Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

DeepSeek V4 Flash & V4 Pro Official API Speed Test V4 Flash: 80.63 tok/s V4 Pro: 36.72 tok/s

stevibe's profile picture

stevibe

22,885 subscribers

17,555 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

DeepSeek V4 Flash running on the DGX Station.
0:37

DeepSeek V4 Flash running on the DGX Station.

Matthew Berman

70,555 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs V4 Pro, 4 canvas tests run. I'm a dev, and honestly DeepSeek was never on my list for coding tasks. After seeing these results, I might need to reconsider. 🌳 Tree: Flash actually beat Pro: denser canopy, better leaf distribution 🌌 Night sky: Pro wins, shooting stars, constellations, Milky Way band all there 🐟 Fish boids: Pro is stunning: proper caustics, tight schooling, real underwater feel 🏠 House builder: first model we've tested that knows how to actually build a rooftop DeepSeek coding might be underrated.
0:42

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs V4 Pro, 4 canvas tests run. I'm a dev, and honestly DeepSeek was never on my list for coding tasks. After seeing these results, I might need to reconsider. 🌳 Tree: Flash actually beat Pro: denser canopy, better leaf distribution 🌌 Night sky: Pro wins, shooting stars, constellations, Milky Way band all there 🐟 Fish boids: Pro is stunning: proper caustics, tight schooling, real underwater feel 🏠 House builder: first model we've tested that knows how to actually build a rooftop DeepSeek coding might be underrated.

stevibe

56,270 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Xiaomi MIMO V2.5 Pro MIMO V2.5-Pro wins by: 1. ~1 min faster than DeepSeek-V4-Pro 2. cleaner aesthetic Our reasoning: MIMO V2.5 Pro is natively multimodal, so it has a stronger sense of what good visuals look like. Curious to see how DeepSeek V4 Vision will change that
0:35

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Xiaomi MIMO V2.5 Pro MIMO V2.5-Pro wins by: 1. ~1 min faster than DeepSeek-V4-Pro 2. cleaner aesthetic Our reasoning: MIMO V2.5 Pro is natively multimodal, so it has a stronger sense of what good visuals look like. Curious to see how DeepSeek V4 Vision will change that

GMI Cloud

40,379 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Here's DeepSeek v4 Pro. Added to the playable gallery as well.
0:20

Here's DeepSeek v4 Pro. Added to the playable gallery as well.

Ethan Mollick

39,375 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

DeepSeek v4 in API? So fucking fast 🤯 Ascend or Nvidia?
0:30

DeepSeek v4 in API? So fucking fast 🤯 Ascend or Nvidia?

Broooooklyn

97,841 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Unboxing Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro🖱！
0:50

Unboxing Razer DeathAdder V4 Pro🖱！

Edward Gaming

14,979 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Just asked DeepSeek V4 Pro to generate a macOS clone... and uh... it tried. Mid.
0:50

Just asked DeepSeek V4 Pro to generate a macOS clone... and uh... it tried. Mid.

WorldofAI

50,772 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

FREE DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4 Flash API. Runtime by Bad Theory Labs just dropped it. Same platform, new free model, same 2-minute setup. > Runtime already gave you free Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 access. Now they added DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4 Flash to the free tier. Absolutely FREE, YES. Same exact flow as before: → Go to runtime(.)badtheorylabs(.)com → Sign up with Google → Fill in your details during onboarding → Free balance lands automatically(But you don't need it to use DeepSeek - it's completely free right now) → Grab your API key from the dashboard → Plug into OpenCode, OpenClaw, or Hermes - done DeepSeek V4 Pro is one of the strongest coding and reasoning models available right now. Free tier also includes btl-2 - auto-routes between GLM, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemma. 10 million tokens per month at zero cost. 344 models total. One OpenAI-compatible endpoint. No code rebuild, no card, no limits hunting. >> Just start using the API, and when choosing a provider, select DeepSeek I tested it myself - fully working. Bookmark this before the free tier fills up.
0:23

