Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Democrats are making something clear: if concerns about a candidate are legitimate, they should be addressed. But we are not going to be lectured by the party of Donald Trump, Ken Paxton, or other Republicans who have been accused of things like putting boiling water on their wives during... show more

Jessica Tarlov

294,067 subscribers

395,457 views • 24 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

There are Democrats who have concerns about Platner, but the idea that we’ll be lectured by folks that support Donald Trump and want Texans to choose Ken Paxton is ludicrous. The man’s wife left him on biblical grounds! Mainers know who Platner is and chose him anyway. They want to win that seat and think Platner is best suited to do it.

There are Democrats who have concerns about Platner, but the idea that we’ll be lectured by folks that support Donald Trump and want Texans to choose Ken Paxton is ludicrous. The man’s wife left him on biblical grounds! Mainers know who Platner is and chose him anyway. They want to win that seat and think Platner is best suited to do it.

Jessica Tarlov

528,240 views • 28 days ago

Graham Platner: “Everybody knows in their bones they are being robbed and screwed. It is why we are angry. We need to be again the party to tap into that anger. We need to be the party that has the message to tell people who is to blame. We spend a lot of time pointing fingers left and right, but we should be pointing fingers in only one direction and that is up.”

Graham Platner: “Everybody knows in their bones they are being robbed and screwed. It is why we are angry. We need to be again the party to tap into that anger. We need to be the party that has the message to tell people who is to blame. We spend a lot of time pointing fingers left and right, but we should be pointing fingers in only one direction and that is up.”

Marco Foster

10,727 views • 6 months ago

Shermichael Singleton just singlehandedly destroyed the Democrats’ case for their embattled Senate candidate Graham Platner. All he had to do was call out the blatant double standard — and he did it right in the face of Democrat shill Ro Khanna. SINGLETON: “I find that a bit ironic.” “For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation.” “That they were standing up for justice, that they were upholding morality, that they said Trump was an affront to.” “And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade.” “You have this guy who’s saying he’s going to make a speech to draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins.” “He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh.” “Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who’s now the defender of women.” “So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it’s convenient for them.” “But now that there’s a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could out seat Susan Collins, you know what?” “It doesn’t necessarily matter, the ten plus years of arguments we’ve made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who’ve empowered Trump, because we can win a seat.” “It’s very machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void.” “They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars.” “And I think as we get into the general election, you’re going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the nrsc, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are.” “Look at who they’re supporting, the guy with the Nazi tattoo.” Democrats have no moral authority left. Shermichael Singleton

Shermichael Singleton just singlehandedly destroyed the Democrats’ case for their embattled Senate candidate Graham Platner. All he had to do was call out the blatant double standard — and he did it right in the face of Democrat shill Ro Khanna. SINGLETON: “I find that a bit ironic.” “For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation.” “That they were standing up for justice, that they were upholding morality, that they said Trump was an affront to.” “And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade.” “You have this guy who’s saying he’s going to make a speech to draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins.” “He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh.” “Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who’s now the defender of women.” “So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it’s convenient for them.” “But now that there’s a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could out seat Susan Collins, you know what?” “It doesn’t necessarily matter, the ten plus years of arguments we’ve made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who’ve empowered Trump, because we can win a seat.” “It’s very machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void.” “They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars.” “And I think as we get into the general election, you’re going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the nrsc, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are.” “Look at who they’re supporting, the guy with the Nazi tattoo.” Democrats have no moral authority left. Shermichael Singleton

Overton

136,401 views • 20 days ago

This is why Shermichael Singleton Singleton won the Media Research Center's Bulldog Award for Outstanding Achievement Behind Enemy Lines. Tonight on CNN, he calls out the left for supporting Graham Platner and proving themselves to be "nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars": "I find that a bit ironic. For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation. They were standing up for justice. They were upholding morality that they said Trump was an affront to. And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade. You have this guy who's saying he's going to make a speech to make a con- or draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins. He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh. Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who's now the defender of women? So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it's convenient for them. But now that there's a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could [un]seat Susan Collins, you know what? It doesn't necessarily matter, the ten-plus years of arguments we've made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who empower Trump, because we can win a seat. It's very Machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void. They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars. And I think as we get into the general election, you're going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the NRSC, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are. Look at who they're supporting the guy with the Nazi tattoo.

This is why Shermichael Singleton Singleton won the Media Research Center's Bulldog Award for Outstanding Achievement Behind Enemy Lines. Tonight on CNN, he calls out the left for supporting Graham Platner and proving themselves to be "nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars": "I find that a bit ironic. For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation. They were standing up for justice. They were upholding morality that they said Trump was an affront to. And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade. You have this guy who's saying he's going to make a speech to make a con- or draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins. He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh. Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who's now the defender of women? So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it's convenient for them. But now that there's a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could [un]seat Susan Collins, you know what? It doesn't necessarily matter, the ten-plus years of arguments we've made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who empower Trump, because we can win a seat. It's very Machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void. They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars. And I think as we get into the general election, you're going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the NRSC, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are. Look at who they're supporting the guy with the Nazi tattoo.

Nicholas Fondacaro

53,787 views • 20 days ago

Hasan explains his stance on Democrats & if he’ll support candidates like Gavin Newsom Says they should not take his and the left flank’s vote for granted but still believes republicans are far more damaging “I want the Dem party to treat me like a Never-Trumper..want the Dem party to treat me like a triple Trump voter..cuz it turns out that’s all they’re tuned into..if what it takes for democrats to turn around and be like wait a minute, we’re losing this guy..instead of taking my vote for granted as they’ve done so over and over again for the left flank..then I’m gonna say things that may or may not end up being true..but it doesn’t matter, we’re so far out..now is ur opportunity to find a good candidate instead” “I hate republicans..think the republicans are far more damaging..the biggest terr*rists..I want to fight against the growing fascist movement in this country..my frustration w the Dems is their conciliatory attitude towards that” (Via Pod Save America)

Hasan explains his stance on Democrats & if he’ll support candidates like Gavin Newsom Says they should not take his and the left flank’s vote for granted but still believes republicans are far more damaging “I want the Dem party to treat me like a Never-Trumper..want the Dem party to treat me like a triple Trump voter..cuz it turns out that’s all they’re tuned into..if what it takes for democrats to turn around and be like wait a minute, we’re losing this guy..instead of taking my vote for granted as they’ve done so over and over again for the left flank..then I’m gonna say things that may or may not end up being true..but it doesn’t matter, we’re so far out..now is ur opportunity to find a good candidate instead” “I hate republicans..think the republicans are far more damaging..the biggest terr*rists..I want to fight against the growing fascist movement in this country..my frustration w the Dems is their conciliatory attitude towards that” (Via Pod Save America)

yeet

40,949 views • 2 months ago

Pritzker: "MAGA Republicans in Congress may be in control now, but in 2026 they will not be unless Donald Trump does something to change this country fundamentally. And that is what he's trying to do ... we Democrats are going to win in 2026, but not if Donald Trump is allowed to cheat."

Pritzker: "MAGA Republicans in Congress may be in control now, but in 2026 they will not be unless Donald Trump does something to change this country fundamentally. And that is what he's trying to do ... we Democrats are going to win in 2026, but not if Donald Trump is allowed to cheat."

Aaron Rupar

35,518 views • 9 months ago

Asmongold explains why Graham Platner is one of the "most beneficial" things that could have happened to the Republicans "I think Graham Platner is actually great for the Democrats..he completely destroys their moral high ground against Trump..really great so many of them are rallying around" "I think that to a certain extent that they did have a point that Donald Trump..bad actor in a lot of ways..but none of that matters whenever they're defending ppl that are doing things that are equivalent" "I would say middle of the road ppl care about it (Platner's allegations)..it is still a point that they had..Biden for all of his faults was not anywhere near as morally ambiguous as Donald Trump was" "Keep this in mind whenever they want to disqualify anybody for being racist or saying some sort of other bad stuff..all of their morality is performative..this is one the most beneficial things that could have ever happened to Republicans..now it shows and reveals how completely hypocritical Democrats are"

Asmongold explains why Graham Platner is one of the "most beneficial" things that could have happened to the Republicans "I think Graham Platner is actually great for the Democrats..he completely destroys their moral high ground against Trump..really great so many of them are rallying around" "I think that to a certain extent that they did have a point that Donald Trump..bad actor in a lot of ways..but none of that matters whenever they're defending ppl that are doing things that are equivalent" "I would say middle of the road ppl care about it (Platner's allegations)..it is still a point that they had..Biden for all of his faults was not anywhere near as morally ambiguous as Donald Trump was" "Keep this in mind whenever they want to disqualify anybody for being racist or saying some sort of other bad stuff..all of their morality is performative..this is one the most beneficial things that could have ever happened to Republicans..now it shows and reveals how completely hypocritical Democrats are"

yeet

25,044 views • 18 days ago

I do not know how we got here to a place where this is even something we need to speak about, but we are here and we have to be real! Enough is enough ! Enough with the lies ! Enough with the trying to create something that doesn’t need to exist! men are men women are women THATS IT.

