Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

deepseek v4.1 flash ran all four three.js scenes for $0.15. gemini 3.8 flash needed $1.25 we put the two models on one job: a self-contained html page that renders an animated 3d scene with three.js – a storm at sea, a spiral galaxy, a tornado over farmland, a tesla... coil on a dark table. same prompt - calls until all four scenes were usable #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 6 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 12 - time #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 13m 57s #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 32m 02s - cost #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.15 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – $1.25 observations: • gemini blew out the exposure on 4 of 5 first attempts – a white blob where the tesla coil should be. the prompt had a paragraph on exposure. it did not help. • both models overcorrect in the fix loop: "too bright" becomes "almost black". round two is where it lands. same four scenes, 6 calls and $0.15 against 12 calls and $1.25!show more

thehype.

4,687 subscribers

62,603 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

16 Comments

Addy Crezee | thehype. | /function11 month ago

flash models are so powerful these days, wow. can The physics around the hurricane and the night storm is amazing

thehype.1 month ago

indeed

EL871 month ago

a storm at sea gemini>deepseek a spiral galaxy gemini=deepseek a tornado over farmland gemini>deepseek a tesla coil on a dark table deepseek>gemini

thehype.1 month ago

so noone won 😊

nickster1 month ago

whale is mogging google 🤦🏻‍♂️ hope gemini 4.0 will be the great google’s revenge

thehype.1 month ago

we are waiting 😎

Victoria Neiman1 month ago

i like deepseek

thehype.1 month ago

😉

Foundry1 month ago

nice bench guys! deepseek looks fire fr

thehype.1 month ago

tyty

Maximum_health1 month ago

That’s wild Deepseek was cooking too For under 2 bucks you could get the best of both and combine them

thehype.1 month ago

yes 😎

Jake – 🇺🇸/acc1 month ago

on the numbers deepseek looks better but in these outputs I'd argue gemini is significantly better

thehype.1 month ago

both models showed great results tbh, but deepseek won the numbers

AK☄️1 month ago

This loooks dope by deepseek

thehype.1 month ago

solid indeed 👌

Related Videos

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

27,799 views • 1 month ago

Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

0xMarioNawfal

56,376 views • 25 days ago

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash just one shot Minecraft. It built this in 11 minutes and cost less than $0.25. Muse Spark 1.3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash completely failed on this same exact prompt. DeepSeek cooked.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash just one shot Minecraft. It built this in 11 minutes and cost less than $0.25. Muse Spark 1.3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash completely failed on this same exact prompt. DeepSeek cooked.

BridgeMind

47,564 views • 1 month ago

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash at 3D geometry test: six self-contained three.js stereometry scenes — a (3,8) torus knot, a Klein bottle, a great stellated dodecahedron, a hyperboloid ruled by 120 straight rods, a level-3 Menger sponge, a thick Möbius strip. one shot each, no libraries beyond three.js, every surface painted with a live iridescent rainbow that has to crawl across the geometry. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.11 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — $0.27 • gemini delivers all six figures for 2.4× less — 21k output tokens against deepseek's 168k • gemini is 5× faster — every scene under 25 seconds, deepseek took up to 3 minutes on the Möbius strip • deepseek wins the torus knot: its rope is vivid and glossy, while gemini rendered the same knot nearly black • neither model can build a real Klein bottle. both hand back a twisted tube and call it done try both on aimlapi[.]com

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash at 3D geometry test: six self-contained three.js stereometry scenes — a (3,8) torus knot, a Klein bottle, a great stellated dodecahedron, a hyperboloid ruled by 120 straight rods, a level-3 Menger sponge, a thick Möbius strip. one shot each, no libraries beyond three.js, every surface painted with a live iridescent rainbow that has to crawl across the geometry. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.11 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — $0.27 • gemini delivers all six figures for 2.4× less — 21k output tokens against deepseek's 168k • gemini is 5× faster — every scene under 25 seconds, deepseek took up to 3 minutes on the Möbius strip • deepseek wins the torus knot: its rope is vivid and glossy, while gemini rendered the same knot nearly black • neither model can build a real Klein bottle. both hand back a twisted tube and call it done try both on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

39,932 views • 1 month ago

how did DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash became so good both the outputs are from same prompts.. DeepSeek's flash model on max effort smokes Opus 5 on medium effort and the crazy part is it's still 90% cheaper best strategy would be to use Opus for planning and deepseek-v4.1-flash for execution, that would be an insane combo but do you think Gemini 4 Pro could outperform DeepSeek-v4.1-flash?

how did DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash became so good both the outputs are from same prompts.. DeepSeek's flash model on max effort smokes Opus 5 on medium effort and the crazy part is it's still 90% cheaper best strategy would be to use Opus for planning and deepseek-v4.1-flash for execution, that would be an insane combo but do you think Gemini 4 Pro could outperform DeepSeek-v4.1-flash?