FREE DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4 Flash API. Runtime by Bad Theory Labs just dropped it. Same platform, new free model, same 2-minute setup. > Runtime already gave you free Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 access. Now they added DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4 Flash to the free tier. Absolutely FREE, YES. Same exact flow as before: → Go to runtime(.)badtheorylabs(.)com → Sign up with Google → Fill in your details during onboarding → Free balance lands automatically(But you don't need it to use DeepSeek - it's completely free right now) → Grab your API key from the dashboard → Plug into OpenCode, OpenClaw, or Hermes - done DeepSeek V4 Pro is one of the strongest coding and reasoning models available right now. Free tier also includes btl-2 - auto-routes between GLM, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemma. 10 million tokens per month at zero cost. 344 models total. One OpenAI-compatible endpoint. No code rebuild, no card, no limits hunting. >> Just start using the API, and when choosing a provider, select DeepSeek I tested it myself - fully working. Bookmark this before the free tier fills up.

Atenov int.

26,920 просмотров • 19 дней назад

DeepSeek v4 PRO running via SSD streaming on my 128GB MacBook m5 max. 1.6 trillion parameters.
4:15

DeepSeek v4 PRO running via SSD streaming on my 128GB MacBook m5 max. 1.6 trillion parameters.

antirez

269,779 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

두카티 파니갈레 V4 S 궁금해서 찾아봄
0:42

두카티 파니갈레 V4 S 궁금해서 찾아봄

김무원

103,378 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ZenMux 福利来了，限时免费供应 deepseek-v4-pro 我刚刚并发了两个任务感觉速度还可以，大家抓紧薅起来 体验id：deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-free 免费体验及配置地址见： 视频、图四是刚刚用deepseek v4 开发的，供君参考 最后： 如果你想试试 DeepSeek V4，可以用这个链接：
0:29

ZenMux 福利来了，限时免费供应 deepseek-v4-pro 我刚刚并发了两个任务感觉速度还可以，大家抓紧薅起来 体验id：deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-free 免费体验及配置地址见： 视频、图四是刚刚用deepseek v4 开发的，供君参考 最后： 如果你想试试 DeepSeek V4，可以用这个链接：

岚叔

93,195 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I didn't expect DeepSeek v4 PRO (not Flash) to run well on the Mac Studio M3 Ultra with 512GB of RAM. This is 2 bit quantized with the same DwarfStar recipe used for Flash. 433GB GGUF file. 130 t/s prefill, 13 t/s generation. Prefill in the video is low because small prompt.
1:24

I didn't expect DeepSeek v4 PRO (not Flash) to run well on the Mac Studio M3 Ultra with 512GB of RAM. This is 2 bit quantized with the same DwarfStar recipe used for Flash. 433GB GGUF file. 130 t/s prefill, 13 t/s generation. Prefill in the video is low because small prompt.

antirez

169,759 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I'm now used to this speed 🤣 Running DeepSeek-V4-Flash-IQ2XXS on my single 3090 and 64GB RAM tg is fine, its the prefill that actually hurts.
1:04

I'm now used to this speed 🤣 Running DeepSeek-V4-Flash-IQ2XXS on my single 3090 and 64GB RAM tg is fine, its the prefill that actually hurts.

AJ

20,999 просмотров • 10 дней назад

DeepSeek V4 Flash 5毛钱就可以免费下载高清电影，吊打GPT-5.5
1:36

DeepSeek V4 Flash 5毛钱就可以免费下载高清电影，吊打GPT-5.5

Andy Stewart

58,050 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A 3B model just cleared a puzzle that a 1.6 TRILLION param model couldn't. You've seen this benchmark before: my sliding-puzzle test. Same Kimi & DeepSeek runs as last time. The only new thing: I dropped VibeThinker-3B in for a side-by-side. > VibeThinker → 3B > DeepSeek V4 Flash → 284B > Kimi K2.6 → 1T > DeepSeek V4 Pro → 1.6T Shuffle depths 5, 10, 12, 15, 18, 22. One wrong move scrambles the whole board, so it's pure long-chain reasoning. ✅ VibeThinker-3B: solved all six. Never lost the thread. ⚠️ The giants started cracking at depth 15: Flash, Pro, and even Kimi each blew a run, scrambling the board past the move cap. As VibeThinker was not trained for tool calling, I had it emit X and ran the move. Bigger generalist ≠ smarter.
0:48