I do not know how we got here to a place where this is even something we need to speak about, but we are here and we have to be real! Enough is enough ! Enough with the lies ! Enough with the trying to create something that doesn’t need to exist! men are men women are women THATS IT.

Tish Hyman

301,923 views • 7 months ago

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,482 views • 1 month ago

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

Mario Nawfal

12,668,082 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk: It shouldn't be up to a few media oligarchs to steer the narrative. “The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – they do that – but their choice of narrative. What are they going to talk about? By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. Whereas, I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 19, 2024

Elon Musk: It shouldn't be up to a few media oligarchs to steer the narrative. “The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – they do that – but their choice of narrative. What are they going to talk about? By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. Whereas, I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

2,288,210 views • 1 year ago

NEW: Sage Steele says what millions are thinking—the Democrats have “lost their mind.” And voters are fed up with the party of “We hate whatever Trump does.” “They seem to have kind of lost their mind. Instead of focusing on what can make their party better, bring them back, they’re going nuts on other things. And to me, that is very, very telling. I think for years, the Democrats took for granted that people were just going to believe them…” —Sage Steele Now, no one trusts the Democrats OR the media that lies for them. Seems like a very bad spot to be in.

NEW: Sage Steele says what millions are thinking—the Democrats have “lost their mind.” And voters are fed up with the party of “We hate whatever Trump does.” “They seem to have kind of lost their mind. Instead of focusing on what can make their party better, bring them back, they’re going nuts on other things. And to me, that is very, very telling. I think for years, the Democrats took for granted that people were just going to believe them…” —Sage Steele Now, no one trusts the Democrats OR the media that lies for them. Seems like a very bad spot to be in.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

143,415 views • 1 year ago

Reporter: Yesterday, President Trump said as a result of the shutdown, "We will be laying off a lot of people that are going to be very affected," and "They are going to be Democrats." Vance: We are not targeting federal agencies based on politics Reporter: But he said "They are going to Democrats."

Reporter: Yesterday, President Trump said as a result of the shutdown, "We will be laying off a lot of people that are going to be very affected," and "They are going to be Democrats." Vance: We are not targeting federal agencies based on politics Reporter: But he said "They are going to Democrats."

Acyn

3,741,068 views • 9 months ago

BREAKING: Trump is STANDING FIRM against Schumer and has no fear of a government shutdown, because it will be THEIR FAULT! "I think we could very well end up with a closed country for a period of time. We’ll take care of the military and take care of Social Security, we’ll take care of the things we have to take care of." "A lot of the things the Democrats fight for, which are not very good things, are not going to be able to be paid, and we’ll watch and see how they do with that" He is calling their bluff.

BREAKING: Trump is STANDING FIRM against Schumer and has no fear of a government shutdown, because it will be THEIR FAULT! "I think we could very well end up with a closed country for a period of time. We’ll take care of the military and take care of Social Security, we’ll take care of the things we have to take care of." "A lot of the things the Democrats fight for, which are not very good things, are not going to be able to be paid, and we’ll watch and see how they do with that" He is calling their bluff.

Gunther Eagleman™

1,447,349 views • 9 months ago

.Secretary Sean Duffy: “Democrats have a radical base, a base that is out of control… If they vote to open up the government they are going to be primaried, they are going to be attacked…Democrats are concerned about their own hides and they’ve sold the country to the most radical element of the country.”

.Secretary Sean Duffy: “Democrats have a radical base, a base that is out of control… If they vote to open up the government they are going to be primaried, they are going to be attacked…Democrats are concerned about their own hides and they’ve sold the country to the most radical element of the country.”

USDOT Rapid Response

18,907 views • 8 months ago

#BREAKING: Psaki: “Bad press for #KenPaxton is expected to only get WORSE because Paxton is currently in the middle of a messy divorce from his wife after allegations of numerous affairs…the proceedings for Paxton’s divorce are scheduled to be held in OPEN COURT in just four weeks—June…this is…part of why Republicans are now terrified that they could lose this Senate race, and Democrats have the ideal candidate to make their case against Ken Paxton…”😳

#BREAKING: Psaki: “Bad press for #KenPaxton is expected to only get WORSE because Paxton is currently in the middle of a messy divorce from his wife after allegations of numerous affairs…the proceedings for Paxton’s divorce are scheduled to be held in OPEN COURT in just four weeks—June…this is…part of why Republicans are now terrified that they could lose this Senate race, and Democrats have the ideal candidate to make their case against Ken Paxton…”😳

Emoluments Clause

117,921 views • 1 month ago

.Vice President JD Vance: "We are seeing signs that the Straits are starting to reopen... The deal is a ceasefire, a negotiation — that's what we give — and what they give is the Straits are going to be reopened. If we don't see that happening, President Donald J. Trump is not going to abide by our terms if the Iranians are not abiding by their terms."

