Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

DeepSeek R1 has landed on Cursor Composer, so I tried it by adding Supabase realtime to my app! If you're wondering, they are using a version of DeepSeek hosted on US servers. As much as I love the hype on this model, I find that using Claude Sonnet produces...

98,463 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля pgflow
pgflow1 год назад

Yeah Sonnet is still way ahead in terms of coding! But reasoning traces from R1 can be used in other models (feature), and that's exactly what guys from DeepClaude did - they use R1 to create a reasoning trace and then use it to improve output from Sonnet - mindblowing!

Фото профиля Study Bunny Games
Study Bunny Games2 лет назад

Learn Japanese through "mild immersion" in a game Like this? Repost and follow us!

Фото профиля Tyler Hughes
Tyler Hughes1 год назад

Personally I think where things are going to really benefit from Deepseek is when people decide to use it for reasoning only and then pass that reasoning to Claude to implement

Фото профиля Daniel
Daniel1 год назад

Use R1 to create a plan for working on a feature. Have it break that down into chunks it can assign to jr developers. Then feed that plan into Composer using Claude 3.5. Works really well. R1 is the architect, Claude is the Staff engineer

Фото профиля Lucas Dickey
Lucas Dickey1 год назад

I'd like it in Cursor if I could use R1 offline when I can't use Sonnet (like the flight I'm imminently departing on where the Wi-Fi is broken)... PS I thought it was funny when @cursor_ai announced R1 support, but said that they're still leaving Sonnet as default due to better performance

Фото профиля John George
John George1 год назад

You're using it wrong. You should use R1 in chat mode to analyze a problem and provide step-by-step instructions, then copy the entire output (including the thinking) over to the agent composer with Claude 3.5 Sonnet. I've found the results astonishing.

Фото профиля Joshua Riley
Joshua Riley1 год назад

Have you seen that you can now create and manage Supabase projects now with Cursor Composer thanks to MCP support? That’s the game changing feature for me

Фото профиля Adam Hearn
Adam Hearn1 год назад

DeepSeek R1 is slow, inaccurate, and often confusing itself. Buying more $NVDA everyday!

Фото профиля Pedro Santos
Pedro Santos1 год назад

@supabase Agreed , 5 days of testing, and I still don’t get the hype.

Фото профиля AllYourTech
AllYourTech1 год назад

@supabase Yep, I’ve still yet to find a model that outperforms Claude despite what benchmarks may have us believe

Фото профиля Shota Azikuri
Shota Azikuri1 год назад

it's amazing that still no model can beat sonnet

Похожие видео

DeepSeek allegedly beat ChatGPT. So should we all switch? Here's a comparison for academics: 👇 The prompt: 🎯 I asked a fairly complicated question on how to analyze my data collection to gain novel ecological insights and for references to similar papers for each suggestion. Here are the results: 1️⃣ Content: - DeepSeek provided deeper, shorter replies that I perceived as more creative. - ChatGPT played it safe and gave me slightly more obvious solutions 2️⃣ Hallucinations: - DeepSeek found 40+ search results and each cited paper had a link attached. No hallucinations. - ChatGPT hallucinated 2 out of 7 papers. 3️⃣ Speed: - DeepSeek (free version) was many times slower and often didn't reply due to server overload 4️⃣ Customizability: - ChatGPT's replies are much more customisable. By using "Custom Instructions" you can vary the length and include more or less formulae. 5️⃣ Length: - ChatGPT generally gave much longer and more detailed replies. 5️⃣ Guidance: - ChatGPT created a 4-step plan on using my data, which made sense but was quite vague on implementation topics. - DeepSeek gave me links to the coding packages I should be using, which was very helpful. 🤔 My 2 cents If you're a premium subscriber to ChatGPT, keep using it - the results are very similar and can be fine-tuned. Keep an eye out DeepSeek, as it is much more efficient (~10x cheaper under the hood), it might produce more impressive models later on.

Ilya Shabanov

38,452 просмотров • 1 год назад

U.S. Navy Bans DeepSeek Over 'Security Concerns' As 'Substantial' Evidence Emerges Chinese AI Ripped Off ChatGPT | ZeroHedge The U.S. Navy has instructed service members to avoid using the Chinese AI platform DeepSeek, citing "potential security and ethical concerns," according to CNBC. An email sent to "shipmates" in recent days, confirmed by CNBC on Tuesday, referenced the Navy's AI policy and emphasized the importance of refraining from using DeepSeek. The memo warned service members against using the platform "for any work-related tasks or personal use" and instructed them to "avoid downloading, installing, or using the DeepSeek model in any capacity." The warning follows the recent rise of DeepSeek’s R1 model, which has garnered significant attention worldwide, particularly within the U.S. business and technology sectors. The R1 model has demonstrated capabilities comparable to OpenAI’s models. In December, DeepSeek claimed it had successfully trained a large language model in just two months at a cost of $6 million—a figure disputed by technologists—despite U.S. restrictions on semiconductor chip exports to China. The R1, an open-source model, surged to the top of Apple’s app store rankings this week, triggering a market sell-off. Shares of AI chipmakers Nvidia and Broadcom plummeted by 17% on Monday, wiping out a combined $800 billion in market value. Nvidia has since recovered some of its losses. On Monday, DeepSeek announced a temporary restriction on user registrations, citing "large-scale malicious attacks" on its services, before later restoring normal operations. DeepSeek’s advancements have challenged the long-held belief that the U.S. was significantly ahead of China in AI development. Asked how R1 caught up to ChatGPT, AI and Crypto Czar David Sacks suggested that DeepSeek may have leveraged a technique known as "distillation" to train its model using OpenAI’s technology. “There’s a technique in AI called distillation, which you’re going to hear a lot about. It’s when one model learns from another model,” Sacks explained to Fox News. “Effectively, the student model asks the parent model millions of questions, mimicking the reasoning process and absorbing knowledge.” “They can essentially extract the knowledge out of the model,” he continued. “There’s substantial evidence that what DeepSeek did here was distill knowledge from OpenAI’s models.” “I don’t think OpenAI is too happy about this,” Sacks added. President Donald Trump has said that DeepSeek “should be a wake-up call” for U.S. tech companies. “The release of DeepSeek AI from a Chinese company should be a wake-up call for our industries that we need to be laser focused on competing,” the president told reporters ahead of a planned speech before Republican lawmakers in Florida. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

75,351 просмотров • 1 год назад