A 3B model just cleared a puzzle that a 1.6 TRILLION param model couldn't. You've seen this benchmark before: my sliding-puzzle test. Same Kimi & DeepSeek runs as last time. The only new thing: I dropped VibeThinker-3B in for a side-by-side. > VibeThinker → 3B > DeepSeek V4 Flash → 284B > Kimi K2.6 → 1T > DeepSeek V4 Pro → 1.6T Shuffle depths 5, 10, 12, 15, 18, 22. One wrong move scrambles the whole board, so it's pure long-chain reasoning. ✅ VibeThinker-3B: solved all six. Never lost the thread. ⚠️ The giants started cracking at depth 15: Flash, Pro, and even Kimi each blew a run, scrambling the board past the move cap. As VibeThinker was not trained for tool calling, I had it emit X and ran the move. Bigger generalist ≠ smarter.

stevibe

32,215 просмотров • 17 дней назад

Initial DeepSeek v4 and v4 Flash support added to anemll-flash-llama.cpp! 🚀 M5 MAX 128GB can run full DeepSeek-V4 with 1.6T params in original FP8/FP4 weights from SSD without requantization! One-click scripts to convert HF safetensors to dense + MoE sidecar (no GGUF needed) Inference and server examples Prefill and decoding benchmarks Branch and docs here: This is WIP and I plan to add cleanup and more testing this week. Feedback welcome!
0:21

Initial DeepSeek v4 and v4 Flash support added to anemll-flash-llama.cpp! 🚀 M5 MAX 128GB can run full DeepSeek-V4 with 1.6T params in original FP8/FP4 weights from SSD without requantization! One-click scripts to convert HF safetensors to dense + MoE sidecar (no GGUF needed) Inference and server examples Prefill and decoding benchmarks Branch and docs here: This is WIP and I plan to add cleanup and more testing this week. Feedback welcome!

Anemll

32,085 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Just $0.3 per day for DeepSeek V4 API, far cheaper than mainstream services with steady quality
0:24

Just $0.3 per day for DeepSeek V4 API, far cheaper than mainstream services with steady quality

BytePlus

193,599 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

4×5090 lost badly in my last Ollama test But with vLLM + Nemotron 3 Super NVFP4, it came back swinging. 4×5090 - TTFT: 0.281s - Prompt eval: 608 tok/s - Generate eval: 110 tok/s PRO 6000 - TTFT: 0.123s - Prompt eval: 1390 tok/s - Generate eval: 81 tok/s So who wins? - PRO 6000 is still faster to respond - But 4×5090 now wins on raw generation speed
0:36

4×5090 lost badly in my last Ollama test But with vLLM + Nemotron 3 Super NVFP4, it came back swinging. 4×5090 - TTFT: 0.281s - Prompt eval: 608 tok/s - Generate eval: 110 tok/s PRO 6000 - TTFT: 0.123s - Prompt eval: 1390 tok/s - Generate eval: 81 tok/s So who wins? - PRO 6000 is still faster to respond - But 4×5090 now wins on raw generation speed

stevibe

16,974 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Want to give v4 a test drive? 🚀 Available now on iOS, and Android. Make more free v4 songs today.
0:27

Want to give v4 a test drive? 🚀 Available now on iOS, and Android. Make more free v4 songs today.

Suno

20,567 просмотров • 1 год назад

Unboxing the Supreme®/Ducati® Streetfighter V4 S 💥
0:56

Unboxing the Supreme®/Ducati® Streetfighter V4 S 💥

DropsByJay

52,644 просмотров • 1 год назад