Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

DeepSeek v4 Pro just built this entire design for $0.0005. - Same prompt, same harness, ran against Fable 5 - DeepSeek needed the right taste layer to compete - Fable 5 just needed a precise prompt Open source keeps closing the gap on price.

RoundtableSpace's profile picture

0xMarioNawfal

256,706 subscribers

59,414 просмотров • 17 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Same game. Three models. UX test, not just UI. DeepSeek: $0.0008. GLM 5.2: $0.048. Fable 5: $0.42. Open source won on both design and price. Fable 5 just lost a UX battle to a model 500x cheaper.
0:19

Same game. Three models. UX test, not just UI. DeepSeek: $0.0008. GLM 5.2: $0.048. Fable 5: $0.42. Open source won on both design and price. Fable 5 just lost a UX battle to a model 500x cheaper.

0xMarioNawfal

75,455 просмотров • 5 дней назад

The Fable 5 briefing site was just the first one. We used Claude Fable 5 in Open Design to generate polished websites across styles. Landing pages, product pages, editorials, launch pages — prompt-built and ready to remix. Watch Fable 5 build in Open Design ↓
0:16

The Fable 5 briefing site was just the first one. We used Claude Fable 5 in Open Design to generate polished websites across styles. Landing pages, product pages, editorials, launch pages — prompt-built and ready to remix. Watch Fable 5 build in Open Design ↓

Open Design

18,460 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Flappy Bird w/ DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2 vs Fable 5 I ran a small experiment: same game, same prompt, three different models. Test setup was simple: /𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚗 in Command Code. The thing I cared about was not UI. UI is now relatively easy for models to imitate. I cared more about UX: whether the model understands the interaction, the flow, the hierarchy, the little product decisions that make something feel usable. 𝙲𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚜: 𝙳𝚎𝚎𝚙𝚂𝚎𝚎𝚔 𝚟𝟺 𝙿𝚛𝚘: $𝟶.𝟶𝟶𝟶𝟾 𝙶𝙻𝙼 𝟻.𝟸: $𝟶.𝟶𝟺𝟾 𝙵𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝟻: $𝟶.𝟺𝟸 The surprising result was that Fable 5 did not produce a meaningfully better UX. It was good, but not good enough to justify the pricing delta for this kind of design task. Open-source models are getting very interesting here. They are much cheaper, competitive on UI, and increasingly good enough on UX. The gap is closing fast.
0:19

Flappy Bird w/ DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2 vs Fable 5 I ran a small experiment: same game, same prompt, three different models. Test setup was simple: /𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚗 in Command Code. The thing I cared about was not UI. UI is now relatively easy for models to imitate. I cared more about UX: whether the model understands the interaction, the flow, the hierarchy, the little product decisions that make something feel usable. 𝙲𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚜: 𝙳𝚎𝚎𝚙𝚂𝚎𝚎𝚔 𝚟𝟺 𝙿𝚛𝚘: $𝟶.𝟶𝟶𝟶𝟾 𝙶𝙻𝙼 𝟻.𝟸: $𝟶.𝟶𝟺𝟾 𝙵𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝟻: $𝟶.𝟺𝟸 The surprising result was that Fable 5 did not produce a meaningfully better UX. It was good, but not good enough to justify the pricing delta for this kind of design task. Open-source models are getting very interesting here. They are much cheaper, competitive on UI, and increasingly good enough on UX. The gap is closing fast.

Ahmad Awais

26,661 просмотров • 13 дней назад

OPEN SOURCE IS REALLY WINNING THIS TIME ran the same prompt on Claude Design and Kimi K2.6 here're the outputs and Kimi on the right is 7x cheaper and 100% open source... see prompt in the comments👇
0:18

OPEN SOURCE IS REALLY WINNING THIS TIME ran the same prompt on Claude Design and Kimi K2.6 here're the outputs and Kimi on the right is 7x cheaper and 100% open source... see prompt in the comments👇

Hasan

101,616 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Say what you will about Anthropic, but Fable is pretty amazing at 3D design. Fed both the same Minecraft prompt (with a Minecraft skill) and got this for Fable:
0:15

Say what you will about Anthropic, but Fable is pretty amazing at 3D design. Fed both the same Minecraft prompt (with a Minecraft skill) and got this for Fable:

Matt Zhou

48,404 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

imagine telling your friends: "give me 10 minutes." then coming back with a multiplayer game built just for them. yeah... we're here now Fable 5 via Higgsfield MCP is making prompt-to-game a reality. 5 wild examples:
0:15

imagine telling your friends: "give me 10 minutes." then coming back with a multiplayer game built just for them. yeah... we're here now Fable 5 via Higgsfield MCP is making prompt-to-game a reality. 5 wild examples:

Angry Tom

31,515 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Happy Friday! We just put DeepSeek-V4-Pro up on It’s the world’s largest open source model at 1.6T parameters, and you can run it for free running on NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs. Try the NVIDIA NIM API →
0:18

Happy Friday! We just put DeepSeek-V4-Pro up on It’s the world’s largest open source model at 1.6T parameters, and you can run it for free running on NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs. Try the NVIDIA NIM API →

NVIDIA AI

204,259 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this
0:16

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this

Fokki

72,175 просмотров • 16 дней назад

ANTHROPIC JUST DROPPED THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO PROMPTING FABLE 5. This is the most important prompting framework I've seen. Bookmark this before you forget. Most people treat Fable 5 like a chatbot. That's the mistake. > don't over-engineer prompts — it degrades output. > use /loop for autonomous multi-step work. > give it the goal, not step-by-step commands. > add a memory file. it learns from past runs. > spin up 50+ subagents for complex tasks. Fable 5 isn't an assistant. it's a consultant that leads the work. Read it before you write another prompt. Claude → Fable 5 → Autonomous Work → Real Output → Money
0:11

ANTHROPIC JUST DROPPED THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO PROMPTING FABLE 5. This is the most important prompting framework I've seen. Bookmark this before you forget. Most people treat Fable 5 like a chatbot. That's the mistake. > don't over-engineer prompts — it degrades output. > use /loop for autonomous multi-step work. > give it the goal, not step-by-step commands. > add a memory file. it learns from past runs. > spin up 50+ subagents for complex tasks. Fable 5 isn't an assistant. it's a consultant that leads the work. Read it before you write another prompt. Claude → Fable 5 → Autonomous Work → Real Output → Money

Kirill

412,127 просмотров • 19 дней назад

just sent my first prompt to Fable 5 > it instantly routed the task to Opus 4.8 > which spawned Sonnet 5 sub agents > that burned 30% of my weekly limit > and handed me slop this thing used to build full open words and refactor entire codebases in one shot WHAT DID YOU DO ANTHROPIC
0:16

just sent my first prompt to Fable 5 > it instantly routed the task to Opus 4.8 > which spawned Sonnet 5 sub agents > that burned 30% of my weekly limit > and handed me slop this thing used to build full open words and refactor entire codebases in one shot WHAT DID YOU DO ANTHROPIC

Machina

544,461 просмотров • 18 дней назад

🚨 JUST IN: THE US GOVERNMENT JUST SHUT DOWN CLAUDE FABLE 5 FOR THE ENTIRE WORLD > a national security export control directive. effective immediately > every foreign national on earth - including Anthropic's own engineers who built the model - is now locked out > Fable 5 launched 4 days ago > it's already being classified like a weapons system > Anthropic says it's a misunderstanding > the order doesn't care > Opus 4.8 still runs. Fable 5 and Mythos 5 are gone until further notice AI just got its first export control. it won't be the last
0:11

🚨 JUST IN: THE US GOVERNMENT JUST SHUT DOWN CLAUDE FABLE 5 FOR THE ENTIRE WORLD > a national security export control directive. effective immediately > every foreign national on earth - including Anthropic's own engineers who built the model - is now locked out > Fable 5 launched 4 days ago > it's already being classified like a weapons system > Anthropic says it's a misunderstanding > the order doesn't care > Opus 4.8 still runs. Fable 5 and Mythos 5 are gone until further notice AI just got its first export control. it won't be the last

Mr. Buzzoni

51,235 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Claude Fable 5 + Claude Design is f*cking insane 🤯 Anthropic just dropped its most intelligent model ever, and the first thing I pointed it at was email design. I built a complete email campaign design in Claude Design, and the difference is night and day: tighter layouts, cleaner hierarchy, on-brand from the first generation. All inside Claude Design with Fable 5. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still paying email agencies $3-5K/month for campaign designs that take 2 weeks to ship. If your campaign calendar is packed but every new email means briefing a designer, waiting on mockups, sending notes, and waiting again... This workflow eliminates the entire bottleneck: → Load your brand design system into Claude Design once (colors, fonts, logo, button styling) → Switch the model to Claude Fable 5 — Anthropic's new state-of-the-art model with the best vision of any AI → Prompt the campaign email section by section: header, hero, headline, offer block, CTA → Fable 5 nails layout and brand details that older models fumbled → Iterate inline — swap images, adjust styling, color-pick directly in the canvas → Export the finished email and hand off to your ESP No briefing a designer. No 2-week turnaround on a single campaign. No paying an agency $4K/month for 4 emails. What you get: → Campaign emails designed in minutes, not weeks → A reusable design system every new email pulls from automatically → Noticeably smarter design decisions from Fable 5's upgraded vision → Full inline editing before anything touches your ESP Built 100% with Claude Design + Claude Fable 5. I recorded a full walkthrough showing exactly how this works. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "FABLE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:17

Claude Fable 5 + Claude Design is f*cking insane 🤯 Anthropic just dropped its most intelligent model ever, and the first thing I pointed it at was email design. I built a complete email campaign design in Claude Design, and the difference is night and day: tighter layouts, cleaner hierarchy, on-brand from the first generation. All inside Claude Design with Fable 5. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still paying email agencies $3-5K/month for campaign designs that take 2 weeks to ship. If your campaign calendar is packed but every new email means briefing a designer, waiting on mockups, sending notes, and waiting again... This workflow eliminates the entire bottleneck: → Load your brand design system into Claude Design once (colors, fonts, logo, button styling) → Switch the model to Claude Fable 5 — Anthropic's new state-of-the-art model with the best vision of any AI → Prompt the campaign email section by section: header, hero, headline, offer block, CTA → Fable 5 nails layout and brand details that older models fumbled → Iterate inline — swap images, adjust styling, color-pick directly in the canvas → Export the finished email and hand off to your ESP No briefing a designer. No 2-week turnaround on a single campaign. No paying an agency $4K/month for 4 emails. What you get: → Campaign emails designed in minutes, not weeks → A reusable design system every new email pulls from automatically → Noticeably smarter design decisions from Fable 5's upgraded vision → Full inline editing before anything touches your ESP Built 100% with Claude Design + Claude Fable 5. I recorded a full walkthrough showing exactly how this works. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "FABLE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

42,670 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

FABLE 5 JUST RECREATED NEW YORK CITY IN BLENDER. I connected Blender to Fable 5 and in like 20 minutes, it remade the entire cityscape of NYC It started by getting data of the buildings from public sources, THEN began building it (imo this is a smarter move than what Opus 4.8 would've done) So theoretically, this entire build is up to scale too Fable 5, welcome back.
0:18

FABLE 5 JUST RECREATED NEW YORK CITY IN BLENDER. I connected Blender to Fable 5 and in like 20 minutes, it remade the entire cityscape of NYC It started by getting data of the buildings from public sources, THEN began building it (imo this is a smarter move than what Opus 4.8 would've done) So theoretically, this entire build is up to scale too Fable 5, welcome back.

ashen

221,777 просмотров • 19 дней назад

this is honestly insane someone put GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5 head to head — identical JSON prompt, one shot each. the task: generate a full video from scratch. both cleared it first try. Sol just got there sooner. didn't see that coming — Fable 5 was supposed to own long reasoning outright. if you want the full picture of what Fable 5 actually does, I pulled its 10 hidden features straight from the official docs. full breakdown below.
0:15

this is honestly insane someone put GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5 head to head — identical JSON prompt, one shot each. the task: generate a full video from scratch. both cleared it first try. Sol just got there sooner. didn't see that coming — Fable 5 was supposed to own long reasoning outright. if you want the full picture of what Fable 5 actually does, I pulled its 10 hidden features straight from the official docs. full breakdown below.

Kirill

411,288 просмотров • 3 дней назад

We tested a lot of design skills in Codex and other AI agents. They fix the old AI slop. But they often create a new one: the “taste skill look.” - Same premium sections. - Same editorial typography. - Same generated-design smell. Open Design does not rely on one taste prompt. It combines skills, systems, critique loops, and local harnesses to make AI pages feel less generated and more designed. This page was generated directly in Open Design.
0:15

We tested a lot of design skills in Codex and other AI agents. They fix the old AI slop. But they often create a new one: the “taste skill look.” - Same premium sections. - Same editorial typography. - Same generated-design smell. Open Design does not rely on one taste prompt. It combines skills, systems, critique loops, and local harnesses to make AI pages feel less generated and more designed. This page was generated directly in Open Design.

