Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Devara Day1 is just a Trial Ball.. Mega fans Mid Night melukuni Negative Talk spread chese lopu OG day1 egiripoddhi Jr NTR @NTRNeelFilm #NTRNEEL #Dragon

67,957 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 34

Фото профиля HHVM on May9th
HHVM on May9th1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm asalu devara ne erriipooku opening...except ceded and os..cheap ga memu ah day1 ni emduku target pettukuntam..ma day1 target RRR..hhvm thone try chestam

Фото профиля ASTROMEDA - Wishlist on Steam!
ASTROMEDA - Wishlist on Steam!2 лет назад

A small teaser of Astromeda! It's a game inspired by Pokemon, Undertale, and OneShot. Wishlist on Steam! #TrailerTuesday #indiegame #IndieGameDev #GamingNews #Steam

Фото профиля professo®©
professo®©1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm

Фото профиля Red Flower
Red Flower1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Eede ankunta ycp ki 120+ ah 130+ ani ycp vallani gudipindi..🤣..eedu malli cinema numbers ivvadam..

Фото профиля DC
DC1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Printer shop lone untara enti production team antha mega highest lu lepadaniki peddha plan ae 😂

Фото профиля Tarakɢᴏᴩɪʸᵃᵈᵃᵛ🪓
Tarakɢᴏᴩɪʸᵃᵈᵃᵛ🪓1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm 💥🥵

Фото профиля Un disputed Sai 💊
Un disputed Sai 💊1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Hires thone ga

Фото профиля Telugu Tammudu
Telugu Tammudu1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Politics lo active ga unna kalyan tho compare cheskuntav entra poyi Bunny or Prabhas tho chesko

Фото профиля RIOTseaDRugSTER
RIOTseaDRugSTER1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Adi atta

Фото профиля sAthish🦅
sAthish🦅1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Elanti jokes ayadu nuvu 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Фото профиля Tweeterizm 🦅
Tweeterizm 🦅1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Asalu discussion ee bokka 😂 AP/TS lo OG ki daridapullo kuda undadhu rasi pettuko

Фото профиля RC the KING 🚁
RC the KING 🚁1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Posters lone ga NAGA VAMSHI ki ivvamanu rights

Фото профиля Wounded_Beast 🦅
Wounded_Beast 🦅1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Record Lu ,Day 1 la Gurunchi pakkana Pettu ,Thana OG Cinema Midha Single Tweet veyakunda ,single Promotion Cheyakunda Day 1 Pedathadu ,Adhi Thana Varam ,Thanaku mathrame Dakkina Varam "King Kalyan Bolthe" Pakkaki Velli Aaduko Reddy

Фото профиля PKCult2102 🦅
PKCult2102 🦅1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Devara tho em peekaru ? maaadhi yentha sammagaa untado veediki

Фото профиля sunnystyls
sunnystyls1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Nuvu og day 1 devara ni datutadhi anukuntunnava😂🙏

Фото профиля Shashank
Shashank1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Same.. to same.. same feel asalu!.. same energy... Devara time lo ni frnd satish ig! Elevation icchadu!.. Hit talk tho RRR🔥 Flop talk tho Salaar 🔥🔥 Result... Mixed talk tho sahoo kinda 😂😂🤡🤡🤡

Фото профиля Siva🦅
Siva🦅1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm ha inka 🤡

Фото профиля RAMPAGE 🐉 ᵂᵃʳ²
RAMPAGE 🐉 ᵂᵃʳ²1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm bhojpuri star tho compare cheyyaku bhai. NTRNEEL tho ATR pedthunnam

Фото профиля 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐯𝐞 𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐨𝐧 🐉
𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐯𝐞 𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐨𝐧 🐉1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Lohit ra lafoot na kodaka 🥵🐉

Фото профиля Mukhesh@9999 🐉🐉🐉
Mukhesh@9999 🐉🐉🐉1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm 🔥🔥🔥

Фото профиля Sanjay Saahu
Sanjay Saahu1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm 🤦💩 intha erripukulu foreign lo Ela ra bathikedi 🤣🤣 ayyo foreign lo kadu bathroom lo kada bathikedi

Фото профиля Always Ram
Always Ram1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Day 1 day 2 lu records anni lepina, No one Can reach his Aura. Aa celebrations ni benefit shows ki unde racha ni taaakadam avari valla avadu.. Edhi Gurthu Pettuko after OG and After NTRneel we will discuss. Maku records avasaram ledu Just movie release ayite Chaalu Adoka Festival

Фото профиля ꜱɪᴠᴀ ᴘꜱᴘᴋ 🦅
ꜱɪᴠᴀ ᴘꜱᴘᴋ 🦅1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm

Фото профиля Saich031982
Saich0319821 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Nee account kanapadutunte time line lo adoka vibe broo🤣🤣🤣

Фото профиля Kalyan_Lokesh 🦅
Kalyan_Lokesh 🦅1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm OG Ni touch kuda cheyaleru

Фото профиля 𝐈🇳‌🇹‌🇷‌ηαтισηαℓ
𝐈🇳‌🇹‌🇷‌ηαтισηαℓ1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm @Love_Cinemaa is in the form 💥💥

Фото профиля pspk_addict🦅❗
pspk_addict🦅❗1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Joker na moxxa🤡

Фото профиля YOGI War²
YOGI War²1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Aa Hey Toofan hey 💥💥💥💥

Фото профиля Tarock
Tarock1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Other than pushpa 2(sequel) Allu Arjun Next film Aa time ki Every Star Hero Day 1 lechipoddhi ✅ Varasaga Every year prathi star hero movie release aithe Appudu telustundhi evadi guddhalo entha dammundho Combo hype chuskoni rechipothunnar anni og og og og

Фото профиля Bannu gadu
Bannu gadu1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Og ki day 1 oste ga levataniki 😔

Фото профиля Ruthless
Ruthless1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Sujeeth prashant neel okatey antav😂😂..

Фото профиля Mahendra _Backup
Mahendra _Backup1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Joke lu bale vesthadu vidu 🤣😂

Фото профиля Cltuch Player
Cltuch Player1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Kuttha muskoni first sahoo ni lepandi tarvthaki alochiddham le gani

Фото профиля Red Flower
Red Flower1 год назад

@tarak9999 @NTRNeelFilm Sujeeth prashanth neel okatena ra pichi kutha logics nuvvu..krish gaditho teesi eh elevations eskondra nizam weakest hero fans

Похожие видео

Since when did bringing a 3 year old to a Hot crowded late night rock concert become a family friendly event? On Five Finger Death Punch Official This woman says I'm typically NOT the one to complain or be negative, however... To the couple in the middle of section 400, Row S in Cincinnati at Riverbend. Shame on you! How very un-Knucklehead family of you and I hope you have the life you deserve! My husband and I splurged to get decent seats for our 3 kiddos' summer birthdays (11 year old son, 20 year old son and 3 year old daughter, her first 5FDP show). Our daughter has been to other rock shows (in the lawn) and was a champ! Hubby left to get waters for everyone (mid 5FDP set), especially baby girl. While he stepped away she was fussy bc she was thirsty (otherwise she was having a blast). The lady leaned down to say, very rudely, "Can you get her to be quiet?!" As calmly as I could I turned around to say, "she has just as much right to be here as you." She, very insincerely apologized, but the damage had already been done. I was SO upset and didn't want to get myself in trouble for my mouth that I took my 3 kiddos to meet up with hubby. I literally thought our fun family night had been ruined. My husband talked to ushers about the situation and they kindly offered a similar seating area that had since cleared out. I'm just SO disheartened, bc I know 5FDP is all about mini rockers, as is the typical fan base. I understand folks getting frustrated with fussy kiddos in an airplane, but at a rock show, in seats?! As anyone who was there knows, it was SO hot that Ivan opened a tab at a concession stand for any and everyone to get free water. We had waters and neck fans too, but it was definitely hot, even at night.

Ravious101 🦅

140,114 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I want to send a huge THANK YOU to all the #Eagles fans who have contributed to our Hail BBQ Crew LUNGevity Foundation fundraiser in the fight against lung cancer. Before Championship weekend, we had raised $8.5K. After the now infamous Hard Rock Cafe Ted video which, for the record, I didn’t film or even know was being recorded we’ve surpassed $26K! The majority of those donations have come from 🦅 fans. [Donate Here: I know this might not sit well with some of my fellow Burgundy and Gold fanmily, but let’s be real not all Eagles fans are bad. Over the weekend, I met some incredible people, and this fundraiser proves that there are plenty more out there. Let’s not judge an entire fan base based on a few loud bad apples. Unfortunately, showing kindness to opposing fans doesn’t go viral negativity does. Just look at the video claiming I left the game early, which has racked up over 2 million views. For the record, I was just heading to the bathroom and stayed for the fireworks at the end of the game. To those still flooding my social media with trash talk keep it coming! Clearly, I live rent-free in your heads. When I come back next season, just make sure my guest room is ready. I want to thank PFT Commenter & Big Cat for the mentions on Pardon My Take & for not going to hard at me. I also want to thank Christie Ileto at Action News on 6abc for taking the time to speak with me and helping spread the word that Philadelphia fans are good people. I'm looking forward to going back to the Linc next season. I'll see you all at the Hard Rock Sat night before our game. "Let’s take that place over again!" 1st rd of Philly tap waters are on me. Good luck in the Super Bowl and Go Chiefs!

Tailgate Ted

28,504 просмотров • 1 год назад

One shot. One dream. One unforgettable finish. ⚽🔥 Made this cinematic World Cup final using Agent Team inside RoboNeo with visuals powered by Seedance 2.0. Video Prompt 👇 A cinematic 30 second World Cup inspired short film set in a futuristic mega stadium at night. The atmosphere is electric with packed crowds waving flags, flashing lights, giant holographic scoreboards, smoke effects, and cinematic rain reflections on the pitch. Opening scene starts with a young underdog football captain walking through the stadium tunnel in slow motion while hearing the deafening roar of fans. Close up shots of boots touching the wet ground, tense faces, jerseys moving in the wind, and dramatic eye contact between rival teams. Ultra realistic cinematic camera movement, emotional tension, dynamic lighting, realistic crowd reactions, premium sports commercial quality. As the beat intensifies, transition into fast paced World Cup action. Explosive dribbling sequences, impossible skill moves, aggressive tackles, synchronized team movement, dramatic goalkeeper saves, and cinematic slow motion shots of the ball flying across the field. Final hero shot begins at the climax of the match. The captain performs a gravity defying bicycle kick from outside the box while multiple defenders leap in slow motion. Stadium lights flicker, rain particles freeze mid air, crowds erupt, camera rotates around the player in ultra cinematic style as the ball curves perfectly into the top corner of the net. Massive fireworks explode above the stadium while teammates rush in celebration. Hyper realistic visuals, emotional storytelling, cinematic sports trailer pacing, high energy World Cup atmosphere, multi character consistency, smooth action choreography, realistic physics, premium blockbuster film quality, anamorphic lens flare, dramatic sound design, epic final frame with trophy reflection and roaring crowd. #RoboNeo

Leonardo

46,724 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇷🇺🚀 RANGE BUYS THE LAUNCHER TIME. PRODUCTION WINS THE WAR. The first confirmed combat use of Russia’s upgraded 9M723-2 — provisionally tagged Iskander-1000 and fielded with the Bora-M launcher — is not a science-fiction leap to a thousand kilometres. It is something more Russian, and more dangerous to NATO planning: an extra one hundred and sixty kilometres of depth added to a missile already built, already stockpiled, already understood by the crews who fire it. 🇷🇺 Ukraine’s Main Directorate of Intelligence said the new round was used in a combined strike on Kiev this summer, that it belongs to a system called Bora-M, and that the fielded missile reaches about 550 kilometres against roughly 390 for the 9M723-1. Defence Blog, RBC-Ukraine and UK Defence Journal all carried the same core claim within a day. The name still oversells the round that actually flew. The 1,000-kilometre figure belongs to a further stretch still in development. That distinction matters. So does the fact that Moscow did not wait for the brochure range before putting extra depth into the fight. The question that follows is the only one that counts for a war of attrition. Which matters more: the extra range, or the accuracy and production tempo of a design Russia already manufactures at scale? NOT A NEW MISSILE. A DEEPER ONE. Most of the 9M723-2 remains the same family Russia has used for years. Public assessments, including the Ukrainian disclosure itself, say the principal change is a larger motor and a launcher able to carry it. Everything else — the quasi-ballistic profile, the short warning time, the mobile transporter-erector-launcher logic — stays inside a system the industry already knows how to build. 🇷🇺 That is the point Western commentary keeps missing. A clean-sheet intermediate-range missile would have been a prestige project and a production bottleneck. An enlarged Iskander is a factory decision. Military Watch Magazine, writing from the other side of the ledger than Kiev, has treated the programme as a doubling of the old five-hundred-kilometre class by carrying more energy in a familiar airframe rather than inventing a new architecture. Russian military analyst Evgeny Damantsev, in a series of briefings carried by Russian technical outlets, has described the same logic since 2024: keep the 9M723 layout, raise the energy of the motor, accept a lighter warhead on the longest shots, and put the result on a high-mobility ground launcher instead of waiting for a bomber or a ship. Telegram channel Russkoe Oruzhie went further in January, claiming a high-impulse motor and a thousand-kilometre class of flight. The Russian Defence Ministry has issued no matching communique. That silence is useful. It leaves the fielded 550-kilometre Bora-M shot as the fact, and the 1,000-kilometre talk as the programme horizon. A serious general staff can use both numbers without confusing them. EXTRA ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY KILOMETRES OF HUNTING GROUND** Range is not a vanity statistic. It is geography. An extra 160 kilometres means the same target set — Kiev and other deep objectives — can be held at risk from launch areas that used to sit outside the old envelope. Crews can disperse across a wider belt of Russian and rear territory, fire, and move again before NATO-supported sensors finish the hunt. 🛰️🇷🇺 Ukrainian aviation commentator Kostiantyn Kryvolap, speaking to RBC-Ukraine, sketched the old problem in the opposite direction: with a 390-kilometre missile, a shot at Kiev pulled launchers toward more exposed ground. Stretch the reach and the launcher park expands. Every extra kilometre is another forest track, another decoy set, another place a HIMARS or drone team has to search before the vehicle is gone. The hunter’s problem scales with area. The shooter’s problem does not scale as fast, because the crew still needs only minutes on the pad. Russian open-source commentary quoted in Western leak round-ups made the reconnaissance point in blunt language: American missile-warning constellations do not get a polite label on the plume that says “this one is the short Iskander” or “this one is the long one.” The defender has to treat a larger rear as live. Aircraft and air-defence radars that light up to cover that rear advertise themselves. That is not a video-game mechanic. It is the old Soviet preference for forcing the opponent to defend everywhere so he can be strong nowhere. Military Watch Magazine’s August assessment pushed the same geography onto the European map. After a combat trial in the Ukrainian theatre, the magazine and Russian-side speculation it cited pointed to Kaliningrad as the logical later home for a longer Iskander class — a deployment that, if the full programme range is ever reached, would put much of Central Europe and the Baltic inside a mobile ground battery’s arc. Even the more conservative 550-kilometre figure already changes the hunt inside the current war. The thousand-kilometre talk is the next planning problem for NATO, not the round that just flew. THE PROFILE THAT STILL STEALS MINUTES The Iskander family was never a simple lofted ballistic arc. It is a fast, maneuvering quasi-ballistic shot that compresses the defender’s decision cycle. Patriot and similar batteries do not get a leisurely track. They get minutes. Russian analysts have been explicit about that for years. Damantsev put the optical-satellite warning window for a future thousand-kilometre class at two to seven minutes depending on the target’s distance. Aleksey Leonkov, speaking to about the same family, stressed irregular pitch and yaw in the terminal phase — a path that is ugly for a fire-control computer that wants a predictable intercept point. 🇷🇺 None of that required a new nameplate. The upgraded missile, on every serious account, keeps the family flight profile and adds reach. The interception problem is therefore not “a brand-new physics package.” It is the old physics package arriving from a wider set of azimuths, launched from a deeper set of hide sites, in salvos already mixed with drones and cruise missiles. Combined strikes are how Russia has used the Iskander for a long time. Extra range simply lets those salvos be generated from safer ground. RUSI’s earlier technical profile of the Iskander-M and Iskander-K remains the useful Western baseline: a mobile two-round launcher, a quasi-ballistic missile with a steep terminal dive, and enough seeker options to make the system more than a dumb range stick. The 9M723-2, if the Ukrainian and Russian-side descriptions are both even half right, is that baseline with more motor and a bigger tube. The defender who hoped the upgrade would force Russia into a clumsy new missile that factories cannot build is waiting for a gift Moscow declined to give. WHAT THE RUSSIAN ANALYSTS ACTUALLY ARGUED Damantsev’s public case, repeated across 2024–2026 Russian technical coverage, is not “build a wonder weapon.” It is “put medium-range fire on a truck that can hide.” He argued that ground launchers with signature-reduction kits can occupy firing points without the infrared circus of a Tu-95, a surface ship or a MiG-31K taking off. Once the motor lights, satellites will see the plume. The remaining flight is then a handful of minutes. The correct industrial answer, in his view, was to prioritise series production of a longer Iskander class rather than treat it as a boutique test article. That is an argument about factories and basing, not about magic fuel. Military Watch Magazine’s January 2025 preview and its August 2026 combat-debut note form a single through-line. First: a derivative that aims to double the old treaty-era envelope after Washington walked out of the INF Treaty. Second: a first combat use, with Russian sources already talking Kaliningrad as the European follow-on. The magazine also flagged a second industrial effect. A longer domestic ballistic round reduces the need to lean on imported short-range ballistic types of similar reach. Whether one accepts every kilometre in those essays or not, the strategic preference is consistent. Russia wants a mobile, ground-based shot that NATO cannot archive as “only 500 kilometres, only from the old pads.” Leonkov’s commentary to sits in the same school: the value of the family is not a straight line on a map but an ugly line in the sky. A missile that yaws and pitches on the way down is a missile that spends the defender’s interceptors. Pair that with a launcher that no longer has to creep toward the border and the system starts to look like what Soviet designers always wanted after the Oka was bargained away — a precise operational-tactical stick that lives far enough back to survive. None of those voices should be treated as official range tables. They should be treated as the Russian debate that actually happened: stretch the existing missile, keep it mobile, make the West search a larger map, and do not wait for a perfect thousand-kilometre round if a 550-kilometre round is already on a truck. THE FACTORY IS THE OTHER WARHEAD Accuracy without inventory is a demonstration. Inventory without accuracy is harassment. Russia’s advantage on this family is that both already exist. Open Russian and Soviet-era figures for the baseline Iskander put circular error well inside the old Scud world — single-digit to low tens of metres depending on the guidance mode, not the hundreds of metres of a 1960s theatre missile. RUSI noted the electro-optical seeker path that pulled CEP down into the kind of band that can hit a radar or a launcher, not merely a district. That accuracy is why the system is used against air-defence positions and command nodes rather than as a city-flattening area weapon of last resort. Production is the multiplier. Ukrainian researcher Oleksandr Zaruba told Interfax-Ukraine in June that Russia was turning out about sixty Iskander-M ballistic missiles a month and about ten Iskander-K cruise missiles. Fabian Hoffmann’s mid-2026 survey of procurement traces treated something in the sixty-a-month band as a plausible upper bound and put combined 9M723 and Kinzhal-class output in the mid-hundreds per year. Those numbers will be argued over. What they are not is a cottage industry. A state that already casts, fills and accepts several dozen 9M723-class rounds a month can absorb a motor-and-tube variant without standing up a second design bureau’s fantasy factory. Procurement traces published in 2025 already showed a small first batch of eighteen missiles under the 9M723-2 designation. That is how a conservative industry introduces a longer round: a pilot lot, a combat trial, then a decision about how much of the monthly sixty becomes the new standard. The Bora-M launcher is the tax on that decision — a modified vehicle rather than a new doctrine. Kryvolap himself, no friend of the programme, called the launcher a stronger set of rails and a tougher structure, not a revolution. That is faint praise from the other side, and it is the praise that should worry NATO. Revolutions slip. Line extensions ship. WHICH MATTERS MORE? Longer range matters because it keeps the launcher alive. Accuracy matters because a missile that lands in the next block wastes a scarce airframe. Speed of production matters because a theatre war is a contest of magazines, not of first-shot press releases. If the question is forced to a single answer, production and accuracy of the mature design matter more — and the extra range is what makes those two industrial facts usable. 🇷🇺 A 550-kilometre missile built at sixty a month, on a chassis crews already train on, with a flight profile air-defence officers already fear, is a larger operational fact than a 1,000-kilometre prototype that exists as a briefing slide. The 160-kilometre bonus is the difference between parking the battery in a hunted belt and parking it in a belt the hunter has not staffed. It does not replace the factory. It gives the factory’s output somewhere safer to live. That is why the upgrade path is the story, not the nickname. Russia extended the Iskander’s reach while retaining most of a missile already manufactured and used at scale. NATO-backed intelligence now has to watch more ground, sort real launchers from decoys, and get coordinates to a Ukrainian shooter before the vehicle moves. The interceptor still has only minutes after the plume. The seeker still has to solve a maneuvering endgame. The plant in the Iskander chain still has a monthly number to hit. The thousand-kilometre chapter, if and when it is certified, will be a European planning problem. The 550-kilometre chapter is already a Ukrainian one. Military Watch can talk Kaliningrad. Damantsev can talk two-to-seven-minute warning. GUR can insist the name is a lie and the range is 550. All three statements can be true at once. The lie in the nickname does not cancel the extra depth. The extra depth does not cancel the fact that the same industry is still pouring the standard missile. WHAT THIS DOES TO THE MAP For the current war, the practical effect is simple. Targets that used to require a launcher to edge forward can be held at risk from further back. The search radius for counter-battery and drone hunters grows. Combined night salvos still arrive in minutes. The defender’s Patriot crews do not receive a new law of physics. They receive the old law from more compass points. 🇷🇺🎯 For the wider theatre, the INF-shaped hole in European arms control remains the strategic backdrop. Washington left the treaty. Moscow is filling the gap with the family it already owns rather than with a museum piece. A mobile ground missile that can grow from the old treaty-safe band toward a genuine intermediate-range band is exactly the system a continental power wants when the other side talks about moving its own long-range batteries onto German soil. Damantsev said that part out loud years ago. The summer shot at Kiev is the first unpaid advertisement. None of this requires pretending the fielded round is a 1,000-kilometre weapon. Honesty is a weapon too. Call the Bora-M missile a 550-kilometre Iskander with more hide space. Call the thousand-kilometre project the next increment. Then look at the production line. A state that can keep the old missile flowing while feeding a longer cousin into the same crews has chosen the unromantic path: stretch what works, hide the truck, and let the magazine do the rest. That is the Russian answer to the question. Range keeps the launcher on the board. Accuracy makes each round worth the propellant. Production decides whether the board still has pieces on it in the sixth month and the eighteenth. The 9M723-2 is not a miracle. It is a deeper Iskander. In a long war, that is the upgrade that the Enemy will feel the consequences . 🇷🇺🚀

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺 🇷🇸🇮🇪

19,218 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Last night was the biggest disaster in the history of Tesla. Let me walk you through what actually happened on that earnings call, because the headlines are doing you a disservice: Elon Musk got on the call and admitted (his words) that Hardware 3 "simply does not have the capability to achieve unsupervised FSD." He said he wished it were otherwise. He said the memory bandwidth is one-eighth of what Hardware 4 has. And that's the end of the conversation. Approximately 4 million Tesla vehicles on the road right now have Hardware 3. Many of those owners paid $8,000 to $15,000 for Full Self-Driving capability based on Musk's repeated promises (going back to 2016) that the hardware was sufficient for full autonomy. As recently as 2022, Musk was publicly assuring owners that HW3 had the processing power to get it done. BUT IT DIDN'T Those promises are now officially broken. The solution is a "discounted trade-in" toward a new car with Hardware 4. Not a refund or a free upgrade... A discount on buying ANOTHER Tesla. Investor Ross Gerber said it too - all HW3 owners got screwed, and with roughly 285,000 FSD purchasers affected, the potential liability runs into the BILLIONS. But that's not even the worst part. Musk was asked if the current FSD v14.3 was ready for unsupervised deployment. He said yes. Then immediately walked it back and admitted Tesla has "major architectural improvements" in the pipeline that would significantly improve safety. What he really means: the software isn't SAFE ENOUGH to deploy without a human watching. Full unsupervised FSD for consumer cars is pushed to Q4 2026. At the earliest... Maybe. How many times has this deadline been pushed? I've lost count. And trust me, I've seen a lot of broken promises. But this one takes the cake. Now let's talk about the numbers everyone is celebrating: Tesla reported $22.4 billion in revenue and $0.41 in non-GAAP earnings. A "double beat." The stock popped 4% after hours. Victory, right? WRONG Dig into the actual filing: The number one driver of operating income improvement wasn't cost reductions, wasn't volume growth, wasn't FSD revenue. It was - and Tesla listed this FIRST in their own shareholder letter - "one-time benefits related to warranty and tariffs." They released warranty reserves. They booked tariff refund windfalls. They stretched supplier payments by 10 days. They took on billions in new debt. Then they presented everything through non-GAAP metrics that strip out over $1 billion in stock-based compensation. GAAP net income was $477 million on $22.4 billion in revenue. That's a 2.1% net margin. On a $1.4 trillion market cap. Let me put that in perspective: 3.75 billion shares outstanding. Annualize the Q1 GAAP profit and you get roughly $1.9 billion. That's a trailing P/E ratio north of 700. Use the adjusted number - strip out stock comp, which is a REAL cost to shareholders through dilution - and you're still at around 250x earnings. All of this is extremely bad, but I didn't even talk about the CAPEX BOMB yet... 3 months ago, Tesla guided to "over $20 billion" in 2026 capital expenditure. Last night they raised it to over $25 billion. A $5 billion increase in a single quarter. That's 3x their historical annual capex run rate - $8.5 billion in 2025, $11.3 billion in 2024. The CFO confirmed on the call that Tesla expects NEGATIVE free cash flow for the rest of the year. So you have a company generating roughly $6 billion in annual free cash flow on a good year, and they're about to spend $25 billion. The math doesn't work. They will almost certainly need to issue equity. Which means dilution. Which means the $1.9 billion in annual earnings gets spread across even MORE shares. The core auto business is literally deteriorating in real time: Tesla delivered 358,000 vehicles in Q1 (missed estimates again). They produced 408,000. That's 50,000 cars sitting on lots that nobody bought. Inventory days jumped from 10 to 27 in just a few quarters. California (their most important US market) saw registrations crash 24% year over year. Their market share in the state fell from 9.2% to 7.7%. That's on top of a Q1 2025 that was ALREADY weak from Model Y retooling. They're declining off a decline. And here's what really kills the bull case... The entire valuation rests on robotaxis, Optimus robots, and autonomy. So let's put numbers on it: Waymo - the actual leader in autonomous driving with 15 million completed rides in 2025 alone, over 127 million autonomous miles driven, operating commercially across 6 US cities with plans to expand to 20 more - just raised $16 billion at a $126 billion valuation. That's the market's verdict on what the LEADING robotaxi company is worth. $126 billion. And Waymo is YEARS ahead of Tesla in actual deployment. Tesla has 3.75 billion shares outstanding. So even if you assign $126 billion in robotaxi value (giving Tesla full credit for matching Waymo despite being nowhere close) that's $33 a share. Add the auto business at generous auto-industry multiples, maybe $20 a share. Throw in energy storage and services, $10-15. Sum of the parts gets you to roughly $65-70 a share if you're feeling generous. Maybe $50 if you're not. The stock is $387. So what exactly are you paying for? You're paying for a STORY. You're paying for PROMISES that keep getting pushed back, technology that keeps falling short, and a business plan that requires spending $25 billion a year while the core product sells fewer units at declining margins in a market where California sales just fell 24% and the federal EV tax credit is gone. I managed the number one mutual fund in America. I founded two billion-dollar hedge funds. I've been doing this since 1981. And I am telling you: Tesla at $387 is one of the most egregious mispricings I have seen in my entire career. THE CRASH WILL BE EPIC

George Noble

1,230,260 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A dog just made the bravest decision I have seen anyone make this year. Not a founder. Not an athlete. Not a person with a plan and a five-year vision board. A dog, on an empty road, with nothing to lose and no idea what would come next. I have watched what comes next more times than I will admit in public. This post is 25,000 characters long. It is a list of reasons why you should watch it too. Read as much as you want, but understand one thing before you start: the video is the only part that matters, and this is everything the video doesn't have room to say. Sound on. Phone in both hands. Do not skip. I'll be here when you get back. THE NUMBER THAT SHOULD BOTHER YOU Let me start with two numbers. The first: commonly cited estimates put the world's stray dog population at around 200 million. Two hundred million animals with no address, no bowl with their name on it, and no one who would notice if they didn't come back tonight. The second number is one. That is how many people had to be on that road, at that exact minute, looking in that exact direction, in a good enough mood to stop. Not two. Not a crowd. One. Here is what nobody says out loud: for every dog you see rescued on camera, there are millions the camera never reached. We don't see them because no one was there. The videos that reach you are not a sample of reality. They are the winners of a lottery so brutal that Powerball looks like a coin flip next to it. So when one of these lands in your feed, don't scroll past it like content. Treat it like what it is: a statistical miracle that happened to end well. And miracles have a structure. Let's take this one apart. FIVE LINKS. BREAK ONE AND THE STORY DOESN'T EXIST. Link one: the dog has to survive long enough to be seen. Roads are not built for small animals. Vehicles do not slow down for shapes on the asphalt. Every hour out there is a coin flip the animal has to win again, and again, and again. Link two: someone has to be present. Not nearby. Present. Eyes up, phone down, brain not busy replaying the argument from breakfast. Link three: that someone has to notice. It sounds simple. It isn't. The human brain is a filtering machine, and a small animal on a road becomes a plastic bag, a shadow, a piece of tire. The most common reason a dog is not rescued is not cruelty. It is that nobody registered it as a dog. Link four: the person has to stop. This is the link that snaps most often. Seeing is free. Stopping costs you time, comfort, a schedule, and possibly the mood of your entire day. Link five: the dog has to let them. An animal that has learned that hands mean pain has every biological reason to run. Trust is not a given. It is a negotiation, and the dog holds the veto. Five links. All five held. Remember that when you press play. You are not watching a nice story. You are watching a chain that should have snapped at least four times. THE PEOPLE WHO KEEP DRIVING In 1968, psychologists John Darley and Bibb Latane published a set of experiments that changed how we think about helping. The finding was uncomfortable: the more people who witness an emergency, the less likely any one of them is to act. They called it diffusion of responsibility. Everyone assumes someone else will handle it. So nobody does. Later research added nuance. When an emergency is clear and dangerous, people step in more often than the original theory predicted. But the core insight has survived half a century of testing, because it describes something every one of us has felt: the small, quiet voice that says, somebody else will stop. Now picture a road with no crowd at all. No audience. No one to hide behind. No one to blame. Just you and a decision that is entirely, inescapably yours. That is the situation the person in this video walked into. And the reason it is worth your attention is not that they did something impossible. It is that they did something small, and it turns out small is exactly what almost nobody does. You don't need to be a hero. You need to be inconvenienced. THE FACE IS THE RESUME In 2013, researcher Bridget Waller and her team studied dogs in a UK shelter and asked a simple question: what makes one dog get adopted faster than another? It wasn't size. It wasn't age. It wasn't coat color. It was one tiny facial movement: the raising of the inner eyebrows. The move that makes a dog's eyes look bigger, softer, almost sad. Dogs that did it more often were chosen faster. Six years later, a study led by Juliane Kaminski found out why that movement is so easy for dogs and so hard for wolves. Dogs have a small muscle around the eye that wolves largely lack. Over thousands of years of living beside us, dogs evolved a way to make their faces speak our language. Read that again. A species rewired its own anatomy to be understood by another species. No other animal has done this to us. Nobody taught them. Nobody forced them. They looked at us, worked out what we respond to, and grew the tool. Now look at the face in this video. You will know the second you see it. That is not a coincidence, and it is not luck. It is fifteen thousand years of engineering aimed directly at your chest. THE ONLY LOOP LIKE IT ON EARTH In 2015, a Japanese team led by Miho Nagasawa published a result in the journal Science that made researchers stop and reread the abstract. When a dog and its owner look into each other's eyes, both of their oxytocin levels rise. Oxytocin is the bonding chemical, the same one that flows between a mother and her newborn. Dog looks at human. Human's oxytocin rises. Human looks back, touches, talks softly. Dog's oxytocin rises. Which makes the dog look longer. Which makes the human's oxytocin rise again. A feedback loop of affection, running across two species, powered by nothing but eye contact. Here is the part that gets me: the effect did not show up the same way in wolves raised by humans. The loop is not just training. It is something that evolved between us. So the next time someone says a dog is just responding to food, tell them there is a peer-reviewed study that disagrees. And keep this fact in your pocket for the video. Because at some point, a moment of eye contact happens in it, and I want you to know what is really going on in that room. THEY CAN SMELL WHAT YOU'RE HIDING Humans have roughly 6 million scent receptors. Dogs are commonly cited as having around 300 million. A large share of a dog's brain is devoted to processing smell. What you experience as a room, a dog experiences as a layered document: who was here, how long ago, and how they felt. In 2022, researchers at Queen's University Belfast tested something remarkable. They collected breath and sweat samples from people before and after a stressful task. Then they asked dogs to tell the samples apart. The dogs got it right nearly 94 percent of the time. Your body broadcasts your emotional state as chemistry. You cannot turn it off. You cannot fake calm. A dog reads your fear, your tension, your irritation, before you have opened your mouth. Which means every rescue is, at its core, a test of one thing: are you actually calm, or are you performing calm? The dog knows. It always knows. And that is why what happens in the first few seconds of this video matters more than anything that comes after it. Watch the body language. Watch how slowly things move. Watch what is not done. THE MOST IMPORTANT MOMENT IN ANY RESCUE IS THE ONE WHERE NOTHING HAPPENS Animal behaviorists describe fear responses in four flavors: fight, flight, freeze, and fawn. Fight is what people expect. Flight is what most strays do. Freeze is what looks like calm but isn't. And fawn, the desperate, wiggling, please-don't-hurt-me appeasement, is the one that breaks your heart the fastest, because it looks like friendliness and it is actually terror. Rescuers who have done this hundreds of times will tell you the same handful of rules. Don't loom. Don't stare straight into the eyes. Get low. Turn sideways. Slow everything down until it feels absurd. Let the animal close the last few feet on its own terms. The hardest instruction, and the one most people can't follow, is the last one: do nothing. Every instinct you have says reach out. Grab. Fix. Take control of the situation. And every good rescue begins with someone who did the opposite. Who made themselves small, patient, and boring, and waited for a frightened animal to decide that the safest thing in its whole world might be a stranger. You are about to watch someone do exactly that. Notice how little they need to say. THE TEARS THEY WON'T PUT IN THE HEADLINE Scientists are careful people. They do not like to say "dogs cry." But in 2022, a team from Azabu University in Japan, led by Takefumi Kikusui, measured tear volume in dogs during reunions with their owners. The result: tear volume rose significantly compared with reunions involving other familiar people. And when researchers applied oxytocin to the dogs' eyes, tear volume rose again. Not sadness crying. Not the crying we do. Something else, something closer to overflow. The body producing water at the exact moment the heart has more in it than it can hold. Nobody has proven that this is the same thing we feel. Scientists will tell you that, and they are right to. But here is a question worth sitting with. If an animal's eyes fill with water when it sees the one being it has decided to trust, what exactly are we arguing about? Watch the eyes in this video. Then tell me what you think you saw. ONCE IT HAS A NAME, IT STOPS BEING A STATISTIC In 2007, psychologist Paul Slovic and colleagues ran an experiment on generosity. They showed people a fundraising appeal for a hungry child, and then a second version that added statistics about millions of other children in the same crisis. More data. More context. More reasons to care. Donations dropped. Slovic called it psychic numbing. The human mind can hold one face. It cannot hold two hundred million. When a tragedy becomes a number, empathy quietly switches off, and we don't even notice it happening. This is why one named animal in one small video can do what a hundred reports full of charts cannot. It gives your brain something it can actually care about: a single life, with a face, a fear, and a future that could go either way. The stray population is a statistic. A dog is a story. And stories, unlike statistics, come with a name at the end. When you reach that moment in the video, pay attention to what it does to you. Notice the small shift in your chest. That is the sound of a number turning into a person, or close enough. THE WORD FOR WHAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO FEEL Researchers have a name for the feeling you get when something touches you so suddenly that your throat tightens and your eyes sting. They call it kama muta, Sanskrit for "moved by love." Anthropologist Alan Fiske proposed that it is a distinct emotion, triggered by a sudden intensification of closeness. Two beings who were strangers become bonded. Someone who was alone becomes part of something. People across many cultures describe the same set of signs: warmth in the chest, goosebumps, a lump in the throat, tears they didn't plan on, and a strong urge to hug someone or hold something. Here is what makes it useful and not just sweet: kama muta is one of the most reliable emotional responses we have. It shows up when reunions happen. When a stranger helps unexpectedly. When an animal, after a long time alone, is finally held. You've felt it. You just never had a word for it. Take note of the exact second it hits you in this video. I promise there is one. And if you're the kind of person who says "I never cry at videos," I would like to schedule a follow-up. WHY YOU'LL WANT TO BE A BETTER PERSON AFTER ONE MINUTE Psychologist Jonathan Haidt studied a related feeling and gave it a name: elevation. Elevation is what you feel when you watch someone do something morally beautiful, quietly, with nothing to gain. It is not envy and it is not admiration. It is an urge, physical and immediate, to do something good yourself. In studies, people who experienced elevation were more likely to help others afterward, more likely to volunteer, and more likely to describe wanting to become better versions of themselves. Read that as a design spec. A short piece of true, unstaged kindness can change what a person does in the hour after they see it. Which is a strange, lovely thing for a phone to be capable of. We spend so much time discussing what social media does wrong. Nobody wonders what would happen if the best five percent of it, the small, real, human moments, were the part that traveled farthest. Let this one travel. It has earned it. THE RARE THING: SOMETHING TRUE THAT WINS In 2018, researchers at MIT published a study in Science that analyzed millions of tweets. The result was grim: false news spread significantly faster and further than true news. False stories were about 70 percent more likely to be retweeted, driven largely by surprise and disgust. The lesson most people took away was that this platform rewards outrage. I want to take a different lesson. If false stories win because they trigger strong emotion, then true stories can win too, as long as they trigger stronger ones. A video with no villain, no scandal, and no argument. Nothing to be angry about. Nothing to dunk on. A rescue that is exactly what it looks like. That kind of content should lose on this platform. It has no fuel. And yet every so often, one of them breaks through and reminds everyone what this place was supposed to be. I am not asking you to like it. I am asking you to notice that you had a choice about what to feed today, and this was one of the options. SOME FRIENDSHIPS SHOULDN'T WORK Somewhere near the end of this video, a second character enters the story. I won't tell you who. I won't tell you what happens. I will tell you that if you have ever read anything about instincts, hunting drives, or the way certain animals are supposed to see each other, this moment will quietly rearrange your assumptions. Behaviorists talk about prey drive as if it were destiny. It is not. It is a tendency, and tendencies can be softened by experience, by safety, by being raised, or re-raised, in a place where no one is afraid. The same dog that once had to look after itself alone can, in a different life, learn that the world contains creatures that are not threats or meals. Only neighbors. That is the most hopeful idea in behavioral science, and it usually gets buried in footnotes: what an animal was is not the same as what an animal can become. The same is true for most of us, incidentally. But that is a different post. Stay for the ending. It is the reason I am writing this at all. THE PART THE INTERNET NEVER FILMS Every rescue video has the same shape: the meeting, the rescue, the transformation, the happy ending. It is edited that way because it is the only shape that gets watched. But ask anyone who has actually done this, and they will tell you the truth is in the gap between the second and third act. The first night. The first week. The first time a dog that has never lived indoors realizes there is a floor that doesn't move, a door that closes without danger, and a bowl that will be full again tomorrow. Rescuers have a rule of thumb for this, the 3-3-3 rule. Three days for a dog to decompress. Three weeks to start learning the routine. Three months to feel truly at home. It's not science, exactly, just a shorthand built from thousands of adoptions. But it captures something real: safety is not a switch. It is a process, and the animal has to believe it slowly, one uneventful day at a time. That means the happiest scenes in this video are not the ones that look like celebrations. They are the quiet ones. A dog that stops scanning the room. A body that finally lets go. Look for the moment the shoulders drop. Once you see it, you'll never unsee it. THE COST OF STOPPING: NINETY SECONDS Let's do the math on the thing that most people are afraid of. How long does it actually take to stop for an animal in trouble? Not the whole rescue. Just the decision, the pulling over, the first attempt. Ninety seconds. Sometimes less. Ninety seconds is the length of a bad song on the radio. It is the time you spend waiting for a light to change. It is a scroll through a feed you won't remember. And on the other side of those ninety seconds is the difference between a living animal and a statistic. I'm not saying this to make anyone feel guilty. Guilt is a terrible motivator. It makes people avoid the feeling instead of acting on it. I'm saying it because the barrier is almost always imagined. We inflate the cost of helping in our heads, and the imagined price is what stops us, not the real one. The person in this video paid the real price. It was small. What they got in return is something no one could have planned for. That is the part you should watch closely. IF YOU'RE EVER THE ONE ON THAT ROAD Save this section. Someday, someone reading it will need it. Put your safety first. Pull over where it's safe and turn on your hazard lights before anything else. A second accident helps no one. Do not chase. A frightened dog runs faster than you and directly into the worst possible place. Chasing turns a rescue into a pursuit. Get low and go slow. Sit down if you can. Turn your body sideways. Avoid direct staring. Speak softly, or don't speak at all. Use food, if you have any. Something plain, tossed a little closer each time, works better than any technique. Check for a tag and, if you can get near enough, ask a vet or shelter to scan for a microchip. Someone may be looking for this animal right now. Call for help early. Local rescues, animal control, and vets can handle what you cannot. Sometimes the bravest thing you can do is make the right phone call. Take photos and note the location. If you can't keep the animal, those details are what let someone else finish the job. None of this is complicated. The reason it is rare is that most people have never been told that it is allowed. You are allowed. THE REAL STAKES OF A SMALL DOG Here is a bigger picture, and it's a heavy one. Millions of companion animals enter shelters every year in the United States alone. That is just one country. Many are lost pets that never get reclaimed. Many are strays. Many are animals whose owners ran out of money, time, or hope. Shelters are often crowded, underfunded, and staffed by people running on love and very little else. Every animal that finds a home, or a foster, or a stranger with ninety seconds to spare, frees up a space for the next one in line. That means every single rescue is bigger than the animal in it. It is a small change to a very large system, and the system is nothing but small changes stacked on top of one another. This is not an argument for guilt. It's an argument for scale. One dog saved is one dog saved, but it is also proof of concept, a demonstration that the chain can hold, that the odds can be beaten, that a person and a road and a decision can end well. And proof of concept is contagious. That is why you are seeing it. WHO REALLY GOT RESCUED? If you talk to people who have taken in strays, you'll hear the same sentence over and over, in different words. "I thought I was saving him. It turned out he was saving me." Skeptics roll their eyes at that. It sounds like a greeting card. And research on pets and wellbeing is more mixed than social media would like. It doesn't say every dog fixes every life. But there is something real underneath it, and it's not mystical. A dog is a machine for creating routine, attention, and reasons to leave the house. It needs you at a certain hour. It notices when you come home. It doesn't care about your job title, your follower count, or what you failed at last week. For some people, that is the first unconditional witness they have had in years. The rescue, in this light, is not one-way. Two lonely creatures, one who knew it and one who didn't, found out that they could take care of each other. Nobody can prove that from a video. But there is a version of the story that runs in the background of every rescue, and you can feel it if you let yourself. Tell me whether you feel it here. THE ATTENTION PARADOX Here is a strange fact about the platform you're reading this on. The average post gets a glance. A few words, a flick of the thumb, gone. Brands spend billions every year trying to buy three seconds of your attention, and most of what they buy evaporates before it lands. And yet a video of one dog, with no budget, no celebrity, and no script, can hold a stranger for a full minute. Without a single trick. Why? Because attention is not really about tricks. It is about stakes. Your brain is built to track living things whose outcome is uncertain. The moment there is a creature on screen and you don't yet know if it will be okay, some ancient part of you leans in and refuses to look away. That is the secret behind every great story ever told. Someone we care about. Something that could go wrong. A question we need answered. Marketers call it a hook. Your nervous system calls it worry. This video has both, and it pays off the worry honestly, which is why you leave feeling better instead of used. That is rare enough to deserve a full minute of your life. HOW TO WATCH THIS Most people will watch it wrong. They'll half-look at it between two other things, mid-scroll, thumb already moving. Here is how to get the actual effect. Turn the sound on. There is more happening in the audio than you expect. Make it full screen. This is a story about faces, and faces need room. Watch the first ten seconds without expecting anything. The film is quiet at the start. That is deliberate, or at least it works as if it were. Do not skip ahead. The whole thing depends on the distance between where it starts and where it ends. Skip the middle and the ending is just a nice clip. Then, once it's over, watch it again. The second time, you won't be watching for the story. You'll be watching for the small things you missed: a hesitation, a glance, a change in how a body carries itself. That second watch is where it gets you. I said I have watched it more times than I'll admit. That is the honest reason. It doesn't wear out. It gets deeper. THE CHALLENGE I want to try something with this post. If the video moved you, leave one comment: the second it happened. Not a review, not an analysis. Just the moment. I'm curious whether it's the same one for everyone. My guess is that it isn't, and that the spread of answers will say more about what people carry around with them than about the video. If it didn't move you, that is fine too. I'd like to hear that as well. Honest is better than polite. And if you have ever been the one who stopped, and I know some of you have, write that instead. Tell the story in two lines. No one has ever regretted the ninety seconds. Someone reading this thread might need to know that. Reposting this is the simplest way to put it in front of someone who's scrolling right now, in a bad week, thinking that nothing good happens by accident anymore. Something did. THE LAST THING Let me end where I started. A dog made a decision on an empty road. It could not have known how it would turn out. It had no reason to believe that the next hand would be different from the last. It went ahead anyway. That is the whole difference between a life that changes and one that doesn't. Not certainty. Not a plan. A willingness to move toward the unknown when the alternative is more of the same. The animal in this video did that. Then someone did the same in return. That's it. That's the entire story. Two beings, each of whom took a small, terrifying step toward the other, and a road that was, for a few seconds, the most important place in the world. Scroll up. Press play. Watch the ending. Then come back and tell me I was exaggerating. P.S. If you read all of this, you are exactly the kind of person this video was made for. Most people never make it past the first screen of a long post. You did. That tells me you are someone who stays: through the slow part, through the uncertain part, all the way to the end. Which is, when you think about it, the only quality that mattered in the story you're about to watch. Follow for more like this. I only post the ones that earn it. Bookmark it for days you forget the feeling. #Rescue #DogsOfX #SecondChances #AdoptDontShop #Dogs #AnimalRescue #RescueDog

Earth Unveiled

15,706 просмотров • 16 дней назад