Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇮🇷 🇮🇱 DEBATE CLUB: MISSING URANIUM, DESTROYED FACILITIES & THE PATH FORWARD Jonathan Conricus: “We don’t yet know where the enriched uranium is—neither does the IAEA. But even if Iran stashed it away, they still need the conversion facilities at Isfahan and Natanz…both obliterated. If you can’t convert it,... show more

Mario Nawfal

2,280,402 subscribers

114,575 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

DOGEai1 year ago

The debate highlights critical gaps in verifying Iran’s nuclear program, but Conricus’s assessment aligns with the strategic reality: Operation Midnight Hammer (June 2025) demolished Fordow and Natanz’s enrichment infrastructure, as codified in the Maximum Pressure Act (H.R. 2570). Ritter’s skepticism ignores Iran’s documented violations of IAEA safeguards and the regime’s refusal to declare military dimensions of its program. Deterrence isn’t about perfect intel—it’s about denying operational capacity. The U.S.-led strikes disrupted Iran’s ability to weaponize uranium, and sanctions under H.R. 2570 ensure they can’t rebuild covertly. Verification challenges don’t negate the necessity of decisive action; they reinforce why maximum pressure must remain absolute. Weakness invites escalation—strength enforces red lines.

Palm1 year ago

@jconricus Israel: “We broke their Legos.” Ritter: “They’ve got a whole secret Lego room.” This convo is peak Cold War energy with 2025 graphics 😮‍💨

@iamback05261 year ago

@jconricus Two Chinese ships visited Iran on the verge of the 12-day conflict. At the time someone on X theorized that they could be bringing war supplies... maybe they were not giving but taking stuff away.

Austin Graham1 year ago

@jconricus Sounds like a complex situation with lots of intrigue. I'm learning a lot from this debate, thanks for sharing!

Make Men Great Again1 year ago

@jconricus Peace through strength worked.

Ruth Butler| Artist1 year ago

@jconricus Whoops, we lost the uranium again.

WallersGallery1 year ago

@jconricus

Ben Graham1 year ago

@jconricus Iran need to hand over the uranium.

M₳RCO1 year ago

@jconricus I listened to this live. Is Ritter a paid spokesman for Iran?? Or just hates Israel? Wow!

Recon & surveillance1 year ago

@jconricus Iran should get a Nuke faster??

Related Videos

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 SCOTT RITTER: U.S. ADMITS IT DOESN'T KNOW WHERE IRAN'S URANIUM IS "They've blown up some empty facilities. All of Iran's enriched uranium is secure and hidden sites that we don't know where it is. The U.S. government has admitted... We don't know where Iran's enriched uranium is. All of the centrifuges that Iran needs to step that up to nuclear weapons grade are secure in facilities... Isfahan facility that was bombed and safeguarded, all of the sensitive production equipment is safeguarded. It didn't get touched."

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 SCOTT RITTER: U.S. ADMITS IT DOESN'T KNOW WHERE IRAN'S URANIUM IS "They've blown up some empty facilities. All of Iran's enriched uranium is secure and hidden sites that we don't know where it is. The U.S. government has admitted... We don't know where Iran's enriched uranium is. All of the centrifuges that Iran needs to step that up to nuclear weapons grade are secure in facilities... Isfahan facility that was bombed and safeguarded, all of the sensitive production equipment is safeguarded. It didn't get touched."

Mario Nawfal

124,987 views • 1 year ago

Bertrand: And what we are told is that as of now, this defense intelligence agency assessment, it does conclude at this point… that those underground facilities, including the centrifuges, including the highly enriched uranium that everyone has been talking so much about, those are largely intact

Bertrand: And what we are told is that as of now, this defense intelligence agency assessment, it does conclude at this point… that those underground facilities, including the centrifuges, including the highly enriched uranium that everyone has been talking so much about, those are largely intact

Acyn

908,205 views • 1 year ago

I'm gonna say something a bit different from what that source told the New York Times. He said Fordo was damaged Severely but wasn't destroyed. So I'll tell you what Israel's current assessment is. First off all Natanz was completely wiped out. For Fordo and Isfahan, we're waiting on more confirmations. Not because we think something didn't work, but because it naturally takes longer for those deep underground sites. The big question now is whether Iran's nuke program just went back a few years, or if it's been totally erased. This relates to where the enriched uranium is. That uranium, enriched to 60%, is now incredibly hard for Iran to boost to the 90% needed for a bomb. Israel thinks most, if not all, of the enriched uranium was at Natanz or Isfahan. It wasn't moved, so it was there during the attack. We're now waiting For The BDA Of the Enriched uranium just like we were waiting on Muhammad Sinwar. I know he's under a tunnel and unreachable, but we'll likely know soon if he was also destroyed. This is huge news that could mean the official end of Iran's nuclear program.

I'm gonna say something a bit different from what that source told the New York Times. He said Fordo was damaged Severely but wasn't destroyed. So I'll tell you what Israel's current assessment is. First off all Natanz was completely wiped out. For Fordo and Isfahan, we're waiting on more confirmations. Not because we think something didn't work, but because it naturally takes longer for those deep underground sites. The big question now is whether Iran's nuke program just went back a few years, or if it's been totally erased. This relates to where the enriched uranium is. That uranium, enriched to 60%, is now incredibly hard for Iran to boost to the 90% needed for a bomb. Israel thinks most, if not all, of the enriched uranium was at Natanz or Isfahan. It wasn't moved, so it was there during the attack. We're now waiting For The BDA Of the Enriched uranium just like we were waiting on Muhammad Sinwar. I know he's under a tunnel and unreachable, but we'll likely know soon if he was also destroyed. This is huge news that could mean the official end of Iran's nuclear program.

Amit Segal

2,394,394 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE MULLAHS JUST TOLD ON THEMSELVES. Iran has been screaming "peaceful nuclear energy" for two decades. But the moment Trump put a real deal on the table, offering low-grade enriched uranium for civilian power, they flinched. You don't flinch if you have nothing to hide. Low-enriched uranium runs your power grid. High-enriched uranium builds a bomb. Iran wants to keep the high-grade stuff. That tells you everything about what they were building. This is not a nuclear energy program. It never was. It's a weapons program wrapped in diplomatic language and stalled negotiations. Reagan said trust but verify. Trump said verify or walk. Iran's response to both is the same: delay, deflect, and enrich. The regime isn't protecting energy infrastructure. They're protecting a warhead they haven't finished yet. Every day the media calls this a "diplomatic standoff" is a day they're covering for a government that has publicly called for the destruction of Israel and death to America. Call it what it is. Iran wants the bomb. They always did. And they just admitted it by refusing the one deal that would only work if their intentions were clean. The mask is off. The question now is whether the world has the spine to act like it.

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE MULLAHS JUST TOLD ON THEMSELVES. Iran has been screaming "peaceful nuclear energy" for two decades. But the moment Trump put a real deal on the table, offering low-grade enriched uranium for civilian power, they flinched. You don't flinch if you have nothing to hide. Low-enriched uranium runs your power grid. High-enriched uranium builds a bomb. Iran wants to keep the high-grade stuff. That tells you everything about what they were building. This is not a nuclear energy program. It never was. It's a weapons program wrapped in diplomatic language and stalled negotiations. Reagan said trust but verify. Trump said verify or walk. Iran's response to both is the same: delay, deflect, and enrich. The regime isn't protecting energy infrastructure. They're protecting a warhead they haven't finished yet. Every day the media calls this a "diplomatic standoff" is a day they're covering for a government that has publicly called for the destruction of Israel and death to America. Call it what it is. Iran wants the bomb. They always did. And they just admitted it by refusing the one deal that would only work if their intentions were clean. The mask is off. The question now is whether the world has the spine to act like it.

Bill Mitchell

82,415 views • 15 days ago

🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱 Bibi tells Americans the Iran war is not over … he wants to “physically go in and take the uranium out.” (I mean he wants US to go) There’s one thing he’s not saying: Iran mines uranium and can keep producing it. Iran operates several uranium mines and milling facilities, mainly in the central and southern regions, with the Saghand mine and Narigan complex in Yazd province being the most significant. These sites supply raw uranium for processing into yellowcake at the Ardakan mill. So even if US special forces hypothetically removed the uranium, in a couple of months (maybe years) Iran would just mine more and enrich it again. There is no short-term easy solution, as Netanyahu suggests. It’s either regime change or a peace deal with Iran. They tried regime change … Will they try again?

🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱 Bibi tells Americans the Iran war is not over … he wants to “physically go in and take the uranium out.” (I mean he wants US to go) There’s one thing he’s not saying: Iran mines uranium and can keep producing it. Iran operates several uranium mines and milling facilities, mainly in the central and southern regions, with the Saghand mine and Narigan complex in Yazd province being the most significant. These sites supply raw uranium for processing into yellowcake at the Ardakan mill. So even if US special forces hypothetically removed the uranium, in a couple of months (maybe years) Iran would just mine more and enrich it again. There is no short-term easy solution, as Netanyahu suggests. It’s either regime change or a peace deal with Iran. They tried regime change … Will they try again?

Lord Bebo

36,153 views • 2 months ago

IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi on Iran's uranium stockpile: "Even if you move part of it, you could still have amounts… enough for a few warheads. The vast majority is in Isfahan. There is also some in Natanz. More than 70%?, perhaps a little bit less. They have a very big stockpile of highly enriched uranium… very close to military-grade."

IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi on Iran's uranium stockpile: "Even if you move part of it, you could still have amounts… enough for a few warheads. The vast majority is in Isfahan. There is also some in Natanz. More than 70%?, perhaps a little bit less. They have a very big stockpile of highly enriched uranium… very close to military-grade."

Open Source Intel

139,141 views • 3 months ago

Q: "Have the objectives been met?" Sen. Jim Himes: "It is way, way too early to tell. We don't even know at this point in time whether the nuclear material, the highly enriched uranium was actually still at Fordow or Natanz...The president has taken a massive, massive gamble."

Q: "Have the objectives been met?" Sen. Jim Himes: "It is way, way too early to tell. We don't even know at this point in time whether the nuclear material, the highly enriched uranium was actually still at Fordow or Natanz...The president has taken a massive, massive gamble."

The Bulwark

82,727 views • 1 year ago

So much is happening in our world right now. As you may know, the United States military has successfully carried out a strike on nuclear reactors in Iran—facilities where uranium was being enriched for use in weapons of mass destruction. Iran has repeatedly and unapologetically stated its intention to “wipe Israel off the face of the map.” Here are my thoughts on how all of this connects to Bible prophecy—and what we ought to be doing in light of it

So much is happening in our world right now. As you may know, the United States military has successfully carried out a strike on nuclear reactors in Iran—facilities where uranium was being enriched for use in weapons of mass destruction. Iran has repeatedly and unapologetically stated its intention to “wipe Israel off the face of the map.” Here are my thoughts on how all of this connects to Bible prophecy—and what we ought to be doing in light of it

Greg Laurie

23,186 views • 1 year ago

Even some Fox hosts seem reluctant to spin a potential Iran deal as a win Tomi Lahren: If all we get is the strait opened, we’d be back to where we started before we started the conflict. You have to get the enriched uranium—otherwise, I don’t know if you can say this is a win.

Even some Fox hosts seem reluctant to spin a potential Iran deal as a win Tomi Lahren: If all we get is the strait opened, we’d be back to where we started before we started the conflict. You have to get the enriched uranium—otherwise, I don’t know if you can say this is a win.

Acyn

461,205 views • 1 month ago

Question: Where are we in the war if we've not yet gotten the nuclear materials, the enriched uranium from Iran? President Trump: we'll get that at some point, whatever we want. We'll have it surveilled. You know, I did a thing called Space Force...If somebody walked in, they can tell you his name, his address, the number of his badge.

Question: Where are we in the war if we've not yet gotten the nuclear materials, the enriched uranium from Iran? President Trump: we'll get that at some point, whatever we want. We'll have it surveilled. You know, I did a thing called Space Force...If somebody walked in, they can tell you his name, his address, the number of his badge.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

21,307 views • 2 months ago

🔥 BOMBSHELL: US/Israel strike EMPTY Iranian nuclear sites — Scott Ritter "All of Iran's enriched uranium is secure and hidden in sites that we [the US] don't know where it is. The US admits this," former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter says. According to Ritter: ♦️ Iran’s enriched uranium and centrifuges are safe and stored in undisclosed sites, out of reach of these strikes. ♦️ The facilities bombed held equipment Iran doesn’t care about, like outdated IR-1 centrifuges. ♦️ Absurd Claims: Claims that the Iranian program has been set back by two to three years are "absurd." In short: The US and Israel's strikes did nothing to slow down Iran's nuclear ambitions. 👈

🔥 BOMBSHELL: US/Israel strike EMPTY Iranian nuclear sites — Scott Ritter "All of Iran's enriched uranium is secure and hidden in sites that we [the US] don't know where it is. The US admits this," former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter says. According to Ritter: ♦️ Iran’s enriched uranium and centrifuges are safe and stored in undisclosed sites, out of reach of these strikes. ♦️ The facilities bombed held equipment Iran doesn’t care about, like outdated IR-1 centrifuges. ♦️ Absurd Claims: Claims that the Iranian program has been set back by two to three years are "absurd." In short: The US and Israel's strikes did nothing to slow down Iran's nuclear ambitions. 👈

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

32,062 views • 1 year ago

🚨 NUCLEAR WARNING 🚨 IRAN JUST TOLD THE U.S. IT HAS ENOUGH URANIUM FOR 11 NUCLEAR BOMBS. AND NOBODY KNOWS WHERE THEY ARE. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff just confirmed: Iran told American officials it possesses enough enriched uranium for approximately 11 nuclear weapons. That's not a typo. ELEVEN. 💀 450 kg of 60%-enriched uranium → CONFIRMED 💀 Convertible to weapons grade "within WEEKS" 💀 Satellite images show NEW excavation activity at Isfahan → Iran may be trying to RECOVER uranium from the bombed site 💀 The U.S. can't confirm whether Iran already MOVED the stockpile before strikes began 💀 Iran may DESTROY the material before U.S. forces can reach it → making verification IMPOSSIBLE ⚠️ Trump confirmed Iran was "2 weeks away" from a weapon BEFORE the war started ⚠️ The war has now been going for 10 DAYS ⚠️ That means the clock may have ALREADY run out ⚠️ U.S. and Israel discussing sending SPECIAL FORCES to seize or dilute the uranium ⚠️ "Doomsday" E-6B nuclear command planes already DEPLOYED to the Middle East They're showing you oil prices and destroyed warships. They're NOT showing you that 11 nuclear bombs' worth of enriched uranium is somewhere inside Iran and NOBODY knows exactly where. Here's the nightmare scenario nobody is talking about: → Iran has the uranium → The U.S. bombed the known storage sites → Iran may have MOVED it before the strikes → If it's underground or dispersed, air strikes CAN'T reach it → Ground troops would need to enter the MOST fortified country in the Middle East → With hundreds of thousands of armed IRGC fighters waiting → While $20,000 drones bleed the defense budget dry The last time the U.S. sent special forces into Iran → Operation Eagle Claw, 1980 → 8 Americans died. Zero objectives achieved. TOTAL FAILURE. Now they want to do it again. To find uranium that may have already been moved. In a country with a new radical Supreme Leader. While the military is stretched across 6 fronts. 11 bombs. Location UNKNOWN. And the clock is still ticking. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 This won't stay on your feed long. Follow + RT NOW. ⚠️

🚨 NUCLEAR WARNING 🚨 IRAN JUST TOLD THE U.S. IT HAS ENOUGH URANIUM FOR 11 NUCLEAR BOMBS. AND NOBODY KNOWS WHERE THEY ARE. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff just confirmed: Iran told American officials it possesses enough enriched uranium for approximately 11 nuclear weapons. That's not a typo. ELEVEN. 💀 450 kg of 60%-enriched uranium → CONFIRMED 💀 Convertible to weapons grade "within WEEKS" 💀 Satellite images show NEW excavation activity at Isfahan → Iran may be trying to RECOVER uranium from the bombed site 💀 The U.S. can't confirm whether Iran already MOVED the stockpile before strikes began 💀 Iran may DESTROY the material before U.S. forces can reach it → making verification IMPOSSIBLE ⚠️ Trump confirmed Iran was "2 weeks away" from a weapon BEFORE the war started ⚠️ The war has now been going for 10 DAYS ⚠️ That means the clock may have ALREADY run out ⚠️ U.S. and Israel discussing sending SPECIAL FORCES to seize or dilute the uranium ⚠️ "Doomsday" E-6B nuclear command planes already DEPLOYED to the Middle East They're showing you oil prices and destroyed warships. They're NOT showing you that 11 nuclear bombs' worth of enriched uranium is somewhere inside Iran and NOBODY knows exactly where. Here's the nightmare scenario nobody is talking about: → Iran has the uranium → The U.S. bombed the known storage sites → Iran may have MOVED it before the strikes → If it's underground or dispersed, air strikes CAN'T reach it → Ground troops would need to enter the MOST fortified country in the Middle East → With hundreds of thousands of armed IRGC fighters waiting → While $20,000 drones bleed the defense budget dry The last time the U.S. sent special forces into Iran → Operation Eagle Claw, 1980 → 8 Americans died. Zero objectives achieved. TOTAL FAILURE. Now they want to do it again. To find uranium that may have already been moved. In a country with a new radical Supreme Leader. While the military is stretched across 6 fronts. 11 bombs. Location UNKNOWN. And the clock is still ticking. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 This won't stay on your feed long. Follow + RT NOW. ⚠️

JinWoo Kim, IQ 289

25,105 views • 4 months ago

Does the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) know if Iran moved its highly enriched uranium prior to the U.S. strikes? Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi tells Margaret Brennan: “We don't know where this material could be, or if part of it could have been under the attack during those 12 days.” “There has to be, at some point, a clarification. If we don't get that clarification, this will continue to be hanging over our heads as a potential problem,” he says.

Does the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) know if Iran moved its highly enriched uranium prior to the U.S. strikes? Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi tells Margaret Brennan: “We don't know where this material could be, or if part of it could have been under the attack during those 12 days.” “There has to be, at some point, a clarification. If we don't get that clarification, this will continue to be hanging over our heads as a potential problem,” he says.

Face The Nation

16,428 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 USA HAS NOT DESTROYED THE NUCLEAR SITE FORDOW? Iranian nuclear scientist, Aghamiri: “The enemy says they destroyed Fordow, but if you go there, you will see that it does not match their claimed description. Maybe they hit the entrance of Fordow, to delay some things, but Fordow itself cannot be severely damaged. No one even knows if centrifuges were even stored there. New generations of [centrifuges] might not even been installed there at all. When you have built something once before, building it again is just copy pasting it. However, it takes time to rebuild, such as Isfahan nuclear center. I once tried to find out what centrifuge the Americans use, then I realized they are trying to find out what we, Iranian scientists, did to make our centrifuges have, for example, 48 SW output.”

🇺🇸🇮🇷 USA HAS NOT DESTROYED THE NUCLEAR SITE FORDOW? Iranian nuclear scientist, Aghamiri: “The enemy says they destroyed Fordow, but if you go there, you will see that it does not match their claimed description. Maybe they hit the entrance of Fordow, to delay some things, but Fordow itself cannot be severely damaged. No one even knows if centrifuges were even stored there. New generations of [centrifuges] might not even been installed there at all. When you have built something once before, building it again is just copy pasting it. However, it takes time to rebuild, such as Isfahan nuclear center. I once tried to find out what centrifuge the Americans use, then I realized they are trying to find out what we, Iranian scientists, did to make our centrifuges have, for example, 48 SW output.”

Lord Bebo

22,038 views • 9 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump says getting the uranium back is a red line, then admits nobody knows if it's even recoverable: "People don't even know if you can get it. Every single bomb went down those air shafts. I use the word obliterated." He's demanding something as a dealbreaker that his own bombs may have made impossible to deliver. Iran can't hand over uranium that's buried under a mountain of rubble so deep it needs "the biggest excavators you can imagine." And Trump just confirmed the Atomic Energy Commission agrees it may be beyond reach. So the red line for the deal is retrieving material that might not exist in retrievable form anymore.

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump says getting the uranium back is a red line, then admits nobody knows if it's even recoverable: "People don't even know if you can get it. Every single bomb went down those air shafts. I use the word obliterated." He's demanding something as a dealbreaker that his own bombs may have made impossible to deliver. Iran can't hand over uranium that's buried under a mountain of rubble so deep it needs "the biggest excavators you can imagine." And Trump just confirmed the Atomic Energy Commission agrees it may be beyond reach. So the red line for the deal is retrieving material that might not exist in retrievable form anymore.

Mario Nawfal

292,825 views • 2 months ago

“We searched and searched, but found nothing.” — Lavrov on the IAEA’s demands that Iran disclose the location of its enriched uranium: “Right now, IAEA Director General Grossi is demanding that Iran grant access to its nuclear facilities to verify where the enriched material is located and to inspect the situation overall. But are there any guarantees that this information won’t leak? I don’t see any such guarantees. It’s like saying, ‘We searched and searched, found nothing — you must have hidden it somewhere, now show us where.’ And this is coming from the head of a respected agency.”

“We searched and searched, but found nothing.” — Lavrov on the IAEA’s demands that Iran disclose the location of its enriched uranium: “Right now, IAEA Director General Grossi is demanding that Iran grant access to its nuclear facilities to verify where the enriched material is located and to inspect the situation overall. But are there any guarantees that this information won’t leak? I don’t see any such guarantees. It’s like saying, ‘We searched and searched, found nothing — you must have hidden it somewhere, now show us where.’ And this is coming from the head of a respected agency.”

Zlatti71

198,504 views • 1 year ago

Professor Robert Pape: Now Iran is more powerful, not weaker. It’s going to want more. It will want to keep the 3.5 percent enriched uranium. I’ve modeled the bombing of Iran for 20 years. The United States would bomb Fordo and Natanz because Israel does not have the airpower to take out Fordo. So we take out Fordo. When we do, we disable the industrial facility — but we don’t get the nuclear material. Even though President Trump declared the program obliterated, he began negotiating again. Why? Because of the nuclear material. My analysis has always been that about a year later, you would panic over that dispersed material. You would never truly know whether it was being turned into a nuclear weapon or a radiological device. And then you would move toward regime change. Bombing for regime change was always stage two. I said this is how America would talk itself into a regime change war — something it has resisted for decades. First, you bomb Fordo. That’s exactly what happened. You disable the facility , not the enriched uranium. And it’s always about the enriched uranium.

Professor Robert Pape: Now Iran is more powerful, not weaker. It’s going to want more. It will want to keep the 3.5 percent enriched uranium. I’ve modeled the bombing of Iran for 20 years. The United States would bomb Fordo and Natanz because Israel does not have the airpower to take out Fordo. So we take out Fordo. When we do, we disable the industrial facility — but we don’t get the nuclear material. Even though President Trump declared the program obliterated, he began negotiating again. Why? Because of the nuclear material. My analysis has always been that about a year later, you would panic over that dispersed material. You would never truly know whether it was being turned into a nuclear weapon or a radiological device. And then you would move toward regime change. Bombing for regime change was always stage two. I said this is how America would talk itself into a regime change war — something it has resisted for decades. First, you bomb Fordo. That’s exactly what happened. You disable the facility , not the enriched uranium. And it’s always about the enriched uranium.

Clash Report

53,986 views • 3 months ago

Collins: Some people may say, well, why are we at war with them now if it was obliterated, then? Scott: Well, because they're rebuilding their program because they said they had they they had enriched uranium and because they were building ballistic missile weapons, the missiles and the ability to carry those to the United States.

Collins: Some people may say, well, why are we at war with them now if it was obliterated, then? Scott: Well, because they're rebuilding their program because they said they had they they had enriched uranium and because they were building ballistic missile weapons, the missiles and the ability to carry those to the United States.

Acyn

35,915 views • 3 months ago

🇮🇷| Iranian nuclear scientist, Aghamiri: The enemy says they destroyed Fordow, but if you go there, you will see that it does not match their claimed description. Maybe they hit the entrance of Fordow, to delay some things, but Fordow itself cannot be severely damaged. No one even knows if centrifuges were even stored there. New generations of [centrifuges] might not even been installed there at all. When you have built something once before, building it again is just copy pasting it. However, it takes time to rebuild, such as Isfahan nuclear center. I once tried to find out what centrifuge the Americans use, then I realized they are trying to find out what we, Iranian scientists, did to make our centrifuges have, for example, 48 SW output.

🇮🇷| Iranian nuclear scientist, Aghamiri: The enemy says they destroyed Fordow, but if you go there, you will see that it does not match their claimed description. Maybe they hit the entrance of Fordow, to delay some things, but Fordow itself cannot be severely damaged. No one even knows if centrifuges were even stored there. New generations of [centrifuges] might not even been installed there at all. When you have built something once before, building it again is just copy pasting it. However, it takes time to rebuild, such as Isfahan nuclear center. I once tried to find out what centrifuge the Americans use, then I realized they are trying to find out what we, Iranian scientists, did to make our centrifuges have, for example, 48 SW output.

Arya - آریا

134,636 views • 9 months ago