Tim Jayas

11,371 views • 1 month ago

Which flash model wins? DeepSeek v4.1 flash, Qwen 3.8 flash, or GLM 5.3 flash 🤯

Which flash model wins? DeepSeek v4.1 flash, Qwen 3.8 flash, or GLM 5.3 flash 🤯

GMI Cloud

15,052 views • 1 month ago

I found a hidden WorkBuddy feature: it’s more than one AI chat. Gpt 6 Astra, Gemini-3.5-Flash, and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash are in one place and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is free for two weeks. No more tab-hopping when I compare models. Here’s my workflow now. WorkBuddy #WorkBuddy

I found a hidden WorkBuddy feature: it’s more than one AI chat. Gpt 6 Astra, Gemini-3.5-Flash, and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash are in one place and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is free for two weeks. No more tab-hopping when I compare models. Here’s my workflow now. WorkBuddy #WorkBuddy

Tyler Wayne

115,147 views • 16 days ago

Gemini Flash 3.8 beats Opus 5 at at 15× lower price the test: four self-contained three.js physics scenes — a balloon popped by a needle, a ball dropping into water, a bomb with a mushroom cloud, a live atom model. 5 seconds each, real gravity, real impact. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.12 Claude Opus 5 — $1.86 what we saw: • gemini passes the same physics checklist for 15× less — the ball sinks and bobs, ripples spread, the mushroom towers over the scene • gemini is 4× faster — every scene generated in under 70 seconds. opus took up to 5 minutes try Gemini 3.8 Flash on aimlapi[.]com

Gemini Flash 3.8 beats Opus 5 at at 15× lower price the test: four self-contained three.js physics scenes — a balloon popped by a needle, a ball dropping into water, a bomb with a mushroom cloud, a live atom model. 5 seconds each, real gravity, real impact. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.12 Claude Opus 5 — $1.86 what we saw: • gemini passes the same physics checklist for 15× less — the ball sinks and bobs, ripples spread, the mushroom towers over the scene • gemini is 4× faster — every scene generated in under 70 seconds. opus took up to 5 minutes try Gemini 3.8 Flash on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

116,252 views • 1 month ago

i just compared DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash against Opus 5 gave same prompt to both models to build ocean sandbox using three.js DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash was almost 90% cheaper and 50% faster than Opus 5 💀 maybe the benchmarks are not broken.. do you think DeepSeek is better?

i just compared DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash against Opus 5 gave same prompt to both models to build ocean sandbox using three.js DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash was almost 90% cheaper and 50% faster than Opus 5 💀 maybe the benchmarks are not broken.. do you think DeepSeek is better?

Tim Jayas

28,561 views • 1 month ago

glm 5.3 vs qwen 3.8 vs gemini 3.7 vs deepseek v4 flash four models designed and built three structures each on a physics-backed site, with no dimensions anywhere in the brief the setup: our own agent loop on OpenRouter, a construction site as the tool set – footings, walls, arches, roofs, scaffold, a lamp. the site enforces physics and nothing else: unsupported brick falls, a roof needs walls under it, a worker reaches 3.2 m above whatever he stands on, an arch needs centring until the keystone is set, concrete cures before it carries. no budget ceiling – material cost is tallied and reported, never blocked. tasks: 1. house – a plot and a palette, no plan. shape, height and material are the model's call 2. lighthouse – a headland cut by a gully, with a rock stack standing 30 m offshore. the lamp must burn, it must be the highest thing built, and the keeper must be able to walk to it 3. bridge – a river with one islet and banks at different heights. cross it however you want models: Z.ai glm 5.3 flash, Qwen qwen 3.8 flash, Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash, DeepSeek v4 flash vision all twelve objects were finished and signed off by the models themselves. tallest lighthouse is qwen's at 38.4 m, planted on the offshore stack with a bridge run out to it – the only model that read the site that way. deepseek signed off its bridge on an empty riverbed: 0 bricks, 107 minutes, $1.16m of material tallied - total cost, three builds #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.201 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.871 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – $1.058 #4 deepseek v4 flash – $1.567 - wall clock, three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 91m #2 glm 5.3 flash – 228m #3 deepseek v4 flash – 502m #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 912m - total tokens #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 3,567,052 #2 glm 5.3 flash – 4,732,748 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – 13,469,333 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 18,230,076 - defects logged by the site #1 deepseek v4 flash – 59 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 132 #3 glm 5.3 flash – 221 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 350 - material tallied across three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – $359,884 #2 glm 5.3 flash – $583,358 #3 deepseek v4 flash – $1,327,484 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – $2,188,625 observations: • glm is the cheap one and nothing here is close – $0.201 for three buildings, $0.042 per million tokens, 6x under gemini's rate • what glm spends it on is bulk, not care: 166,228 bricks in one house and 156 defect weight, the worst single object in the set • gemini is the efficiency line – 91 minutes and 3.57m tokens for all three and an eighth of qwen's clock • gemini also builds the smallest of everything. its lighthouse is 22.5 m against qwen's 38.4, its house 6.9 m against 19.3 • qwen is the maximalist: 1.18m bricks, $2.19m of material, tallest on all three tasks, and 912 minutes – 15 hours – to get there conclusion: twelve finished objects for $3.80 all in, and a 7.8x price spread between the cheapest model and the priciest! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

