Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

DeepSeek R1 has landed on Cursor Composer, so I tried it by adding Supabase realtime to my app! If you're wondering, they are using a version of DeepSeek hosted on US servers. As much as I love the hype on this model, I find that using Claude Sonnet produces...

98,463 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля pgflow
pgflow1 год назад

Yeah Sonnet is still way ahead in terms of coding! But reasoning traces from R1 can be used in other models (feature), and that's exactly what guys from DeepClaude did - they use R1 to create a reasoning trace and then use it to improve output from Sonnet - mindblowing!

Фото профиля Study Bunny Games
Study Bunny Games2 лет назад

Learn Japanese through "mild immersion" in a game Like this? Repost and follow us!

Фото профиля Tyler Hughes
Tyler Hughes1 год назад

Personally I think where things are going to really benefit from Deepseek is when people decide to use it for reasoning only and then pass that reasoning to Claude to implement

Фото профиля Daniel
Daniel1 год назад

Use R1 to create a plan for working on a feature. Have it break that down into chunks it can assign to jr developers. Then feed that plan into Composer using Claude 3.5. Works really well. R1 is the architect, Claude is the Staff engineer

Фото профиля Lucas Dickey
Lucas Dickey1 год назад

I'd like it in Cursor if I could use R1 offline when I can't use Sonnet (like the flight I'm imminently departing on where the Wi-Fi is broken)... PS I thought it was funny when @cursor_ai announced R1 support, but said that they're still leaving Sonnet as default due to better performance

Фото профиля John George
John George1 год назад

You're using it wrong. You should use R1 in chat mode to analyze a problem and provide step-by-step instructions, then copy the entire output (including the thinking) over to the agent composer with Claude 3.5 Sonnet. I've found the results astonishing.

Фото профиля Joshua Riley
Joshua Riley1 год назад

Have you seen that you can now create and manage Supabase projects now with Cursor Composer thanks to MCP support? That’s the game changing feature for me

Фото профиля Adam Hearn
Adam Hearn1 год назад

DeepSeek R1 is slow, inaccurate, and often confusing itself. Buying more $NVDA everyday!

Фото профиля Pedro Santos
Pedro Santos1 год назад

@supabase Agreed , 5 days of testing, and I still don’t get the hype.

Фото профиля AllYourTech
AllYourTech1 год назад

@supabase Yep, I’ve still yet to find a model that outperforms Claude despite what benchmarks may have us believe

Фото профиля Shota Azikuri
Shota Azikuri1 год назад

it's amazing that still no model can beat sonnet

Похожие видео

DeepSeek allegedly beat ChatGPT. So should we all switch? Here's a comparison for academics: 👇 The prompt: 🎯 I asked a fairly complicated question on how to analyze my data collection to gain novel ecological insights and for references to similar papers for each suggestion. Here are the results: 1️⃣ Content: - DeepSeek provided deeper, shorter replies that I perceived as more creative. - ChatGPT played it safe and gave me slightly more obvious solutions 2️⃣ Hallucinations: - DeepSeek found 40+ search results and each cited paper had a link attached. No hallucinations. - ChatGPT hallucinated 2 out of 7 papers. 3️⃣ Speed: - DeepSeek (free version) was many times slower and often didn't reply due to server overload 4️⃣ Customizability: - ChatGPT's replies are much more customisable. By using "Custom Instructions" you can vary the length and include more or less formulae. 5️⃣ Length: - ChatGPT generally gave much longer and more detailed replies. 5️⃣ Guidance: - ChatGPT created a 4-step plan on using my data, which made sense but was quite vague on implementation topics. - DeepSeek gave me links to the coding packages I should be using, which was very helpful. 🤔 My 2 cents If you're a premium subscriber to ChatGPT, keep using it - the results are very similar and can be fine-tuned. Keep an eye out DeepSeek, as it is much more efficient (~10x cheaper under the hood), it might produce more impressive models later on.

Ilya Shabanov

38,452 просмотров • 1 год назад