Open Design

44,061 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Kimi K2.6 just cooked Claude on design 😭 Same prompt. Completely different output. I asked both to build a cinematic, scroll-driven indie game page. Dark. Editorial. Premium. Here's the exact prompt and what happened 👇
0:17

Kimi K2.6 just cooked Claude on design 😭 Same prompt. Completely different output. I asked both to build a cinematic, scroll-driven indie game page. Dark. Editorial. Premium. Here's the exact prompt and what happened 👇

Muhammad Ayan

161,823 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A playable Fortnite took Epic Games 300 people and 6 years. Claude Fable 5 just built one from several sentences. Many people still don't understand how powerful this model really is. We've already seen it build a Minecraft-style game from a single prompt in the browser. This is the next step: a Fortnite-style shooter. Third-person camera, weapon switching, a pickaxe, health and shield bars, a hotbar, buildings scattered across an open map — even the stylized sunset sky. One prompt started it. From there, it writes the code, runs the prototype, sees what breaks, fixes it, and keeps iterating until the thing is actually playable. What makes this interesting isn't that a game can be built. It's how little input is needed to get the process started. A sentence in. A working game out. The gap between an idea and a playable game is closing faster than most people realize.
0:17

A playable Fortnite took Epic Games 300 people and 6 years. Claude Fable 5 just built one from several sentences. Many people still don't understand how powerful this model really is. We've already seen it build a Minecraft-style game from a single prompt in the browser. This is the next step: a Fortnite-style shooter. Third-person camera, weapon switching, a pickaxe, health and shield bars, a hotbar, buildings scattered across an open map — even the stylized sunset sky. One prompt started it. From there, it writes the code, runs the prototype, sees what breaks, fixes it, and keeps iterating until the thing is actually playable. What makes this interesting isn't that a game can be built. It's how little input is needed to get the process started. A sentence in. A working game out. The gap between an idea and a playable game is closing faster than most people realize.

Rich

50,249 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨Grok 4.20 ( Obsidian) A landing page of cybertruck , this model has some Gemini level frontend ( but it's still in the nascent few more brushes needed ) This was with a proper long prompt ( and I guided the design aesthetic) , want to see gpt 5 pro comparison with this ?
0:17

🚨Grok 4.20 ( Obsidian) A landing page of cybertruck , this model has some Gemini level frontend ( but it's still in the nascent few more brushes needed ) This was with a proper long prompt ( and I guided the design aesthetic) , want to see gpt 5 pro comparison with this ?

Chetaslua

37,606 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Fable 5, first Mythos-class model is live on AI/ML API! We ran a fun test: Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 are generating a 3D Pokemon. Verdict? Fable 5 is brilliant, fast, and rare as Mew… but Opus is still that nice little guy who does great stuff. 💛 Fable 5 Important bits: SOTA on nearly every benchmark, and the lead only grows on longer, complex tasks. • 1M Context • $10 / 1M input • $50 / 1M output Built for: long-horizon agentic coding, big migrations, vision-to-code, deep research.
0:15

Fable 5, first Mythos-class model is live on AI/ML API! We ran a fun test: Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 are generating a 3D Pokemon. Verdict? Fable 5 is brilliant, fast, and rare as Mew… but Opus is still that nice little guy who does great stuff. 💛 Fable 5 Important bits: SOTA on nearly every benchmark, and the lead only grows on longer, complex tasks. • 1M Context • $10 / 1M input • $50 / 1M output Built for: long-horizon agentic coding, big migrations, vision-to-code, deep research.

AI/ML API

560,154 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and colliding mid-air over a canyon — A monster truck crushing a row of parked cars Outputs: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08 Fable 5 did all three scenes at A+. The crashes looked real, things fell and broke the right way, and nothing went through the ground or floated. GPT 5.5 was the closest to Fable. In the Bigfoot show, we think GPT was even a little better. GLM 5.2 did not win any scene, but it was the cheapest by far. Fable is the best pick for quality, but you pay more for it.
0:16

Fable 5 totally crushed our new contest, but it cost 6x more than Opus 4.8! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: — A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water — Two cars jumping off ramps and colliding mid-air over a canyon — A monster truck crushing a row of parked cars Outputs: Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08 Fable 5 did all three scenes at A+. The crashes looked real, things fell and broke the right way, and nothing went through the ground or floated. GPT 5.5 was the closest to Fable. In the Bigfoot show, we think GPT was even a little better. GLM 5.2 did not win any scene, but it was the cheapest by far. Fable is the best pick for quality, but you pay more for it.

atomic.chat

2,833,882 просмотров • 19 дней назад