Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Devastating fail

157,091 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Terence McKenna: "Culture is not your friend." Few thinkers put it as bluntly and few diagnoses of modern life cut as deep. McKenna's argument is simple and devastating: culture was never designed for your benefit. It was designed for the benefit of institutions. "Culture is not your friend. Culture is for other people's convenience and the convenience of various institutions: churches, companies, tax collection schemes." The indictment doesn't stop there. Culture doesn't just fail us passively. It actively diminishes us. "It insults you. It disempowers you. It uses and abuses you. None of us are well treated by culture." What makes this especially sharp is the contradiction he exposes. We collectively understand that the individual matters. We "glorify the creative potential of the individual," we believe in "the rights of the individual," we recognise that "the felt presence of experience is what is most important." And yet we let culture pull us in exactly the opposite direction. "The culture is a perversion. It fetishizes objects. It creates consumer mania. It creates endless forms of false happiness, endless forms of false understanding in the form of swirly religions and silly cults. It invites people to diminish themselves and dehumanize themselves." McKenna's critique isn't a counsel of despair. It's a call to clarity. Because beneath the machinery of false comfort, he saw something real: the actual resources exist to do better. "You can stand back and look at this planet and see that we have the money, the power, the medical understanding, the scientific knowhow, the love, and the community to produce a kind of human paradox." The paradox being: everything needed to build something genuinely good is already here. The obstacle isn't resources. It's leadership or the lack of it.

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

26,966 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨MUST WATCH: Palm Beach Pete Just Took A Lie Detector Test And Failed Miserably Results That Prove He's Hiding Something.📈❌ Palm Beach Pete, in a desperate attempt to prove he is NOT Jeffrey Epstein, just took a lie detector test and FAILED IT MISERABLY. He was caught being deceptive on the most critical question of all: "Have you and Jeffrey Epstein ever been in the same room together?" Watch him squirm. First, he tries to downplay it: "I was at a party and he was at that party. I never spoke to him. I never met him." Then, when pressed, he admits: "So the answer is yes, the answer was yes. I was in a room and he was in the same room." And the polygrapher's devastating response? "No, I'm getting a little deception there." Pete's final, pathetic words? "What can I tell you?" I don't know the truth! You don't know the truth? A man goes on national television, desperate to clear his name from the biggest conspiracy of the century, and his final defense is "I don't know the truth"? That's not a denial. That's a confession. This is the most pathetic attempt at a cover-up we have ever seen. An innocent man doesn't fail a polygraph about his connection to the person he supposedly looks like. An innocent man doesn't fumble his own story. An innocent man doesn't end his defense by claiming he doesn't know the truth. He failed the test. He was caught in a lie. He has the same face, the same teeth, the same tattoo, the same locations, the same "partnerships," and now, he has a failed polygraph to his name. How much more proof does the world need? They faked Epstein's death, and this bumbling fool is the result. He failed the lie detector test. Share this everywhere. The truth is coming out, whether they like it or not. 🇺🇸⚓️ From: Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Project Constitution

581,663 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Social Justice, What Children Go Through in Broken Families: The Heartbreaking Story of a Young Girl Forced to Grow Up Too Soon The government, particularly the Department of Social Welfare, falls tragically short of its responsibility to protect vulnerable children. This is the story of a 14-year-old girl who was pushed to abandon her childhood and turn herself into a woman far too soon. Her decision was not born out of desire but as a desperate response to years of relentless physical and emotional abuse at the hands of her own mum. She narrates how her mother would violently beat her for the smallest mistakes, robbing her of any sense of security or love in her own home. In her desperation, she lied to a man next door, claiming she was not underage, seeking refuge from what she describes as fear of being killed “vanondiuraya.” To make matters worse, the girl alleges her mother neglected her education, refusing to pay school fees. This compounded her despair, as she was left vulnerable and without hope for a better future. It is devastating that the system in this country offers little to no support for those trapped in such harrowing situations. Children like her are often forced to make very difficult decisions just to survive. Schools, instead of being safe havens, sometimes humiliate children whose parents fail to pay fees, parading them before their peers or sending them home. The government, particularly the Department of Social Welfare, falls tragically short of its responsibility to protect vulnerable children. Unlike in other countries where abused children can be swiftly placed in safe environments, our system lacks both the resources and the urgency to intervene in cases like this. And where are the police in all of this? Too often, they wait until tragedy strikes, when a child is raped, beaten to death, or otherwise irreparably harmed, before they take action. Proactive measures, such as educating communities and fostering a violence-free society, seem to be absent from their priorities. Video 📸📸 Platinum FM

