Deepak Chopra schooled by Richard Dawkins

Chopra might have no idea what he’s talking about, but neither does Dawkins.

Richard Dawkins didn’t say anything, other than some fancy word stating, he doesn’t understand.

Deepak is one weird dude. He is also on the Epstein list.

Dawkins did NOT nor has he EVER schooled anybody on anything. He is an absolute lying fool. For the life of me I cannot figure why anyone would listen to one single word of anything he says, unless you like the sound of his accent, or take one syllable from his mouth with any serious consideration. I know children with very little language capability that are much more credible than Dawkins. He is an absolute lying bafoon. Sua Sponte RLTW

Deepak is right here. It is a grey area debate. He does use the word rudimentary. Dawkins is a fuddy duddy whoch has no placenin science

No one got destroyed here your tiny brain can’t understand both are philosophical perspectives and whilst they do contradict each other they don’t actually compete, both have evidence. Deepak made a fantastic claim that atoms is a fundamental element of consciousness. Or Dawkins perspective which is conscious as an emergent element of biology as opposed to large frame work. There’s actually heaps of evidence for both @grok verify

Richard Dawkins is an idiots smart man.

Dawkins has become a horrible person though.

Imagine this, by the size of the earth to the universe we are not conscious just as the size of cell to us. Chopra is right .

Atheists are literally people who are so smart they become dumb.

Deepak is an epstein-crew. He designed sound smart and push 💩.

I'm with Deepak. It is obvious the universe has awareness, that cells have awareness.

Dawkins is a modern day of Satan! He knows he is going to hell so he is dragging everyone with him!

A single cell most definitely has consciousness as any good epigeneticist will tell you. Look up Dr Bruce Lipton who has technically rewrote the book on cellular biology. DawkinsFail

Define consciousness

Science slop

Deepak Chopra has passed his use-by date.

You realise Dawkins bases his whole idea off darwinism. He cant see outside the box. You need to ask him the breakfast question.

Sure sure 👍

Looks like the other way around

wtf is muscle "memory" then, crap? Dawkins is a corn.

Deepak is correct, even if he can’t articulate it. Atomic configurations are self (p)referential, and thus have a memory represented in the nucleus. Consciousness is a wave function that begins at atomic confinement.

Ese Dawkins no dice nada, pura palabrería barata.

Deepak has been spending too much time in X spaces lol

Dawkins is not Smart Chopra is better here You are of an insane mindset

@grok maybe I’m crazy but it doesn’t come across as Richard Dawkins “schooled” deepak. Whether you view cells as concious intrinsically depends on what is your threshold for conscious begins with. In that context, deepak could be correct that cells are concious.

Yeah, Deepak Chopra has some wacky ideas. There is just enough flexibility in his imprecise word use that it is difficult to show this, unfortunately.

We're they discussing Feynman Diagrams? If so this is what AI suggests

Richard is a blond ignorant. Or an infiltered

Deepak Chopra is straight up a fraud.

DAWKINGS ..YOU CAN SAY THAT ABOUT A ROCK, BUT IF ATOMS ARE MOVING, THEIR ALIVE, IN SOME WAY, THERES SOMTHING LIVING BECAUSE IF YOU LEAVE IT ALONE IT STRATS GROWING. ITS ALIVE!! ✋️👏👏👏👏🤣🤣🤣🤣

Richard Dawkins believes that matter and mind are ontologically separate This assumption leads directly to the Hard Problem People like Dawkins assert the Hard Problem as though it is a problem in anything other than their own presuppositions. Their own *faith*