正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

This is why Shermichael Singleton Singleton won the Media Research Center's Bulldog Award for Outstanding Achievement Behind Enemy Lines. Tonight on CNN, he calls out the left for supporting Graham Platner and proving themselves to be "nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars": "I find that a bit ironic. For...

NickFondacaro's profile picture

Nicholas Fondacaro

28,726 subscribers

53,787 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Shermichael Singleton just singlehandedly destroyed the Democrats’ case for their embattled Senate candidate Graham Platner. All he had to do was call out the blatant double standard — and he did it right in the face of Democrat shill Ro Khanna. SINGLETON: “I find that a bit ironic.” “For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation.” “That they were standing up for justice, that they were upholding morality, that they said Trump was an affront to.” “And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade.” “You have this guy who’s saying he’s going to make a speech to draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins.” “He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh.” “Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who’s now the defender of women.” “So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it’s convenient for them.” “But now that there’s a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could out seat Susan Collins, you know what?” “It doesn’t necessarily matter, the ten plus years of arguments we’ve made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who’ve empowered Trump, because we can win a seat.” “It’s very machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void.” “They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars.” “And I think as we get into the general election, you’re going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the nrsc, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are.” “Look at who they’re supporting, the guy with the Nazi tattoo.” Democrats have no moral authority left. Shermichael Singleton
1:24

Shermichael Singleton just singlehandedly destroyed the Democrats’ case for their embattled Senate candidate Graham Platner. All he had to do was call out the blatant double standard — and he did it right in the face of Democrat shill Ro Khanna. SINGLETON: “I find that a bit ironic.” “For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation.” “That they were standing up for justice, that they were upholding morality, that they said Trump was an affront to.” “And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade.” “You have this guy who’s saying he’s going to make a speech to draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins.” “He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh.” “Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who’s now the defender of women.” “So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it’s convenient for them.” “But now that there’s a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could out seat Susan Collins, you know what?” “It doesn’t necessarily matter, the ten plus years of arguments we’ve made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who’ve empowered Trump, because we can win a seat.” “It’s very machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void.” “They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars.” “And I think as we get into the general election, you’re going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the nrsc, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are.” “Look at who they’re supporting, the guy with the Nazi tattoo.” Democrats have no moral authority left. Shermichael Singleton

Overton

136,175 次观看 • 7 天前

.Shermichael Singleton blasts Democrats as hypocrites for backing Graham Platner: "Any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans, it's now null and void. They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars."
1:04

.Shermichael Singleton blasts Democrats as hypocrites for backing Graham Platner: "Any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans, it's now null and void. They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars."

Bobby LaValley

175,052 次观看 • 7 天前

Shermichael Singleton forces the CNN panel to adress the Democrat elephant in the room with their support of Graham Platner. He pointed out their TOTAL hypocrisy of attacking President Trump’s character while propping up a guy with such serious moral issues. SINGLETON: “I think Democrats have ceded whatever moral ground they once upon a time had.” “You can’t make a moral or ethical case against Trump or any other Republican and say, but Susan Collins is so terrible, we’re going to encourage voters in Maine to elect a guy who’s been alleged to have serious physical misconduct against women.” “Now, I’m a dad of a daughter.” “I can’t imagine excusing that type of behavior.” “Now, as a conservative, I’ve called out things on my side, as you know very well.” “And so for me, Congresswoman, I get the premise of your argument, but I just couldn’t in good conscience or faith, say, support some person with these serious allegations.” “You still have the governor...who voters could vote for.” Democrats have lost all moral authority. Shermichael Singleton
0:48

Shermichael Singleton forces the CNN panel to adress the Democrat elephant in the room with their support of Graham Platner. He pointed out their TOTAL hypocrisy of attacking President Trump’s character while propping up a guy with such serious moral issues. SINGLETON: “I think Democrats have ceded whatever moral ground they once upon a time had.” “You can’t make a moral or ethical case against Trump or any other Republican and say, but Susan Collins is so terrible, we’re going to encourage voters in Maine to elect a guy who’s been alleged to have serious physical misconduct against women.” “Now, I’m a dad of a daughter.” “I can’t imagine excusing that type of behavior.” “Now, as a conservative, I’ve called out things on my side, as you know very well.” “And so for me, Congresswoman, I get the premise of your argument, but I just couldn’t in good conscience or faith, say, support some person with these serious allegations.” “You still have the governor...who voters could vote for.” Democrats have lost all moral authority. Shermichael Singleton

Overton

111,016 次观看 • 10 天前

Asmongold explains why Graham Platner is one of the "most beneficial" things that could have happened to the Republicans "I think Graham Platner is actually great for the Democrats..he completely destroys their moral high ground against Trump..really great so many of them are rallying around" "I think that to a certain extent that they did have a point that Donald Trump..bad actor in a lot of ways..but none of that matters whenever they're defending ppl that are doing things that are equivalent" "I would say middle of the road ppl care about it (Platner's allegations)..it is still a point that they had..Biden for all of his faults was not anywhere near as morally ambiguous as Donald Trump was" "Keep this in mind whenever they want to disqualify anybody for being racist or saying some sort of other bad stuff..all of their morality is performative..this is one the most beneficial things that could have ever happened to Republicans..now it shows and reveals how completely hypocritical Democrats are"
2:03

Asmongold explains why Graham Platner is one of the "most beneficial" things that could have happened to the Republicans "I think Graham Platner is actually great for the Democrats..he completely destroys their moral high ground against Trump..really great so many of them are rallying around" "I think that to a certain extent that they did have a point that Donald Trump..bad actor in a lot of ways..but none of that matters whenever they're defending ppl that are doing things that are equivalent" "I would say middle of the road ppl care about it (Platner's allegations)..it is still a point that they had..Biden for all of his faults was not anywhere near as morally ambiguous as Donald Trump was" "Keep this in mind whenever they want to disqualify anybody for being racist or saying some sort of other bad stuff..all of their morality is performative..this is one the most beneficial things that could have ever happened to Republicans..now it shows and reveals how completely hypocritical Democrats are"

yeet

25,044 次观看 • 5 天前

Devin Nunes explains various charges that are likely to be brought against Comey and company "On Comey, the answer is for this, it's very specific, and it's over whether or not he lied on this one part. The larger part is whether or not you can bring a Grand Conspiracy case. And there's the law, which is, lying to Congress, lying to the FBI, but there's also a term in there called misleading. And what a lot of these guys did is they made up things using intelligence that didn't exist, but acted like they knew something that actually wasn't there, and they lied and misled the American people. And by doing that, all the times they testified before Congress, the Senate, they lied over and over and again with this, oh, we've seen something, we can't tell you about it because it's classified. But what do we now know by everything that's been declassified is, is that they didn't have any intelligence on Russia colluding with Trump. In fact, the only intelligence that they had is that the Russians were very well aware of Clinton's plan. And they actually not only thought Clinton was going to win, but likely preferred that she would win. So going back to the cover up of her missing emails that, by the way, are still missing, they all got involved in this plan. They all got the FBI exercise. They were able to go spy on the Trump campaign. They were able to then get the Mueller witch hunt going, that then led to the Ukraine. Remember, that dies off, then you have the fake whistleblower and the Ukraine impeachment. I mean, that means a whole investigation in and of itself. We now know the latest information that happened on January 6th now with agents that were out there, the pipe bombs, all this other stuff that is, who broke the windows that I asked when I was in Congress, I really wanted to know that. But most importantly, Maria, who's the victim in this? The victim is President Trump and his family. They raided Mar-a-Lago. That's a problem and we need answers to that
1:58

Devin Nunes explains various charges that are likely to be brought against Comey and company "On Comey, the answer is for this, it's very specific, and it's over whether or not he lied on this one part. The larger part is whether or not you can bring a Grand Conspiracy case. And there's the law, which is, lying to Congress, lying to the FBI, but there's also a term in there called misleading. And what a lot of these guys did is they made up things using intelligence that didn't exist, but acted like they knew something that actually wasn't there, and they lied and misled the American people. And by doing that, all the times they testified before Congress, the Senate, they lied over and over and again with this, oh, we've seen something, we can't tell you about it because it's classified. But what do we now know by everything that's been declassified is, is that they didn't have any intelligence on Russia colluding with Trump. In fact, the only intelligence that they had is that the Russians were very well aware of Clinton's plan. And they actually not only thought Clinton was going to win, but likely preferred that she would win. So going back to the cover up of her missing emails that, by the way, are still missing, they all got involved in this plan. They all got the FBI exercise. They were able to go spy on the Trump campaign. They were able to then get the Mueller witch hunt going, that then led to the Ukraine. Remember, that dies off, then you have the fake whistleblower and the Ukraine impeachment. I mean, that means a whole investigation in and of itself. We now know the latest information that happened on January 6th now with agents that were out there, the pipe bombs, all this other stuff that is, who broke the windows that I asked when I was in Congress, I really wanted to know that. But most importantly, Maria, who's the victim in this? The victim is President Trump and his family. They raided Mar-a-Lago. That's a problem and we need answers to that

Svetlana Lokhova

25,150 次观看 • 8 个月前

"Now, some of us have longer memories than others. So, dear regulars, who remembers when nobody apart from Trump as president in his first term was calling for justice against Epstein and all his clients? Who remembers when the Democrats, the very same Democrats who are now saying that Trump didn't want to release these files because he was supposedly implicated, who remembers when those same Democrats used to call a global VIP pedophile ring nothing but a conspiracy theory? And yet here we are now, interestingly, with all the people that used to call it a conspiracy theory, instead now saying: no longer is it not a conspiracy theory, it’s the worst case of global VIP pedophilia in history. And, they’re saying, it's all Trump's fault and they're and they're demanding the release of all the information. So, certainly got your interest now, haven't we? So perhaps the Democrats took the bait that President Trump laid for them all along. Point being, it doesn't make too much of a difference whether he did it on purpose or not, President Trump - by making the Democrats believe that he had something to hide - made them demand the release of the files. And then, of course, Trump was only happy to oblige." Maajid Nawaz, WARRIOR CREED.
1:22

"Now, some of us have longer memories than others. So, dear regulars, who remembers when nobody apart from Trump as president in his first term was calling for justice against Epstein and all his clients? Who remembers when the Democrats, the very same Democrats who are now saying that Trump didn't want to release these files because he was supposedly implicated, who remembers when those same Democrats used to call a global VIP pedophile ring nothing but a conspiracy theory? And yet here we are now, interestingly, with all the people that used to call it a conspiracy theory, instead now saying: no longer is it not a conspiracy theory, it’s the worst case of global VIP pedophilia in history. And, they’re saying, it's all Trump's fault and they're and they're demanding the release of all the information. So, certainly got your interest now, haven't we? So perhaps the Democrats took the bait that President Trump laid for them all along. Point being, it doesn't make too much of a difference whether he did it on purpose or not, President Trump - by making the Democrats believe that he had something to hide - made them demand the release of the files. And then, of course, Trump was only happy to oblige." Maajid Nawaz, WARRIOR CREED.

أبو عمّار

41,686 次观看 • 6 个月前

Batya Ungar-Sargon on Tennessee’s 7th District special election: “Even if the Republicans win, it's already a disaster because they lost a 20-point lead. And I think the reason for that is because we've seen this real political realignment. It used to be that the Republicans were the party of the rich and the Democrats were party of labor.” “And we know that rich people turn out more to vote. They're much more engaged. They're high propensity voters. Now, Republicans represent the majority of working class Americans and low propensity voters and the Democrats represent the majority of rich Americans and educated Americans who are much more likely to turn out certainly on off-year elections.” “The Republicans absolutely need to understand this. It's everything you said. They need candidates who care about them, who show up and speak about the issues that matter to them the way that Donald Trump did because the Democrats now have that advantage built in which is the advantage of representing very wealthy Americans.” Abby Phillip: “And not to mention that I don't know that it's going to be enough to tell the people that she hates country music.”
1:12

Batya Ungar-Sargon on Tennessee’s 7th District special election: “Even if the Republicans win, it's already a disaster because they lost a 20-point lead. And I think the reason for that is because we've seen this real political realignment. It used to be that the Republicans were the party of the rich and the Democrats were party of labor.” “And we know that rich people turn out more to vote. They're much more engaged. They're high propensity voters. Now, Republicans represent the majority of working class Americans and low propensity voters and the Democrats represent the majority of rich Americans and educated Americans who are much more likely to turn out certainly on off-year elections.” “The Republicans absolutely need to understand this. It's everything you said. They need candidates who care about them, who show up and speak about the issues that matter to them the way that Donald Trump did because the Democrats now have that advantage built in which is the advantage of representing very wealthy Americans.” Abby Phillip: “And not to mention that I don't know that it's going to be enough to tell the people that she hates country music.”

RedWave Press

185,973 次观看 • 6 个月前

Joe Rogan: “There's a lot of people that don't speak their mind.” “Do you know how many artists like musicians/comedians that thanked me for endorsing Trump because they can't do it.” “They said they want to, but they don't wanna be attacked. They can't say it. They think the country is going in the wrong direction.” “Trump has vowed to have free speech become a very important part of what he's standing for and that this censoring of information needs to stop and that we need to stop all government influence in what people have to say.”
1:20

Joe Rogan: “There's a lot of people that don't speak their mind.” “Do you know how many artists like musicians/comedians that thanked me for endorsing Trump because they can't do it.” “They said they want to, but they don't wanna be attacked. They can't say it. They think the country is going in the wrong direction.” “Trump has vowed to have free speech become a very important part of what he's standing for and that this censoring of information needs to stop and that we need to stop all government influence in what people have to say.”

End Tribalism in Politics

14,467,094 次观看 • 1 年前

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “One on Iran and one on Cuba. Is Iran now bigger foreign policy priority for you than China and on Cuba — the Cuban government —” President Trump: “Iran is just a military operation. To me, Iran is something that was essentially largely over in two or three days because the Navy was wiped out almost immediately. The air force came next, the anti-aircraft came next. I mean, we're flying over Iran. We could take out their electric capacity in one hour. We have all the there's nothing they can do right now because everything is knocked out. They have no — again, no radar, no anti-aircraft. They have nothing, and we don't — and it was a decision I made. We discussed it. Pete, Marco, JD all of us, Chris. We discussed it. We can knock out their electricity in a matter of minutes if we wanted to. There's nothing they can do about it. We can knock out their oil in Kharg Island. The only thing we didn't take down was the oil. Because if we knock out, I call them the pipes. Very complex. But if you do that, it will take them forever to rebuild, meaning whoever — and hopefully it's a sane group of people, but whoever it is, it's going to be running that, and we're going to try to get people that are going to run it well. And you know, it's going to be a prosperous, wonderful place. It used to be, you know, if you go back, it used to be a very — the people are great. The people are smart and energetic and it used to be very successful. Now, it's a country run by fear. It's a country where they tell protesters, don't go outside, because if you do, we're going to kill you....Well, Cuba right now is in very bad shape. They're talking to Marco, and we'll be doing something with Cuba very soon. We're really focused on this, but we're dealing with Cuba. Marco, do you want to say a couple of words about it?” Secretary of State Rubio: “Yeah. I mean, Cuba has an economy that doesn't work and a political and governmental system. They can't fix it. It's not dramatic enough. It's not going to fix it, so they've got some big decisions to make over there.” Gutierrez: “But Secretary — Secretary Rubio, do you support and I know this is up to Congress, but do you support easing the Cuban trade embargo if you get more cooperation from Havana?” Rubio: “Well, I'm not going to discuss what we would talk about or not. Suffice it to say that the embargo is tied to political change on the island. The law has been the embargo is codified. And — but the bottom line is their economy doesn't work. It's a nonfunctional economy. It's an economy that has survived. It's for 40 — that revolution — it's not even a revolution, that thing they have — has survived on subsidies from the Soviet Union and now from Venezuela. They don't get subsidies anymore, so they're in a lot of trouble. And the people in charge are — they don't know how to fix it, so they have to get new people in charge. That's what happened.” Trump: “And the relationship we have with Venezuela has been, I think you could almost say, incredible. It's been really good. It's been good for Venezuela and it's been good for us. And I congratulate the Venezuelan baseball team because that was a big — that was a big win. And I guess they play another game tonight in the finals.” Rubio: “Against the U.S.” Trump: “And I said a lot of good things have happened to Venezuela lately. This is the first time they've ever been in the finals, and it was pretty exciting.
3:27

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “One on Iran and one on Cuba. Is Iran now bigger foreign policy priority for you than China and on Cuba — the Cuban government —” President Trump: “Iran is just a military operation. To me, Iran is something that was essentially largely over in two or three days because the Navy was wiped out almost immediately. The air force came next, the anti-aircraft came next. I mean, we're flying over Iran. We could take out their electric capacity in one hour. We have all the there's nothing they can do right now because everything is knocked out. They have no — again, no radar, no anti-aircraft. They have nothing, and we don't — and it was a decision I made. We discussed it. Pete, Marco, JD all of us, Chris. We discussed it. We can knock out their electricity in a matter of minutes if we wanted to. There's nothing they can do about it. We can knock out their oil in Kharg Island. The only thing we didn't take down was the oil. Because if we knock out, I call them the pipes. Very complex. But if you do that, it will take them forever to rebuild, meaning whoever — and hopefully it's a sane group of people, but whoever it is, it's going to be running that, and we're going to try to get people that are going to run it well. And you know, it's going to be a prosperous, wonderful place. It used to be, you know, if you go back, it used to be a very — the people are great. The people are smart and energetic and it used to be very successful. Now, it's a country run by fear. It's a country where they tell protesters, don't go outside, because if you do, we're going to kill you....Well, Cuba right now is in very bad shape. They're talking to Marco, and we'll be doing something with Cuba very soon. We're really focused on this, but we're dealing with Cuba. Marco, do you want to say a couple of words about it?” Secretary of State Rubio: “Yeah. I mean, Cuba has an economy that doesn't work and a political and governmental system. They can't fix it. It's not dramatic enough. It's not going to fix it, so they've got some big decisions to make over there.” Gutierrez: “But Secretary — Secretary Rubio, do you support and I know this is up to Congress, but do you support easing the Cuban trade embargo if you get more cooperation from Havana?” Rubio: “Well, I'm not going to discuss what we would talk about or not. Suffice it to say that the embargo is tied to political change on the island. The law has been the embargo is codified. And — but the bottom line is their economy doesn't work. It's a nonfunctional economy. It's an economy that has survived. It's for 40 — that revolution — it's not even a revolution, that thing they have — has survived on subsidies from the Soviet Union and now from Venezuela. They don't get subsidies anymore, so they're in a lot of trouble. And the people in charge are — they don't know how to fix it, so they have to get new people in charge. That's what happened.” Trump: “And the relationship we have with Venezuela has been, I think you could almost say, incredible. It's been really good. It's been good for Venezuela and it's been good for us. And I congratulate the Venezuelan baseball team because that was a big — that was a big win. And I guess they play another game tonight in the finals.” Rubio: “Against the U.S.” Trump: “And I said a lot of good things have happened to Venezuela lately. This is the first time they've ever been in the finals, and it was pretty exciting.

Curtis Houck

175,437 次观看 • 3 个月前

Reporter: What do you make of Republicans saying that Virginia— AOC: Wah wah wah. We have asked Republicans for 10 years to ban partisan gerrymandering. And for 10 years, Republicans have said no. Republicans have fought for partisan gerrymanders across the United States of America. And these are the rules that they have set. And so if the Republican Party wanted to start this, they did this in North Carolina. They drew out three Democratic members of Congress in North Carolina. They did it in Texas. What they’re just mad at is that they have been accustomed to a Democratic Party that rolls over, doesn’t fight, and takes everything sitting down. And what they’re mad at right now is that we are here in a new day. And we have been asking the Democratic Party to stand up and fight, and now they did—and now the Republican Party doesn’t like the fact that they are fighting against someone who actually will stand up for the American people. So if Republicans decide that they would like to revisit a ban on partisan gerrymandering, I welcome them. We have the bill right here to end this all today. But they don’t want to, because they like pursuing and continuing to enact an unfair electoral landscape. And so we have an obligation to defend ourselves.
1:34

Reporter: What do you make of Republicans saying that Virginia— AOC: Wah wah wah. We have asked Republicans for 10 years to ban partisan gerrymandering. And for 10 years, Republicans have said no. Republicans have fought for partisan gerrymanders across the United States of America. And these are the rules that they have set. And so if the Republican Party wanted to start this, they did this in North Carolina. They drew out three Democratic members of Congress in North Carolina. They did it in Texas. What they’re just mad at is that they have been accustomed to a Democratic Party that rolls over, doesn’t fight, and takes everything sitting down. And what they’re mad at right now is that we are here in a new day. And we have been asking the Democratic Party to stand up and fight, and now they did—and now the Republican Party doesn’t like the fact that they are fighting against someone who actually will stand up for the American people. So if Republicans decide that they would like to revisit a ban on partisan gerrymandering, I welcome them. We have the bill right here to end this all today. But they don’t want to, because they like pursuing and continuing to enact an unfair electoral landscape. And so we have an obligation to defend ourselves.

Acyn

2,318,390 次观看 • 1 个月前

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”
0:48

CNN was just forced to read on air why the Georgia prosecutor dropped the entire election case against President Trump. And their viewers are not going to like what they heard...especially the part where he said: “contesting an election is not unlawful.” A direct hit to the narrative they have been peddling for years. “He is saying that they are not going to move forward with this case.” “And he summarized it in part by saying that he made this decision by examining the case file, examining what the jury had been presented, and also considerations of the law.” “You know, he says that, you know, contesting an election is not unlawful. But, you know, and that is part of the reasons for why he decided not to move forward with the charges at this point.”

Overton

1,057,581 次观看 • 6 个月前

Dear Lexxie (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)... (May I call you Lexxie? You can call me Dev. ) We probably wouldn't get along very well. I'm a throw-the-communists-out-of-helicopters anarchocapitalist, and that's probably too big a political gap to bridge with a few interpersonal gestures. However, like each other or not, I'm going to assume you are asking in good faith, and I'm going to answer you. I'm not going to answer your exact question, though. It's the wrong question. An answer wouldn't get you the information I think you are actually looking for. It looks like you're assuming that the neo-republican "MAGA" movement works like a traditional campaign. You develop a message about how your platform will be good for people, and your opponent's platform will be bad for them, then you get that message out on various channels, and it persuades some people to vote for you. That's definitely how democrats work. You are the party of television. And it's how old, pre-2015 republicans worked, too. You know, all those guys like Romney, who have been exiled to the wilderness, or, in the case of Cheney, have joined the democrats. MAGA doesn't work like that. We didn't vote for Trump because he persuaded us by getting XYZ message out on the UVW channel. We voted for Trump because we were waiting for someone like Trump to come along, so we could vote for him. That's why Trump didn't really have to do much of anything to beat you. He just had to position himself as the anti-establishment candidate, then get out of the way and let things happen, without making any major mistakes. The field was primed for him before he ever announced that he would run. Why? Because of one key insight that I don't think democrats have ever had. Elections are not about policy. They are not about personality. They are not about experience. They are not about charisma. Elections are about trust. Trump was elected in a landslide in 2016, 2024, and probably 2020 as well if you discard all the fake ballots, because more people trusted him, and less people trusted Clinton, Biden, or Harris. If you think about it, it's really pretty obvious that trust is the only issue that matters. Here's an example. Democrats campaigned against Trump by pounding on the abortion issue and cosplaying as fictional sex slaves from a kink novel for lonely cat ladies. And it worked with your base. Despite the fact that Trump had released a public statement that he would veto any national level restrictions on abortion, and that it was the Supreme Court, not he, who had overturned Roe-Wade in the first place, not even on ideological grounds, but because it was bad lawyering. Why did it work? Because those people didn't trust Trump. So anything he said about his intentions on the abortion issue was meaningless to them. It's all about trust. So why did more people trust Trump? And why do I say they were waiting to vote for him before he even came along? Because trust in Trump is rooted in distrust of the Machine. The Machine is the system of informal, unacknowledged relationships between people who have clout in the federal government and use it to benefit themselves, to benefit each other, and to protect their power base from outsiders. In other words, the federal government is corrupt, and the majority of Americans know it. Resist the temptation to argue with me here, even inside your own head. We are talking about why people voted for Trump. It's important what they believe, not whether you agree with them. Now, I could go on all day with examples of the Machine, and its fairly obvious abuse of power and funds. I could talk about fake vaccines that turned out to be neither safe nor effective, which made a lot of money for people who are vaccinated against any liability by your own organization... Congress. But that would sidetrack us, because you'd succumb to the temptation to argue about each one, and it's not important whether you agree. What's important, once again, is what the majority of Americans agree on. They agree on the existence of a Machine. They agree that the Machine has political influence which does not come from the "just consent of the governed". They agree that the Machine is materially harming them by enacting policies which hurt them. They agree that the Machine is materially harming them by spending their money on things that are not in their interest. They agree that the Machine is materially harming them by failing to faithfully carry out the actual duties of the federal government. They hate and distrust the Machine. All of this has nothing to with Trump, because all of this became true before Trump announced he was running. As I said, people were waiting for a Trump they could vote for. This is why. But how did distrust in the Machine translate into trust in Trump? Simple. Because Trump is the enemy of the Machine. How do we know that? Simple. It's not just because Trump told us so. If it were merely Trump telling us so, he could have been lying. We know Trump is the enemy of the Machine, because the Machine told us so. We saw how desperate the Machine was to convince us that Trump was an icky superplusungood double-Nazi, when his actual platform was just straight-up 1960s democrat, John Kennedy style. We saw them hurling accusation after accusation, as if they were throwing pasta at the wall, seeing what would stick. We saw the press elements of the Machine continuing to hold to those accusations, long after they had been proven to not just be false, but to be deliberate lies. Every time the Machine told us that Trump was horrible, all it did was confirm what Trump was telling us... that he intended to fight the Machine. In 2016, that was enough to get him elected. Check the video below. Michael Moore was the only person who understood this in 2016. Thing is he understood Trump voters, but not Trump. He thought a Trump presidency would be disastrous. Turned that nothing much happened at all. The Machine fought him more or less to a standstill, and the only major way he moved the needle was in putting three constitutionalists on the Supreme Court. Now, that's no small feat. Helped us a lot, and will for years to come. But the border security system didn't get finished, Mexico didn't pay for it, etc. Thing is, that's not important. What's important is why. We saw the fight between Trump and the Machine. It wasn't about whether he could beat the Machine or not. It was the fact that he willing to fight it, and the fact that we could see the fight. And that proved that his intentions were at least partially what he said they were. In 2024, he looks a lot more prepared, and has a team of heavy hitters backing him But there's one more set of questions to ask, here. Why did Trump run as a republican? Why is it Democrats, in particular, who are identified with the Machine? Well, the easy answer is that you keep running Machine candidates. Obama looked like an outsider, but he integrated into the Machine with great enthusiasm the microsecond he took office. Clinton and Biden were personifications of the Machine. Harris was the same, only dumber. But the deeper answer is that democrats have been in power for 12 of the past 16 years. And what y'all chose to do with that time was expand the Machine and integrate yourselves with it for ego-gratification and profit. Again, resist the impulse to argue. We may be at a disadvantage against you because we don't sign the paychecks of a legion of armed thugs, but that doesn't make us somehow dumber than you, or oblivious to what's going on. We know what "Ten percent for the big guy" means. And we don't stop knowing it when Comrade Squealer gets on MSNBC and launches some convoluted deflection filled with mental gymnastics we aren't morally flexible enough to replicate. Now, you, Lexxie, can argue that you're not a part of that. Maybe it would even be true. Or partially true. Maybe, through the awesome power of wishful thinking and historical ignorance, you actually are a sincere socialist, who thinks that statist, collectivist policies will actually benefit people, rather than just provide politicians with opportunities to steal and ruin people's live with a stroke of the pen out of sheer sadism. But you're not asking why you lost. You didn't lose. Harris lost. You're asking why Harris lost. Harris lost because we are aware of the Machine, and we don't like it. Trump is just our plan A to dismantle it. Let's all just hope we don't have to go to plan B. Plan B wouldn't be fun for anybody.
4:30

Dear Lexxie (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)... (May I call you Lexxie? You can call me Dev. ) We probably wouldn't get along very well. I'm a throw-the-communists-out-of-helicopters anarchocapitalist, and that's probably too big a political gap to bridge with a few interpersonal gestures. However, like each other or not, I'm going to assume you are asking in good faith, and I'm going to answer you. I'm not going to answer your exact question, though. It's the wrong question. An answer wouldn't get you the information I think you are actually looking for. It looks like you're assuming that the neo-republican "MAGA" movement works like a traditional campaign. You develop a message about how your platform will be good for people, and your opponent's platform will be bad for them, then you get that message out on various channels, and it persuades some people to vote for you. That's definitely how democrats work. You are the party of television. And it's how old, pre-2015 republicans worked, too. You know, all those guys like Romney, who have been exiled to the wilderness, or, in the case of Cheney, have joined the democrats. MAGA doesn't work like that. We didn't vote for Trump because he persuaded us by getting XYZ message out on the UVW channel. We voted for Trump because we were waiting for someone like Trump to come along, so we could vote for him. That's why Trump didn't really have to do much of anything to beat you. He just had to position himself as the anti-establishment candidate, then get out of the way and let things happen, without making any major mistakes. The field was primed for him before he ever announced that he would run. Why? Because of one key insight that I don't think democrats have ever had. Elections are not about policy. They are not about personality. They are not about experience. They are not about charisma. Elections are about trust. Trump was elected in a landslide in 2016, 2024, and probably 2020 as well if you discard all the fake ballots, because more people trusted him, and less people trusted Clinton, Biden, or Harris. If you think about it, it's really pretty obvious that trust is the only issue that matters. Here's an example. Democrats campaigned against Trump by pounding on the abortion issue and cosplaying as fictional sex slaves from a kink novel for lonely cat ladies. And it worked with your base. Despite the fact that Trump had released a public statement that he would veto any national level restrictions on abortion, and that it was the Supreme Court, not he, who had overturned Roe-Wade in the first place, not even on ideological grounds, but because it was bad lawyering. Why did it work? Because those people didn't trust Trump. So anything he said about his intentions on the abortion issue was meaningless to them. It's all about trust. So why did more people trust Trump? And why do I say they were waiting to vote for him before he even came along? Because trust in Trump is rooted in distrust of the Machine. The Machine is the system of informal, unacknowledged relationships between people who have clout in the federal government and use it to benefit themselves, to benefit each other, and to protect their power base from outsiders. In other words, the federal government is corrupt, and the majority of Americans know it. Resist the temptation to argue with me here, even inside your own head. We are talking about why people voted for Trump. It's important what they believe, not whether you agree with them. Now, I could go on all day with examples of the Machine, and its fairly obvious abuse of power and funds. I could talk about fake vaccines that turned out to be neither safe nor effective, which made a lot of money for people who are vaccinated against any liability by your own organization... Congress. But that would sidetrack us, because you'd succumb to the temptation to argue about each one, and it's not important whether you agree. What's important, once again, is what the majority of Americans agree on. They agree on the existence of a Machine. They agree that the Machine has political influence which does not come from the "just consent of the governed". They agree that the Machine is materially harming them by enacting policies which hurt them. They agree that the Machine is materially harming them by spending their money on things that are not in their interest. They agree that the Machine is materially harming them by failing to faithfully carry out the actual duties of the federal government. They hate and distrust the Machine. All of this has nothing to with Trump, because all of this became true before Trump announced he was running. As I said, people were waiting for a Trump they could vote for. This is why. But how did distrust in the Machine translate into trust in Trump? Simple. Because Trump is the enemy of the Machine. How do we know that? Simple. It's not just because Trump told us so. If it were merely Trump telling us so, he could have been lying. We know Trump is the enemy of the Machine, because the Machine told us so. We saw how desperate the Machine was to convince us that Trump was an icky superplusungood double-Nazi, when his actual platform was just straight-up 1960s democrat, John Kennedy style. We saw them hurling accusation after accusation, as if they were throwing pasta at the wall, seeing what would stick. We saw the press elements of the Machine continuing to hold to those accusations, long after they had been proven to not just be false, but to be deliberate lies. Every time the Machine told us that Trump was horrible, all it did was confirm what Trump was telling us... that he intended to fight the Machine. In 2016, that was enough to get him elected. Check the video below. Michael Moore was the only person who understood this in 2016. Thing is he understood Trump voters, but not Trump. He thought a Trump presidency would be disastrous. Turned that nothing much happened at all. The Machine fought him more or less to a standstill, and the only major way he moved the needle was in putting three constitutionalists on the Supreme Court. Now, that's no small feat. Helped us a lot, and will for years to come. But the border security system didn't get finished, Mexico didn't pay for it, etc. Thing is, that's not important. What's important is why. We saw the fight between Trump and the Machine. It wasn't about whether he could beat the Machine or not. It was the fact that he willing to fight it, and the fact that we could see the fight. And that proved that his intentions were at least partially what he said they were. In 2024, he looks a lot more prepared, and has a team of heavy hitters backing him But there's one more set of questions to ask, here. Why did Trump run as a republican? Why is it Democrats, in particular, who are identified with the Machine? Well, the easy answer is that you keep running Machine candidates. Obama looked like an outsider, but he integrated into the Machine with great enthusiasm the microsecond he took office. Clinton and Biden were personifications of the Machine. Harris was the same, only dumber. But the deeper answer is that democrats have been in power for 12 of the past 16 years. And what y'all chose to do with that time was expand the Machine and integrate yourselves with it for ego-gratification and profit. Again, resist the impulse to argue. We may be at a disadvantage against you because we don't sign the paychecks of a legion of armed thugs, but that doesn't make us somehow dumber than you, or oblivious to what's going on. We know what "Ten percent for the big guy" means. And we don't stop knowing it when Comrade Squealer gets on MSNBC and launches some convoluted deflection filled with mental gymnastics we aren't morally flexible enough to replicate. Now, you, Lexxie, can argue that you're not a part of that. Maybe it would even be true. Or partially true. Maybe, through the awesome power of wishful thinking and historical ignorance, you actually are a sincere socialist, who thinks that statist, collectivist policies will actually benefit people, rather than just provide politicians with opportunities to steal and ruin people's live with a stroke of the pen out of sheer sadism. But you're not asking why you lost. You didn't lose. Harris lost. You're asking why Harris lost. Harris lost because we are aware of the Machine, and we don't like it. Trump is just our plan A to dismantle it. Let's all just hope we don't have to go to plan B. Plan B wouldn't be fun for anybody.

Devon Eriksen

477,128 次观看 • 1 年前

Scott Jennings just NUKED the entire premise of the ‘No Kings’ rally and defended Trump’s memetic warfare. Scott Jennings dismantled it so brutally that Democrat panelist Karen Finney could do nothing but make faces at him. “Why shouldn’t the president use a made up video to respond to a rally that has a made up reason?” “I mean, it’s a nonexistent reason. We don’t have a monarchy in this country.” “We have a presidency, won by Donald Trump, who won the popular vote, who won the electoral college, who won all the swing states.” “We have a democracy. People voted and they elected the president.” “And the only thing they’re mad about is that he is lawfully executing the office of the presidency and enforcing laws that have been on the books for a long time.” “So he made up a video. They made up a reason to have a rally. And I think it was kind of funny, to be honest with you.”
0:38

Scott Jennings just NUKED the entire premise of the ‘No Kings’ rally and defended Trump’s memetic warfare. Scott Jennings dismantled it so brutally that Democrat panelist Karen Finney could do nothing but make faces at him. “Why shouldn’t the president use a made up video to respond to a rally that has a made up reason?” “I mean, it’s a nonexistent reason. We don’t have a monarchy in this country.” “We have a presidency, won by Donald Trump, who won the popular vote, who won the electoral college, who won all the swing states.” “We have a democracy. People voted and they elected the president.” “And the only thing they’re mad about is that he is lawfully executing the office of the presidency and enforcing laws that have been on the books for a long time.” “So he made up a video. They made up a reason to have a rally. And I think it was kind of funny, to be honest with you.”

Overton

148,198 次观看 • 7 个月前

NEW: Sage Steele says what millions are thinking—the Democrats have “lost their mind.” And voters are fed up with the party of “We hate whatever Trump does.” “They seem to have kind of lost their mind. Instead of focusing on what can make their party better, bring them back, they’re going nuts on other things. And to me, that is very, very telling. I think for years, the Democrats took for granted that people were just going to believe them…” —Sage Steele Now, no one trusts the Democrats OR the media that lies for them. Seems like a very bad spot to be in.
1:31

NEW: Sage Steele says what millions are thinking—the Democrats have “lost their mind.” And voters are fed up with the party of “We hate whatever Trump does.” “They seem to have kind of lost their mind. Instead of focusing on what can make their party better, bring them back, they’re going nuts on other things. And to me, that is very, very telling. I think for years, the Democrats took for granted that people were just going to believe them…” —Sage Steele Now, no one trusts the Democrats OR the media that lies for them. Seems like a very bad spot to be in.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

143,415 次观看 • 1 年前

Karoline Leavitt says President Trump exposed Democrats in real time, arguing their refusal to stand for victims showed a clear choice between common sense leadership and radical opposition: “President Trump set the Democrats up in a trap, and they fell right into it because they cannot help themselves. They truly stand on the side of the tens of millions of illegal aliens whom they allowed to pour into our nation’s open borders under the Biden administration. It was so despicable to be in that chamber and to watch as these Democrats really did show their true colors. But to your point, the president—it was a brilliant idea. It was his idea to put that into the speech, and it proved to be right because he wanted the American people to know that this is a choice between common sense and President Trump and Republicans, and crazy, radical Democrats who stand for nothing except being against Donald Trump.”
1:22

Karoline Leavitt says President Trump exposed Democrats in real time, arguing their refusal to stand for victims showed a clear choice between common sense leadership and radical opposition: “President Trump set the Democrats up in a trap, and they fell right into it because they cannot help themselves. They truly stand on the side of the tens of millions of illegal aliens whom they allowed to pour into our nation’s open borders under the Biden administration. It was so despicable to be in that chamber and to watch as these Democrats really did show their true colors. But to your point, the president—it was a brilliant idea. It was his idea to put that into the speech, and it proved to be right because he wanted the American people to know that this is a choice between common sense and President Trump and Republicans, and crazy, radical Democrats who stand for nothing except being against Donald Trump.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

339,803 次观看 • 3 个月前

WATCH: CNN’s Shermichael Singleton Singleton goes postal on the Hunter Biden pardon, saying this “facade” President Biden and Democrats created as “this great arbiter of morality and truth...protecting norms and institutions of our country” has proven to be utter “trash”... “Democrats portrayed the President as this great arbiter of morality and truth. They said that he somehow was a better standard bearer for protecting norms and institutions of our country and yet, that wasn't true. They lied. You can go all the way back to 2022 when they were asked this question and the White House continuously, consecutively lied over and over and over again. They could have simply said to MJ's point, to Chuck's point, the President isn't going to put his thumb on the scales of justice. He's going to wait. He hasn't made a decision yet. Most people would have expected that. They would have respected that. I think most people, to your point, Chuck, believed if it was my child, I probably would have done the same thing. That's not the issue, Jake. The question here, the burden on the White House, I would argue, is the continuous lies. You said that you were better than this other guy. You criticized the other guy for all of these things. And now, your DOJ is committing witch hunts and this is now politicized, where you appointed Merrick Garland. You can't blame Republicans for that and I can only imagine, as I've talked to a lot of Republicans, if this were Donald Trump and I know people are going to give him a lot of criticism for the pardons he's already given, but if this were him and Don Jr. or Eric Trump or Ivanka, I can only imagine what the headlines would have been. And I will say, if you're Democrats and you're trying to walk this straight line, that we're somehow better than Republicans because we care more about the future and state of this democracy, I think that's — that's — that's — that's trash now, no one believes it. No one believes it. They've lost all credibility for the facade they portrayed for several years.”
1:31

WATCH: CNN’s Shermichael Singleton Singleton goes postal on the Hunter Biden pardon, saying this “facade” President Biden and Democrats created as “this great arbiter of morality and truth...protecting norms and institutions of our country” has proven to be utter “trash”... “Democrats portrayed the President as this great arbiter of morality and truth. They said that he somehow was a better standard bearer for protecting norms and institutions of our country and yet, that wasn't true. They lied. You can go all the way back to 2022 when they were asked this question and the White House continuously, consecutively lied over and over and over again. They could have simply said to MJ's point, to Chuck's point, the President isn't going to put his thumb on the scales of justice. He's going to wait. He hasn't made a decision yet. Most people would have expected that. They would have respected that. I think most people, to your point, Chuck, believed if it was my child, I probably would have done the same thing. That's not the issue, Jake. The question here, the burden on the White House, I would argue, is the continuous lies. You said that you were better than this other guy. You criticized the other guy for all of these things. And now, your DOJ is committing witch hunts and this is now politicized, where you appointed Merrick Garland. You can't blame Republicans for that and I can only imagine, as I've talked to a lot of Republicans, if this were Donald Trump and I know people are going to give him a lot of criticism for the pardons he's already given, but if this were him and Don Jr. or Eric Trump or Ivanka, I can only imagine what the headlines would have been. And I will say, if you're Democrats and you're trying to walk this straight line, that we're somehow better than Republicans because we care more about the future and state of this democracy, I think that's — that's — that's — that's trash now, no one believes it. No one believes it. They've lost all credibility for the facade they portrayed for several years.”

Curtis Houck

745,585 次观看 • 1 年前

James Carville on Graham Platner: “Maybe we need a combat veteran on that Senate who is fucked up. Who every time these assholes go to vote for another war, Susan Collins voted for all of them, maybe they need to look at this guy before they start sending young people off to fight wars and see what the consequence of it is”
1:16

James Carville on Graham Platner: “Maybe we need a combat veteran on that Senate who is fucked up. Who every time these assholes go to vote for another war, Susan Collins voted for all of them, maybe they need to look at this guy before they start sending young people off to fight wars and see what the consequence of it is”

Marco Foster

97,698 次观看 • 11 天前

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”
2:36

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”

Curtis Houck

108,507 次观看 • 2 个月前