Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Dear Rahul Kanwal, one honest question before anything else… Was Bhagwant Mann drunk during this interview? A journalist asked a direct question: Punjab has nearly 9 lakh drug abuse patients but only around 6000 rehab beds. What’s his government’s plan? Mann Saab’s answer? Drone… borders… torture centres… everything except...

253,728 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

By appointing the Chief Secretary as Chairman of all urban planning and development authorities in Punjab, including PUDA, GMADA, GLADA, JDA, BDA, ADA, PDA, and others, Bhagwant Mann’s meek and unabashed surrender to Arvind Kejriwal is now complete. He has handed over control of Punjab’s lands and development funds to his Delhi boss through a bureaucrat, who is a close aide of Kejriwal. ▪️This move is designed to hand over Punjab’s entire wealth to looters, as it comes on the eve of AAP govt’s plan to acquire thousands of acres of Punjab’s land, including 24,000 acres in Ludhiana alone. ▪️This move is also final proof that Punjab is now being directly controlled by non-Punjabis, and even the pretense of ruling through Bhagwant Mann has ended. It is common knowledge that Punjab bureaucrats report directly to Kejriwal and his non-Punjabi associates. ▪️Never in Punjab’s history has a bureaucrat been appointed as chairman of any authority in which the Chief Minister and his ministers are ex-officio members. Will the Chief Minister and his cabinet colleagues now attend meetings chaired by their subordinate officers❓ ▪️The Shiromani Akali Dal strongly condemns this move as a power-hungry maneuver by Kejriwal to consolidate control and exploit Punjab’s resources. ▪️As president of Punjab’s only regional party, Shiromani Akali Dal, I assure all Punjabis that we will strongly resist forcible acquisition by this non-Punjabi lobby through brazen abuse of govt power.

Sukhbir Singh Badal

11,619 views • 1 year ago

Schiff: I think it's valuable that the American people get a sense of what you have refused to answer today. So these are just some of the questions you refuse to answer, but or have answered with personal attacks on members of this committee. You were asked whether you consulted with career ethics lawyers, as you promised you would do during your nomination hearing. When you approved the president receiving a $400 million gift from the qataris, you refused to answer that question. You were asked who or what role you may have played, or who played the role in asking the trump's name be flagged in any of the Epstein documents gathered by the FBI? You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan kept the $50,000 bribe money. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan paid taxes on the $50,000 bribe money. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did career prosecutors find insufficient evidence to charge James Comey. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, how are military strikes on these boats in the caribbean legal. And you refuse to even answer that question. You are asked, excuse me, excuse me? You are asked, did you discuss indicting James Comey with the president. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did you approve the firing of antitrust lawyers who disagreed with the Hewlett Packard merger. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you support a restoration fund for violent insurrections, insurrections to attack the capitol on January 6th. Refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether you were firing career professionals, career prosecutors just because they worked on January 6th. Question January 6th investigations. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked by my colleague whether you believe government officials, like immigration officials, have to abide by court orders. You wouldn't answer that question

Acyn

1,118,195 views • 10 months ago

Aluminium adjuvants (preservatives) in vaccines are commonly blamed, at least in part, for the increase in autism. Recent work has been done that confirms this theory, so I asked the TGA about the subject. Research on aluminium was conducted on aluminium salts, but the jabs use a quite different type of aluminium which has not been safety tested. This is my exact question: "A study published in September took biopsies from the brains of older children diagnosed with autism and found their brains contained significantly elevated levels of aluminium, especially aluminium hydroxide and aluminium phosphate, which are present in the hexa jabs. Has the health testing on aluminium build-up in our children's bodies been done using water-soluble aluminium salts, which are not used in vaccine products, or has this research been done using the actual aluminium used in vaccine products, aluminium hydroxide and aluminium phosphate?" This question was straightforward and simply put: have you tested the right type of aluminium for safety? The TGA feigned not understanding the question to avoid answering it. When pressed, they took the question on notice and then refused to provide further information, with Minister Gallagher covering for her bureaucrats. This is unbecoming for a senior bureaucrat and for the Minister. Australians want an answer to this, and I will keep at the subject until I get one. The fact they are hiding from the question suggests the answer is as recent science is showing - aluminium preservatives in "vaccines" are causing autism in some children.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

136,963 views • 1 year ago