glm 5.3 vs qwen 3.8 vs gemini 3.7 vs deepseek v4 flash four models designed and built three structures each on a physics-backed site, with no dimensions anywhere in the brief the setup: our own agent loop on OpenRouter, a construction site as the tool set – footings, walls, arches, roofs, scaffold, a lamp. the site enforces physics and nothing else: unsupported brick falls, a roof needs walls under it, a worker reaches 3.2 m above whatever he stands on, an arch needs centring until the keystone is set, concrete cures before it carries. no budget ceiling – material cost is tallied and reported, never blocked. tasks: 1. house – a plot and a palette, no plan. shape, height and material are the model's call 2. lighthouse – a headland cut by a gully, with a rock stack standing 30 m offshore. the lamp must burn, it must be the highest thing built, and the keeper must be able to walk to it 3. bridge – a river with one islet and banks at different heights. cross it however you want models: Z.ai glm 5.3 flash, Qwen qwen 3.8 flash, Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash, DeepSeek v4 flash vision all twelve objects were finished and signed off by the models themselves. tallest lighthouse is qwen's at 38.4 m, planted on the offshore stack with a bridge run out to it – the only model that read the site that way. deepseek signed off its bridge on an empty riverbed: 0 bricks, 107 minutes, $1.16m of material tallied - total cost, three builds #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.201 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.871 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – $1.058 #4 deepseek v4 flash – $1.567 - wall clock, three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 91m #2 glm 5.3 flash – 228m #3 deepseek v4 flash – 502m #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 912m - total tokens #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 3,567,052 #2 glm 5.3 flash – 4,732,748 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – 13,469,333 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 18,230,076 - defects logged by the site #1 deepseek v4 flash – 59 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 132 #3 glm 5.3 flash – 221 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 350 - material tallied across three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – $359,884 #2 glm 5.3 flash – $583,358 #3 deepseek v4 flash – $1,327,484 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – $2,188,625 observations: • glm is the cheap one and nothing here is close – $0.201 for three buildings, $0.042 per million tokens, 6x under gemini's rate • what glm spends it on is bulk, not care: 166,228 bricks in one house and 156 defect weight, the worst single object in the set • gemini is the efficiency line – 91 minutes and 3.57m tokens for all three and an eighth of qwen's clock • gemini also builds the smallest of everything. its lighthouse is 22.5 m against qwen's 38.4, its house 6.9 m against 19.3 • qwen is the maximalist: 1.18m bricks, $2.19m of material, tallest on all three tasks, and 912 minutes – 15 hours – to get there conclusion: twelve finished objects for $3.80 all in, and a 7.8x price spread between the cheapest model and the priciest! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

26,360 views • 2 months ago

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Opus 5.5 on the Bowser 3D test. $0.15 vs. $3.85. This is crazy.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Opus 5.5 on the Bowser 3D test. $0.15 vs. $3.85. This is crazy.

Luckey Faraday

364,320 views • 13 days ago

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini-3.6-Flash both given the exact same prompt to build 3D pirate ship Cost: > deepseek-v4-flash: $0.14 / $0.28 > gemini-3.6-flash: $1.50 / $7.50 though deepseek is 20x cheaper, gemini was surprising faster with the output Prompt used: "build a 3D model of pirate ship in Three js with minimal dashboard buttons in light theme background, with wide view of the pirate ship"

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini-3.6-Flash both given the exact same prompt to build 3D pirate ship Cost: > deepseek-v4-flash: $0.14 / $0.28 > gemini-3.6-flash: $1.50 / $7.50 though deepseek is 20x cheaper, gemini was surprising faster with the output Prompt used: "build a 3D model of pirate ship in Three js with minimal dashboard buttons in light theme background, with wide view of the pirate ship"

Tim Jayas

20,127 views • 2 months ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?

