Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 Developing… Kinda: New York City’s Socialist Mayor Opens Victory Speech By Reading The Warning Label Out Loud NEW YORK, NY Mayor Zohran Mamdani celebrated his first 100 days by quoting Margaret Thatcher’s warning about socialism running out of other people’s money, which landed in the room like a...

12,405 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

New York Just Sang a Revolutionary Anthem at a Congressional Victory Party At Claire Valdez’s victory party, supporters openly sang “Solidarity Forever,” the radical anthem of revolutionary socialism written for the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), a union that openly called for the overthrow of capitalism. Valdez, a proud member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and former union organizer with the United Auto Workers at Columbia University, won the Democratic primary for New York’s 7th Congressional District. Backed heavily by socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani, she defeated Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso in a major victory for the radical left. Valdez has called for abolishing ICE and was arrested while protesting U.S. arms sales to Israel. She only recently entered the New York State Assembly in 2025 before immediately running for Congress with Mamdani’s full support. Now her supporters are celebrating by singing a song that calls for building “a new world from the ashes of the old.” This is not a normal political celebration. It is the open embrace of revolutionary ideology inside the Democratic Party. While Mamdani and his DSA machine install their people across New York, from Congress to the State Senate their supporters no longer feel the need to hide their radical roots - the Republicans have no plan to stop this! (We have been warning and reporting on the DSA threat for over a decade now) And once again, much of the political establishment watches in silence as this transformation accelerates and they sing songs that once represented the overthrow of the American system.. New York is not drifting. It is being captured.

Amy Mek

26,386 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨What Are You Doing at the Migrant Shelters, Eric? Here’s the truth , sources state. ⚠️ New York City Mayor Eric Adams has been quietly moving migrants from HERRC (Humanitarian Emergency Response and Relief Centers), funded by the city, into Department of Homeless Services (DHS) shelters, which are backed by federal dollars. This shift, confirmed by sources at multiple migrant shelters and hotels, appears to be Adams’ strategy to ease the immense financial burden on New York City as the cost of the migrant crisis soars to $5.6 billion annually. HERRC, operated by Health and Hospitals, is funded by New York City taxpayers, while DHS facilities receive federal funding. By moving migrants into federally funded DHS shelters, Adams is aiming to shift the financial burden away from the city and onto federal programs. For more than a year, Adams and his staff have publicly complained about the overwhelming expenses tied to the migrant influx, repeatedly asking the federal government for help. Having spent time at City Hall, I witnessed firsthand how frustrated Adams and his team became—if Adams had hair, he would have pulled it out from the stress of dealing with this crisis. The rising costs have led to deep budget cuts across the city, impacting key agencies and essential services. New Yorkers are feeling the effects as resources are redirected toward managing the migrant situation, leaving other critical areas underfunded. Now, Adams finds himself at the center of a federal indictment, which he claims is politically motivated. According to the mayor, the indictment is retaliation for his vocal criticism of the federal government's handling of the migrant crisis. Former President Donald Trump has even come out in support of Adams, backing the claim that the federal probe is linked to Adams' outspokenness on the crisis. While Adams' decision to move migrants to federally funded shelters may offer some financial relief, it raises bigger questions: Is this a short-term fix or a way to deflect growing criticism? With figures like Trump weighing in, the spotlight on Adams is only getting brighter, and the pressure to find a long-term solution continues to mount. By Leeroy Johnson All footage below is owned by me and copyright protected. For licensing email [email protected]

Viral News NYC

167,833 просмотров • 1 год назад

HEAT WAVE: ARE MAMDANI'S SOCIALIST POLICIES WORKING FOR NEW YORKERS ROASTING IN THIS HEAT WAVE? New York just lived through one of its hottest stretches in over a decade. This is exactly when leadership gets tested. Mamdani's answer was a thermostat suggestion. Set your AC to seventy eight degrees. Turn off your lights. Unplug what you can. Meanwhile in Riverdale, a Bronx neighborhood with a large Jewish community, Con Edison simply cut the power. Thousands of families sat in the dark and the heat while the mayor asked everyone else to sacrifice a little more. You cannot conserve your way out of a grid that cannot carry the load. That is not a talking point. That is physics. New York shut down Indian Point, its reliable nuclear plant, and leaned hard into wind and solar promises. Now the hottest week of the year arrives and the lights go out in the Bronx. Socialism always sounds generous in a speech. It looks very different when your refrigerator stops running and your kids cannot sleep through a heat emergency. The mayor who built his campaign on standing up for working class neighborhoods just watched a working class neighborhood lose power while a celebrity wedding lit up Madison Square Garden across town. That contrast writes itself. Nobody needed to manufacture it. Good intentions do not keep a refrigerator cold. Reliable power does. New Yorkers just found out the hard way which one their mayor actually delivered.

Bill Mitchell

240,773 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mamdani’s Pied-à-Terre Tax Hits Full-Time New Yorkers — And He’s Fine With That Mayor Zohran Mamdani is requiring longtime New York City residents who live in the city full-time to prove it — simply to avoid a new surcharge on their homes. Notices have been sent telling some owners they “may” face five-figure tax bills unless they submit documentation confirming their property is a primary residence. When pressed on the errors, the mayor largely dismissed the concerns, stating that the Department of Finance had “identified homes that may be subject to the surcharge” and that owners have time to appeal. “As required by the law, the Department of Finance sent informational resources to homeowners to ensure that they understood the tax… and also if they did not believe it to apply to them, that they had the time in order to be able to appeal,” Mamdani said. (Video: AI) At the same time, illegal immigrants continue to receive free housing and services costing New York City well over $1 billion this year. Full-time residents who own and live in valuable properties are being treated as if they must justify their presence. Why would anyone who has built equity and a life here choose to remain in a city that subjects them to this burden while others receive a free pass? Legal residents of means will answer by voting with their feet and relocating to cities and states that are more financially welcoming. This trend is already underway, and places like Florida and Texas are capitalizing on it.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

30,966 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Get ready America, Socialism is on the move. Once considered a taboo ideology, top Presidential wannabes like .Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her pal, pro Palestinian New York mayoral candidate .Zohran Kwame Mamdani, are paving the way to rip the mask off the stigma of socialism. .Democrats have been lost at sea and paddling uphill. They have no cohesive message. No clear leader. No enthusiasm for the party of rage to reclaim majority power. Desperation has set in. Democrats need a new game. Cue the radical rah rah’s. Mamdani and others are leaning in to their hungry base: the more than half of millennials and Gen Zers that now embrace socialism like oxygen to breathe. Who ever could’ve imagined? The greatest national on earth is leaning in to big government socialism. Leaning in to government overreach, to limiting individual freedoms, leaning into an entitlement state-run utopia. Leaning into disincentives for innovation, for private homes, the necessity of jobs. Why work? Leaning into erasing the American dream and the “evils” of capitalism. You send your kids to college, they return defiant activists. Obama’s Hope and Change and the transformation of America didn’t happen overnight. Academia and Democratic socialists politicians like Bernie and AOC have transformed what was once a fringe ideology into a highly popular political movement. Take them seriously. Socialism is the plan going forward. Kingmaker .James E. Clyburn has even endorsed NY mayoral candidate Mamdani, legitimizing the once socialist fringe ideology. Like it or not, Socialist ideologues are the pulse of the new Democrat party. Don’t be deceived by the word “Democratic” in front of socialist. There’s nothing “democratic”, “free or fair” about socialism, it’s the first rung on the road to communism: government controlled hell. But first, they have to sell it. And you must be bedazzled by equitable wealth distribution. They have to tempt you, lure you to the crossroads of Big Gov and freedom. And your walk to state-run hell begins with shame.

Tosca Austen

33,131 просмотров • 1 год назад

Quite a staggering press conference by the Power Minister I must say... Here is a point by point summary of the presser which may be helpful. 1. He starts off by admitting hamaray control mein kuch bhi nahin... 2. Then he says PMLN ne hamesha ke liye awam ko load shedding ke azab se azad kiya, in a presser about excessive load shedding for which he is apologising. 3. He first admits the role of LNG shortages in the load shedding issue, contradictory to the govt trying to press that this is because of reduced hydro electricity production. 4. Then he pivots to say that the issue is indeed of hydro electricity; a 1700 MW shortfall because the water cannot be released; effectively blaming the agriculture sector. Ridiculous, because the reservoirs are for irrigation, and hydroelectric production is a by product. It is the inability to plan for this that is on the govt. 5. Then he says there is no loadshedding during daylight hours, because of solar production - the same solar the govt tried to discredit. The claim is not true. Scores of feeders in Peshawar are seeing unannounced all day outages. 6. Then he says we have double the production capacity from gas (that we can't use because we have no more gas), and that we are using all the furnace oil in the country; effectively saying there is a fuel crisis in the country. 7. Then he says the wag the dog kneejerk power strategy effectively also led to industrial load shedding, so now the govt is damaging the economy as well as making consumers furious. 8. Then he says HESCO & KE is not suffering additional load shedding because there is enough power in the south, then why not the same logic to KP and Tarbela??? 9. Then the piece de resistance that the 2.5 hours load shedding is to reduce electricity bills for the public - which seems to be the most amazing marketing spin by the power sector for this unmitigated disaster. And to rub salt into the wounds he says this is the result of the major power sector reforms or which he is proud. This govt keeps failing miserably, and then thinks it can pass its failures as success. Extreme case of Form47itis... Full Presser:

Taimur Saleem Khan Jhagra

16,900 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨Little Devils Gang Terrorizes Midtown, Threatening NYC’s Tax Revenue and Local Businesses. This morning, around 10 AM, they robbed an innocent New Yorker in broad daylight. Four suspects were arrested and taken to Downtown Manhattan courthouse A few hours later, the same crew hit Five Below. What started as shoplifting quickly escalated when they pulled a knife on employees, turning it into a full-blown robbery, according to sources. This isn’t a one-off. Every single day, this crew is tied to multiple incidents—robberies, shoplifting, and violent confrontations. They run through the city with complete impunity, fully aware that because of their age, the law rarely holds them accountable, according to sources. Most of these younger gang members live in taxpayer-funded shelters. They get arrested, they rob people, they stab people, and then they return to their city-funded accommodations. Parents of these suspects do nothing. Why are New Yorkers paying for these gang members to hurt people—and then paying for their safe return? Business owners have been telling me this gang is costing them tons of money, not only through theft but by scaring away customers. With the holiday season around the corner, tourists may avoid spending money in Midtown or even in New York. Some may even tell friends they got robbed while visiting the city, which could have a lasting impact on tourism and local businesses. Midtown alone generates roughly 20% of New York City’s taxpayer revenue. Yet gangs like the Little Devils, coming from the Bronx or Queens, are terrorizing the area, hurting local businesses, scaring residents and visitors, and costing the city millions. If nothing changes, sooner or later they’re going to kill a cop or an innocent person. The situation is spiraling out of control, and Midtown is on edge. Every day there’s another crime, and every day they get bolder. This gang is a ticking time bomb, and the city’s residents, tourists, and businesses are watching in fear. By Leeroy Johnson For licensing email [email protected]

Viral News NYC

71,752 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

They started with 50. Now they say they’re 18,000 In 1996 there were fewer than 50 of them. Today, according to the organizers, up to 18,000 walked through Copenhagen. From Dronning Louises Bro to the Imam Ali Mosque. Look at the curve. This is how it happens. First a handful. Then a few hundred. Then it fills a bridge, a district, a capital. A little at a time, until it is no longer a little. And let me be fair, because fairness is the point. There is nothing strange about them holding this mourning procession. They have done it as part of their faith for more than a thousand years. It is theirs, and they believe in it. There is nothing strange about that at all. What should stop us is the other half. There is nothing strange about Europe allowing it either, and that is exactly the problem. Europe allows it because Europe has forgotten who it is. A people that remembers what it stands for does not need to ban anything, it simply knows where its own line runs. We have lost that. And so the issue was never them. The issue is us. Now look at what actually moved through the streets. Men in front. Women in the second row. That is not a detail, that is the whole point. It is a view of women set into a system and marched out into the public square, in a city where generations fought for women and men to stand as equals. The real question is not whether people may believe what they want. They may. The question is why our capital should cultivate a political law-religion that commemorates a 7th-century power struggle by dividing people by sex on Nørrebrogade. One of the organizers is the Imam Ali Mosque, repeatedly described as the Iranian regime’s extended arm in Denmark. The same regime that hangs women and young men from cranes. We are not importing culture. We are importing a system. And we let it grow, not because they are strong, but because we forgot why we were. First a little. Then a lot. Then too late.