.Vice President JD Vance: "We are seeing signs that the Straits are starting to reopen... The deal is a ceasefire, a negotiation — that's what we give — and what they give is the Straits are going to be reopened. If we don't see that happening, President Donald J. Trump is not going to abide by our terms if the Iranians are not abiding by their terms."

Rapid Response 47

152,923 views • 2 months ago

Jaques Vallee says the things that are happening in the UFO topic right now are very exciting “there are rumors that something like 12 objects have been captured and they seem to be egg-shaped,” Source -That UFO Podcast 🔗 in comments JV -“things are accelerating. So the things that are happening now are very exciting because people are talking about capturing some of these and, you know, there are rumors that something like 12 objects have been captured and they seem to be egg-shaped, which is interesting because, you know, again, and the trinity in, in our book, all three of the cases were egg-shaped. You know, that's not a new thing, you know, it's a, it's an old thing. So we're going to have a lot of correlations with what people are seeing now with the experiments that are going to be done. If we, we should let the, you know, the special forces guys who go and, you know, look for those things around the world. We should, we should know this, shouldn't stay in a small, you know, small group. Those things should be, should be published and should be discussed openly. And that's a way, yes. We’re going to move a lot faster now,”

Jaques Vallee says the things that are happening in the UFO topic right now are very exciting “there are rumors that something like 12 objects have been captured and they seem to be egg-shaped,” Source -That UFO Podcast 🔗 in comments JV -“things are accelerating. So the things that are happening now are very exciting because people are talking about capturing some of these and, you know, there are rumors that something like 12 objects have been captured and they seem to be egg-shaped, which is interesting because, you know, again, and the trinity in, in our book, all three of the cases were egg-shaped. You know, that's not a new thing, you know, it's a, it's an old thing. So we're going to have a lot of correlations with what people are seeing now with the experiments that are going to be done. If we, we should let the, you know, the special forces guys who go and, you know, look for those things around the world. We should, we should know this, shouldn't stay in a small, you know, small group. Those things should be, should be published and should be discussed openly. And that's a way, yes. We’re going to move a lot faster now,”

neandrewthal

24,571 views • 1 year ago

WATCH: New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor – who wrote many of the #MeToo stories – DEFENDS Graham Platner and DISMISSES the allegations against him by Lyndsey Fifield and other ex-girlfriends because they were not “abuse” and women saying they just “did not like what” they saw from him... “Well, let’s talk about what they may or may not be willing to overlook the accusations against Graham Platner are not classic MeToo accusations. They’re not about a boss and a young female employee being subjected to sexual advances. They’re — they were mostly made in the context of consensual relationships. There are these, like, very sensational texts about sex. There are allegations from former girlfriends that are not — the way my colleagues reported them were not like classic abuse allegations. They were mostly like being his boyfriend gave me a view into him and I did not like what I saw. His character was scary. He had this Nazi tattoo. Et cetera.” “There was one allegation of crossing a line physically, but I think that means that these are pretty different accusations than, say, the one that — the ones that President Trump faced. And, of course, in the Access Hollywood tape, President Trump bragged about grabbing women against their will. And so I think it speaks to the kind of confusion of the long post MeToo moment in which, like, gender related accusations get bundled together. But they’re actually very different.”

WATCH: New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor – who wrote many of the #MeToo stories – DEFENDS Graham Platner and DISMISSES the allegations against him by Lyndsey Fifield and other ex-girlfriends because they were not “abuse” and women saying they just “did not like what” they saw from him... “Well, let’s talk about what they may or may not be willing to overlook the accusations against Graham Platner are not classic MeToo accusations. They’re not about a boss and a young female employee being subjected to sexual advances. They’re — they were mostly made in the context of consensual relationships. There are these, like, very sensational texts about sex. There are allegations from former girlfriends that are not — the way my colleagues reported them were not like classic abuse allegations. They were mostly like being his boyfriend gave me a view into him and I did not like what I saw. His character was scary. He had this Nazi tattoo. Et cetera.” “There was one allegation of crossing a line physically, but I think that means that these are pretty different accusations than, say, the one that — the ones that President Trump faced. And, of course, in the Access Hollywood tape, President Trump bragged about grabbing women against their will. And so I think it speaks to the kind of confusion of the long post MeToo moment in which, like, gender related accusations get bundled together. But they’re actually very different.”

Curtis Houck

961,257 views • 19 days ago