Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Democrats are making something clear: if concerns about a candidate are legitimate, they should be addressed. But we are not going to be lectured by the party of Donald Trump, Ken Paxton, or other Republicans who have been accused of things like putting boiling water on their wives during... show more

Jessica Tarlov

296,402 subscribers

395,928 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Komedi Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

There are Democrats who have concerns about Platner, but the idea that we’ll be lectured by folks that support Donald Trump and want Texans to choose Ken Paxton is ludicrous. The man’s wife left him on biblical grounds! Mainers know who Platner is and chose him anyway. They want to win that seat and think Platner is best suited to do it.

There are Democrats who have concerns about Platner, but the idea that we’ll be lectured by folks that support Donald Trump and want Texans to choose Ken Paxton is ludicrous. The man’s wife left him on biblical grounds! Mainers know who Platner is and chose him anyway. They want to win that seat and think Platner is best suited to do it.

Jessica Tarlov

532,246 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

MSNOW host Luke Russert on the Politico article about Graham Platner: “I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party.” “Well, I think something that jumped out to me in the article, which I just read, is that the person who made the accusations was very conflicted about coming forward, and primarily because she said she very much supported Platner’s politics and believed in his messaging and didn’t want to hurt him politically, but also felt it necessary to see the full scope of the person, and I think that’s something that is going to have to be wrestled with. If these allegations are true, to this extent, I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party. I think there’s a lot of people who might look at this out of the gate and say, well, Ken Paxton in Texas is is terrible, and the Republicans are putting him up, and he is someone who has had all sorts of legal issues and infidelity issues, etc. I think what you have here, though, is a pickup opportunity is incredibly important in Maine for the party if they want to get control of the Senate, but also somebody who there is a belief that he may have gotten through the storm on this, but now is looking that it’s significantly worse than what was advertised, and especially for a party that was so intertwined with Me Too, and believing women, it looks very hypocritical if there is not, I think, a real examination of him moving forward.”

MSNOW host Luke Russert on the Politico article about Graham Platner: “I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party.” “Well, I think something that jumped out to me in the article, which I just read, is that the person who made the accusations was very conflicted about coming forward, and primarily because she said she very much supported Platner’s politics and believed in his messaging and didn’t want to hurt him politically, but also felt it necessary to see the full scope of the person, and I think that’s something that is going to have to be wrestled with. If these allegations are true, to this extent, I don’t see how he can be the nominee for senator in Maine for the Democratic Party. I think there’s a lot of people who might look at this out of the gate and say, well, Ken Paxton in Texas is is terrible, and the Republicans are putting him up, and he is someone who has had all sorts of legal issues and infidelity issues, etc. I think what you have here, though, is a pickup opportunity is incredibly important in Maine for the party if they want to get control of the Senate, but also somebody who there is a belief that he may have gotten through the storm on this, but now is looking that it’s significantly worse than what was advertised, and especially for a party that was so intertwined with Me Too, and believing women, it looks very hypocritical if there is not, I think, a real examination of him moving forward.”

Curtis Houck

89,071 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Shermichael Singleton just singlehandedly destroyed the Democrats’ case for their embattled Senate candidate Graham Platner. All he had to do was call out the blatant double standard — and he did it right in the face of Democrat shill Ro Khanna. SINGLETON: “I find that a bit ironic.” “For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation.” “That they were standing up for justice, that they were upholding morality, that they said Trump was an affront to.” “And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade.” “You have this guy who’s saying he’s going to make a speech to draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins.” “He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh.” “Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who’s now the defender of women.” “So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it’s convenient for them.” “But now that there’s a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could out seat Susan Collins, you know what?” “It doesn’t necessarily matter, the ten plus years of arguments we’ve made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who’ve empowered Trump, because we can win a seat.” “It’s very machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void.” “They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars.” “And I think as we get into the general election, you’re going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the nrsc, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are.” “Look at who they’re supporting, the guy with the Nazi tattoo.” Democrats have no moral authority left. Shermichael Singleton

Shermichael Singleton just singlehandedly destroyed the Democrats’ case for their embattled Senate candidate Graham Platner. All he had to do was call out the blatant double standard — and he did it right in the face of Democrat shill Ro Khanna. SINGLETON: “I find that a bit ironic.” “For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation.” “That they were standing up for justice, that they were upholding morality, that they said Trump was an affront to.” “And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade.” “You have this guy who’s saying he’s going to make a speech to draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins.” “He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh.” “Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who’s now the defender of women.” “So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it’s convenient for them.” “But now that there’s a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could out seat Susan Collins, you know what?” “It doesn’t necessarily matter, the ten plus years of arguments we’ve made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who’ve empowered Trump, because we can win a seat.” “It’s very machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void.” “They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars.” “And I think as we get into the general election, you’re going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the nrsc, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are.” “Look at who they’re supporting, the guy with the Nazi tattoo.” Democrats have no moral authority left. Shermichael Singleton

Overton

136,508 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Hasan explains his stance on Democrats & if he’ll support candidates like Gavin Newsom Says they should not take his and the left flank’s vote for granted but still believes republicans are far more damaging “I want the Dem party to treat me like a Never-Trumper..want the Dem party to treat me like a triple Trump voter..cuz it turns out that’s all they’re tuned into..if what it takes for democrats to turn around and be like wait a minute, we’re losing this guy..instead of taking my vote for granted as they’ve done so over and over again for the left flank..then I’m gonna say things that may or may not end up being true..but it doesn’t matter, we’re so far out..now is ur opportunity to find a good candidate instead” “I hate republicans..think the republicans are far more damaging..the biggest terr*rists..I want to fight against the growing fascist movement in this country..my frustration w the Dems is their conciliatory attitude towards that” (Via Pod Save America)

Hasan explains his stance on Democrats & if he’ll support candidates like Gavin Newsom Says they should not take his and the left flank’s vote for granted but still believes republicans are far more damaging “I want the Dem party to treat me like a Never-Trumper..want the Dem party to treat me like a triple Trump voter..cuz it turns out that’s all they’re tuned into..if what it takes for democrats to turn around and be like wait a minute, we’re losing this guy..instead of taking my vote for granted as they’ve done so over and over again for the left flank..then I’m gonna say things that may or may not end up being true..but it doesn’t matter, we’re so far out..now is ur opportunity to find a good candidate instead” “I hate republicans..think the republicans are far more damaging..the biggest terr*rists..I want to fight against the growing fascist movement in this country..my frustration w the Dems is their conciliatory attitude towards that” (Via Pod Save America)

yeet

40,975 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Graham Platner: “Everybody knows in their bones they are being robbed and screwed. It is why we are angry. We need to be again the party to tap into that anger. We need to be the party that has the message to tell people who is to blame. We spend a lot of time pointing fingers left and right, but we should be pointing fingers in only one direction and that is up.”

Graham Platner: “Everybody knows in their bones they are being robbed and screwed. It is why we are angry. We need to be again the party to tap into that anger. We need to be the party that has the message to tell people who is to blame. We spend a lot of time pointing fingers left and right, but we should be pointing fingers in only one direction and that is up.”

Marco Foster

10,727 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This is why Shermichael Singleton Singleton won the Media Research Center's Bulldog Award for Outstanding Achievement Behind Enemy Lines. Tonight on CNN, he calls out the left for supporting Graham Platner and proving themselves to be "nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars": "I find that a bit ironic. For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation. They were standing up for justice. They were upholding morality that they said Trump was an affront to. And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade. You have this guy who's saying he's going to make a speech to make a con- or draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins. He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh. Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who's now the defender of women? So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it's convenient for them. But now that there's a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could [un]seat Susan Collins, you know what? It doesn't necessarily matter, the ten-plus years of arguments we've made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who empower Trump, because we can win a seat. It's very Machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void. They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars. And I think as we get into the general election, you're going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the NRSC, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are. Look at who they're supporting the guy with the Nazi tattoo.

This is why Shermichael Singleton Singleton won the Media Research Center's Bulldog Award for Outstanding Achievement Behind Enemy Lines. Tonight on CNN, he calls out the left for supporting Graham Platner and proving themselves to be "nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars": "I find that a bit ironic. For a long time now, Democrats have long argued that what fueled their passions against Trump was a sense of of righteous indignation. They were standing up for justice. They were upholding morality that they said Trump was an affront to. And now what we all realize is that that was all a facade. You have this guy who's saying he's going to make a speech to make a con- or draw a contrast against himself and Susan Collins. He stands up for women. She does not, because she voted for Brett Kavanaugh. Yet we just had not more than a week ago, very serious allegations against this very same guy who's now the defender of women? So to me, it seems like maybe a defender of women for my Democratic friends, when it's convenient for them. But now that there's a political electoral opportunity to maintain their majority in the Senate, and Graham Platner could [un]seat Susan Collins, you know what? It doesn't necessarily matter, the ten-plus years of arguments we've made about morals and ethics against Trump and Republicans who empower Trump, because we can win a seat. It's very Machiavellian in many ways. And to me, any argument that Democrats have framed against Trump, against Republicans is now null and void. They have revealed themselves to be nothing but hypocrites, nothing but liars. And I think as we get into the general election, you're going to see the case made by Susan Collins, made by the NRSC, that Democrats are not the people that they said that they are. Look at who they're supporting the guy with the Nazi tattoo.

Nicholas Fondacaro

53,787 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Joy Behar falsely claims Justice Kavanaugh "had accusations exactly like" Platner's against him. Sunny Hostin calls on her Democratic Party to find someone who speaks to Platner's voters because she insists Democrats can win the seat: JOY BEHAR: But at least the Democrats are dumping him. Whereas, Susan Collins was one of the major votes to put Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court and he also had allegations exactly like this. If I recall correctly. Am I wrong? SUNNY HOSTIN: Well, the allegations were a little bit different but they were of a sexual nature. BEHAR: Exactly. HOSTIN: And you have someone like Pete Hegseth who is actually in the cabinet who was accused of rape, and actually settled with that woman and paid her $50,000. But I will say this, you know, to Whoopi's point about the Maine voters will speak, they've interviewed a lot of Maine voters after he stepped down, and one Maine voter in particular said, 'Platner did show to establishment Democrats that this is exactly what Maine wants, these are the policies that we want. This is the messaging that we want.' And I think when you look at Platner's platform which was ban billionaires buying elections, universal healthcare, defend Medicare and Medicaid, protect Social Security, support unions, support public schools, support our veterans, no more pointless wars, and bring Gaza genocide to an end. If Maine is saying that's the type of candidate they want, those are the policies that they want, then I think the Democratic National Committee needs to listen to that and find, you know, some sort of contender that speaks to those voters. Because he could have won this race but for these -- I think the additional allegations that came forward that the voters did not know about. SARA HAINES: Yes. HOSTIN: But I think that this is a winnable race. I think Susan Collins is not good -- not a fair representation of the Maine voter right now, and I think the Democrats need to win this race.

Joy Behar falsely claims Justice Kavanaugh "had accusations exactly like" Platner's against him. Sunny Hostin calls on her Democratic Party to find someone who speaks to Platner's voters because she insists Democrats can win the seat: JOY BEHAR: But at least the Democrats are dumping him. Whereas, Susan Collins was one of the major votes to put Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court and he also had allegations exactly like this. If I recall correctly. Am I wrong? SUNNY HOSTIN: Well, the allegations were a little bit different but they were of a sexual nature. BEHAR: Exactly. HOSTIN: And you have someone like Pete Hegseth who is actually in the cabinet who was accused of rape, and actually settled with that woman and paid her $50,000. But I will say this, you know, to Whoopi's point about the Maine voters will speak, they've interviewed a lot of Maine voters after he stepped down, and one Maine voter in particular said, 'Platner did show to establishment Democrats that this is exactly what Maine wants, these are the policies that we want. This is the messaging that we want.' And I think when you look at Platner's platform which was ban billionaires buying elections, universal healthcare, defend Medicare and Medicaid, protect Social Security, support unions, support public schools, support our veterans, no more pointless wars, and bring Gaza genocide to an end. If Maine is saying that's the type of candidate they want, those are the policies that they want, then I think the Democratic National Committee needs to listen to that and find, you know, some sort of contender that speaks to those voters. Because he could have won this race but for these -- I think the additional allegations that came forward that the voters did not know about. SARA HAINES: Yes. HOSTIN: But I think that this is a winnable race. I think Susan Collins is not good -- not a fair representation of the Maine voter right now, and I think the Democrats need to win this race.

Nicholas Fondacaro

16,289 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Asmongold explains why Graham Platner is one of the "most beneficial" things that could have happened to the Republicans "I think Graham Platner is actually great for the Democrats..he completely destroys their moral high ground against Trump..really great so many of them are rallying around" "I think that to a certain extent that they did have a point that Donald Trump..bad actor in a lot of ways..but none of that matters whenever they're defending ppl that are doing things that are equivalent" "I would say middle of the road ppl care about it (Platner's allegations)..it is still a point that they had..Biden for all of his faults was not anywhere near as morally ambiguous as Donald Trump was" "Keep this in mind whenever they want to disqualify anybody for being racist or saying some sort of other bad stuff..all of their morality is performative..this is one the most beneficial things that could have ever happened to Republicans..now it shows and reveals how completely hypocritical Democrats are"

Asmongold explains why Graham Platner is one of the "most beneficial" things that could have happened to the Republicans "I think Graham Platner is actually great for the Democrats..he completely destroys their moral high ground against Trump..really great so many of them are rallying around" "I think that to a certain extent that they did have a point that Donald Trump..bad actor in a lot of ways..but none of that matters whenever they're defending ppl that are doing things that are equivalent" "I would say middle of the road ppl care about it (Platner's allegations)..it is still a point that they had..Biden for all of his faults was not anywhere near as morally ambiguous as Donald Trump was" "Keep this in mind whenever they want to disqualify anybody for being racist or saying some sort of other bad stuff..all of their morality is performative..this is one the most beneficial things that could have ever happened to Republicans..now it shows and reveals how completely hypocritical Democrats are"

yeet

25,044 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I do not know how we got here to a place where this is even something we need to speak about, but we are here and we have to be real! Enough is enough ! Enough with the lies ! Enough with the trying to create something that doesn’t need to exist! men are men women are women THATS IT.

I do not know how we got here to a place where this is even something we need to speak about, but we are here and we have to be real! Enough is enough ! Enough with the lies ! Enough with the trying to create something that doesn’t need to exist! men are men women are women THATS IT.

Tish Hyman

302,167 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

Mario Nawfal

12,668,082 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,719 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Elon Musk: It shouldn't be up to a few media oligarchs to steer the narrative. “The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – they do that – but their choice of narrative. What are they going to talk about? By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. Whereas, I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 19, 2024

Elon Musk: It shouldn't be up to a few media oligarchs to steer the narrative. “The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – they do that – but their choice of narrative. What are they going to talk about? By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. Whereas, I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

2,288,802 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Debbie Dingell on CNN sounds INSANE talking about the new allegations against Graham Platner: "I will always be concerned about domestic violence allegations, sexual assault allegations...but we got a man in the White House...people's lives are being impacted by this every single day!" "It's a VERY complicated situation!" "Ultimately, this is up to the people of Maine...They want someone who's gonna stand up to Donald Trump." "The candidate is denying these charges...We don't know what the facts are..." "It just gets complicated." "He said he's taking a step back. That was a very powerful statement!" "He understands the need for change." "We NEED change...!"

Debbie Dingell on CNN sounds INSANE talking about the new allegations against Graham Platner: "I will always be concerned about domestic violence allegations, sexual assault allegations...but we got a man in the White House...people's lives are being impacted by this every single day!" "It's a VERY complicated situation!" "Ultimately, this is up to the people of Maine...They want someone who's gonna stand up to Donald Trump." "The candidate is denying these charges...We don't know what the facts are..." "It just gets complicated." "He said he's taking a step back. That was a very powerful statement!" "He understands the need for change." "We NEED change...!"

Townhall.com

52,545 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Greg Gutfeld knocks it out of the park. He says he “resents” having to debate Democrats over ideas like socialism that have been tried and failed for generations. It’s devouring the Democrat Party alive but that’s their problem to deal with, not the Republicans’. GUTFELD: “I resent having to debate over ideologies that have not only failed, but killed millions.” “That we are having this discussion is offensive, so I feel like we should leave this with the Democrats.” “You know, and focus on not articulating a message but implementing the message that we have.” “If you think about it, all the major fronts, we’ve won.” “The opposition has retreated on the trans agenda, the climate agenda, which we don’t hear about, the open border agenda, and for good reason.” “Their reality got a cold shower.” “Men can’t be women.” “Fossil fuels are necessary.” “A country can’t survive without a border.” “Crime is not a lifestyle of the oppressed.” “And your identity doesn’t matter when you are making me a smoothie.” “So all these destructive beliefs were beaten, but still they are alive and twitching in the DSA.” “And if they don’t put that out, the Democrat Party’s toast. So that’s their battle, it’s not ours.”

Greg Gutfeld knocks it out of the park. He says he “resents” having to debate Democrats over ideas like socialism that have been tried and failed for generations. It’s devouring the Democrat Party alive but that’s their problem to deal with, not the Republicans’. GUTFELD: “I resent having to debate over ideologies that have not only failed, but killed millions.” “That we are having this discussion is offensive, so I feel like we should leave this with the Democrats.” “You know, and focus on not articulating a message but implementing the message that we have.” “If you think about it, all the major fronts, we’ve won.” “The opposition has retreated on the trans agenda, the climate agenda, which we don’t hear about, the open border agenda, and for good reason.” “Their reality got a cold shower.” “Men can’t be women.” “Fossil fuels are necessary.” “A country can’t survive without a border.” “Crime is not a lifestyle of the oppressed.” “And your identity doesn’t matter when you are making me a smoothie.” “So all these destructive beliefs were beaten, but still they are alive and twitching in the DSA.” “And if they don’t put that out, the Democrat Party’s toast. So that’s their battle, it’s not ours.”

Overton

89,876 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

BREAKING: Trump is STANDING FIRM against Schumer and has no fear of a government shutdown, because it will be THEIR FAULT! "I think we could very well end up with a closed country for a period of time. We’ll take care of the military and take care of Social Security, we’ll take care of the things we have to take care of." "A lot of the things the Democrats fight for, which are not very good things, are not going to be able to be paid, and we’ll watch and see how they do with that" He is calling their bluff.

BREAKING: Trump is STANDING FIRM against Schumer and has no fear of a government shutdown, because it will be THEIR FAULT! "I think we could very well end up with a closed country for a period of time. We’ll take care of the military and take care of Social Security, we’ll take care of the things we have to take care of." "A lot of the things the Democrats fight for, which are not very good things, are not going to be able to be paid, and we’ll watch and see how they do with that" He is calling their bluff.

Gunther Eagleman™

1,447,508 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

.Vice President JD Vance: "We are seeing signs that the Straits are starting to reopen... The deal is a ceasefire, a negotiation — that's what we give — and what they give is the Straits are going to be reopened. If we don't see that happening, President Donald J. Trump is not going to abide by our terms if the Iranians are not abiding by their terms."

.Vice President JD Vance: "We are seeing signs that the Straits are starting to reopen... The deal is a ceasefire, a negotiation — that's what we give — and what they give is the Straits are going to be reopened. If we don't see that happening, President Donald J. Trump is not going to abide by our terms if the Iranians are not abiding by their terms."

Rapid Response 47

152,934 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

#BREAKING: Psaki: “Bad press for #KenPaxton is expected to only get WORSE because Paxton is currently in the middle of a messy divorce from his wife after allegations of numerous affairs…the proceedings for Paxton’s divorce are scheduled to be held in OPEN COURT in just four weeks—June…this is…part of why Republicans are now terrified that they could lose this Senate race, and Democrats have the ideal candidate to make their case against Ken Paxton…”😳

#BREAKING: Psaki: “Bad press for #KenPaxton is expected to only get WORSE because Paxton is currently in the middle of a messy divorce from his wife after allegations of numerous affairs…the proceedings for Paxton’s divorce are scheduled to be held in OPEN COURT in just four weeks—June…this is…part of why Republicans are now terrified that they could lose this Senate race, and Democrats have the ideal candidate to make their case against Ken Paxton…”😳

Emoluments Clause

117,926 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

We’ve said it time and again: it doesn’t matter who is in the file—Democrat or Republican—we want to ensure there is accountability. But when Donald Trump or Elon Musk show up in the files, Republicans are deafeningly silent. They aren’t serious about getting to the bottom of this.

We’ve said it time and again: it doesn’t matter who is in the file—Democrat or Republican—we want to ensure there is accountability. But when Donald Trump or Elon Musk show up in the files, Republicans are deafeningly silent. They aren’t serious about getting to the bottom of this.

Rep. Summer Lee

44,162 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce