Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

DEI doesn’t end discrimination. It just changes who gets discriminated against. Inez Stepman ⚪️🔴⚪️: America should judge people by merit, NOT race, sex, or any other immutable characteristic. Equal treatment means equal treatment. Period.

Independent Women

301,185 subscribers

46,074 просмотров • 9 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Образование Юмор Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

We should not divvy people up based on race, ethnicity, or gender — let’s treat people as individuals. There should be no discrimination against anyone, but that doesn’t just go for ethnic or racial minorities. It also means you don’t discriminate against white Americans or Asian Americans.

We should not divvy people up based on race, ethnicity, or gender — let’s treat people as individuals. There should be no discrimination against anyone, but that doesn’t just go for ethnic or racial minorities. It also means you don’t discriminate against white Americans or Asian Americans.

Ron DeSantis

447,381 просмотров • 2 лет назад

DEI isn’t just exclusionary because it doles out jobs and funding based on race and sex instead of merit. On top of that, anyone who dares call it racist gets censured, fired, or cancelled—for the crime of standing up against it.

DEI isn’t just exclusionary because it doles out jobs and funding based on race and sex instead of merit. On top of that, anyone who dares call it racist gets censured, fired, or cancelled—for the crime of standing up against it.

Vincent Neil Ho

14,202 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Brandon Johnson said the quiet part out loud: Hire based on race. That’s not progress. That’s discrimination repackaged. We’ve gone from equal opportunity.. to preferential treatment.. to institutionalized bias under the banner of DEI. Let’s be clear: America doesn’t have a shortage of talent. We have millions of highly qualified Americans, who have put in the work, earned the degrees, built the skills, and deserve to be judged on merit. Not skin color. Not checkboxes. A true meritocracy says: the best person gets the job. That’s not controversial, it’s the foundation of excellence. When you lower standards or bypass the most qualified candidate to satisfy an identity quota, you don’t create equity. You create doubt, division, and decline. And here’s the truth most Americans already know: Nobody wants to be hired because of their race. They want to be hired because they’re capable. Because they’ve sacrificed. Because they’ve prepared. Because they’ve earned it. That’s the promise of America. Judge us by our work. Judge us by our character. Judge us by what we bring to the table. Not what we look like. We are one nation. And in this nation, merit still matters.

Brandon Johnson said the quiet part out loud: Hire based on race. That’s not progress. That’s discrimination repackaged. We’ve gone from equal opportunity.. to preferential treatment.. to institutionalized bias under the banner of DEI. Let’s be clear: America doesn’t have a shortage of talent. We have millions of highly qualified Americans, who have put in the work, earned the degrees, built the skills, and deserve to be judged on merit. Not skin color. Not checkboxes. A true meritocracy says: the best person gets the job. That’s not controversial, it’s the foundation of excellence. When you lower standards or bypass the most qualified candidate to satisfy an identity quota, you don’t create equity. You create doubt, division, and decline. And here’s the truth most Americans already know: Nobody wants to be hired because of their race. They want to be hired because they’re capable. Because they’ve sacrificed. Because they’ve prepared. Because they’ve earned it. That’s the promise of America. Judge us by our work. Judge us by our character. Judge us by what we bring to the table. Not what we look like. We are one nation. And in this nation, merit still matters.

Wesley Hunt

47,600 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

A UK jury has failed to convict the two Muslim men involved in the 2024 Manchester Airport police assault case. Meanwhile, many people feel there are completely different standards depending on who you are and what case is involved. That’s why trust in policing, the courts and the media is collapsing across Britain. People want equal justice, equal treatment and equal accountability regardless of background, religion or race. This just proves British justice doesn’t exist anymore and if you are of a certain race and religion you are able to do whatever you bloody like.

A UK jury has failed to convict the two Muslim men involved in the 2024 Manchester Airport police assault case. Meanwhile, many people feel there are completely different standards depending on who you are and what case is involved. That’s why trust in policing, the courts and the media is collapsing across Britain. People want equal justice, equal treatment and equal accountability regardless of background, religion or race. This just proves British justice doesn’t exist anymore and if you are of a certain race and religion you are able to do whatever you bloody like.