Krisztina Maria

38,758 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

IS THE DEMOCRAT PARTY ABOUT TO SPLIT ITSELF IN HALF?! Byron Donalds said it plainly. This isn't new. This is who they've always been. Watch what just happened in New York. Zohran Mamdani's hand picked slate of democratic socialists knocked off two sitting Democrat incumbents in their own primaries. Not moderates losing to Republicans. Moderates losing to their own party's radical wing. Donalds called it years ago. Socialism. Open borders. Government control of healthcare. Energy policy that ignores nuclear and natural gas in favor of windmills that can't keep the lights on. "This has been the state of play for Democrat policy for a long, long time," he said. "It's just now they're coming out of the closet." He's right. The mask is off. Trump summed up the New York results with the perfect amount of mockery. "Mayor Mamdani pulled through 3 solid Communists, and has received loud and universal applause from the Fake News Media. Congratulations Mr. Mayor!" Even the NRCC is licking its chops. Spokesman Mike Marinella put it bluntly. "The Democrat Party has surrendered to radical socialist Zohran Mamdani and the far-left mob who are now running the show." Here is the real question heading into the midterms. Every House Democrat now has to answer for this. Vulnerable Democrats in swing districts cannot run from a national brand that just handed the microphone to self described socialists. Voters in Pennsylvania and Michigan are not signing up for city owned grocery stores and rent freezes. A party cannot serve two masters. It cannot promise Wall Street donors moderation while its base demands revolution. That fracture doesn't heal in five months. It just gets photographed at every town hall between now and November. Republicans do not need to invent this storyline. Democrats wrote it themselves, and now they have to run on it.

