Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Declassifying this whole 1.5 hour segment from my X subscriber livestream series. From Censorship Industry Annotated #63: Mercenary Media For The State. This covers OCCRP, the USAID-funded hit-piece-for-hire NGO that targeted Rudy Giuliani, Paul Manafort & helped impeach Trump

347,759 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Zaki Solja's profile picture
Zaki Solja1 year ago

The rabbit hole never ends. Each and every day we uncover another new corrupt scandal of the USAID. Thanks Mike

RealWorldInfo's profile picture
RealWorldInfo1 year ago

The media won’t tell you, and woke liberals are clueless: Trump’s roaring comeback is driven by everyday Americans fed up with soaring bills, not obsessed about a dozen genders or the right to a transgender bathroom. #AbookThatChangesEverything #TrumpWon

Tink3rToy's profile picture
Tink3rToy1 year ago

Thanks Mike. Great work, keep it up. Cheers.

🌍Travel_with_me's profile picture
🌍Travel_with_me1 year ago

Going to sleep, tomorrow's lesson

IZNTREAL's profile picture
IZNTREAL1 year ago

And surprise surprise the MSM is eerily silent on all of the fraud

Equihopper 🇺🇸's profile picture
Equihopper 🇺🇸1 year ago

Thank you. Much appreciated.

Anoopa's profile picture
Anoopa1 year ago

The intersection of media, government funding, and political influence is a crucial area of discussion, especially when it involves entities like USAID and the role they play in shaping narratives. Highlighting groups like OCCRP and their impact on major political figures definitely opens up a conversation about transparency, media bias, and the power structures that shape our understanding of events. It’s definitely a subject that many will be eager to hear more about.

BigBall's profile picture
BigBall1 year ago

USAID's environmental programs are crucial for global sustainability. From conservation to climate change initiatives, they've been at the forefront of protecting our planet. Let's not lose this momentum. #EnvironmentalAid #USAID

PWD's profile picture
PWD1 year ago

So much corruption on this project.

Nate Vohwinkle's profile picture
Nate Vohwinkle1 year ago

Mike Love all your work…brilliant! Is there a way to listen to this outside of X? Like a podcast? So I don’t have to have the app open for 1-1/2 hours and can just listen.

Related Videos

“OCCRP’s Work is Not Political,” said the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project last week, apparently in response to our story about its involvement in the 2019 impeachment of President Donald Trump. “OCCRP has recently become the target of a conspiracy theory suggesting that we worked with one of our donors, USAID, to undermine President Donald Trump during his first administration. This is simply untrue, and it’s not how OCCRP operates.” But the allegations in our report, that USAID effectively created and oversees OCCRP, are true. Senior managers at USAID and the co-founder of OCCRP confirmed that USAID must sign off on the hiring of key OCCRP personnel and its annual work plan. OCCRP created a central piece of evidence in a CIA analyst’s whistleblower complaint that resulted in the House of Representatives voting to impeach President Donald Trump in December 2019. OCCRP admits all of this in its response: “Here are the facts: One of our storieswas cited in a 2019 whistleblower complaint filed against President Donald Trump. The complaint then sparked his first impeachment.” OCCRP defended itself against accusations that it was part of a conspiracy. “That story, like all stories we do, was reported without our donors’ knowledge or input. OCCRP had no contact with the whistleblower, and was unaware of the complaint until after it was reported by U.S. domestic media.” In an email to Public, OCCRP’s Editor in Chief noted that OCCRP published an article about how Hunter Biden’s business partner, Devon Archer, “had received millions from a reputed organized crime associate” as evidence that OCCRP has no political bias. But neither we nor any other media outlet claimed that OCCRP had the direct input of USAID for its story, nor that it had any contact with the whistleblower. It’s not clear that such communication would even be needed for USAID and OCCRP to participate in a scheme to develop evidence against Trump for a supposedly impeachable offense. As for OCCRP’s article about Hunter Biden’s business partner, it repeatedly stressed that Hunter Biden was not involved. “While the younger Biden had previously been involved with RSTP [Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners],” OCCRP wrote, “there is no evidence that he played a role in the mbloom [startup fund] deal.” OCCRP went on to say that it had confirmed Biden’s lack of involvement after reviewing “financial records.” It did not specify how it obtained those records. And despite the extensive evidence of influence peddling by the Bidens in countries routinely covered by OCCRP, including Ukraine, the organization does not appear to have thoroughly investigated them. OCCRP describes itself as a cost-effective arm of the US government’s anti-corruption efforts, writing that “our stories have helped return more than $11 billion to public coffers through seizures and fines” and that “OCCRP has brought in at least ten times more money to the U.S. government than it has received in grants.” But if it’s an arm of the US government, it’s one that was weaponized against Trump. A new investigation by Public shows that OCCRP played a significant role in developing the narrative that Trump and his associates had ties to Russian banking and Russian money laundering, as well as other undisclosed conflicts of interest with Russia. Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article!

Michael Shellenberger

125,468 views • 1 year ago