Benonwine

18,971 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: "We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called" If 'wokism' means judging people by race, gender, or identity - that's racism If DEI means giving advantages based on skin color - that's racism rebranded Racism against white people is still racism Racism against black people is still racism There are no exceptions We need a meritocracy - where people rise based on talent and hard work, not identity politics And free speech only means something when people you disagree with are allowed to speak

Elon Musk: "We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called" If 'wokism' means judging people by race, gender, or identity - that's racism If DEI means giving advantages based on skin color - that's racism rebranded Racism against white people is still racism Racism against black people is still racism There are no exceptions We need a meritocracy - where people rise based on talent and hard work, not identity politics And free speech only means something when people you disagree with are allowed to speak

X Freeze

123,149 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. “If by wokeism one means racism on the basis of sex and gender and other matters, DEI is simply racism, rebranded. Yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against white people or black people or Asians or anyone else. And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called, DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. So, we should really, in my view have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory.” From: WELT Economic Summit, January 28, 2025

Elon Musk: I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. “If by wokeism one means racism on the basis of sex and gender and other matters, DEI is simply racism, rebranded. Yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against white people or black people or Asians or anyone else. And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called, DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. So, we should really, in my view have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory.” From: WELT Economic Summit, January 28, 2025

ELON CLIPS

61,296 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🇩🇪🔴“Black bodies in German nature simply hits differently. You have to experience it.” A hiking group only for Black people is being praised by public media in Germany. Such a group could actually be illegal in Germany under the “General Equal Treatment Act,” which prohibits discrimination based on ethnic origin. There is also a good chance that an explicitly “White-only” hiking group would end up having its members doxxed, smeared and potentially even arrested.

🇩🇪🔴“Black bodies in German nature simply hits differently. You have to experience it.” A hiking group only for Black people is being praised by public media in Germany. Such a group could actually be illegal in Germany under the “General Equal Treatment Act,” which prohibits discrimination based on ethnic origin. There is also a good chance that an explicitly “White-only” hiking group would end up having its members doxxed, smeared and potentially even arrested.

Remix News & Views

48,638 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Most people who call themselves liberals aren’t. Classical liberalism means individual rights, free markets, limited government, free speech, and equality before the law. That describes the American right. Not the American left. The left believes the group outweighs the individual. Government should engineer outcomes. Speech should be regulated. Race should be central to policy. And the West should be deconstructed. That’s not liberalism. That’s a different ideology with a borrowed name. Here’s what liberalism actually looks like. Free speech — including speech you hate. Equal treatment under law regardless of race. Limited government. Free markets. Western civilization as something worth defending. If that’s what you believe, you’re a liberal. You’re just not welcome in the party that took the word.

Most people who call themselves liberals aren’t. Classical liberalism means individual rights, free markets, limited government, free speech, and equality before the law. That describes the American right. Not the American left. The left believes the group outweighs the individual. Government should engineer outcomes. Speech should be regulated. Race should be central to policy. And the West should be deconstructed. That’s not liberalism. That’s a different ideology with a borrowed name. Here’s what liberalism actually looks like. Free speech — including speech you hate. Equal treatment under law regardless of race. Limited government. Free markets. Western civilization as something worth defending. If that’s what you believe, you’re a liberal. You’re just not welcome in the party that took the word.

Jake

35,009 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

STALIN (1934): "These people evidently think that socialism calls for equalization, for leveling the requirements and personal, everyday life of the members of society. Needless to say, such an assumption has nothing in common with Marxism, with Leninism. By equality Marxism means, not equalization of personal requirements and everyday life, but the abolition of classes, i.e., a) the equal emancipation of all working people from exploitation after the capitalists have been overthrown and expropriated; b) the equal abolition for all of private property in the means of production after they have been converted into the property of the whole of society; c) the equal duty of all to work according to their ability, and the equal right of all working people to receive in return for this according to the work performed (socialist society); d) the equal duty of all to work according to their ability, and the equal right of all working people to receive in return for this according to their needs (communist society). Moreover, Marxism proceeds from the assumption that people's tastes and requirements are not, and cannot be, identical and equal in regard to quality or quantity, whether in the period of socialism or in the period of communism. There you have the Marxist conception of equality. Marxism has never recognized, and does not recognize, any other equality.... The bourgeois writers are fond of depicting Marxist socialism as an old tsarist barracks where everything is subject to the “principle” of equalization. But Marxists cannot be responsible for the ignorance and stupidity of bourgeois writers."