Bill Mitchell

14,270 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Today I was visiting the exceptionally beautiful Plantin-Moretus Museum in Antwerp, Belgium (one of the only museums in the world that is itself listed as UNESCO World Heritage), which is one of the oldest printing shops in Europe, with the oldest surviving printing presses in the world. I stumbled upon an old 16th century atlas - written in Old French - and I was pretty amused to read their understanding of China at the time, which was surprisingly accurate, maybe even more than today's! A translation of some of the most interesting passages: - They call it "China" in French (it's now called "Chine") and they write that the locals call it "Tangis", which probably refers to the Tang dynasty but which is strange given that by the 16th century the dynasty had already ended for about 600 years - They write that to its North China is bordered by "tartares" (which I guess means Mongols) whom they describe as "very warlike people from whom it is separated by a wall made by hand" - The Chinese work ethic was already legendary: "those who live there are not at all lazy but devoted to labor and work, because it is there a shameful thing to be idle" - They share a number which must have seemed astonishing at the time: "in the city of Canton, one of the smallest in the entire country, some ten or twelve thousand ducks are eaten daily at table". And then they marvel during a good proportion of the text about the abundance of food in the country, which probably made a big impression on travelers at the time. - They write that "there are in this kingdom two hundred and forty famous cities, whose names end in this syllable FU which means a city: like Cantonfu, Panquifu: the small towns, which are in great number, end in CHEU [undoubtedly refers to "zhou"]. There are infinite villages, heavily populated, because of the continuous agriculture." - China's infrastructure and engineering capabilities were also already legendary at the time: "The city gates have entrances magnificently and marvelously well made, the streets are made level, not sloping this way or that, but following their straight line. They are so wide that ten or fifteen men on horseback can march abreast and are everywhere marked and separated by triumphal arches that marvelously ornament the cities. Portuguese say they saw in the city of Fuchco [probably Fuzhou] a tower set on forty solid marble pillars, the height of which was forty palms (masonry measure) and the width twelve: that this work is so grand, so exquisitely made, so beautiful to see, so sumptuous and so pleasing that it far surpasses all the magnificent buildings of all Europe." - Already at the time, China was very wary of safeguarding its sovereignty: ""[The Chinese] rarely or never leave their country and do not easily let foreigners enter it, especially into the interior of the province, unless they first have safe conduct from the king." - On moral and cultural habits: "They put adulterers to death. There are no brothels in the cities, all manner of prostitutes being sent to the suburbs. They celebrate their weddings at the time of the new moon and around the month of March which is their first day of the new year, and they make these celebrations, like us, very magnificently. They show themselves valiant in banquets and entertainments, in which they owe nothing to the Flemings or the Germans. They eat at tables like us in Europe, on chairs or on benches, and not on the ground as other peoples of Asia do." - On justice: "Bandits and murderers are kept in perpetual prison. Theft, which is a very odious crime, is punished by whip strokes in this manner: they put a man belly down, tie his hands behind him, striking him on the fleshy part of the legs with a whip made of reeds or canes." - On China's naval capabilities at the time: "This kingdom has an infinite number of ships, galleys and vessels of all sorts, with which they cross the seas and rivers. So much so that when they want to show through vainglory the power of their king, they are accustomed to say in a common proverb that he can make a bridge of ships joined together, which can reach and extend from China to Malacca, which is a distance of five hundred leagues and more." - On the emperor and China not being warlike (already back then): "All this region is subject to a single king, like a monarch; whom they call lord of the world and son of the sun. He holds court at Paquin [Beijing], which is a city toward Tartary. He never leaves it, except in time of war. It is said that when he makes war on the Tartars he leads an army of three hundred thousand soldiers and two hundred thousand horses, although it is also said that this nation is not very warlike. This king has under him fifteen very large provinces, which they call governments, and he alone surpasses in power all the other neighboring princes of Asia; and his annual revenues exceed all the riches of Europe. Antonio Pigafetta [the chronicler of Magellan's voyage] calls this king the most powerful of all the universal earth and says that the royal city is fortified and ramparted with seven walls, having ten thousand soldiers for the guard, and that the king commands seventy other crowns of the royal diadem [likely refering to the tributary state system]." Reading these passages, it seems that the further we've come in our ability to know China, the more obscured our vision seems to have become. These 16th century observers, working with fragments brought back by explorers, merchants and missionaries, managed to capture the essential - the industriousness, the engineering mastery, the administrative sophistication, the careful sovereignty. They approached their subject with the humility of the genuinely curious. They had no framework to force China into, no predetermined narrative to fulfill. They simply watched, counted ducks in Canton, measured city walls, and wrote it down. Their errors were errors of transmission - a dynasty name lingering centuries past its time, numbers perhaps inflated through retelling - but the spirit was one of simply describing unknown territory, not to convince anyone of anything. Today however, drowning in information, we're somehow seeing less of what's there and more of what we expect to find. Each observation must fit into existing narratives, serve predetermined conclusions, advance familiar arguments. So much so that we must ask ourselves: have we actually moved backward from those 16th chroniclers? Maybe we need to re-learn to approach China - and others in general - like those old cartographers, pen in hand, ready to be surprised? What might we discover if we stopped explaining and started counting ducks again?

Arnaud Bertrand

19,380 просмотров • 1 год назад

OK, I have a definitive word on the CJ Abrams play from today's Pittsburgh Pirates at Washington Nationals game after talking with Elias Sports Bureau on this. This play will stay as a sacrifice fly. The originial ruling of NOT a sacrifice fly was for the exact same reason that I thought, which is that the infielder is not running into the outfield, which is year's past would have been correct As it was explained to me, in past years, an infielder had to be running almost in a straight line towards the outfield wall to be considered "running in the outfield". Here, since he is running, and he ends up further away from home (157 feet) than when he started (145 feet), this is going to count as a sacrifice fly. That definition is changing, in part from this play to help bring greater consistency, and to take some of the guesswork out of it (the argument that he is running into the outfield as opposed to more parallel). Now, folks all the time ask "why doesn't MLB publish the OS Manual" and I always say because it is a living document that can have the wording change, and the wording for this play will be modified to something like "more towards the outfield wall than towards home plate" to eliminate any confusion. The big key to this play is that he was running on a full sprint. Also, and this is helpful for me, but for all fly ball outs that score a run, Elias Saba reviews to ensure consistency. So, yes, it's a sacrifice fly, and now that I have that info from Elias themselves, that sort of settles this one. Sounds like the guidelines for this definition will be changing, either this season, or certainly for next season.

MLB Scoring Changes

49,141 просмотров • 1 месяц назад