Tim Jayas

76,990 views • 1 month ago

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 The famous Eiffel Tower benchmark is back! 🗼🇫🇷 Same prompt for all four. • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: $0.53, 1h 10m 31s • Muse Spark 1.3: Free, 17m 01s • Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.43, 45m 02s • Gemini 4 Argon: $3.68, 38m 22s Honestly, I'm very impressed with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. 🤯 That tower, the Seine, the gardens, whole blocks of Paris, all for 53 cents. Gemini Argon is still the most polished Paris here, but it cost 7x more. And Muse built its version for FREE in 17 minutes. 😳 What do you guys think? Which Paris would you rather visit? 👀

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 The famous Eiffel Tower benchmark is back! 🗼🇫🇷 Same prompt for all four. • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: $0.53, 1h 10m 31s • Muse Spark 1.3: Free, 17m 01s • Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.43, 45m 02s • Gemini 4 Argon: $3.68, 38m 22s Honestly, I'm very impressed with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. 🤯 That tower, the Seine, the gardens, whole blocks of Paris, all for 53 cents. Gemini Argon is still the most polished Paris here, but it cost 7x more. And Muse built its version for FREE in 17 minutes. 😳 What do you guys think? Which Paris would you rather visit? 👀

Tony

35,918 views • 13 days ago

DeepSeek Deepseek-v4.1-flash-v2 coming 👀!! I'm more convinced something has changed behind the deepseek-platform api. The "deepseek-flash" endpoint seems to be routing to a different model now. It could be: - Deepseek-v4.2-flash - An updated checkpoint of v4.1-flash Since it's also a little slower, i wonder if V4.1-pro is being quietly tested behind the endpoint. But either way, i'm getting way better result, the difference is noticeable. See the comparison video, same prompt, same settings.

DeepSeek Deepseek-v4.1-flash-v2 coming 👀!! I'm more convinced something has changed behind the deepseek-platform api. The "deepseek-flash" endpoint seems to be routing to a different model now. It could be: - Deepseek-v4.2-flash - An updated checkpoint of v4.1-flash Since it's also a little slower, i wonder if V4.1-pro is being quietly tested behind the endpoint. But either way, i'm getting way better result, the difference is noticeable. See the comparison video, same prompt, same settings.

AJ

22,059 views • 18 days ago

Latest models on the self-portrait test 👀 Gemini 3.8 Flash, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Fable 5.1 and Tencent Hy4. Gemini 3.8 Flash looks cool 😎

Latest models on the self-portrait test 👀 Gemini 3.8 Flash, Muse Spark 1.3, Claude Fable 5.1 and Tencent Hy4. Gemini 3.8 Flash looks cool 😎

TypingMind

26,162 views • 1 month ago

uncensored DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for almost FREE 👀 here's how: 1. go to 2. sign in 3. pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Abliterated FP8 what u get: > uncensored DeepSeek V4.1 Flash > 1M context > zero data retention > $0.12 per 1M tokens ( No not a paid promo)

uncensored DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for almost FREE 👀 here's how: 1. go to 2. sign in 3. pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Abliterated FP8 what u get: > uncensored DeepSeek V4.1 Flash > 1M context > zero data retention > $0.12 per 1M tokens ( No not a paid promo)

CDG

14,654 views • 2 days ago

holy sh*t, it can't be f**king real DeepSeek V4.1 Flash just benchmarked at 98% of GPT-6 Astra and it's free on Xplabs what you get: - DeepSeek V4.1 Flash free - and 1000+ models open on the platform how to try it (under 1 min): step 1: go to step 2: search for deepseek-v4.1-flash step 3: select it and start prompting no card, no plan, just use it

holy sh*t, it can't be f**king real DeepSeek V4.1 Flash just benchmarked at 98% of GPT-6 Astra and it's free on Xplabs what you get: - DeepSeek V4.1 Flash free - and 1000+ models open on the platform how to try it (under 1 min): step 1: go to step 2: search for deepseek-v4.1-flash step 3: select it and start prompting no card, no plan, just use it

Sakata

48,301 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Gemini 3.8 Flash first output Gemini 3.8 Flash is getting seriously good at building interactive experience Not perfect, but the progress in generating games is getting ridiculous🔥 Gemini 3.8 Flash is definitely one to watch

🚨 Gemini 3.8 Flash first output Gemini 3.8 Flash is getting seriously good at building interactive experience Not perfect, but the progress in generating games is getting ridiculous🔥 Gemini 3.8 Flash is definitely one to watch

Salio

26,503 views • 1 month ago

GOOGLE 🔥: Gemini 4 Argon has reportedly been A/B-tested under Gemini 3.8 Flash on Antigravity for some time. It seems like a huge jump compared with the existing Flash model. World gen prompt > Gemini 4 Argon (supposedly)

GOOGLE 🔥: Gemini 4 Argon has reportedly been A/B-tested under Gemini 3.8 Flash on Antigravity for some time. It seems like a huge jump compared with the existing Flash model. World gen prompt > Gemini 4 Argon (supposedly)

🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog

40,834 views • 18 days ago