STALIN (1934): "These people evidently think that socialism calls for equalization, for leveling the requirements and personal, everyday life of the members of society. Needless to say, such an assumption has nothing in common with Marxism, with Leninism. By equality Marxism means, not equalization of personal requirements and everyday life, but the abolition of classes, i.e., a) the equal emancipation of all working people from exploitation after the capitalists have been overthrown and expropriated; b) the equal abolition for all of private property in the means of production after they have been converted into the property of the whole of society; c) the equal duty of all to work according to their ability, and the equal right of all working people to receive in return for this according to the work performed (socialist society); d) the equal duty of all to work according to their ability, and the equal right of all working people to receive in return for this according to their needs (communist society). Moreover, Marxism proceeds from the assumption that people's tastes and requirements are not, and cannot be, identical and equal in regard to quality or quantity, whether in the period of socialism or in the period of communism. There you have the Marxist conception of equality. Marxism has never recognized, and does not recognize, any other equality.... The bourgeois writers are fond of depicting Marxist socialism as an old tsarist barracks where everything is subject to the “principle” of equalization. But Marxists cannot be responsible for the ignorance and stupidity of bourgeois writers."

COMBATE |🇵🇷

60,248 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 JUST IN: The Trump DOJ has secured a $30 MILLION settlement with PayPal to END its DEI program, per AAG Dhillon AAGHarmeetDhillon has made PayPal agree to put that $30 million toward VETERAN-OWNED and farming, manufacturing, and tech companies certified by the SBA. “PayPal made $530 million worth of capital available as loans on a preferential basis only to minority-owned businesses,” Asst. AG Dhillon said. “This, of course, discriminated against many other types of American businesses, who are all entitled to the protection of the Equal Credit Protection Act.”

🚨 JUST IN: The Trump DOJ has secured a $30 MILLION settlement with PayPal to END its DEI program, per AAG Dhillon AAGHarmeetDhillon has made PayPal agree to put that $30 million toward VETERAN-OWNED and farming, manufacturing, and tech companies certified by the SBA. “PayPal made $530 million worth of capital available as loans on a preferential basis only to minority-owned businesses,” Asst. AG Dhillon said. “This, of course, discriminated against many other types of American businesses, who are all entitled to the protection of the Equal Credit Protection Act.”

Nick Sortor

226,532 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 THE NEW YORK TIMES JUST GOT EXPOSED DISCRIMINATING AGAINST WHITE MEN President Trump's Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is SUING the NYT after they gave a non-white female a job who was PROVABLY unqualified — over an objectively qualified white male Good! No racial discrimination, PERIOD "An employee at the Times is claiming DEI policies cost him a promotion in 2025, and at Times allegedly broke the story on itself." "The lawsuit claims the Times' race and gender goals influenced his decision not to advance the employee. It also claims the final round of candidates matched the race and gender the paper wanted more of in leadership, a white female, black male, Asian female, and multi-racial female."

🚨 THE NEW YORK TIMES JUST GOT EXPOSED DISCRIMINATING AGAINST WHITE MEN President Trump's Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is SUING the NYT after they gave a non-white female a job who was PROVABLY unqualified — over an objectively qualified white male Good! No racial discrimination, PERIOD "An employee at the Times is claiming DEI policies cost him a promotion in 2025, and at Times allegedly broke the story on itself." "The lawsuit claims the Times' race and gender goals influenced his decision not to advance the employee. It also claims the final round of candidates matched the race and gender the paper wanted more of in leadership, a white female, black male, Asian female, and multi-racial female."

