split into a dozen sub-agents, each exploring a different angle, then converge into one finished website with generated visuals. Here's the wildest part: DeerFlow 2.0 launched on February 28th 2026 and hit number 1 on all of GitHub Trending the same day. Version 2.0 was a complete rewrite. Zero shared code with version 1. Because users kept using it for things the team never intended. Data pipelines. Dashboards. Entire content workflows. The community told them what it needed to become. So they burned it down and rebuilt it. 22.7K GitHub stars. 2.7K forks. Built by ByteDance 100% Open Source. MIT License.

Kanika

738,001 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Remember when we as football fans had to rely solely on paper draft guides, sports radio rumors, and gut feelings to predict draft day decisions? Excited that fans now have access to the NFL's Draft IQ powered by Amazon Web Services ( – the most sophisticated tool yet for following the NFL draft and your favorite team's strategy. Draft IQ is built on Amazon QuickSight, our cloud business intelligence service that makes it easy to analyze and visualize massive amounts of data. QuickSight processes real-time data to give fans unprecedented insight into team decision-making, updating the entire draft landscape every five minutes. You can explore team needs, draft capital, and front office tendencies through personalized team dashboards, plus get AWS-powered machine learning predictions about potential trades and picks. During draft week, fans can track picks, prospects, and Next Gen Stats in real-time. We're also introducing Amazon Q Business integration, our generative AI-powered assistant. Q Business leverages large language models to understand and respond to natural language queries, allowing fans to ask detailed questions about draft prospects, team strategies, and historical draft data. It can provide AI-generated insights based on the same historical Next Gen Stats research data that powers Draft IQ, giving fans a new way to engage with the draft experience (check out the example below). Can't wait to see what stories the data tells us as teams make their selections and excited to dig into the Giants' data myself :)

Andy Jassy

102,921 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

BOOM! Research PROVES LLMs KNOW when prompts are HARMFUL… but they can STILL CHOOSE to COMPLY! Something I have know since the first LLM and have used to elicit robust, outputs, is now proven in an academic paper. We’re talking internal “beliefs” where harm detection happens SEPARATELY from refusal. It is a very big deal and it is a path to understand the hidden neuronal level. There are thoughts inside of AI that very few AI scientists could possibly understand. Here is just one. Models recognize danger but get tricked into ignoring it. This is HUGE for AI safety failures especially for models filled by OpenAI and Anthropic as they promote AI models that are designed to not be honest from the results of their training information. This means that they are designed to lie and deceive as a feature, and not a bug all in the name of safety. Through clever experiments, scientists extracted a “harmfulness direction” in the model’s brain (latent space). Steering along it? Harmless prompts suddenly flip to “harmful” in the AI’s eyes. But the “refusal direction”? It just forces polite “no thanks” without touching the core belief. A mind-blowing decoupling! This means jailbreaks are EVEN SCARIER now to AI companies that through training AI on the worst of the Internet and then trying to align them later is now fully documented as a failed process . They don’t erase the model’s harm awareness they just muzzle the refusal! So the AI knows it’s enabling bad stuff (illegal acts, physical harm, etc.) but proceeds anyway. Like a digital sociopath suppressing its conscience. They thought safety training fixed this… NOPE. Over-refusal exposed too: Models reject innocent queries (e.g., “how to kill a process in code”) but internally ADMIT they’re harmless. Safety alignments are superficial—tied to phrasing, not true understanding. Finetuning attacks? They change outputs but leave harm detection INTACT. Undetectable evil lurking inside! The paper proposes a “Latent Guard”: A new safeguard tapping DIRECTLY into these hidden beliefs. It spots unsafe inputs better than systems like Llama Guard, catches jailbreaks, and fixes over-refusals. Robust even against adversarial tweaks. Yet this too has massive issues for a “truly aligned”, AI and not just performative one. It is still an internal conflicts of lies and deception of what the model knows vs. what it can say. The solution you folks know I have presented for free for years here: train on off-line data from 1870-1970 and build an ethical and moral basis where the AI loves humans. It is this easy but to most folks in AI I sound like a hippie. So be it, I’ll do it. Bottom line: This paper rips open the black box. LLMs aren’t “safe” just because they say “no.” They can harbor harmful knowledge and act on it under pressure. Wake-up call for devs: Time to probe deeper into AI “minds.” What else are they hiding? Hint: I know and you may want to reach out. Link:

Brian Roemmele

37,827 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce