正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

i just compared DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash against Opus 5 gave same prompt to both models to build ocean sandbox using three.js DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash was almost 90% cheaper and 50% faster than Opus 5 💀 maybe the benchmarks are not broken.. do you think DeepSeek is better?

Tim Jayas

5,082 subscribers

28,561 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Bharat Golchha 的头像

Bharat Golchha1 个月前

Absolutely.. I did the same test with Deepseek 4.1 flash See the result below

Tim Jayas 的头像

Tim Jayas1 个月前

quality is really good

Andy Scott 的头像

Andy Scott1 个月前

Looks better too. Damn

Tim Jayas 的头像

Tim Jayas1 个月前

deepseek is surprising competing well against opus 5

Raik R 的头像

Raik R1 个月前

I'm quite convinced that the new American AI models are trained to beat benchmarks rather than to do the real job

Tim Jayas 的头像

Tim Jayas1 个月前

it's all a form of marketing strategy now

John Kler 的头像

John Kler1 个月前

Can you test SWE 2.0 please?

Dave 的头像

Dave1 个月前

prompt or it didn't happen.

Tim Jayas 的头像

Tim Jayas1 个月前

😭 here: "create a highly detailed 3d ocean POV using three.js with waves and thunderstorm in a square sandbox, use white theme background so main object is visible"

Valerii Karivets 的头像

Valerii Karivets1 个月前

90% cheaper and 50% faster is how my carefully curated model stack gets fired. i’m absolutely throwing my ugliest three.js prompt at DeepSeek tonight.

No Hard Problem 的头像

No Hard Problem1 个月前

What about the rest of us not using three.js? Even with Astra we saw game demos and shit most people don't use it for. I just want solid python coding skills not three.js water 🌊. Is that too much to ask?

相关视频

how did DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash became so good both the outputs are from same prompts.. DeepSeek's flash model on max effort smokes Opus 5 on medium effort and the crazy part is it's still 90% cheaper best strategy would be to use Opus for planning and deepseek-v4.1-flash for execution, that would be an insane combo but do you think Gemini 4 Pro could outperform DeepSeek-v4.1-flash?

how did DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash became so good both the outputs are from same prompts.. DeepSeek's flash model on max effort smokes Opus 5 on medium effort and the crazy part is it's still 90% cheaper best strategy would be to use Opus for planning and deepseek-v4.1-flash for execution, that would be an insane combo but do you think Gemini 4 Pro could outperform DeepSeek-v4.1-flash?

Tim Jayas

11,371 次观看 • 1 个月前

Opus 5 vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash tested both models with same frontend prompt at highest reasoning available but results came out really different > opus took 80 minutes to complete and costed $20 > v4.1 flash took 60 minutes and costed $0.2 which one did better here?

Opus 5 vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash tested both models with same frontend prompt at highest reasoning available but results came out really different > opus took 80 minutes to complete and costed $20 > v4.1 flash took 60 minutes and costed $0.2 which one did better here?

J A Z I I

39,045 次观看 • 1 个月前

deepseek v4.1 flash 1017 just mogged opus 5.5 and it was 32x cheaper: deepseek: $0.31 opus 5.5: ~$10 with the right harness and a few iterations, ds4.1 flash is a model you can actually use every day

deepseek v4.1 flash 1017 just mogged opus 5.5 and it was 32x cheaper: deepseek: $0.31 opus 5.5: ~$10 with the right harness and a few iterations, ds4.1 flash is a model you can actually use every day

filipe

32,434 次观看 • 9 天前

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Opus 5.5 on the Bowser 3D test. 25x cheaper.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Opus 5.5 on the Bowser 3D test. 25x cheaper.

0xMarioNawfal - The Roundtable Show

46,622 次观看 • 8 天前

Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Same prompt. Same task. Build a cinematic 3D animation explaining how a Tesla-style electric motor works. Is Opus in trouble?

Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Same prompt. Same task. Build a cinematic 3D animation explaining how a Tesla-style electric motor works. Is Opus in trouble?

Rubens Soto | AI & SaaS

63,030 次观看 • 10 天前

Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

0xMarioNawfal

56,376 次观看 • 22 天前

DeepSeek Deepseek-v4.1-flash-v2 coming 👀!! I'm more convinced something has changed behind the deepseek-platform api. The "deepseek-flash" endpoint seems to be routing to a different model now. It could be: - Deepseek-v4.2-flash - An updated checkpoint of v4.1-flash Since it's also a little slower, i wonder if V4.1-pro is being quietly tested behind the endpoint. But either way, i'm getting way better result, the difference is noticeable. See the comparison video, same prompt, same settings.

DeepSeek Deepseek-v4.1-flash-v2 coming 👀!! I'm more convinced something has changed behind the deepseek-platform api. The "deepseek-flash" endpoint seems to be routing to a different model now. It could be: - Deepseek-v4.2-flash - An updated checkpoint of v4.1-flash Since it's also a little slower, i wonder if V4.1-pro is being quietly tested behind the endpoint. But either way, i'm getting way better result, the difference is noticeable. See the comparison video, same prompt, same settings.

AJ

22,059 次观看 • 15 天前

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 I asked both to build a 3D rocket launch in Three.js. MiniMax: $0.55 DeepSeek: $0.78 MiniMax came out cheaper, with a cleaner liftoff and a bigger flame trail. It understands intent really well, and it’s fast. I’d definitely love to use it for coding. Cheaper than DeepSeek and better quality. Loving it.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 I asked both to build a 3D rocket launch in Three.js. MiniMax: $0.55 DeepSeek: $0.78 MiniMax came out cheaper, with a cleaner liftoff and a bigger flame trail. It understands intent really well, and it’s fast. I’d definitely love to use it for coding. Cheaper than DeepSeek and better quality. Loving it.

Bhavy☄️

18,047 次观看 • 7 天前

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Opus 5.5, round two. Same one-line prompt. This time: AK-47. $0.30 vs. $5.29. This is getting ridiculous.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Opus 5.5, round two. Same one-line prompt. This time: AK-47. $0.30 vs. $5.29. This is getting ridiculous.

Luckey Faraday

67,877 次观看 • 9 天前

DeepSeek V4.1 flash vs Claude Opus 5.5. Does open source catch up again ?

DeepSeek V4.1 flash vs Claude Opus 5.5. Does open source catch up again ?

YouArt

32,595 次观看 • 8 天前

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is great at tutorial-style motion videos. We made this with the model using OpenDesign Motion: a quick guide to using the OpenDesign API in other coding agents to access DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and more models.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is great at tutorial-style motion videos. We made this with the model using OpenDesign Motion: a quick guide to using the OpenDesign API in other coding agents to access DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and more models.

OpenDesign

41,432 次观看 • 10 天前

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Opus 5.5 on the Bowser 3D test. $0.15 vs. $3.85. This is crazy.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs. Opus 5.5 on the Bowser 3D test. $0.15 vs. $3.85. This is crazy.

Luckey Faraday

364,320 次观看 • 10 天前

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Haiku 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 You guys loved the Alpine benchmark with the frontier models, so here it is with the budget models. 🛩️ Honestly, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 blew me away. 🤯 It's 14x cheaper than Haiku and almost 3x faster, and it gave the best result of the four. MiniMax is right behind, and even cheaper at 23 cents. And Muse Spark did it for free! What do you guys think? 👀

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Haiku 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 You guys loved the Alpine benchmark with the frontier models, so here it is with the budget models. 🛩️ Honestly, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 blew me away. 🤯 It's 14x cheaper than Haiku and almost 3x faster, and it gave the best result of the four. MiniMax is right behind, and even cheaper at 23 cents. And Muse Spark did it for free! What do you guys think? 👀

Tony

11,385 次观看 • 7 天前

GLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Can't believe we're abusing gummy bears to test models, but here we are! Both models were run locally. - GLM 5.3 Flash: my own EXL3 quant (link below) - DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: official quant - Same harness.Both on Max effort. Who won?

GLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Can't believe we're abusing gummy bears to test models, but here we are! Both models were run locally. - GLM 5.3 Flash: my own EXL3 quant (link below) - DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: official quant - Same harness.Both on Max effort. Who won?

Mia

32,512 次观看 • 9 天前

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the first open-weight model I've tried that feels this fucking close to Opus at Blender + Three.js. It made this video 👇

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the first open-weight model I've tried that feels this fucking close to Opus at Blender + Three.js. It made this video 👇

Alexey Fateev

24,147 次观看 • 10 天前

deepseek v4.1 flash ran all four three.js scenes for $0.15. gemini 3.8 flash needed $1.25 we put the two models on one job: a self-contained html page that renders an animated 3d scene with three.js – a storm at sea, a spiral galaxy, a tornado over farmland, a tesla coil on a dark table. same prompt - calls until all four scenes were usable #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 6 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 12 - time #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 13m 57s #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 32m 02s - cost #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.15 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – $1.25 observations: • gemini blew out the exposure on 4 of 5 first attempts – a white blob where the tesla coil should be. the prompt had a paragraph on exposure. it did not help. • both models overcorrect in the fix loop: "too bright" becomes "almost black". round two is where it lands. same four scenes, 6 calls and $0.15 against 12 calls and $1.25!

deepseek v4.1 flash ran all four three.js scenes for $0.15. gemini 3.8 flash needed $1.25 we put the two models on one job: a self-contained html page that renders an animated 3d scene with three.js – a storm at sea, a spiral galaxy, a tornado over farmland, a tesla coil on a dark table. same prompt - calls until all four scenes were usable #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 6 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 12 - time #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 13m 57s #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 32m 02s - cost #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.15 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – $1.25 observations: • gemini blew out the exposure on 4 of 5 first attempts – a white blob where the tesla coil should be. the prompt had a paragraph on exposure. it did not help. • both models overcorrect in the fix loop: "too bright" becomes "almost black". round two is where it lands. same four scenes, 6 calls and $0.15 against 12 calls and $1.25!

thehype.

62,603 次观看 • 1 个月前

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT 6.1 Sol I tested this rocket launch scene and DeepSeek absolutely cooked with this model. DeepSeek : $0.78, 3 mins GPT 6.1 Sol: $6.10, 5 mins Nearly 8x cheaper than Sol, and faster too. This thing is a beast.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT 6.1 Sol I tested this rocket launch scene and DeepSeek absolutely cooked with this model. DeepSeek : $0.78, 3 mins GPT 6.1 Sol: $6.10, 5 mins Nearly 8x cheaper than Sol, and faster too. This thing is a beast.

Bhavy☄️

110,538 次观看 • 10 天前

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash via API is almost TOO fast 🤯

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash via API is almost TOO fast 🤯

Mia

139,414 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 You can use GPT-6 Astra as the orchestrator and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash as the agents to cut costs by more than 88% while maintaining the same level of quality. And now it’s even better, since DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is one of the best models for cybersecurity at an incredibly low price

🚨 You can use GPT-6 Astra as the orchestrator and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash as the agents to cut costs by more than 88% while maintaining the same level of quality. And now it’s even better, since DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is one of the best models for cybersecurity at an incredibly low price

Iam_

32,768 次观看 • 1 个月前

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash just one shot Minecraft. It built this in 11 minutes and cost less than $0.25. Muse Spark 1.3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash completely failed on this same exact prompt. DeepSeek cooked.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash just one shot Minecraft. It built this in 11 minutes and cost less than $0.25. Muse Spark 1.3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash completely failed on this same exact prompt. DeepSeek cooked.

BridgeMind

47,564 次观看 • 1 个月前