Eric Daugherty

23,727 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

After thousands came out to our protest against Zohran Mamdani in New York City, it was my pleasure to speak with HARRISFAULKNER on Fox News about the civil rights crisis facing the Jewish community in America. For years, Jewish students have faced harassment, intimidation, discrimination, and even violence on campuses across the country while institutions and activists excuse it as “resistance.” No other minority group would be told their civil rights are conditional or up for political debate. This is not just about politics. It is about whether Jewish Americans are entitled to the same protections, dignity, and equal treatment as everyone else under the law. Big thanks to Harris for continuing to cover an issue too many are afraid to confront honestly. The Faulkner Focus

After thousands came out to our protest against Zohran Mamdani in New York City, it was my pleasure to speak with HARRISFAULKNER on Fox News about the civil rights crisis facing the Jewish community in America. For years, Jewish students have faced harassment, intimidation, discrimination, and even violence on campuses across the country while institutions and activists excuse it as “resistance.” No other minority group would be told their civil rights are conditional or up for political debate. This is not just about politics. It is about whether Jewish Americans are entitled to the same protections, dignity, and equal treatment as everyone else under the law. Big thanks to Harris for continuing to cover an issue too many are afraid to confront honestly. The Faulkner Focus

Brooke Goldstein

57,183 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“Are you not the ones who keep telling us that we are all equal before God? Are we really equal before God? Is any one of us better than the other? Why are there those who tell us “You know this morning I heard a voice and I recognized it as the voice of God.” God only appears to you, and he cannot appear to others? Does God tell you when he appears to you that you should go and kill people or lie or even steal from them? If it is true that he appears to you, I would be happy to hear the message he gave you, if it is a message that is good for all of us, who would not want to hear it? But if you pretend that God has appeared to you and you start misleading people, telling them they should not eat, asking them to reject medical treatment, and you say that you were sent, by whom? Not only God but also a reasonable human being cannot send you to do such things. And you are lying to us that you were sent by God? Really? Another confusion that people have is that they are afraid to condemn someone who does such bad things or who gives a wrong message because it would supposedly mean that they are against God since all those bad deeds are done under the cover of the name of God.” President Kagame | Thanksgiving Prayer Breakfast.

“Are you not the ones who keep telling us that we are all equal before God? Are we really equal before God? Is any one of us better than the other? Why are there those who tell us “You know this morning I heard a voice and I recognized it as the voice of God.” God only appears to you, and he cannot appear to others? Does God tell you when he appears to you that you should go and kill people or lie or even steal from them? If it is true that he appears to you, I would be happy to hear the message he gave you, if it is a message that is good for all of us, who would not want to hear it? But if you pretend that God has appeared to you and you start misleading people, telling them they should not eat, asking them to reject medical treatment, and you say that you were sent, by whom? Not only God but also a reasonable human being cannot send you to do such things. And you are lying to us that you were sent by God? Really? Another confusion that people have is that they are afraid to condemn someone who does such bad things or who gives a wrong message because it would supposedly mean that they are against God since all those bad deeds are done under the cover of the name of God.” President Kagame | Thanksgiving Prayer Breakfast.

Presidency | Rwanda

150,267 просмотров • 1 год назад

As Thomas Sowell said: “Racism is not dead, but it is on life support — kept alive by politicians, race hustlers, and people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as ‘racists.’” Should skin color determine your vote in 2026? The entire American experiment was built on the opposite idea. The Declaration established a revolutionary principle for its time: that all men are created equal and possess equal rights under God. America didn’t always live up to that standard, but each generation has fought to bring it closer to reality. An enlightened society should reject the idea that race determines political identity. Progressives want to keep that antiquated narrative alive. Conservatives want to promote an enlightened society. The difference here could not be more clear. The left wants to live in the past. Conservatives want to begin our future.