Change Radio

46,964 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The US medical library holds 32,000 approved drugs. Buried within it are countless secrets & cures we're ignoring. Why? Dr. Pierre Kory delivered a devastating Senate testimony on the systematic war against safe, repurposed medicines. The reason is profit. Big Pharma makes money on new, expensive, patented drugs. It has no incentive to study cheap, off-patent treatments, even if they could save millions. In fact, it has every incentive to suppress them. How deep does the control go? - Nearly half the FDA's budget is paid by drug companies. - Tentacles extend deep into media, academia, and agencies like the NIH. - They wage a decades-long disinformation war against effective, affordable treatments. Their primary weapon? The manipulation of "Gold Standard" science. They have weaponized the Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). They design studies to FAIL for drugs they want to bury (like Ivermectin & HCQ): - Use critically low doses - Treat patients far too late - Select only the mildest cases Then, they selectively publish ONLY these negative studies and censor the positive ones. This is not a conspiracy. It is a documented tactic. The former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Marcia Angell, warned us in 2009: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published...” The pandemic was a case study. Look at this forest plot of 43 effective COVID treatments. The ONLY ones approved in the US? Those costing hundreds or thousands of dollars. Every $1, $2, or $5 medicine was ignored and smeared. The evidence is overwhelming today: - 420 trials on Hydroxychloroquine (½ million patients) - 100 trials on Ivermectin (125,000 patients) Meta-analyses show large, statistically significant benefits. Yet, they are dismissed as "horse paste" and "quackery." Why? They threaten a multi-billion dollar narrative. We must create a new framework. A public-private partnership of unconflicted stakeholders to independently study these repurposed drugs. It's a fight for medical freedom, scientific integrity, and countless lives. This is not about left vs. right. It is about right vs. wrong. Share if you believe patients deserve access to all safe and effective treatment options.

Camus

85,860 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

ONITSHA SHOPS LOOT – CALL FOR IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION AND JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS: I am deeply saddened by the viral video showing a female trader alleging that her shop was looted by officials of the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC). This alarming footage exposes a grave injustice that demands urgent action. Recently, I strongly condemned the indiscriminate closure of shops under the guise of combating counterfeit drugs. While the fight against fake pharmaceuticals is crucial, it must be carried out through lawful and ethical means that do not jeopardize the livelihoods of innocent traders. Unfortunately, our worst fears have now materialized. In my previous public statement, I urged security agencies and NAFDAC to investigate their personnel implicated in these allegations. However, despite the gravity of the situation, no action has been taken. This latest evidence - captured on video - clearly exposes officials entrusted with regulatory enforcement, allegedly engaging in outright looting, betraying public trust. The heart-wrenching testimony of this devastated trader is both troubling and unacceptable. Disturbingly, information available to us confirms that this innocent woman is currently receiving medical care at an undisclosed hospital after suffering severe shock from this traumatic incident. This is not just an economic assault but a direct attack on her dignity and well-being. I, therefore, call upon the relevant security agencies to conduct a swift, transparent, and comprehensive investigation to identify and hold accountable those responsible for this reprehensible act. NAFDAC must urgently assess and provide commensurate reparations for this devastating loss, ensuring that justice is not only served but also felt by the victims. Justice delayed is justice denied. Immediate disciplinary and legal measures must be enforced to restore public confidence in our institutions. Such misconduct has no place in a society striving for justice, peace, and economic stability. The livelihoods of hardworking citizens must be protected, and those who abuse their positions of trust must face the full weight of the law. If we fail to act decisively, we risk enabling a culture of impunity that will only deepen public distrust in our institutions. Signed: Sir Ifeanyi C. Ejiofor, Esq. (KSC) March 15, 2025

bar ifeanyi ejiofor

11,658 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗜𝗦 𝗔𝗟𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗𝗬 𝗕𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟴. 𝗛𝗘 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗦𝗡'𝗧 𝗧𝗢𝗟𝗗 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗬𝗘𝗧. Watch what Trump actually did — not what he said, but what he did. He put Marco Rubio in charge of the world. And he put JD Vance in charge of finding every dollar that was stolen from the American people. Those aren't random assignments. That's a chess move. Rubio becomes the face of whatever happens globally — the Iran war, the foreign policy realignment, the restoration of American strength abroad. If it goes well, he owns it. If it doesn't, he owns that too. Either way, by 2028 we'll know exactly what Marco Rubio is made of under real pressure. Vance gets the domestic mission — fraud, waste, corruption, government theft — and he gets it publicly, relentlessly, case by case. The Minneapolis story alone — billions siphoned from programs meant to feed hungry children — gives the argument exactly what every political argument needs: a villain, a victim, a number, and outrage. Trump even said it almost offhandedly: 𝘪𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘶𝘥, 𝘸𝘦'𝘥 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢 𝘣𝘢𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘶𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘵. That line isn't accounting. That's the thesis of 2028. It reframes the entire economic debate. No more painful austerity talk, no more "we have to cut programs." The new message is simple and devastating: 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘺𝘰𝘶. 𝘞𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘵. 𝘕𝘰𝘸 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘵. And then Vance turns to Gavin Newsom — or whoever the Democrat nominee is — and asks the question they cannot answer: before you promise us more programs and more spending, can you explain where the money went the last time? Can you explain why no one in your state stopped it? This is how you build a successor without naming one. You give them a lane. You give them a mission. You give them the chance to win — and the chance to fail. By 2028 we won't need to speculate about Rubio or Vance. We'll have watched them perform under actual pressure, on an actual stage, with actual consequences. If the economy holds, the fraud narrative becomes rocket fuel. If both men deliver — Rubio on the world stage and Vance on domestic accountability — we may be looking at the two strongest Republican candidates of a generation. Trump just put two pieces on the board. Watch them.

M.A. Rothman

303,618 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I’ve spent the past three days in Louisiana taking part in events organized by local community leaders to highlight the devastating impacts of the climate crisis — from Hurricane Katrina to the region dominated by the petrochemical industry known as Cancer Alley. I was deeply moved by the stories from Sharon Lavigne, risestjames and the many people from across the River Parishes who have seen the lives of their sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters cut short by the toxic chemicals in the air they breathe, water they drink, and food they eat. I had the opportunity to join my daughter Karenna as she led a dialogue for COP30’s Global Ethical Stocktake with those who work at the intersection of faith, environmental justice, and climate advocacy. It was made all the more powerful by our surroundings at the TEP Center with civil rights pioneer, Dr. Leona Tate. Today, I was honored to participate in the community commemoration of the 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina in the lower Ninth Ward. During Katrina, the levees failed. But so did the policies that have perpetuated environmental injustice and placed this community on the frontlines of the climate crisis. And so did the programs that were supposed to support the survivors of this disaster. We cannot continue to fail the people of Louisiana by using the sky as if it were an open sewer. We need to move swiftly to phase out the fossil fuels that are killing people with pollution in Cancer Alley and fueling stronger and more frequent extreme weather. When the rain comes, when the storms hit, when the drought dries up the water, when the ice melts and the sea level rises, remember these warnings came. Listen to the scientists who are warning us. Listen to the people of Cancer Alley, of the Lower Ninth Ward, and of all of the frontline communities who are demanding action. Thank you to Sharon and the entire RISE St. James team for hosting me and Climate Reality in St. James and Beyond Petrochemicals Repairers of the Breach Hip Hop Caucus 🏁 & Taproot Earth for your ongoing work to lift up the voices of those who live in Cancer Alley. And thank you to Rev Yearwood ✊🏾 for joining us in St. James and inviting me to join you in your #Katrina20 remembrance. We have much more work to do. So let’s rise to the occasion and demand climate action.

Al Gore

28,362 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

In 1951, at the height of Cold War fear, the Australian government attempted to dissolve the Communist Party of Australia by legislative fiat. The party was declared a menace. A threat. An evil. Parliament said so — therefore it must be so. The High Court disagreed. In the Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth case, the Court struck down the legislation as unconstitutional. One of the most enduring moments came from Justice Fullagar, who offered a simple but devastating analogy. A lighthouse, he said, may appear dangerous to a ship in the dark, but that does not make it unlawful. Calling something a danger does not make it one in law. Labeling something “evil” does not magically confer constitutional power. That reasoning matters — profoundly — today. The proposed hate crime and speech laws are once again built on assertion rather than constitutional footing. They proceed from the idea that if the government declares certain speech harmful, dangerous, or hateful, then restriction must follow. But the rule of law does not work that way. It never has — at least not in a liberal democracy worthy of the name. The Constitution exists precisely to restrain governments when fear, moral panic, or political convenience tempt them to overreach. It is not there to ratify whatever Parliament believes is good for us “for our safety.” History teaches that those words — for your safety — are among the most dangerous ever uttered by the state. Each time Australians accept another purported intrusion justified by protection, we move the boundary of lawful power. Slowly. Quietly. Respectably. Until one day we wake up and discover there is no longer a liberal democracy left to defend — only the memory of one. If our institutions fail to protect constitutional limits, this is not merely institutional drift. It is institutional failure. And if it happens without resistance, it will have happened under our watch. That leaves a choice. Stand up — or stay silent. And silence is never neutral. As the lesson from The Silence of the Lambs reminds us, the most chilling moments do not come from the screams themselves, but from the long, subversive quiet that preceded them. Remember that. The rule of law is worth standing up for — at any cost. That is what the Constitution is for.

Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- #Holdtheline™️

13,005 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The Russian dictator, who illegally invaded a sovereign country, bombs its grain ports, and runs a shadow fleet to finance his war is calling Ukraine a 'pirate'? putin may consider striking the ships of countries supporting Ukraine if a surge in attacks on his shadow tanker fleet continues. Question: Please provide a comment on the attacks on tankers off the coast of Turkiye. Another such incident occurred just today. putin: Frankly, I have not yet received that information. I am aware of the attacks on tankers in neutral waters, not even in neutral waters, but in the exclusive economic zone of a third state. This is nothing short of piracy. The Ukrainian armed forces tried to hit our seaports before as well. We responded – we did not start these operations – with reciprocal strikes. I assure you that ours were much more effective and devastating. They primarily targeted the ships that were used to deliver military equipment, materiel, and ammunition to Ukraine. We hit the targets we intended to hit, which we knew from secondary explosions we observed via aerial reconnaissance. However, what the Ukrainian armed forces are doing now is piracy. How might we respond? First, we will expand the range of our strikes against port infrastructure and ships that enter Ukrainian ports. That is the first point. Second, if this does not stop, we will consider the possibility – I am not saying we will necessarily do so, but we will consider that possibility – of reciprocal attacks against the ships of those countries that help Ukraine carry out these acts of piracy. The most radical option would be to cut Ukraine off from the sea. Then piracy would be impossible in principle. But these are the things to think about if other measures fail. I hope the Ukrainian military and political leadership and those who stand behind them will give it a thought to see whether this practice is worth continuing.” You start stamping your little feet and shouting empty threats at NATO flags. 'We will consider the possibility.' Yes we consider having a second coffee every morning. Wake me up when he actually tries to sink a German freighter. It’s all bluster to keep his terrified admirals in line and scare shippers so they can’t get insurance. Ukraine has taken out a third of his fleet. Instead of threatening global shipping, maybe he has to learn how to protect his rusty barges. putin is the global security problem, not the country he invaded.

Yasmina

18,119 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce