正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Denmark’s PM Mette Frederiksen: Our problem in Ukraine is still that there are red lines when it comes to the weapons they can use to win this war. And you cannot win a war with one hand tied on your back. We need to give them weapons so they... show more

Clash Report

705,450 subscribers

13,994 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨SEVERE SCHIZOPHRENIA IS RUNNING IN EUROPE Instead of discussing peace talks, Frederiksen is STILL pushing for weapons so Zelensky can 'strike into Russia' Denmark's PM Mette Frederiksen: We need to give them weapons so they can strike into Russia.

🚨SEVERE SCHIZOPHRENIA IS RUNNING IN EUROPE Instead of discussing peace talks, Frederiksen is STILL pushing for weapons so Zelensky can 'strike into Russia' Denmark's PM Mette Frederiksen: We need to give them weapons so they can strike into Russia.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

14,743 次观看 • 7 个月前

Danish PM Frederiksen: "There are still red lines on the weapons Ukraine can use to win this war. You cannot win a war with one hand tied behind your back. We need to give them the weapons to strike inside Russia. We’ve been having this discussion for years — and we’re still having it. For the last three conferences, I’ve asked the same question: Why aren’t we providing the air defense they desperately need? Yet the response is always the same — hesitation and shrugs. They still don’t have enough air defense. You cannot protect a country without it. We know exactly what must be delivered: unrestricted long-range weapons and, of course, NATO membership. If we had made that decision in Vilnius, the situation today would be completely different. We know what to do. But first we must finally recognize, understand, and accept one hard truth: Russia will not change."

Danish PM Frederiksen: "There are still red lines on the weapons Ukraine can use to win this war. You cannot win a war with one hand tied behind your back. We need to give them the weapons to strike inside Russia. We’ve been having this discussion for years — and we’re still having it. For the last three conferences, I’ve asked the same question: Why aren’t we providing the air defense they desperately need? Yet the response is always the same — hesitation and shrugs. They still don’t have enough air defense. You cannot protect a country without it. We know exactly what must be delivered: unrestricted long-range weapons and, of course, NATO membership. If we had made that decision in Vilnius, the situation today would be completely different. We know what to do. But first we must finally recognize, understand, and accept one hard truth: Russia will not change."

Kate from Kharkiv

103,656 次观看 • 7 个月前

Denmark’s prime minister has called for strikes deep inside Russia, saying that “the Russians only understand strength.” “You cannot win a war just by having weapons on your shoulders. Ukraine must receive everything it needs to win,” Mette Frederiksen emphasized. Based?

Denmark’s prime minister has called for strikes deep inside Russia, saying that “the Russians only understand strength.” “You cannot win a war just by having weapons on your shoulders. Ukraine must receive everything it needs to win,” Mette Frederiksen emphasized. Based?

NEXTA

350,837 次观看 • 7 个月前

FREDERIKSEN: One of the things where I have disagreed with some of my colleagues is all the red lines that have been put on Ukraine, because I don't think you can win a war with red lines. You remember in the beginning, we were willing to give away some of our F-16s. We were not allowed to do that because some allies said, "Well, we cannot put our fighter jets in Ukraine." Then we had questions about long-range weapons. That was also red line. There have been so many red lines. It's almost like we have asked you to defend Europe with one arm behind your back. That has not been fair. And one of the ways to get around some of these red lines is producing directly in Ukraine, because now you can produce some of the weapons that some allies have been refusing to give you.

FREDERIKSEN: One of the things where I have disagreed with some of my colleagues is all the red lines that have been put on Ukraine, because I don't think you can win a war with red lines. You remember in the beginning, we were willing to give away some of our F-16s. We were not allowed to do that because some allies said, "Well, we cannot put our fighter jets in Ukraine." Then we had questions about long-range weapons. That was also red line. There have been so many red lines. It's almost like we have asked you to defend Europe with one arm behind your back. That has not been fair. And one of the ways to get around some of these red lines is producing directly in Ukraine, because now you can produce some of the weapons that some allies have been refusing to give you.

Kate from Kharkiv

81,882 次观看 • 3 个月前

FREDERIKSEN: Main reason Ukraine still standing is Ukraine. We supported them, that’s good. But we were slow on weapon deliveries, imposed red lines. Ukraine still not in NATO. We asked them to fight with one hand behind their back. Huge mistake. You have to fight war to win it.

FREDERIKSEN: Main reason Ukraine still standing is Ukraine. We supported them, that’s good. But we were slow on weapon deliveries, imposed red lines. Ukraine still not in NATO. We asked them to fight with one hand behind their back. Huge mistake. You have to fight war to win it.

Kate from Kharkiv

158,981 次观看 • 4 个月前

Admiral Rob Bauer: If Russia wanted to attack NATO, where do you think that decision would be taken? In Beijing. Chinese are basically allowing Russia to stay in war. They provide Russia with everything they need to make weapons. Chinese can still say, "We don't give weapons." But they literally give Russia everything it needs to make those weapons. Therefore, I think if Russia wanted to attack NATO, they would have to ask permission in Beijing. Russia is spending everything in Ukraine to win the war. America and Europe support Ukraine with our military and financial assistance. Who is to gain from that? It is China. They can continue to build their military strength and prepare for whatever they want to achieve. And Russia is becoming more and more the junior partner in that limitless partnership.

Admiral Rob Bauer: If Russia wanted to attack NATO, where do you think that decision would be taken? In Beijing. Chinese are basically allowing Russia to stay in war. They provide Russia with everything they need to make weapons. Chinese can still say, "We don't give weapons." But they literally give Russia everything it needs to make those weapons. Therefore, I think if Russia wanted to attack NATO, they would have to ask permission in Beijing. Russia is spending everything in Ukraine to win the war. America and Europe support Ukraine with our military and financial assistance. Who is to gain from that? It is China. They can continue to build their military strength and prepare for whatever they want to achieve. And Russia is becoming more and more the junior partner in that limitless partnership.

Kate from Kharkiv

356,340 次观看 • 2 个月前

Former U.S. Army and Defense Secretary, Mark Esper: We should increase both economic and military pressure on Russia. We should provide Ukraine weapons they need, allow them to strike deep into Russia, push war onto Russian territory, and put greater pressure on Putin at home. We need to seal holes in sanctions regime, restore lifted sanctions on Russian energy, and impose additional sanctions on Russia. On the military side, we should provide Ukraine with weapons they need, including long-range weapons. And not just provide those weapons, but also give them the ability to strike deep into Russia.

Former U.S. Army and Defense Secretary, Mark Esper: We should increase both economic and military pressure on Russia. We should provide Ukraine weapons they need, allow them to strike deep into Russia, push war onto Russian territory, and put greater pressure on Putin at home. We need to seal holes in sanctions regime, restore lifted sanctions on Russian energy, and impose additional sanctions on Russia. On the military side, we should provide Ukraine with weapons they need, including long-range weapons. And not just provide those weapons, but also give them the ability to strike deep into Russia.

Kate from Kharkiv

16,481 次观看 • 3 个月前

Nikki Haley is absolutely right when it comes to Ukraine: “Russia said once they take Ukraine, Poland, and the Baltics are next..Those are NATO countries. If that happens, America is at war…We need to give them the equipment and ammunition to win” 🇺🇸🇺🇦

Nikki Haley is absolutely right when it comes to Ukraine: “Russia said once they take Ukraine, Poland, and the Baltics are next..Those are NATO countries. If that happens, America is at war…We need to give them the equipment and ammunition to win” 🇺🇸🇺🇦

Republicans against Trump

1,012,724 次观看 • 2 年前

Denmark’s PM Mette Frederiksen on Russia: Talking about the number of losses — 35,000 — if it were in one of our countries, it would be a major disaster and we would never be able to forgive ourselves. But it’s Russia, and they don’t count soldiers by the number of 35,000. We have to compare it with the Second World War and the numbers they lost there. We cannot compare ourselves with the mindset in Moscow.

Denmark’s PM Mette Frederiksen on Russia: Talking about the number of losses — 35,000 — if it were in one of our countries, it would be a major disaster and we would never be able to forgive ourselves. But it’s Russia, and they don’t count soldiers by the number of 35,000. We have to compare it with the Second World War and the numbers they lost there. We cannot compare ourselves with the mindset in Moscow.

Clash Report

27,696 次观看 • 7 个月前

Kevin Maguire on #GMB: "Why are we still selling weapons to Israel... they are guilty here of war crimes... the mass slaughter of so many Palestinians is a war crime... can you imagine if Russia was doing this in Ukraine... why is Israel being allowed to do this in Gaza?"

Kevin Maguire on #GMB: "Why are we still selling weapons to Israel... they are guilty here of war crimes... the mass slaughter of so many Palestinians is a war crime... can you imagine if Russia was doing this in Ukraine... why is Israel being allowed to do this in Gaza?"

Saul Staniforth

274,268 次观看 • 2 年前

"There can be no limits for Ukraine in the long-rangeness, when terrorists don't have these limits. Defenders of life cannot have limits on weapons when Russia uses both its own weapons of all types, and then Shaheds, and ballistics from North Korea." - President Zelenskyy called to allow Ukraine to strike Russian territory with Western long-range weapons. We must be able to defend ourselves. Fighting with one hand tied behind our back will lead to even more deaths and destructions.

"There can be no limits for Ukraine in the long-rangeness, when terrorists don't have these limits. Defenders of life cannot have limits on weapons when Russia uses both its own weapons of all types, and then Shaheds, and ballistics from North Korea." - President Zelenskyy called to allow Ukraine to strike Russian territory with Western long-range weapons. We must be able to defend ourselves. Fighting with one hand tied behind our back will lead to even more deaths and destructions.

Anton Gerashchenko

295,972 次观看 • 2 年前

BROWDER: What we should do is give Ukrainians all resources they need, and just let them finish Putin off. So far, we've drip-fed resources to them, giving enough so they couldn't lose, but not so much so they could win. We could give Ukrainians €220 billion in frozen Russian assets sitting in Brussels so Ukraine can buy weapons. We could give them stuff to shoot down Russian missiles, cut off all Russian oil exports so Russia has no money. How should we deal with this war? It's either Ukraine is going to win and Russia is going to lose, or vice versa. We could help Ukraine win , but we're all just wanting this negotiations, not wanting to push things too far. While we're busy doing that, Ukrainians getting on with it as best as they can, doing pretty good job even without us.

BROWDER: What we should do is give Ukrainians all resources they need, and just let them finish Putin off. So far, we've drip-fed resources to them, giving enough so they couldn't lose, but not so much so they could win. We could give Ukrainians €220 billion in frozen Russian assets sitting in Brussels so Ukraine can buy weapons. We could give them stuff to shoot down Russian missiles, cut off all Russian oil exports so Russia has no money. How should we deal with this war? It's either Ukraine is going to win and Russia is going to lose, or vice versa. We could help Ukraine win , but we're all just wanting this negotiations, not wanting to push things too far. While we're busy doing that, Ukrainians getting on with it as best as they can, doing pretty good job even without us.

Kate from Kharkiv

34,942 次观看 • 1 个月前

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the MSC in Munich: „Russia has to give up this terrible war against Ukraine, and we have to do everything that is needed to bring them to the point, where they see no further advantages in continuing this terrible war. We are not yet there. But this war is now lasting longer than the Second World War. It’s terrible. Russia has it in its hand to stop it, but we also have it in our hands, America and Europe together with Ukraine to bring them to this point.“

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the MSC in Munich: „Russia has to give up this terrible war against Ukraine, and we have to do everything that is needed to bring them to the point, where they see no further advantages in continuing this terrible war. We are not yet there. But this war is now lasting longer than the Second World War. It’s terrible. Russia has it in its hand to stop it, but we also have it in our hands, America and Europe together with Ukraine to bring them to this point.“

(((Tendar)))

89,957 次观看 • 7 个月前

British combat medic in Ukraine, Project Konstantin charity director Pete from Project Konstantin tells Western nations that if they don't give Ukraine the weapons it needs to win now, they will be needing to use them themselves. "It's a holy war; we are fighting pure evil," he says. Whole interview:

British combat medic in Ukraine, Project Konstantin charity director Pete from Project Konstantin tells Western nations that if they don't give Ukraine the weapons it needs to win now, they will be needing to use them themselves. "It's a holy war; we are fighting pure evil," he says. Whole interview:

Euromaidan Press

96,843 次观看 • 2 年前

Sen. Tom Cotton: “What we need from the president is to get out of this mindset of trying to end the war. Instead, we need to help Ukraine win the war. And they're only gonna win if we continue to supply them with the weapons that they're asking for.” (2022)

Sen. Tom Cotton: “What we need from the president is to get out of this mindset of trying to end the war. Instead, we need to help Ukraine win the war. And they're only gonna win if we continue to supply them with the weapons that they're asking for.” (2022)

Republicans for Ukraine

117,707 次观看 • 1 年前

Q: “You said Ukraine can win the war and reclaim territory.” Trump: “They still can win. I said they can win anything. War is a very strange thing. I don’t think they will win.”

Q: “You said Ukraine can win the war and reclaim territory.” Trump: “They still can win. I said they can win anything. War is a very strange thing. I don’t think they will win.”

Polymarket Intel

27,439 次观看 • 11 个月前

Reporter: Do you think Russia can use nuclear weapons in the war against Ukraine? Rutte: Well, they know if that happens the reaction is devastating.

Reporter: Do you think Russia can use nuclear weapons in the war against Ukraine? Rutte: Well, they know if that happens the reaction is devastating.

Clash Report

40,183 次观看 • 4 个月前