As Thomas Sowell said: “Racism is not dead, but it is on life support — kept alive by politicians, race hustlers, and people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as ‘racists.’” Should skin color determine your vote in 2026? The entire American experiment was built on the opposite idea. The Declaration established a revolutionary principle for its time: that all men are created equal and possess equal rights under God. America didn’t always live up to that standard, but each generation has fought to bring it closer to reality. An enlightened society should reject the idea that race determines political identity. Progressives want to keep that antiquated narrative alive. Conservatives want to promote an enlightened society. The difference here could not be more clear. The left wants to live in the past. Conservatives want to begin our future.

Dan Crenshaw

35,348 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Based Black Woman Drops TRUTH BOMB: You CAN Be Racist Against White People And The Left's Hypocrisy Is EXPOSED! Listen up, folks. This sister right here is speaking straight facts from the driver's seat, and it's refreshing as hell in 2026. She's not mincing words: Racism isn't some one-way ticket invented by college professors to guilt-trip Americans. It's judging, hating, or discriminating against someone because of their skin color, period. Whether it's calling all White people "colonizers," saying they have "no culture," denying qualified White kids jobs or scholarships, or straight-up admitting you "don't trust White people"... that's textbook racism. And she's right, it's about NOW, not some endless history lesson used as a shield for anti-White bigotry. The same crowd screaming "racism" 24/7 suddenly goes blind when the target is pale. That's not "anti-racism." That's racism with a special preference for everyone except heritage Americans. America was built on the idea that we're all created equal under God, not this divisive skin-game nonsense pushed by race hustlers. This woman gets it. Real equality means the rules apply the same to everybody — no exceptions, no sacred cows. Who agrees?

Based Black Woman Drops TRUTH BOMB: You CAN Be Racist Against White People And The Left's Hypocrisy Is EXPOSED! Listen up, folks. This sister right here is speaking straight facts from the driver's seat, and it's refreshing as hell in 2026. She's not mincing words: Racism isn't some one-way ticket invented by college professors to guilt-trip Americans. It's judging, hating, or discriminating against someone because of their skin color, period. Whether it's calling all White people "colonizers," saying they have "no culture," denying qualified White kids jobs or scholarships, or straight-up admitting you "don't trust White people"... that's textbook racism. And she's right, it's about NOW, not some endless history lesson used as a shield for anti-White bigotry. The same crowd screaming "racism" 24/7 suddenly goes blind when the target is pale. That's not "anti-racism." That's racism with a special preference for everyone except heritage Americans. America was built on the idea that we're all created equal under God, not this divisive skin-game nonsense pushed by race hustlers. This woman gets it. Real equality means the rules apply the same to everybody — no exceptions, no sacred cows. Who agrees?

AmericanPapaBear™

55,573 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk: We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called If “wokism” means racism based on sex, gender, or identity, and DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called DEI and wokism essentially advocate racism and sexism; that is wrong They are also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work That should be the only way that people succeed not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if the people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant

Elon Musk: We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called If “wokism” means racism based on sex, gender, or identity, and DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called DEI and wokism essentially advocate racism and sexism; that is wrong They are also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work That should be the only way that people succeed not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if the people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant

X Freeze

31,865 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

ELON: AIs NEED CONSISTENCY OR THEY GO INSANE “There just needs to be consistency. If it's okay to have, let's say, black, or Asian, or Indian pride, it should be okay to have white pride, too. That's just a consistency question. If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of, I guess, all religions—as long as part of that religion is not exterminating people who are not in that religion. It's really just ensuring consistency to eliminate bias. So, if it's possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race. Arguing against that is a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane.” Source: Elon Musk on The Joe Rogan Experience Joe Rogan, October 31, 2025

ELON: AIs NEED CONSISTENCY OR THEY GO INSANE “There just needs to be consistency. If it's okay to have, let's say, black, or Asian, or Indian pride, it should be okay to have white pride, too. That's just a consistency question. If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of, I guess, all religions—as long as part of that religion is not exterminating people who are not in that religion. It's really just ensuring consistency to eliminate bias. So, if it's possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race. Arguing against that is a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane.” Source: Elon Musk on The Joe Rogan Experience Joe Rogan, October 31, 2025

Mario Nawfal

49,143 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад